Authority To Solicit Gifts and Donations, 44827-44830 [2016-16232]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:20 Jul 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T07–0077 to read as
follows:
44827
p.m. from October 6 through October 9,
2016.
Dated: June 27, 2016.
J.F. Dixon,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Jacksonville.
[FR Doc. 2016–16331 Filed 7–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■
§ 165.T07–0077 Safety Zone; Daytona
Beach Wings and Waves Air Show, Atlantic
Ocean, Daytona Beach, FL.
(a) Regulated Area. The following
regulated area is a safety zone located
offshore from Daytona Beach, FL. All
waters of the Atlantic Ocean
encompassed within an imaginary line
connecting the following points:
Starting at Point 1 in position
29°14′44.72″ N., 081°0′46.90″ W.; thence
northeast to Point 2 in position
29°14′58.74″ N., 081°0′16.18″ W.; thence
southeast to Point 3 in position
29°13′3.80″ N., 080°59′21.78″ W.; thence
southwest to Point 4 in position
29°12′54.63″ N., 080°59′53.87″ W.;
thence northwest back to origin. These
coordinates are based on North
American Datum 1983.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Jacksonville in the
enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated area
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Jacksonville or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or
remain within the regulated area may
contact the Captain of the Port
Jacksonville by telephone at 904–714–
7557, or a designated representative via
VHF–FM radio on channel 16, to
request authorization. If authorization is
granted, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization must
comply with the instructions of the
COTP Jacksonville or a designated
representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area through
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM channel 16 or by on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced daily 11 a.m. to 4:30
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 38
RIN 2900–AP74
Authority To Solicit Gifts and
Donations
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is proposing to amend its
National Cemeteries regulation on the
prohibition of officials and employees of
VA from soliciting contributions from
the public or authorizing the use of their
names, name of the Secretary, or the
name of VA for the purpose of making
a gift or donation to VA. The amended
regulation would give the Under
Secretary of Memorial Affairs (USMA),
or his designee, authority to solicit gifts
and donations, which include monetary
donations, in-kind goods and services,
and personal property, or authorize the
use of their names, the name of the
Secretary, or the name of VA by an
individual or organization in any
campaign or drive for donation of
money or articles to VA for the purpose
of beautifying, or for the benefit of, one
or more national cemeteries.
DATES: Comments must be received by
VA on or before August 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be
submitted by email through https://
www.regulations.gov; by mail or handdelivery to Director, Regulation Policy
and Management (02REG), Department
of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont
Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington,
DC 20420; or by fax to (202) 273–9026.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AP74—Authority to Solicit Gifts and
Donations.’’ Copies of comments
received will be available for public
inspection in the Office of Regulation
Policy and Management, Room 1068,
between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday (except
holidays). Please call (202) 461–4902 for
an appointment. (This is not a toll-free
number.) In addition, during the
comment period, comments may be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
44828
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
viewed online through the Federal
Docket Management System (FDMS) at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Howard, Chief of Staff, National
Cemetery Administration (NCA),
Department of Veterans Affairs, (40A),
810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20420, (202) 461–6215. (This is not
a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 38
U.S.C. 2407 authorizes the Secretary of
VA to ‘‘accept gifts, devises, or bequests
from legitimate societies and
organizations or reputable individuals,
made in any manner, which are made
for the purpose of beautifying national
cemeteries, or are determined to be
beneficial to such cemetery.’’ In 1978,
VA published implementing regulations
for this authority at 38 CFR 1.603 (now
redesignated as 38 CFR 38.603). 43 FR
26572 (June 21, 1978). Included in this
regulation, at § 38.603(b), is a
prohibition on the solicitation of
contributions from the public by any VA
official or employee. Unfortunately, as
was common at the time, the proposed
and final rulemaking documents
provide less information regarding the
rationale for the regulations than is
commonly provided today, so the full
rationale for this regulation, including
the reason for the prohibition on
solicitations, is no longer available. The
prohibition is not contained in the
statutory authority at section 2407, nor
does the plain language of the statute
indicate a rationale for the prohibition.
