Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 40335-40337 [2016-14586]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2016 / Notices
Knowledge Management database and
places email subscription information
into a database maintained by a thirdparty vendor that serves multiple
Federal agencies and the White House.
Customers can change, add, or delete
their information from either system at
any time.
The respondents are behavioral health
professionals, researchers, parents,
caregivers, and the general public.
40335
There are no changes to the burden or
the forms.
SAMHSA estimates the burden of this
information collection as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN
Number of
respondents
Annual
frequency
per response
Total annual
responses
Hours per response
Total hours
Website Registration .............................................
Email Update Subscription ....................................
38,605
21,138
1
1
38,605
21,138
.033 (2 min.) ................
.017 (1 min.) ................
1,286
359
Total ................................................................
59,743
........................
59,743
......................................
1,645
Send comments to Summer King,
SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer,
5600 Fishers Lane, Room 15E57–B,
Rockville, Maryland 20857, OR email a
copy to summer.king@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Written comments should be received
by August 22, 2016.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2016–14581 Filed 6–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
Project: Opioid Drugs in Maintenance
and Detoxification Treatment of Opioid
Dependence—42 CFR Part 8 (OMB No.
0930–0206) and Opioid Treatment
Programs (OTPs)—Revision
42 CFR part 8 establishes a
certification program managed by
SAMHSA’s Center for Substance Abuse
Treatment (CSAT). The regulation
requires that Opioid Treatment
Programs (OTPs) be certified.
‘‘Certification’’ is the process by which
SAMHSA determines that an OTP is
qualified to provide opioid treatment
under the Federal opioid treatment
standards established by the Secretary
of Health and Human Services. To
become certified, an OTP must be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Jun 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
accredited by a SAMHSA-approved
accreditation body. The regulation also
provides standards for such services as
individualized treatment planning,
increased medical supervision, and
assessment of patient outcomes. This
submission seeks continued approval of
the information collection requirements
in the regulation and of the forms used
in implementing the regulation.
SAMHSA currently has approval for
the Application for Certification to Use
Opioid Drugs in a Treatment Program
Under 42 CFR 8.11 (Form SMA–162);
the Application for Approval as
Accreditation Body Under 42 CFR 8.3(b)
(Form SMA–163); and the Exception
Request and Record of Justification
Under 42 CFR 8.12 (Form SMA–168),
which may be used by physicians when
there is a patient care situation in which
the physician must make a treatment
decision that differs from the treatment
regimen required by the regulation.
Form SMA–168 is a simplified,
standardized form to facilitate the
documentation, request, and approval
process for exceptions.
SAMHSA believes that the
recordkeeping requirements in the
regulation are customary and usual
practices within the medical and
rehabilitative communities and has not
calculated a response burden for them.
The recordkeeping requirements set
forth in 42 CFR 8.4, 8.11, and 8.12
include maintenance of the following: 5year retention by accreditation bodies of
certain records pertaining to
accreditation, and documentation by an
OTP of the following: A patient’s
medical examination when admitted to
treatment, a patient’s history, a
treatment plan, any prenatal support
provided to the patient, justification of
unusually large initial doses, changes in
a patient’s dosage schedule, justification
of unusually large daily doses, the
rationale for decreasing a patient’s clinic
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
attendance, and documentation of
physiologic dependence.
The rule also includes requirements
that OTPs and accreditation
organizations disclose information. For
example, 42 CFR 8.12(e)(1) requires that
a physician explain the facts concerning
the use of opioid drug treatment to each
patient. This type of disclosure is
considered to be consistent with the
common medical practice and is not
considered an additional burden.
Further, the rule requires, under section
8.4(i)(1) that accreditation organizations
shall make public their fee structure;
this type of disclosure is standard
business practice and is not considered
a burden.
A number of changes have been made
to the forms. Forms have been reworded
for clarification, updated with current
SAMHSA mailing and web-submission
information, and a few additional fields
have been provided for clarity and for
providers to best explain their services
(e.g., expanding the former global
patient census in the SMA–162 to
request patient census by drug type—
methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone,
or other) and the needs of their patients
(e.g., including urinalysis results on the
SMA–168 and adding ‘‘weather crisis’’
as a standard option for physician
justification of the requested exception).
