Medication Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorders Reporting Requirements, 44576-44579 [2016-16069]
Download as PDF
44576
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
alternative coverage subsequently
terminates for the employee or for any
other member of the employee’s
expected tax family, regardless of
whether the opt-out payment is required
to be adjusted or terminated due to the
loss of alternative coverage, and
regardless of whether the employee is
required to provide notice of the loss of
alternative coverage to the employer.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 8. Section 1.5000A–5 is amended
by revising paragraph (c).
after ‘‘1094 series’’, and removing ‘‘1095
series’’.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2016–15940 Filed 7–6–16; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 8
RIN 0930–AA22
§ 1.5000A–5
procedure.
Administration and
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Effective/applicability date. (1)
Except as provided in paragraph (c)(2),
this section and §§ 1.5000A–1 through
1.5000A–4 apply for months beginning
after December 31, 2013.
(2) Paragraph (e)(3)(ii)(G) of
§ 1.5000A–3 applies to months
beginning after December 31, 2016.
■ Par. 9. Revise § 1.6011–8 to read as
follows:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1.6011–8 Requirement of income tax
return for taxpayers who claim the premium
tax credit under section 36B.
(a) Requirement of return. Except as
otherwise provided in this paragraph
(a), a taxpayer who receives the benefit
of advance payments of the premium
tax credit under section 36B must file an
income tax return for that taxable year
on or before the due date for the return
(including extensions of time for filing)
and reconcile the advance credit
payments. However, if advance credit
payments are made for coverage of an
individual for whom no taxpayer claims
a personal exemption deduction, the
taxpayer who attests to the Exchange to
the intention to claim a personal
exemption deduction for the individual
as part of the determination that the
taxpayer is eligible for advance credit
payments must file a tax return and
reconcile the advance credit payments.
(b) Effective/applicability date. Except
as otherwise provided, this section
applies for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2016. Paragraph (a) of
§ 1.6011–8 as contained in 26 CFR part
I edition revised as of April 1, 2016,
applies to taxable years ending after
December 31, 2013, and beginning
before January 1, 2017.
§ 301.6011–2
[Amended]
Par. 10. Section 301.6011–2(b)(1) is
amended by adding ‘‘1095–B, 1095–C’’
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
Medication Assisted Treatment for
Opioid Use Disorders Reporting
Requirements
Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), HHS.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
On March 30, 2016, the U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) published a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to
increase the highest patient limit for
qualified physicians to treat opioid use
disorder under section 303(g)(2) of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA). On
July 6, 2016, HHS published a final rule
based on the NPRM but delayed
finalizing the reporting requirements
outlined in the NPRM. In this
Supplemental Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (SNPRM), HHS seeks
further comment on the same reporting
requirements outlined in the NPRM.
These reporting requirements would
require annual reporting by
practitioners who are approved to treat
up to 275 patients under subpart F to
help HHS ensure compliance with the
requirements of the ‘‘Medication
Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use
Disorders’’ final rule published
elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register. HHS will consider the public
comments on this SNPRM as well as
any comments already received on the
March 30, 2016 NPRM before issuing a
final rule pertaining to the reporting
requirements.
DATES: To be assured consideration,
comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later
than 5 p.m. on August 8, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Regulatory Information
Number (RIN) 0930–AA22, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronically: Federal eRulemaking
Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Regular Mail or Hand Delivery or
Courier: Written comments mailed by
regular mail must be sent to the
following address ONLY: The Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration, Department of Health
and Human Services, Attn: Jinhee Lee,
SAMHSA, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room
13E21C, Rockville, Maryland 20857.
Please allow sufficient time for mailed
comments to be received before the
close of the comment period.
• Express or Overnight Mail: Written
comments sent by hand delivery, or
regular, express or overnight mail must
be sent to the following address ONLY:
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration,
Department of Health and Human
Services, Attn: Jinhee Lee, SAMHSA,
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 13E21C,
Rockville, Maryland 20857.