We propose to ease this restriction
because it negatively impacts VA’s
ability to fully realize the potential of its
authority to accept gifts and donations
for the benefit of the national
cemeteries.
The gift and donation acceptance
authority at section 2407 is just one of
several authorities under which VA may
accept gifts or donations that advance
the mission or enhance the services that
VA provides. These authorities include,
among others, 38 U.S.C. 521 (acceptance
of funds to support recreational
activities furthering the rehabilitation of
disabled veterans); 2406 (gifts of land
for national cemeteries); 8103 and 8104
(acceptance of land, interests in land, or
facilities for use as medical facilities);
and 8301 (acceptance of gifts for use in
carrying out all laws administered by
VA). None of these statutory authorities
nor any implementing regulations for
any of the authorities, includes a
provision like that contained in
§ 38.603(b), prohibiting the solicitation
of contributions.
Legal guidance indicates that such a
prohibition is not required by law. In
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:20 Jul 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
2015, VA’s Office of General Counsel
(OGC) issued a precedent opinion
concluding that VA’s express statutory
authority to accept gifts under section
8301 included the implied statutory
authority to solicit those gifts.
VAOPGCPREC 2–2015, Mar. 20, 2015.
Outside VA, a 2001 opinion from the
Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) of the
Department of Justice found that the
broad statutory authority granted by
Congress in section 403(b)(1) of the
Office of Government Ethics
Authorization Act of 1996 to accept gifts
implies the authority to solicit gifts. 25
Op. OLC 55, Jan. 19, 2001. VA believes
that section 2407 similarly contains an
implied statutory authority to solicit
gifts and donations for the benefit of the
national cemeteries and that, by
prohibiting use of that implied statutory
authority, the provision in § 38.603(b),
in addition to not being legally
necessary, may impede VA’s ability to
fully realize the authority provided to
VA in section 2407. The ability of VA
to operate other gift and donation
programs under the authorities
mentioned above, effectively and within
legal parameters, in the absence of a
prohibition on the ability of principals
to solicit gifts and donations, indicates
that a prohibition like that contained in
§ 38.603(b) is unnecessary.
Gifts and donations received by the
national cemeteries under the authority
of section 2407 have taken many forms,
including monetary donations,
donations of services and property (such
as landscaping services or trees), and
memorials and other commemorative
works. Consistent with the plain
language of the terms ‘‘gifts’’ and
‘‘donations,’’ we would clarify in the
regulation that gifts and donations
include monetary donations, in-kind
goods and services, and personal
property. These gifts and donations
from generous persons and
organizations enhance the experience of
visitors to the national cemeteries. The
prohibition contained in § 38.603(b)
impedes VA’s ability to proactively
advise donors or potential donors of gift
and donation opportunities that could
be beneficial to the national cemeteries.
Although § 38.603(b) includes a
provision that allows VA employees to
discuss the ‘‘appropriateness’’ of a
proposed gift, that discussion can only
happen if a donor first approaches VA
about a potential gift or donation. VA
cannot proactively advise a donor that
a particular gift or donation would be
beneficial to the national cemeteries in
general or any one national cemetery in
particular. Easing the prohibition
benefits not only the national cemeteries
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
by ensuring that gifts and donations are
more likely to be beneficial, but also is
beneficial to donors who may not know
of opportunities to provide beneficial
gifts and donations to the national
cemeteries. Therefore, we would amend
§ 38.603(b) to provide that the USMA, or
his designee, may solicit gifts and
donations, which include monetary
donations, in-kind goods and services,
and personal property, or authorize the
use of their names, the name of the
Secretary, or the name of VA by an
individual or organization in any
campaign or drive for money or articles
to VA for the purpose of beautifying, or
for the benefit of, one or more national
cemeteries.
