Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Louisiana; Permitting of Greenhouse Gases, 46606-46608 [2016-16791]
Download as PDF
46606
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 137 / Monday, July 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 1710)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
[FR Doc. 2016–16917 Filed 7–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0022; FRL–9949–09–
Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Louisiana;
Permitting of Greenhouse Gases
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is partially approving and
partially disapproving a revision to the
Louisiana State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted on December 21, 2011.
This revision outlines the State’s
program to regulate and permit
emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs)
in the Louisiana Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD) program.
We are approving these provisions to
the extent that they address the GHG
permitting requirements for sources
already subject to PSD for pollutants
other than GHGs. We are disapproving
these provisions to the extent they
require PSD permitting for sources that
emit only GHGs above the thresholds
triggering the requirement to obtain a
PSD permit since that is no longer
consistent with federal law. The EPA is
taking this action under section 110 and
part C of the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on August
17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0022. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the http://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through http://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Adina Wiley, wiley.adina@epa.gov,
(214) 665–2115.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Jul 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
I. Background
The background for this action is
discussed in detail in our May 6, 2016
proposal. See 81 FR 27382. In that
document we proposed to approve as
revisions to the Louisiana SIP, the
revisions to the Louisiana PSD
permitting program submitted on
December 21, 2011, that provide the
State the authority to regulate and
permit emissions of GHGs from Step 1
sources in the Louisiana PSD program.
We also proposed to disapprove the
provisions submitted on December 21,
2011, that would enable the State of
Louisiana to regulate and permit Step 2
sources under the Louisiana PSD
program because the submitted
provisions were no longer consistent
with federal laws.
Our proposed action also corrected an
omission in the EPA’s August 19, 2015,
proposed approval of the Louisiana
Major New Source Review program,
where we did not explicitly propose
approval of a portion of the definition
of ‘‘major stationary source.’’ To correct
this omission, we provided an
additional opportunity for the public to
comment on the revisions to the
definition of ‘‘major stationary source’’
at LAC 33:III.509(B) submitted on
December 20, 2005 as subparagraph (e),
but was moved to subparagraph (f) in
the December 21, 2011 submittal.
II. Response to Comments
We received comments from the
Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality (LDEQ). Our responses are
provided below.
Comment 1: The LDEQ commented
that the State initiated rulemaking
AQ358 on January 20, 2016, to remove
the PSD GHG Step 2 permitting
provisions. The rulemaking was
promulgated on April 20, 2016, after no
comments were received during the
public comment period. Therefore,
LDEQ’s PSD program no longer contains
permitting requirements for Step 2
sources. The LDEQ also submitted
copies of the AQ358 rulemaking for
reference.
Response 1: We recognize that the
LDEQ has completed a rulemaking to
remove the Step 2 GHG permitting
provisions from the LDEQ PSD program
consistent with our proposed partial
disapproval. Today’s final action
disapproves the Step 2 provisions that
were submitted for the EPA’s
consideration as a revision to the
Louisiana SIP. No further actions are
necessary on the part of the LDEQ to
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
remove the Step 2 provisions adopted
by the LDEQ on April 20, 2011 and
submitted December 21, 2011, from our
consideration. Further, today’s final
action also removes the portion of the
Louisiana SIP at 40 CFR 52.986(c) where
the EPA narrowed our approval of the
Louisiana PSD SIP to apply to Step 2
permitting. See 75 FR 82536, December
30, 2010.
Comment 2: The LDEQ provided
comment on the EPA’s interpretation of
the ‘‘automatic rescission provisions’’
under LAC 33:III.501(C)(14).
Specifically, the LDEQ commented that
‘‘In the event of a ‘‘change in federal
law’’ or a Supreme Court or D.C. Circuit
‘‘order which limits or renders
ineffective the regulation’’ of GHGs
under Part C of Title I of the Clean Air
Act, LDEQ will provide notice to the
general public and regulated community
if such law or order will impact how
LDEQ’s [sic] administers its PSD
program under LAC 33:III.509. In
addition, LDEQ will ensure that any
such changes are consistent with EPA’s
interpretation of the law or order.’’
