Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of Southeastern California; Increased Assessment Rate, 40781-40783 [2016-14824]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 925
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–15–0077; SC16–925–1
FR]
Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of
Southeastern California; Increased
Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule implements a
recommendation from the California
Desert Grape Administrative Committee
(Committee) for an increase of the
assessment rate established for the 2016
and subsequent fiscal periods from
$0.0250 to $0.0300 per 18-pound lug of
grapes handled under the marketing
order (order). The Committee locally
administers the order, and is comprised
of producers and handlers of grapes
grown and handled in a designated area
of southeastern California. Assessments
upon grape handlers are used by the
Committee to fund reasonable and
necessary expenses of the program. The
fiscal period began on January 1 and
ends December 31. The assessment rate
will remain in effect indefinitely unless
modified, suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective June 24, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathie Notoro, Marketing Specialist, or
Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or Email:
Kathie.Notoro@ams.usda.gov or
Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette
Carter, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Order No.
925, as amended (7 CFR part 925),
regulating the handling of grapes grown
in a designated area of southeastern
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Jun 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
conformance with Executive Orders
12866, 13563, and 13175.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the marketing order now
in effect, grape handlers in a designated
area of southeastern California are
subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable grapes
beginning on January 1, 2016, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee for
the 2016 and subsequent fiscal periods
from $0.0250 to $0.0300 per 18-pound
lug of grapes handled.
The grape marketing order provides
authority for the Committee, with the
approval of USDA, to formulate an
annual budget of expenses and collect
assessments from handlers to administer
the program. The members of the
Committee are producers and handlers
of grapes grown in a designated area of
southeastern California. They are
familiar with the Committee’s needs and
with the costs of goods and services in
their local area and are thus in a
position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The
assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all
directly affected persons have an
opportunity to participate and provide
input.
For the 2015 and subsequent fiscal
periods, the Committee recommended,
and the USDA approved, an assessment
rate that would continue in effect from
fiscal period to fiscal period unless
modified, suspended, or terminated by
USDA based upon recommendation and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40781
information submitted by the
Committee or other information
available to USDA.
The Committee met on November 12,
2015, and unanimously recommended
2016 expenditures of $143,500, a
contingency reserve fund of $6,500, and
an assessment rate of $0.0300 per 18pound lug of grapes handled. In
comparison, last year’s budgeted
expenditures were $135,500. The
Committee recommended a crop
estimate of 5 million, 18-pound lugs,
which is lower than the 5.8 million, 18pound lugs handled last year. The
Committee also recommended carrying
over a financial reserve of $47,500,
which would increase to $54,000, at the
end of the fiscal period. The assessment
rate of $0.0300 per 18-pound lug of
grapes handled recommended by the
Committee is $0.0050 higher than the
$0.0250 rate currently in effect. The
higher assessment rate, applied to
shipments of 5 million, 18-pound lugs,
is expected to generate $150,000 in
revenue and be sufficient to cover
anticipated expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2016 fiscal period include $28,500 for
research, $20,080 for office expenses,
$56,500 for management and
compliance expenses, $25,000 for
consultation services, and $6,500 for a
contingency reserve. The $28,500
research project is a continuation of a
vine study in progress by the University
of California, Riverside.
In comparison, major expenditures for
the 2015 fiscal period included $15,500
for research, $17,000 for general office
expenses, $62,750 for management and
compliance expenses, $25,000 for
consultation services, and $9,500 for a
contingency reserve. Overall 2016
expenditures include a decrease in
management and compliance expenses,
and increases in office and research
expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by
evaluating several factors, including
estimated shipments for the 2016
season, proposed expenses, and the
level of available financial reserves. The
Committee determined that the $0.0300
assessment rate should generate
$150,000 in revenue to cover the
budgeted expenses of $143,500, and a
contingency reserve fund of $6,500.
Reserve funds by the end of 2016 are
projected to be $54,000. The reserve
would be well within the reserve
amount authorized under the order.
Section 925.41 of the order permits the
Committee to maintain approximately
one fiscal period’s expenses in reserve.
E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM
23JNR1
40782
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
based upon a recommendation and
information submitted by the
Committee or other available
information.
