Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries; Annual Specifications, 40844-40846 [2016-14839]
Download as PDF
40844
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
changes the vessel’s DAS declaration to
a monkfish DAS through the vessel’s
VMS unit during the course of the trip
in accordance with the provisions
specified under § 648.92(b)(1)(iii);
(B) A vessel issued a Category C or D
limited access monkfish permit is
fishing under both a monkfish and NE
multispecies Category A DAS in the
SFMA using roundfish gillnets, as
defined at § 648.2, with 6.5-inch (16.5cm) diamond mesh;
(C) A vessel issued a limited access
monkfish permit is fishing on a
monkfish-only DAS in the Mid-Atlantic
Exemption Area using roundfish gillnets
with a minimum mesh size of 5 inches
(12.7 cm) in accordance with the
provisions specified under
§ 648.80(c)(5); or
(D) A vessel issued a limited access
monkfish permit is fishing on a
monkfish-only DAS in the Southern
New England Dogfish Exemption Area
using roundfish gillnets with a
minimum mesh size of 6 inches (15.2
cm) in accordance with the provisions
specified under § 648.80(b)(7).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 648.92, revise paragraph
(b)(1)(i) to read as follows:
§ 648.92 Effort-control program for
monkfish limited access vessels.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) General provision. Each vessel
issued a limited access monkfish permit
shall be allocated 46 monkfish DAS
each fishing year, which must be used
in accordance with the provisions of
this paragraph (b), unless the permit is
enrolled in the Offshore Fishery
Program in the SFMA, as specified in
paragraph (b)(1)(iv) of this section. The
annual allocation of monkfish DAS to
each limited access monkfish permit
shall be reduced by the amount
calculated in paragraph (b)(1)(v) of this
section for the research DAS set-aside.
Unless otherwise specified in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section or under this
subpart F, a vessel issued a limited
access NE multispecies or limited access
sea scallop permit that is also issued a
limited access monkfish permit must
use a NE multispecies or sea scallop
DAS concurrently with each monkfish
DAS utilized.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. In § 648.94, revise paragraphs (b)(1)
and (b)(3)(i) to read as follows:
§ 648.94 Monkfish possession and landing
restrictions.
*
*
*
(b) * * *
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
17:14 Jun 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
(1) Vessels fishing under the monkfish
DAS program in the NFMA—
(i) Category A vessels. A limited
access monkfish Category A vessel that
fishes exclusively in the NFMA under a
monkfish DAS may land up to 1,250 lb
(567 kg) tail weight or 3,638 lb (1,650
kg) whole weight of monkfish per DAS
(or any prorated combination of tail
weight and whole weight based on the
conversion factor for tail weight to
whole weight of 2.91). For every 1 lb
(0.45 kg) of tail only weight landed, the
vessel may land up to 1.91 lb (0.87 kg)
of monkfish heads only, as described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(ii) Category B vessels. A limited
access monkfish Category B vessel that
fishes exclusively in the NFMA under a
monkfish DAS may land up to 600 lb
(272 kg) tail weight or 1,746 lb (792 kg)
whole weight of monkfish per DAS (or
any prorated combination of tail weight
and whole weight based on the
conversion factor for tail weight to
whole weight of 2.91). For every 1 lb
(0.45 kg) of tail only weight landed, the
vessel may land up to 1.91 lb (0.87 kg)
of monkfish heads only, as described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(iii) Category C vessels. A limited
access monkfish Category C vessel that
fishes exclusively in the NFMA under a
monkfish-only DAS may land up to
1,250 lb (567 kg) tail weight or 3,638 lb
(1,650 kg) whole weight of monkfish per
DAS (or any prorated combination of
tail weight and whole weight based on
the conversion factor for tail weight to
whole weight of 2.91). A limited access
monkfish Category C vessel that fishes
exclusively in the NFMA under both a
monkfish and NE multispecies DAS
may possess and land an unlimited
amount of monkfish. For every 1 lb
(0.45 kg) of tail only weight landed, the
vessel may land up to 1.91 lb (0.87 kg)
of monkfish heads only, as described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(iv) Category D vessels. A limited
access monkfish Category D vessel that
fishes exclusively in the NFMA under a
monkfish-only DAS may land up to 600
lb (272 kg) tail weight or 1,746 lb (792
kg) whole weight of monkfish per DAS
(or any prorated combination of tail
weight and whole weight based on the