Amendments also include the removal
of information pertaining to faxing the
forms to SAMHSA, as this is no longer
an acceptable form of submission. The
burden hours have increased slightly
(by 28% or approximately 639 hours)
due to an increase in the number of
facilities accredited and certified by
SAMHSA since the previous
submissions of these forms. The forms
are available online with a unique
feature for both the SMA–162 and
SMA–168 that pre-populates certain
information within the form. This in
turn reduces the program’s time spent
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
40336
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2016 / Notices
filling out the forms as well as the staff
time spent on processing it.
The tables that follow summarize the
annual reporting burden associated with
the regulation, including burden
associated with the forms.
ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT BURDEN FOR ACCREDITATION BODIES
Number of
respondents
42 CFR Citation
Purpose
8.3(b)(1–11) ........
8.3(c) ..................
8.3(e) ..................
8.3(f)(2) ...............
Initial approval (SMA–163) .................
Renewal of approval (SMA–163) ........
Relinquishment notification .................
Non-renewal notification to accredited
OTPs.
Notification to SAMHSA for seriously
noncompliant OTPs.
Notification to OTP for serious noncompliance.
General documents and information
to SAMHSA upon request.
Accreditation survey to SAMHSA
upon request.
List of surveys, surveyors to SAMHSA
upon request.
Report of less than full accreditation
to SAMHSA.
Summaries of Inspections ..................
Notifications of Complaints .................
Revocation notification to Accredited
OTPs.
Submission of 90-day corrective plan
to SAMHSA.
Notification to accredited OTPs of
Probationary Status.
8.4(b)(1)(ii) ..........
8.4(b)(1)(iii) .........
8.4(d)(1) ..............
8.4(d)(2) ..............
8.4(d)(3) ..............
8.4(d)(4) ..............
8.4(d)(5) ..............
8.4(e) ..................
8.6(a)(2) and
(b)(3).
8.6(b) ..................
8.6(b)(1) ..............
Subtotal .......
Responses/
respondent
Total
responses
Hours/
response
Total
hours
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
90
6.00
1.00
0.50
0.10
6.00
2.00
0.50
9.00
2
2
4
1.00
4.00
2
10
20
1.00
20.00
6
5
30
0.50
15.00
6
75
450
0.02
9.00
6
6
36
0.20
7.20
6
5
30
0.50
15.00
6
12
1
50
6
185
300
72
185
0.50
0.50
0.30
150.00
36.00
55.50
1
1
1
10.00
10.00
1
185
185
0.30
55.50
54
.............................................................
1
1
1
90
........................
1,407
........................
394.70
ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT BURDEN FOR OPIOID TREATMENT PROGRAMS
Number of
respondents
42 CFR Citation
Purpose
8.11(b) ................
8.11(b) ................
8.11(e)(1) ............
8.11(e)(2) ............
Renewal of approval (SMA–162) ........
Relocation of Program (SMA–162) .....
Application for provisional certification
Application for extension of provisional certification.
Notification of sponsor or medical director change (SMA–162).
Documentation to SAMHSA for interim maintenance.
Request to SAMHSA for Exemption
from 8.11 and 8.12 (including
SMA–168).
Notification to SAMHSA Before Establishing Medication Units (SMA–162).
Notification to State Health Officer
When Patient Begins Interim Maintenance.
Contents of Appellant Request for Review of Suspension.
Informal Review Request ....................
Appellant’s Review File and Written
Statement.
Appellant’s Request for Expedited Review.
Appellant Review File and Written
Statement.
8.11(f)(5) .............
8.11(g)(2) ............
8.11(h) ................
8.11(i)(1) .............
8.12(j)(2) .............
8.24 .....................
8.25(a) ................
8.26(a) ................
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
8.28(a) ................
8.28(c) ................
Responses/
respondent
Total
responses
Hours/
response
Total hours
386
35
42
30
1
1
1
1
386
35
42
30
0.15
1.17
1.00
0.25
57.90
40.95
42.00
7.50
60
1
60
0.10
6.00
1
1
1
1.00
1.00
1,325
25
33,125
0.07
2,318.75
10
1
10
0.25
2.50
1
20
20
0.33
6.60
2
1
2
0.25
.50
2
2
1
1
2
2
1.00
5.00
2.00
10.00
2
1
2
1.00
2.00
2
1
2
5.00
10.00
Subtotal .......
.............................................................
1,900
........................
33,719
........................
2,507.70
Total .....
.............................................................
1,954
........................
35,126
........................
2,902.40
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Jun 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2016 / Notices
Written comments and
recommendations concerning the
proposed information collection should
be sent by July 21, 2016 to the SAMHSA
Desk Officer at the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). To
ensure timely receipt of comments, and
to avoid potential delays in OMB’s
receipt and processing of mail sent
through the U.S. Postal Service,
commenters are encouraged to submit
their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov.