Although this assessment rate will be
in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA will evaluate the Committee’s
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
modification of the assessment rate is
needed. Further rulemaking will be
undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s 2016 budget and those for
subsequent fiscal periods will be
reviewed and, as appropriate, approved
by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 12 handlers
of southeastern California grapes who
are subject to regulation under the
marketing order and about 38 grape
producers in the production area. Small
agricultural service firms are defined by
the Small Business Administration as
those having annual receipts of less than
$7,500,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those whose
annual receipts are less than
$750,000(13 CFR 121.201).
Seven of the 12 handlers subject to
regulation have annual grape sales of
less than $7,500,000, according to
USDA Market News Service and
Committee data. In addition,
information from the Committee and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Jun 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
USDA’s Market News indicates that at
least nine of the 38 producers have
annual receipts of less than $750,000.
Based on the foregoing, it may be
concluded that slightly more than half
of the grape handlers and a minority of
the grape producers could be classified
as small entities.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the Committee and
collected from handlers for the 2016 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.0250
to $0.0300 per 18-pound lug of grapes.
The Committee unanimously
recommended 2016 expenditures of
$143,500, a contingency reserve fund of
$6,500, and an assessment rate of
$0.0300 per 18-pound lug of grapes
handled. The assessment rate of $0.0300
is $0.0050 higher than the 2015 rate.
The quantity of assessable grapes for the
2016 season is estimated at 5 million,
18-pound lugs. Thus, the $0.0300 rate
should generate $150,000 in income. In
addition, reserve funds at the end of the
year are projected to be $54,000, which
is well within the order’s limitation of
approximately one fiscal period’s
expenses.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2016 fiscal period include $28,500 for
research, $20,080 for general office
expenses, $56,500 for management and
compliance expenses, $25,000 for
consultation services and $6,500 for the
contingency reserve.
In comparison, major expenditures for
the 2015 fiscal period included $15,500
for research, $17,000 for general office
expenses, $62,750 for management and
compliance expenses, $25,000 for
consultation services, and $9,500 for a
contingency reserve. Overall 2016
expenditures include a decrease in
management and compliance expenses,
and increases in general office expenses,
and research expenses.
Prior to arriving at this budget and
assessment rate, a subcommittee met to
discuss this matter for the purpose of
making a recommendation to the
Committee. The Committee considered
alternative expenditures and assessment
rates, to include not increasing the
$0.0250 assessment rate. Based on a
crop estimate of 5 million, 18-pound
lugs, the Committee ultimately
determined that increasing the
assessment rate to $0.0300 would
generate sufficient funds to cover
budgeted expenses. Reserve funds at the
end of the 2016 fiscal period are
projected to be $54,000. This amount is
well within the amount authorized
under the order.
A review of historical crop and price
information, as well as preliminary
information pertaining to the upcoming
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
fiscal period, indicates that the shipping
point price for the 2015 season averaged
about $22.75 per 18-pound lug of
California desert grapes handled. If the
2016 price is similar to the 2015 price,
estimated assessment revenue as a
percentage of total estimated handler
revenue will be 0.13 percent for the
2016 season ($0.0300 divided by $22.75
per 18-pound lug).
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. However,
these costs are offset by the benefits
derived from the operation of the
marketing order. In addition, the
Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the grape
production area and all interested
persons were invited to attend and
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the November 12, 2015,
meeting was a public meeting and all
entities, both large and small, were able
to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189, Generic
Fruit Crops. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action
are necessary. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large California grape
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in the Federal
Register on March 10, 2016 (81 FR
12605). Copies of the proposed rule
were also provided to all grape
handlers. Finally, the proposal was
made available through the internet by
USDA and the office of the Federal
Register. A 15-day comment period
E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM
23JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 121 / Thursday, June 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
ending March 25, 2016, was provided
for interested persons to respond to the
proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Antoinette
Carter at the previously-mentioned
address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as herein set forth, will
tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also
found and determined that good cause
exists for not postponing the effective
date of this rule until 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register
because: (1) The 2016 fiscal period
began on January 1, 2016, and the
marketing order requires that the rate of
assessment for each fiscal period apply
to all assessable grapes handled during
such fiscal period; (2) the Committee
needs to have sufficient funds to pay its
expenses, which are incurred on a
continuous basis; and (3) handlers are
aware of this action, which was
unanimously recommended by the
Committee at a public meeting and is
similar to other assessment rate actions
issued in past years. Also, a 15-day
comment period was provided for in the
proposed rule and no comments were
received.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925
Grapes, Marketing agreements,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 925 is amended as
follows:
PART 925—GRAPES GROWN IN A
DESIGNATED AREA OF
SOUTHEASTERN CALIFORNIA
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Section 925.215 is revised to read
as follows:
■
Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2016, an
assessment rate of $0.0300 per 18-pound
lug is established for grapes grown in a
designated area of southeastern
California.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 Jun 22, 2016
Jkt 238001
[FR Doc. 2016–14824 Filed 6–22–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 748
[Docket No. 160303186–6186–01]
RIN 0694–AG91
Amendments to Existing Validated
End-User Authorization in the People’s
Republic of China: Advanced Micro
Devices, Inc.
