Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Removal of Stage II Gasoline Vapor Recovery Requirements, 42597-42600 [2016-15617]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Proposed Rules
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 22, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2016–15618 Filed 6–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2015–0522; FRL–9948–51–
Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Removal of
Stage II Gasoline Vapor Recovery
Requirements
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio
EPA) on July 15, 2015 and February 29,
2016, concerning the state’s Stage II
vapor recovery (Stage II) program for the
Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Dayton
ozone areas in Ohio. The revision
removes Stage II requirements for the
three areas as a component of the Ohio
ozone SIP. The submittal also includes
a demonstration as required by the
Clean Air Act (CAA) that addresses
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
emissions impacts associated with the
removal of the program.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before August 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2015–0522 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
persoon.carolyn@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the ‘‘For Further
Information Contact’’ section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Francisco J. Acevedo, Mobile Source
Program Manager, Control Strategies
Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6061,
acevedo.francisco@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section is arranged as follows:
I. Background
II. What changes have been made to the
Ohio Stage II vapor recovery program?
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the state’s
submittal?
IV. What action is EPA proposing to take?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Stage II and onboard refueling vapor
recovery systems (ORVR) are two types
of emission control systems that capture
fuel vapors from vehicle gas tanks
during refueling. Stage II systems are
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42597
specifically installed at gasoline
dispensing facilities (GDF) and capture
the refueling fuel vapors at the gasoline
pump nozzle. The system carries the
vapors back to the underground storage
tank at the GDF to prevent the vapors
from escaping to the atmosphere. ORVR
systems are carbon canisters installed
directly on automobiles to capture the
fuel vapors evacuated from the gasoline
tank before they reach the nozzle. The
fuel vapors captured in the carbon
canisters are then combusted in the
engine when the automobile is in
operation. Stage II and vehicle ORVR
were initially both required by the 1990
Amendments to the CAA under sections
182(b)(3) and 202(a)(6), respectively. In
some areas Stage II has been in place for
over 25 years, but Stage II was not
widely implemented by the states until
the early to mid-1990s as a result of the
CAA requirements for moderate,
serious, severe, and extreme ozone
nonattainment areas, and for states in
the Northeast Ozone Transport Region
(OTR) under CAA section 184(b)(2).
CAA section 202(a)(6) required EPA
to promulgate regulations for ORVR for
light-duty vehicles (passenger cars).
EPA adopted these requirements in
1994, at which point moderate ozone
nonattainment areas were no longer
subject to the section 182(b)(3) Stage II
requirement. However, some moderate
areas retained Stage II requirements to
provide a control method to comply
with rate-of-progress emission reduction
targets. ORVR equipment has been
phased in for new passenger vehicles
beginning with model year 1998, and
starting in 2001 for light-duty trucks and
most heavy-duty gasoline-powered
vehicles. ORVR equipment has been
installed on nearly all new gasolinepowered light-duty vehicles, light-duty
trucks and heavy-duty vehicles since
2006.
During the phase-in of ORVR controls,
Stage II has provided volatile organic
compound (VOC) reductions in ozone
nonattainment areas and certain
attainment areas of the OTR. Congress
recognized that ORVR and Stage II
would eventually become largely
redundant technologies, and provided
authority to EPA to allow states to
remove Stage II from their SIPs after
EPA finds that ORVR is in widespread
use.
Effective May 16, 2012 (77 FR 28772),
EPA determined that ORVR is in
widespread nationwide use for control
of gasoline emissions during refueling of
vehicles at GDFs. Currently, more than
75 percent of gasoline refueling
nationwide occurs with ORVR-equipped
vehicles, so Stage II programs have
become largely redundant control
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
42598
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Proposed Rules
systems and Stage II systems achieve an
ever declining emissions benefit as more
ORVR-equipped vehicles continue to
enter the on-road motor vehicle fleet.1
EPA also exercised its authority under
CAA section 202(a)(6) to waive certain
Federal statutory requirements for Stage
II gasoline vapor recovery at GDFs. This
decision exempts all new ozone
nonattainment areas classified serious
or above from the requirement to adopt
Stage II control programs. Similarly, any
state currently implementing Stage II
programs may submit SIP revisions that,
once approved by EPA, would allow for
the phase out of Stage II control
systems. To assist states in the
development of SIP revisions to remove
Stage II requirements from their SIPs,
EPA released its ‘‘Guidance on
Removing Stage II Gasoline Vapor
Control Programs from State
Implementation Plans and Assessing
Comparable Measures’’ (EPA–457/B–
12–001) on August 7, 2012.