Instructions: To avoid duplication,
please submit only one copy of your
comments by only one method. All
submissions received must include the
agency name and docket number or RIN
for this rulemaking. All comments
received will become a matter of public
record and will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process
and viewing public comments, see the
‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jinhee Lee, Pharm.D., Public Health
Advisor, Center for Substance Abuse
Treatment, 240–276–0545, Email
address: WaiverRegulations@
samhsa.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose
The purpose of this Supplemental
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(SNPRM) is to solicit additional
comment on the proposed reporting
requirements in the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS)
March 30, 2016 Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) on Medication
Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use
Disorders under section 303(g)(2) of the
Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (81 FR
17639). These requirements will assist
HHS in ensuring practitioner
compliance with the requirements of 42
CFR part 8, subpart F.
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
B. Summary of Major Provisions
These proposed regulatory provisions,
which amend § 8.635 of 42 CFR part 8,
subpart F, would establish annual
reporting requirements for practitioners
who are approved to treat up to 275
patients under 42 CFR part 8, subpart F.
C. Summary of Impacts
A summary of the anticipated impact
of the reporting requirements, along
with the other provisions of 42 CFR part
8, subpart F, was provided in the
NPRM, dated March 30, 2016. Please see
the NPRM, I. Executive Summary,
Paragraph C (Summary of Impacts) for a
summary of impacts of the reporting
requirements in the context of 42 CFR
part 8, subpart F.
II. Public Participation
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Comments Invited
HHS invites interested parties to
submit comments on all aspects of this
proposal. All comments received before
the close of the comment period are
available for viewing by the public,
including any personally identifiable
and/or confidential information that is
included in a comment. We post all
comments received as soon as possible
after they have been received on the
following Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the search
instructions on that Web site to view
public comments.
Comments received before the close of
the comment period will also be
available for public inspection,
generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of the proposed
rule, at the headquarters of the
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857,
Monday through Friday of each week
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. To schedule
an appointment to view public
comments, call 240–276–1660.
We will consider all comments we
receive by the date and time specified
in the DATES section of this preamble,
and will respond to the comments in the
preamble of the final rule. Please allow
sufficient time for mailed comments to
be received before the close of the
comment period.
III. Background
On March 30, 2016 HHS issued a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Medication Assisted
Treatment for Opioid Use Disorders’’ in
the Federal Register. Elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register, HHS is
publishing a final rule with the same
title. That final rule increases access to
medication-assisted treatment (MAT)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
with certain medications, including
buprenorphine and combination
buprenorphine/naloxone (hereinafter
referred to as buprenorphine)
medications, in office-based setting as
authorized under 21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2).
Section 303(g)(2) of the CSA (21 U.S.C.
823(g)(2)) allows individual
practitioners to dispense or prescribe
Schedule III, IV, or V controlled
substances that have been approved by
the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). Section 303(g)(2)(B)(iii) of the
CSA allows qualified practitioners who
file an initial notification of intent (NOI)
to treat a maximum of 30 patients at a
time. After 1 year, the practitioner may
file a second NOI indicating his/her
intent to treat up to 100 patients at a
time. The final rule expands access to
MAT by allowing eligible practitioners
to request approval to treat up to 275
patients under section 303(g)(2) of the
CSA. The final rule also includes
requirements to help ensure that
patients receive the full array of services
that comprise evidence-based MAT and
minimize the risk that the medications
provided for treatment are misused or
diverted.
The proposed regulatory provisions in
this SNPRM will help HHS assess
practitioner compliance with the
requirements of 42 CFR part 8, subpart
F.