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this rule, the Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS) amends the
Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) to revise the existing Validated
End-User (VEU) list for the People’s
Republic of China by updating the list
of eligible items and destinations
(facilities) for VEU Advanced Micro
Devices, Inc. (AMD). Specifically, BIS
amends Supplement No. 7 to part 748
of the EAR to remove an existing
‘‘eligible destination’’ (facility); add a
building to an existing address at one of
AMD’s already approved facilities to
which eligible items may be exported,
reexported or transferred (in-country);
and reflect the recent removal of an
existing ‘‘eligible item’’ from the
Commerce Control List (CCL).
DATES: This rule is effective June 23,
2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chair, End-User Review Committee,
Office of the Assistant Secretary, Export
Administration, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Phone: 202–482–5991; Email: ERC@
bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 925 continues to read as follows:
■
§ 925.215
Dated: June 17, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
Authorization Validated End-User
Validated End-Users (VEUs) are
designated entities located in eligible
destinations to which eligible items may
be exported, reexported, or transferred
(in-country) under a general
authorization instead of a license. The
names of the VEUs, as well as the dates
they were so designated, and their
respective eligible destinations
(facilities) and items are identified in
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40783
Supplement No. 7 to part 748 of the
EAR. Under the terms described in that
supplement, VEUs may obtain eligible
items without an export license from
BIS, in conformity with section 748.15
of the EAR. Eligible items vary between
VEUs and may include commodities,
software, and technology, except those
controlled for missile technology or
crime control reasons on the Commerce
Control List (CCL) (part 774 of the EAR).
VEUs are reviewed and approved by
the U.S. Government in accordance with
the provisions of section 748.15 and
Supplement Nos. 8 and 9 to part 748 of
the EAR. The End-User Review
Committee (ERC), composed of
representatives from the Departments of
State, Defense, Energy, Commerce, and
other agencies as appropriate, is
responsible for administering the VEU
program. BIS amended the EAR in a
final rule published on June 19, 2007
(72 FR 33646), to create Authorization
VEU.
Amendments to Existing VEU
Authorization for Advanced Micro
Devices, Inc. (AMD) in the People’s
Republic of China
Revision to the List of ‘‘Eligible
Destinations’’ and ‘‘Eligible Items’’ for
AMD
In this final rule, BIS amends
Supplement No. 7 to part 748 to revise
AMD’s VEU authorization. Specifically,
in this rule BIS removes one of AMD’s
existing eligible destinations (facilities).
Also, in this rule, BIS adds a building
to an existing address at one of AMD’s
facilities already approved under
Authorization VEU, to which the
company’s eligible items may be
exported, reexported or transferred (incountry) in the People’s Republic of
China (PRC) under the authorization.
Finally, in this rule, BIS removes Export
Control Classification Number (ECCN)
4D002 from the list of AMD’s eligible
items to reflect the removal of that item
from the CCL by 80 FR 29432 (May 21,
2015). The amendments to the eligible
destinations (facilities) are in response
to a request from AMD, while the
amendment to the eligible items list
reflects the recent removal of that ECCN
from the CCL. All amendments were
approved by the ERC. The revisions are
as follows:
Removal of AMD’s Eligible Destination
(Facility)
AMD Technologies (China) Co., Ltd.,
No. 88, Su Tong Road, Suzhou, China
215021.
E:\FR\FM\23JNR1.SGM
23JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 121 (Thursday, June 23, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40781-40783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14824]
[[Page 40781]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 925
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-15-0077; SC16-925-1 FR]
Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of Southeastern California;
Increased Assessment Rate
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule implements a recommendation from the California
Desert Grape Administrative Committee (Committee) for an increase of
the assessment rate established for the 2016 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $0.0250 to $0.0300 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled
under the marketing order (order). The Committee locally administers
the order, and is comprised of producers and handlers of grapes grown
and handled in a designated area of southeastern California.
