Method of Accounting for Gains and Losses on Shares in Money Market Funds; Broker Returns With Respect to Sales of Shares in Money Market Funds, 44508-44515 [2016-16149]
Download as PDF
44508
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair
required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (j)(4)(i) and (j)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Gaetano Settineri, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM 120S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–
3356; phone: 425–917–6577; fax: 425–917–
6590; email: gaetano.settineri@faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737–
55A1097, dated July 1, 2015.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For Boeing service information
identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data &
Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC
2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone
206–544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–
5680; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:29 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 23,
2016.
Dorr M. Anderson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–15904 Filed 7–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9774]
RIN 1545–BM04
Method of Accounting for Gains and
Losses on Shares in Money Market
Funds; Broker Returns With Respect
to Sales of Shares in Money Market
Funds
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
regulations that provide a simplified
method of accounting for gains and
losses on shares in money market funds
(MMFs). The final regulations also
provide guidance regarding information
reporting requirements for shares in
MMFs. The final regulations respond to
Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) rules that change the amount for
which certain MMF shares are
distributed, redeemed, and repurchased.
The final regulations affect MMFs and
their shareholders.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations
are effective on July 8, 2016.
Applicability dates: For the dates of
applicability, see §§ 1.446–7(e) and
1.6045–1(c)(3)(vi)(B).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Grace Cho at (202) 317–6895 (not a tollfree number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
This document contains amendments
to 26 CFR part 1 (Income Tax
Regulations) under sections 446 and
6045 of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). The regulations provide a
method of accounting for gain or loss on
shares in MMFs and are intended to
simplify tax compliance for holders of
shares in MMFs affected by SEC
regulations that impose liquidity fees or
change how certain MMF shares are
priced. See Money Market Fund Reform;
Amendments to Form PF, Securities Act
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Release No. 33–9616, Investment
Advisers Act Release No. IA–3879,
Investment Company Act Release No.
IC–31166, Financial Reporting
Codification No. FR–84 (August 14,
2014) (SEC MMF Reform Rules). The
regulations also provide guidance
regarding information reporting
requirements for shares in MMFs.
An MMF is a type of investment
company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940
Act) and regulated as an MMF under
Rule 2a–7 under the 1940 Act (17 CFR
270.2a–7). MMFs have historically
sought to keep stable the prices at which
their shares are distributed, redeemed,
and repurchased. The securities that
Rule 2a–7 permits an MMF to hold
generally result in no more than
minimal fluctuations in the MMF’s net
asset value per share (NAV).1
MMFs meeting the requirements of
Rule 2a–7 have been permitted to value
their assets based on the assets’ cost,
with certain adjustments (amortized
cost method), and to price their shares
by rounding the resulting NAV to the
nearest 1 percent (penny rounding).
These methods have enabled MMFs to
maintain constant share prices in almost
all circumstances. Because most MMFs
target a $1.00 share price, an MMF that
fails to maintain a constant share price
is said to ‘‘break the buck.’’
The SEC MMF Reform Rules generally
bar the use of the amortized cost method
and penny rounding for certain MMFs
(floating-NAV MMFs) and require a
floating-NAV MMF to value its assets
using market factors and to round its
price per share to the nearest basis point
(the fourth decimal place, in the case of
a fund with a $1.0000 share price).
Certain government-security-focused
MMFs (government MMFs) and certain
MMFs the beneficial owners of which
are limited to natural persons (retail
MMFs) may continue to use the
amortized cost method and penny
rounding. (A government MMF or retail
MMF that continues to use the
amortized cost method and penny
rounding is called a stable-NAV MMF.)
The SEC MMF Reform Rules also
establish circumstances under which an
MMF is permitted or required to impose
a liquidity fee or is permitted to impose
a redemption gate. When an MMF has
a liquidity fee in effect, the liquidity fee
reduces the proceeds received by all
redeeming shareholders. A redemption
gate is the temporary suspension of
redemptions of shares in the MMF.
Liquidity fees and redemption gates
1 Note that the term ‘‘NAV’’ is used throughout
this document to indicate the per-share amount that
may be described elsewhere as ‘‘NAV per share.’’
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
may be imposed by both floating-NAV
MMFs and stable-NAV MMFs. An MMF
other than a government MMF is
required to impose a liquidity fee in
certain circumstances, unless the fund’s
board of directors determines that such
a fee is not in the best interests of the
fund.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking and notice of public hearing
(REG–107012–14) in the Federal
Register on July 28, 2014 (79 FR 43694).
The proposed regulations described a
simplified method of accounting for
gain or loss on shares in a floating-NAV
MMF (the net asset value method, or
NAV method). Under the NAV method,
a taxpayer’s gain or loss on shares in an
MMF is based on the change in the
aggregate value of the taxpayer’s shares
during a computation period selected by
the taxpayer and on the net amount of
the purchases and redemptions during
the computation period. The proposed
regulations also provided guidance
regarding information reporting
requirements for shares in MMFs.
A request for a public hearing was
received, and the hearing was held on
November 19, 2014. The IRS received
written comments responding to the
proposed regulations regarding the
method of accounting for gains and
losses on shares in MMFs. The written
comments are available for public
inspection at https://
www.regulations.gov or upon request.
After considering the comments, the
Treasury Department and the IRS adopt
the proposed regulations regarding the
method of accounting as final
regulations with the modifications
described in this Treasury decision. No
comments were received on the portion
of the proposed regulations that would
revise § 1.6045–1(c)(3)(vi) to clarify that
the exceptions under sections 6045,
6045A, and 6045B continue to apply to
all MMFs, including floating-NAV
MMFs. The Treasury Department and
the IRS adopt the proposed regulations
revising § 1.6045–1(c)(3)(vi) as final
regulations without substantive change.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions
1. Application of the NAV Method to
Stable-NAV MMFs
Under the proposed regulations, the
NAV method would apply only to
floating-NAV MMF shares. In the
preamble to the proposed regulations,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
requested comments regarding whether
the NAV method should be a
permissible method of accounting for
stable-NAV MMF shares.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:29 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
Although stable-NAV MMFs seek to
maintain constant share prices, there are
circumstances in which shares in a
stable-NAV MMF will give rise to gain
or loss. On rare occasions, shares in a
stable-NAV MMF may be redeemed at a
price other than the target price, such as
when the MMF breaks the buck. In
addition, a stable-NAV MMF may
impose liquidity fees, which will
generally result in the realization of a
loss by a redeeming shareholder. If the
acquisition of other shares causes such
a redemption to be a wash sale under
section 1091, section 1091(d) will
generally cause the basis of the acquired
shares to exceed the cost of the shares.
Because the price of a stable-NAV MMF
share rarely changes, any disposition of
those acquired, higher-basis shares will
likely result in another loss, which also
may be deferred by the wash sale rules.
Therefore, even if a liquidity fee is in
effect for only one redemption by a
shareholder and the share price of the
MMF remains constant, that fee may
cause a difference between the basis and
value of the shareholder’s MMF shares
that persists indefinitely. Determining
gain or loss and basis on each
transaction in a stable-NAV MMF,
taking into account the wash sale rules,
would impose significant burdens on
shareholders under these circumstances.
To eliminate those burdens, a
shareholder might need to terminate the
shareholder’s entire interest in the
affected MMF (and not initiate a new
position until after the end of the period
described in section 1091(a)).
Commenters recommended that the
NAV method be applicable not only to
shares in floating-NAV MMFs but also
to shares in stable-NAV MMFs. The
commenters added that many
shareholders of stable-NAV MMFs may
be retail shareholders (generally,
individuals) who are likely to rely upon
the cost basis reporting provided by
funds or brokers for their other mutual
funds. Those individuals are unlikely to
have the systems necessary to record
gains and losses and to track wash sales
and the resulting basis adjustments.
The NAV method would reduce the
complexity, and any tax-based
motivation to terminate investments in
MMFs, that would result from the
imposition of a liquidity fee by a stableNAV MMF. Under the NAV method,
any loss that resulted from the
imposition of a liquidity fee by an MMF
would be determined for a shareholder’s
entire interest in the MMF (or in an
account) for the appropriate taxable year
(or computation period) rather than for
a single transaction. Therefore, the wash
sale rules would not defer the loss. The
NAV method also requires fewer and
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44509
simpler computations than traditional
accounting, even if there are no wash
sales. For the years after an MMF breaks
the buck or imposes a liquidity fee, the
NAV method simplifies recordkeeping,
because the gain or loss for each year is
based on changes in the NAV during
that year. Therefore, the final
regulations permit taxpayers to apply
the NAV method to shares in stableNAV MMFs.
2. Consistency Requirement
The proposed regulations would
provide that if a taxpayer applies the
NAV method to shares in any MMF for
a taxable year, the taxpayer must apply
the NAV method to its shares in all
MMFs for which that method is
permissible.
Commenters requested that the final
regulations permit taxpayers to apply
different methods to shares in different
MMFs or to shares in a single MMF held
in different accounts. Commenters said
that some taxpayers may receive
sufficient information about their shares
in certain MMFs to compute gain or loss
realized on each transaction and that
those taxpayers should be permitted to
compute gain or loss realized on each
transaction for those MMFs.
Commenters also noted that taxpayers
may hold shares in a single MMF
through different kinds of accounts (for
example, an account with a broker and
an account with the MMF itself) and
may receive different information for
the different accounts. The commenters
recommended that, because of that
possibility, taxpayers should be
permitted to use different accounting
methods for shares held in different
accounts. Commenters also noted that
many MMF shareholders will be large
institutional investors, which might
hold shares in the same MMF through
separate accounts controlled by
different divisions.
In response to these comments, the
final regulations permit MMF
shareholders to use different methods of
accounting for shares in different MMFs
or for shares in a single MMF held in
different accounts.
3. Choosing NAV Method Computation
Periods for RIC Excise Tax Purposes
Under the NAV method, computation
periods are the periods that a taxpayer
selects for computing gain and loss for
an MMF. The proposed regulations
would provide that computation periods
may be the taxpayer’s taxable year or a
shorter period, provided that (i)
computation periods are of
approximately equal duration, (ii) every
day during the taxable year falls within
one, and only one, computation period,
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
44510
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
and (iii) each computation period
contains days from only one taxable
year.
Most regulated investment companies
(RICs) must pay an excise tax under
section 4982 if they do not make the
required distribution described in
section 4982(b) for a calendar year. The
required distribution is generally 98
percent of the RIC’s ordinary income for
the calendar year, plus 98.2 percent of
the RIC’s capital gain net income for the
one-year period ending on October 31 of
the calendar year. A commenter
requested clarification that a RIC that
holds MMF shares may use the NAV
method for excise tax computations.
