Safety Zone; Ohio River Mile 317-318, Ashland, KY, 42528-42530 [2016-15572]
Download as PDF
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
42528
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
connecting the following points:
Beginning at Point 1 in position
25°48′38″ N, 80°10′40″ W; thence east to
Point 2 in position 25°48′38″ N,
80°10′30″ W; thence southwest to Point
3 in position 25°46′41″ N, 80°10′54″ W;
thence southeast to Point 4 in position
25°46′17″ N, 80°10′43″ W; thence
southwest to Point 5 in position
25°45′05″ N, 80°10′50″ W; thence
southeast to Point 6 in position
25°44′47″ N, 80°10′44″ W; thence
southeast to Point 7 in position
25°43′29″ N, 80°09′37″ W; thence
southwest to Point 8 in position
25°42′39″ N, 80°10′35″ W; thence
southwest to Point 9 in position
25°31′11″ N, 80°13′06″ W; thence
northwest to Point 10 in position
25°31′31″ N, 80°17′48″ W; thence
northeast to Point 11 in position
25°43′25″ N, 80°13′17″ W; thence
northeast to Point 12 in position
25°43′59″ N, 80°12′04″ W; thence
northeast to Point 13 in position
25°44′46″ N, 80°11′23″ W; thence
northeast to Point 14 in position
25°46′10″ N, 80°10′59″ W; thence
northwest to Point 15 in position
25°46′20″ N, 80°11′04″ W; thence
northeast to Point 16 in position
25°46′44″ N, 80°10′59″ W; thence
northwest to Point 17 in position
25°47′15″ N, 80°11′06″ W; thence
northeast to Point 18 in position
25°47′24″ N, 80°11′00″ W; thence north
to Point 19 in position 25°47′36″ N,
80°11′00″ W; thence back to origin. All
coordinates are North American Datum
1983.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Miami in the
enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations. All vessels within the
regulated area are required to transit at
no more than 15 knots; are subject to
control by the Coast Guard officers and
petty officers; and must follow the
instructions of designated
representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be in enforced with actual notice
from 7 p.m. to 11:59 on July 4, 2016.
Dated: June 24, 2016.
A.J. Gould,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2016–15508 Filed 6–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0616]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Ohio River Mile 317–318,
Ashland, KY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
all waters of the Ohio River from mile
317 to mile 318, Ashland, KY. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to
protect persons and property from
potential damage and safety hazards
during a fireworks display on or over a
navigable waterway. During the period
of enforcement entry into this safety
zone is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Ohio Valley or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 9:35 to
10:45 p.m. on July 2, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
0616 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Third Class Robert
Miller; telephone (304) 733–0198, email
STL-PF-MSUHUNTINGTON-MEC@
uscg.mil.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency finds good
cause that those procedures are
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
fireworks displays on or over the
navigable waterway poses safety
concerns for waterway users. On March
7, 2016, the Coast Guard published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled, ‘‘Sector Ohio Valley Annual
and Recurring Safety Zones Update’’ (81
FR 11706). In the NPRM, the Coast
Guard proposed to amend and update
its list of recurring safety zone
regulations that take place in the Coast
Guard Sector Ohio Valley area of
responsibility (AOR). The public
comment period ended on June 6, 2016.
The Coast Guard did not receive
comments on the NPRM. The Coast
Guard issued a final rule on June 14,
2016, finalizing the events proposed in
the NPRM, and the rule became
effective on June 14, 2016 (see 81 FR
38595).
Before the comment period closed,
the Coast Guard received new
information regarding the Party in the
Park event, listed in Table 1, Line 13 of
33 CFR 165.801. For 2016, the event
sponsor requested that the event be held
on July 2 instead of July 4, which was
the date proposed in the NPRM. Due to
the date of the event, it is impracticable
to publish an NPRM for this date change
because we must establish this safety
zone by July 2, 2016. If the event
sponsor decides to continue to hold the
event annually on July 2, the Coast
Guard will publish an NPRM in the
Federal Register to permanently change
the event date.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making the
rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying the effective date of the rule is
contrary to the public interest as it
would delay the effectiveness of the
temporary safety zone needed to
respond to potential related safety
hazards until after the planned
fireworks display.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
COTP has determined that potential
hazards associated with fireworks
displays taking place on or over this
section of navigable waterway will be a
safety concern for anyone within the
area designated as the safety zone. This
rule is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment in
E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM
30JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
the navigable waters within the safety
zone during the fireworks display.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a temporary
safety zone from 9:35 until 10:45 p.m.
on July 2, 2016 for all waters of the Ohio
River from mile 317 to mile 318, for the
Party in the Park Fireworks Display in
Ashland, KY. This safety zone is
intended to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment in these
navigable waters during the fireworks
display. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
This temporary final rule establishes
a safety zone that will be enforced for
a limited time period. During the
enforcement period, vessels are
prohibited from entering into or
remaining within the safety zone unless
specifically authorized by the COTP or
a designated representative. Based on
the location, limited safety zone size,
and short duration of the enforcement
period, this rule does not pose a
significant regulatory impact.