Assessments upon grape handlers are used by the Committee to fund
reasonable and necessary expenses of the program. The fiscal period
began on January 1 and ends December 31. The assessment rate will
remain in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or
terminated.
DATES: Effective June 24, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathie Notoro, Marketing Specialist,
or Jeffrey Smutny, Regional Director, California Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops
Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906, or
Email: Kathie.Notoro@ams.usda.gov or Jeffrey.Smutny@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Antoinette Carter, Marketing Order and
Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400
Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237;
Telephone: (202) 720-2491, Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email:
Antoinette.Carter@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule is issued under Marketing Order
No. 925, as amended (7 CFR part 925), regulating the handling of grapes
grown in a designated area of southeastern California, hereinafter
referred to as the ``order.'' The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.''
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13175.
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the marketing order now in effect, grape handlers
in a designated area of southeastern California are subject to
assessments. Funds to administer the order are derived from such
assessments. It is intended that the assessment rate as issued herein
will be applicable to all assessable grapes beginning on January 1,
2016, and continue until amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee for the 2016 and subsequent fiscal periods from $0.0250 to
$0.0300 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled.
The grape marketing order provides authority for the Committee,
with the approval of USDA, to formulate an annual budget of expenses
and collect assessments from handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are producers and handlers of grapes grown in
a designated area of southeastern California. They are familiar with
the Committee's needs and with the costs of goods and services in their
local area and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate
budget and assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and
discussed in a public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have
an opportunity to participate and provide input.
For the 2015 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and the USDA approved, an assessment rate that would
continue in effect from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA based upon recommendation and
information submitted by the Committee or other information available
to USDA.
The Committee met on November 12, 2015, and unanimously recommended
2016 expenditures of $143,500, a contingency reserve fund of $6,500,
and an assessment rate of $0.0300 per 18-pound lug of grapes handled.
In comparison, last year's budgeted expenditures were $135,500. The
Committee recommended a crop estimate of 5 million, 18-pound lugs,
which is lower than the 5.8 million, 18-pound lugs handled last year.
The Committee also recommended carrying over a financial reserve of
$47,500, which would increase to $54,000, at the end of the fiscal
period. The assessment rate of $0.0300 per 18-pound lug of grapes
handled recommended by the Committee is $0.0050 higher than the $0.0250
rate currently in effect. The higher assessment rate, applied to
shipments of 5 million, 18-pound lugs, is expected to generate $150,000
in revenue and be sufficient to cover anticipated expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2016
fiscal period include $28,500 for research, $20,080 for office
expenses, $56,500 for management and compliance expenses, $25,000 for
consultation services, and $6,500 for a contingency reserve. The
$28,500 research project is a continuation of a vine study in progress
by the University of California, Riverside.
In comparison, major expenditures for the 2015 fiscal period
included $15,500 for research, $17,000 for general office expenses,
$62,750 for management and compliance expenses, $25,000 for
consultation services, and $9,500 for a contingency reserve. Overall
2016 expenditures include a decrease in management and compliance
expenses, and increases in office and research expenses.
The assessment rate recommended by the Committee was derived by
evaluating several factors, including estimated shipments for the 2016
season, proposed expenses, and the level of available financial
reserves. The Committee determined that the $0.0300 assessment rate
should generate $150,000 in revenue to cover the budgeted expenses of
$143,500, and a contingency reserve fund of $6,500.
Reserve funds by the end of 2016 are projected to be $54,000. The
reserve would be well within the reserve amount authorized under the
order. Section 925.41 of the order permits the Committee to maintain
approximately one fiscal period's expenses in reserve.
[[Page 40782]]
The assessment rate established in this rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
based upon a recommendation and information submitted by the Committee
or other available information.
Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate the
Committee's recommendations and other available information to
determine whether modification of the assessment rate is needed.
Further rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's
2016 budget and those for subsequent fiscal periods will be reviewed
and, as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 12 handlers of southeastern California
grapes who are subject to regulation under the marketing order and
about 38 grape producers in the production area. Small agricultural
service firms are defined by the Small Business Administration as those
having annual receipts of less than $7,500,000, and small agricultural
producers are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than
$750,000(13 CFR 121.201).