That commenter also requested that the
Treasury Department and the IRS
confirm that a RIC that uses the NAV
method is permitted to use the one-year
period from November 1 to October 31
as its computation period for excise tax
purposes. The commenter explained
that RICs generally account for items
that are marked to market using two
different one-year periods for income
tax and excise tax purposes. The
commenter explained that, under
section 4982(e)(2)(A), the term ‘‘capital
gain net income’’ when used in section
4982 is determined by treating the oneyear period ending on October 31 of any
calendar year as the company’s taxable
year.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
agree that the NAV method should be
applicable for purposes of the
computations required by section 4982
and that the taxable year for purposes of
those computations should be the
relevant period under section 4982(e).
The final regulations adopt this change.
The final regulations, however,
require a RIC to be consistent in
applying the NAV method to MMF
shares for income tax and excise tax
purposes. For each MMF in each
account, the final regulations generally
require a RIC to use the NAV method
either for both income tax and excise tax
computations or for neither
computation. The final regulations also
clarify how a RIC may change to or from
the NAV method.
The final regulations require a RIC to
use the same computation periods for
purposes of both excise tax and income
tax computations. Therefore, under the
final regulations, a RIC using the NAV
method for its shares in an MMF
generally treats the one-year period for
which gain or loss from the MMF would
be included in the amount determined
under section 4982(e)(2) or (e)(6) (the
section 4982 period) like a taxable year
in applying the NAV method to
determine the RIC’s required
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:29 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
distribution under section 4982(b).2 The
RIC, however, may not use the section
4982 period as a computation period for
excise tax purposes if the section 4982
period contains days from more than
one income tax year.3 Instead, in this
situation, the RIC must divide the
section 4982 period into at least two
computation periods so that each
computation period contains days from
only one income tax year. Similarly, the
RIC may not use its full income tax year
as a computation period for income tax
purposes if the year contains days from
more than one section 4982 period.
These consistency requirements
simplify and clarify the interaction of
sections 852(b) and 4982.
The final regulations eliminate the
requirement that computation periods
be of approximately equal duration. The
Treasury Department and the IRS do not
believe that this requirement is essential
to the operation of the NAV method,
and eliminating the requirement will
allow taxpayers more flexibility. In
particular, permitting computation
periods of unequal duration will reduce
the burden on RICs of complying with
the requirement of consistent
computation periods for income and
excise tax purposes. For example, a RIC
that applies the NAV method to its
shares in an MMF (held as a capital
asset) and that has an income tax year
ending on January 31 may meet the
consistency requirements with two
computation periods of unequal
duration—one ending on January 31 and
the other on October 31. The RIC also
may use additional computation periods
ending on other dates, such as
December 31.
4. Clarification of Certain Amounts
A. Fair Market Value of MMF Shares
Under the proposed regulations, gain
and loss under the NAV method would
be determined by reference to the fair
market value of MMF shares.
Commenters requested that the Treasury
Department and the IRS clarify that the
fair market value of an MMF share for
this purpose is the NAV reported by the
MMF. One commenter suggested that
the fair market value of a share in an
MMF should be the published NAV as
2 If a RIC has not made an election under section
4982(e)(4), the RIC’s section 4982 period is the oneyear period ending on October 31, because that is
the period for determining capital gain net income
under section 4982(e)(2) and (because the final
regulations concerning the NAV method constitute
a specified mark to market provision for purposes
of section 4982(e)(6)(B)) ordinary income under
4982(e)(6)(A).
3 The section 4982 period will contain days from
only one income tax year if (i) the RIC has in effect
a valid election under section 4982(e)(4) or (ii) the
RIC’s income tax year ends on October 31.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the end of the relevant day (or the
next trading day, if the day in question
is not a trading day). A second
commenter suggested that, because
MMFs may strike several NAVs
throughout the day, the fair market
value should be the next published
NAV after a transaction.
In response to these comments, the
final regulations clarify that the fair
market value of a share in an MMF at
the time of a transaction is presumed to
be the published NAV (or other
published amount for which the MMF
would redeem the share, determined
without regard to any liquidity fees
(other redemption amount)). For
purposes of computing the ending value
for a computation period, the
presumption applies to the last
published NAV (or other redemption
amount) in that computation period. For
purposes of determining the fair market
value of MMF shares surrendered or
received in a redemption or exchange,
the presumption generally applies to the
NAV (or other redemption amount) used
to determine the consideration received
in the transaction, or if the
consideration is not based on a
published NAV (or other redemption
amount), the first NAV (or other
redemption amount) published for the
MMF shares after the transaction. If no
NAV (or other redemption amount) is
published, or if facts and circumstances
indicate that the NAV (or other
redemption amount) does not represent
the fair market value of a share in the
MMF, the fair market value is
determined on the basis of all the facts
and circumstances.
B. Aggregate Amount Received
Under the proposed regulations, a
taxpayer’s net investment in an MMF
for a computation period would equal
the aggregate cost of shares in the MMF
purchased during the computation
period, minus the aggregate amount
received during the computation period
in redemption of shares in the MMF,
subject to certain adjustments. A
commenter suggested that the final
regulations clarify that the aggregate
amount received is based on: (i) If cash
is received, the cash proceeds, (ii) if
shares in another MMF are received, the
published NAV of the shares received as
of the end of the day on which the
redemption or exchange occurs (or the
next trading day, if the day in question
is not a trading day), or (iii) if other noncash property is received, the NAV of
the redeemed or exchanged shares as of
the end of the day on which the
redemption or exchange occurs (or the
next trading day if the day in question
is not a trading day or, if the fund will
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
not publish a NAV on or after the end
of the day on which the redemption or
exchange occurs, the fund’s last
published NAV).
The final regulations include
provisions for determining the amount
received for purposes of computing a
taxpayer’s net investment in an MMF
for a computation period. If the
consideration received in exchange for
an MMF share consists only of cash,
other MMF shares, or both, the amount
received is the amount of any cash plus
the fair market value of any MMF shares
received. If the consideration includes
any property other than cash or MMF
shares, the amount received is
determined by reference to the fair
market value of the surrendered MMF
shares.
The same commenter recommended
that a phrase in § 1.446–7(b)(5)(i)(B) of
the proposed regulations, ‘‘if the
transaction is one in which gain or loss
would be recognized,’’ be clarified to
indicate that it refers to recognition of
gain or loss other than pursuant to the
NAV method. The final regulations
make this clarification.
C. Substituted Basis
Under the proposed regulations, a
taxpayer’s net investment would
increase if, during the computation
period, the taxpayer acquired any shares
in an MMF other than by purchase. In
such cases, the net investment increases
by the adjusted basis (for purposes of
determining loss) of each such share
immediately after its acquisition. The
proposed regulations would also
provide that if that adjusted basis would
be determined by reference to the basis
of one or more shares in an MMF that
are being disposed of by the taxpayer in
a transaction in which gain or loss is not
recognized (exchanged basis), then the
basis of each such disposed share is
treated as being the fair market value of
that share at the time of its disposition.
A commenter noted that the proposed
regulations do not address a situation in
which the shareholder receives a
transferred basis in MMF shares
acquired from another person. The
commenter suggested that, in that
situation, if the person from whom the
shareholder acquired the shares used
the NAV method, then the adjusted
basis of the acquired shares should be
treated as the published NAV applicable
to the acquisition date.
The final regulations clarify the effect
on net investment of a share acquired
from another person with a transferred
basis. Similar to the commenter’s
suggestion, the final regulations provide
that, if a shareholder receives a
transferred basis in one or more
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:29 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
acquired MMF shares and the person
from whom the shareholder acquired
the shares used the NAV method, then
the adjusted basis of the acquired shares
will be their fair market value at the
time of the acquisition, which value is
presumed to be the next NAV (or other
redemption amount) published by the
MMF.
5. MMF Accounts With Shares of Mixed
Character
The proposed regulations would
provide that if a taxpayer uses the NAV
method for shares in an MMF and each
of those shares otherwise would give
rise to capital gain or loss if sold or
exchanged in a computation period,
then the gain or loss from the shares in
the MMF is treated as capital gain or
loss under the NAV method. Likewise,
if each of the shares otherwise would
give rise to ordinary gain or loss if sold
or exchanged in a computation period,
then the gain or loss is treated as
ordinary gain or loss. If, however, the
sale of all of the shares in the MMF
would give rise to a combination of
ordinary gain or loss and capital gain or
loss if sold or exchanged in a
computation period, then all gain or loss
from the shares in the MMF is treated
as capital gain or loss.
A commenter noted that the proposed
regulations do not explain why all gain
or loss should be treated as capital in
the case of an account containing MMF
shares of mixed character. The
commenter recommended that the
character of gain or loss with respect to
a mixed character account be bifurcated
based on the portion of the shares that
would generate gain or loss of each
character.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
believe that it is rare for a shareholder
to hold shares of a single MMF the
disposition of which would produce a
mix of ordinary income and capital
gain. Under that circumstance, a
taxpayer may use different accounts to
preserve the character of the shares that
would produce ordinary income and
capital gain. The purpose of the NAV
method is to provide an alternative to
traditional accounting for taxpayers
seeking simplicity. The rationale for
offering a method solely for MMFs is
that the value of MMFs fluctuates so
little that simplicity is more important
than tracking each individual gain or
loss. A rule that bifurcates gain or loss
based on the value of the shares in a
single account, when those values may
change during a computation period,
would make the NAV method more
complex. That additional complexity is
not warranted in light of the rarity of the
circumstance the proposed bifurcation
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44511
would address and the ability of
shareholders to prevent the treatment of
all gain or loss as capital by using
separate accounts. Therefore, the final
regulations retain the simplifying rule
for mixed-character accounts.
6. Other Requests and Comments
A. Wash Sale Rules Exemption for
Stable-NAV MMFs
Concurrently with the release of the
proposed regulations, the Treasury
Department and the IRS released Rev.
Proc. 2014–45 (2014–34 IRB 388), which
provides that the wash sale rules in
section 1091 will not be applied to
redemptions of shares in floating-NAV
MMFs. Commenters requested that the
wash sale exemption, which is limited
to floating-NAV MMFs, be extended to
stable-NAV MMFs that impose liquidity
fees.
The final regulations permit
shareholders of stable-NAV MMFs to
use the NAV method. A shareholder
who uses the NAV method would not
require an exemption from the wash
sale rules because under the NAV
method, net gain or loss is determined
for each computation period, and no
gain or loss is determined for any
particular redemption of a taxpayer’s
shares in an MMF. Without a
determination of loss for a particular
redemption, that redemption does not
implicate the wash sale rules. Because
taxpayers may use the NAV method to
prevent wash sales, the Treasury
Department and IRS are not extending
the exemption in Rev. Proc. 2014–45 to
stable-NAV MMFs.
