Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Contract Financing (DFARS Case 2015-D026), 42607-42608 [2016-15246]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Proposed Rules
required under this section with other
reporting requirements, such as the title
V monitoring report required by 40 CFR
70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A), but at no point shall
the duration of a semiannual period
exceed six months.
(i) The owner/operator shall submit a
report that lists the monthly rolling 12month emission rates for NOX.
(ii) The owner/operator shall submit
excess emissions reports for NOX limits.
Excess emissions means emissions that
exceed the emissions limits specified in
paragraph (k)(3) of this section. The
reports shall include the magnitude,
date(s), and duration of each period of
excess emissions, specific identification
of each period of excess emissions that
occurs during startups, shutdowns, and
malfunctions of the unit, the nature and
cause of any malfunction (if known),
and the corrective action taken or
preventative measures adopted.
(iii) The owner/operator shall submit
CEMS performance reports, to include
dates and duration of each period
during which the CEMS was inoperative
(except for zero and span adjustments
and calibration checks), reason(s) why
the CEMS was inoperative and steps
taken to prevent recurrence, and any
CEMS repairs or adjustments.
(iv) The owner/operator shall also
submit results of any CEMS
performance tests specified by 40 CFR
part 60, Appendix F, Procedure 1
(Relative Accuracy Test Audits, Relative
Accuracy Audits, and Cylinder Gas
Audits).
(v) When no excess emissions have
occurred or the CEMS has not been
inoperative, repaired, or adjusted during
the reporting period, the owner/operator
shall state such information in the
reports required by paragraph (k)(9)(ii)
of this section.
(13) Notifications. (i) The owner/
operator shall submit notification of
commencement of construction of any
equipment which is being constructed
to comply with the NOX emission limits
in paragraph (k)(3) of this section.
(ii) The owner/operator shall submit
semiannual progress reports on
construction of any such equipment.
(iii) The owner/operator shall submit
notification of initial startup of any such
equipment.
(iv) By June 30, 2018, the owner/
operator of the Clarkdale Plant shall
notify EPA Region 9 by letter whether
it will comply with the emission limits
in paragraph (k)(3)(i) of this section or
whether it will comply with the
emission limits in paragraph (k)(4) of
this section. In the event that the owner/
operator does not submit timely and
proper notification by June 30, 2018, the
owner/operator of the Clarkdale Plant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
may not choose to comply with the
alternative emission limits in paragraph
(k)(4) of this section and shall comply
with the emission limits in paragraph
(k)(3)(i) of this section.
(14) Equipment operation. (i) At all
times, including periods of startup,
shutdown, and malfunction, the owner
or operator shall, to the extent
practicable, maintain and operate the
unit including associated air pollution
control equipment in a manner
consistent with good air pollution
control practices for minimizing
emissions. Pollution control equipment
shall be designed and capable of
operating properly to minimize
emissions during all expected operating
conditions. Determination of whether
acceptable operating and maintenance
procedures are being used will be based
on information available to the Regional
Administrator which may include, but
is not limited to, monitoring results,
review of operating and maintenance
procedures, and inspection of the unit.
(ii) After completion of installation of
ammonia injection on a unit, the owner
or operator shall inject sufficient
ammonia to achieve compliance with
NOX emission limits set forth in
paragraph (k)(3) of this section for that
unit while preventing excessive
ammonia emissions.
(15) Enforcement. Notwithstanding
any other provision in this
implementation plan, any credible
evidence or information relevant as to
whether the unit would have been in
compliance with applicable
requirements if the appropriate
performance or compliance test had
been performed, can be used to establish
whether or not the owner or operator
has violated or is in violation of any
standard or applicable emission limit in
the plan.
[FR Doc. 2016–15305 Filed 6–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 232
[Docket DARS–2016–0009]
RIN 0750–AI90
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Contract
Financing (DFARS Case 2015–D026)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42607
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS)
regarding the use of customary contact
financing, other than loan guarantees
and advance payments, on certain fixedprice contracts.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
August 29, 2016, to be considered in the
formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by DFARS Case 2015–D026,
using any of the following methods:
Æ Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
entering ‘‘DFARS Case 2015–D026’’
under the heading ‘‘Enter keyword or
ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the
link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘DFARS Case 2015–
D026.’’ Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘DFARS Case 2015–
D026’’ on your attached document.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2015–D026 in the subject
line of the message.
