Correction to Applicability Date for Modification of Regulations Regarding Price Adjustments in Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 39873-39874 [2016-14427]
Download as PDF
39873
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 118
Monday, June 20, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
19 CFR Part 351
[Docket No. 140929814–4814–01]
RIN 0625–AB02
Correction to Applicability Date for
Modification of Regulations Regarding
Price Adjustments in Antidumping
Duty Proceedings
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(the Department) proposes to modify the
applicability date contained in the final
rule published in the Federal Register
on March 24, 2016, Modification of
Regulations Regarding Price
Adjustments in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings, 81 FR 15641, and is
seeking comments from parties. The
original applicability date language did
not convey the Department’s intention,
i.e., to apply the newly amended
regulation to all segments of
proceedings initiated on or after the
effective date contained in the Federal
Register notice. This action is necessary
to ensure that there is no ambiguity in
the application of the modified
regulations.
SUMMARY:
To be assured of consideration,
written comments must be received no
later than July 5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: All comments must be
submitted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov, Docket No. ITA–
2016–003, unless the commenter does
not have access to the internet.
Commenters that do not have access to
the internet may submit the original and
one electronic copy on CD–ROM of each
set of comments by mail or hand
delivery/courier. All comments should
be addressed to Paul Piquado, Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement &
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 Jun 17, 2016
Jkt 238001
Compliance, Room 18022, Department
of Commerce, 14th Street and
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
20230. Comments submitted directly to
the Department will be uploaded to the
eRulemaking Portal at
www.Regulations.gov.
The Department will consider all
comments received before the close of
the comment period. All comments
responding to this notice will be a
matter of public record and will be
available on the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at www.Regulations.gov. The
Department will not accept comments
accompanied by a request that part or
all of the material be treated
confidentially because of its business
proprietary nature or for any other
reason.
Any questions concerning file
formatting, document conversion,
access on the Internet, or other
electronic filing issues should be
addressed to Moustapha Sylla,
Enforcement and Compliance
Webmaster, at (202) 482–4685, email
address: webmaster-support@
ita.doc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jessica Link at (202) 482–1411.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March
24, 2016, the Department published a
final rule in the Federal Register
modifying 19 CFR 351.102(b)(38) and 19
CFR 351.401(c). Modification of
Regulations Regarding Price
Adjustments in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings, 81 FR 15641 (March 24,
2016) (Final Rule). The Dates section of
the Final Rule states: ‘‘Effective date:
April 25, 2016. Applicability date: This
rule will apply to all proceedings
initiated on or after April 25, 2016.’’
The applicability date does not
convey the Department’s intention, i.e.,
to apply the newly amended regulations
to all segments of proceedings initiated
on or after the effective date of the Final
Rule. Although ‘‘proceedings’’ can be
interpreted generally to include any
segment of an administrative case before
Enforcement and Compliance that is
initiated on or after the effective date,
‘‘proceeding’’ and ‘‘segment of
proceeding’’ are defined separately in 19
CFR 351.102(b)(40) and 19 CFR
351.102(b)(47), respectively. To avoid
any ambiguity and to clarify the
Department’s intent, the applicability
date is being modified such that the
Final Rule will apply to segments of
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proceedings initiated on or after 30 days
following the publication date of the
final rule that results from this
rulemaking. As the prior applicability
date was not included in the modified
regulations, 19 CFR 351.102(b)(38) and
19 CFR 351.401(c), the Department is
not proposing to amend its regulations.
The only change to the Final Rule being
addressed in this proposed rule and
request for comment is a change to the
applicability date of the Final Rule. In
addition, because the Department is
merely clarifying its intent with respect
to the applicability date of the Final
Rule, and is not altering the substance
of the Final Rule in any way, we are
providing parties with 15 days to
comment on this proposed rule.
Although one commenter commented
on the effective date of the Final Rule,
that comment related to which entries
would be subject to the Final Rule. We
disagreed with the commenter that it
would be unfair to apply the rule to
entries made prior to the effective date
of the Final Rule. 81 FR at 15645. We
addressed the entry comment but
inadvertently failed to ensure that the
applicability date read ‘‘segments of
proceedings’’ rather than ‘‘proceedings’’
in the Final Rule.
Classification
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this
proposed rule is not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no new
collection of information subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule does not contain
policies with federalism implications as
that term is defined in section 1(a) of
Executive Order 13132, dated August 4,
1999 (64 FR 43255 (August 10, 1999)).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation has
certified to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration under the provisions of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C.