conversion factor for tail weight to
whole weight of 2.91). A limited access
monkfish Category D vessel that fishes
exclusively in the NFMA under both a
monkfish and NE multispecies DAS
may possess and land an unlimited
amount of monkfish. For every 1 lb
(0.45 kg) of tail only weight landed, the
vessel may land up to 1.91 lb (0.87 kg)
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
of monkfish heads only, as described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(i) NFMA. Unless otherwise specified
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a
vessel issued a limited access monkfish
Category C permit that fishes under a
NE multispecies DAS, and not a
monkfish DAS, exclusively in the
NFMA may land up to 600 lb (272 kg)
tail weight or 1,746 lb (792 kg) whole
weight of monkfish per DAS (or any
prorated combination of tail weight and
whole weight based on the conversion
factor for tail weight to whole weight of
2.91). A vessel issued a limited access
monkfish Category D permit that fishes
under a NE multispecies DAS, and not
a monkfish DAS, exclusively in the
NFMA may land up to 500 lb (227 kg)
tail weight or 1,455 lb (660 kg) whole
weight of monkfish per DAS (or any
prorated combination of tail weight and
whole weight based on the conversion
factor for tail weight to whole weight of
2.91). A vessel issued a limited access
monkfish Category C, D, or F permit
participating in the NE Multispecies
Regular B DAS program, as specified
under § 648.85(b)(6), is also subject to
the incidental landing limit specified in
paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section on
such trips.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–14888 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 160617540–6540–01]
RIN 0648–XE695
Fisheries Off West Coast States;
Coastal Pelagic Species Fisheries;
Annual Specifications
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to implement
annual management measures and
harvest specifications to establish the
allowable catch levels (i.e. annual catch
limit (ACL)/harvest guideline (HG)) for
Pacific mackerel in the U.S. exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) off the West Coast
for the fishing season of July 1, 2016,
through June 30, 2017. This rule is
proposed pursuant to the Coastal
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery
Management Plan (FMP). The proposed
2016–2017 HG for Pacific mackerel is
21,161 metric tons (mt). This is the total
commercial fishing target level. NMFS
also proposes an annual catch target
(ACT), of 20,161 mt. If the fishery
attains the ACT, the directed fishery
will close, reserving the difference
between the HG (21,161 mt) and ACT as
a 1,000 mt set-aside for incidental
landings in other CPS fisheries and
other sources of mortality. This
proposed rule is intended to conserve
and manage the Pacific mackerel stock
off the U.S. West Coast.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 25, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2015–0048, by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150048, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
William W. Stelle, Jr., Regional
Administrator, West Coast Region,
NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE.,
Seattle, WA 98115–0070; Attn: Joshua
Lindsay.
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received, documented, and considered
by NMFS. Comments sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on www.regulations.gov without change.
All personal identifying information
(e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted
voluntarily by the sender will be
publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Copies of the report ‘‘Pacific Mackerel
(Scomber japonicus) Stock Assessment
for USA Management in the 2015–2016
Fishing Year’’ may be obtained from the
West Coast Region (see ADDRESSES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joshua Lindsay, West Coast Region,
NMFS, (562) 980–4034,
Joshua.Lindsay@noaa.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jun 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
During
public meetings each year, the estimated
biomass for Pacific mackerel is
presented to the Pacific Fishery
Management Council’s (Council) CPS
Management Team (Team), the
Council’s CPS Advisory Subpanel
(Subpanel) and the Council’s Scientific
and Statistical Committee (SSC), and the
biomass and the status of the fishery are
reviewed and discussed. The biomass
estimate is then presented to the
Council along with the recommended
overfishing limit (OFL) and acceptable
biological catch (ABC) calculations from
the SSC, along with the calculated ACL,
HG, and ACT recommendations, and
comments from the Team and Subpanel.