Although commenters are encouraged to
send their comments via email,
commenters may also fax their
comments to: 202–395–7285.
Commenters may also mail them to:
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, New Executive Office Building,
Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2016–14586 Filed 6–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health
Services Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of
information collection requests under
OMB review, in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports
Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Project: Monitoring of the National
Suicide Prevention Lifeline (OMB No.
0930–0274) Revision
The Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration
(SAMHSA) Center for Mental Health
Services (CMHS) is requesting approval
for the revision of data collection
associated with the previously-approved
Monitoring of the National Suicide
Prevention Lifeline (OMB No. 0930–
0274; Expiration, July 31, 2016). The
current request will continue
previously-cleared efforts to evaluate
process and impacts of follow-up
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:37 Jun 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
services provided to suicidal
individuals through the National
Suicide Prevention Lifeline Crisis
Center Follow-Up (NSPL Follow-Up)
program.
The NSPL, or Lifeline, is SAMHSA’s
24-hour crisis hotline (1–800–273–
TALK [8255]) that serves as a central
switchboard, seamlessly connecting
callers from anywhere in the U.S. to the
closest of its 165 crisis centers within
the Lifeline network. Since its
inception, the Lifeline has helped more
than 6 million people. In 2008,
SAMHSA launched the NSPL Followup program and began awarding
cooperative agreements to crisis centers
in the Lifeline network to reconnect
with suicidal callers to offer emotional
support and ensure they followed up
with referrals to treatment. In 2013, the
program was expanded to include crisis
center follow-up with any suicidal
individual referred from a partnering
emergency department (ED) or inpatient
hospital.
While previous evaluations of the
NSPL demonstrated that suicidal callers
experienced a reduction in hopelessness
and suicidal intent after contacting the
Lifeline, 43% of suicidal callers
participating in follow-up assessments
reported some recurrence of suicidality
(e.g., ideation, plan, or attempt) since
their crisis call (Gould et al., 2007).
Even so, only about 35% of suicidal
callers set up an appointment and even
fewer had been seen by the behavioral
health care system to which they were
referred (Gould et al., 2007; Kalafat et
al., 2007). Similarly, while several
randomized, controlled trials have
demonstrated that following up by
telephone or letter with patients
discharged from inpatient or ED settings
can reduce rates of repeat suicide
attempts (Vaiva et al., 2006), as well as
completions (Fleischman et al., 2008;
Motto & Bostrom, 2001), suicidal
individuals discharged from EDs rarely
link to ongoing care. As many as 70%
of suicide attempters either never attend
their first appointment or drop out of
treatment after a few sessions (Knesper
et al., 2010). Thus, it is imperative that
EDs and inpatient settings link these
individuals to follow-up care.
SAMHSA is addressing this need
through the NSPL Follow-Up program.
The Monitoring of the NSPL will
continue to assess whether the NSPL
Follow-Up program achieves its
intended goals. This revision of the
Monitoring of the NSPL represents
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
40337
SAMHSA’s desire to expand this
process and impacts evaluation to assess
follow-up with clients referred to the
Lifeline from partnering inpatient
hospitals and EDs and continue to
improve the methods and standards of
service delivery to suicidal individuals
receiving crisis center services. This
effort will build on information
collected through previous and ongoing
NSPL evaluations; expand our
understanding of the outcomes
associated with the NSPL Follow-Up
program; and continue to contribute to
the evidence base.
This revision requests approval for
the removal of one previously-approved
instrument and the continuation and
renaming of five previously-approved
activities. Six crisis centers funded
through the NSPL Follow-Up program
in FY 2016 will participate in this effort.
Instrument Removal
Due to the completion of the
motivational interviewing/safety
planning (MI/SP) training and the
fulfillment of data collection goals, the
currently-approved MI/SP Counselor
Attitudes Questionnaire and its
associated burden will be removed.
Instrument and Consent Revisions
Each of the five instruments and
consents associated with the Monitoring
of the NSPL was previously approved
by OMB (No. 0930–0274; Expiration,
July 31, 2016). Revisions include the
following: (1) The term ‘‘caller’’ will be
replaced with ‘‘client’’ to reflect the
change in respondent type to clients
referred from partnering EDs and
inpatient hospitals rather than callers,
and (2) MI/SP will be removed from the
titles of all instruments and consents.
No other changes are being made.
