Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes, 41889-41892 [2016-14965]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Appendix 01, dated March 10, 2014. For
Model A318 series airplanes, use the
procedures specified for Model A319 series
airplanes in Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
32–1416, including Appendix 01, dated
March 10, 2014.
(j) Corrective Action
If, during any inspection required by
paragraph (i) of this AD, any damage is
detected: Before further flight, replace the
MLG sliding tube with a serviceable tube, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
32–1416, including Appendix 01, dated
March 10, 2014. For Model A318 series
airplanes, use the procedures specified for
Model A319 series airplanes in Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–32–1416, including
Appendix 01, dated March 10, 2014.
(k) Definition of Serviceable Sliding Tube
For the purpose of this AD, a serviceable
sliding tube is defined as a sliding tube that
meets the criterion in either paragraph (k)(1)
or (k)(2) of this AD.
(1) A sliding tube having a part number
and serial number not listed in table 1 to
paragraphs (h), (i), (k)(1), (k)(2), (l)(1), and
(l)(2) of this AD.
(2) A sliding tube having a part number
and serial number listed in table 1 to
paragraphs (h), (i), (k)(1), (k)(2), (l)(1), and
(l)(2) of this AD that has passed the
inspections required by paragraph (i) of this
AD.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(l) Parts Installation Prohibitions
(1) For airplanes that have an MLG sliding
tube installed that has a part number and
serial number listed in table 1 to paragraphs
(h), (i), (k)(1), (k)(2), (l)(1), and (l)(2) of this
AD: After an airplane is returned to service
following accomplishment of the actions
required by paragraphs (g), (h), and (i) of this
AD, no person may install on any airplane an
MLG sliding tube having a part number and
serial number listed in table 1 to paragraphs
(h), (i), (k)(1), (k)(2), (l)(1), and (l)(2) of this
AD unless that sliding tube has passed the
inspection required by paragraph (i) of this
AD.
(2) For airplanes that, as of the effective
date of this AD, do not have an MLG sliding
tube installed that has a part number and
serial number listed in table 1 to paragraphs
(h), (i), (k)(1), (k)(2), (l)(1), and (l)(2) of this
AD: No person may install on any airplane
an MLG sliding tube having a part number
and serial number listed in table 1 to
paragraphs (h), (i), (k)(1), (k)(2), (l)(1), and
(l)(2) of this AD unless that sliding tube has
passed the inspection required by paragraph
(i) of this AD.
(m) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Jun 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1405; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Required for Compliance (RC): If any
service information contains procedures or
tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(3) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(n) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits may be issued in
accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199
of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to
a location where the airplane can be
modified (if the operator elects to do so),
provided the MLG remains extended
throughout the flight.
(o) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2014–0058, dated
March 11, 2014, for related information. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov/
#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2015-0831-0003.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
41889
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 16,
2016.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–14969 Filed 6–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–7418; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–163–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–600–2A12
(CL–601 Variant), and CL–600–2B16
(CL–601–3A, CL–601–3R, and CL–604
Variants) airplanes. This proposed AD
was prompted by a report that a
potential chafing condition exists
between the negative-G fuel feed drain
line of the auxiliary power unit (APU)
and its surrounding structure and
components. This proposed AD would
require, for certain airplanes, a detailed
inspection for chafing conditions of the
negative-G fuel feed drain line of the
APU, and corrective actions if
necessary. For certain other airplanes,
this proposed AD would require
replacement of the APU negative-G fuel
feed tube assembly and the drain line.
We are proposing this AD to prevent a
chafing condition in the negative-G fuel
feed drain line, which can result in fuel
leaking from the drain line. Leakage of
the negative-G fuel feed drain line is a
dormant failure. This condition, in
combination with a nearby hot surface
or other potential ignition source, could
result in an uncontrolled fire in the aft
equipment bay.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 12, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JNP1.SGM
28JNP1
41890
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Bombardier, Inc.,
ˆ
400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone
514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may
view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
7418; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Norman Perenson, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion and Services Branch, ANE–
173, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone: 516–228–7337; fax:
516–794–5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2016–7418; Directorate Identifier
2015–NM–163–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Jun 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2015–26,
dated September 14, 2015 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL–
600–2A12 (CL–601 Variant) and CL–
600–2B16 (CL–601–3A, CL–601–3R, and
CL–604 Variants) airplanes. The MCAI
states:
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
It was reported that a potential chaffing
condition exist between the Auxiliary Power
Unit (APU) negative-G fuel feed drain line
and its surrounding structure and
components. Leakage of the negative-G fuel
feed drain line is a dormant failure, however,
in combination with a nearby hot surface or
other potential ignition source, could result
in an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment
bay.