IV. Summary of SNPRM
In the NPRM, HHS proposed 42 CFR,
part 8, subpart F, § 8.635 to describe the
reporting requirements for practitioners
whose Request for Patient Limit
Increase is approved under § 8.625. The
purpose of the reporting requirements is
to help HHS assess practitioner
compliance with the additional
responsibilities of practitioners who are
authorized to treat up to the higher
patient limit, as outlined in the MAT
final rule published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register. Reporting
is an integral component of HHS’s
approach to increase access to MAT
while helping to ensure that patients
receive the full array of services that
comprise evidence-based MAT and
minimize the risk that the medications
provided for treatment are misused or
diverted. While HHS received many
comments on the burden of these
requirements, the comments did not
provide specific suggestions on how
HHS can ensure compliance in a
manner that is not overly burdensome to
practitioners. HHS seeks additional
comment on the proposed reporting
requirements:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
44577
a. The average monthly caseload of
patients receiving buprenorphinebased MAT, per year
b. Percentage of active buprenorphine
patients (patients in treatment as of
reporting date) that received
psychosocial or case management
services (either by direct provision or
by referral) in the past year due to:
1. Treatment initiation
2. Change in clinical status
c. Percentage of patients who had a
prescription drug monitoring program
query in the past month
d. Number of patients at the end of the
reporting year who:
1. Have completed an appropriate
course of treatment with
buprenorphine in order for the
patient to achieve and sustain
recovery
2. Are not being seen by the provider
due to referral by the provider to a
more or less intensive level of care
3. No longer desire to continue use of
buprenorphine
4. Are no longer receiving
buprenorphine for reasons other
than 1–3.
In addition, HHS seeks comment on
the following questions:
Are there different or additional
elements that should be reported in
order to assist HHS in ensuring
compliance with the final rule?
Are there ways in which some
elements can be combined that will
lessen the burden for reporting
practitioners while maintaining the
important function of collecting
information that ensure compliance
with the final rule?
Are there other ways that HHS can
collect the necessary information to
ensure compliance with the final rule?
Would it be less burdensome to report
on the number of patients in treatment
for each month of the reporting period
that:
(i) Were provided counseling services
at the same location as the practitioner,
and how frequently those patients
utilized the counseling services;
(ii) the practitioner referred for
counseling services at a different
location?
Would it be less burdensome to report
on the number of patients at the end of
the reporting year who had terminated
utilization of covered medications?
Are there other suggested changes that
would be less burdensome while
maintaining the important function of
collecting information that ensure
compliance with the final rule?
V. Collection of Information
Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), agencies are required to
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
44578
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
provide notice in the Federal Register
and solicit public comment before a
collection of information requirement is
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. In order to fairly evaluate
whether changes to an information
collection should be approved by the
OMB, section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA
requires that we solicit comment on the
following issues:
1. Whether the information collection
is necessary and useful to carry out the
proper functions of the agency;
2. The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the information collection
burden;
3. The quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and
4. Recommendations to minimize the
information collection burden on the
affected public, including automated
collection techniques.
Under the PRA, the time, effort, and
financial resources necessary to meet
the information collection requirements
referenced in this section are to be
considered in rulemaking. We explicitly
seek, and will consider, public comment
on our assumptions as they relate to the
PRA requirements summarized in this
section. This proposed rule includes
changes to information collection
requirements, that is, reporting,
recordkeeping or third-party disclosure
requirements, as defined under the PRA
(5 CFR part 1320). Some of the
provisions would involve changes from
the information collections set out in
the previous regulations.
Information collection requirements
would be:
Reporting, 42 CFR 8.635: Reporting
will be required annually to ensure that
eligibility requirements are being
maintained and that waiver conditions
are being fulfilled. Reporting
requirements may include a request for
information regarding: (1) The average
monthly caseload of patients receiving
buprenorphine-based MAT, per year; (2)
the percentage of active buprenorphine
patients (patients in treatment as of
reporting date) who received
psychosocial or case management
services (either by direct provision or by
referral) in the past year due to
treatment initiation or change in clinical
status; (3) Percentage of patients who
had a prescription drug monitoring
program query in the past month; (4)
Number of patients at the end of the
reporting year who: (a) Have completed
an appropriate course of treatment with
buprenorphine in order for the patient
to achieve and sustain recovery, (b) Are
not being seen by the provider due to
referral by the provider to a more or less
intensive level of care, (c) No longer
desire to continue use of
buprenorphine, (d) Are no longer
receiving buprenorphine for reasons
other than (a) through (c). To facilitate
public comment, we have placed a draft
version of the collection template in the
public docket.
Annual burden estimates for these
requirements are summarized in the
following table:
42 CFR Citation
Purpose of
submission
Number of
respondents
Responses/
respondent
Burden/
response
(hour)
Total burden
(hours)
Hourly wage
cost
($)
Total wage
cost
($)
8.635 .....................