B. Other Requests
A commenter requested that the
Treasury Department and the IRS issue
guidance regarding the tax treatment of
an MMF’s receipt of financial support
from an investment adviser to raise the
NAV of the MMF (determined without
the amortized cost method or penny
rounding) to $1.0000. In addition, the
commenter requested guidance
regarding the diversification
requirements of section 817(h) for a
segregated asset account that qualifies
as, or invests in, a government MMF. On
May 5, 2016, the Treasury Department
and the IRS released guidance related to
both of these requests. See Rev. Proc.
2016–31 (2016–21 IRB 988); Notice
2016–32 (2016–21 IRB 878).
The commenter also requested (and
later withdrew its request) that the
Treasury Department and the IRS issue
guidance providing tax-free treatment
for certain divisions of MMFs into retail
and institutional MMFs. The Treasury
Department and the IRS have
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
44512
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
determined that this guidance does not
appear essential to an orderly separation
of different types of shareholders into
different MMFs.
The commenter also requested that
the Treasury Department and the IRS
issue guidance setting forth the proper
tax treatment by an MMF of liquidity
fees that the MMF imposes. In addition,
the commenter requested guidance
providing that, if an MMF imposes
liquidity fees and subsequently
distributes to shareholders amounts that
correspond to amounts that the MMF
retained as liquidity fees, the MMF will
be deemed to have sufficient earnings
and profits to treat the distribution as a
dividend. These requests do not relate
directly to the NAV method or to the
information reporting provision in the
proposed regulations and so are not
addressed in these final regulations. The
Treasury Department and the IRS may
consider guidance on these questions in
the future.
7. Accounting Method Changes
As under the proposed regulations, a
taxpayer may adopt the NAV method for
shares in a floating-NAV MMF by use of
the method in the Federal income tax
return for the first taxable year in which
both (1) the taxpayer holds shares in
that MMF and (2) that MMF is a
floating-NAV MMF.
The final regulations provide that a
taxpayer seeking to change to or from
the NAV method must secure the
consent of the Commissioner in
accordance with § 1.446–1(e).
Simultaneously with the publication of
these regulations, the Treasury
Department and the IRS are issuing Rev.
Proc. 2016–39 (2016–30 IRB), which
provides the procedures by which a
taxpayer may obtain automatic consent
to change to or from the NAV method
for shares in an MMF.
In certain circumstances, Rev. Proc.
2016–39 permits taxpayers to change to
the NAV method on a federal tax return
without filing a Form 3115,
‘‘Application for Change in Accounting
Method.’’ This simplified procedure
applies to a taxpayer that holds shares
in a stable-NAV MMF and wants to
change to the NAV method for a taxable
year if (1) the taxpayer has not used the
NAV method for shares in the MMF for
any taxable year prior to the year of
change, and (2) prior to the beginning of
the year of change, either (a) the
taxpayer’s basis in each share of the
MMF has been at all times equal to the
MMF’s target share price, or (b) the
taxpayer has not realized any gain or
loss with respect to shares in the MMF.
For certain other changes, Rev. Proc.
2016–39 provides automatic consent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:29 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
procedures that require a short Form
3115. For example, these automatic
consent procedures apply to a taxpayer
that (1) has adopted a realization
method for shares in a floating-NAV
MMF and wants to change to the NAV
method for shares in that MMF, or (2)
has adopted the NAV method for shares
in a floating-NAV MMF and wants to
change to a permissible realization
method for shares in that MMF.
the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial
Institutions and Products). However,
other personnel from the Treasury
Department and the IRS participated in
their development.
Effective/Applicability Dates
The final regulations concerning the
NAV method apply to taxable years
ending on or after July 8, 2016. For
taxable years ending on or after July 28,
2014, and beginning before July 8, 2016,
however, shareholders of MMFs may
rely either on the rules concerning the
NAV method in the proposed
regulations or on the final regulations.
The final regulations concerning
information reporting apply to sales of
shares in calendar years beginning on or
after July 8, 2016. Taxpayers and
brokers (as defined in § 1.6045–1(a)(1)),
however, may rely on the rules in the
regulations concerning information
reporting for sales of shares in calendar
years beginning before July 8, 2016.
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
Statement of Availability for IRS
Documents
IRS Revenue Procedures cited in this
preamble are published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin and are available from
the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.
Government Printing Office,
Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting
the IRS Web site at https://www.irs.gov.
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including this
one, are exempt from the requirements
of Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented and reaffirmed by
Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory impact assessment is not
required. It has also been determined
that section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does
not apply to these regulations, and
because the regulations do not impose a
collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code,
the proposed regulations preceding
these final regulations were submitted
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration for
comment on their impact on small
businesses. No comments were
received.
Drafting Information
The principal author of the final
regulations is Grace Cho, IRS Office of
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by adding an entry
in numerical order to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.446–7 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 446.
Par. 2. Section 1.446–7 is added to
read as follows:
■
§ 1.446–7 Net asset value method for
certain money market fund shares.
(a) In general. This section provides a
permissible method of accounting (the
net asset value method, or NAV method)
for gain or loss on shares in a money
market fund (or MMF).
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section—
(1) Computation period. Computation
periods are the periods (of either equal
or varying length) that a taxpayer selects
for computing gain and loss under the
NAV method for shares in an MMF.
Computation periods must possess all of
the following attributes:
(i) Every day during the taxable year
falls within one, and only one,
computation period;
(ii) Each computation period contains
days from only one taxable year; and
(iii) If the taxpayer is a regulated
investment company (RIC) that is not
described in section 4982(f)—
(A) The same computation periods are
used for purposes of both income tax
accounting under chapter 1 and excise
tax computations under section 4982;
and
(B) The requirements in paragraphs
(b)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section are also
satisfied if applied by substituting the
RIC’s section 4982 period for the RIC’s
taxable year.
(2) Ending value. The ending value of
a taxpayer’s shares in an MMF for a
computation period is the aggregate fair
market value of the taxpayer’s shares at
the end of that computation period.
(3) Fair market value. The fair market
value of a share in an MMF is
determined as follows:
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Presumption based on applicable
published redemption amount. For
purposes of this section, the fair market
value of a share in an MMF is presumed
to be the applicable published
redemption amount for the share.
(ii) Published redemption amount.
The published redemption amount for a
share in an MMF is the published
amount for which the MMF would
redeem the share (usually, the net asset
value per share (NAV)), taking into
account any corrections and not taking
into account any liquidity fee described
in Rule 2a–7(c)(2) under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.2a–
7(c)(2)).
(iii) Applicable published redemption
amount. The applicable published
redemption amount is—
(A) For purposes of determining the
ending value of a taxpayer’s shares in an
MMF for a computation period under
paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the last
published redemption amount on the
last day of that computation period;
(B) For purposes of determining the
value of MMF shares received in a
redemption or exchange described in
paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(A) of this section,
the published redemption amount for
such MMF shares used to determine the
consideration received in the
redemption or exchange, or if the
consideration received is not based on
a published redemption amount, the
first published redemption amount for
such MMF shares after the redemption
or exchange;
(C) For purposes of determining the
amount received in a redemption or
exchange described in paragraph
(b)(5)(ii)(B) of this section in which the
consideration received is based on a
published redemption amount for the
redeemed shares, that published
redemption amount; and
(D) For purposes of determining the
amount received in an exchange
described in paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(B) of
this section that is not described in
paragraph (b)(3)(iii)(C) of this section, or
the amount of any adjustment resulting
from a disposition transaction described
in paragraph (b)(5)(iii) of this section,
the first published redemption amount
for the exchanged or disposed of MMF
shares after the exchange or other
transaction.
(iv) Facts and circumstances
determination. If there is no applicable
published redemption amount or if
circumstances indicate that the amount
does not represent the fair market value
of a share in the MMF, the fair market
value is determined on the basis of all
of the facts and circumstances.
(4) Money market fund (or MMF). An
MMF is a regulated investment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:29 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
company that is permitted to hold itself
out to investors as a money market fund
under Rule 2a–7 under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.2a–
7). See paragraph (c)(5) of this section
for the treatment of shares in a single
MMF held in more than one account.
(5) Net investment—(i) In general. The
net investment in an MMF for a
computation period may be a positive
amount, a negative amount, or zero.
Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(5)(iii) of this section, the net
investment is equal to—
(A) The aggregate cost of shares in the
MMF purchased during the
computation period (including
purchases through reinvestment of
dividends); minus
(B) The aggregate amount received
during the computation period in
redemption of (or otherwise in exchange
for) shares in the MMF in transactions
in which gain or loss would be
recognized if the taxpayer did not apply
the NAV method to the shares.
(ii) Aggregate amount received. For
purposes of paragraph (b)(5)(i)(B) of this
section, the amount received in a
redemption or exchange of an MMF
share is—
(A) If no property other than cash and
shares in one or more other MMFs is
received, the amount of any cash plus
the fair market value of any MMF shares
received; or
(B) If any property other than cash or
shares in one or more other MMFs is
received, the fair market value of the
redeemed MMF share.
(iii) Adjustments—(A) Dispositions in
which gain or loss is not recognized. If,
during the computation period, any
shares in an MMF are disposed of in
transactions in which gain or loss would
not be recognized if the taxpayer did not
apply the NAV method to the shares,
the net investment in the MMF for the
computation period is decreased by the
fair market value of each such share at
the time of its disposition.
(B) Acquisitions other than by
purchase. If, during the computation
period, any shares in an MMF are
acquired other than by purchase, the net
investment in the MMF for the
computation period is increased by the
adjusted basis (for purposes of
determining loss) of each such share
immediately after its acquisition. If the
adjusted basis of an acquired share
would be determined by reference to the
basis of a share or shares in an MMF
that are being disposed of by the
taxpayer in a transaction that is
governed by paragraph (b)(5)(iii)(A) of
this section, then the adjusted basis of
each such disposed share is treated for
purposes of this section as being the fair
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
44513
market value of that share at the time of
its disposition. If the adjusted basis of
an acquired share would be determined
by reference to the basis of that share in
the hands of the person from whom the
share is acquired and that person was
applying the NAV method to the share
at the time of the transaction, then the
adjusted basis of the share in the hands
of the person from whom the share is
acquired is treated for purposes of this
section as being the fair market value of
that share at the time of the transaction.
(6) Section 4982 period. If a taxpayer
using the NAV method is a RIC to which
section 4982 applies, the section 4982
period is the one-year period with
respect to which gain or loss is
determined for purposes of section
4982(e)(2) and (e)(6). The preceding
sentence is applied taking into account
the application of section 4982(e)(4).
See paragraph (c)(8) of this section
regarding the application of section
4982(e)(6).
(7) Starting basis. The starting basis of
a taxpayer’s shares in an MMF for a
computation period is—
(i) Except as provided in paragraph
(b)(7)(ii) of this section, the ending
value of the taxpayer’s shares in the
MMF for the immediately preceding
computation period; or
(ii) For the first computation period in
a taxable year, if the taxpayer did not
use the NAV method for shares in the
MMF for the immediately preceding
taxable year, the aggregate adjusted
basis of the taxpayer’s shares in the
MMF at the end of the immediately
preceding taxable year.