Following review by the Council and
after reviewing public comment, the
Council adopts a biomass estimate and
makes its catch level recommendations
to NMFS. Under the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., NMFS
manages the Pacific mackerel fishery in
the U.S. EEZ off the Pacific coast
(California, Oregon, and Washington) in
accordance with the FMP. Annual
Specifications published in the Federal
Register establish the allowable harvest
levels (i.e. OFL/ACL/HG) for each
Pacific mackerel fishing year. The
purpose of this proposed rule is to
implement the 2016–2017 ACL, HG,
ACT and other annual catch reference
points, including an OFL and an ABC
that take into consideration uncertainty
surrounding the current estimate of
biomass for Pacific mackerel in the U.S.
EEZ off the Pacific coast.
The CPS FMP and its implementing
regulations require NMFS to set these
annual catch levels for the Pacific
mackerel fishery based on the annual
specification framework and control
rules in the FMP. These control rules
include the HG control rule, which in
conjunction with the OFL and ABC
rules in the FMP, are used to manage
harvest levels for Pacific mackerel, in
accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. According to
the FMP, the quota for the principal
commercial fishery is determined using
the FMP-specified HG formula. The HG
is based, in large part, on the current
estimate of stock biomass. The annual
biomass estimates are an explicit part of
the various harvest control rules for
Pacific mackerel, and as the estimated
biomass decreases or increases from one
year to the next, the resulting allowable
catch levels similarly trend. The harvest
control rule in the CPS FMP is HG =
[(Biomass-Cutoff) * Fraction *
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40845
Distribution] with the parameters
described as follows:
1. Biomass. The estimated stock
biomass of Pacific mackerel. For the
2016–2017 management season this is
118,968 mt.
2. Cutoff. This is the biomass level
below which no commercial fishery is
allowed. The FMP established this level
at 18,200 mt.
3. Fraction. The harvest fraction is the
percentage of the biomass above 18,200
mt that may be harvested.
4. Distribution. The average portion of
the Pacific mackerel biomass estimated
in the U.S. EEZ off the Pacific coast is
70 percent and is based on the average
historical larval distribution obtained
from scientific cruises and the
distribution of the resource according to
the logbooks of aerial fish-spotters.
At the June 2015 Council meeting, the
Council adopted a new full stock
assessment for Pacific mackerel
completed by NMFS Southwest
Fisheries Science Center and along with
the Council’s SSC, approved the
resulting Pacific mackerel biomass
estimate of 118,968 mt as the best
available science for use in the 2016–
2017 fishing year. Based on
recommendations from its SSC and
other advisory bodies, the Council
recommended and NMFS is proposing,
an OFL of 24,983 mt, an ABC and ACL
of 22,822 mt, an HG of 21,161 mt, and
an ACT of 20,161 mt for the fishing year
of July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017.
Under this proposed action, upon
attainment of the ACT, the directed
fishing would close, reserving the
difference between the HG and ACT
(1,000 mt) as a set aside for incidental
landings in other CPS fisheries and
other sources of mortality. For the
remainder of the fishing year, incidental
landings would also be constrained to a
45 percent incidental catch allowance
when Pacific mackerel are landed with
other CPS (in other words, no more than
45 percent by weight of the CPS landed
per trip may be Pacific mackerel),
except that up to 3 mt of Pacific
mackerel could be landed incidentally
without landing any other CPS. Upon
attainment of the HG (21,161 mt), no
retention of Pacific mackerel would be
allowed in CPS fisheries. In previous
years, the incidental set-aside
established in the mackerel fishery has
been, in part, to ensure that if the
directed quota for mackerel was reached
that the operation of the Pacific sardine
fishery was not overly restricted. There
is no directed Pacific sardine fishery for
the 2016–2017 season; therefore, the
need for a high incidental set-aside is
reduced. The purpose of the incidental
set-aside and the allowance of an
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
40846
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
incidental fishery is to allow for
restricted incidental landings of Pacific
mackerel in other fisheries, particularly
other CPS fisheries, when the directed
fishery is closed to reduce potential
discard of Pacific mackerel and allow
for continued prosecution of other
important CPS fisheries.