Annual Report .......
1,350
1
3
4,050
64.47
261,104
For more detailed estimates, please
refer to the public docket, which
includes a copy of the draft supporting
statement submitted as part of the
NPRM and associated with this
information collection.
VI. Regulatory Impact Analysis
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
HHS has examined the impact of this
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866 on Regulatory Planning and
Review (September 30, 1993), Executive
Order 13563 on Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review (January 18,
2011), the Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980 (Pub. L. 96–354, September 19,
1980), the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4, March 22,
1995), and Executive Order 13132 on
Federalism (August 4, 1999) and
included it in the NPRM published on
March 30, 2016. Please refer to the
NPRM for this analysis (81 FR 17639).
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 8
Health professions, Methadone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, HHS proposes to amend 42
CFR part 8 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
PART 8—CERTIFICATION OF OPIOID
TREATMENT PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 8
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 823; 42 U.S.C. 257a,
290aa(d), 290dd–2, 300x–23, 300x–27(a),
300y–11.
■
2. Add § 8.635 to read as follows:
§ 8.635 What are the reporting
requirements for practitioners whose
Request for Patient Limit Increase is
approved?
(a) All practitioners whose Request for
Patient Limit Increase is approved
under § 8.625 must submit reports to
SAMHSA, along with documentation
and data, as requested by SAMHSA, to
demonstrate compliance with § 8.620,
applicable eligibility requirements
specified in § 8.610, and all attestation
requirements in § 8.620(b).
(b) Reporting requirements may
include a request for information
regarding:
(1) The average monthly caseload of
patients receiving buprenorphine-based
MAT, per year.
(2) Percentage of active
buprenorphine patients (patients in
treatment as of reporting date) that
received psychosocial or case
management services (either by direct
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
provision or by referral) in the past year
due to:
(i) Treatment initiation.
(ii) Change in clinical status.
(3) Percentage of patients who had a
prescription drug monitoring program
query in the past month; and
(4) Number of patients at the end of
the reporting year who:
(i) Have completed an appropriate
course of treatment with buprenorphine
in order for the patient to achieve and
sustain recovery.
(ii) Are not being seen by the provider
due to referral by the provider to a more
or less intensive level of care.
(iii) No longer desire to continue use
of buprenorphine.
(iv) Are no longer receiving
buprenorphine for reasons other than
paragraphs (b)(4)(i) through (iii) of this
section.
(c) The report must be submitted
within twelve months after the date that
a practitioner’s Request for Patient Limit
Increase is approved under § 8.625, and
annually thereafter.
(d) SAMHSA may check reports from
practitioners prescribing under the
higher patient limit against other
existing data sources, such as PDMPs. If
discrepancies between reported
information and other existing data are
identified, SAMHSA may require
additional documentation from
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 131 / Friday, July 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
practitioners whose reports are
identified as including these
discrepancies.
(e) Failure to submit reports under
this section, or deficient reports, may be
deemed a failure to satisfy the
requirements for a patient limit
increase, and may result in the
withdrawal of SAMHSA’s approval of
the practitioner’s Request for Patient
Limit Increase.
44579
Dated: June 30, 2016.
Kana Enomoto,
Principal Deputy Administrator, Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration.
Approved: June 30, 2016.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2016–16069 Filed 7–6–16; 8:45 am]
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:45 Jul 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\08JYP1.SGM
08JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 131 (Friday, July 8, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44576-44579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16069]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 8
RIN 0930-AA22
Medication Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorders Reporting
Requirements
AGENCY: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA), HHS.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On March 30, 2016, the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to
increase the highest patient limit for qualified physicians to treat
opioid use disorder under section 303(g)(2) of the Controlled
Substances Act (CSA). On July 6, 2016, HHS published a final rule based
on the NPRM but delayed finalizing the reporting requirements outlined
in the NPRM. In this Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(SNPRM), HHS seeks further comment on the same reporting requirements
outlined in the NPRM. These reporting requirements would require annual
reporting by practitioners who are approved to treat up to 275 patients
under subpart F to help HHS ensure compliance with the requirements of
the ``Medication Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorders'' final
rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. HHS
will consider the public comments on this SNPRM as well as any comments
already received on the March 30, 2016 NPRM before issuing a final rule
pertaining to the reporting requirements.
