Safety Zone, Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air Show; Atlantic Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL, 44825-44827 [2016-16331]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
standards-setting organization, and the
IMO.
M. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f, and we have made
a preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this categorical exclusion
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ section of this preamble.
This proposed rule involves
regulations concerning tank vessel
equipment approval and operation.
Thus, this proposed rule will likely be
categorically excluded under Section
2.b.2, figure 2–1, paragraph 34(d), (e),
and (i) of the Instruction and Section
6(a) of the ‘‘Appendix to National
Environmental Policy Act: Coast Guard
Procedures for Categorical Exclusions,
Notice of Final Agency Policy’’ (67 FR
48243, July 23, 2002). We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 164
Marine, Navigation (water),
Incorporation by reference, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 164 as follows:
Title 33—Navigation and Navigable
Waters
1. The authority citation for part 164
is revised to read as follows:
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1223, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
2103, 3703; and E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3
CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277. Sec. 164.13 also
issued under 46 U.S.C. 8502. Sec. 164.46 also
issued under 46 U.S.C. 70114 and Sec. 102
of Pub. L. 107–295. Sec. 164.61 also issued
under 46 U.S.C. 6101. The Secretary’s
authority under these sections is delegated to
the Coast Guard by Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1, para. II (70),
(92.a), (92.b), (92.d), (92.f), and (97.j).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:20 Jul 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
*
*
*
*
(h) International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC), 3, rue de Varembe,
Geneva, Switzerland, +41 22 919 02 11,
https://www.iec.ch/.
(1) IEC 62065 Edition 1.0 (2002–03),
Maritime navigation and
radiocommunications equipment and
systems—Track control systems—
Operational and performance
requirements, methods of testing and
required test results—incorporation by
reference approved for § 164.13(d).
(2) IEC 62065 Edition 2.0 (2014–02),
Maritime navigation and
radiocommunications equipment and
systems—Track control systems—
Operational and performance
requirements, methods of testing and
required test results—incorporation by
reference approved for § 164.13(d).
■ 3. Amend § 164.13 by removing
paragraph (e) and revising paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
§ 164.13
Navigation underway: Tankers.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) This paragraph (d) has preemptive
effect over State or local regulation
within the same field. A tanker may
navigate using a heading or track control
system only if—
(1) The tanker is beyond one-half
nautical mile off shore or not within
waters specified in 33 CFR part 110
(anchorages);
(2) There is a person, competent to
steer the vessel, present to assume
manual control of the steering station;
and
(3) The system meets the heading or
track control specifications of either IEC
62065 (2002:03) or IEC 62065 (2014:02)
(incorporated by reference, see
§ 164.03).
Dated: June 28, 2016.
David C. Barata,
Acting Director of Marine Transportation
Systems Management, U.S. Coast Guard.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■
2. Amend § 164.03 by adding
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Incorporation by reference.
*
[FR Doc. 2016–15791 Filed 7–8–16; 8:45 am]
PART 164—NAVIGATION SAFETY
REGULATIONS
■
§ 164.03
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0077]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone, Daytona Beach Wings
and Waves Air Show; Atlantic Ocean,
Daytona Beach, FL
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Coast Guard, DHS.
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
44825
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a safety zone on the waters of
the Atlantic Ocean east of Daytona
Beach, Florida during the Daytona
Beach Wings and Waves Air Show. This
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on the navigable waters
surrounding the event. This safety zone
will be enforced daily 11 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., from October 6 through October 9,
2016. This proposed rulemaking would
prohibit persons and vessels from being
in the safety zone unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port (COTP)
Jacksonville or a designated
representative. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–0077 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Allan Storm, Sector Jacksonville,
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone (904) 714–7616,
email Allan.H.Storm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ § Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On December 15, 2015, Embry Riddle
Aeronautical University/David Schultz
Airshows LLC submitted a marine event
application to the Coast Guard for the
Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air
Show that will take place from October
6 through 9, 2016. The air show will
consist of various flight demonstrations
over the Atlantic Ocean, just offshore
from Daytona Beach, FL. Over the years,
there have been unfortunate instances of
aircraft mishaps that involve crashing
during performances at various air
shows around the world. Occasionally,
these incidents result in a wide area of
scattered debris in the water that can
damage property or cause significant
injury or death to the public observing
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
44826
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
the air shows from the water. The
Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville
has determined that a safety zone is
necessary to protect the general public
from hazards associated with aerial
flight demonstrations.
The purpose of the rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and persons
during the air show on the navigable
waters of the Atlantic Ocean in Daytona
Beach, FL. The Coast Guard proposes
this rulemaking under authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone from 11 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on
October 6 through October 9, 2016. The
safety zone will encompass all waters
within an area approximately two
nautical miles parallel to the shoreline,
and one half nautical mile out into the
Atlantic Ocean offshore from Daytona
Beach, Florida. The duration of the zone
is intended to ensure the safety of the
public and these navigable waters
during the aerial flight demonstrations.
No vessel or person would be permitted
to enter the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative. The
regulatory text the Coast Guard is
proposing appears at the end of this
document.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which
would impact a small designated area of
the Atlantic Ocean for five and a half
hours on each of the four days the air
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:20 Jul 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
show is occurring. Moreover, the Coast
Guard would issue a broadcast notice to
mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone, and the rule would
allow vessels to seek permission to enter
the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone that would
prohibit persons and vessels from
transiting through a one square nautical
mile regulated area during a four day air
show lasting five and a half hours daily.
Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A
preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:20 Jul 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T07–0077 to read as
follows:
44827
p.m. from October 6 through October 9,
2016.
Dated: June 27, 2016.