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
II. What changes have been made to the
Ohio Stage II vapor recovery program?
The Ohio EPA originally submitted a
SIP revision to EPA on June 7, 1993, to
satisfy the requirement of section
182(b)(3) of the CAA. The revision
applied to the Cleveland (Ashtabula,
Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain,
Medina, Portage and Summit counties),
Cincinnati (Butler, Clermont, Hamilton
and Warren counties), and Dayton
(Clark, Greene, Miami and Montgomery
counties) ozone nonattainment areas in
Ohio. EPA partially approved Ohio’s
Stage II program on October 20, 1994
(59 FR 52911), including the program’s
legal authority and administrative
requirements found in the Ohio
Administrative Code (OAC) rules 3745–
21–09 (DDD)(1)–(4).
As a result of EPA’s May 16, 2012
determination that ORVR is in
widespread nationwide use for control
of gasoline emissions during refueling of
vehicles at GDFs, Ohio EPA initiated a
rulemaking process to revise its SIP to
remove Stage II requirements for all
facilities in the Cleveland, Cincinnati
and Dayton areas. As part of that
rulemaking process, an Ohio-specific
analysis following EPA’s recommended
methodology was also completed. The
analysis concluded that, starting in
calendar year 2017, ORVR would be in
1 In areas where certain types of vacuum-assist
Stage II systems are used, the differences in
operational design characteristics between ORVR
and some configurations of these Stage II systems
result in the reduction of overall control system
efficiency compared to what could have been
achieved relative to the individual control
efficiencies of either ORVR or Stage II emissions
from the vehicle fuel tank.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
widespread use in Ohio and that there
would be no remaining emissions
reduction benefit from Stage II
requirements beyond the benefits from
ORVR.
On July 15, 2015, and February 29,
2016, the Ohio EPA submitted a SIP
revision requesting EPA approval of
amendments to OAC 3745–21–09 (DDD)
that removes Stage II requirements from
the Ohio ozone SIP and allows GDFs
currently implementing Stage II in the
Cleveland, Cincinnati and Dayton areas
to decommission their systems by 2017.
To support the removal of the Stage II
requirements, the revision included
amended copies of OAC 3745–21–09
(DDD), as adopted on April 29, 2013,
and January 17, 2014; a summary of
Ohio-specific calculations based on EPA
guidance used to calculate program
benefits and demonstrate widespread
use of ORVR in Ohio; and a section
110(l) demonstration that includes
documentation that addresses the
period, 2013–2017, when Stage II
requirements were waived in Ohio but
widespread use of ORVR has not yet
occurred.
III. What is EPA’s analysis of the state’s
submittal?
EPA’s primary consideration for
determining the approvability of Ohio’s
request is whether this requested action
complies with section 110(l) of the
CAA.2
Section 110(l) requires that a revision
to the SIP not interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further
progress (as defined in section 171), or
any other applicable requirement of the
Act. EPA evaluates each section 110(l)
noninterference demonstration on a
case-by-case basis considering the
circumstances of each SIP revision. EPA
interprets 110(l) as applying to all
national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS) that are in effect, including
those that have been promulgated but
for which EPA has not yet made
designations. The degree of the analysis
focused on any particular NAAQS in a
noninterference demonstration varies
depending on the nature of the
emissions associated with the proposed
SIP revision.
