Revision of Land and Resource Management Plan for the Santa Fe National Forest; Counties of Los Alamos, Mora, Rio Arriba, Sandoval, San Miguel, Santa Fe, and Taos, New Mexico, 42641-42644 [2016-15525]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Notices
p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Name and Address of the Responsible
Official
The
National Forest Management Act
(NFMA) of 1976 requires that every
National Forest System (NFS) unit
develop a forest plan. On April 9, 2012,
the Forest Service finalized its land
management planning rule (2012
Planning Rule, 36 CFR 219), which
describes requirements for the planning
process and the content of the forest
plans. Forest plans describe the strategic
direction for management of forest
resources for ten to fifteen years, and are
adaptive and amendable as conditions
change over time. Under the 2012
Planning Rule, the assessment of
ecological, social, and economic
conditions and trends is the first stage
of the planning process (36 CFR 219.6).
The second stage, formal plan revision,
involves the development of our forest
plan in conjunction with the
preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement under the NEPA. The third
stage of the process is monitoring and
feedback, which is ongoing over the life
of the revised forest plans.
The Santa Fe National Forest has
completed its assessment pursuant to
2012 Forest Planning Rule. The
assessment was developed with public
participation and includes an evaluation
of existing information about relevant
ecological, economic, cultural and
social conditions, trends, and
sustainability and their relationship to
forest plans within the context of the
broader landscape. The intent of the
Santa Fe National Forest is that this
information builds a common
understanding prior to entering formal
plan revision. With this notice, the
Santa Fe National Forest is initiating
formal plan revision and invites other
governments, non-governmental parties,
and the public to contribute. The intent
of public engagement is to inform
development of the plan revision. We
encourage contributors to share material
that may be relevant to the planning
process, including desired conditions
for the Santa Fe National Forest. As we
develop public engagement
opportunities to assist with the plan
revision phase, public announcements
will be made and information will be
posted on the Forest’s Web site:
www.fs.usda.gov/goto/
santafeforestplan. If you would like to
contribute to the process or for more
information, please call 505–438–5442,
email santafeforestplan@fs.fed.us, or
contact Jennifer Cramer, Forest Planner,
Santa Fe National Forest, 505–438–
5449.
The Responsible Official for the
revision of the forest plan for the Santa
Fe National Forest is Maria T. Garcia,
Forest Supervisor, Santa Fe National
Forest, 11 Forest Lane, Santa Fe, New
Mexico 87508.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Revision of Land and Resource
Management Plan for the Santa Fe
National Forest; Counties of Los
Alamos, Mora, Rio Arriba, Sandoval,
San Miguel, Santa Fe, and Taos, New
Mexico
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of Intent to revise the
Santa Fe National Forest Land and
Resource Management Plan and to
prepare an associated Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Forest Service is revising
the Land and Resource Management
Plan (hereafter referred to as the forest
plan) for the Santa Fe National Forest.
This notice describes the documents
(assessment report, summaries of public
meetings, preliminary needs-to-change
statements) currently available for
review and how to obtain them;
summarizes the needs to change to the
existing forest plan; provides
information concerning public
participation and engagement, including
the process for submitting comments;
provides an estimated schedule for the
planning process, including the time
available for comments, and includes
the names and addresses of agency
contacts who can provide additional
information.
DATES: Comments concerning the Needs
for Change and Proposed Action
provided in this notice will be most
useful in the development of the revised
forest plan and draft EIS if received by
August 5, 2016. The agency expects to
release a draft revised forest plan and
draft EIS by summer, 2017 and a final
revised forest plan and final EIS by fall,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Written correspondence can
be sent to: Santa Fe National Forest,
Attn: Forest Plan, 11 Forest Lane, Santa
Fe, NM 87508, or emailed to
santafeforestplan@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Cramer, Forest Planner, Santa
Fe National Forest, 11 Forest Lane,
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87508. More
information on our forest plan revision
process can be found on our Web site
at www.fs.usda.gov/goto/
santafeforestplan. If you have questions
or would like to sign-up for our mailing
list, you can email santafeforestplan@
fs.fed.us or call our Forest Plan Revision
number: 505–438–5442. Individuals
who use telecommunication devices for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 8
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
42641
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Nature of the Decision To Be Made
The Santa Fe National Forest is
proposing to revise the existing forest
plan and is preparing an EIS to inform
the Forest Supervisor so she can decide
which alternative best maintains and
restores National Forest System
terrestrial and aquatic resources while
providing ecosystem services and
multiple uses, as required by the
National Forest Management Act and
the Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act.
The revised forest plan will describe
the strategic intent of managing the
Santa Fe National Forest for the next 10
to 15 years and will address the
identified needs for change to the
existing forest plan. The revised forest
plan will provide management direction
in the form of desired conditions,
objectives, standards, guidelines, and
suitability of lands. It will identify
delineation of new management areas
and potentially geographic areas across
the Forest; identify the timber sale
program quantity; make
recommendations to Congress for
Wilderness designation; and list rivers
and streams eligible for inclusion in the
National Wild and Scenic Rivers
System. The revised forest plan will also
provide a description of the plan area’s
distinctive roles and contributions
within the broader landscape, identify
watersheds that are a priority for
maintenance or restoration, include a
monitoring program, and contain
information reflecting expected possible
actions over the life of the forest plan.
The revised forest plan will represent
decisions that are strategic in nature, but
will not make site-specific project
decisions and will not dictate day-today administrative activities needed to
carry on the Forest Service’s internal
operations. The authorization of project
level activities will be based on the
guidance/direction contained in the
revised forest plan, but will occur
through subsequent project specific
NEPA analysis and decision-making.