This [Canadian] AD mandates [for certain
airplanes] the detailed visual inspection [for
chafing conditions, e.g., fouling between the
drain line and other components and
insufficient clearance] and, if required,
rectification [corrective actions], to ensure
required clearance between the APU
negative-G fuel feed drain line and its
surrounding structure and components [and,
for certain other airplanes, this [Canadian]
AD mandates replacement of the APU
negative-G fuel feed tube assembly and the
drain line].
Corrective actions include replacing
the APU negative-G fuel feed drain line.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
7418.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Bombardier, Inc. has issued the
following service information:
• Service Bulletin 601–0640, dated
May 19, 2015; and Service Bulletin 604–
28–021 dated May 19, 2015. The service
information describes procedures for a
detailed inspection for chafing
conditions of the negative-G fuel feed
drain line of the APU, and corrective
actions.
• Service Bulletin 605–28–009, dated
May 19, 2015. The service information
describes procedures for a detailed
inspection for chafing conditions of the
negative-G fuel feed drain line of the
APU, replacement of the APU negativeG fuel feed tube assembly and the drain
line, and corrective actions.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 504 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take
about 22 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $6,334 per
product. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of this proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $4,134,816 or
$8,204 per product.
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this proposed AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, we have included all costs in our
cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
E:\FR\FM\28JNP1.SGM
28JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA–2016–
7418; Directorate Identifier 2015–NM–
163–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 12,
2016.
(b) Affected ADs
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc.
airplanes, certificated in any category,
identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and
(c)(3) of this AD.
(1) Model CL–600–2A12 (CL–601 Variant)
airplanes, having serial numbers (S/Ns) 3001
through 3066 inclusive.
(2) Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–601–3A and
CL–601–3R Variants) airplanes, having S/Ns
5001 through 5194 inclusive.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Jun 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
(3) Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604 Variant)
airplanes, having S/Ns 5301 through 5665
inclusive, and 5701 through 5970 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28, Fuel.
41891
accordance with Part C of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 605–28–009, dated May 19,
2015.
Note 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD: An
inspection is not required.
(e) Reason
(i) Service Information Exception
This AD was prompted by a report that a
potential chafing condition exists between
the negative-G fuel feed drain line of the
auxiliary power unit (APU) and its
surrounding structure and components. We
are issuing this AD to prevent a chafing
condition in the negative-G fuel feed drain
line, which can result in fuel leaking from
the drain line. This condition, in
combination with a nearby hot surface or
other potential ignition source, could result
in an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment
bay.
Where any service information identified
in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this
AD specifies to contact the manufacturer for
corrective action, before further flight, repair
using a method approved by the Manager,
New York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
ANE–170, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil
Aviation (TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA
Design Approval Organization (DAO).
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection and Corrective Action for
Certain Airplanes
Within 24 months after the effective date
of this AD, comply with the applicable
actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through
(g)(3) of this AD, except as required by
paragraph (i) of this AD. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight.
(1) For Model CL–600–2A12 (CL–601
Variant) airplanes, having S/Ns 3001 through
3066 inclusive; and Model CL–600–2B16
(CL–601–3A and CL–601–3R Variants)
airplanes, having S/Ns 5001 through 5194
inclusive: Do a detailed inspection for
chafing conditions of the negative-G fuel feed
drain line of the APU, and do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 601–0640, dated May 19,
2015.
(2) For Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604
Variant) airplanes, having S/Ns 5301 through
5665 inclusive: Do a detailed inspection for
chafing conditions of the negative-G fuel feed
drain line of the APU, and do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 604–28–021, dated May 19,
2015.
(3) For Model CL–600–2B16 (CL–604
Variant) airplanes, having S/Ns 5701 through
5913 inclusive, 5917, 5918, and 5923 through
5970 inclusive: Do a detailed inspection for
chafing conditions of the negative-G fuel feed
drain line of the APU, and do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions in Part A and,
if applicable, Part B of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 605–28–009, dated May 19, 2015.
(h) Modification for Certain Other Airplanes
For Model CL–600–2B16 (604 Variant)
airplanes having S/Ns 5914 through 5916
inclusive and 5919 through 5922 inclusive:
Within 24 months after the effective date of
this AD, replace the APU negative–G fuel
feed tube assembly and the drain line, in
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO,
ANE–170, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Norman Perenson, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion and Services Branch, ANE–173,
FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516–228–7337; fax 516–794–5531. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the local
flight standards district office/certificate
holding district office. The AMOC approval
letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO, ANE–170,
FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.’s TCCA
DAO. If approved by the DAO, the approval
must include the DAO-authorized signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
Airworthiness Directive CF–2015–26, dated
September 14, 2015, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2016–7418.