In its July 15, 2015, and February 29,
2016, SIP revision, the Ohio EPA used
EPA’s guidance to conduct a series of
calculations to determine the potential
impact of removing the Stage II program
on air quality.3 Ohio EPA’s analysis
2 CAA section 193 is not relevant because Ohio’s
Stage II rule was not included in the SIP before the
1990 CAA amendments.
3 EPA, Guidance on Removing Stage II Gasoline
Vapor Control Program from State Implementation
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
focused on VOC emissions because, as
mentioned previously, Stage II
requirements affect VOC emissions and
because VOCs are a precursor for
ground-level ozone formation.4
Ohio EPA has calculated that
beginning in 2017, ORVR will be in
widespread use in all three program
areas and the absence of the Ohio Stage
II program starting in 2017 would not
result in a net VOC emissions increase
compared to the continued utilization of
this emissions control technology. The
emission reduction losses resulting from
removing Stage II before 2017 are
transitional and relatively small since
ORVR-equipped vehicles will continue
to phase into the fleet over the coming
years. Ohio EPA’s calculation indicates
a maximum potential loss of 1.858 tons
per summer day (tpsd) in Cleveland,
0.914 tpsd in Cincinnati, and 0.655 tpsd
in Dayton from 2013 through 2016. In
2013, the year with the highest level of
emission increases, these summer day
emissions increases are only 0.21
percent to 0.26 percent of the typical
summer day VOC emissions rate in the
three areas. These emissions increases
Plans and Assessing Comparable Measure, EPA–
457/B–12–001 (August 7, 2012), available at: https://
www.epa.gov/groundlevelozone/pdfs/
20120807guidance.pdf. This guidance document
notes that ‘‘the potential emission control losses
from removing Stage II vapor recovery systems
(VRS) are transitional and relatively small. ORVRequipped vehicles will continue to phase in to the
fleet over the coming years and will exceed 80
percent for all highway gasoline vehicles and 85
percent of all gasoline dispensed during 2015. As
the number of these ORVE-equipped vehicles
increase, the control of attributed to Stage II VRS
will decrease even further, and the potential
foregone Stage II VOC emission reductions are
generally expected to be no more than one percent
of the VOC inventory in the area.’’
4 Cleveland is currently designated nonattainment
for the 2012 Annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5)
NAAQS. While VOC is one of the precursors for
PM2.5 formation, a study (Journal of Environmental
Engineering—Qualifying the sources of ozone, fine
particulate matter, and regional haze in the
Southeastern United States, June 24, 2009, available
at: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journalofenvironmental-management) indicates that in
portions the Midwest (including portions of Ohio)
where Stage II has been implemented, emissions of
PM2.5 and the precursor sulfur dioxide (SO2) are
more significant to ambient PM2.5 concentrations
than nitrogen oxides (NOx) and VOC. Specifically,
PM2.5 sensitivities to anthropogenic VOC emissions
are near zero for the entire region, including the
Cincinnati region. This study also indicated that the
impact of SO2 emission, especially from electric
generating units, was most significant in the
Cincinnati area due to SO2 emissions in the entire
mid-west region (Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana,
Michigan, and Ohio). In fact, emissions from the
mid-west had the largest effect in the Cleveland and
Dayton areas. The technical analysis has met EPA’s
guidance and demonstrates anthropogenic VOCs are
insignificant to the formation of PM2.5 in these
areas. Currently, the Cleveland area is also
designated nonattainment for sulfur dioxide (Lake
Co.) and lead (Cuyahoga Co.) and those pollutants
are not affected by the removal of Stage II
requirements.
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Proposed Rules
are insignificant with respect to the total
summer day VOC emission rates of all
sectors in these areas. Also it is
important to note that the minimal
emissions increase significantly
decreases over the next two years (2014
and 2015) and becomes an emissions
decrease in 2017 and all years
thereafter.
To help offset the initial emissions
increases during the Stage II phase out
period, Ohio EPA is requiring the
installation of low permeation hoses at
GDFs. Ohio EPA has calculated that low
permeation hoses will provide 42.9 tons
of VOC emission reductions each year
during the ozone seasons (21.4 tons for
Cleveland area, 13.6 tons for Cincinnati
42599
area, and 7.9 for Dayton area) starting in
2013. Table 1 shows the increase of
emissions associated with the phase out
of State II systems at facilities in all
program areas in Ohio starting in 2013,
as well as offset emissions associated
with the requirement of low permeation
hoses at GDFs.
TABLE 1—VOC EMISSIONS DURING OZONE SEASON
[Tons per day]
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
Cleveland Area
Stage II Phase-out ...............................................................
Low Permeation Hoses ........................................................
0.910
¥0.14
0.580
¥0.14
0.300
¥0.14
0.068
¥0.14
¥0.116
¥0.14
Daily Total ............................................................................
Typical Summer Day ...........................................................
% of Summer Day ...............................................................