605(b), that this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
business entities. This proposed rule
E:\FR\FM\20JNP1.SGM
20JNP1
39874
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 118 / Monday, June 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules
merely corrects the applicability date of
the Final Rule, Modification of
Regulations Regarding Price
Adjustments in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings, 81 FR 15641 (March 24,
2016), which entailed a substantive
change in the Department’s regulations,
and for which it was determined that
there would be no significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. As a result, this proposed
correction of the applicability date of
the Final Rule similarly would not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. For
this reason, an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis is not required and
one has not been prepared.
Dated: June 13, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–14427 Filed 6–17–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 15
43 CFR Part 30
[167A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
Probate Regulation Updates
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Tribal consultation.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Interior (‘‘Department’’) plans to
conduct two Tribal consultation
sessions with federally recognized
Tribes across the country. These
meetings will provide a forum for Tribes
to share insights and make
recommendations related to the probate
of Indian estates.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by August 1, 2016. Please see
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this notice for dates of Tribal
consultation sessions.
SUMMARY:
Date
2:00 p.m.–4:00 p.m ...............................
2:00 p.m.–4:00 p.m ...............................
The Department will also be hosting
a listening session on Monday, June 27,
in Spokane, Washington, in conjunction
with the National Congress of American
Indians mid-year conference. The
Department will accept written
comments received by the date listed in
the DATES section of this notice.
As described below, we have
identified three areas for modification
that will have an immediate impact in
streamlining the probate process. We are
seeking comments with regard to the
following topics, and welcome insight
on other aspects of the probate
regulatory framework that could be
improved.
Probate Revisions Currently Under
Consideration
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs and Collaborative
Action, Office of the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs; telephone
(202) 273–4680, elizabeth.appel@
bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Tribal Consultation Sessions
The Department will be hosting two
Tribal consultation sessions by
teleconference. Tribes were notified of
these consultation sessions by letter on
June 8, 2016. The sessions are:
Time
(eastern time)
Tuesday, July 12, 2016 ..........................
Wednesday, July 13, 2016 .....................
You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
• Email: consultation@bia.gov.
• By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
or hand delivery to: Ms. Elizabeth
Appel, Office of Regulatory Affairs and
Collaborative Action, U.S. Department
of the Interior, 1849 C Street NW., MS–
3071–MIB, Washington, DC 20240.
Please see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice for
information on the Tribal consultation
sessions.
ADDRESSES:
1. Increasing the Monetary Limit for
Distribution of IIM Account Funds to
Pay for Funeral Services From $1,000 to
$5,000
The regulation, at 25 CFR 15.301
currently establishes a monetary limit of
$1,000 for distribution of Individual
Indian Money (IIM) account funds to
pay for funeral expenses. There is an
ongoing concern that $1,000 is not
sufficient to pay for funeral expenses.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:01 Jun 17, 2016
Jkt 238001
Location
Call-in Number: (800) 857–7479 Passcode: 6543434
Call-in Number: (800) 857–7479 Passcode: 6543434
While individuals may submit funeral
related claims to be paid from estate
account funds at any time before the
conclusion of the first hearing by the
Office of Hearings and Appeals (OHA),
the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is
aware that family members sometimes
suffer financial hardship and lengthy
delays as the estate is finalized and
claims are approved.
Revisions under consideration:
• The BIA is considering a
modification to this subpart that would
increase the amount of funds available
to use for funeral expenses. One
proposed modification would amend
current regulations by increasing the
amount an individual my request from
the decedent’s IIM to no more than
$5,000 for funeral expenses. The
account must still contain a minimum
balance of $2,500 in order to approve an
expense under this section.
• In the interests of preserving estate
account funds for heirs and other
claimants, an alternative option would
be to likewise raise the maximum
payout to $5,000, but with the limitation
that the total payments could not exceed
40% of the available account balance.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2. Allowing BIA To Make Minor Estate
Inventory Corrections
The current regulation, at 43 CFR
30.126, requires a judge to issue a
modification order if trust or restricted
property belonging to a decedent is
omitted from the inventory of an estate.
As a result, it can take significant time
to make minor estate inventory
corrections to include omitted property.
Revision under consideration:
• The BIA is considering a regulatory
modification to grant the BIA the
authority to make estate inventory
modifications when heirship has
already been determined by an OHA
order. The BIA would notify all
interested parties to an estate in the
event property interests were to be
added. As in this current regulatory
section, any modification that would
result in property taking a different line
of descent would still require OHA
issuing a decision to re-determine heirs.
