Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Revisions and Amendments to Regulations for Continuous Opacity Monitoring, Continuous Emissions Monitoring, and Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitors, 39605-39607 [2016-14394]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
Dated: June 3, 2016.
Mark Hague,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUMMARY:
Heather Hamilton, Environmental
Protection Agency, Air Planning and
Development Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
913–551–7039, or by email at
Hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
This
document proposes to take action to
approve the definition of greenhouse
gas, and add greenhouse gases to
emission inventory requirements. We
have published a direct final rule
approving the State’s SIP revision (s) in
the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of
this Federal Register, because we view
this as a noncontroversial action and
anticipate no relevant adverse comment.
We have explained our reasons for this
action in the preamble to the direct final
rule. If we receive no adverse comment,
we will not take further action on this
proposed rule. If we receive adverse
comment, we will withdraw the direct
final rule and it will not take effect. We
would address all public comments in
any subsequent final rule based on this
proposed rule. We do not intend to
institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time. For
further information, please see the
information provided in the ADDRESSES
section of this document.
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Greenhouse gases,
Incorporation by reference, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Jun 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
[FR Doc. 2016–14281 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0042; FRL–9947–84–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Revisions and Amendments
to Regulations for Continuous Opacity
Monitoring, Continuous Emissions
Monitoring, and Quality Assurance
Requirements for Continuous Opacity
Monitors
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
state implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of Maryland.
This revision pertains to revisions to
Maryland regulations for continuous
opacity monitoring (COM or COMs) and
continuous emissions monitoring (CEM
or CEMs) and to an amendment adding
requirements for Quality Assurance and
Quality Control (QA/QC) as they pertain
to COMs. This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before July 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2016–0042 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39605
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marilyn Powers, (215) 814–2308, or by
email at powers.marilyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 24, 2015, the State of
Maryland through the Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE)
submitted a revision to the Maryland
SIP comprised of revisions and
amendments to COMAR 26.01.01
General Administrative Requirements
related to requirements for COMs and
CEMs and the addition of new COMAR
26.01.31 Quality Assurance
Requirements for Continuous Opacity
Monitors (COMs). On February 26, 2016,
MDE provided a supplemental letter
indicating MDE was excluding portions
of COMAR 26.11.01 submitted in the
November 24, 2015 SIP submittal from
EPA’s review and consideration as a SIP
revision. The February 26, 2016 letter
from MDE is available in the docket for
this rulemaking and is available online
at https://www.regulations.gov.1
I. Background
On February 28, 1996 (61 FR 6418),
EPA approved Maryland regulation
COMAR 26.11.01.10 Continuous
Emissions Monitoring (CEM)
Requirements into the Maryland SIP.
COMAR 26.11.01.10 required large fuelburning equipment burning coal and
residual oil to install COMs and
demonstrate compliance using COM
data. The regulation established
monitoring requirements, CEM
installation requirements, CEM
installation and certification schedules,
quality assurance procedures for opacity
monitors, and recordkeeping and
reporting requirements. The regulation
incorporated by reference Maryland’s
Technical Memorandum 90–01 (TM 90),
and required compliance
determinations for the State’s visible
emissions limits and QA/QC for COMs
in accordance with the procedures
therein. The terms CEMs and COMs are
used interchangeably in COMAR
26.11.01.10, therefore MDE determined
it was necessary to establish separate
1 Specifically, in the February 26, 2016 letter from
MDE to EPA, MDE withdrew from EPA’s review
and consideration the text in COMAR
26.11.01.10.A(4), in COMAR 26.11.01.10.B(4), in
COMAR 26.11.01.10D(2)(c), and in COMAR
26.11.01.10.F which had initially been included in
the November 25, 2015 SIP submittal.