0.77
367.17
0.21%
0.44
367.17
0.12%
0.16
367.17
0.043%
¥0.072
367.17
¥0.019%
¥0.26
367.17
¥0.26%
Cincinnati Area
Stage II Phase-out ...............................................................
Low Permeation Hoses ........................................................
0.440
¥0.089
0.284
¥0.089
0.151
¥0.089
0.039
¥0.089
¥0.053
¥0.089
Daily Total ............................................................................
Typical Summer Day ...........................................................
% of Summer Day ...............................................................
0.35
147.05
0.24%
0.20
147.05
0.13%
0.062
147.05
0.042%
¥0.050
147.05
¥0.034%
¥0.14
147.05
¥0.096%
Dayton Area
2014
0.310
¥0.052
2015
0.201
¥0.052
2016
0.110
¥0.052
2017
0.034
¥0.052
¥0.027
¥0.052
Daily Total ............................................................................
Typical Summer Day ...........................................................
% of Summer Day ...............................................................
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
2013 .....................................................................................
Stage II Phase-out ...............................................................
Low Permeation Hoses ........................................................
0.26
99.66
0.26%
0.15
99.66
0.15%
0.058
99.66
0.058%
¥0.018
99.66
¥0.018%
¥0.079
99.66
¥0.079%
As illustrated in Table 1, and
documented in Ohio’s SIP revision, for
each year prior to the widespread use of
ORVR in Ohio (2017) starting in 2013,
the VOC emissions increase associated
with the removal of Stage II systems is
eventually offset by the VOC emission
reductions attributed to ORVR being in
widespread use in Ohio and the
requirement of low permeation hoses at
GDFs.
EPA believes that the removal of the
Ohio Stage II program does not interfere
with Ohio’s ability to demonstrate
compliance with the 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in all three areas. This is based
on the use of permanent, enforceable,
contemporaneous, surplus emissions
reductions achieved through the
requirement of low permeation hoses at
GDFs, and the fact that the small
emissions increase is both temporary
and insignificant with respect to the
total summer day emission rates for
sectors in these areas.
EPA also examined whether the
removal of Stage II program
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
requirements in all three areas will
interfere with attainment of other air
quality standards. All the counties in
the Dayton area are designated
attainment for all standards, including
sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide.
Cincinnati is designated attainment for
all standards other than ozone and
sulfur dioxide. The Cleveland area is
designated attainment for all standards
other than ozone, lead (Cuyahoga Co.),
sulfur dioxide (Lake Co.) and particulate
matter (Cuyahoga and Lorain Counties).
Based on Ohio EPA’s 110(l) analysis,
EPA has no reason to believe that the
removal of the Stage II program in Ohio
will cause the areas to become
nonattainment for any of these
pollutants. In addition, EPA believes
that removing the Stage II program
requirements in Ohio will not interfere
with the areas’ ability to meet any other
CAA requirement.
Based on the above discussion and
the state’s section 110(l) demonstration,
EPA believes that removal of the Stage
II program would not interfere with
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
attainment or maintenance of any of the
NAAQS in the Cleveland, Cincinnati,
and Dayton areas and would not
interfere with any other applicable
requirement of the CAA, and thus, are
approvable under CAA section 110(l).
IV. What action is EPA proposing to
take?
EPA is proposing to approve the
revision to the Ohio ozone SIP
submitted by Ohio EPA on July 15,
2015, and February 26, 2016, because
we find that the revision meets all
applicable requirements and it would
not interfere with reasonable further
progress or attainment of any of the
NAAQS.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
Ohio rule 3745–21–09 ‘‘Control of
emissions of volatile organic
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
42600
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
compounds from stationary sources and
perchloroethylene from dry cleaning
facilities.’’ effective January 17, 2014.
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these documents generally
available through www.regulations.gov
and/or at the EPA Region 5 Office
(please contact the person identified in
the ‘‘For Further Information Contact’’
section of this preamble for more
information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: June 27, 2016.
Robert Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2016–15617 Filed 6–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0846; FRL–9948–39–
Region 9]
Promulgation of Air Quality
Implementation Plans; Arizona;
Regional Haze Federal Implementation
Plan; Reconsideration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to revise
provisions of the Arizona Regional Haze
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP)
applicable to the Phoenix Cement
Company (PCC) Clarkdale Plant and the
CalPortland Cement (CPC) Rillito Plant.