DATES: To be assured consideration, comments must be received at one of
the addresses provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on August 8, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) 0930-AA22, by any of the following methods:
Electronically: Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
Regular Mail or Hand Delivery or Courier: Written comments
mailed by regular mail must be sent to the following address ONLY: The
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Department
of Health and Human Services, Attn: Jinhee Lee, SAMHSA, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Room 13E21C, Rockville, Maryland 20857. Please allow sufficient
time for mailed comments to be received before the close of the comment
period.
Express or Overnight Mail: Written comments sent by hand
delivery, or regular, express or overnight mail must be sent to the
following address ONLY: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Attn: Jinhee
Lee, SAMHSA, 5600 Fishers Lane, Room 13E21C, Rockville, Maryland 20857.
Instructions: To avoid duplication, please submit only one copy of
your comments by only one method. All submissions received must include
the agency name and docket number or RIN for this rulemaking. All
comments received will become a matter of public record and will be
posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the rulemaking process and
viewing public comments, see the ``Public Participation'' heading of
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jinhee Lee, Pharm.D., Public Health
Advisor, Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, 240-276-0545, Email
address: WaiverRegulations@samhsa.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose
The purpose of this Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(SNPRM) is to solicit additional comment on the proposed reporting
requirements in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
March 30, 2016 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on Medication
Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorders under section 303(g)(2) of
the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) (81 FR 17639). These requirements
will assist HHS in ensuring practitioner compliance with the
requirements of 42 CFR part 8, subpart F.
[[Page 44577]]
B. Summary of Major Provisions
These proposed regulatory provisions, which amend Sec. 8.635 of 42
CFR part 8, subpart F, would establish annual reporting requirements
for practitioners who are approved to treat up to 275 patients under 42
CFR part 8, subpart F.
C. Summary of Impacts
A summary of the anticipated impact of the reporting requirements,
along with the other provisions of 42 CFR part 8, subpart F, was
provided in the NPRM, dated March 30, 2016. Please see the NPRM, I.
Executive Summary, Paragraph C (Summary of Impacts) for a summary of
impacts of the reporting requirements in the context of 42 CFR part 8,
subpart F.
II. Public Participation
Comments Invited
HHS invites interested parties to submit comments on all aspects of
this proposal. All comments received before the close of the comment
period are available for viewing by the public, including any
personally identifiable and/or confidential information that is
included in a comment. We post all comments received as soon as
possible after they have been received on the following Web site:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the search instructions on that Web
site to view public comments.
Comments received before the close of the comment period will also
be available for public inspection, generally beginning approximately 3
weeks after publication of the proposed rule, at the headquarters of
the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Monday through Friday of each
week from 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. To schedule an appointment to view
public comments, call 240-276-1660.
We will consider all comments we receive by the date and time
specified in the DATES section of this preamble, and will respond to
the comments in the preamble of the final rule. Please allow sufficient
time for mailed comments to be received before the close of the comment
period.
III. Background
On March 30, 2016 HHS issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ``Medication Assisted Treatment for Opioid Use Disorders'' in
the Federal Register. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register,
HHS is publishing a final rule with the same title. That final rule
increases access to medication-assisted treatment (MAT) with certain
medications, including buprenorphine and combination buprenorphine/
naloxone (hereinafter referred to as buprenorphine) medications, in
office-based setting as authorized under 21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2). Section
303(g)(2) of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2)) allows individual
practitioners to dispense or prescribe Schedule III, IV, or V
controlled substances that have been approved by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA). Section 303(g)(2)(B)(iii) of the CSA allows
qualified practitioners who file an initial notification of intent
(NOI) to treat a maximum of 30 patients at a time. After 1 year, the
practitioner may file a second NOI indicating his/her intent to treat
up to 100 patients at a time. The final rule expands access to MAT by
allowing eligible practitioners to request approval to treat up to 275
patients under section 303(g)(2) of the CSA. The final rule also
includes requirements to help ensure that patients receive the full
array of services that comprise evidence-based MAT and minimize the
risk that the medications provided for treatment are misused or
diverted.