While VA would ease the prohibition
on solicitation of gifts and donations,
the intent is not to remove the
restriction in its entirety. VA maintains
133 national cemeteries, one national
Veterans’ burial ground, and 33 soldiers’
lots and monument sites in 40 states
and Puerto Rico, as national shrines,
that is, places of honor and memory
where visitors can sense the serenity,
historic sacrifice, and nobility of
purpose of those who have served in the
military. The USMA is responsible for
the operation of the national cemeteries
and is in the best position to determine
the appropriateness of any campaign to
solicit gifts and donations. Although VA
would replace the existing provision at
§ 38.603(b) with revised text that would
allow the USMA or designee to solicit
gifts and donations to VA for the
purpose of beautifying, or for the benefit
of, one or more national cemeteries, this
rulemaking would not amend any other
regulation governing solicitation or
acceptance of gifts and donations under
any other authority available to VA.
We propose to revise the authority
citation for part 38 to include the
statutory authority 38 U.S.C. 2407. We
also propose to add this statutory
authority at the end of § 38.603.
Administrative Procedure Act
Concurrent with this proposed rule,
we are also publishing a separate,
substantially identical direct final rule
in this Federal Register. See RIN 2900–
AP75. The simultaneous publication of
these documents will speed notice and
comment rulemaking under the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) should we have to withdraw the
direct final rule due to receipt of a
significant adverse comment.
For purposes of the direct final
rulemaking, a significant adverse
comment is one that explains why the
rule would be inappropriate, including
challenges to the rule’s underlying
premise or approach, or why it would
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
be ineffective or unacceptable without
change. If VA receives a significant
adverse comment, VA will publish a
notice of receipt of a significant adverse
comment in the Federal Register and
withdraw the direct final rule. In
determining whether an adverse
comment is significant and warrants
withdrawing a direct final rule, we will
consider whether the comment raises an
issue serious enough to warrant a
substantive response in a notice-andcomment process in accordance with
section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553). Comments
that are frivolous, insubstantial, or
outside the scope of the rule will not be
considered adverse under this
procedure. For example, a comment
recommending an additional change to
the rule will not be considered a
significant adverse comment unless the
comment states why the rule would be
ineffective or unacceptable without the
additional change.
Under direct final rule procedures, if
no significant adverse comment is
received within the comment period,
the direct final rule will become
effective on the date specified in RIN
2900–AP75. After the close of the
comment period, VA will publish a
document in the Federal Register
indicating that VA received no
significant adverse comments and
restating the date on which the final
rule will become effective. VA will also
publish a notice in the Federal Register
withdrawing this proposed rule.
In the event that VA withdraws the
direct final rule because of receipt of
any significant adverse comment, VA
will proceed with the rulemaking by
addressing the comments received and
publishing a final rule. The comment
period for this proposed rule runs
concurrently with that of the direct final
rule. VA will treat any comments
received in response to the direct final
rule as comments regarding this
proposed rule as well. VA will consider
such comments in developing a
subsequent final rule. Likewise, VA will
consider any significant adverse
comment received in response to the
proposed rule as a comment regarding
the direct final rule as well.
VA has determined that it is not
necessary to provide a 60-day comment
period for this rulemaking because the
rulemaking does not establish duties or
benefits affecting members of the public,
but merely makes a minor modification
concerning the authority of certain
officials or employees to solicit gifts and
donations for the benefit of VA national
cemeteries. VA has instead specified
that comments must be received within
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:20 Jul 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
30 days after date of publication in the
Federal Register.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, to
be revised by this proposed rulemaking,
would represent the exclusive legal
authority on this subject. No contrary
rules or procedures would be
authorized. All VA guidance would be
read to conform with this proposed
rulemaking if possible or, if not
possible, such guidance would be
superseded by this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
proposed rule would only affect
individuals and would not directly
affect small entities. Therefore, pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. Executive Order
12866 (Regulatory Planning and
Review) defines a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), unless OMB waives such
review, as ‘‘any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44829
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
Materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in this Executive
Order.’’
