Extension of the Attainment Date for the Oakridge, Oregon 24-hour PM2.5, 46612-46613 [2016-16789]
Download as PDF
46612
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 137 / Monday, July 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and,
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this final clean data
determination does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000) because the SIP obligations
discussed herein do not apply to Indian
Tribes, and thus will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 16,
2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Oxides of nitrogen, Ozone, Volatile
organic compounds.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Jul 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
Dated: June 30, 2016.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.282 is amended by
adding paragraph (h) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.282
Ozone
Control strategy and regulations:
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Determination of attainment. EPA
has determined that, as of August 17,
2016, the San Joaquin Valley 1-hour
ozone nonattainment area has attained
the 1-hour ozone standard, based upon
sufficient, quality-assured and certified
ambient air quality monitoring data for
2012–2014.
[FR Doc. 2016–16792 Filed 7–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2016–0051; FRL—9949–
18–Region 10]
Extension of the Attainment Date for
the Oakridge, Oregon 24-hour PM2.5
Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing its decision
to grant a 1-year extension of the
attainment date for the Oakridge,
Oregon nonattainment area to meet the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS from
December 31, 2015 to December 31,
2016, on the basis that the State has met
the criteria for such an extension under
the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective August
17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2016–0051. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information the disclosure
of which is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in
hard copy form. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Planning Unit, Office of Air and
Waste, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. The EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information please contact Justin
Spenillo at (206) 553–6125,
spenillo.justin@epa.gov or by using the
above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background Information
On May 18, 2016, the EPA proposed
to grant a 1-year extension of the
attainment date for the Oakridge,
Oregon nonattainment area to meet the
2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS from
December 31, 2015 to December 31,
2016, on the basis that the State has met
the criteria for such an extension under
the CAA (81 FR 31202). An explanation
of the CAA requirements, a detailed
analysis of the submittal, and the EPA’s
reasons for proposing approval were
provided in the notice of proposed
rulemaking, and will not be restated
here. The public comment period for
this proposed rule ended on June 17,
2016. The EPA received no comments
on the proposal.
II. Final Action
The EPA finds that the State has met
the criteria for receiving a 1-year
extension to the Moderate area
attainment date for the 2006 PM2.5
NAAQS for the Oakridge NAA as
provided in section 188(d) of the Act.
The State is implementing the
requirements and commitments in the
applicable attainment plan for the PM2.5
NAAQS in the area, and the 98th
percentile 24-hour PM2.5 air quality
value for 2015 is below 35 mg/m3.
Accordingly, the State has established
that it meets the criteria of section
188(d) as the EPA interprets those
requirements for purposes of the 2006
E:\FR\FM\18JYR1.SGM
18JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 137 / Monday, July 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
PM2.5 NAAQS. The EPA therefore
exercises the discretion granted to the
Administrator by section 188(d) of the
CAA to extend the Moderate area
attainment date for the Oakridge NAA
from December 31, 2015 to December
31, 2016.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Statutory and Executive Orders
Review
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Jul 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
46613
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
The SIP is not approved to apply on any
Indian reservation land or in any other
area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 16,
2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
Office of the Secretary
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 7, 2016.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2016–16789 Filed 7–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
45 CFR Part 92
[HHS–OCR–2015–0006]
RIN 0945–AA02
Nondiscrimination in Health Programs
and Activities; Correction
AGENCY:
Office of the Secretary (OS),
HHS.
ACTION:
Final rule; correction.
This document corrects a
typographical error that appeared in the
final rule published in the Federal
Register on May 18, 2016, entitled
‘‘Nondiscrimination in Health Programs
and Activities.’’
DATES: This correction is effective on
July 18, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Section 1557 mailbox at 1557@hhs.gov.
Eileen Hanrahan, (800) 368–1019 or
(800) 537–7697 (TDD).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
In FR Doc. 2016–11458 of May 18,
2016 (81 FR 31375) (hereinafter referred
to as the Section 1557 final rule) there
is a typographical error that is discussed
in the ‘‘Summary of Error,’’ and further
identified and corrected in the
‘‘Correction of Error’’ section below. The
provision in this correction document is
effective as if it had been included in
the Section 1557 final rule published in
the Federal Register on May 18, 2016.
II. Summary of Error
On page 31473, in Appendix A to Part
92—Sample Notice Informing
Individuals About Nondiscrimination
and Accessibility Requirements and
Sample Nondiscrimination Statement:
Discrimination is Against the Law, the
telephone number provided for
assistance with filing a civil rights
complaint with the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, Office for
Civil Rights was incorrect. The correct
telephone number is 800–368–1019.
III. Correction of Error
In FR Doc. 2016–11458 of May 18,
2016 (81 FR 31375), make the following
correction:
1. On page 31473, first column, first
full paragraph, line 22, ‘‘1–800–868–
1019’’ is corrected to read ‘‘1–800–368–
1019’’.
E:\FR\FM\18JYR1.SGM
18JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 137 (Monday, July 18, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 46612-46613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16789]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2016-0051; FRL--9949-18-Region 10]
Extension of the Attainment Date for the Oakridge, Oregon 24-hour
PM2.5 Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing its
decision to grant a 1-year extension of the attainment date for the
Oakridge, Oregon nonattainment area to meet the 2006 24-hour
PM2.5 NAAQS from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016, on
the basis that the State has met the criteria for such an extension
under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective August 17, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2016-0051. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Planning Unit, Office of
Air and Waste, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. The
EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the individual listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of
the docket. You may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information please contact Justin
Spenillo at (206) 553-6125, spenillo.justin@epa.gov or by using the
above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background Information
On May 18, 2016, the EPA proposed to grant a 1-year extension of
the attainment date for the Oakridge, Oregon nonattainment area to meet
the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS from December 31, 2015 to
December 31, 2016, on the basis that the State has met the criteria for
such an extension under the CAA (81 FR 31202). An explanation of the
CAA requirements, a detailed analysis of the submittal, and the EPA's
reasons for proposing approval were provided in the notice of proposed
rulemaking, and will not be restated here. The public comment period
for this proposed rule ended on June 17, 2016. The EPA received no
comments on the proposal.
II. Final Action
The EPA finds that the State has met the criteria for receiving a
1-year extension to the Moderate area attainment date for the 2006
PM2.5 NAAQS for the Oakridge NAA as provided in section
188(d) of the Act. The State is implementing the requirements and
commitments in the applicable attainment plan for the PM2.5
NAAQS in the area, and the 98th percentile 24-hour PM2.5 air
quality value for 2015 is below 35 [mu]g/m\3\. Accordingly, the State
has established that it meets the criteria of section 188(d) as the EPA
interprets those requirements for purposes of the 2006
[[Page 46613]]
PM2.5 NAAQS. The EPA therefore exercises the discretion
granted to the Administrator by section 188(d) of the CAA to extend the
Moderate area attainment date for the Oakridge NAA from December 31,
2015 to December 31, 2016.
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in
any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 16, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: July 7, 2016.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2016-16789 Filed 7-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P