(2) For service information identified in
ˆ
this AD, contact Bombardier, Inc., 400 Cote´
Vertu Road West, Dorval, Quebec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone 514–855–5000; fax 514–
855–7401; email thd.crj@
aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://
www.bombardier.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
E:\FR\FM\28JNP1.SGM
28JNP1
41892
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 16,
2016.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–14965 Filed 6–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–7269; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–198–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A300 series airplanes;
Model A300 B4–600, B4–600R, and F4–
600R series airplanes, and Model A300
C4–605R Variant F airplanes
(collectively called Model A300–600
series airplanes); and Model A310 series
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a report indicating that
during inspections to detect corrosion of
the bulk cargo doors, several cracks
were discovered. This proposed AD
would require a general visual
inspection of the bulk cargo door frame
to identify any structural repairs, a
detailed visual inspection of the frame
at the repaired area for any cracking if
necessary, and corrective actions if
necessary. We are proposing this AD to
detect and correct cracking of the bulk
cargo doors; such cracking could result
in rapid airplane decompression or
possible loss of the bulk cargo door.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 12, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Jun 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAW, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
7269; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan
Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–2125;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2016–7269; Directorate Identifier
2015–NM–198–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Directive 2015–0238, dated December
18, 2015 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for Airbus Model
A300 series airplanes; Model A300 B4–
600, B4–600R, and F4–600R series
airplanes, and Model A300 C4–605R
Variant F airplanes (collectively called
Model A300–600 series airplanes); and
Model A310 series airplanes. The MCAI
states:
During inspections to detect corrosion on
the Bulk Cargo Doors of Airbus A300 family
aeroplanes, several cracks were discovered.
Investigations revealed that a set of SRM
[structural repair manual] repair solutions
was defined in 1993, and was classified as
permanent and without limitation. As of
2011, this set of repair solutions was revised
and classified permanent, but with postrepair required actions.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could result in rapid
decompression events or even loss of the
bulk cargo door.
As per Ageing Aircraft rules, it was
determined that new inspections have to be
completed on the Bulk Cargo Door Frames to
detect potential fatigue damages on repaired
structures or to perform a new repair scheme.
Based on the fact that several aeroplanes
could potentially be flying with potential
fatigue damages on repaired structures,
Airbus was requested to issue Alert Operator
Transmission (AOT) A53W010–15 to provide
fleet-wide inspection instructions to address
this condition.
For the reasons describes above, this
[EASA] AD requires a one-time inspection of
the bulk cargo door frame to determine
whether a repair has been accomplished and,
depending on findings, accomplishment of
applicable corrective action(s).
The required actions in this NPRM
include a detailed visual inspection of
the bulk cargo door frame at the
repaired area for any cracking, repair of
cracks, and post-repair inspections of
crack-free frames. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2016–7269.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Airbus Alert Operators
Transmission A53W010–15, Revision
00, including Appendixes 1, 2, and 3,
dated December 15, 2015. The service
information describes a general visual
inspection of the bulk cargo door frame
to identify any structural repairs, and a
detailed visual inspection of the frame
at the repaired area. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
E:\FR\FM\28JNP1.SGM
28JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 124 (Tuesday, June 28, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41889-41892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14965]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-7418; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-163-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2A12 (CL-601 Variant), and CL-
600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R, and CL-604 Variants) airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by a report that a potential chafing condition
exists between the negative-G fuel feed drain line of the auxiliary
power unit (APU) and its surrounding structure and components. This
proposed AD would require, for certain airplanes, a detailed inspection
for chafing conditions of the negative-G fuel feed drain line of the
APU, and corrective actions if necessary. For certain other airplanes,
this proposed AD would require replacement of the APU negative-G fuel
feed tube assembly and the drain line. We are proposing this AD to
prevent a chafing condition in the negative-G fuel feed drain line,
which can result in fuel leaking from the drain line. Leakage of the
negative-G fuel feed drain line is a dormant failure. This condition,
in combination with a nearby hot surface or other potential ignition
source, could result in an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment bay.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 12, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-
[[Page 41890]]
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
7418; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman Perenson, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion and Services Branch, ANE-173, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone: 516-228-7337; fax: 516-794-5531.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-7418;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-163-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2015-26, dated September 14, 2015 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-
2A12 (CL-601 Variant) and CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A, CL-601-3R, and CL-604
Variants) airplanes. The MCAI states:
It was reported that a potential chaffing condition exist
between the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU) negative-G fuel feed drain
line and its surrounding structure and components. Leakage of the
negative-G fuel feed drain line is a dormant failure, however, in
combination with a nearby hot surface or other potential ignition
source, could result in an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment
bay.