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
39606
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
requirements for each. The November
24, 2015 SIP submittal, as clarified and
amended on February 26, 2016 by MDE,
includes revisions to COMs and CEMs
definitions in COMAR 26.11.01.01, a
revised COMAR 26.11.01.10 for COMs,
a new COMAR 26.11.01.11 for CEMs,
and new COMAR 26.11.38 for QA/QC
procedures related to COMs. TM 90, as
incorporated in Maryland’s SIP,
establishes CEMs policies and
procedures for enforcement actions, and
sets forth levels of enforcement action
responses based on a source’s operating
time during a calendar quarter. It also
allows exceedances to occur up to 10
percent of a source’s operating time in
addition to an existing six minute per
hour exclusion, and established specific
enforcement actions based on a source’s
number of exceedances during the
quarter and for repeated exceedances for
consecutive calendar quarters. The
November 24, 2015 submittal, as
amended by MDE’s February 26, 2016
letter, removes the requirement to use
TM 90 for enforcement actions and for
QA/QC requirements on applicable fuelburning equipment and removes
references to TM 90.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The revision is comprised of four
State actions pertaining to adjusted
requirements for COMs and CEMs in
COMAR 26.11.01.01 and COMAR
26.11.01.10, new CEMs provisions in
COMAR 26.11.01.11, and new QA/QC
requirements in COMAR 26.11.31.
These four actions are a series of
regulatory actions that result in a
recodification of some existing
requirements for COMs and CEMs,
establishment of separate regulations
and requirements for COMs and CEMs,
removal of applicability of TM 90 for
certain fuel-burning equipment and
removal of references to TM 90, and
codification of the QA/QC requirements
for COMs that were formerly
incorporated by reference in TM 90. A
summary of MDE’s four regulatory
actions are provided in this notice.
Additional details regarding the four
actions and EPA’s analysis of the
revised regulations are provided in
EPA’s Technical Support Document
(TSD) dated April 5, 2016, and can be
found in the docket for this proposed
rulemaking action available online at
https://www.regulations.gov.
First, on April 14, 2011, MDE adopted
amendments to COMAR 26.11.01
General Administrative Requirements.
To establish separate regulations for
COMs and CEMs, the April 14, 2011
action clarified the definition for CEMs
and added a definition of COMs at
COMAR 26.11.01.01, repealed COMAR
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Jun 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
26.11.01.10 in its entirety and replaced
it with a new regulation for COMs (also
at COMAR 26.11.01.10) entitled
Continuous Opacity Monitoring
Requirements, and added new COMAR
26.11.01.11 Continuous Emissions
Monitoring Requirements. The April 14,
2011 action also made administrative
changes to reporting and recordkeeping
requirements in COMAR 26.11.01.
Revised regulation COMAR
26.11.01.10 establishes requirements for
COMs and applies to fuel-burning
equipment burning coal, fuel oil, tars, or
waste combustible fluid at any time that
has a rated heat input capacity of 250
million British thermal units (Btu) per
hour or greater, fuel burning equipment
burning coal with a rated heat input
capacity of 100 million Btu per hour or
greater but less than 250 million Btu per
hour and was constructed on or before
June 19, 1984, cement kilns, fluidized
bed combustors of any size, and
municipal waste combustors with a
burning capacity greater than 35 tons
per day. The regulation at COMAR
26.11.01.10 establishes general
requirements for installation of COMs,
certification and quality assurance
procedures, and recordkeeping and
reporting requirements. Maryland
removed the requirements for COMs on
fuel-burning equipment to meet TM 90
in this action but retained at that time
the QA/QC requirements contained in
Part II of TM 90.
New COMAR 26.01.11 requires CEMs
for fuel-burning equipment burning coal
that has a rated heat input capacity of
100 million Btu per hour or greater,
municipal waste combustors with a
burning capacity greater than 35 tons
per day, fluidized bed combustors, kraft
pulp mills, and any owner or operator
that is required to install a CEM under
any federal requirement. This new
regulation establishes general
requirements for the installation of
CEMs for each of the applicable source
categories, quality assurance provisions,
and monitoring and compliance
requirements, and retains the
applicability of TM 90.