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action
have been examined, and it has been
determined not to be a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866. VA’s impact analysis can be
found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually
within 48 hours after the rulemaking
document is published. Additionally, a
copy of the rulemaking and its impact
analysis are available on VA’s Web site
at https://www.va.gov/orpm, by
following the link for ‘‘VA Regulations
Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal
Year to Date.’’
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
There are no Catalog of Federal
Domestic Assistance program numbers
and titles affected by this document.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina
S. Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on June 30,
2016, for publication.
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
44830
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 132 / Monday, July 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Dated: June 30, 2016.
Jeffrey Martin,
Office Program Manager, Office of Regulation
Policy & Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 38
Administrative practice and
procedure, Cemeteries, Claims, Crime,
Veterans.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 38 as follows:
PART 38—NATIONAL CEMETERIES
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
1. Revise the authority citation for part
38 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 107, 501, 512, 2306,
2402, 2403, 2404, 2407, 2408, 2411, 7105.
2. In § 38.603, revise paragraph (b)
and add an authority citaiton to read as
follows:
■
§ 38.603
Gifts and donations.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The Under Secretary of Memorial
Affairs, or his designee, may solicit gifts
and donations, which include monetary
donations, in-kind goods and services,
and personal property, or authorize the
use of their names, the name of the
Secretary, or the name of the
Department of Veterans Affairs by an
individual or organization in any
campaign or drive for donation of
money or articles to the Department of
Veterans Affairs for the purpose of
beautifying, or for the benefit of, one or
more national cemeteries.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 2407)
[FR Doc. 2016–16232 Filed 7–8–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
[EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0313; FRL–9948–83–
Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; State of
Kansas; Infrastructure SIP
Requirements for the 2012 Annual Fine
Particulate Matter (PM2.5) National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:20 Jul 08, 2016
Jkt 238001
elements of a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submission from the State of
Kansas addressing the applicable
requirements of Clean Air Act (CAA)
section 110 for the 2012 annual PM2.5
NAAQS. Section 110 requires that each
state adopt and submit a SIP to support
the implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of each new or revised
NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. These
SIPs are commonly referred to as
‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The infrastructure
requirements are designed to ensure that
the structural components of each
state’s air quality management program
are adequate to meet the state’s
responsibilities under the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2016–0313, to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather Hamilton, Air Planning and
Development Branch, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 7, 11201 Renner Boulevard,
Lenexa, KS 66219 at (913) 551–7039, or
by email at hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we refer
to EPA. A detailed technical support
document (TSD) is included in this
rulemaking docket to address the
following: a description of CAA section
110(a)(1) and (2) infrastructure SIPs; the
applicable elements under sections
110(a)(1) and (2); EPA’s approach to the
review of infrastructure SIP
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submissions, and EPA’s evaluation of
how Kansas addressed the relevant
elements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2).
This section provides additional
information by addressing the following
questions:
I. What is being addressed in this document?
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. What action is EPA taking?
I. What is being addressed in this
document?
EPA is proposing to approve the
infrastructure SIP submission received
from the State of Kansas on November
25, 2015. The infrastructure SIP
submission addresses the requirements
of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as
applicable to the 2012 annual PM2.5
NAAQS. A TSD is included as part of
the docket to discuss the details of this
proposal, including an analysis of how
the SIP meets the applicable 110
requirements for infrastructure SIPs.
II. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. In addition, as
explained above and in more detail in
the TSD which is part of this docket, the
revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including
section 110 and implementing
regulations.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve the
November 25, 2015, infrastructure SIP
submission from the State of Kansas
which addresses the requirements of
CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as
applicable to the 2012 annual PM2.5
NAAQS. The EPA’s analysis of the
submission is addressed in a TSD as
part of the docket to discuss the
proposal.