Response 2: The EPA appreciates the
comment from the LDEQ and the
affirmation that the LDEQ will provide
notice to the general public and
community in the event of a change in
federal law or a court decision that
limits or renders ineffective the
regulation of GHGs under the PSD
program. We note that the LDEQ stated
public notice would likely be through
the LDEQ Web site; we find this method
to be sufficient to satisfy the
requirements of section 110(l) of the
CAA.
III. Final Action
We are approving the following
revisions to the Louisiana SIP submitted
on December 21, 2011. The revisions
were adopted and submitted in
accordance with the CAA and are
consistent with the laws and regulations
for PSD permitting of GHGs; therefore
we are taking final action to approve
these revisions under section 110 and
part C of the Act.
• New provisions as LAC
33:III.501(C)(14) adopted on April 20,
2011 and submitted December 21, 2011;
• New definitions of ‘‘carbon dioxide
equivalent’’ and ‘‘greenhouse gases’’ at
LAC 33:III.509(B) adopted on April 20,
2011 and submitted December 21, 2011;
• Revisions to the definitions of
‘‘major stationary source’’ paragraphs (a)
and (b) and ‘‘significant’’ at LAC
33:III.509(B) adopted on April 20, 2011
and submitted on December 21, 2011;
and
• Revisions to the definition of
‘‘major stationary source’’ paragraph (e)
E:\FR\FM\18JYR1.SGM
18JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 137 / Monday, July 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
as submitted on December 20, 2005, and
renumbered to paragraph (f) in the April
20, 2011 adoption submitted on
December 21, 2011.
As a result of our final approval of the
above revisions, the EPA is also
removing the existing provisions at 40
CFR 52.986(c) under which the EPA
narrowed the applicability of the
Louisiana PSD program to regulate
sources consistent with federal PSD
permitting requirements.
We are disapproving the following
severable portions of the December 21,
2011 Louisiana SIP submittal that
establish GHG permitting requirements
for Step 2 sources:
• Revisions to the definitions of
‘‘major stationary source’’ paragraph (c)
and ‘‘significant’’ as it pertains to Step
2 sources, adopted on April 20, 2011
and submitted on December 21, 2011.
As a result of our final disapproval of
the above revisions, the EPA is adding
a new entry at 40 CFR 52.986(c) to
reflect the disapproval of the PSD GHG
Step 2 provisions. We are taking this
final action under section 110 and part
C of the Act; as such, we are not
imposing sanctions as a result of this
final disapproval. This final disapproval
does not require the EPA to promulgate
a Federal Implementation Plan because
we are finding that the submitted
provisions are inconsistent with federal
laws for the regulation and permitting of
GHG emissions.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, we are finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
revisions to the Louisiana regulations as
described in the Final Action section
above. We have made, and will continue
to make, these documents generally
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or in hard
copy at the EPA Region 6 office.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
proposes approval of the portions of the
submitted revisions to State law for the
regulation and permitting of GHG
emissions consistent with federal
requirements and proposes disapproval
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Jul 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
of the portions of the state laws that do
not meet Federal requirements for the
regulation and permitting of GHG
emissions.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA. There is no burden imposed under
the PRA because this action proposes to
disapprove submitted revisions that are
no longer consistent with federal laws
for the regulation and permitting of
GHG emissions.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. This action proposes to
disapprove submitted revisions that are
no longer consistent with federal laws
for the regulation and permitting of
GHG emissions, and therefore will have
no impact on small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local or
tribal governments or the private sector.