Additionally, notice of the safety zone
or any changes in the planned schedule
will be made via Broadcast Notices to
Mariners and Local Notices to Mariners.
Deviation from this rule may be
requested from the COTP or a
designated representative and will be
considered on a case-by-case basis.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A. above,
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42529
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that the actions are one of
a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting less than two hours that
will limit access to a specific area on the
Ohio River. This safety zone is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM
30JNR1
42530
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0502]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Ohio River Mile 607.5 to
608.6, Indiana
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0616 to read as
follows:
■
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
§ 165.T08–0616 Safety Zone; Ohio River,
Mile 317 to Mile 318, Ashland, KY.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the Ohio River
from mile 317 to mile 318.
(b) Enforcement period. This safety
zone will be enforced from 9:35 until
10:45 p.m. on July 2, 2016. Actual
notice will be used for enforcement
purposes.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23, entry
into this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Ohio Valley (COTP) or
designated personnel. Persons or vessels
desiring to enter into or pass through
the zone must request permission from
the COTP or a designated
representative. They may be contacted
on VHF–FM radio channel 16 or phone
at 1–800–253–7465.
(2) Persons and vessels permitted to
deviate from this safety zone regulation
and enter the restricted area must transit
at the slowest safe speed and comply
with all lawful directions issued by the
COTP or a designated representative.
(d) Information broadcasts. The COTP
or a designated representative will
inform the public through Broadcast
Notices to Mariners, Local Notices to
Mariners, and/or Safety Marine
Information Broadcasts as appropriate of
the enforcement period for each safety
zone as well as any changes in the
planned and published dates and times
of enforcement.
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:00 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
■
[FR Doc. 2016–15572 Filed 6–29–16; 8:45 am]
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
R.V. Timme,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Ohio Valley.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
all waters of the Ohio River from mile
607.5 to mile 608.6. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to protect
persons and property from potential
damage and safety hazards during a
fireworks display on or over the
navigable waterway. During the period
of enforcement, entry into this safety
zone is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Ohio Valley or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 10:30
p.m. until 11:00 p.m. on July 3, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
0502 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer James Robinson,
Sector Ohio Valley, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone (502) 779–5347, email
James.C.Robinson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency finds good
cause that those procedures are
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
fireworks displays on or over the
navigable waterway poses safety
concerns for waterway users. On March
7, 2016, the Coast Guard published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled, ‘‘Sector Ohio Valley Annual
and Recurring Safety Zones Update’’ (81
FR 11706). In the NPRM, the Coast
Guard proposed to amend and update
its list of recurring safety zone
regulations that take place in the Coast
Guard Sector Ohio Valley area of
responsibility (AOR). The public
comment period ended on June 6, 2016.
The Coast Guard did not receive
comments on the NPRM. The Coast
Guard issued a final rule on June 14,
2016, finalizing the events proposed in
the NPRM, and the rule became
effective on June 14, 2016 (see 81 FR
38595).
Before the comment period closed,
the Coast Guard received new
information regarding the Riverfront
Independence Festival Fireworks
Display, listed in Table 1 of 33 CFR
165.801, Line 21. For 2016, the event
sponsor requested that the event be held
at Ohio River mile 607.5 to mile 608.6
instead of Ohio River, mile 602.0 to mile
603.5, which is the location listed in the
NPRM and current CFR. It is
impracticable to publish a NPRM for
this location change because we must
establish this safety zone by July 3,
2016. If the event sponsor decides to
continue to hold the event annually at
Ohio River mile 607.5 to mile 608.6, the
Coast Guard will publish an NPRM in
the Federal Register to permanently
change the event location.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making the
rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying the effective date of the rule is
contrary to the public interest as it
would delay the effectiveness of the
temporary safety zone needed to
respond to potential related safety
hazards until after the planned
fireworks display.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
COTP has determined that potential
hazards associated with fireworks
displays taking place on or over this
section of navigable waterway will be a
safety concern for anyone within the
area designated as the safety zone. This
E:\FR\FM\30JNR1.SGM
30JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 126 (Thursday, June 30, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 42528-42530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15572]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0616]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Ohio River Mile 317-318, Ashland, KY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all waters of the Ohio River from mile 317 to mile 318, Ashland, KY.