The revised forest plan will provide
broad, strategic guidance that is
consistent with other laws and
regulations. Though strategic guidance
will be provided, no decisions will be
made regarding the management of
individual roads or trails, such as those
might be associated with a Travel
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
42642
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Management plan under 36 CFR part
212. Some issues (e.g., hunting
regulations), although important, are
beyond the authority or control of the
National Forest System and will not be
considered. No decision regarding oil
and gas leasing availability will be
made, though plan components may be
brought forward or developed that will
help guide the development of oil & gas
leasing decisions that might be
necessary in the future.
Purpose and Need (Needs for Change)
and Proposed Action
According to the National Forest
Management Act, forest plans are to be
revised every 10 to 15 years. The
proposed action is to revise the forest
plan to address the identified needs for
change to the existing forest plan.
Alternatives to the proposed action will
be developed to address significant
issues identified through scoping.
The purpose and need for revising the
current forest plan are to: (1) Update the
forest plan which was approved in 1987
and is over 29 years old, (2) reflect
changes in economic, social, and
ecological conditions, new policies and
priorities, and new information based
on monitoring and scientific research,
and (3) address the preliminary
identified needs for change to the
existing forest plan, which are
summarized below. Extensive public
and interdisciplinary team involvement,
along with science-based evaluations,
have helped to identify these
preliminary needs for change to the
existing forest plan.
What follows is a summary of the
preliminary identified needs for change
to the existing forest plan. A more fully
developed description of the
preliminary needs for change, which
has been organized into several resource
and management topic sections, is
available for review on the plan revision
Web site at: www.fs.usda.gov/goto/
santafeforestplan.
The Santa Fe National Forest has
identified twelve focus areas, the first
topics presented below, that have the
greatest needs for new or different plan
direction. Needs for change for
additional resources follow and
represent additional cases where
changes are needed in plan direction.
Overall, there is a need for plan
direction that is strategic and identifies
desired conditions with objectives for
how resources should be managed;
eliminates redundancies with existing
laws, regulations and policy; removes
requirements to prepare additional
resource plans; and that incorporates
the best available scientific information
(BASI) into all plan components.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
Monitoring. Monitoring is a critical
element of adaptive management, and
the plan monitoring program needs to
be focused to be effective. Monitoring
questions that are relevant to plan
components including desired
conditions, standards, guidelines,
suitability and other strategic goals of
the revised forest plan are needed. In
addition, monitoring at appropriate
scales is needed, including monitoring
beyond the Santa Fe National Forest
boundary to compare resources on the
forest with their status on a larger
context scale or even between
neighboring forests.
Relationships & Partners.
Relationships and effective partnerships
are key to the successful
implementation of the forest plan that
will protect the land and serve the
people. Management approaches are
needed to both streamline the processes
that leverage partners and volunteers
and build stronger relationships with
the public, including but not limited to
state and federal agencies, cities and
counties, tribal governments,
recreational and forest user groups,
environmental groups, land grant
communities and other traditional
communities, local communities, youth,
and vendors. Management approaches
are also needed that will emphasize
public education regarding the Santa Fe
National Forest’s diverse ecological,
social, and economic resources, the
multiple-use philosophy, public laws
and regulations, and management
strategies.
Frequent Fire (Low Severity) Systems.
Fire exclusion and past management
activities have limited frequent, lowseverity wildfires on the landscape.
Wildfire atypical of historic fire regimes
has resulted from higher densities of
trees, increased fuel loadings, and
altered species composition from
mature, fire-tolerant species toward
shade-tolerant, less fire-resistant
species. There is a need for plan
direction that recognizes the natural
processes of fire and its use as a
management tool for vegetation types on
the Santa Fe National Forest and that
supports integrated resource objectives.
Grass Cover. Grassland, woodland
and shrubland have significantly less
grass cover and productivity as a result
of legacy (historical) grazing from
livestock, wildlife grazing, roads, and
the exclusion of wildfire. This lack of
cover contributes to reduced water
infiltration, accelerated erosion and
declining soil productivity, especially
during periods of drought and
contributes to a cycle that continues to
reduce vegetative cover. In addition,
native grasses on much of the landscape
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
have been replaced with non-native
and/or invasive species and are not as
effective in the prevention of erosion or
as productive for forage. There is a need
for desired conditions and standards
and guidelines that allow for the
restoration, conservation, and
maintenance of grass productivity and
diversity, emphasizing native grasses.
Desired conditions that limit and
reverse woody species encroachment
into grasslands and infill of shrublands,
woodlands, and forested systems are
also needed.
Riparian Ecosystems. Riparian
systems have been degraded and are at
risk across the forest. A variety of land
uses (e.g., roads, grazing, recreation),
increased water demand (water
withdrawal) and climatic changes (e.g.,
long-term drought) have deteriorated
these systems. There is a need for
desired conditions to restore or
maintain characteristic composition and
cover of riparian vegetation. There is a
need for standards and guidelines that
minimize the ecological impacts of
multiple uses in riparian areas, and a
recognition of their reliance on upland
ecological health.
Restoration of Ecosystem Resiliency.
Resiliency is the ability of an ecosystem
to regain structure, composition, and
function following disturbance on a
time span that is consistent with the
dynamics of the ecosystem. There is a
need for plan direction that recognizes
the interdependence of resources,
provides for management areas that
reflect natural features and/or ecological
boundaries, incorporates adaptive
management components to better
respond to changing environmental
conditions, and support an all-lands
approach of working with neighboring
land managers to implement projects
that improve landscape connectivity
across mixed ownerships where natural
systems span multiple administrative
boundaries. In addition, desired
conditions are needed that promote
natural disturbance processes that
sustain forest carbon sequestration and
emphasize silvicultural practices of
uneven-aged management, and
standards and guidelines that limit nonnative species while encouraging native
species.