(c) NAV method—(1) Scope. A
taxpayer may use the NAV method
described in this section to determine
the gain or loss for a taxable year on the
taxpayer’s shares in an MMF. A
taxpayer may have different methods of
accounting, different computation
periods, and gains or losses of differing
character, for its shares in different
MMFs. See paragraph (c)(5) of this
section for the treatment of shares in a
single MMF held in more than one
account. See paragraph (c)(6) of this
section for rules applicable to RICs to
which section 4982 applies. See
paragraph (c)(8) of this section for rules
applicable to accounting method
changes.
(2) Net gain or loss for a taxable
year—(i) Determination for each
computation period. Subject to any
adjustment under paragraph (c)(2)(ii) of
this section, the net gain or loss for each
computation period with respect to the
shares in an MMF to which the NAV
method applies equals the ending value,
minus the starting basis, minus the net
investment in the MMF for the
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
44514
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
computation period. If the computation
produces a result that is greater than
zero, the taxpayer has a gain for the
computation period with respect to the
shares in the MMF; if the computation
produces a result that is less than zero,
the taxpayer has a loss for the
computation period with respect to the
shares in the MMF; and if the
computation produces a result that is
equal to zero, the taxpayer has no gain
or loss for the computation period with
respect to the shares in the MMF.
(ii) Adjustment of gain or loss to
reflect any basis adjustments. If, during
a computation period, there is any
downward (or upward) adjustment to
the taxpayer’s basis in the shares in the
MMF under any provision of internal
revenue law, then the net gain or loss
for the computation period on shares in
the MMF determined under paragraph
(c)(2)(i) of this section is increased (or
decreased) by the amount of the
adjustment.
(iii) Timing of gains and losses. Gain
or loss determined under the NAV
method with respect to a taxpayer’s
shares in an MMF during a computation
period is treated as arising on the last
day of the computation period.
(iv) Determination of net gain or loss
for each taxable year. The taxpayer’s net
gain or loss for a taxable year on shares
in an MMF is the sum of the net gains
or losses on shares in the MMF for the
computation period (or computation
periods) that comprise the taxable year.
(3) Character—(i) In the case of a
taxpayer that applies the NAV method
to shares in an MMF, the gain or loss
with respect to those shares for a
computation period is treated as gain or
loss from a sale or exchange of a capital
asset provided the sale or exchange of
one or more of those shares during the
computation period would give rise to
capital gain or loss if the taxpayer did
not apply the NAV method to the
shares.
(ii) In the case of a taxpayer that
applies the NAV method to shares in an
MMF, the gain or loss with respect to
those shares for a computation period is
treated as ordinary gain or loss provided
the sale or exchange of every one of
those shares during the computation
period would give rise to ordinary gain
or loss if the taxpayer did not apply the
NAV method to the shares.
(iii) See paragraph (c)(5) of this
section for the treatment of shares in a
single MMF held in more than one
account.
(4) Holding period. Capital gains and
losses determined under the NAV
method are treated as short-term capital
gains and losses.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:29 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
(5) More than one account. If a
taxpayer holds shares in an MMF
through more than one account, the
taxpayer must treat its holdings in each
account as a separate MMF for purposes
of this section. A taxpayer therefore may
have different methods of accounting,
different computation periods, and
gains or losses of differing character, for
its shares of a single MMF held in
different accounts.
(6) Consistency requirement for MMF
shareholders that are RICs. If the
taxpayer is a RIC that is not described
in section 4982(f) (and therefore is
subject to the section 4982 excise tax),
then, for each MMF, the taxpayer must
use the NAV method for both income
tax and excise tax computations or for
neither computation. See paragraph
(c)(5) of this section for the treatment of
shares in a single MMF held in more
than one account. See paragraph
(c)(8)(ii) of this section for changes to or
from the NAV method by a RIC.
(7) Treatment of ordinary gains and
losses under section 4982(e)(6). Under
section 4982(e)(6)(B), this section is a
specified mark to market provision, and
therefore any ordinary gains and losses
determined under the NAV method are
governed by section 4982(e)(6)(A).
(8) Accounting method changes—(i)
In general. A change to or from the NAV
method is a change in method of
accounting to which the provisions of
section 446 and the accompanying
regulations apply. A taxpayer seeking to
change to or from the NAV method must
secure the consent of the Commissioner
in accordance with § 1.446–1(e) and
follow the administrative procedures
issued under § 1.446–1(e)(3)(ii) for
obtaining the Commissioner’s consent to
change the taxpayer’s accounting
method. Any such change will be made
on a cut-off basis. Because there will be
no duplication or omission of amounts
as a result of such a change to or from
the NAV method, no adjustment under
section 481(a) will be required or
permitted.
(ii) RICs—(A) In general. A RIC that is
subject to the excise tax under section
4982 and that changes to or from the
NAV method for its shares in an MMF
for income tax purposes must apply the
new method for excise tax purposes
starting with the first day of the RIC’s
income tax year of change. If that first
day is not the first day of the RIC’s
section 4982 period that ends in or with
the RIC’s income tax year, then solely
for purposes of applying the NAV
method to compute the RIC’s required
distribution for the calendar year that
ends with or within the RIC’s income
tax year of change, the section 4982
period is bifurcated into two portions,
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
each of which is treated as a separate
taxable year. The first portion begins on
the first day of the section 4982 period
and ends on the last day of the RIC’s
income tax year that precedes the year
of change. The second portion begins on
the first day of the income tax year of
change and ends on the last day of the
section 4982 period.
(B) Example. If a RIC that holds MMF
shares as capital assets changes from a
realization method to the NAV method
for its income tax year ending January
31, 2019, the section 4982 period is
bifurcated into two portions that are
treated as separate taxable years solely
for purposes of applying this section.
For the portion starting on November 1,
2017, and ending on January 31, 2018,
the RIC applies its realization method
for excise tax purposes. For the portion
starting on February 1, 2018, and ending
on October 31, 2018, the RIC applies the
NAV method for excise tax purposes,
treating February 1, 2018, as the first
day of the RIC’s tax year for purposes of
paragraphs (b)(1) and (6) of this section.
The RIC’s net gain or loss for this later
portion is determined under paragraph
(c)(2)(iii) of this section. This net gain or
loss and any gains and losses for the
earlier portion determined under the
realization method are taken into
account in determining the RIC’s capital
gain net income for the full one-year
period described in section
4982(b)(1)(B).
(d) Example. The provisions of this
section may be illustrated by the
following example:
Example. (i) Fund is an MMF. Shareholder
is a person whose taxable year is the calendar
year. On January 1 of Year 1, Shareholder
owns 5,000,000 shares in Fund with an
adjusted basis of $5,000,000.00. The price of
Fund shares has not varied from $1.00 from
the date Shareholder acquired the shares
through January 1 of Year 1. During that
period, Shareholder has engaged in multiple
purchases and redemptions of Fund shares,
but Shareholder has reported no gains or
losses with respect to the shares because
Shareholder realized an amount in each
redemption equal to Shareholder’s basis in
the redeemed shares. During Year 1, the price
of Fund shares begins to float. During Year
1, Shareholder receives $32,158.23 in taxable
dividends from Fund and makes 120
purchases of additional shares in Fund
(including purchases through the
reinvestment of those dividends) totaling
$1,253,256.37 and 28 redemptions totaling
$1,124,591.71. The fair market value of
Shareholder’s shares in Fund at the end of
Year 1 is $5,129,750.00. All of Shareholder’s
shares in Fund are held in a single account
and as capital assets. There is no adjustment
to the basis in Shareholder’s shares in Fund
under any provision of internal revenue law
during Year 1.
(ii) Prior to Year 1, Shareholder has had no
gains or losses to report with respect to the
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Fund shares under a realization method and
no changes in fair market value that would
have been reported under the NAV method.
Therefore, Shareholder may use the NAV
method for the shares in Fund for Year 1.
Shareholder uses the NAV method for the
shares with its taxable year as the
computation period. Shareholder’s net
investment in Fund for Year 1 equals
$128,664.66 (the $1,253,256.37 in purchases,
minus the $1,124,591.71 in redemptions).
Shareholder’s Year 1 gain therefore is
$1,085.34, which is the ending value of
Shareholder’s shares ($5,129,750.00), minus
the starting basis of Shareholder’s shares
($5,000,000.00), minus Shareholder’s net
investment in the fund for the taxable year
($128,664.66). The gain of $1,085.34 is
treated as short-term capital gain.
Shareholder’s starting basis for Year 2 is
$5,129,750.00. Shareholder also must include
the $32,158.23 in dividends in its income for
Year 1 in the same manner as if Shareholder
did not use the NAV method.
(iii) If Shareholder had instead adopted the
calendar month as its computation period, it
would have used the NAV method for every
month of Year 1, even though prices of Fund
shares may have been fixed for some months.
(e) Effective/applicability date. Except
as provided in the following sentence,
this section applies to taxable years
ending on or after July 8, 2016. For
taxable years ending on or after July 28,
2014, and beginning before July 8, 2016,
however, shareholders of MMFs may
rely either on this section or on § 1.446–
7 of the 2014 proposed regulations
REG–107012–14 (79 FR 43694).
Par. 3. Section 1.6045–1 is amended
by revising paragraph (c)(3)(vi) to read
as follows:
■
§ 1.6045–1 Returns of information of
brokers and barter exchanges.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) Money market funds—(A) In
general. No return of information is
required with respect to a sale of shares
in a regulated investment company that
is permitted to hold itself out to
investors as a money market fund under
Rule 2a–7 under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.2a–
7).
(B) Effective/applicability date.
Paragraph (c)(3)(vi)(A) of this section
applies to sales of shares in calendar
years beginning on or after July 8, 2016.
Taxpayers and brokers (as defined in
§ 1.6045–1(a)(1)), however, may rely on
paragraph (c)(3)(vi)(A) of this section for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:29 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
sales of shares in calendar years
beginning before July 8, 2016.
*
*
*
*
*
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: June 15, 2016.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–16149 Filed 7–7–16; 8:45 am]
44515
annual Victim Assistance Program
formula grants are used by the States to
provide financial support to eligible
crime victim assistance programs. See
42 U.S.C. 10603. OVC promulgates this
rule pursuant to the rulemaking
authority granted to the OVC Director by
42 U.S.C. 10604(a). This rule codifies
and updates the existing Program
Guidelines to reflect changes in OVC
policy, the needs of the crime victim
services field, and VOCA itself.
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
B. Summary of the Major Provisions of
the Final Rule
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Most provisions in this final rule are
substantively the same as the
corresponding provisions of the
Guidelines. The final rule reorganizes
the program rules into six major
divisions: (1) General Provisions; (2)
State Administering Agency (‘‘SAA’’)
Program Requirements; (3) SAA Use of
Funds for Administration and Training;
(4) Sub-Recipient Program
Requirements; (5) Sub-Recipient Project
Requirements; and (6) Sub-Recipient
Allowable/Unallowable Costs.