For example, if adding property to a
decedent’s estate would cause that
interest to become 5% or more of the
parcel, and thus no longer subject to the
American Indian Probate Reform Act’s
highly fractionated interest provisions,
OHA would need to issue a new
E:\FR\FM\20JNP1.SGM
20JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 118 (Monday, June 20, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39873-39874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14427]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 118 / Monday, June 20, 2016 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 39873]]
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
19 CFR Part 351
[Docket No. 140929814-4814-01]
RIN 0625-AB02
Correction to Applicability Date for Modification of Regulations
Regarding Price Adjustments in Antidumping Duty Proceedings
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) proposes to modify
the applicability date contained in the final rule published in the
Federal Register on March 24, 2016, Modification of Regulations
Regarding Price Adjustments in Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 81 FR
15641, and is seeking comments from parties. The original applicability
date language did not convey the Department's intention, i.e., to apply
the newly amended regulation to all segments of proceedings initiated
on or after the effective date contained in the Federal Register
notice. This action is necessary to ensure that there is no ambiguity
in the application of the modified regulations.
DATES: To be assured of consideration, written comments must be
received no later than July 5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: All comments must be submitted through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov, Docket No. ITA-2016-
003, unless the commenter does not have access to the internet.
Commenters that do not have access to the internet may submit the
original and one electronic copy on CD-ROM of each set of comments by
mail or hand delivery/courier. All comments should be addressed to Paul
Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & Compliance, Room 18022,
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20230. Comments submitted directly to the Department
will be uploaded to the eRulemaking Portal at www.Regulations.gov.
The Department will consider all comments received before the close
of the comment period. All comments responding to this notice will be a
matter of public record and will be available on the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at www.Regulations.gov. The Department will not
accept comments accompanied by a request that part or all of the
material be treated confidentially because of its business proprietary
nature or for any other reason.
Any questions concerning file formatting, document conversion,
access on the Internet, or other electronic filing issues should be
addressed to Moustapha Sylla, Enforcement and Compliance Webmaster, at
(202) 482-4685, email address: webmaster-support@ita.doc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jessica Link at (202) 482-1411.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 24, 2016, the Department published
a final rule in the Federal Register modifying 19 CFR 351.102(b)(38)
and 19 CFR 351.401(c). Modification of Regulations Regarding Price
Adjustments in Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 81 FR 15641 (March 24,
2016) (Final Rule). The Dates section of the Final Rule states:
``Effective date: April 25, 2016. Applicability date: This rule will
apply to all proceedings initiated on or after April 25, 2016.''
The applicability date does not convey the Department's intention,
i.e., to apply the newly amended regulations to all segments of
proceedings initiated on or after the effective date of the Final Rule.
Although ``proceedings'' can be interpreted generally to include any
segment of an administrative case before Enforcement and Compliance
that is initiated on or after the effective date, ``proceeding'' and
``segment of proceeding'' are defined separately in 19 CFR
351.102(b)(40) and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(47), respectively. To avoid any
ambiguity and to clarify the Department's intent, the applicability
date is being modified such that the Final Rule will apply to segments
of proceedings initiated on or after 30 days following the publication
date of the final rule that results from this rulemaking. As the prior
applicability date was not included in the modified regulations, 19 CFR
351.102(b)(38) and 19 CFR 351.401(c), the Department is not proposing
to amend its regulations. The only change to the Final Rule being
addressed in this proposed rule and request for comment is a change to
the applicability date of the Final Rule. In addition, because the
Department is merely clarifying its intent with respect to the
applicability date of the Final Rule, and is not altering the substance
of the Final Rule in any way, we are providing parties with 15 days to
comment on this proposed rule.
Although one commenter commented on the effective date of the Final
Rule, that comment related to which entries would be subject to the
Final Rule. We disagreed with the commenter that it would be unfair to
apply the rule to entries made prior to the effective date of the Final
Rule. 81 FR at 15645. We addressed the entry comment but inadvertently
failed to ensure that the applicability date read ``segments of
proceedings'' rather than ``proceedings'' in the Final Rule.
Classification
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this proposed rule is not significant
for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no new collection of information
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule does not contain policies with federalism
implications as that term is defined in section 1(a) of Executive Order
13132, dated August 4, 1999 (64 FR 43255 (August 10, 1999)).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Chief Counsel for Regulation has certified to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration under the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small business entities. This proposed rule
[[Page 39874]]
merely corrects the applicability date of the Final Rule, Modification
of Regulations Regarding Price Adjustments in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings, 81 FR 15641 (March 24, 2016), which entailed a substantive
change in the Department's regulations, and for which it was determined
that there would be no significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. As a result, this proposed correction of the
applicability date of the Final Rule similarly would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
For this reason, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not
required and one has not been prepared.
Dated: June 13, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-14427 Filed 6-17-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P