Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Kansas; Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, 42294-42295 [2016-15039]
Download as PDF
42294
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment
to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) Part 71 by modifying Class E
airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface at McNary Field
Airport, Salem, OR. On March 8, 2016
a Final Rule was published modifying
the airspace at McNary Field, Salem, OR
(81FR 12002). A comment was received
on May 10, 2016 questioning the safety
of the LOC/DME BC RWY 13 approach.
The FAA concurred that the presence of
terrain in the procedure turn transition
airspace increased the risk to IFR
operations into McNary Field, Salem,
OR. A Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) was
issued advising pilots this approach was
non-available pending the outcome of
this proposal. After a review of the
airspace, the FAA identified that the
approach to runway 31 also was not
fully contained in controlled airspace
and would also be modified by this
proposal. The Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface would be modified by
adding segments extending from the 6.7mile radius to 13.50 miles northwest of
the airport, and extending from the 8.2mile radius to 16.5 miles southeast of
the airport.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.9Z, dated August 6, 2015,
and effective September 15, 2015, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Jun 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0303; FRL–9948–12–
Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; State of
Kansas; Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
AGENCY:
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
December 1, 2015, State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submittal from Kansas
concerning allocations of Cross-State
Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) emission
allowances. Under CSAPR, large
electricity generating units in Kansas are
subject to a Federal Implementation
Plan (FIP) requiring the units to
participate in CSAPR’s Federal trading
program for annual emissions of
nitrogen oxides (NOX). This action
would approve Kansas’ adoption into its
SIP of state regulations establishing
state-determined allocations to replace
EPA’s default allocations to Kansas
units of CSAPR allowances for annual
NOX emissions for 2017 through 2019.
EPA is proposing to approve the SIP
revision because it meets the
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA)
and EPA’s regulations for approval of an
abbreviated SIP revision replacing
EPA’s default allocations of CSAPR
emission allowances with statedetermined allocations. Approval of this
SIP revision would not alter any
provision of CSAPR’s Federal trading
program for annual NOX emissions as
applied to Kansas units other than the
allowance allocation provisions, and the
FIP requiring the units to participate in
the trading program (as modified by the
SIP revision) would remain in place.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 29, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2016–0303, to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 6, 2015, and
effective September 15, 2015, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ANM OR E5 Salem, OR [Modified]
Salem, McNary Field, OR
(Lat. 44°54′34″ N., long. 123°00′09″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.2-mile
radius of McNary Field from the 168° bearing
from the airport clockwise to the 311°
bearing, and that airspace within a 6.7-mile
radius of McNary Field from the 311° bearing
from the airport clockwise to the 074°
bearing, and that airspace within an 8.2-mile
radius of McNary Field from the 074° bearing
from the airport clockwise to the 168° bearing
from the airport, and that airspace 2 miles
either side of the 330° bearing extending from
the 6.7-mile radius 13.5 miles northwest of
the airport and that airspace 4 miles
southwest and 5 miles northeast of the 150°
bearing extending from the 8.2-mile radius
16.5 miles southeast of the airport.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on June 21,
2016.
Tracey Johnson,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2016–15266 Filed 6–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 125 / Wednesday, June 29, 2016 / Proposed Rules
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Larry Gonzalez, Air Planning and
Development Branch, Air and Waste
Management Division, EPA Region 7,
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, KS
66219; telephone number: (913) 551–
7041; email address: gonzalez.larry@
epa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document proposes to take action on a
revision to the SIP for Kansas
concerning allocations of allowances
used in the Cross-State Air Pollution
Rule (CSAPR) 1 Federal trading program
for annual emissions of nitrogen oxides
(NOX). We have published a direct final
rule approving the State’s SIP revision
(s) in the Rules and Regulations section
of this Federal Register, because we
view this as a noncontroversial action
and anticipate no relevant adverse
comment. We have explained our
reasons for this action in the preamble
to the direct final rule. If we receive no
adverse comment, we will not take
further action on this proposed rule. If
we receive adverse comment, we will
withdraw the direct final rule and it will
not take effect. We would address all
public comments in any subsequent
final rule based on this proposed rule.