In response to requests for
reconsideration from the plants’ owners,
we propose to replace the control
technology optimization requirements
for nitrogen oxides (NOX) applicable to
Kiln 4 at the Clarkdale Plant and Kiln
4 at the Rillito Plant with a series of
revised recordkeeping and reporting
requirements. We are seeking comment
on this proposed action.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before August 15, 2016.
Requests for a public hearing must be
received on or before July 15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2015–0846 at https://
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
limaye.vijay@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vijay Limaye, U.S. EPA, Region 9,
Planning Office, Air Division, AIR–2, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105. Vijay Limaye can be reached at
telephone number (415) 972–3086 and
via electronic mail at limaye.vijay@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. General Information
II. Background
III. Proposed FIP Revision for the PCC
Clarkdale Plant and the CPC Rillito Plant
IV. The EPA’s Proposed Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. General Information
A. Definitions
For the purpose of this document, we
are giving meaning to certain words or
initials as follows:
• The words or initials Act or CAA
mean or refer to the Clean Air Act,
unless the context indicates otherwise.
• The initials ADEQ mean or refer to
the Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality.
• The words Arizona and State mean
the State of Arizona.
• The initials BART mean or refer to
Best Available Retrofit Technology.
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 126 (Thursday, June 30, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42597-42600]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15617]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2015-0522; FRL-9948-51-Region 5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Removal of Stage II Gasoline Vapor
Recovery Requirements
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA) on July 15, 2015 and
February 29, 2016, concerning the state's Stage II vapor recovery
(Stage II) program for the Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Dayton ozone
areas in Ohio. The revision removes Stage II requirements for the three
areas as a component of the Ohio ozone SIP. The submittal also includes
a demonstration as required by the Clean Air Act (CAA) that addresses
emissions impacts associated with the removal of the program.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2015-0522 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
persoon.carolyn@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the
full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Francisco J. Acevedo, Mobile Source
Program Manager, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-
18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6061,
acevedo.francisco@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section is arranged as follows:
I. Background
II. What changes have been made to the Ohio Stage II vapor
recovery program?
III. What is EPA's analysis of the state's submittal?
IV. What action is EPA proposing to take?
V. Incorporation by Reference
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
Stage II and onboard refueling vapor recovery systems (ORVR) are
two types of emission control systems that capture fuel vapors from
vehicle gas tanks during refueling. Stage II systems are specifically
installed at gasoline dispensing facilities (GDF) and capture the
refueling fuel vapors at the gasoline pump nozzle. The system carries
the vapors back to the underground storage tank at the GDF to prevent
the vapors from escaping to the atmosphere. ORVR systems are carbon
canisters installed directly on automobiles to capture the fuel vapors
evacuated from the gasoline tank before they reach the nozzle. The fuel
vapors captured in the carbon canisters are then combusted in the
engine when the automobile is in operation. Stage II and vehicle ORVR
were initially both required by the 1990 Amendments to the CAA under
sections 182(b)(3) and 202(a)(6), respectively. In some areas Stage II
has been in place for over 25 years, but Stage II was not widely
implemented by the states until the early to mid-1990s as a result of
the CAA requirements for moderate, serious, severe, and extreme ozone
nonattainment areas, and for states in the Northeast Ozone Transport
Region (OTR) under CAA section 184(b)(2).
CAA section 202(a)(6) required EPA to promulgate regulations for
ORVR for light-duty vehicles (passenger cars). EPA adopted these
requirements in 1994, at which point moderate ozone nonattainment areas
were no longer subject to the section 182(b)(3) Stage II requirement.
However, some moderate areas retained Stage II requirements to provide
a control method to comply with rate-of-progress emission reduction
targets. ORVR equipment has been phased in for new passenger vehicles
beginning with model year 1998, and starting in 2001 for light-duty
trucks and most heavy-duty gasoline-powered vehicles. ORVR equipment
has been installed on nearly all new gasoline-powered light-duty
vehicles, light-duty trucks and heavy-duty vehicles since 2006.
During the phase-in of ORVR controls, Stage II has provided
volatile organic compound (VOC) reductions in ozone nonattainment areas
and certain attainment areas of the OTR. Congress recognized that ORVR
and Stage II would eventually become largely redundant technologies,
and provided authority to EPA to allow states to remove Stage II from
their SIPs after EPA finds that ORVR is in widespread use.