Water. Both natural and humancaused disturbances have degraded
water quality and quantity. As
population around the Santa Fe
National Forest increases, the lack of
surface water will place a greater
demand on groundwater resources
which may further deplete surface flows
both on and off the forest. There is a
need for plan direction to protect stream
channels, hydrological function and
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Notices
condition of water-dependent systems
by maintaining and restoring upland
and riparian vegetative cover and
reducing erosion and sedimentation
from disturbed sites (e.g., reclaiming
roads) where feasible. There is also a
need for plan direction which provides
for sustainable groundwater-dependent
ecosystems (e.g., seeps and springs,
fens, and wetlands) and for the longterm protection of groundwater quality
and quantity on the Santa Fe National
Forest. There is a need for plan
direction that considers consumptive
water uses and water rights because
water is over allocated and will
continue to be in high demand.
Soils. Soil condition, and soil erosion
hazard are directly linked to site
productivity and soil resilience, and
current soil loss rates exceed natural
soil loss rates across the Santa Fe
National Forest. The majority of the
Santa Fe National Forest has a high
probability for accelerated erosion due
to natural disturbances or management
disturbances that expose the soil surface
without incorporating erosion control
measures. There is a need for plan
direction that promotes the maintenance
and restoration of soil condition and
function (e.g., hydrology, stability, and
nutrient cycling) by limiting the amount
of exposed soil and by restoring and
maintaining sufficient vegetative cover.
Range. Vegetation analyses show that
the grassland types commonly used for
livestock grazing are losing productivity
due to declines in herbaceous ground
cover, invasive species and drought.
Other key influences include fractured
ownership of private lands, legal
uncertainties about land titles, and
endangered species listings by the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, including the
New Mexico Meadow Jumping Mouse.
There is a need for plan direction that
provides opportunities to use adaptive
management for the range program that
incorporates ecosystem-based desired
conditions, with particular emphasis on
strategies to address drought and other
extreme weather-related events.
Recreation. The ability of the Santa Fe
National Forest to provide a meaningful
recreation program is at risk, reflecting
increasing and changing demands in a
resource-constrained management
environment. There is a need for plan
direction on sustainable recreation
management to provide high quality
recreational experiences that are
consistent with the Santa Fe National
Forest’s social, environmental, and
economical resource capacity while
balancing changing trends in services
and intended use of recreation
infrastructure and facilities. Plan
direction is also needed to help manage
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
recreation activity impacts to areas
sensitive to resource degradation or at
risk due to high visitation and to reduce
user conflicts.
Infrastructure. The Santa Fe National
Forest’s ability to maintain its current
infrastructure is severely threatened. Of
the approximately 6,900 miles of roads
on the landscape, 2,200 miles of roads
are open to the public for motorized use.
The remaining 4,700 miles of roads may
be administrative use roads or nonsystem roads, and most contribute to
erosion and sedimentation, reflecting a
critical and growing gap in resources for
maintenance. There is also
infrastructure related to rural and
agronomic uses, such as timber
harvesting, grazing, and rangeland
management. Much of the range
infrastructure across the forest is nonfunctional and/or in need of
maintenance or decommissioning. Nonfunctional water developments and
downed fencing result in cattle seeking
water in sensitive riparian areas.
Unmaintained and vandalized range
improvements can also be hazardous for
wildlife. There is a need for plan
direction to ensure sustainable
infrastructure (e.g., roads, recreation and
administrative facilities, range
improvements, maintenance, etc.) and
standards and guidelines that address
negative impacts of existing roads.
Land Status and Ownership. The
Lands Program on the Santa Fe National
Forest has increasing demands for
services such as managing access to
private inholdings, managing
encroachments from private land onto
Forest Service land, title claims,
evolving requests for communication
sites, the ever-growing Wildland Urban
Interface area, completing property
boundary surveys, and fragmentation.
There is a need for plan direction
regarding access to private lands,
including during evaluation of
placement of infrastructure, to minimize
natural resource damage while ensuring
rights of access to private lands are
respected. Due to growing demand, plan
direction regarding sites for
communications infrastructure is
needed. Plan direction is also needed to
protect existing public access rights and
provide for new recreational access
opportunities to National Forest lands.
Management approaches that support
coordination between local governments
and the Forest Service regarding
permits, leases, and easements on
National Forest lands are needed.
Wildlife, Fish, and Plants. There is a
need for plan direction that supports
restoration and maintenance of
ecological conditions that contribute to
the recovery and conservation of
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42643
federally listed species (threatened and
endangered), maintaining viable
populations of the species of
conservation concern, and maintaining
common and abundant species. In
addition, plan direction for terrestrial
and aquatic habitat connectivity for
species migration and movement is
needed.
Air. There is a need for plan direction
for air quality in terms of ambient air
quality, visibility, and critical loads.
Socioeconomic Resources. There is a
need for plan direction that recognizes
the Santa Fe National Forest’s role in
contributing to traditional and cultural
forest uses and local economies,
including service-based sectors such as
recreation and tourism, timber, and
other multiple-use related activities and
products.
Designated Areas. There is a need for
plan direction to identify and evaluate
potential additions to the National
Wilderness Preservation System and
eligibility for inclusion in the National
Wild and Scenic Rivers System. In
addition, plan direction for designated
and recommended wilderness areas is
needed to protect and enhance
wilderness values and character.