The rules in the General Provisions
heading do not depart substantively
from the Guidelines. OVC defines
frequently-used terms, most of which
are consistent with those in the
Guidelines. OVC adds a new definition
of the statutory term ‘‘victim of child
abuse’’ to make clear OVC’s existing
flexible approach of allowing States to
address a broad variety of harm to
children. Additional technical changes
were made in response to comments,
and are described below.
The SAA Program Requirements
heading sets forth general
considerations for SAA use of VOCA
funding under the VOCA Assistance
Program at the State level, and sets forth
the rules SAAs must follow in meeting
the statutory eligibility and certification
requirements. OVC clarifies that passthrough funding is permissible, and sets
parameters for such funding
arrangements. OVC explains how States
must allocate VOCA funding among
various types of victim service
programs, but does not change the
allocation percentages set out in the
Guidelines. OVC adds a requirement
that States maintain a documented
methodology for selecting all subrecipients. Finally, OVC maintains the
default monitoring requirements of the
Guidelines, but now permits States to
seek a waiver from the OVC Director to
use alternatives.
28 CFR Part 94
[Docket No.: OJP (OVC) 1523]
RIN 1121–AA69
Victims of Crime Act Victim Assistance
Program
Office for Victims of Crime,
Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Office for Victims of
Crime (‘‘OVC’’) of the U.S. Department
of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs
(‘‘OJP’’), publishes this final rule to
implement the victim assistance
formula grant program (‘‘Victim
Assistance Program’’) authorized by the
Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (‘‘VOCA’’).
VOCA authorizes OVC to provide an
annual grant from the Crime Victims
Fund to each State and eligible territory
for the financial support of services to
crime victims by eligible crime victim
assistance programs. The rule codifies
and updates the existing VOCA Victim
Assistance Program Guidelines
(‘‘Guidelines’’) to reflect changes in
OVC policy, needs of the crime victim
services field, and VOCA itself.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is
effective August 8, 2016.
Compliance Date: See 28 CFR
94.101(d), as added by this final rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Toni
Thomas, Office for Victims of Crime, at
(202) 307–5983.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Regulatory Action
The Victims of Crime Act of 1984
(VOCA) authorizes the Office for
Victims of Crime (OVC) to provide an
annual formula grant from the Crime
Victims Fund to each State and eligible
territory for the purpose of providing
assistance to victims of crime.1 These
1 Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 10603(d)(1), and as used
in this preamble and rule unless context indicates
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
otherwise, ‘‘the term ‘State’ includes the District of
Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the
United States Virgin Islands, and any other territory
or possession of the United States.’’
E:\FR\FM\08JYR1.SGM
08JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 131 (Friday, July 8, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 44508-44515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16149]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9774]
RIN 1545-BM04
Method of Accounting for Gains and Losses on Shares in Money
Market Funds; Broker Returns With Respect to Sales of Shares in Money
Market Funds
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations that provide a
simplified method of accounting for gains and losses on shares in money
market funds (MMFs). The final regulations also provide guidance
regarding information reporting requirements for shares in MMFs. The
final regulations respond to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
rules that change the amount for which certain MMF shares are
distributed, redeemed, and repurchased. The final regulations affect
MMFs and their shareholders.
DATES: Effective date: These regulations are effective on July 8, 2016.
Applicability dates: For the dates of applicability, see Sec. Sec.
1.446-7(e) and 1.6045-1(c)(3)(vi)(B).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grace Cho at (202) 317-6895 (not a
toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains amendments to 26 CFR part 1 (Income Tax
Regulations) under sections 446 and 6045 of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). The regulations provide a method of accounting for gain or loss
on shares in MMFs and are intended to simplify tax compliance for
holders of shares in MMFs affected by SEC regulations that impose
liquidity fees or change how certain MMF shares are priced. See Money
Market Fund Reform; Amendments to Form PF, Securities Act Release No.
33-9616, Investment Advisers Act Release No. IA-3879, Investment
Company Act Release No. IC-31166, Financial Reporting Codification No.
FR-84 (August 14, 2014) (SEC MMF Reform Rules). The regulations also
provide guidance regarding information reporting requirements for
shares in MMFs.
An MMF is a type of investment company registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act) and regulated as an MMF under
Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.2a-7). MMFs have historically
sought to keep stable the prices at which their shares are distributed,
redeemed, and repurchased. The securities that Rule 2a-7 permits an MMF
to hold generally result in no more than minimal fluctuations in the
MMF's net asset value per share (NAV).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Note that the term ``NAV'' is used throughout this document
to indicate the per-share amount that may be described elsewhere as
``NAV per share.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
MMFs meeting the requirements of Rule 2a-7 have been permitted to
value their assets based on the assets' cost, with certain adjustments
(amortized cost method), and to price their shares by rounding the
resulting NAV to the nearest 1 percent (penny rounding). These methods
have enabled MMFs to maintain constant share prices in almost all
circumstances. Because most MMFs target a $1.00 share price, an MMF
that fails to maintain a constant share price is said to ``break the
buck.''
The SEC MMF Reform Rules generally bar the use of the amortized
cost method and penny rounding for certain MMFs (floating-NAV MMFs) and
require a floating-NAV MMF to value its assets using market factors and
to round its price per share to the nearest basis point (the fourth
decimal place, in the case of a fund with a $1.0000 share price).
Certain government-security-focused MMFs (government MMFs) and certain
MMFs the beneficial owners of which are limited to natural persons
(retail MMFs) may continue to use the amortized cost method and penny
rounding. (A government MMF or retail MMF that continues to use the
amortized cost method and penny rounding is called a stable-NAV MMF.)
The SEC MMF Reform Rules also establish circumstances under which
an MMF is permitted or required to impose a liquidity fee or is
permitted to impose a redemption gate. When an MMF has a liquidity fee
in effect, the liquidity fee reduces the proceeds received by all
redeeming shareholders. A redemption gate is the temporary suspension
of redemptions of shares in the MMF. Liquidity fees and redemption
gates
[[Page 44509]]
may be imposed by both floating-NAV MMFs and stable-NAV MMFs. An MMF
other than a government MMF is required to impose a liquidity fee in
certain circumstances, unless the fund's board of directors determines
that such a fee is not in the best interests of the fund.
The Treasury Department and the IRS published a notice of proposed
rulemaking and notice of public hearing (REG-107012-14) in the Federal
Register on July 28, 2014 (79 FR 43694). The proposed regulations
described a simplified method of accounting for gain or loss on shares
in a floating-NAV MMF (the net asset value method, or NAV method).
Under the NAV method, a taxpayer's gain or loss on shares in an MMF is
based on the change in the aggregate value of the taxpayer's shares
during a computation period selected by the taxpayer and on the net
amount of the purchases and redemptions during the computation period.
The proposed regulations also provided guidance regarding information
reporting requirements for shares in MMFs.
A request for a public hearing was received, and the hearing was
held on November 19, 2014. The IRS received written comments responding
to the proposed regulations regarding the method of accounting for
gains and losses on shares in MMFs. The written comments are available
for public inspection at https://www.regulations.gov or upon request.
After considering the comments, the Treasury Department and the IRS
adopt the proposed regulations regarding the method of accounting as
final regulations with the modifications described in this Treasury
decision. No comments were received on the portion of the proposed
regulations that would revise Sec. 1.6045-1(c)(3)(vi) to clarify that
the exceptions under sections 6045, 6045A, and 6045B continue to apply
to all MMFs, including floating-NAV MMFs. The Treasury Department and
the IRS adopt the proposed regulations revising Sec. 1.6045-
1(c)(3)(vi) as final regulations without substantive change.
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
1. Application of the NAV Method to Stable-NAV MMFs
Under the proposed regulations, the NAV method would apply only to
floating-NAV MMF shares. In the preamble to the proposed regulations,
the Treasury Department and the IRS requested comments regarding
whether the NAV method should be a permissible method of accounting for
stable-NAV MMF shares.
Although stable-NAV MMFs seek to maintain constant share prices,
there are circumstances in which shares in a stable-NAV MMF will give
rise to gain or loss. On rare occasions, shares in a stable-NAV MMF may
be redeemed at a price other than the target price, such as when the
MMF breaks the buck. In addition, a stable-NAV MMF may impose liquidity
fees, which will generally result in the realization of a loss by a
redeeming shareholder. If the acquisition of other shares causes such a
redemption to be a wash sale under section 1091, section 1091(d) will
generally cause the basis of the acquired shares to exceed the cost of
the shares. Because the price of a stable-NAV MMF share rarely changes,
any disposition of those acquired, higher-basis shares will likely
result in another loss, which also may be deferred by the wash sale
rules. Therefore, even if a liquidity fee is in effect for only one
redemption by a shareholder and the share price of the MMF remains
constant, that fee may cause a difference between the basis and value
of the shareholder's MMF shares that persists indefinitely. Determining
gain or loss and basis on each transaction in a stable-NAV MMF, taking
into account the wash sale rules, would impose significant burdens on
shareholders under these circumstances. To eliminate those burdens, a
shareholder might need to terminate the shareholder's entire interest
in the affected MMF (and not initiate a new position until after the
end of the period described in section 1091(a)).
Commenters recommended that the NAV method be applicable not only
to shares in floating-NAV MMFs but also to shares in stable-NAV MMFs.
The commenters added that many shareholders of stable-NAV MMFs may be
retail shareholders (generally, individuals) who are likely to rely
upon the cost basis reporting provided by funds or brokers for their
other mutual funds. Those individuals are unlikely to have the systems
necessary to record gains and losses and to track wash sales and the
resulting basis adjustments.
The NAV method would reduce the complexity, and any tax-based
motivation to terminate investments in MMFs, that would result from the
imposition of a liquidity fee by a stable-NAV MMF. Under the NAV
method, any loss that resulted from the imposition of a liquidity fee
by an MMF would be determined for a shareholder's entire interest in
the MMF (or in an account) for the appropriate taxable year (or
computation period) rather than for a single transaction. Therefore,
the wash sale rules would not defer the loss. The NAV method also
requires fewer and simpler computations than traditional accounting,
even if there are no wash sales. For the years after an MMF breaks the
buck or imposes a liquidity fee, the NAV method simplifies
recordkeeping, because the gain or loss for each year is based on
changes in the NAV during that year. Therefore, the final regulations
permit taxpayers to apply the NAV method to shares in stable-NAV MMFs.
2. Consistency Requirement
The proposed regulations would provide that if a taxpayer applies
the NAV method to shares in any MMF for a taxable year, the taxpayer
must apply the NAV method to its shares in all MMFs for which that
method is permissible.