Effective May 16, 2012 (77 FR 28772), EPA determined that ORVR is
in widespread nationwide use for control of gasoline emissions during
refueling of vehicles at GDFs. Currently, more than 75 percent of
gasoline refueling nationwide occurs with ORVR-equipped vehicles, so
Stage II programs have become largely redundant control
[[Page 42598]]
systems and Stage II systems achieve an ever declining emissions
benefit as more ORVR-equipped vehicles continue to enter the on-road
motor vehicle fleet.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In areas where certain types of vacuum-assist Stage II
systems are used, the differences in operational design
characteristics between ORVR and some configurations of these Stage
II systems result in the reduction of overall control system
efficiency compared to what could have been achieved relative to the
individual control efficiencies of either ORVR or Stage II emissions
from the vehicle fuel tank.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA also exercised its authority under CAA section 202(a)(6) to
waive certain Federal statutory requirements for Stage II gasoline
vapor recovery at GDFs. This decision exempts all new ozone
nonattainment areas classified serious or above from the requirement to
adopt Stage II control programs. Similarly, any state currently
implementing Stage II programs may submit SIP revisions that, once
approved by EPA, would allow for the phase out of Stage II control
systems. To assist states in the development of SIP revisions to remove
Stage II requirements from their SIPs, EPA released its ``Guidance on
Removing Stage II Gasoline Vapor Control Programs from State
Implementation Plans and Assessing Comparable Measures'' (EPA-457/B-12-
001) on August 7, 2012.
II. What changes have been made to the Ohio Stage II vapor recovery
program?
The Ohio EPA originally submitted a SIP revision to EPA on June 7,
1993, to satisfy the requirement of section 182(b)(3) of the CAA. The
revision applied to the Cleveland (Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake,
Lorain, Medina, Portage and Summit counties), Cincinnati (Butler,
Clermont, Hamilton and Warren counties), and Dayton (Clark, Greene,
Miami and Montgomery counties) ozone nonattainment areas in Ohio. EPA
partially approved Ohio's Stage II program on October 20, 1994 (59 FR
52911), including the program's legal authority and administrative
requirements found in the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) rules 3745-21-
09 (DDD)(1)-(4).
As a result of EPA's May 16, 2012 determination that ORVR is in
widespread nationwide use for control of gasoline emissions during
refueling of vehicles at GDFs, Ohio EPA initiated a rulemaking process
to revise its SIP to remove Stage II requirements for all facilities in
the Cleveland, Cincinnati and Dayton areas. As part of that rulemaking
process, an Ohio-specific analysis following EPA's recommended
methodology was also completed. The analysis concluded that, starting
in calendar year 2017, ORVR would be in widespread use in Ohio and that
there would be no remaining emissions reduction benefit from Stage II
requirements beyond the benefits from ORVR.
On July 15, 2015, and February 29, 2016, the Ohio EPA submitted a
SIP revision requesting EPA approval of amendments to OAC 3745-21-09
(DDD) that removes Stage II requirements from the Ohio ozone SIP and
allows GDFs currently implementing Stage II in the Cleveland,
Cincinnati and Dayton areas to decommission their systems by 2017. To
support the removal of the Stage II requirements, the revision included
amended copies of OAC 3745-21-09 (DDD), as adopted on April 29, 2013,
and January 17, 2014; a summary of Ohio-specific calculations based on
EPA guidance used to calculate program benefits and demonstrate
widespread use of ORVR in Ohio; and a section 110(l) demonstration that
includes documentation that addresses the period, 2013-2017, when Stage
II requirements were waived in Ohio but widespread use of ORVR has not
yet occurred.
III. What is EPA's analysis of the state's submittal?
EPA's primary consideration for determining the approvability of
Ohio's request is whether this requested action complies with section
110(l) of the CAA.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ CAA section 193 is not relevant because Ohio's Stage II rule
was not included in the SIP before the 1990 CAA amendments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 110(l) requires that a revision to the SIP not interfere
with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress (as defined in section 171), or any other applicable
requirement of the Act. EPA evaluates each section 110(l)
noninterference demonstration on a case-by-case basis considering the
circumstances of each SIP revision. EPA interprets 110(l) as applying
to all national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) that are in
effect, including those that have been promulgated but for which EPA
has not yet made designations. The degree of the analysis focused on
any particular NAAQS in a noninterference demonstration varies
depending on the nature of the emissions associated with the proposed
SIP revision.