Scenery. There is a need for plan
direction to integrate scenery
management into all resource
management decisions with the intent
of retaining and enhancing scenic
resources while integrating with other
resources (e.g., restoration, habitat
diversity, and timber management).
Cultural Resources. There is a need
for plan direction to stabilize, preserve,
interpret, and protect historic and
sensitive properties, (e.g., archaeological
sites, historic structures, and traditional
cultural properties). There is also a need
for plan direction that recognizes the
inherent value and preservation of
Native American traditional cultural
properties and sacred sites, as well as
non-Native American traditional
cultural properties, while maintaining
the anonymity of such sites where
appropriate.
Traditional and Cultural Ways of Life.
There are deep and historic ties between
nearby populations and the Santa Fe
National Forest, and the revised plan
needs to recognize and protect historic
and contemporary cultural uses—both
economic and non-economic—for tribes
as well as traditional communities not
considered under tribal relations (e.g.
traditional Hispanic and Anglo
communities).
Areas of Tribal Importance. There is
a need for management approaches that
include opportunities for integrating
forest management with tribal needs
through shared stewardship to address
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
42644
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
threats to adjacent tribal resources (e.g.,
through the Tribal Forest Protection Act
of 2004), to meet common objectives
identified in tribal and pueblo land
management plans, and to utilize an ‘‘all
lands’’ approach to resources
management.
Extractive multiple uses. There is a
need for plan direction that provides for
the use of a variety of forest products by
commercial, noncommercial, tribal, and
land grant users. There is a need for
plan direction that allows for flexible
size criteria regarding timber extraction
to balance desired conditions and the
ability to provide economically viable
forest products. There is a need for plan
direction regarding traditional and
alternative energy sources that balances
demand with natural resource impacts.
Public Involvement
A Notice of initiating the assessment
phase of forest plan revision for the
Santa Fe National Forest was published
in the Federal Register on March 6,
2014 (79 FR 12686). Prior to the formal
initiation of the assessment, the Santa
Fe National Forest held 27 joint
listening sessions with the Carson
National Forest and two workshops to
solicit comments, input, and desires
from the public, governmental entities,
tribes, land grants, and
nongovernmental organization for
public participation through the forest
plan revision process. In April and May
2014, fourteen public meetings provided
an introduction to forest plan revision
and an opportunity for the public to
provide input for the assessment by
expressing how they use and value the
forest, and what trends or changes they
have observed. This information was
directly incorporated into the
assessment report for the Santa Fe
National Forest ‘‘Input Received from
Public Meetings’’. In April and May
2015, the Santa Fe and Carson National
Forests jointly held three meetings with
members of local land grants, to present
and discuss the plan revision process. In
October 2015, the forest held a
symposium to present detailed findings
from the assessment followed by ten
public and two tribal work sessions on
developing Need for Change statements.
Additionally, the Santa Fe National
Forest has been informing and engaging
communities at a local level through
presentation at meetings hosted by
organizations, government groups and
Tribes; informational booths at fairs and
local community events; and
presentations and field trips for local
schools.
Any comments related to the Santa Fe
National Forest’s assessment report that
are received following the publication of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
this Notice may be considered in the
draft and final environmental impact
statements.
during the opportunities provided for
public comment during the planning
process.
Scoping Process
Written comments received in
response to this notice will be analyzed
to complete the identification of the
needs for change to the existing forest
plan, further develop the proposed
action, and identify potential significant
issues. Significant issues will, in turn,
form the basis for developing
alternatives to the proposed action.
Comments on the preliminary needs for
change and proposed action will be
most valuable if received by August 17,
2016, and should clearly articulate the
reviewer’s opinions and concerns.
Comments received in response to this
notice, including the names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record. Comments
submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered in the NEPA
process; however, anonymous
comments will not provide the Agency
with the ability to provide the
respondent with subsequent
environmental documents. See the
below objection process material,
particularly the requirements for filing
an objection, for how anonymous
comments are handled during the
objection process. Refer to the Forest’s
Web site (www.fs.usda.gov/goto/
santafeforestplan) for information on
when public meetings will be scheduled
for refining the proposed action and
identifying possible alternatives to the
proposed action.
Documents Available for Review
The Needs for Change documentation,
the Assessment Report, summaries of
the public meetings and public meeting
materials, and public comments and
responses are posted on the Forest’s
Web site at: www.fs.usda.gov/goto/
santafeforestplan. As necessary or
appropriate, the material available on
this site will be further adjusted as part
of the planning process using the
provisions of the 2012 planning rule.
Applicable Planning Rule
Preparation of the revised forest plan
for the Santa Fe National Forest began
with the publication of a Notice of
Assessment Initiation in the Federal
Register on March 6, 2014 (79 FR
12686) and was initiated under the
planning procedures contained in the
2012 Forest Service planning rule (36
CFR 219 (2012)).
Permits or Licenses Required To
Implement the Proposed Action
No permits or licenses are needed for
the development or revision of a forest
plan.
Decisions Will Be Subject To Objection
The decision to approve the revised
forest plan for the Santa Fe National
Forest will be subject to the objection
process identified in 36 CFR part 219
Subpart B (219.50 to 219.62). According
to 36 CFR 219.53(a), those who may file
an objection are individuals and entities
who have submitted substantive formal
comments related to forest plan revision
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1600–1614; 36 CFR
part 219 [77 FR 21260–21273].
Dated: June 23, 2016.