The NMFS West Coast Regional
Administrator would publish a notice in
the Federal Register announcing the
date of any closure to either directed or
incidental fishing. Additionally, to
ensure the regulated community is
informed of any closure, NMFS would
also make announcements through other
means available, including fax, email,
and mail to fishermen, processors, and
state fishery management agencies.
Detailed information on the fishery
and the stock assessment are found in
the report ‘‘Pacific Mackerel (Scomber
japonicus) Stock Assessment for USA
Management in the 2015–16 Fishing
Year’’ (see ADDRESSES).
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
Assistant Administrator, NMFS, has
determined that this proposed rule is
consistent with the CPS FMP, other
provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, and other applicable law, subject to
further consideration after public
comment.
These proposed specifications are
exempt from review under Executive
Order 12866 because they contain no
implementing regulations.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities,
for the following reasons:
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) defines small
businesses engaged in finfish fishing as
those vessels with annual revenues of or
below $20.5 million. The small entities
that would be affected by the proposed
action are the vessels that compose the
West Coast CPS finfish fleet and are all
considered small businesses under these
size standards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jun 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
The small entities that would be
affected by the proposed action are
those vessels that harvest Pacific
mackerel as part of the West Coast CPS
purse seine fleet. The CPS FMP and its
implementing regulations requires
NMFS to set an OFL, ABC, ACL, HG, or
ACT for the Pacific mackerel fishery
based on the harvest control rules in the
FMP. These specific harvest control
rules are applied to the current stock
biomass estimate to derive these catch
specifications, which are used to
manage the commercial take of Pacific
mackerel. A component of these control
rules is that as the estimated biomass
decreases or increases from one year to
the next, so do the applicable quotas.
For the 2016–2017 Pacific mackerel
fishing season NMFS is proposing an
OFL of 24,983 metric tons (mt), an ABC
and ACL of 22,822 mt, an HG of 21,161
mt, and an ACT, which is the directed
fishing harvest target, of 20,161 mt.
These catch specifications are based on
a biomass estimate of 118,968 mt.
Pacific mackerel harvest is one
component of CPS fisheries off the U.S.
West Coast, which primarily includes
the fisheries for Pacific sardine,
northern anchovy, and market squid.
Pacific mackerel are principally caught
off southern California within the
limited entry portion (south of 39
degrees N. latitude; Point Arena,
California) of the fishery. Currently
there are 56 vessels permitted in the
Federal CPS limited entry fishery off
California of which about 25 to 39
vessels have been annually engaged in
harvesting Pacific mackerel in recent
years (2009–2015). For those vessels
that caught Pacific mackerel during that
time, the average annual per vessel
revenue has been about $1.25 million.
The individual vessel revenue for these
vessels is well below the SBA’s
threshold level of $20.5 million;
therefore, all of these vessels are
considered small businesses under the
RFA. Because each affected vessel is a
small business, this proposed rule has
an equal or similar effect on all of these
small entities, and therefore will impact
a substantial number of these small
entities in the same manner.
NMFS used the ex-vessel revenue
information for a profitability analysis,
as the cost data for the harvesting
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
operations of CPS finfish vessels was
limited or unavailable. For the 2015–
2016 fishing year, the maximum fishing
level was 25,291 mt and was divided
into a directed fishing harvest target
(ACT) of 20,469 mt and an incidental
set-aside of 5,000 mt. As of April 29,
2016 approximately 3,880 mt of Pacific
mackerel was harvested in the 2015–
2016 fishing season with an estimated
ex-vessel value of approximately
$931,200.