This [Canadian] AD mandates [for certain airplanes] the detailed
visual inspection [for chafing conditions, e.g., fouling between the
drain line and other components and insufficient clearance] and, if
required, rectification [corrective actions], to ensure required
clearance between the APU negative-G fuel feed drain line and its
surrounding structure and components [and, for certain other
airplanes, this [Canadian] AD mandates replacement of the APU
negative-G fuel feed tube assembly and the drain line].
Corrective actions include replacing the APU negative-G fuel feed
drain line. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2016-7418.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Bombardier, Inc. has issued the following service information:
Service Bulletin 601-0640, dated May 19, 2015; and Service
Bulletin 604-28-021 dated May 19, 2015. The service information
describes procedures for a detailed inspection for chafing conditions
of the negative-G fuel feed drain line of the APU, and corrective
actions.
Service Bulletin 605-28-009, dated May 19, 2015. The
service information describes procedures for a detailed inspection for
chafing conditions of the negative-G fuel feed drain line of the APU,
replacement of the APU negative-G fuel feed tube assembly and the drain
line, and corrective actions.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 504 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 22 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost about $6,334
per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $4,134,816 or $8,204 per product.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
[[Page 41891]]
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2016-7418; Directorate Identifier
2015-NM-163-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 12, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. airplanes, certificated in
any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3) of
this AD.
(1) Model CL-600-2A12 (CL-601 Variant) airplanes, having serial
numbers (S/Ns) 3001 through 3066 inclusive.
(2) Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A and CL-601-3R Variants)
airplanes, having S/Ns 5001 through 5194 inclusive.
(3) Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-604 Variant) airplanes, having S/Ns
5301 through 5665 inclusive, and 5701 through 5970 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28, Fuel.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that a potential chafing
condition exists between the negative-G fuel feed drain line of the
auxiliary power unit (APU) and its surrounding structure and
components. We are issuing this AD to prevent a chafing condition in
the negative-G fuel feed drain line, which can result in fuel
leaking from the drain line. This condition, in combination with a
nearby hot surface or other potential ignition source, could result
in an uncontrolled fire in the aft equipment bay.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Inspection and Corrective Action for Certain Airplanes
Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD, comply
with the applicable actions specified in paragraphs (g)(1) through
(g)(3) of this AD, except as required by paragraph (i) of this AD.
Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight.
(1) For Model CL-600-2A12 (CL-601 Variant) airplanes, having S/
Ns 3001 through 3066 inclusive; and Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-601-3A and
CL-601-3R Variants) airplanes, having S/Ns 5001 through 5194
inclusive: Do a detailed inspection for chafing conditions of the
negative-G fuel feed drain line of the APU, and do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 601-0640, dated May 19,
2015.
(2) For Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-604 Variant) airplanes, having S/
Ns 5301 through 5665 inclusive: Do a detailed inspection for chafing
conditions of the negative-G fuel feed drain line of the APU, and do
all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 604-28-
021, dated May 19, 2015.
(3) For Model CL-600-2B16 (CL-604 Variant) airplanes, having S/
Ns 5701 through 5913 inclusive, 5917, 5918, and 5923 through 5970
inclusive: Do a detailed inspection for chafing conditions of the
negative-G fuel feed drain line of the APU, and do all applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions in Part A and, if applicable, Part B of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 605-28-009, dated May 19, 2015.
(h) Modification for Certain Other Airplanes
For Model CL-600-2B16 (604 Variant) airplanes having S/Ns 5914
through 5916 inclusive and 5919 through 5922 inclusive: Within 24
months after the effective date of this AD, replace the APU
negative-G fuel feed tube assembly and the drain line, in accordance
with Part C of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 605-28-009, dated May 19, 2015.
Note 1 to paragraph (h) of this AD: An inspection is not
required.
(i) Service Information Exception
Where any service information identified in paragraphs (g)(1),
(g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD specifies to contact the manufacturer
for corrective action, before further flight, repair using a method
approved by the Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), ANE-170, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO).
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it
to ATTN: Norman Perenson, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion and
Services Branch, ANE-173, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7337; fax 516-794-
5531. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically
reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, FAA; or TCCA; or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA DAO. If approved
by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized signature.
(k) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2015-26, dated September
14, 2015, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-7418.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone 514-855-5000; fax 514-855-
7401; email thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
[[Page 41892]]
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 16, 2016.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-14965 Filed 6-27-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P