Æ Fax: 571–372–6094.
Æ Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Mark
Gomersall, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP/DARS,
Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301–3060.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Mark Gomersall, telephone 571–372–
6099.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS
regarding the use of customary contract
financing, other than loan guarantees
and advance payments identified in
FAR part 32, on fixed-price contracts
with a period of performance in excess
of one year that meet the dollar
thresholds established in FAR
32.104(d). DoD has determined that the
use of such customary contract
financing provides improved cash flow
as an incentive for commercial
companies to do business with DoD, is
in DoD’s best interest, and requires no
further justification of its use.
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
42608
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 126 / Thursday, June 30, 2016 / Proposed Rules
II. Discussion and Analysis
The proposed rule amends DFARS
232.104 to state that DoD has made the
determination that the use of customary
contract financing (see FAR 32.113),
other than loan guarantees and advance
payments, is in DoD’s best interest, and
further justification of its use is
unnecessary on fixed-price contracts
that meet the dollar thresholds
established in FAR 32.104(d), with a
period of performance in excess of a
year, and in solicitations expected to
result in such contracts.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.
804.
sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
However, an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis has been performed and is
summarized as follows:
DoD is proposing to amend the
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation
Supplement (DFARS) to state that DoD
has made the determination that the use
of customary contract financing (see
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
32.113), other than loan guarantees and
advance payments, is in DoD’s best
interest, and further justification of its
use is unnecessary on fixed-price
contracts that meet the dollar thresholds
established in FAR 32.104(d), with a
period of performance in excess of a
year, and in solicitations expected to
result in such contracts.
The objective of the proposed rule is
to clarify that the use of certain
customary contract financing does not
require further justification, as it has
been determined to be in DoD’s best
interest, and the use of the specified
contract financing is an incentive for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:10 Jun 29, 2016
Jkt 238001
commercial companies to do business
with DoD.
This rule will apply to DoD
contractors, including small entities,
where a fixed-price contract with a
period of performance in excess of one
year and meeting the thresholds in FAR
32.104(d) is contemplated.
There is no change to reporting or
recordkeeping as a result of this rule.
This rule changes processes that are
internal to the Government and does not
have any impact on small entities for
reporting or recordkeeping.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap,
or conflict with any other Federal rules.
There are no known significant
alternative approaches to the rule that
would meet the requirements.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2015–D026), in
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 232
Government procurement.
Jennifer L. Hawes,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations
System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 232 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 232—CONTRACT FINANCING
1. The authority citation for part 232
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
2. Add section 232.104 to subpart
232.1 to read as follows:
■
232.104
Providing contract financing.
For fixed-price contracts with a
period of performance in excess of a
year that meet the dollar thresholds
established in FAR 32.104(d), and for
solicitations expected to result in such
contracts, in lieu of the requirement at
FAR 32.104(d)(1)(ii) for the contractor to
demonstrate actual financial need or the
unavailability of private financing, DoD
has determined that—
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(1) The use of customary contract
financing (see FAR 32.113), other than
loan guarantees and advance payments,
is in DoD’s best interest; and
(2) Further justification of its use in
individual acquisitions is unnecessary.
[FR Doc. 2016–15246 Filed 6–29–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 252
[Docket DARS–2016–0020]
RIN 0750–AI96
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement:
Administrative Cost To Issue and
Administer a Contract (DFARS Case
2016–D020)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
revise the estimated administrative cost
to award and administer a contract, for
the purpose of evaluating bids for
multiple awards.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
August 29, 2016, to be considered in the
formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by DFARS Case 2016–D020,
using any of the following methods:
Æ Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
entering ‘‘DFARS Case 2016–D020’’
under the heading ‘‘Enter keyword or
ID’’ and selecting ‘‘Search.’’ Select the
link ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘DFARS Case 2016–
D020.’’ Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ screen.
Please include your name, company
name (if any), and ‘‘DFARS Case 2016–
D020’’ on your attached document.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2016–D020 in the subject
line of the message.