In its July 15, 2015, and February 29, 2016, SIP revision, the Ohio
EPA used EPA's guidance to conduct a series of calculations to
determine the potential impact of removing the Stage II program on air
quality.\3\ Ohio EPA's analysis focused on VOC emissions because, as
mentioned previously, Stage II requirements affect VOC emissions and
because VOCs are a precursor for ground-level ozone formation.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ EPA, Guidance on Removing Stage II Gasoline Vapor Control
Program from State Implementation Plans and Assessing Comparable
Measure, EPA-457/B-12-001 (August 7, 2012), available at: https://www.epa.gov/groundlevelozone/pdfs/20120807guidance.pdf. This
guidance document notes that ``the potential emission control losses
from removing Stage II vapor recovery systems (VRS) are transitional
and relatively small. ORVR-equipped vehicles will continue to phase
in to the fleet over the coming years and will exceed 80 percent for
all highway gasoline vehicles and 85 percent of all gasoline
dispensed during 2015. As the number of these ORVE-equipped vehicles
increase, the control of attributed to Stage II VRS will decrease
even further, and the potential foregone Stage II VOC emission
reductions are generally expected to be no more than one percent of
the VOC inventory in the area.''
\4\ Cleveland is currently designated nonattainment for the 2012
Annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS. While VOC
is one of the precursors for PM2.5 formation, a study
(Journal of Environmental Engineering--Qualifying the sources of
ozone, fine particulate matter, and regional haze in the
Southeastern United States, June 24, 2009, available at: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-ofenvironmental-management)
indicates that in portions the Midwest (including portions of Ohio)
where Stage II has been implemented, emissions of PM2.5
and the precursor sulfur dioxide (SO2) are more
significant to ambient PM2.5 concentrations than nitrogen
oxides (NOx) and VOC. Specifically, PM2.5 sensitivities
to anthropogenic VOC emissions are near zero for the entire region,
including the Cincinnati region. This study also indicated that the
impact of SO2 emission, especially from electric
generating units, was most significant in the Cincinnati area due to
SO2 emissions in the entire mid-west region (Wisconsin,
Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio). In fact, emissions from the
mid-west had the largest effect in the Cleveland and Dayton areas.
The technical analysis has met EPA's guidance and demonstrates
anthropogenic VOCs are insignificant to the formation of
PM2.5 in these areas. Currently, the Cleveland area is
also designated nonattainment for sulfur dioxide (Lake Co.) and lead
(Cuyahoga Co.) and those pollutants are not affected by the removal
of Stage II requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ohio EPA has calculated that beginning in 2017, ORVR will be in
widespread use in all three program areas and the absence of the Ohio
Stage II program starting in 2017 would not result in a net VOC
emissions increase compared to the continued utilization of this
emissions control technology. The emission reduction losses resulting
from removing Stage II before 2017 are transitional and relatively
small since ORVR-equipped vehicles will continue to phase into the
fleet over the coming years. Ohio EPA's calculation indicates a maximum
potential loss of 1.858 tons per summer day (tpsd) in Cleveland, 0.914
tpsd in Cincinnati, and 0.655 tpsd in Dayton from 2013 through 2016. In
2013, the year with the highest level of emission increases, these
summer day emissions increases are only 0.21 percent to 0.26 percent of
the typical summer day VOC emissions rate in the three areas. These
emissions increases
[[Page 42599]]
are insignificant with respect to the total summer day VOC emission
rates of all sectors in these areas. Also it is important to note that
the minimal emissions increase significantly decreases over the next
two years (2014 and 2015) and becomes an emissions decrease in 2017 and
all years thereafter.
To help offset the initial emissions increases during the Stage II
phase out period, Ohio EPA is requiring the installation of low
permeation hoses at GDFs. Ohio EPA has calculated that low permeation
hoses will provide 42.9 tons of VOC emission reductions each year
during the ozone seasons (21.4 tons for Cleveland area, 13.6 tons for
Cincinnati area, and 7.9 for Dayton area) starting in 2013. Table 1
shows the increase of emissions associated with the phase out of State
II systems at facilities in all program areas in Ohio starting in 2013,
as well as offset emissions associated with the requirement of low
permeation hoses at GDFs.