The proposed regulatory provisions in this SNPRM will help HHS
assess practitioner compliance with the requirements of 42 CFR part 8,
subpart F.
IV. Summary of SNPRM
In the NPRM, HHS proposed 42 CFR, part 8, subpart F, Sec. 8.635 to
describe the reporting requirements for practitioners whose Request for
Patient Limit Increase is approved under Sec. 8.625. The purpose of
the reporting requirements is to help HHS assess practitioner
compliance with the additional responsibilities of practitioners who
are authorized to treat up to the higher patient limit, as outlined in
the MAT final rule published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register. Reporting is an integral component of HHS's approach to
increase access to MAT while helping to ensure that patients receive
the full array of services that comprise evidence-based MAT and
minimize the risk that the medications provided for treatment are
misused or diverted. While HHS received many comments on the burden of
these requirements, the comments did not provide specific suggestions
on how HHS can ensure compliance in a manner that is not overly
burdensome to practitioners. HHS seeks additional comment on the
proposed reporting requirements:
a. The average monthly caseload of patients receiving buprenorphine-
based MAT, per year
b. Percentage of active buprenorphine patients (patients in treatment
as of reporting date) that received psychosocial or case management
services (either by direct provision or by referral) in the past year
due to:
1. Treatment initiation
2. Change in clinical status
c. Percentage of patients who had a prescription drug monitoring
program query in the past month
d. Number of patients at the end of the reporting year who:
1. Have completed an appropriate course of treatment with
buprenorphine in order for the patient to achieve and sustain recovery
2. Are not being seen by the provider due to referral by the
provider to a more or less intensive level of care
3. No longer desire to continue use of buprenorphine
4. Are no longer receiving buprenorphine for reasons other than 1-
3.
In addition, HHS seeks comment on the following questions:
Are there different or additional elements that should be reported
in order to assist HHS in ensuring compliance with the final rule?
Are there ways in which some elements can be combined that will
lessen the burden for reporting practitioners while maintaining the
important function of collecting information that ensure compliance
with the final rule?
Are there other ways that HHS can collect the necessary information
to ensure compliance with the final rule?
Would it be less burdensome to report on the number of patients in
treatment for each month of the reporting period that:
(i) Were provided counseling services at the same location as the
practitioner, and how frequently those patients utilized the counseling
services;
(ii) the practitioner referred for counseling services at a
different location?
Would it be less burdensome to report on the number of patients at
the end of the reporting year who had terminated utilization of covered
medications?
Are there other suggested changes that would be less burdensome
while maintaining the important function of collecting information that
ensure compliance with the final rule?
V. Collection of Information Requirements
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), agencies are
required to
[[Page 44578]]
provide notice in the Federal Register and solicit public comment
before a collection of information requirement is submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. In order
to fairly evaluate whether changes to an information collection should
be approved by the OMB, section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA requires that
we solicit comment on the following issues:
1. Whether the information collection is necessary and useful to
carry out the proper functions of the agency;
2. The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the information
collection burden;
3. The quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Recommendations to minimize the information collection burden on
the affected public, including automated collection techniques.
Under the PRA, the time, effort, and financial resources necessary
to meet the information collection requirements referenced in this
section are to be considered in rulemaking. We explicitly seek, and
will consider, public comment on our assumptions as they relate to the
PRA requirements summarized in this section. This proposed rule
includes changes to information collection requirements, that is,
reporting, recordkeeping or third-party disclosure requirements, as
defined under the PRA (5 CFR part 1320). Some of the provisions would
involve changes from the information collections set out in the
previous regulations.