Æ Fax: 571–372–6094.
Æ Mail: Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Attn: Mr.
Christopher Stiller, OUSD (AT&L)
DPAP/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060
Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC
20301–3060.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\30JNP1.SGM
30JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 126 (Thursday, June 30, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42607-42608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15246]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Part 232
[Docket DARS-2016-0009]
RIN 0750-AI90
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Contract
Financing (DFARS Case 2015-D026)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) regarding the use of customary contact
financing, other than loan guarantees and advance payments, on certain
fixed-price contracts.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before August 29, 2016, to be considered
in the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2015-D026, using
any of the following methods:
[cir] Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by entering ``DFARS Case 2015-D026''
under the heading ``Enter keyword or ID'' and selecting ``Search.''
Select the link ``Submit a Comment'' that corresponds with ``DFARS Case
2015-D026.'' Follow the instructions provided at the ``Submit a
Comment'' screen. Please include your name, company name (if any), and
``DFARS Case 2015-D026'' on your attached document.
[cir] Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include DFARS Case 2015-D026 in
the subject line of the message.
[cir] Fax: 571-372-6094.
[cir] Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Attn: Mr. Mark
Gomersall, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP/DARS, Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon,
Washington, DC 20301-3060.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting
(except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark Gomersall, telephone 571-372-
6099.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS regarding the use of customary
contract financing, other than loan guarantees and advance payments
identified in FAR part 32, on fixed-price contracts with a period of
performance in excess of one year that meet the dollar thresholds
established in FAR 32.104(d). DoD has determined that the use of such
customary contract financing provides improved cash flow as an
incentive for commercial companies to do business with DoD, is in DoD's
best interest, and requires no further justification of its use.
[[Page 42608]]
II. Discussion and Analysis
The proposed rule amends DFARS 232.104 to state that DoD has made
the determination that the use of customary contract financing (see FAR
32.113), other than loan guarantees and advance payments, is in DoD's
best interest, and further justification of its use is unnecessary on
fixed-price contracts that meet the dollar thresholds established in
FAR 32.104(d), with a period of performance in excess of a year, and in
solicitations expected to result in such contracts.
III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule
under 5 U.S.C. 804.
IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. However, an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis has been performed and is summarized as
follows:
DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to state that DoD has made the
determination that the use of customary contract financing (see Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 32.113), other than loan guarantees and
advance payments, is in DoD's best interest, and further justification
of its use is unnecessary on fixed-price contracts that meet the dollar
thresholds established in FAR 32.104(d), with a period of performance
in excess of a year, and in solicitations expected to result in such
contracts.
The objective of the proposed rule is to clarify that the use of
certain customary contract financing does not require further
justification, as it has been determined to be in DoD's best interest,
and the use of the specified contract financing is an incentive for
commercial companies to do business with DoD.
This rule will apply to DoD contractors, including small entities,
where a fixed-price contract with a period of performance in excess of
one year and meeting the thresholds in FAR 32.104(d) is contemplated.
There is no change to reporting or recordkeeping as a result of
this rule. This rule changes processes that are internal to the
Government and does not have any impact on small entities for reporting
or recordkeeping.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules. There are no known significant alternative approaches to
the rule that would meet the requirements.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2015-D026), in
correspondence.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
The rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 232
Government procurement.
Jennifer L. Hawes,
Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, 48 CFR part 232 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 232--CONTRACT FINANCING
0
1. The authority citation for part 232 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
0
2. Add section 232.104 to subpart 232.1 to read as follows:
232.104 Providing contract financing.
For fixed-price contracts with a period of performance in excess of
a year that meet the dollar thresholds established in FAR 32.104(d),
and for solicitations expected to result in such contracts, in lieu of
the requirement at FAR 32.104(d)(1)(ii) for the contractor to
demonstrate actual financial need or the unavailability of private
financing, DoD has determined that--
(1) The use of customary contract financing (see FAR 32.113), other
than loan guarantees and advance payments, is in DoD's best interest;
and
(2) Further justification of its use in individual acquisitions is
unnecessary.
[FR Doc. 2016-15246 Filed 6-29-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P