D The MI/SP Caller Follow-up
Interview will be renamed ‘‘Client
Follow-up Interview.’’
D The MI/SP Caller Initial Script will
be renamed ‘‘Client Initial Script.’’
D The MI/SP Caller Follow-up
Consent Script will be renamed ‘‘Client
Follow-up Consent Script.’’
D The MI/SP Counselor Follow-up
Questionnaire will be renamed
‘‘Counselor Follow-up Questionnaire.’’
D The MI/SP Counselor Consent will
be renamed ‘‘Counselor Consent.’’
The estimated response burden to
collect this information associated with
the Monitoring of the NSPL annualized
over the requested 3-year approval
period is presented below:
E:\FR\FM\21JNN1.SGM
21JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 21, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40335-40337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14586]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request
Periodically, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) will publish a summary of information
collection requests under OMB review, in compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). To request a copy of these
documents, call the SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer on (240) 276-1243.
Project: Opioid Drugs in Maintenance and Detoxification Treatment of
Opioid Dependence--42 CFR Part 8 (OMB No. 0930-0206) and Opioid
Treatment Programs (OTPs)--Revision
42 CFR part 8 establishes a certification program managed by
SAMHSA's Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT). The regulation
requires that Opioid Treatment Programs (OTPs) be certified.
``Certification'' is the process by which SAMHSA determines that an OTP
is qualified to provide opioid treatment under the Federal opioid
treatment standards established by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services. To become certified, an OTP must be accredited by a SAMHSA-
approved accreditation body. The regulation also provides standards for
such services as individualized treatment planning, increased medical
supervision, and assessment of patient outcomes. This submission seeks
continued approval of the information collection requirements in the
regulation and of the forms used in implementing the regulation.
SAMHSA currently has approval for the Application for Certification
to Use Opioid Drugs in a Treatment Program Under 42 CFR 8.11 (Form SMA-
162); the Application for Approval as Accreditation Body Under 42 CFR
8.3(b) (Form SMA-163); and the Exception Request and Record of
Justification Under 42 CFR 8.12 (Form SMA-168), which may be used by
physicians when there is a patient care situation in which the
physician must make a treatment decision that differs from the
treatment regimen required by the regulation. Form SMA-168 is a
simplified, standardized form to facilitate the documentation, request,
and approval process for exceptions.
SAMHSA believes that the recordkeeping requirements in the
regulation are customary and usual practices within the medical and
rehabilitative communities and has not calculated a response burden for
them. The recordkeeping requirements set forth in 42 CFR 8.4, 8.11, and
8.12 include maintenance of the following: 5-year retention by
accreditation bodies of certain records pertaining to accreditation,
and documentation by an OTP of the following: A patient's medical
examination when admitted to treatment, a patient's history, a
treatment plan, any prenatal support provided to the patient,
justification of unusually large initial doses, changes in a patient's
dosage schedule, justification of unusually large daily doses, the
rationale for decreasing a patient's clinic attendance, and
documentation of physiologic dependence.
The rule also includes requirements that OTPs and accreditation
organizations disclose information. For example, 42 CFR 8.12(e)(1)
requires that a physician explain the facts concerning the use of
opioid drug treatment to each patient. This type of disclosure is
considered to be consistent with the common medical practice and is not
considered an additional burden. Further, the rule requires, under
section 8.4(i)(1) that accreditation organizations shall make public
their fee structure; this type of disclosure is standard business
practice and is not considered a burden.
A number of changes have been made to the forms. Forms have been
reworded for clarification, updated with current SAMHSA mailing and
web-submission information, and a few additional fields have been
provided for clarity and for providers to best explain their services
(e.g., expanding the former global patient census in the SMA-162 to
request patient census by drug type--methadone, buprenorphine,
naltrexone, or other) and the needs of their patients (e.g., including
urinalysis results on the SMA-168 and adding ``weather crisis'' as a
standard option for physician justification of the requested
exception). Amendments also include the removal of information
pertaining to faxing the forms to SAMHSA, as this is no longer an
acceptable form of submission. The burden hours have increased slightly
(by 28% or approximately 639 hours) due to an increase in the number of
facilities accredited and certified by SAMHSA since the previous
submissions of these forms. The forms are available online with a
unique feature for both the SMA-162 and SMA-168 that pre-populates
certain information within the form. This in turn reduces the program's
time spent
[[Page 40336]]
filling out the forms as well as the staff time spent on processing it.
The tables that follow summarize the annual reporting burden
associated with the regulation, including burden associated with the
forms.