Based upon review of the state’s
infrastructure SIP submissions and
relevant statutory and regulatory
authorities and provisions referenced in
those submissions or referenced in
Kansas’ SIP, EPA believes that Kansas’
SIP will meet all applicable required
elements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2)
with respect to the 2012 annual PM2.5
NAAQS.
We are processing this as a proposed
action because we are soliciting
comments on this proposed action.
Final rulemaking will occur after
consideration of any comments.
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 132 (Monday, July 11, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44827-44830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16232]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 38
RIN 2900-AP74
Authority To Solicit Gifts and Donations
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is proposing to amend
its National Cemeteries regulation on the prohibition of officials and
employees of VA from soliciting contributions from the public or
authorizing the use of their names, name of the Secretary, or the name
of VA for the purpose of making a gift or donation to VA. The amended
regulation would give the Under Secretary of Memorial Affairs (USMA),
or his designee, authority to solicit gifts and donations, which
include monetary donations, in-kind goods and services, and personal
property, or authorize the use of their names, the name of the
Secretary, or the name of VA by an individual or organization in any
campaign or drive for donation of money or articles to VA for the
purpose of beautifying, or for the benefit of, one or more national
cemeteries.
DATES: Comments must be received by VA on or before August 10, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Written comments may be submitted by email through https://www.regulations.gov; by mail or hand-delivery to Director, Regulation
Policy and Management (02REG), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW., Room 1068, Washington, DC 20420; or by fax to (202)
273-9026. (This is not a toll-free number.) Comments should indicate
that they are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AP74--Authority to
Solicit Gifts and Donations.'' Copies of comments received will be
available for public inspection in the Office of Regulation Policy and
Management, Room 1068, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday (except holidays). Please call (202) 461-4902 for
an appointment. (This is not a toll-free number.) In addition, during
the comment period, comments may be
[[Page 44828]]
viewed online through the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) at
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Howard, Chief of Staff,
National Cemetery Administration (NCA), Department of Veterans Affairs,
(40A), 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-6215.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 38 U.S.C. 2407 authorizes the
Secretary of VA to ``accept gifts, devises, or bequests from legitimate
societies and organizations or reputable individuals, made in any
manner, which are made for the purpose of beautifying national
cemeteries, or are determined to be beneficial to such cemetery.'' In
1978, VA published implementing regulations for this authority at 38
CFR 1.603 (now redesignated as 38 CFR 38.603). 43 FR 26572 (June 21,
1978). Included in this regulation, at Sec. 38.603(b), is a
prohibition on the solicitation of contributions from the public by any
VA official or employee. Unfortunately, as was common at the time, the
proposed and final rulemaking documents provide less information
regarding the rationale for the regulations than is commonly provided
today, so the full rationale for this regulation, including the reason
for the prohibition on solicitations, is no longer available. The
prohibition is not contained in the statutory authority at section
2407, nor does the plain language of the statute indicate a rationale
for the prohibition. We propose to ease this restriction because it
negatively impacts VA's ability to fully realize the potential of its
authority to accept gifts and donations for the benefit of the national
cemeteries.
The gift and donation acceptance authority at section 2407 is just
one of several authorities under which VA may accept gifts or donations
that advance the mission or enhance the services that VA provides.
These authorities include, among others, 38 U.S.C. 521 (acceptance of
funds to support recreational activities furthering the rehabilitation
of disabled veterans); 2406 (gifts of land for national cemeteries);
8103 and 8104 (acceptance of land, interests in land, or facilities for
use as medical facilities); and 8301 (acceptance of gifts for use in
carrying out all laws administered by VA). None of these statutory
authorities nor any implementing regulations for any of the
authorities, includes a provision like that contained in Sec.
38.603(b), prohibiting the solicitation of contributions.