Commenters requested that the final regulations permit taxpayers to
apply different methods to shares in different MMFs or to shares in a
single MMF held in different accounts. Commenters said that some
taxpayers may receive sufficient information about their shares in
certain MMFs to compute gain or loss realized on each transaction and
that those taxpayers should be permitted to compute gain or loss
realized on each transaction for those MMFs.
Commenters also noted that taxpayers may hold shares in a single
MMF through different kinds of accounts (for example, an account with a
broker and an account with the MMF itself) and may receive different
information for the different accounts. The commenters recommended
that, because of that possibility, taxpayers should be permitted to use
different accounting methods for shares held in different accounts.
Commenters also noted that many MMF shareholders will be large
institutional investors, which might hold shares in the same MMF
through separate accounts controlled by different divisions.
In response to these comments, the final regulations permit MMF
shareholders to use different methods of accounting for shares in
different MMFs or for shares in a single MMF held in different
accounts.
3. Choosing NAV Method Computation Periods for RIC Excise Tax Purposes
Under the NAV method, computation periods are the periods that a
taxpayer selects for computing gain and loss for an MMF. The proposed
regulations would provide that computation periods may be the
taxpayer's taxable year or a shorter period, provided that (i)
computation periods are of approximately equal duration, (ii) every day
during the taxable year falls within one, and only one, computation
period,
[[Page 44510]]
and (iii) each computation period contains days from only one taxable
year.
Most regulated investment companies (RICs) must pay an excise tax
under section 4982 if they do not make the required distribution
described in section 4982(b) for a calendar year. The required
distribution is generally 98 percent of the RIC's ordinary income for
the calendar year, plus 98.2 percent of the RIC's capital gain net
income for the one-year period ending on October 31 of the calendar
year. A commenter requested clarification that a RIC that holds MMF
shares may use the NAV method for excise tax computations. That
commenter also requested that the Treasury Department and the IRS
confirm that a RIC that uses the NAV method is permitted to use the
one-year period from November 1 to October 31 as its computation period
for excise tax purposes. The commenter explained that RICs generally
account for items that are marked to market using two different one-
year periods for income tax and excise tax purposes. The commenter
explained that, under section 4982(e)(2)(A), the term ``capital gain
net income'' when used in section 4982 is determined by treating the
one-year period ending on October 31 of any calendar year as the
company's taxable year.
The Treasury Department and the IRS agree that the NAV method
should be applicable for purposes of the computations required by
section 4982 and that the taxable year for purposes of those
computations should be the relevant period under section 4982(e). The
final regulations adopt this change.
The final regulations, however, require a RIC to be consistent in
applying the NAV method to MMF shares for income tax and excise tax
purposes. For each MMF in each account, the final regulations generally
require a RIC to use the NAV method either for both income tax and
excise tax computations or for neither computation. The final
regulations also clarify how a RIC may change to or from the NAV
method.
The final regulations require a RIC to use the same computation
periods for purposes of both excise tax and income tax computations.
Therefore, under the final regulations, a RIC using the NAV method for
its shares in an MMF generally treats the one-year period for which
gain or loss from the MMF would be included in the amount determined
under section 4982(e)(2) or (e)(6) (the section 4982 period) like a
taxable year in applying the NAV method to determine the RIC's required
distribution under section 4982(b).\2\ The RIC, however, may not use
the section 4982 period as a computation period for excise tax purposes
if the section 4982 period contains days from more than one income tax
year.\3\ Instead, in this situation, the RIC must divide the section
4982 period into at least two computation periods so that each
computation period contains days from only one income tax year.
Similarly, the RIC may not use its full income tax year as a
computation period for income tax purposes if the year contains days
from more than one section 4982 period. These consistency requirements
simplify and clarify the interaction of sections 852(b) and 4982.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ If a RIC has not made an election under section 4982(e)(4),
the RIC's section 4982 period is the one-year period ending on
October 31, because that is the period for determining capital gain
net income under section 4982(e)(2) and (because the final
regulations concerning the NAV method constitute a specified mark to
market provision for purposes of section 4982(e)(6)(B)) ordinary
income under 4982(e)(6)(A).
\3\ The section 4982 period will contain days from only one
income tax year if (i) the RIC has in effect a valid election under
section 4982(e)(4) or (ii) the RIC's income tax year ends on October
31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The final regulations eliminate the requirement that computation
periods be of approximately equal duration. The Treasury Department and
the IRS do not believe that this requirement is essential to the
operation of the NAV method, and eliminating the requirement will allow
taxpayers more flexibility. In particular, permitting computation
periods of unequal duration will reduce the burden on RICs of complying
with the requirement of consistent computation periods for income and
excise tax purposes. For example, a RIC that applies the NAV method to
its shares in an MMF (held as a capital asset) and that has an income
tax year ending on January 31 may meet the consistency requirements
with two computation periods of unequal duration--one ending on January
31 and the other on October 31. The RIC also may use additional
computation periods ending on other dates, such as December 31.
4. Clarification of Certain Amounts
A. Fair Market Value of MMF Shares
Under the proposed regulations, gain and loss under the NAV method
would be determined by reference to the fair market value of MMF
shares. Commenters requested that the Treasury Department and the IRS
clarify that the fair market value of an MMF share for this purpose is
the NAV reported by the MMF. One commenter suggested that the fair
market value of a share in an MMF should be the published NAV as of the
end of the relevant day (or the next trading day, if the day in
question is not a trading day). A second commenter suggested that,
because MMFs may strike several NAVs throughout the day, the fair
market value should be the next published NAV after a transaction.
In response to these comments, the final regulations clarify that
the fair market value of a share in an MMF at the time of a transaction
is presumed to be the published NAV (or other published amount for
which the MMF would redeem the share, determined without regard to any
liquidity fees (other redemption amount)). For purposes of computing
the ending value for a computation period, the presumption applies to
the last published NAV (or other redemption amount) in that computation
period. For purposes of determining the fair market value of MMF shares
surrendered or received in a redemption or exchange, the presumption
generally applies to the NAV (or other redemption amount) used to
determine the consideration received in the transaction, or if the
consideration is not based on a published NAV (or other redemption
amount), the first NAV (or other redemption amount) published for the
MMF shares after the transaction. If no NAV (or other redemption
amount) is published, or if facts and circumstances indicate that the
NAV (or other redemption amount) does not represent the fair market
value of a share in the MMF, the fair market value is determined on the
basis of all the facts and circumstances.
B. Aggregate Amount Received
Under the proposed regulations, a taxpayer's net investment in an
MMF for a computation period would equal the aggregate cost of shares
in the MMF purchased during the computation period, minus the aggregate
amount received during the computation period in redemption of shares
in the MMF, subject to certain adjustments. A commenter suggested that
the final regulations clarify that the aggregate amount received is
based on: (i) If cash is received, the cash proceeds, (ii) if shares in
another MMF are received, the published NAV of the shares received as
of the end of the day on which the redemption or exchange occurs (or
the next trading day, if the day in question is not a trading day), or
(iii) if other non-cash property is received, the NAV of the redeemed
or exchanged shares as of the end of the day on which the redemption or
exchange occurs (or the next trading day if the day in question is not
a trading day or, if the fund will
[[Page 44511]]
not publish a NAV on or after the end of the day on which the
redemption or exchange occurs, the fund's last published NAV).
The final regulations include provisions for determining the amount
received for purposes of computing a taxpayer's net investment in an
MMF for a computation period. If the consideration received in exchange
for an MMF share consists only of cash, other MMF shares, or both, the
amount received is the amount of any cash plus the fair market value of
any MMF shares received. If the consideration includes any property
other than cash or MMF shares, the amount received is determined by
reference to the fair market value of the surrendered MMF shares.
The same commenter recommended that a phrase in Sec. 1.446-
7(b)(5)(i)(B) of the proposed regulations, ``if the transaction is one
in which gain or loss would be recognized,'' be clarified to indicate
that it refers to recognition of gain or loss other than pursuant to
the NAV method. The final regulations make this clarification.
C. Substituted Basis
Under the proposed regulations, a taxpayer's net investment would
increase if, during the computation period, the taxpayer acquired any
shares in an MMF other than by purchase. In such cases, the net
investment increases by the adjusted basis (for purposes of determining
loss) of each such share immediately after its acquisition. The
proposed regulations would also provide that if that adjusted basis
would be determined by reference to the basis of one or more shares in
an MMF that are being disposed of by the taxpayer in a transaction in
which gain or loss is not recognized (exchanged basis), then the basis
of each such disposed share is treated as being the fair market value
of that share at the time of its disposition. A commenter noted that
the proposed regulations do not address a situation in which the
shareholder receives a transferred basis in MMF shares acquired from
another person. The commenter suggested that, in that situation, if the
person from whom the shareholder acquired the shares used the NAV
method, then the adjusted basis of the acquired shares should be
treated as the published NAV applicable to the acquisition date.
The final regulations clarify the effect on net investment of a
share acquired from another person with a transferred basis. Similar to
the commenter's suggestion, the final regulations provide that, if a
shareholder receives a transferred basis in one or more acquired MMF
shares and the person from whom the shareholder acquired the shares
used the NAV method, then the adjusted basis of the acquired shares
will be their fair market value at the time of the acquisition, which
value is presumed to be the next NAV (or other redemption amount)
published by the MMF.
5. MMF Accounts With Shares of Mixed Character
The proposed regulations would provide that if a taxpayer uses the
NAV method for shares in an MMF and each of those shares otherwise
would give rise to capital gain or loss if sold or exchanged in a
computation period, then the gain or loss from the shares in the MMF is
treated as capital gain or loss under the NAV method. Likewise, if each
of the shares otherwise would give rise to ordinary gain or loss if
sold or exchanged in a computation period, then the gain or loss is
treated as ordinary gain or loss. If, however, the sale of all of the
shares in the MMF would give rise to a combination of ordinary gain or
loss and capital gain or loss if sold or exchanged in a computation
period, then all gain or loss from the shares in the MMF is treated as
capital gain or loss.
A commenter noted that the proposed regulations do not explain why
all gain or loss should be treated as capital in the case of an account
containing MMF shares of mixed character. The commenter recommended
that the character of gain or loss with respect to a mixed character
account be bifurcated based on the portion of the shares that would
generate gain or loss of each character.
The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that it is rare for a
shareholder to hold shares of a single MMF the disposition of which
would produce a mix of ordinary income and capital gain. Under that
circumstance, a taxpayer may use different accounts to preserve the
character of the shares that would produce ordinary income and capital
gain. The purpose of the NAV method is to provide an alternative to
traditional accounting for taxpayers seeking simplicity. The rationale
for offering a method solely for MMFs is that the value of MMFs
fluctuates so little that simplicity is more important than tracking
each individual gain or loss. A rule that bifurcates gain or loss based
on the value of the shares in a single account, when those values may
change during a computation period, would make the NAV method more
complex. That additional complexity is not warranted in light of the
rarity of the circumstance the proposed bifurcation would address and
the ability of shareholders to prevent the treatment of all gain or
loss as capital by using separate accounts. Therefore, the final
regulations retain the simplifying rule for mixed-character accounts.
