Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 40201-40203 [2016-14430]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
annual meeting or in a written report
sent to all members.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Revise § 705.10 to read as follows:
§ 705.10
Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
ACTION:
Appeals.
(a) Appeals of non-qualification. A
Qualifying Credit Union whose
application for a loan or technical
assistance grant has been denied, under
§ 705.7(f), for failure of a qualification
may appeal that decision to the NCUA
Board in accordance with the following:
(1) Within thirty days of its receipt of
a notice of non-qualification, a credit
union may appeal the decision to the
NCUA Board. The scope of the NCUA
Board’s review is limited to the
threshold question of qualification and
not the issue of whether, among
qualified applicants, a particular loan or
technical assistance grant is funded.
(2) The foregoing procedure shall
apply only with respect to Applications
received by NCUA during an open
period in which funds are available and
NCUA has called for Applications. Any
Application submitted by an applicant
during a period in which NCUA has not
called for Applications will be rejected,
except for those Applications submitted
under § 705.8. Any such rejection shall
not be subject to appeal or review by the
NCUA Board.
(b) Appeals of technical assistance
grant reimbursement denials. Pursuant
to NCUA Interpretative Ruling and
Policy Statement 11–1, any Participating
Credit Union may appeal a denial of a
technical assistance grant
reimbursement to NCUA’s Supervisory
Review Committee. All appeals of
technical assistance grant
reimbursements must be submitted to
the Supervisory Review Committee
within 30 days from the date of the
denial. The decisions of the Supervisory
Review Committee are final and may
not be appealed to the NCUA Board.
[FR Doc. 2016–14718 Filed 6–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–7264; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–185–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 Jun 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A330–200, –200
Freighter, and –300 series airplanes; and
Model A340–500 and –600 series
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a quality control review on
the final assembly line, which
determined that the wrong aluminum
alloy was used to manufacture several
structural parts. This proposed AD
would require a one-time eddy current
conductivity measurement of certain
cabin and cargo compartment structural
parts to determine if an incorrect
aluminum alloy was used, and
replacement of any affected part with a
serviceable part. We are proposing this
AD to detect and replace structural parts
made of incorrect aluminum alloy. This
condition could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAL, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36
96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330–A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
7264; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40201
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1138;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2016–7264; Directorate Identifier
2015–NM–185–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2015–0206, dated October 12,
2015 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for certain Airbus
Model A330–200, –200 Freighter, and
–300 series airplanes; and Model A340–
500 and –600 series airplanes. The
MCAI states:
Following an Airbus quality control review
on the final assembly line, it was discovered
that wrong aluminum alloy was used to
manufacture several structural parts.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could reduce the structural
integrity of the aeroplane.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
Airbus issued Service Bulletin (SB) A330–
53–3261, SB A330–53–3262, and SB A340–
53–5072, as applicable to aeroplane type, to
provide instructions to identify the affected
parts.
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
40202
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires a one-time Special
Detailed Inspection (SDI) [eddy current
conductivity measurements] of certain cabin
and/or cargo compartment parts for material
identification and, depending on findings,
replacement with serviceable parts.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
7264.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed the following service
information:
• Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–
3261, including Appendixes 01, 02, and
03, dated June 23, 2015.
• Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–
3262, including Appendixes 01 and 02,
dated June 23, 2015.
• Airbus Service Bulletin A340–53–
5072, including Appendixes 01 and 02,
dated June 23, 2015.
The service information describes
procedures for a one-time eddy current
conductivity measurement of certain
cabin and cargo compartment structural
parts to determine if an incorrect
aluminum alloy was used, and
replacement of any affected part with a
serviceable part. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of these same
type designs.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 37 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 11 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on
these figures, we estimate the cost of
this proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $34,595, or $935 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any oncondition repairs would take about 45
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 Jun 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
work-hours and would require parts
costing $0, for a cost of $3,825 per
product. We have no way of
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these repairs.
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this proposed AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, we have included all available
costs in our cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2016–7264;
Directorate Identifier 2015–NM–185–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 5,
2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes
identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of
this AD, certificated in any category.
(1) Airbus Model A330–201, –202, –203,
–223, –223F, –243, –243F, –301, –302, –303,
–321, –322, –323, –341, –342, and –343
airplanes, having manufacturer serial
numbers identified in Airbus Service
Bulletin A330–53–3261, dated June 23, 2015;
and/or Airbus Service Bulletin A330–53–
3262, dated June 23, 2015.