Legal guidance indicates that such a prohibition is not required by
law. In 2015, VA's Office of General Counsel (OGC) issued a precedent
opinion concluding that VA's express statutory authority to accept
gifts under section 8301 included the implied statutory authority to
solicit those gifts. VAOPGCPREC 2-2015, Mar. 20, 2015. Outside VA, a
2001 opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) of the Department
of Justice found that the broad statutory authority granted by Congress
in section 403(b)(1) of the Office of Government Ethics Authorization
Act of 1996 to accept gifts implies the authority to solicit gifts. 25
Op. OLC 55, Jan. 19, 2001. VA believes that section 2407 similarly
contains an implied statutory authority to solicit gifts and donations
for the benefit of the national cemeteries and that, by prohibiting use
of that implied statutory authority, the provision in Sec. 38.603(b),
in addition to not being legally necessary, may impede VA's ability to
fully realize the authority provided to VA in section 2407. The ability
of VA to operate other gift and donation programs under the authorities
mentioned above, effectively and within legal parameters, in the
absence of a prohibition on the ability of principals to solicit gifts
and donations, indicates that a prohibition like that contained in
Sec. 38.603(b) is unnecessary.
Gifts and donations received by the national cemeteries under the
authority of section 2407 have taken many forms, including monetary
donations, donations of services and property (such as landscaping
services or trees), and memorials and other commemorative works.
Consistent with the plain language of the terms ``gifts'' and
``donations,'' we would clarify in the regulation that gifts and
donations include monetary donations, in-kind goods and services, and
personal property. These gifts and donations from generous persons and
organizations enhance the experience of visitors to the national
cemeteries. The prohibition contained in Sec. 38.603(b) impedes VA's
ability to proactively advise donors or potential donors of gift and
donation opportunities that could be beneficial to the national
cemeteries. Although Sec. 38.603(b) includes a provision that allows
VA employees to discuss the ``appropriateness'' of a proposed gift,
that discussion can only happen if a donor first approaches VA about a
potential gift or donation. VA cannot proactively advise a donor that a
particular gift or donation would be beneficial to the national
cemeteries in general or any one national cemetery in particular.
Easing the prohibition benefits not only the national cemeteries by
ensuring that gifts and donations are more likely to be beneficial, but
also is beneficial to donors who may not know of opportunities to
provide beneficial gifts and donations to the national cemeteries.
Therefore, we would amend Sec. 38.603(b) to provide that the USMA, or
his designee, may solicit gifts and donations, which include monetary
donations, in-kind goods and services, and personal property, or
authorize the use of their names, the name of the Secretary, or the
name of VA by an individual or organization in any campaign or drive
for money or articles to VA for the purpose of beautifying, or for the
benefit of, one or more national cemeteries.
While VA would ease the prohibition on solicitation of gifts and
donations, the intent is not to remove the restriction in its entirety.
VA maintains 133 national cemeteries, one national Veterans' burial
ground, and 33 soldiers' lots and monument sites in 40 states and
Puerto Rico, as national shrines, that is, places of honor and memory
where visitors can sense the serenity, historic sacrifice, and nobility
of purpose of those who have served in the military. The USMA is
responsible for the operation of the national cemeteries and is in the
best position to determine the appropriateness of any campaign to
solicit gifts and donations. Although VA would replace the existing
provision at Sec. 38.603(b) with revised text that would allow the
USMA or designee to solicit gifts and donations to VA for the purpose
of beautifying, or for the benefit of, one or more national cemeteries,
this rulemaking would not amend any other regulation governing
solicitation or acceptance of gifts and donations under any other
authority available to VA.
We propose to revise the authority citation for part 38 to include
the statutory authority 38 U.S.C. 2407. We also propose to add this
statutory authority at the end of Sec. 38.603.
Administrative Procedure Act
Concurrent with this proposed rule, we are also publishing a
separate, substantially identical direct final rule in this Federal
Register. See RIN 2900-AP75. The simultaneous publication of these
documents will speed notice and comment rulemaking under the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) should we have to withdraw
the direct final rule due to receipt of a significant adverse comment.