Joseph S. Norrell,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2016–15525 Filed 6–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Information Collection; Appeal of
Decisions Relating to Occupancy or
Use of National Forest System Lands
and Resources
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice; requests for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Forest Service is seeking comments on
the renewal of a currently approved
information collection.
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing by August 29, 2016 to be
considered.
SUMMARY:
Comments concerning this
notice should be addressed to USDA
Forest Service, Deb Beighley, Assistant
Director, Appeals and Litigation,
Ecosystem Management Coordination
staff, 202–205–1277 or by email to
dbeighley@fs.fed.us.
The public may inspect comments
received at the Office of Ecosystem
Management Coordination, Appeals &
Litigation USDA Forest Service, 201
14th Street SW., Mail Stop 1104,
Washington, DC 20024–1101, during
normal business hours. Visitors are
encouraged to call ahead at 202–791–
8488 to facilitate entry into the building.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deb
Beighley, Assistant Director, Appeals
and Litigation, Ecosystem Management
Coordination staff, 202–205–1277.
Individuals who use telecommunication
devices for the deaf may call the Federal
Relay Service at 800 877–8339 twenty
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\30JNN1.SGM
30JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 126 (Thursday, June 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42641-42644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15525]
[[Page 42641]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Revision of Land and Resource Management Plan for the Santa Fe
National Forest; Counties of Los Alamos, Mora, Rio Arriba, Sandoval,
San Miguel, Santa Fe, and Taos, New Mexico
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Intent to revise the Santa Fe National Forest Land
and Resource Management Plan and to prepare an associated Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Forest Service is revising the Land and Resource
Management Plan (hereafter referred to as the forest plan) for the
Santa Fe National Forest. This notice describes the documents
(assessment report, summaries of public meetings, preliminary needs-to-
change statements) currently available for review and how to obtain
them; summarizes the needs to change to the existing forest plan;
provides information concerning public participation and engagement,
including the process for submitting comments; provides an estimated
schedule for the planning process, including the time available for
comments, and includes the names and addresses of agency contacts who
can provide additional information.
DATES: Comments concerning the Needs for Change and Proposed Action
provided in this notice will be most useful in the development of the
revised forest plan and draft EIS if received by August 5, 2016. The
agency expects to release a draft revised forest plan and draft EIS by
summer, 2017 and a final revised forest plan and final EIS by fall,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Written correspondence can be sent to: Santa Fe National
Forest, Attn: Forest Plan, 11 Forest Lane, Santa Fe, NM 87508, or
emailed to santafeforestplan@fs.fed.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Cramer, Forest Planner, Santa
Fe National Forest, 11 Forest Lane, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87508. More
information on our forest plan revision process can be found on our Web
site at www.fs.usda.gov/goto/santafeforestplan. If you have questions
or would like to sign-up for our mailing list, you can email
santafeforestplan@fs.fed.us or call our Forest Plan Revision number:
505-438-5442. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-
800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The National Forest Management Act (NFMA) of
1976 requires that every National Forest System (NFS) unit develop a
forest plan. On April 9, 2012, the Forest Service finalized its land
management planning rule (2012 Planning Rule, 36 CFR 219), which
describes requirements for the planning process and the content of the
forest plans. Forest plans describe the strategic direction for
management of forest resources for ten to fifteen years, and are
adaptive and amendable as conditions change over time. Under the 2012
Planning Rule, the assessment of ecological, social, and economic
conditions and trends is the first stage of the planning process (36
CFR 219.6). The second stage, formal plan revision, involves the
development of our forest plan in conjunction with the preparation of
an Environmental Impact Statement under the NEPA. The third stage of
the process is monitoring and feedback, which is ongoing over the life
of the revised forest plans.
The Santa Fe National Forest has completed its assessment pursuant
to 2012 Forest Planning Rule. The assessment was developed with public
participation and includes an evaluation of existing information about
relevant ecological, economic, cultural and social conditions, trends,
and sustainability and their relationship to forest plans within the
context of the broader landscape. The intent of the Santa Fe National
Forest is that this information builds a common understanding prior to
entering formal plan revision. With this notice, the Santa Fe National
Forest is initiating formal plan revision and invites other
governments, non-governmental parties, and the public to contribute.
The intent of public engagement is to inform development of the plan
revision. We encourage contributors to share material that may be
relevant to the planning process, including desired conditions for the
Santa Fe National Forest. As we develop public engagement opportunities
to assist with the plan revision phase, public announcements will be
made and information will be posted on the Forest's Web site:
www.fs.usda.gov/goto/santafeforestplan. If you would like to contribute
to the process or for more information, please call 505-438-5442, email
santafeforestplan@fs.fed.us, or contact Jennifer Cramer, Forest
Planner, Santa Fe National Forest, 505-438-5449.
Name and Address of the Responsible Official
The Responsible Official for the revision of the forest plan for
the Santa Fe National Forest is Maria T. Garcia, Forest Supervisor,
Santa Fe National Forest, 11 Forest Lane, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87508.
Nature of the Decision To Be Made
The Santa Fe National Forest is proposing to revise the existing
forest plan and is preparing an EIS to inform the Forest Supervisor so
she can decide which alternative best maintains and restores National
Forest System terrestrial and aquatic resources while providing
ecosystem services and multiple uses, as required by the National
Forest Management Act and the Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act.