(2) Airbus Model A340–541 and –642
airplanes, manufacturer serial numbers 1030,
1040, 1079, 1091, 1102, and 1122.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a quality control
review on the final assembly line, which
determined that the wrong aluminum alloy
was used to manufacture several structural
parts. We are issuing this AD to detect and
replace structural parts made of incorrect
aluminum alloy. This condition could result
in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) One-time Measurement
Within 6 years after the effective date of
this AD, but not exceeding 12 years since the
date of issuance of the original certificate of
airworthiness or the date of issuance of the
original export certificate of airworthiness:
Do a one-time eddy current conductivity
measurement of the cabin and cargo
compartment structural parts identified in
the ‘‘Affected Part Number’’ column of table
1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD to
determine if an incorrect aluminum alloy
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 119 / Tuesday, June 21, 2016 / Proposed Rules
was used, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service information identified in
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD.
(1) For cargo compartment structural parts
for Model A330 airplanes: Airbus Service
Bulletin A330–53–3261, including
Appendixes 01, 02, and 03, dated June 23,
2015.
(2) For cabin structural parts for Model
A330 airplanes: Airbus Service Bulletin
A330–53–3262, including Appendixes 01
and 02, dated June 23, 2015.
(3) For cargo compartment structural parts
for Model A340 airplanes: Airbus Service
Bulletin A340–53–5072, including
Appendixes 01 and 02, dated June 23, 2015.
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPHS (g) AND (h)
OF THIS AD—PARTS TO BE INSPECTED/INSTALLED
Affected part No.
Acceptable
replacement
part No.
Area
F5347126620600
F5347126621000
F5347170420400
F5347170420600
F5377004320300
F5397096620200
G5367131300000
G5367173700000
G5367173800000
F5347126620000
F5347126620400
F5347170420400
F5347170420600
F5377004320051
F5397096620200
G5367131300000
G5367173700000
G5367173800000
Cabin
Cabin
Cargo
Cargo
Cargo
Cargo
Cargo
Cargo
Cargo
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Replacement
If during the inspection required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, any affected part
having a part number specified in table 1 to
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD is found to
have a measured value greater than that
specified in Figure A–GFAAA, Sheet 02,
‘‘Inspection Flowchart,’’ of the applicable
service information identified in paragraphs
(g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD: Before
further flight, replace with an acceptable
replacement part having a part number
specified in table 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h)
of this AD, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service information identified in
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane
Directorate, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN:
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone 425–227–1138; fax 425–227–1149.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 Jun 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office. The AMOC approval letter
must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM–
116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any
service information contains procedures or
tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2015–0206, dated
October 12, 2015, for related information.
This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2016–7264.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office—EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email
airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may
view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 9,
2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–14430 Filed 6–20–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
40203
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–7415; Directorate
Identifier 2015–SW–076–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Airbus
Helicopters) Model MBB–BK 117 C–2
and MBB–BK 117 D–2 helicopters. This
proposed AD would require repetitive
visual inspections and a one-time torque
of each hydraulic module plate
assembly attachment point (attachment
point). This proposed AD is prompted
by a design reassessment showing the
current attachment point design is
insufficient in preventing an attachment
point failure. The proposed actions are
intended to prevent failure of an
attachment point, loss of the hydraulic
module plate, and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by August 22, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
7415; or in person at the Docket
Operations Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD, the economic evaluation,
any comments received, and other
E:\FR\FM\21JNP1.SGM
21JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 21, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 40201-40203]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14430]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-7264; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-185-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series
airplanes; and Model A340-500 and -600 series airplanes. This proposed
AD was prompted by a quality control review on the final assembly line,
which determined that the wrong aluminum alloy was used to manufacture
several structural parts. This proposed AD would require a one-time
eddy current conductivity measurement of certain cabin and cargo
compartment structural parts to determine if an incorrect aluminum
alloy was used, and replacement of any affected part with a serviceable
part. We are proposing this AD to detect and replace structural parts
made of incorrect aluminum alloy. This condition could result in
reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus
SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45
80; email airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
7264; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1138;
fax 425-227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-7264;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-185-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2015-0206, dated October 12, 2015 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model
A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes; and Model A340-500
and -600 series airplanes. The MCAI states:
Following an Airbus quality control review on the final assembly
line, it was discovered that wrong aluminum alloy was used to
manufacture several structural parts.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could reduce the
structural integrity of the aeroplane.