We do not intend to institute a second
comment period on this action. Any
parties interested in commenting must
do so at this time. For further
information, please see the information
provided in the ADDRESSES section of
this document.
Large electricity generating units in
Kansas are subject to a CSAPR Federal
Implementation Plan (FIP) that requires
the units to participate in the Federal
CSAPR NOX Annual Trading Program.2
Each of CSAPR’s Federal trading
programs includes default provisions
governing the allocation among
participating units of emission
allowances used for compliance under
that program. CSAPR also provides a
process for the submission and approval
of SIP revisions to replace EPA’s default
allocations with state-determined
allocations.
The SIP revision approved in the
direct final rule incorporates into
Kansas’s SIP state regulations
establishing state-determined allowance
allocations to replace EPA’s default
allocations to Kansas units of CSAPR
NOX Annual allowances issued for the
control periods in 2017 through 2019.
EPA is approving the SIP revision
because it meets the requirements of the
CAA and EPA’s regulations for approval
of an abbreviated SIP revision replacing
EPA’s default allocations of CSAPR
emission allowances with statedetermined allocations. Approval of the
SIP revision does not alter any provision
of the CSAPR NOX Annual Trading
Program as applied to Kansas units
other than the allowance allocation
provisions, and the FIP requiring the
units to participate in that program (as
modified by the SIP revision) remains in
place. Because the SIP revision
addresses only the control periods in
2017 through 2019, absent submission
and approval of a further SIP revision,
allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual
allowances for control periods in 2020
and later years will be made pursuant to
the default allocation provisions.
Large electricity generating units in
Kansas are also subject to an additional
CSAPR FIP requiring them to participate
in the Federal CSAPR SO2 Group 2
Trading Program. Kansas’ SIP submittal
does not seek to replace the default
allocations of CSAPR SO2 Group 2
allowances to Kansas units. Approval of
this SIP revision concerning another
CSAPR trading program has no effect on
the CSAPR SO2 Group 2 Trading
Program as applied to Kansas units, and
the FIP requiring the units to participate
in that program remains in place.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
1 Federal
Implementation Plans; Interstate
Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone and
Correction of SIP Approvals, 76 FR 48208 (August
8, 2011), (codified as amended at 40 CFR 52.38 and
52.39 and subparts AAAAA through DDDDD of 40
CFR part 97).
2 EPA has proposed to replace the terms
‘‘Transport Rule’’ and ‘‘TR’’ in the text of the Code
of Federal Regulations with the updated terms
‘‘Cross-State Air Pollution Rule’’ and ‘‘CSAPR.’’ 80
FR 75706, 75759 (December 3, 2015). EPA uses the
updated terms here.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Jun 28, 2016
Jkt 238001
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
42295
Dated: June 16, 2016.
Mark Hague,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2016–15039 Filed 6–28–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 150902809–6536–01]
RIN 0648–BF12
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery;
Widow Rockfish Reallocation in the
Individual Fishing Quota Fishery
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
In January 2011, NMFS
implemented the trawl rationalization
program, a type of catch share program,
for the Pacific coast groundfish fishery’s
limited entry trawl fleet, which includes
an individual fishing quota program for
limited entry trawl participants. At the
time of implementation, the widow
rockfish stock was overfished and quota
shares were allocated to quota share
permit owners in the individual fishing
quota program using an overfished
species formula. Now that the widow
rockfish stock has been rebuilt, NMFS
proposes to reallocate quota shares to
initial recipients based on a target
species formula that will more closely
represent the fishing history of permit
owners when widow rockfish was a
targeted species. Through this rule,
NMFS also proposes to allow the
trading of widow rockfish quota shares,
set a deadline for divestiture in case the
reallocation of widow rockfish puts any
QS permit owner over an accumulation
limit, and remove the daily vessel limit
for widow rockfish since it is no longer
an overfished species.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule
must be received on or before July 29,
2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2016–0037, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 125 (Wednesday, June 29, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 42294-42295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-15039]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2016-0303; FRL-9948-12-Region 7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
State of Kansas; Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a December 1, 2015, State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal
from Kansas concerning allocations of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
(CSAPR) emission allowances. Under CSAPR, large electricity generating
units in Kansas are subject to a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP)
requiring the units to participate in CSAPR's Federal trading program