This temporary safety zone is necessary to protect persons and property
from potential damage and safety hazards during a fireworks display on
or over a navigable waterway. During the period of enforcement entry
into this safety zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port (COTP) Ohio Valley or a designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9:35 to 10:45 p.m. on July 2, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0616 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Third Class Robert Miller; telephone (304)
733-0198, email STL-PF-MSUHUNTINGTON-MEC@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency finds good cause that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because fireworks displays on or over the
navigable waterway poses safety concerns for waterway users. On March
7, 2016, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled, ``Sector Ohio Valley Annual and Recurring Safety Zones
Update'' (81 FR 11706). In the NPRM, the Coast Guard proposed to amend
and update its list of recurring safety zone regulations that take
place in the Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley area of responsibility
(AOR). The public comment period ended on June 6, 2016. The Coast Guard
did not receive comments on the NPRM. The Coast Guard issued a final
rule on June 14, 2016, finalizing the events proposed in the NPRM, and
the rule became effective on June 14, 2016 (see 81 FR 38595).
Before the comment period closed, the Coast Guard received new
information regarding the Party in the Park event, listed in Table 1,
Line 13 of 33 CFR 165.801. For 2016, the event sponsor requested that
the event be held on July 2 instead of July 4, which was the date
proposed in the NPRM. Due to the date of the event, it is impracticable
to publish an NPRM for this date change because we must establish this
safety zone by July 2, 2016. If the event sponsor decides to continue
to hold the event annually on July 2, the Coast Guard will publish an
NPRM in the Federal Register to permanently change the event date.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making the rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the
effective date of the rule is contrary to the public interest as it
would delay the effectiveness of the temporary safety zone needed to
respond to potential related safety hazards until after the planned
fireworks display.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The COTP has determined that potential hazards associated with
fireworks displays taking place on or over this section of navigable
waterway will be a safety concern for anyone within the area designated
as the safety zone. This rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment in
[[Page 42529]]
the navigable waters within the safety zone during the fireworks
display.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a temporary safety zone from 9:35 until 10:45
p.m. on July 2, 2016 for all waters of the Ohio River from mile 317 to
mile 318, for the Party in the Park Fireworks Display in Ashland, KY.
This safety zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in these navigable waters during the fireworks
display. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
This temporary final rule establishes a safety zone that will be
enforced for a limited time period. During the enforcement period,
vessels are prohibited from entering into or remaining within the
safety zone unless specifically authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative. Based on the location, limited safety zone size, and
short duration of the enforcement period, this rule does not pose a
significant regulatory impact. Additionally, notice of the safety zone
or any changes in the planned schedule will be made via Broadcast
Notices to Mariners and Local Notices to Mariners. Deviation from this
rule may be requested from the COTP or a designated representative and
will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that the
actions are one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a safety zone lasting less than two hours that will limit
access to a specific area on the Ohio River. This safety zone is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
[[Page 42530]]
coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received
without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or
vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-0616 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-0616 Safety Zone; Ohio River, Mile 317 to Mile 318,
Ashland, KY.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Ohio River from mile 317 to mile 318.
(b) Enforcement period. This safety zone will be enforced from 9:35
until 10:45 p.m. on July 2, 2016. Actual notice will be used for
enforcement purposes.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23, entry into this zone is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley (COTP) or designated
personnel. Persons or vessels desiring to enter into or pass through
the zone must request permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. They may be contacted on VHF-FM radio channel 16 or
phone at 1-800-253-7465.
(2) Persons and vessels permitted to deviate from this safety zone
regulation and enter the restricted area must transit at the slowest
safe speed and comply with all lawful directions issued by the COTP or
a designated representative.
(d) Information broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public through Broadcast Notices to Mariners, Local
Notices to Mariners, and/or Safety Marine Information Broadcasts as
appropriate of the enforcement period for each safety zone as well as
any changes in the planned and published dates and times of
enforcement.
R.V. Timme,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2016-15572 Filed 6-29-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P