To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus issued
Service Bulletin (SB) A330-53-3261, SB A330-53-3262, and SB A340-53-
5072, as applicable to aeroplane type, to provide instructions to
identify the affected parts.
[[Page 40202]]
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires a one-
time Special Detailed Inspection (SDI) [eddy current conductivity
measurements] of certain cabin and/or cargo compartment parts for
material identification and, depending on findings, replacement with
serviceable parts.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
7264.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed the following service information:
Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3261, including Appendixes
01, 02, and 03, dated June 23, 2015.
Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3262, including Appendixes
01 and 02, dated June 23, 2015.
Airbus Service Bulletin A340-53-5072, including Appendixes
01 and 02, dated June 23, 2015.
The service information describes procedures for a one-time eddy
current conductivity measurement of certain cabin and cargo compartment
structural parts to determine if an incorrect aluminum alloy was used,
and replacement of any affected part with a serviceable part. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 37 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We also estimate that it would take about 11 work-hours per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $34,595, or $935
per product.
In addition, we estimate that any on-condition repairs would take
about 45 work-hours and would require parts costing $0, for a cost of
$3,825 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these repairs.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all available costs in our
cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2016-7264; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-
185-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by August 5, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category.
(1) Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, -243F,
-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes,
having manufacturer serial numbers identified in Airbus Service
Bulletin A330-53-3261, dated June 23, 2015; and/or Airbus Service
Bulletin A330-53-3262, dated June 23, 2015.
(2) Airbus Model A340-541 and -642 airplanes, manufacturer
serial numbers 1030, 1040, 1079, 1091, 1102, and 1122.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a quality control review on the final
assembly line, which determined that the wrong aluminum alloy was
used to manufacture several structural parts. We are issuing this AD
to detect and replace structural parts made of incorrect aluminum
alloy. This condition could result in reduced structural integrity
of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) One-time Measurement
Within 6 years after the effective date of this AD, but not
exceeding 12 years since the date of issuance of the original
certificate of airworthiness or the date of issuance of the original
export certificate of airworthiness: Do a one-time eddy current
conductivity measurement of the cabin and cargo compartment
structural parts identified in the ``Affected Part Number'' column
of table 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD to determine if an
incorrect aluminum alloy
[[Page 40203]]
was used, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service information identified in paragraphs (g)(1),
(g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD.
(1) For cargo compartment structural parts for Model A330
airplanes: Airbus Service Bulletin A330-53-3261, including
Appendixes 01, 02, and 03, dated June 23, 2015.
(2) For cabin structural parts for Model A330 airplanes: Airbus
Service Bulletin
A330-53-3262, including Appendixes 01 and 02, dated June 23,
2015.
(3) For cargo compartment structural parts for Model A340
airplanes: Airbus Service Bulletin A340-53-5072, including
Appendixes 01 and 02, dated June 23, 2015.
Table 1 to Paragraphs (g) and (h) of This AD--Parts To Be Inspected/
Installed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acceptable
Affected part No. replacement part Area
No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
F5347126620600.................. F5347126620000.... Cabin
F5347126621000.................. F5347126620400.... Cabin
F5347170420400.................. F5347170420400.... Cargo
F5347170420600.................. F5347170420600.... Cargo
F5377004320300.................. F5377004320051.... Cargo
F5397096620200.................. F5397096620200.... Cargo
G5367131300000.................. G5367131300000.... Cargo
G5367173700000.................. G5367173700000.... Cargo
G5367173800000.................. G5367173800000.... Cargo
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(h) Replacement
If during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
any affected part having a part number specified in table 1 to
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD is found to have a measured value
greater than that specified in Figure A-GFAAA, Sheet 02,
``Inspection Flowchart,'' of the applicable service information
identified in paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD:
Before further flight, replace with an acceptable replacement part
having a part number specified in table 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h)
of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
the applicable service information identified in paragraphs (g)(1),
(g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1138; fax 425-227-1149. Information
may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2015-0206, dated October 12,
2015, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-7264.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email airworthiness.A330-A340@airbus.com;
Internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 9, 2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-14430 Filed 6-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P