This action proposes to disapprove
submitted revisions that are no longer
consistent with federal laws for the
regulation and permitting of GHG
emissions, and therefore will have no
impact on small governments.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This action proposes to
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
46607
disapprove provisions of state law that
are no longer consistent with federal
laws for the regulation and permitting of
GHG emissions; there are no
requirements or responsibilities added
or removed from Indian Tribal
Governments. Thus, Executive Order
13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it disapproves state permitting
provisions that are inconsistent with
federal laws for the regulation and
permitting of GHG emissions.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes the human health or
environmental risk addressed by this
action will not have potential
disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects
on minority, low-income or indigenous
populations. This action is not subject
to Executive Order 12898 because it
disapproves state permitting provisions
that are inconsistent with federal laws
for the regulation and permitting of
GHG emissions.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
E:\FR\FM\18JYR1.SGM
18JYR1
46608
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 137 / Monday, July 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 16,
2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52
Subpart T—Louisiana
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
2. In § 52.970(c), the table titled ‘‘EPA
Approved Louisiana Regulations in the
Louisiana SIP’’ is amended by revising
the entries for ‘‘Section 501’’ and
‘‘Section 509’’ under Chapter 5—Permit
Procedures to read as follows:
■
Dated: July 7, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
§ 52.970
*
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA APPROVED LOUISIANA REGULATIONS IN THE LOUISIANA SIP
State citation
State approval
date
Title/Subject
*
*
*
*
Chapter 5—Permit Procedures
Section 501 ................
Scope and Applicability .................................
*
Section 509 ................
*
*
Prevention of Significant Deterioration .........
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 52.986 is amended by
revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 52.986
quality.
Significant deterioration of air
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
4/20/2011
*
12/20/2012
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The revisions to the Louisiana SIP
adopted on April 20, 2011, and
submitted on December 21, 2011,
establishing PSD permitting
requirements for sources that are
classified as major and thus required to
obtain a PSD permit based solely on
their potential GHG emissions (‘‘Step 2’’
sources) at the definition of ‘‘major
16:07 Jul 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
*
stationary source’’ paragraph (c) and the
definition of ‘‘significant’’ at LAC
33:III.509(B), are disapproved as
inconsistent with federal law for the
regulation and permitting of GHGs.
PO 00000
*
*
*
7/18/2016, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Comments
*
7/18/2016, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
[FR Doc. 2016–16791 Filed 7–15–16; 8:45 am]
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
EPA approval date
*
*
SIP does not include the
provisions for Step 2
GHG permitting at
‘‘major stationary
source’’ paragraph (c)
or ‘‘significant’’ as
adopted on April 20,
2011.
SIP does not include the
PM2.5 SMC at LAC
33:III.509(I)(5)(a) from
the 12/20/2012 adoption. LAC
33:III.509(I)(5)(a) is SIPapproved as of 10/20/
2007 adoption.
*
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0164; FRL–9949–07–
Region 9]
Determination of Attainment of the 1Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard in the San Joaquin
Valley Nonattainment Area in
California
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\18JYR1.SGM
18JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 137 (Monday, July 18, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46606-46608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16791]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2012-0022; FRL-9949-09-Region 6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Louisiana;
Permitting of Greenhouse Gases
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is partially
approving and partially disapproving a revision to the Louisiana State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted on December 21, 2011. This revision
outlines the State's program to regulate and permit emissions of
greenhouse gases (GHGs) in the Louisiana Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) program. We are approving these provisions to the
extent that they address the GHG permitting requirements for sources
already subject to PSD for pollutants other than GHGs. We are
disapproving these provisions to the extent they require PSD permitting
for sources that emit only GHGs above the thresholds triggering the
requirement to obtain a PSD permit since that is no longer consistent
with federal law. The EPA is taking this action under section 110 and
part C of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on August 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-2012-0022. All documents in the docket are
listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Adina Wiley, wiley.adina@epa.gov,
(214) 665-2115.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means the EPA.
I. Background
The background for this action is discussed in detail in our May 6,
2016 proposal. See 81 FR 27382. In that document we proposed to approve
as revisions to the Louisiana SIP, the revisions to the Louisiana PSD
permitting program submitted on December 21, 2011, that provide the
State the authority to regulate and permit emissions of GHGs from Step
1 sources in the Louisiana PSD program. We also proposed to disapprove
the provisions submitted on December 21, 2011, that would enable the
State of Louisiana to regulate and permit Step 2 sources under the
Louisiana PSD program because the submitted provisions were no longer
consistent with federal laws.