Table 1--VOC Emissions During Ozone Season
[Tons per day]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cleveland Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stage II Phase-out.............. 0.910 0.580 0.300 0.068 -0.116
Low Permeation Hoses............ -0.14 -0.14 -0.14 -0.14 -0.14
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daily Total..................... 0.77 0.44 0.16 -0.072 -0.26
Typical Summer Day.............. 367.17 367.17 367.17 367.17 367.17
% of Summer Day................. 0.21% 0.12% 0.043% -0.019% -0.26%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cincinnati Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stage II Phase-out.............. 0.440 0.284 0.151 0.039 -0.053
Low Permeation Hoses............ -0.089 -0.089 -0.089 -0.089 -0.089
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daily Total..................... 0.35 0.20 0.062 -0.050 -0.14
Typical Summer Day.............. 147.05 147.05 147.05 147.05 147.05
% of Summer Day................. 0.24% 0.13% 0.042% -0.034% -0.096%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dayton Area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2013............................ 2014 2015 2016 2017
Stage II Phase-out.............. 0.310 0.201 0.110 0.034 -0.027
Low Permeation Hoses............ -0.052 -0.052 -0.052 -0.052 -0.052
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daily Total..................... 0.26 0.15 0.058 -0.018 -0.079
Typical Summer Day.............. 99.66 99.66 99.66 99.66 99.66
% of Summer Day................. 0.26% 0.15% 0.058% -0.018% -0.079%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As illustrated in Table 1, and documented in Ohio's SIP revision,
for each year prior to the widespread use of ORVR in Ohio (2017)
starting in 2013, the VOC emissions increase associated with the
removal of Stage II systems is eventually offset by the VOC emission
reductions attributed to ORVR being in widespread use in Ohio and the
requirement of low permeation hoses at GDFs.
EPA believes that the removal of the Ohio Stage II program does not
interfere with Ohio's ability to demonstrate compliance with the 8-hour
ozone NAAQS in all three areas. This is based on the use of permanent,
enforceable, contemporaneous, surplus emissions reductions achieved
through the requirement of low permeation hoses at GDFs, and the fact
that the small emissions increase is both temporary and insignificant
with respect to the total summer day emission rates for sectors in
these areas.
EPA also examined whether the removal of Stage II program
requirements in all three areas will interfere with attainment of other
air quality standards. All the counties in the Dayton area are
designated attainment for all standards, including sulfur dioxide and
nitrogen dioxide. Cincinnati is designated attainment for all standards
other than ozone and sulfur dioxide. The Cleveland area is designated
attainment for all standards other than ozone, lead (Cuyahoga Co.),
sulfur dioxide (Lake Co.) and particulate matter (Cuyahoga and Lorain
Counties). Based on Ohio EPA's 110(l) analysis, EPA has no reason to
believe that the removal of the Stage II program in Ohio will cause the
areas to become nonattainment for any of these pollutants. In addition,
EPA believes that removing the Stage II program requirements in Ohio
will not interfere with the areas' ability to meet any other CAA
requirement.
Based on the above discussion and the state's section 110(l)
demonstration, EPA believes that removal of the Stage II program would
not interfere with attainment or maintenance of any of the NAAQS in the
Cleveland, Cincinnati, and Dayton areas and would not interfere with
any other applicable requirement of the CAA, and thus, are approvable
under CAA section 110(l).
IV. What action is EPA proposing to take?
EPA is proposing to approve the revision to the Ohio ozone SIP
submitted by Ohio EPA on July 15, 2015, and February 26, 2016, because
we find that the revision meets all applicable requirements and it
would not interfere with reasonable further progress or attainment of
any of the NAAQS.
V. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference Ohio rule 3745-21-09 ``Control of emissions of volatile
organic
[[Page 42600]]
compounds from stationary sources and perchloroethylene from dry
cleaning facilities.'' effective January 17, 2014. EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents generally available through
www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact
the person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact''
section of this preamble for more information).
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 27, 2016.
Robert Kaplan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2016-15617 Filed 6-29-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P