6. Other Requests and Comments
A. Wash Sale Rules Exemption for Stable-NAV MMFs
Concurrently with the release of the proposed regulations, the
Treasury Department and the IRS released Rev. Proc. 2014-45 (2014-34
IRB 388), which provides that the wash sale rules in section 1091 will
not be applied to redemptions of shares in floating-NAV MMFs.
Commenters requested that the wash sale exemption, which is limited to
floating-NAV MMFs, be extended to stable-NAV MMFs that impose liquidity
fees.
The final regulations permit shareholders of stable-NAV MMFs to use
the NAV method. A shareholder who uses the NAV method would not require
an exemption from the wash sale rules because under the NAV method, net
gain or loss is determined for each computation period, and no gain or
loss is determined for any particular redemption of a taxpayer's shares
in an MMF. Without a determination of loss for a particular redemption,
that redemption does not implicate the wash sale rules. Because
taxpayers may use the NAV method to prevent wash sales, the Treasury
Department and IRS are not extending the exemption in Rev. Proc. 2014-
45 to stable-NAV MMFs.
B. Other Requests
A commenter requested that the Treasury Department and the IRS
issue guidance regarding the tax treatment of an MMF's receipt of
financial support from an investment adviser to raise the NAV of the
MMF (determined without the amortized cost method or penny rounding) to
$1.0000. In addition, the commenter requested guidance regarding the
diversification requirements of section 817(h) for a segregated asset
account that qualifies as, or invests in, a government MMF. On May 5,
2016, the Treasury Department and the IRS released guidance related to
both of these requests. See Rev. Proc. 2016-31 (2016-21 IRB 988);
Notice 2016-32 (2016-21 IRB 878).
The commenter also requested (and later withdrew its request) that
the Treasury Department and the IRS issue guidance providing tax-free
treatment for certain divisions of MMFs into retail and institutional
MMFs. The Treasury Department and the IRS have
[[Page 44512]]
determined that this guidance does not appear essential to an orderly
separation of different types of shareholders into different MMFs.
The commenter also requested that the Treasury Department and the
IRS issue guidance setting forth the proper tax treatment by an MMF of
liquidity fees that the MMF imposes. In addition, the commenter
requested guidance providing that, if an MMF imposes liquidity fees and
subsequently distributes to shareholders amounts that correspond to
amounts that the MMF retained as liquidity fees, the MMF will be deemed
to have sufficient earnings and profits to treat the distribution as a
dividend. These requests do not relate directly to the NAV method or to
the information reporting provision in the proposed regulations and so
are not addressed in these final regulations. The Treasury Department
and the IRS may consider guidance on these questions in the future.
7. Accounting Method Changes
As under the proposed regulations, a taxpayer may adopt the NAV
method for shares in a floating-NAV MMF by use of the method in the
Federal income tax return for the first taxable year in which both (1)
the taxpayer holds shares in that MMF and (2) that MMF is a floating-
NAV MMF.
The final regulations provide that a taxpayer seeking to change to
or from the NAV method must secure the consent of the Commissioner in
accordance with Sec. 1.446-1(e). Simultaneously with the publication
of these regulations, the Treasury Department and the IRS are issuing
Rev. Proc. 2016-39 (2016-30 IRB), which provides the procedures by
which a taxpayer may obtain automatic consent to change to or from the
NAV method for shares in an MMF.
In certain circumstances, Rev. Proc. 2016-39 permits taxpayers to
change to the NAV method on a federal tax return without filing a Form
3115, ``Application for Change in Accounting Method.'' This simplified
procedure applies to a taxpayer that holds shares in a stable-NAV MMF
and wants to change to the NAV method for a taxable year if (1) the
taxpayer has not used the NAV method for shares in the MMF for any
taxable year prior to the year of change, and (2) prior to the
beginning of the year of change, either (a) the taxpayer's basis in
each share of the MMF has been at all times equal to the MMF's target
share price, or (b) the taxpayer has not realized any gain or loss with
respect to shares in the MMF.
For certain other changes, Rev. Proc. 2016-39 provides automatic
consent procedures that require a short Form 3115. For example, these
automatic consent procedures apply to a taxpayer that (1) has adopted a
realization method for shares in a floating-NAV MMF and wants to change
to the NAV method for shares in that MMF, or (2) has adopted the NAV
method for shares in a floating-NAV MMF and wants to change to a
permissible realization method for shares in that MMF.
Effective/Applicability Dates
The final regulations concerning the NAV method apply to taxable
years ending on or after July 8, 2016. For taxable years ending on or
after July 28, 2014, and beginning before July 8, 2016, however,
shareholders of MMFs may rely either on the rules concerning the NAV
method in the proposed regulations or on the final regulations.
The final regulations concerning information reporting apply to
sales of shares in calendar years beginning on or after July 8, 2016.
Taxpayers and brokers (as defined in Sec. 1.6045-1(a)(1)), however,
may rely on the rules in the regulations concerning information
reporting for sales of shares in calendar years beginning before July
8, 2016.
Statement of Availability for IRS Documents
IRS Revenue Procedures cited in this preamble are published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin and are available from the Superintendent of
Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by
visiting the IRS Web site at https://www.irs.gov.
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including this one, are exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866, as supplemented and reaffirmed
by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory impact assessment is
not required. It has also been determined that section 553(b) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to
these regulations, and because the regulations do not impose a
collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of
the Code, the proposed regulations preceding these final regulations
were submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on their impact on small businesses. No
comments were received.
Drafting Information
The principal author of the final regulations is Grace Cho, IRS
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and
Products). However, other personnel from the Treasury Department and
the IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by adding an
entry in numerical order to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.446-7 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 446.
0
Par. 2. Section 1.446-7 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 1.446-7 Net asset value method for certain money market fund
shares.
(a) In general. This section provides a permissible method of
accounting (the net asset value method, or NAV method) for gain or loss
on shares in a money market fund (or MMF).
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section--
(1) Computation period. Computation periods are the periods (of
either equal or varying length) that a taxpayer selects for computing
gain and loss under the NAV method for shares in an MMF. Computation
periods must possess all of the following attributes:
(i) Every day during the taxable year falls within one, and only
one, computation period;
(ii) Each computation period contains days from only one taxable
year; and
(iii) If the taxpayer is a regulated investment company (RIC) that
is not described in section 4982(f)--
(A) The same computation periods are used for purposes of both
income tax accounting under chapter 1 and excise tax computations under
section 4982; and
(B) The requirements in paragraphs (b)(1)(i) and (ii) of this
section are also satisfied if applied by substituting the RIC's section
4982 period for the RIC's taxable year.
(2) Ending value. The ending value of a taxpayer's shares in an MMF
for a computation period is the aggregate fair market value of the
taxpayer's shares at the end of that computation period.
(3) Fair market value. The fair market value of a share in an MMF
is determined as follows:
[[Page 44513]]
(i) Presumption based on applicable published redemption amount.
For purposes of this section, the fair market value of a share in an
MMF is presumed to be the applicable published redemption amount for
the share.
(ii) Published redemption amount. The published redemption amount
for a share in an MMF is the published amount for which the MMF would
redeem the share (usually, the net asset value per share (NAV)), taking
into account any corrections and not taking into account any liquidity
fee described in Rule 2a-7(c)(2) under the Investment Company Act of
1940 (17 CFR 270.2a-7(c)(2)).
(iii) Applicable published redemption amount. The applicable
published redemption amount is--
(A) For purposes of determining the ending value of a taxpayer's
shares in an MMF for a computation period under paragraph (b)(2) of
this section, the last published redemption amount on the last day of
that computation period;
(B) For purposes of determining the value of MMF shares received in
a redemption or exchange described in paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(A) of this
section, the published redemption amount for such MMF shares used to
determine the consideration received in the redemption or exchange, or
if the consideration received is not based on a published redemption
amount, the first published redemption amount for such MMF shares after
the redemption or exchange;
(C) For purposes of determining the amount received in a redemption
or exchange described in paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(B) of this section in
which the consideration received is based on a published redemption
amount for the redeemed shares, that published redemption amount; and
(D) For purposes of determining the amount received in an exchange
described in paragraph (b)(5)(ii)(B) of this section that is not
described in paragraph (b)(3)(iii)(C) of this section, or the amount of
any adjustment resulting from a disposition transaction described in
paragraph (b)(5)(iii) of this section, the first published redemption
amount for the exchanged or disposed of MMF shares after the exchange
or other transaction.
(iv) Facts and circumstances determination. If there is no
applicable published redemption amount or if circumstances indicate
that the amount does not represent the fair market value of a share in
the MMF, the fair market value is determined on the basis of all of the
facts and circumstances.
(4) Money market fund (or MMF). An MMF is a regulated investment
company that is permitted to hold itself out to investors as a money
market fund under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(17 CFR 270.2a-7). See paragraph (c)(5) of this section for the
treatment of shares in a single MMF held in more than one account.
(5) Net investment--(i) In general. The net investment in an MMF
for a computation period may be a positive amount, a negative amount,
or zero. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(5)(iii) of this section,
the net investment is equal to--
(A) The aggregate cost of shares in the MMF purchased during the
computation period (including purchases through reinvestment of
dividends); minus
(B) The aggregate amount received during the computation period in
redemption of (or otherwise in exchange for) shares in the MMF in
transactions in which gain or loss would be recognized if the taxpayer
did not apply the NAV method to the shares.
(ii) Aggregate amount received. For purposes of paragraph
(b)(5)(i)(B) of this section, the amount received in a redemption or
exchange of an MMF share is--
(A) If no property other than cash and shares in one or more other
MMFs is received, the amount of any cash plus the fair market value of
any MMF shares received; or
(B) If any property other than cash or shares in one or more other
MMFs is received, the fair market value of the redeemed MMF share.
(iii) Adjustments--(A) Dispositions in which gain or loss is not
recognized. If, during the computation period, any shares in an MMF are
disposed of in transactions in which gain or loss would not be
recognized if the taxpayer did not apply the NAV method to the shares,
the net investment in the MMF for the computation period is decreased
by the fair market value of each such share at the time of its
disposition.
(B) Acquisitions other than by purchase. If, during the computation
period, any shares in an MMF are acquired other than by purchase, the
net investment in the MMF for the computation period is increased by
the adjusted basis (for purposes of determining loss) of each such
share immediately after its acquisition. If the adjusted basis of an
acquired share would be determined by reference to the basis of a share
or shares in an MMF that are being disposed of by the taxpayer in a
transaction that is governed by paragraph (b)(5)(iii)(A) of this
section, then the adjusted basis of each such disposed share is treated
for purposes of this section as being the fair market value of that
share at the time of its disposition. If the adjusted basis of an
acquired share would be determined by reference to the basis of that
share in the hands of the person from whom the share is acquired and
that person was applying the NAV method to the share at the time of the
transaction, then the adjusted basis of the share in the hands of the
person from whom the share is acquired is treated for purposes of this
section as being the fair market value of that share at the time of the
transaction.