Seven of the 12 handlers subject to regulation have annual grape
sales of less than $7,500,000, according to USDA Market News Service
and Committee data. In addition, information from the Committee and
USDA's Market News indicates that at least nine of the 38 producers
have annual receipts of less than $750,000. Based on the foregoing, it
may be concluded that slightly more than half of the grape handlers and
a minority of the grape producers could be classified as small
entities.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the
Committee and collected from handlers for the 2016 and subsequent
fiscal periods from $0.0250 to $0.0300 per 18-pound lug of grapes. The
Committee unanimously recommended 2016 expenditures of $143,500, a
contingency reserve fund of $6,500, and an assessment rate of $0.0300
per 18-pound lug of grapes handled. The assessment rate of $0.0300 is
$0.0050 higher than the 2015 rate. The quantity of assessable grapes
for the 2016 season is estimated at 5 million, 18-pound lugs. Thus, the
$0.0300 rate should generate $150,000 in income. In addition, reserve
funds at the end of the year are projected to be $54,000, which is well
within the order's limitation of approximately one fiscal period's
expenses.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2016
fiscal period include $28,500 for research, $20,080 for general office
expenses, $56,500 for management and compliance expenses, $25,000 for
consultation services and $6,500 for the contingency reserve.
In comparison, major expenditures for the 2015 fiscal period
included $15,500 for research, $17,000 for general office expenses,
$62,750 for management and compliance expenses, $25,000 for
consultation services, and $9,500 for a contingency reserve. Overall
2016 expenditures include a decrease in management and compliance
expenses, and increases in general office expenses, and research
expenses.
Prior to arriving at this budget and assessment rate, a
subcommittee met to discuss this matter for the purpose of making a
recommendation to the Committee. The Committee considered alternative
expenditures and assessment rates, to include not increasing the
$0.0250 assessment rate. Based on a crop estimate of 5 million, 18-
pound lugs, the Committee ultimately determined that increasing the
assessment rate to $0.0300 would generate sufficient funds to cover
budgeted expenses. Reserve funds at the end of the 2016 fiscal period
are projected to be $54,000. This amount is well within the amount
authorized under the order.
A review of historical crop and price information, as well as
preliminary information pertaining to the upcoming fiscal period,
indicates that the shipping point price for the 2015 season averaged
about $22.75 per 18-pound lug of California desert grapes handled. If
the 2016 price is similar to the 2015 price, estimated assessment
revenue as a percentage of total estimated handler revenue will be 0.13
percent for the 2016 season ($0.0300 divided by $22.75 per 18-pound
lug).
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. However, these costs
are offset by the benefits derived from the operation of the marketing
order. In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the grape production area and all interested persons were
invited to attend and participate in Committee deliberations on all
issues. Like all Committee meetings, the November 12, 2015, meeting was
a public meeting and all entities, both large and small, were able to
express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and
assigned OMB No. 0581-0189, Generic Fruit Crops. No changes in those
requirements as a result of this action are necessary. Should any
changes become necessary, they would be submitted to OMB for approval.
This rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large California grape handlers. As
with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in the Federal
Register on March 10, 2016 (81 FR 12605). Copies of the proposed rule
were also provided to all grape handlers. Finally, the proposal was
made available through the internet by USDA and the office of the
Federal Register. A 15-day comment period
[[Page 40783]]
ending March 25, 2016, was provided for interested persons to respond
to the proposal. No comments were received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Antoinette Carter at the
previously-mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as herein set
forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined that good
cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until
30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) The 2016
fiscal period began on January 1, 2016, and the marketing order
requires that the rate of assessment for each fiscal period apply to
all assessable grapes handled during such fiscal period; (2) the
Committee needs to have sufficient funds to pay its expenses, which are
incurred on a continuous basis; and (3) handlers are aware of this
action, which was unanimously recommended by the Committee at a public
meeting and is similar to other assessment rate actions issued in past
years. Also, a 15-day comment period was provided for in the proposed
rule and no comments were received.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 925
Grapes, Marketing agreements, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 925 is
amended as follows:
PART 925--GRAPES GROWN IN A DESIGNATED AREA OF SOUTHEASTERN
CALIFORNIA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 925 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Section 925.215 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 925.215 Assessment rate.
On and after January 1, 2016, an assessment rate of $0.0300 per 18-
pound lug is established for grapes grown in a designated area of
southeastern California.
Dated: June 17, 2016.
Elanor Starmer,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-14824 Filed 6-22-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P