The maximum fishing level for the
2016–2017 Pacific mackerel fishing
season is 21,161 mt, with an ACT of
20,161 mt and an incidental set-aside of
1,000 mt. This proposed ACT is nearly
equivalent to the ACT established for
the previous year, thus it is highly
unlikely that the ACT proposed in this
rule will limit the potential profitability
to the fleet from catching Pacific
mackerel compared to last season or
recent catch levels, as shown below.
The annual average U.S. Pacific
mackerel harvest in recent years (2010–
2015) has been about 5,000 mt. In this
period, the landings have not exceeded
11,800 mt. Additionally, annual average
landings during the last decade (2005–
2015) have not been restricted by the
applicable quota. Accordingly, vessel
income from fishing is not expected to
be altered as a result of this rule as it
compares to recent catches in the
fishery, including under the previous
season’s regulations.
Based on the disproportionality and
profitability analysis above, the
proposed action, if adopted, will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
As a result, an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is not required, and
none has been prepared.
This action does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement
for purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: June 17, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–14839 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 121 (Thursday, June 23, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40844-40846]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14839]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 160617540-6540-01]
RIN 0648-XE695
Fisheries Off West Coast States; Coastal Pelagic Species
Fisheries; Annual Specifications
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to implement annual management measures and
harvest specifications to establish the allowable catch levels (i.e.
annual catch limit (ACL)/harvest guideline (HG)) for Pacific mackerel
in the U.S. exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the West Coast for the
fishing season of July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017. This rule is
proposed pursuant to the Coastal
[[Page 40845]]
Pelagic Species (CPS) Fishery Management Plan (FMP). The proposed 2016-
2017 HG for Pacific mackerel is 21,161 metric tons (mt). This is the
total commercial fishing target level. NMFS also proposes an annual
catch target (ACT), of 20,161 mt. If the fishery attains the ACT, the
directed fishery will close, reserving the difference between the HG
(21,161 mt) and ACT as a 1,000 mt set-aside for incidental landings in
other CPS fisheries and other sources of mortality. This proposed rule
is intended to conserve and manage the Pacific mackerel stock off the
U.S. West Coast.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 25, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document identified by NOAA-
NMFS-2015-0048, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0048, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to William W. Stelle, Jr.,
Regional Administrator, West Coast Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way
NE., Seattle, WA 98115-0070; Attn: Joshua Lindsay.
Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above
methods to ensure that the comments are received, documented, and
considered by NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered. All comments received are a part of the public
record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by the
sender will be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you
wish to remain anonymous).
Copies of the report ``Pacific Mackerel (Scomber japonicus) Stock
Assessment for USA Management in the 2015-2016 Fishing Year'' may be
obtained from the West Coast Region (see ADDRESSES).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Lindsay, West Coast Region,
NMFS, (562) 980-4034, Joshua.Lindsay@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During public meetings each year, the
estimated biomass for Pacific mackerel is presented to the Pacific
Fishery Management Council's (Council) CPS Management Team (Team), the
Council's CPS Advisory Subpanel (Subpanel) and the Council's Scientific
and Statistical Committee (SSC), and the biomass and the status of the
fishery are reviewed and discussed. The biomass estimate is then
presented to the Council along with the recommended overfishing limit
(OFL) and acceptable biological catch (ABC) calculations from the SSC,
along with the calculated ACL, HG, and ACT recommendations, and
comments from the Team and Subpanel. Following review by the Council
and after reviewing public comment, the Council adopts a biomass
estimate and makes its catch level recommendations to NMFS. Under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq., NMFS manages the Pacific mackerel fishery in the U.S. EEZ
off the Pacific coast (California, Oregon, and Washington) in
accordance with the FMP. Annual Specifications published in the Federal
Register establish the allowable harvest levels (i.e. OFL/ACL/HG) for
each Pacific mackerel fishing year. The purpose of this proposed rule
is to implement the 2016-2017 ACL, HG, ACT and other annual catch
reference points, including an OFL and an ABC that take into
consideration uncertainty surrounding the current estimate of biomass
for Pacific mackerel in the U.S. EEZ off the Pacific coast.