The revised forest plan will describe the strategic intent of
managing the Santa Fe National Forest for the next 10 to 15 years and
will address the identified needs for change to the existing forest
plan. The revised forest plan will provide management direction in the
form of desired conditions, objectives, standards, guidelines, and
suitability of lands. It will identify delineation of new management
areas and potentially geographic areas across the Forest; identify the
timber sale program quantity; make recommendations to Congress for
Wilderness designation; and list rivers and streams eligible for
inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The revised
forest plan will also provide a description of the plan area's
distinctive roles and contributions within the broader landscape,
identify watersheds that are a priority for maintenance or restoration,
include a monitoring program, and contain information reflecting
expected possible actions over the life of the forest plan.
The revised forest plan will represent decisions that are strategic
in nature, but will not make site-specific project decisions and will
not dictate day-to-day administrative activities needed to carry on the
Forest Service's internal operations. The authorization of project
level activities will be based on the guidance/direction contained in
the revised forest plan, but will occur through subsequent project
specific NEPA analysis and decision-making.
The revised forest plan will provide broad, strategic guidance that
is consistent with other laws and regulations. Though strategic
guidance will be provided, no decisions will be made regarding the
management of individual roads or trails, such as those might be
associated with a Travel
[[Page 42642]]
Management plan under 36 CFR part 212. Some issues (e.g., hunting
regulations), although important, are beyond the authority or control
of the National Forest System and will not be considered. No decision
regarding oil and gas leasing availability will be made, though plan
components may be brought forward or developed that will help guide the
development of oil & gas leasing decisions that might be necessary in
the future.
Purpose and Need (Needs for Change) and Proposed Action
According to the National Forest Management Act, forest plans are
to be revised every 10 to 15 years. The proposed action is to revise
the forest plan to address the identified needs for change to the
existing forest plan. Alternatives to the proposed action will be
developed to address significant issues identified through scoping.
The purpose and need for revising the current forest plan are to:
(1) Update the forest plan which was approved in 1987 and is over 29
years old, (2) reflect changes in economic, social, and ecological
conditions, new policies and priorities, and new information based on
monitoring and scientific research, and (3) address the preliminary
identified needs for change to the existing forest plan, which are
summarized below. Extensive public and interdisciplinary team
involvement, along with science-based evaluations, have helped to
identify these preliminary needs for change to the existing forest
plan.
What follows is a summary of the preliminary identified needs for
change to the existing forest plan. A more fully developed description
of the preliminary needs for change, which has been organized into
several resource and management topic sections, is available for review
on the plan revision Web site at: www.fs.usda.gov/goto/santafeforestplan.
The Santa Fe National Forest has identified twelve focus areas, the
first topics presented below, that have the greatest needs for new or
different plan direction. Needs for change for additional resources
follow and represent additional cases where changes are needed in plan
direction. Overall, there is a need for plan direction that is
strategic and identifies desired conditions with objectives for how
resources should be managed; eliminates redundancies with existing
laws, regulations and policy; removes requirements to prepare
additional resource plans; and that incorporates the best available
scientific information (BASI) into all plan components.
Monitoring. Monitoring is a critical element of adaptive
management, and the plan monitoring program needs to be focused to be
effective. Monitoring questions that are relevant to plan components
including desired conditions, standards, guidelines, suitability and
other strategic goals of the revised forest plan are needed. In
addition, monitoring at appropriate scales is needed, including
monitoring beyond the Santa Fe National Forest boundary to compare
resources on the forest with their status on a larger context scale or
even between neighboring forests.
Relationships & Partners. Relationships and effective partnerships
are key to the successful implementation of the forest plan that will
protect the land and serve the people. Management approaches are needed
to both streamline the processes that leverage partners and volunteers
and build stronger relationships with the public, including but not
limited to state and federal agencies, cities and counties, tribal
governments, recreational and forest user groups, environmental groups,
land grant communities and other traditional communities, local
communities, youth, and vendors. Management approaches are also needed
that will emphasize public education regarding the Santa Fe National
Forest's diverse ecological, social, and economic resources, the
multiple-use philosophy, public laws and regulations, and management
strategies.
Frequent Fire (Low Severity) Systems. Fire exclusion and past
management activities have limited frequent, low-severity wildfires on
the landscape. Wildfire atypical of historic fire regimes has resulted
from higher densities of trees, increased fuel loadings, and altered
species composition from mature, fire-tolerant species toward shade-
tolerant, less fire-resistant species. There is a need for plan
direction that recognizes the natural processes of fire and its use as
a management tool for vegetation types on the Santa Fe National Forest
and that supports integrated resource objectives.
Grass Cover. Grassland, woodland and shrubland have significantly
less grass cover and productivity as a result of legacy (historical)
grazing from livestock, wildlife grazing, roads, and the exclusion of
wildfire. This lack of cover contributes to reduced water infiltration,
accelerated erosion and declining soil productivity, especially during
periods of drought and contributes to a cycle that continues to reduce
vegetative cover. In addition, native grasses on much of the landscape
have been replaced with non-native and/or invasive species and are not
as effective in the prevention of erosion or as productive for forage.
There is a need for desired conditions and standards and guidelines
that allow for the restoration, conservation, and maintenance of grass
productivity and diversity, emphasizing native grasses. Desired
conditions that limit and reverse woody species encroachment into
grasslands and infill of shrublands, woodlands, and forested systems
are also needed.
Riparian Ecosystems. Riparian systems have been degraded and are at
risk across the forest. A variety of land uses (e.g., roads, grazing,
recreation), increased water demand (water withdrawal) and climatic
changes (e.g., long-term drought) have deteriorated these systems.
There is a need for desired conditions to restore or maintain
characteristic composition and cover of riparian vegetation. There is a
need for standards and guidelines that minimize the ecological impacts
of multiple uses in riparian areas, and a recognition of their reliance
on upland ecological health.