(6) Section 4982 period. If a taxpayer using the NAV method is a
RIC to which section 4982 applies, the section 4982 period is the one-
year period with respect to which gain or loss is determined for
purposes of section 4982(e)(2) and (e)(6). The preceding sentence is
applied taking into account the application of section 4982(e)(4). See
paragraph (c)(8) of this section regarding the application of section
4982(e)(6).
(7) Starting basis. The starting basis of a taxpayer's shares in an
MMF for a computation period is--
(i) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(7)(ii) of this section, the
ending value of the taxpayer's shares in the MMF for the immediately
preceding computation period; or
(ii) For the first computation period in a taxable year, if the
taxpayer did not use the NAV method for shares in the MMF for the
immediately preceding taxable year, the aggregate adjusted basis of the
taxpayer's shares in the MMF at the end of the immediately preceding
taxable year.
(c) NAV method--(1) Scope. A taxpayer may use the NAV method
described in this section to determine the gain or loss for a taxable
year on the taxpayer's shares in an MMF. A taxpayer may have different
methods of accounting, different computation periods, and gains or
losses of differing character, for its shares in different MMFs. See
paragraph (c)(5) of this section for the treatment of shares in a
single MMF held in more than one account. See paragraph (c)(6) of this
section for rules applicable to RICs to which section 4982 applies. See
paragraph (c)(8) of this section for rules applicable to accounting
method changes.
(2) Net gain or loss for a taxable year--(i) Determination for each
computation period. Subject to any adjustment under paragraph
(c)(2)(ii) of this section, the net gain or loss for each computation
period with respect to the shares in an MMF to which the NAV method
applies equals the ending value, minus the starting basis, minus the
net investment in the MMF for the
[[Page 44514]]
computation period. If the computation produces a result that is
greater than zero, the taxpayer has a gain for the computation period
with respect to the shares in the MMF; if the computation produces a
result that is less than zero, the taxpayer has a loss for the
computation period with respect to the shares in the MMF; and if the
computation produces a result that is equal to zero, the taxpayer has
no gain or loss for the computation period with respect to the shares
in the MMF.
(ii) Adjustment of gain or loss to reflect any basis adjustments.
If, during a computation period, there is any downward (or upward)
adjustment to the taxpayer's basis in the shares in the MMF under any
provision of internal revenue law, then the net gain or loss for the
computation period on shares in the MMF determined under paragraph
(c)(2)(i) of this section is increased (or decreased) by the amount of
the adjustment.
(iii) Timing of gains and losses. Gain or loss determined under the
NAV method with respect to a taxpayer's shares in an MMF during a
computation period is treated as arising on the last day of the
computation period.
(iv) Determination of net gain or loss for each taxable year. The
taxpayer's net gain or loss for a taxable year on shares in an MMF is
the sum of the net gains or losses on shares in the MMF for the
computation period (or computation periods) that comprise the taxable
year.
(3) Character--(i) In the case of a taxpayer that applies the NAV
method to shares in an MMF, the gain or loss with respect to those
shares for a computation period is treated as gain or loss from a sale
or exchange of a capital asset provided the sale or exchange of one or
more of those shares during the computation period would give rise to
capital gain or loss if the taxpayer did not apply the NAV method to
the shares.
(ii) In the case of a taxpayer that applies the NAV method to
shares in an MMF, the gain or loss with respect to those shares for a
computation period is treated as ordinary gain or loss provided the
sale or exchange of every one of those shares during the computation
period would give rise to ordinary gain or loss if the taxpayer did not
apply the NAV method to the shares.
(iii) See paragraph (c)(5) of this section for the treatment of
shares in a single MMF held in more than one account.
(4) Holding period. Capital gains and losses determined under the
NAV method are treated as short-term capital gains and losses.
(5) More than one account. If a taxpayer holds shares in an MMF
through more than one account, the taxpayer must treat its holdings in
each account as a separate MMF for purposes of this section. A taxpayer
therefore may have different methods of accounting, different
computation periods, and gains or losses of differing character, for
its shares of a single MMF held in different accounts.
(6) Consistency requirement for MMF shareholders that are RICs. If
the taxpayer is a RIC that is not described in section 4982(f) (and
therefore is subject to the section 4982 excise tax), then, for each
MMF, the taxpayer must use the NAV method for both income tax and
excise tax computations or for neither computation. See paragraph
(c)(5) of this section for the treatment of shares in a single MMF held
in more than one account. See paragraph (c)(8)(ii) of this section for
changes to or from the NAV method by a RIC.
(7) Treatment of ordinary gains and losses under section
4982(e)(6). Under section 4982(e)(6)(B), this section is a specified
mark to market provision, and therefore any ordinary gains and losses
determined under the NAV method are governed by section 4982(e)(6)(A).
(8) Accounting method changes--(i) In general. A change to or from
the NAV method is a change in method of accounting to which the
provisions of section 446 and the accompanying regulations apply. A
taxpayer seeking to change to or from the NAV method must secure the
consent of the Commissioner in accordance with Sec. 1.446-1(e) and
follow the administrative procedures issued under Sec. 1.446-
1(e)(3)(ii) for obtaining the Commissioner's consent to change the
taxpayer's accounting method. Any such change will be made on a cut-off
basis. Because there will be no duplication or omission of amounts as a
result of such a change to or from the NAV method, no adjustment under
section 481(a) will be required or permitted.
(ii) RICs--(A) In general. A RIC that is subject to the excise tax
under section 4982 and that changes to or from the NAV method for its
shares in an MMF for income tax purposes must apply the new method for
excise tax purposes starting with the first day of the RIC's income tax
year of change. If that first day is not the first day of the RIC's
section 4982 period that ends in or with the RIC's income tax year,
then solely for purposes of applying the NAV method to compute the
RIC's required distribution for the calendar year that ends with or
within the RIC's income tax year of change, the section 4982 period is
bifurcated into two portions, each of which is treated as a separate
taxable year. The first portion begins on the first day of the section
4982 period and ends on the last day of the RIC's income tax year that
precedes the year of change. The second portion begins on the first day
of the income tax year of change and ends on the last day of the
section 4982 period.
(B) Example. If a RIC that holds MMF shares as capital assets
changes from a realization method to the NAV method for its income tax
year ending January 31, 2019, the section 4982 period is bifurcated
into two portions that are treated as separate taxable years solely for
purposes of applying this section. For the portion starting on November
1, 2017, and ending on January 31, 2018, the RIC applies its
realization method for excise tax purposes. For the portion starting on
February 1, 2018, and ending on October 31, 2018, the RIC applies the
NAV method for excise tax purposes, treating February 1, 2018, as the
first day of the RIC's tax year for purposes of paragraphs (b)(1) and
(6) of this section. The RIC's net gain or loss for this later portion
is determined under paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this section. This net
gain or loss and any gains and losses for the earlier portion
determined under the realization method are taken into account in
determining the RIC's capital gain net income for the full one-year
period described in section 4982(b)(1)(B).
(d) Example. The provisions of this section may be illustrated by
the following example:
Example. (i) Fund is an MMF. Shareholder is a person whose
taxable year is the calendar year. On January 1 of Year 1,
Shareholder owns 5,000,000 shares in Fund with an adjusted basis of
$5,000,000.00. The price of Fund shares has not varied from $1.00
from the date Shareholder acquired the shares through January 1 of
Year 1. During that period, Shareholder has engaged in multiple
purchases and redemptions of Fund shares, but Shareholder has
reported no gains or losses with respect to the shares because
Shareholder realized an amount in each redemption equal to
Shareholder's basis in the redeemed shares. During Year 1, the price
of Fund shares begins to float. During Year 1, Shareholder receives
$32,158.23 in taxable dividends from Fund and makes 120 purchases of
additional shares in Fund (including purchases through the
reinvestment of those dividends) totaling $1,253,256.37 and 28
redemptions totaling $1,124,591.71. The fair market value of
Shareholder's shares in Fund at the end of Year 1 is $5,129,750.00.
All of Shareholder's shares in Fund are held in a single account and
as capital assets. There is no adjustment to the basis in
Shareholder's shares in Fund under any provision of internal revenue
law during Year 1.
(ii) Prior to Year 1, Shareholder has had no gains or losses to
report with respect to the
[[Page 44515]]
Fund shares under a realization method and no changes in fair market
value that would have been reported under the NAV method. Therefore,
Shareholder may use the NAV method for the shares in Fund for Year
1. Shareholder uses the NAV method for the shares with its taxable
year as the computation period. Shareholder's net investment in Fund
for Year 1 equals $128,664.66 (the $1,253,256.37 in purchases, minus
the $1,124,591.71 in redemptions). Shareholder's Year 1 gain
therefore is $1,085.34, which is the ending value of Shareholder's
shares ($5,129,750.00), minus the starting basis of Shareholder's
shares ($5,000,000.00), minus Shareholder's net investment in the
fund for the taxable year ($128,664.66). The gain of $1,085.34 is
treated as short-term capital gain. Shareholder's starting basis for
Year 2 is $5,129,750.00. Shareholder also must include the
$32,158.23 in dividends in its income for Year 1 in the same manner
as if Shareholder did not use the NAV method.
(iii) If Shareholder had instead adopted the calendar month as
its computation period, it would have used the NAV method for every
month of Year 1, even though prices of Fund shares may have been
fixed for some months.
(e) Effective/applicability date. Except as provided in the
following sentence, this section applies to taxable years ending on or
after July 8, 2016. For taxable years ending on or after July 28, 2014,
and beginning before July 8, 2016, however, shareholders of MMFs may
rely either on this section or on Sec. 1.446-7 of the 2014 proposed
regulations REG-107012-14 (79 FR 43694).
0
Par. 3. Section 1.6045-1 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(3)(vi) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1.6045-1 Returns of information of brokers and barter exchanges.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) Money market funds--(A) In general. No return of information
is required with respect to a sale of shares in a regulated investment
company that is permitted to hold itself out to investors as a money
market fund under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(17 CFR 270.2a-7).
(B) Effective/applicability date. Paragraph (c)(3)(vi)(A) of this
section applies to sales of shares in calendar years beginning on or
after July 8, 2016. Taxpayers and brokers (as defined in Sec. 1.6045-
1(a)(1)), however, may rely on paragraph (c)(3)(vi)(A) of this section
for sales of shares in calendar years beginning before July 8, 2016.
* * * * *
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: June 15, 2016.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016-16149 Filed 7-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P