Estimated Annual Reporting Requirement Burden for Accreditation Bodies
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses/ Total Hours/
42 CFR Citation Purpose respondents respondent responses response Total hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.3(b)(1-11).......................... Initial approval (SMA-163)...... 1 1 1 6.00 6.00
8.3(c)................................ Renewal of approval (SMA-163)... 2 1 2 1.00 2.00
8.3(e)................................ Relinquishment notification..... 1 1 1 0.50 0.50
8.3(f)(2)............................. Non-renewal notification to 1 90 90 0.10 9.00
accredited OTPs.
8.4(b)(1)(ii)......................... Notification to SAMHSA for 2 2 4 1.00 4.00
seriously noncompliant OTPs.
8.4(b)(1)(iii)........................ Notification to OTP for serious 2 10 20 1.00 20.00
noncompliance.
8.4(d)(1)............................. General documents and 6 5 30 0.50 15.00
information to SAMHSA upon
request.
8.4(d)(2)............................. Accreditation survey to SAMHSA 6 75 450 0.02 9.00
upon request.
8.4(d)(3)............................. List of surveys, surveyors to 6 6 36 0.20 7.20
SAMHSA upon request.
8.4(d)(4)............................. Report of less than full 6 5 30 0.50 15.00
accreditation to SAMHSA.
8.4(d)(5)............................. Summaries of Inspections........ 6 50 300 0.50 150.00
8.4(e)................................ Notifications of Complaints..... 12 6 72 0.50 36.00
8.6(a)(2) and (b)(3).................. Revocation notification to 1 185 185 0.30 55.50
Accredited OTPs.
8.6(b)................................ Submission of 90-day corrective 1 1 1 10.00 10.00
plan to SAMHSA.
8.6(b)(1)............................. Notification to accredited OTPs 1 185 185 0.30 55.50
of Probationary Status.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal.......................... ................................ 54 .............. 1,407 .............. 394.70
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Annual Reporting Requirement Burden for Opioid Treatment Programs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses/ Total Hours/
42 CFR Citation Purpose respondents respondent responses response Total hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.11(b)............................... Renewal of approval (SMA-162)... 386 1 386 0.15 57.90
8.11(b)............................... Relocation of Program (SMA-162). 35 1 35 1.17 40.95
8.11(e)(1)............................ Application for provisional 42 1 42 1.00 42.00
certification.
8.11(e)(2)............................ Application for extension of 30 1 30 0.25 7.50
provisional certification.
8.11(f)(5)............................ Notification of sponsor or 60 1 60 0.10 6.00
medical director change (SMA-
162).
8.11(g)(2)............................ Documentation to SAMHSA for 1 1 1 1.00 1.00
interim maintenance.
8.11(h)............................... Request to SAMHSA for Exemption 1,325 25 33,125 0.07 2,318.75
from 8.11 and 8.12 (including
SMA-168).
8.11(i)(1)............................ Notification to SAMHSA Before 10 1 10 0.25 2.50
Establishing Medication Units
(SMA-162).
8.12(j)(2)............................ Notification to State Health 1 20 20 0.33 6.60
Officer When Patient Begins
Interim Maintenance.
8.24.................................. Contents of Appellant Request 2 1 2 0.25 .50
for Review of Suspension.
8.25(a)............................... Informal Review Request......... 2 1 2 1.00 2.00
8.26(a)............................... Appellant's Review File and 2 1 2 5.00 10.00
Written Statement.
8.28(a)............................... Appellant's Request for 2 1 2 1.00 2.00
Expedited Review.
8.28(c)............................... Appellant Review File and 2 1 2 5.00 10.00
Written Statement.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal.......................... ................................ 1,900 .............. 33,719 .............. 2,507.70
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................... ................................ 1,954 .............. 35,126 .............. 2,902.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 40337]]
Written comments and recommendations concerning the proposed
information collection should be sent by July 21, 2016 to the SAMHSA
Desk Officer at the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). To ensure timely receipt of
comments, and to avoid potential delays in OMB's receipt and processing
of mail sent through the U.S. Postal Service, commenters are encouraged
to submit their comments to OMB via email to:
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. Although commenters are encouraged to send
their comments via email, commenters may also fax their comments to:
202-395-7285. Commenters may also mail them to: Office of Management
and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, New Executive
Office Building, Room 10102, Washington, DC 20503.
Summer King,
Statistician.
[FR Doc. 2016-14586 Filed 6-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P