J.F. Dixon,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 2016–16331 Filed 7–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■
§ 165.T07–0077 Safety Zone; Daytona
Beach Wings and Waves Air Show, Atlantic
Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL.
(a) Regulated Area. The following
regulated area is a safety zone located
offshore from Daytona Beach, FL. All
waters of the Atlantic Ocean
encompassed within an imaginary line
connecting the following points:
Starting at Point 1 in position
29°14′44.72″ N., 081°0′46.90″ W.; thence
northeast to Point 2 in position
29°14′58.74″ N., 081°0′16.18″ W.; thence
southeast to Point 3 in position
29°13′3.80″ N., 080°59′21.78″ W.; thence
southwest to Point 4 in position
29°12′54.63″ N., 080°59′53.87″ W.;
thence northwest back to origin. These
coordinates are based on North
American Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Jacksonville in the
enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated area
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Jacksonville or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Port
Jacksonville by telephone at 904–714–
7557, or a designated representative via
VHF–FM radio on channel 16, to
request authorization. If authorization is
granted, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization must
comply with the instructions of the
COTP Jacksonville or a designated
representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area through
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM channel 16 or by on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced daily 11 a.m. to 4:30
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 38
RIN 2900–AP74
Authority To Solicit Gifts and
Donations
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is proposing to amend its
National Cemeteries regulation on the
prohibition of officials and employees of
VA from soliciting contributions from
the public or authorizing the use of their
names, name of the Secretary, or the
name of VA for the purpose of making
a gift or donation to VA. The amended
regulation would give the Under
Secretary of Memorial Affairs (USMA),
or his designee, authority to solicit gifts
and donations, which include monetary
donations, in-kind goods and services,
and personal property, or authorize the
use of their names, the name of the
Secretary, or the name of VA by an
individual or organization in any
campaign or drive for donation of
money or articles to VA for the purpose
of beautifying, or for the benefit of, one
or more national cemeteries.
DATES: Comments must be received by
VA on or before August 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by email through https://
www.regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Regulation Policy
and Management (02REG), Department
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont
Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington,
DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AP74—Authority to Solicit Gifts and
Donations.’’ Copies of comments
received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation
Policy and Management, Room 1068,
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday (except
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for
an appointment. (This is not a toll-free
number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 132 (Monday, July 11, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44825-44827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16331]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0077]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone, Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air Show; Atlantic
Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the
waters of the Atlantic Ocean east of Daytona Beach, Florida during the
Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air Show. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters surrounding the
event. This safety zone will be enforced daily 11 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
from October 6 through October 9, 2016. This proposed rulemaking would
prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Jacksonville or a
designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0077 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Allan Storm, Sector
Jacksonville, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone (904) 714-7616, email Allan.H.Storm@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On December 15, 2015, Embry Riddle Aeronautical University/David
Schultz Airshows LLC submitted a marine event application to the Coast
Guard for the Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air Show that will take
place from October 6 through 9, 2016. The air show will consist of
various flight demonstrations over the Atlantic Ocean, just offshore
from Daytona Beach, FL. Over the years, there have been unfortunate
instances of aircraft mishaps that involve crashing during performances
at various air shows around the world. Occasionally, these incidents
result in a wide area of scattered debris in the water that can damage
property or cause significant injury or death to the public observing
[[Page 44826]]
the air shows from the water. The Captain of the Port (COTP)
Jacksonville has determined that a safety zone is necessary to protect
the general public from hazards associated with aerial flight
demonstrations.
The purpose of the rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and persons during the air show on the navigable waters of the Atlantic
Ocean in Daytona Beach, FL. The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 11 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. on October 6 through October 9, 2016. The safety zone will
encompass all waters within an area approximately two nautical miles
parallel to the shoreline, and one half nautical mile out into the
Atlantic Ocean offshore from Daytona Beach, Florida. The duration of
the zone is intended to ensure the safety of the public and these
navigable waters during the aerial flight demonstrations. No vessel or
person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory
text the Coast Guard is proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would
impact a small designated area of the Atlantic Ocean for five and a
half hours on each of the four days the air show is occurring.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue a broadcast notice to mariners
via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow
vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone that would prohibit persons and vessels from transiting through a
one square nautical mile regulated area during a four day air show
lasting five and a half hours daily. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary
environmental analysis checklist and Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
[[Page 44827]]
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T07-0077 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07-0077 Safety Zone; Daytona Beach Wings and Waves Air
Show, Atlantic Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL.
(a) Regulated Area. The following regulated area is a safety zone
located offshore from Daytona Beach, FL. All waters of the Atlantic
Ocean encompassed within an imaginary line connecting the following
points: Starting at Point 1 in position 29[deg]14'44.72'' N.,
081[deg]0'46.90'' W.; thence northeast to Point 2 in position
29[deg]14'58.74'' N., 081[deg]0'16.18'' W.; thence southeast to Point 3
in position 29[deg]13'3.80'' N., 080[deg]59'21.78'' W.; thence
southwest to Point 4 in position 29[deg]12'54.63'' N.,
080[deg]59'53.87'' W.; thence northwest back to origin. These
coordinates are based on North American Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Jacksonville in the enforcement of the regulated
area.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port
Jacksonville or a designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor
in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the
Port Jacksonville by telephone at 904-714-7557, or a designated
representative via VHF-FM radio on channel 16, to request
authorization. If authorization is granted, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions of the
COTP Jacksonville or a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area
through Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM channel 16 or by on-
scene designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced daily 11 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m. from October 6 through October 9, 2016.
Dated: June 27, 2016.
J.F. Dixon,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 2016-16331 Filed 7-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P