Our proposed action also corrected an omission in the EPA's August
19, 2015, proposed approval of the Louisiana Major New Source Review
program, where we did not explicitly propose approval of a portion of
the definition of ``major stationary source.'' To correct this
omission, we provided an additional opportunity for the public to
comment on the revisions to the definition of ``major stationary
source'' at LAC 33:III.509(B) submitted on December 20, 2005 as
subparagraph (e), but was moved to subparagraph (f) in the December 21,
2011 submittal.
II. Response to Comments
We received comments from the Louisiana Department of Environmental
Quality (LDEQ). Our responses are provided below.
Comment 1: The LDEQ commented that the State initiated rulemaking
AQ358 on January 20, 2016, to remove the PSD GHG Step 2 permitting
provisions. The rulemaking was promulgated on April 20, 2016, after no
comments were received during the public comment period. Therefore,
LDEQ's PSD program no longer contains permitting requirements for Step
2 sources. The LDEQ also submitted copies of the AQ358 rulemaking for
reference.
Response 1: We recognize that the LDEQ has completed a rulemaking
to remove the Step 2 GHG permitting provisions from the LDEQ PSD
program consistent with our proposed partial disapproval. Today's final
action disapproves the Step 2 provisions that were submitted for the
EPA's consideration as a revision to the Louisiana SIP. No further
actions are necessary on the part of the LDEQ to remove the Step 2
provisions adopted by the LDEQ on April 20, 2011 and submitted December
21, 2011, from our consideration. Further, today's final action also
removes the portion of the Louisiana SIP at 40 CFR 52.986(c) where the
EPA narrowed our approval of the Louisiana PSD SIP to apply to Step 2
permitting. See 75 FR 82536, December 30, 2010.
Comment 2: The LDEQ provided comment on the EPA's interpretation of
the ``automatic rescission provisions'' under LAC 33:III.501(C)(14).
Specifically, the LDEQ commented that ``In the event of a ``change in
federal law'' or a Supreme Court or D.C. Circuit ``order which limits
or renders ineffective the regulation'' of GHGs under Part C of Title I
of the Clean Air Act, LDEQ will provide notice to the general public
and regulated community if such law or order will impact how LDEQ's
[sic] administers its PSD program under LAC 33:III.509. In addition,
LDEQ will ensure that any such changes are consistent with EPA's
interpretation of the law or order.''
Response 2: The EPA appreciates the comment from the LDEQ and the
affirmation that the LDEQ will provide notice to the general public and
community in the event of a change in federal law or a court decision
that limits or renders ineffective the regulation of GHGs under the PSD
program. We note that the LDEQ stated public notice would likely be
through the LDEQ Web site; we find this method to be sufficient to
satisfy the requirements of section 110(l) of the CAA.
III. Final Action
We are approving the following revisions to the Louisiana SIP
submitted on December 21, 2011. The revisions were adopted and
submitted in accordance with the CAA and are consistent with the laws
and regulations for PSD permitting of GHGs; therefore we are taking
final action to approve these revisions under section 110 and part C of
the Act.
New provisions as LAC 33:III.501(C)(14) adopted on April
20, 2011 and submitted December 21, 2011;
New definitions of ``carbon dioxide equivalent'' and
``greenhouse gases'' at LAC 33:III.509(B) adopted on April 20, 2011 and
submitted December 21, 2011;
Revisions to the definitions of ``major stationary
source'' paragraphs (a) and (b) and ``significant'' at LAC
33:III.509(B) adopted on April 20, 2011 and submitted on December 21,
2011; and
Revisions to the definition of ``major stationary source''
paragraph (e)
[[Page 46607]]
as submitted on December 20, 2005, and renumbered to paragraph (f) in
the April 20, 2011 adoption submitted on December 21, 2011.
As a result of our final approval of the above revisions, the EPA
is also removing the existing provisions at 40 CFR 52.986(c) under
which the EPA narrowed the applicability of the Louisiana PSD program
to regulate sources consistent with federal PSD permitting
requirements.