Restoration of Ecosystem Resiliency. Resiliency is the ability of
an ecosystem to regain structure, composition, and function following
disturbance on a time span that is consistent with the dynamics of the
ecosystem. There is a need for plan direction that recognizes the
interdependence of resources, provides for management areas that
reflect natural features and/or ecological boundaries, incorporates
adaptive management components to better respond to changing
environmental conditions, and support an all-lands approach of working
with neighboring land managers to implement projects that improve
landscape connectivity across mixed ownerships where natural systems
span multiple administrative boundaries. In addition, desired
conditions are needed that promote natural disturbance processes that
sustain forest carbon sequestration and emphasize silvicultural
practices of uneven-aged management, and standards and guidelines that
limit non-native species while encouraging native species.
Water. Both natural and human-caused disturbances have degraded
water quality and quantity. As population around the Santa Fe National
Forest increases, the lack of surface water will place a greater demand
on groundwater resources which may further deplete surface flows both
on and off the forest. There is a need for plan direction to protect
stream channels, hydrological function and
[[Page 42643]]
condition of water-dependent systems by maintaining and restoring
upland and riparian vegetative cover and reducing erosion and
sedimentation from disturbed sites (e.g., reclaiming roads) where
feasible. There is also a need for plan direction which provides for
sustainable groundwater-dependent ecosystems (e.g., seeps and springs,
fens, and wetlands) and for the long-term protection of groundwater
quality and quantity on the Santa Fe National Forest. There is a need
for plan direction that considers consumptive water uses and water
rights because water is over allocated and will continue to be in high
demand.
Soils. Soil condition, and soil erosion hazard are directly linked
to site productivity and soil resilience, and current soil loss rates
exceed natural soil loss rates across the Santa Fe National Forest. The
majority of the Santa Fe National Forest has a high probability for
accelerated erosion due to natural disturbances or management
disturbances that expose the soil surface without incorporating erosion
control measures. There is a need for plan direction that promotes the
maintenance and restoration of soil condition and function (e.g.,
hydrology, stability, and nutrient cycling) by limiting the amount of
exposed soil and by restoring and maintaining sufficient vegetative
cover.
Range. Vegetation analyses show that the grassland types commonly
used for livestock grazing are losing productivity due to declines in
herbaceous ground cover, invasive species and drought. Other key
influences include fractured ownership of private lands, legal
uncertainties about land titles, and endangered species listings by the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, including the New Mexico Meadow Jumping
Mouse. There is a need for plan direction that provides opportunities
to use adaptive management for the range program that incorporates
ecosystem-based desired conditions, with particular emphasis on
strategies to address drought and other extreme weather-related events.
Recreation. The ability of the Santa Fe National Forest to provide
a meaningful recreation program is at risk, reflecting increasing and
changing demands in a resource-constrained management environment.
There is a need for plan direction on sustainable recreation management
to provide high quality recreational experiences that are consistent
with the Santa Fe National Forest's social, environmental, and
economical resource capacity while balancing changing trends in
services and intended use of recreation infrastructure and facilities.
Plan direction is also needed to help manage recreation activity
impacts to areas sensitive to resource degradation or at risk due to
high visitation and to reduce user conflicts.
Infrastructure. The Santa Fe National Forest's ability to maintain
its current infrastructure is severely threatened. Of the approximately
6,900 miles of roads on the landscape, 2,200 miles of roads are open to
the public for motorized use. The remaining 4,700 miles of roads may be
administrative use roads or non-system roads, and most contribute to
erosion and sedimentation, reflecting a critical and growing gap in
resources for maintenance. There is also infrastructure related to
rural and agronomic uses, such as timber harvesting, grazing, and
rangeland management. Much of the range infrastructure across the
forest is non-functional and/or in need of maintenance or
decommissioning. Non-functional water developments and downed fencing
result in cattle seeking water in sensitive riparian areas.
Unmaintained and vandalized range improvements can also be hazardous
for wildlife. There is a need for plan direction to ensure sustainable
infrastructure (e.g., roads, recreation and administrative facilities,
range improvements, maintenance, etc.) and standards and guidelines
that address negative impacts of existing roads.
Land Status and Ownership. The Lands Program on the Santa Fe
National Forest has increasing demands for services such as managing
access to private inholdings, managing encroachments from private land
onto Forest Service land, title claims, evolving requests for
communication sites, the ever-growing Wildland Urban Interface area,
completing property boundary surveys, and fragmentation. There is a
need for plan direction regarding access to private lands, including
during evaluation of placement of infrastructure, to minimize natural
resource damage while ensuring rights of access to private lands are
respected. Due to growing demand, plan direction regarding sites for
communications infrastructure is needed. Plan direction is also needed
to protect existing public access rights and provide for new
recreational access opportunities to National Forest lands. Management
approaches that support coordination between local governments and the
Forest Service regarding permits, leases, and easements on National
Forest lands are needed.
Wildlife, Fish, and Plants. There is a need for plan direction that
supports restoration and maintenance of ecological conditions that
contribute to the recovery and conservation of federally listed species
(threatened and endangered), maintaining viable populations of the
species of conservation concern, and maintaining common and abundant
species. In addition, plan direction for terrestrial and aquatic
habitat connectivity for species migration and movement is needed.
Air. There is a need for plan direction for air quality in terms of
ambient air quality, visibility, and critical loads.
Socioeconomic Resources. There is a need for plan direction that
recognizes the Santa Fe National Forest's role in contributing to
traditional and cultural forest uses and local economies, including
service-based sectors such as recreation and tourism, timber, and other
multiple-use related activities and products.