Information collection requirements would be:
Reporting, 42 CFR 8.635: Reporting will be required annually to
ensure that eligibility requirements are being maintained and that
waiver conditions are being fulfilled. Reporting requirements may
include a request for information regarding: (1) The average monthly
caseload of patients receiving buprenorphine-based MAT, per year; (2)
the percentage of active buprenorphine patients (patients in treatment
as of reporting date) who received psychosocial or case management
services (either by direct provision or by referral) in the past year
due to treatment initiation or change in clinical status; (3)
Percentage of patients who had a prescription drug monitoring program
query in the past month; (4) Number of patients at the end of the
reporting year who: (a) Have completed an appropriate course of
treatment with buprenorphine in order for the patient to achieve and
sustain recovery, (b) Are not being seen by the provider due to
referral by the provider to a more or less intensive level of care, (c)
No longer desire to continue use of buprenorphine, (d) Are no longer
receiving buprenorphine for reasons other than (a) through (c). To
facilitate public comment, we have placed a draft version of the
collection template in the public docket.
Annual burden estimates for these requirements are summarized in
the following table:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purpose of Number of Responses/ Burden/ Total burden Hourly wage Total wage cost
42 CFR Citation submission respondents respondent response (hour) (hours) cost ($) ($)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.635.......................... Annual Report.... 1,350 1 3 4,050 64.47 261,104
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more detailed estimates, please refer to the public docket,
which includes a copy of the draft supporting statement submitted as
part of the NPRM and associated with this information collection.
VI. Regulatory Impact Analysis
HHS has examined the impact of this proposed rule under Executive
Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning and Review (September 30, 1993),
Executive Order 13563 on Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
(January 18, 2011), the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-
354, September 19, 1980), the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4, March 22, 1995), and Executive Order 13132 on
Federalism (August 4, 1999) and included it in the NPRM published on
March 30, 2016. Please refer to the NPRM for this analysis (81 FR
17639).
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 8
Health professions, Methadone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, HHS proposes to amend 42
CFR part 8 as follows:
PART 8--CERTIFICATION OF OPIOID TREATMENT PROGRAMS
0
1. The authority citation for part 8 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 823; 42 U.S.C. 257a, 290aa(d), 290dd-2,
300x-23, 300x-27(a), 300y-11.
0
2. Add Sec. 8.635 to read as follows:
Sec. 8.635 What are the reporting requirements for practitioners
whose Request for Patient Limit Increase is approved?
(a) All practitioners whose Request for Patient Limit Increase is
approved under Sec. 8.625 must submit reports to SAMHSA, along with
documentation and data, as requested by SAMHSA, to demonstrate
compliance with Sec. 8.620, applicable eligibility requirements
specified in Sec. 8.610, and all attestation requirements in Sec.
8.620(b).
(b) Reporting requirements may include a request for information
regarding:
(1) The average monthly caseload of patients receiving
buprenorphine-based MAT, per year.
(2) Percentage of active buprenorphine patients (patients in
treatment as of reporting date) that received psychosocial or case
management services (either by direct provision or by referral) in the
past year due to:
(i) Treatment initiation.
(ii) Change in clinical status.
(3) Percentage of patients who had a prescription drug monitoring
program query in the past month; and
(4) Number of patients at the end of the reporting year who:
(i) Have completed an appropriate course of treatment with
buprenorphine in order for the patient to achieve and sustain recovery.
(ii) Are not being seen by the provider due to referral by the
provider to a more or less intensive level of care.
(iii) No longer desire to continue use of buprenorphine.
(iv) Are no longer receiving buprenorphine for reasons other than
paragraphs (b)(4)(i) through (iii) of this section.
(c) The report must be submitted within twelve months after the
date that a practitioner's Request for Patient Limit Increase is
approved under Sec. 8.625, and annually thereafter.
(d) SAMHSA may check reports from practitioners prescribing under
the higher patient limit against other existing data sources, such as
PDMPs. If discrepancies between reported information and other existing
data are identified, SAMHSA may require additional documentation from
[[Page 44579]]
practitioners whose reports are identified as including these
discrepancies.
(e) Failure to submit reports under this section, or deficient
reports, may be deemed a failure to satisfy the requirements for a
patient limit increase, and may result in the withdrawal of SAMHSA's
approval of the practitioner's Request for Patient Limit Increase.
Dated: June 30, 2016.
Kana Enomoto,
Principal Deputy Administrator, Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration.
Approved: June 30, 2016.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2016-16069 Filed 7-6-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P