The CPS FMP and its implementing regulations require NMFS to set
these annual catch levels for the Pacific mackerel fishery based on the
annual specification framework and control rules in the FMP. These
control rules include the HG control rule, which in conjunction with
the OFL and ABC rules in the FMP, are used to manage harvest levels for
Pacific mackerel, in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. According to
the FMP, the quota for the principal commercial fishery is determined
using the FMP-specified HG formula. The HG is based, in large part, on
the current estimate of stock biomass. The annual biomass estimates are
an explicit part of the various harvest control rules for Pacific
mackerel, and as the estimated biomass decreases or increases from one
year to the next, the resulting allowable catch levels similarly trend.
The harvest control rule in the CPS FMP is HG = [(Biomass-Cutoff) *
Fraction * Distribution] with the parameters described as follows:
1. Biomass. The estimated stock biomass of Pacific mackerel. For
the 2016-2017 management season this is 118,968 mt.
2. Cutoff. This is the biomass level below which no commercial
fishery is allowed. The FMP established this level at 18,200 mt.
3. Fraction. The harvest fraction is the percentage of the biomass
above 18,200 mt that may be harvested.
4. Distribution. The average portion of the Pacific mackerel
biomass estimated in the U.S. EEZ off the Pacific coast is 70 percent
and is based on the average historical larval distribution obtained
from scientific cruises and the distribution of the resource according
to the logbooks of aerial fish-spotters.
At the June 2015 Council meeting, the Council adopted a new full
stock assessment for Pacific mackerel completed by NMFS Southwest
Fisheries Science Center and along with the Council's SSC, approved the
resulting Pacific mackerel biomass estimate of 118,968 mt as the best
available science for use in the 2016-2017 fishing year. Based on
recommendations from its SSC and other advisory bodies, the Council
recommended and NMFS is proposing, an OFL of 24,983 mt, an ABC and ACL
of 22,822 mt, an HG of 21,161 mt, and an ACT of 20,161 mt for the
fishing year of July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2017.
Under this proposed action, upon attainment of the ACT, the
directed fishing would close, reserving the difference between the HG
and ACT (1,000 mt) as a set aside for incidental landings in other CPS
fisheries and other sources of mortality. For the remainder of the
fishing year, incidental landings would also be constrained to a 45
percent incidental catch allowance when Pacific mackerel are landed
with other CPS (in other words, no more than 45 percent by weight of
the CPS landed per trip may be Pacific mackerel), except that up to 3
mt of Pacific mackerel could be landed incidentally without landing any
other CPS. Upon attainment of the HG (21,161 mt), no retention of
Pacific mackerel would be allowed in CPS fisheries. In previous years,
the incidental set-aside established in the mackerel fishery has been,
in part, to ensure that if the directed quota for mackerel was reached
that the operation of the Pacific sardine fishery was not overly
restricted. There is no directed Pacific sardine fishery for the 2016-
2017 season; therefore, the need for a high incidental set-aside is
reduced. The purpose of the incidental set-aside and the allowance of
an
[[Page 40846]]
incidental fishery is to allow for restricted incidental landings of
Pacific mackerel in other fisheries, particularly other CPS fisheries,
when the directed fishery is closed to reduce potential discard of
Pacific mackerel and allow for continued prosecution of other important
CPS fisheries.
The NMFS West Coast Regional Administrator would publish a notice
in the Federal Register announcing the date of any closure to either
directed or incidental fishing. Additionally, to ensure the regulated
community is informed of any closure, NMFS would also make
announcements through other means available, including fax, email, and
mail to fishermen, processors, and state fishery management agencies.
Detailed information on the fishery and the stock assessment are
found in the report ``Pacific Mackerel (Scomber japonicus) Stock
Assessment for USA Management in the 2015-16 Fishing Year'' (see
ADDRESSES).