Designated Areas. There is a need for plan direction to identify
and evaluate potential additions to the National Wilderness
Preservation System and eligibility for inclusion in the National Wild
and Scenic Rivers System. In addition, plan direction for designated
and recommended wilderness areas is needed to protect and enhance
wilderness values and character.
Scenery. There is a need for plan direction to integrate scenery
management into all resource management decisions with the intent of
retaining and enhancing scenic resources while integrating with other
resources (e.g., restoration, habitat diversity, and timber
management).
Cultural Resources. There is a need for plan direction to
stabilize, preserve, interpret, and protect historic and sensitive
properties, (e.g., archaeological sites, historic structures, and
traditional cultural properties). There is also a need for plan
direction that recognizes the inherent value and preservation of Native
American traditional cultural properties and sacred sites, as well as
non-Native American traditional cultural properties, while maintaining
the anonymity of such sites where appropriate.
Traditional and Cultural Ways of Life. There are deep and historic
ties between nearby populations and the Santa Fe National Forest, and
the revised plan needs to recognize and protect historic and
contemporary cultural uses--both economic and non-economic--for tribes
as well as traditional communities not considered under tribal
relations (e.g. traditional Hispanic and Anglo communities).
Areas of Tribal Importance. There is a need for management
approaches that include opportunities for integrating forest management
with tribal needs through shared stewardship to address
[[Page 42644]]
threats to adjacent tribal resources (e.g., through the Tribal Forest
Protection Act of 2004), to meet common objectives identified in tribal
and pueblo land management plans, and to utilize an ``all lands''
approach to resources management.
Extractive multiple uses. There is a need for plan direction that
provides for the use of a variety of forest products by commercial,
noncommercial, tribal, and land grant users. There is a need for plan
direction that allows for flexible size criteria regarding timber
extraction to balance desired conditions and the ability to provide
economically viable forest products. There is a need for plan direction
regarding traditional and alternative energy sources that balances
demand with natural resource impacts.
Public Involvement
A Notice of initiating the assessment phase of forest plan revision
for the Santa Fe National Forest was published in the Federal Register
on March 6, 2014 (79 FR 12686). Prior to the formal initiation of the
assessment, the Santa Fe National Forest held 27 joint listening
sessions with the Carson National Forest and two workshops to solicit
comments, input, and desires from the public, governmental entities,
tribes, land grants, and nongovernmental organization for public
participation through the forest plan revision process. In April and
May 2014, fourteen public meetings provided an introduction to forest
plan revision and an opportunity for the public to provide input for
the assessment by expressing how they use and value the forest, and
what trends or changes they have observed. This information was
directly incorporated into the assessment report for the Santa Fe
National Forest ``Input Received from Public Meetings''. In April and
May 2015, the Santa Fe and Carson National Forests jointly held three
meetings with members of local land grants, to present and discuss the
plan revision process. In October 2015, the forest held a symposium to
present detailed findings from the assessment followed by ten public
and two tribal work sessions on developing Need for Change statements.
Additionally, the Santa Fe National Forest has been informing and
engaging communities at a local level through presentation at meetings
hosted by organizations, government groups and Tribes; informational
booths at fairs and local community events; and presentations and field
trips for local schools.
Any comments related to the Santa Fe National Forest's assessment
report that are received following the publication of this Notice may
be considered in the draft and final environmental impact statements.
Scoping Process
Written comments received in response to this notice will be
analyzed to complete the identification of the needs for change to the
existing forest plan, further develop the proposed action, and identify
potential significant issues. Significant issues will, in turn, form
the basis for developing alternatives to the proposed action. Comments
on the preliminary needs for change and proposed action will be most
valuable if received by August 17, 2016, and should clearly articulate
the reviewer's opinions and concerns. Comments received in response to
this notice, including the names and addresses of those who comment,
will be part of the public record. Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered in the NEPA process; however, anonymous
comments will not provide the Agency with the ability to provide the
respondent with subsequent environmental documents. See the below
objection process material, particularly the requirements for filing an
objection, for how anonymous comments are handled during the objection
process. Refer to the Forest's Web site (www.fs.usda.gov/goto/santafeforestplan) for information on when public meetings will be
scheduled for refining the proposed action and identifying possible
alternatives to the proposed action.
Applicable Planning Rule
Preparation of the revised forest plan for the Santa Fe National
Forest began with the publication of a Notice of Assessment Initiation
in the Federal Register on March 6, 2014 (79 FR 12686) and was
initiated under the planning procedures contained in the 2012 Forest
Service planning rule (36 CFR 219 (2012)).
Permits or Licenses Required To Implement the Proposed Action
No permits or licenses are needed for the development or revision
of a forest plan.
Decisions Will Be Subject To Objection
The decision to approve the revised forest plan for the Santa Fe
National Forest will be subject to the objection process identified in
36 CFR part 219 Subpart B (219.50 to 219.62). According to 36 CFR
219.53(a), those who may file an objection are individuals and entities
who have submitted substantive formal comments related to forest plan
revision during the opportunities provided for public comment during
the planning process.
Documents Available for Review
The Needs for Change documentation, the Assessment Report,
summaries of the public meetings and public meeting materials, and
public comments and responses are posted on the Forest's Web site at:
www.fs.usda.gov/goto/santafeforestplan. As necessary or appropriate,
the material available on this site will be further adjusted as part of
the planning process using the provisions of the 2012 planning rule.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1600-1614; 36 CFR part 219 [77 FR 21260-
21273].
Dated: June 23, 2016.
Joseph S. Norrell,
Deputy Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2016-15525 Filed 6-29-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P