for annual emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX). This action
would approve Kansas' adoption into its SIP of state regulations
establishing state-determined allocations to replace EPA's default
allocations to Kansas units of CSAPR allowances for annual
NOX emissions for 2017 through 2019. EPA is proposing to
approve the SIP revision because it meets the requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA) and EPA's regulations for approval of an abbreviated SIP
revision replacing EPA's default allocations of CSAPR emission
allowances with state-determined allocations. Approval of this SIP
revision would not alter any provision of CSAPR's Federal trading
program for annual NOX emissions as applied to Kansas units
other than the allowance allocation provisions, and the FIP requiring
the units to participate in the trading program (as modified by the SIP
revision) would remain in place.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 29, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2016-0303, to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the
[[Page 42295]]
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Larry Gonzalez, Air Planning and
Development Branch, Air and Waste Management Division, EPA Region 7,
11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, KS 66219; telephone number: (913) 551-
7041; email address: gonzalez.larry@epa.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document proposes to take action on a
revision to the SIP for Kansas concerning allocations of allowances
used in the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) \1\ Federal trading
program for annual emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX). We
have published a direct final rule approving the State's SIP revision
(s) in the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register,
because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no
relevant adverse comment. We have explained our reasons for this action
in the preamble to the direct final rule. If we receive no adverse
comment, we will not take further action on this proposed rule. If we
receive adverse comment, we will withdraw the direct final rule and it
will not take effect. We would address all public comments in any
subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. We do not intend to
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further
information, please see the information provided in the ADDRESSES
section of this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Federal Implementation Plans; Interstate Transport of Fine
Particulate Matter and Ozone and Correction of SIP Approvals, 76 FR
48208 (August 8, 2011), (codified as amended at 40 CFR 52.38 and
52.39 and subparts AAAAA through DDDDD of 40 CFR part 97).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Large electricity generating units in Kansas are subject to a CSAPR
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) that requires the units to
participate in the Federal CSAPR NOX Annual Trading
Program.\2\ Each of CSAPR's Federal trading programs includes default
provisions governing the allocation among participating units of
emission allowances used for compliance under that program. CSAPR also
provides a process for the submission and approval of SIP revisions to
replace EPA's default allocations with state-determined allocations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ EPA has proposed to replace the terms ``Transport Rule'' and
``TR'' in the text of the Code of Federal Regulations with the
updated terms ``Cross-State Air Pollution Rule'' and ``CSAPR.'' 80
FR 75706, 75759 (December 3, 2015). EPA uses the updated terms here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SIP revision approved in the direct final rule incorporates
into Kansas's SIP state regulations establishing state-determined
allowance allocations to replace EPA's default allocations to Kansas
units of CSAPR NOX Annual allowances issued for the control
periods in 2017 through 2019. EPA is approving the SIP revision because
it meets the requirements of the CAA and EPA's regulations for approval
of an abbreviated SIP revision replacing EPA's default allocations of
CSAPR emission allowances with state-determined allocations. Approval
of the SIP revision does not alter any provision of the CSAPR
NOX Annual Trading Program as applied to Kansas units other
than the allowance allocation provisions, and the FIP requiring the
units to participate in that program (as modified by the SIP revision)
remains in place. Because the SIP revision addresses only the control
periods in 2017 through 2019, absent submission and approval of a
further SIP revision, allocations of CSAPR NOX Annual
allowances for control periods in 2020 and later years will be made
pursuant to the default allocation provisions.
Large electricity generating units in Kansas are also subject to an
additional CSAPR FIP requiring them to participate in the Federal CSAPR
SO2 Group 2 Trading Program. Kansas' SIP submittal does not
seek to replace the default allocations of CSAPR SO2 Group 2
allowances to Kansas units. Approval of this SIP revision concerning
another CSAPR trading program has no effect on the CSAPR SO2
Group 2 Trading Program as applied to Kansas units, and the FIP
requiring the units to participate in that program remains in place.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 16, 2016.
Mark Hague,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2016-15039 Filed 6-28-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P