For purposes of the direct final rulemaking, a significant adverse
comment is one that explains why the rule would be inappropriate,
including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or
why it would
[[Page 44829]]
be ineffective or unacceptable without change. If VA receives a
significant adverse comment, VA will publish a notice of receipt of a
significant adverse comment in the Federal Register and withdraw the
direct final rule. In determining whether an adverse comment is
significant and warrants withdrawing a direct final rule, we will
consider whether the comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant
a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process in accordance
with section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553).
Comments that are frivolous, insubstantial, or outside the scope of the
rule will not be considered adverse under this procedure. For example,
a comment recommending an additional change to the rule will not be
considered a significant adverse comment unless the comment states why
the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable without the additional
change.
Under direct final rule procedures, if no significant adverse
comment is received within the comment period, the direct final rule
will become effective on the date specified in RIN 2900-AP75. After the
close of the comment period, VA will publish a document in the Federal
Register indicating that VA received no significant adverse comments
and restating the date on which the final rule will become effective.
VA will also publish a notice in the Federal Register withdrawing this
proposed rule.
In the event that VA withdraws the direct final rule because of
receipt of any significant adverse comment, VA will proceed with the
rulemaking by addressing the comments received and publishing a final
rule. The comment period for this proposed rule runs concurrently with
that of the direct final rule. VA will treat any comments received in
response to the direct final rule as comments regarding this proposed
rule as well. VA will consider such comments in developing a subsequent
final rule. Likewise, VA will consider any significant adverse comment
received in response to the proposed rule as a comment regarding the
direct final rule as well.
VA has determined that it is not necessary to provide a 60-day
comment period for this rulemaking because the rulemaking does not
establish duties or benefits affecting members of the public, but
merely makes a minor modification concerning the authority of certain
officials or employees to solicit gifts and donations for the benefit
of VA national cemeteries. VA has instead specified that comments must
be received within 30 days after date of publication in the Federal
Register.
Effect of Rulemaking
The Code of Federal Regulations, to be revised by this proposed
rulemaking, would represent the exclusive legal authority on this
subject. No contrary rules or procedures would be authorized. All VA
guidance would be read to conform with this proposed rulemaking if
possible or, if not possible, such guidance would be superseded by this
rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection
of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501-3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This proposed rule would only affect individuals and
would not directly affect small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this rulemaking is exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review) defines a
``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), unless OMB waives such review, as ``any
regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have
an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2)
Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the
rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal
or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's
priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.''
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this regulatory action have been examined, and it has
been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866. VA's impact analysis can be found as a
supporting document at https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy
of the rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's Web
site at https://www.va.gov/orpm, by following the link for ``VA
Regulations Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.''
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
There are no Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers
and titles affected by this document.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Gina S.
Farrisee, Deputy Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on June 30, 2016, for publication.
[[Page 44830]]
Dated: June 30, 2016.
Jeffrey Martin,
Office Program Manager, Office of Regulation Policy & Management,
Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 38
Administrative practice and procedure, Cemeteries, Claims, Crime,
Veterans.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 38 as follows:
PART 38--NATIONAL CEMETERIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
0
1. Revise the authority citation for part 38 to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 107, 501, 512, 2306, 2402, 2403, 2404,
2407, 2408, 2411, 7105.
0
2. In Sec. 38.603, revise paragraph (b) and add an authority citaiton
to read as follows:
Sec. 38.603 Gifts and donations.
* * * * *
(b) The Under Secretary of Memorial Affairs, or his designee, may
solicit gifts and donations, which include monetary donations, in-kind
goods and services, and personal property, or authorize the use of
their names, the name of the Secretary, or the name of the Department
of Veterans Affairs by an individual or organization in any campaign or
drive for donation of money or articles to the Department of Veterans
Affairs for the purpose of beautifying, or for the benefit of, one or
more national cemeteries.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 2407)
[FR Doc. 2016-16232 Filed 7-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P