Classification
Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the Assistant Administrator, NMFS, has
determined that this proposed rule is consistent with the CPS FMP,
other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, and other applicable law, subject to further
consideration after public comment.
These proposed specifications are exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 because they contain no implementing regulations.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
for the following reasons:
The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) defines small
businesses engaged in finfish fishing as those vessels with annual
revenues of or below $20.5 million. The small entities that would be
affected by the proposed action are the vessels that compose the West
Coast CPS finfish fleet and are all considered small businesses under
these size standards.
The small entities that would be affected by the proposed action
are those vessels that harvest Pacific mackerel as part of the West
Coast CPS purse seine fleet. The CPS FMP and its implementing
regulations requires NMFS to set an OFL, ABC, ACL, HG, or ACT for the
Pacific mackerel fishery based on the harvest control rules in the FMP.
These specific harvest control rules are applied to the current stock
biomass estimate to derive these catch specifications, which are used
to manage the commercial take of Pacific mackerel. A component of these
control rules is that as the estimated biomass decreases or increases
from one year to the next, so do the applicable quotas. For the 2016-
2017 Pacific mackerel fishing season NMFS is proposing an OFL of 24,983
metric tons (mt), an ABC and ACL of 22,822 mt, an HG of 21,161 mt, and
an ACT, which is the directed fishing harvest target, of 20,161 mt.
These catch specifications are based on a biomass estimate of 118,968
mt.
Pacific mackerel harvest is one component of CPS fisheries off the
U.S. West Coast, which primarily includes the fisheries for Pacific
sardine, northern anchovy, and market squid. Pacific mackerel are
principally caught off southern California within the limited entry
portion (south of 39 degrees N. latitude; Point Arena, California) of
the fishery. Currently there are 56 vessels permitted in the Federal
CPS limited entry fishery off California of which about 25 to 39
vessels have been annually engaged in harvesting Pacific mackerel in
recent years (2009-2015). For those vessels that caught Pacific
mackerel during that time, the average annual per vessel revenue has
been about $1.25 million. The individual vessel revenue for these
vessels is well below the SBA's threshold level of $20.5 million;
therefore, all of these vessels are considered small businesses under
the RFA. Because each affected vessel is a small business, this
proposed rule has an equal or similar effect on all of these small
entities, and therefore will impact a substantial number of these small
entities in the same manner.
NMFS used the ex-vessel revenue information for a profitability
analysis, as the cost data for the harvesting operations of CPS finfish
vessels was limited or unavailable. For the 2015-2016 fishing year, the
maximum fishing level was 25,291 mt and was divided into a directed
fishing harvest target (ACT) of 20,469 mt and an incidental set-aside
of 5,000 mt. As of April 29, 2016 approximately 3,880 mt of Pacific
mackerel was harvested in the 2015-2016 fishing season with an
estimated ex-vessel value of approximately $931,200.
The maximum fishing level for the 2016-2017 Pacific mackerel
fishing season is 21,161 mt, with an ACT of 20,161 mt and an incidental
set-aside of 1,000 mt. This proposed ACT is nearly equivalent to the
ACT established for the previous year, thus it is highly unlikely that
the ACT proposed in this rule will limit the potential profitability to
the fleet from catching Pacific mackerel compared to last season or
recent catch levels, as shown below. The annual average U.S. Pacific
mackerel harvest in recent years (2010-2015) has been about 5,000 mt.
In this period, the landings have not exceeded 11,800 mt. Additionally,
annual average landings during the last decade (2005-2015) have not
been restricted by the applicable quota. Accordingly, vessel income
from fishing is not expected to be altered as a result of this rule as
it compares to recent catches in the fishery, including under the
previous season's regulations.
Based on the disproportionality and profitability analysis above,
the proposed action, if adopted, will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. As a result, an
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required, and none has
been prepared.
This action does not contain a collection-of-information
requirement for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: June 17, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-14839 Filed 6-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P