We are disapproving the following severable portions of the
December 21, 2011 Louisiana SIP submittal that establish GHG permitting
requirements for Step 2 sources:
Revisions to the definitions of ``major stationary
source'' paragraph (c) and ``significant'' as it pertains to Step 2
sources, adopted on April 20, 2011 and submitted on December 21, 2011.
As a result of our final disapproval of the above revisions, the
EPA is adding a new entry at 40 CFR 52.986(c) to reflect the
disapproval of the PSD GHG Step 2 provisions. We are taking this final
action under section 110 and part C of the Act; as such, we are not
imposing sanctions as a result of this final disapproval. This final
disapproval does not require the EPA to promulgate a Federal
Implementation Plan because we are finding that the submitted
provisions are inconsistent with federal laws for the regulation and
permitting of GHG emissions.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, we are finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR 51.5, we are finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
revisions to the Louisiana regulations as described in the Final Action
section above. We have made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or
in hard copy at the EPA Region 6 office.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action proposes approval of the portions of the submitted revisions to
State law for the regulation and permitting of GHG emissions consistent
with federal requirements and proposes disapproval of the portions of
the state laws that do not meet Federal requirements for the regulation
and permitting of GHG emissions.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. There is no burden imposed under the PRA because this action
proposes to disapprove submitted revisions that are no longer
consistent with federal laws for the regulation and permitting of GHG
emissions.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
proposes to disapprove submitted revisions that are no longer
consistent with federal laws for the regulation and permitting of GHG
emissions, and therefore will have no impact on small entities.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector. This action proposes
to disapprove submitted revisions that are no longer consistent with
federal laws for the regulation and permitting of GHG emissions, and
therefore will have no impact on small governments.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action proposes to disapprove provisions of
state law that are no longer consistent with federal laws for the
regulation and permitting of GHG emissions; there are no requirements
or responsibilities added or removed from Indian Tribal Governments.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it disapproves state permitting
provisions that are inconsistent with federal laws for the regulation
and permitting of GHG emissions.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed
by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental effects on minority, low-income
or indigenous populations. This action is not subject to Executive
Order 12898 because it disapproves state permitting provisions that are
inconsistent with federal laws for the regulation and permitting of GHG
emissions.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate,
[[Page 46608]]
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.
A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in
the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by
5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 16, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 7, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart T--Louisiana
0
2. In Sec. 52.970(c), the table titled ``EPA Approved Louisiana
Regulations in the Louisiana SIP'' is amended by revising the entries
for ``Section 501'' and ``Section 509'' under Chapter 5--Permit
Procedures to read as follows:
Sec. 52.970 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA Approved Louisiana Regulations in the Louisiana SIP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State approval
State citation Title/Subject date EPA approval date Comments
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Chapter 5--Permit Procedures
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 501...................... Scope and Applicability.. 4/20/2011 7/18/2016, [Insert Federal Register ....................................
citation].
* * * * * * *
Section 509...................... Prevention of Significant 12/20/2012 7/18/2016, [Insert Federal Register SIP does not include the provisions
Deterioration. citation]. for Step 2 GHG permitting at
``major stationary source''
paragraph (c) or ``significant'' as
adopted on April 20, 2011.
SIP does not include the PM2.5 SMC
at LAC 33:III.509(I)(5)(a) from the
12/20/2012 adoption. LAC
33:III.509(I)(5)(a) is SIP-approved
as of 10/20/2007 adoption.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
3. Section 52.986 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.986 Significant deterioration of air quality.
* * * * *
(c) The revisions to the Louisiana SIP adopted on April 20, 2011,
and submitted on December 21, 2011, establishing PSD permitting
requirements for sources that are classified as major and thus required
to obtain a PSD permit based solely on their potential GHG emissions
(``Step 2'' sources) at the definition of ``major stationary source''
paragraph (c) and the definition of ``significant'' at LAC
33:III.509(B), are disapproved as inconsistent with federal law for the
regulation and permitting of GHGs.
[FR Doc. 2016-16791 Filed 7-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P