Second, on May 16, 2011, MDE
adopted COMAR 26.11.31 Quality
Assurance Requirements for Continuous
Opacity Monitors (COMs), which
codified the QA/QC procedures from
TM 90 for COMs and incorporated by
reference two federal performance and
design specification requirements for
the operation of opacity monitoring:
Performance Specification 1 under 40
CFR part 60 Appendix B, and
Performance Audit Procedures for
Opacity Monitors, EPA 450/4–92–010
dated March 1992.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Third, on July 29, 2011, MDE adopted
revisions to the provisions of COMAR
26.11.01.10 and 26.11.01.11 that were
originally adopted on April 14, 2010.
On July 29, 2011, MDE again revised
COMAR 26.11.01.10 to correct the size
of municipal waste combustors required
to install continuous monitors (from
greater than 35 mmBtu per hour to 35
mmBtu per hour or greater), to remove
the requirement to meet TM 90 for QA/
QC procedures and replace with a
reference to the new QA/QC
requirements in COMAR 26.11.31, and
to clarify CEMs requirements regarding
pollutants to be continuously measured
for municipal waste combustors, Kraft
pulp mills, and fluidized bed
combustors. The action also added
COMAR 26.11.01.10E for recordkeeping
and reporting requirements for CEMs.
Finally, on July 29, 2011, MDE
adopted further revisions to the
provisions of COMAR 26.11.01.10 and
COMAR 26.11.01.11 to remove
remaining references to TM 90, and to
clarify that the QA/QC procedures for
COMs are now in COMAR 26.11.31.
Further EPA analysis of the revisions to
these Maryland regulations as well as
the reasons supporting EPA’s proposed
approval of these revisions are provided
in the TSD supporting this rulemaking
which can be found in the docket for
this proposed rulemaking action and is
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov.
III. Proposed Action
EPA’s review of this material
indicates that the November 24, 2015
submittal, as amended by MDE’s
February 26, 2016 letter, is in
accordance with the CAA and is
therefore approvable. Because TM 90
contains enforcement exemptions, its
removal strengthens the Maryland SIP.
EPA is proposing to approve the
Maryland SIP revision submittal which
contains revisions and amendments to
provisions for COMs and CEMs in
COMAR 26.11.01.01 and COMAR
26.11.01.10 and adds new provisions for
COMs and CEMs at COMAR 26.11.01.11
and COMAR 26.11.31. EPA is soliciting
public comments on the issues
discussed in this document. These
comments will be considered before
taking final action.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this proposed action, EPA is
proposing to include in a final EPA rule,
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference revisions to the requirements
for COMs and CEMs in Maryland
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
regulation COMAR 26.01.01 and
COMAR 26.01.31, discussed previously
in section II of this rulemaking. EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these
documents generally available
electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or may be
viewed at the appropriate EPA office
(see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Jun 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule to
approve revisions to Maryland
regulation COMAR 26.01.01 and to
approve the addition of COMAR
26.01.31 into the Maryland SIP does not
have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the state, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 27, 2016.
Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2016–14394 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 55
[EPA–R09–OAR–2004–0091; FRL–9947–72–
Region 9]
Outer Continental Shelf Air
Regulations; Consistency Update for
California
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to update a
portion of the Outer Continental Shelf
(‘‘OCS’’) Air Regulations. Requirements
applying to OCS sources located within
25 miles of States’ seaward boundaries
must be updated periodically to remain
consistent with the requirements of the
corresponding onshore area (‘‘COA’’), as
mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the
Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (‘‘the
Act’’). The portion of the OCS air
regulations that is being updated
pertains to the requirements for OCS
sources for which the Ventura County
Air Pollution Control District (‘‘Ventura
County APCD’’ or ‘‘District’’) is the
designated COA. The intended effect of
approving the OCS requirements for the
Ventura County APCD is to regulate
emissions from OCS sources in
accordance with the requirements
onshore. The changes to the existing
requirements discussed in this
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39607
document are proposed to be
incorporated by reference into the Code
of Federal Regulations and listed in the
appendix to the OCS air regulations.
Comments must be received by
July 18, 2016.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2004–0091 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office
Chief at Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be removed or edited
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine Vineyard, Air Division (Air-4),
U.S. EPA Region 9, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, (415)
947–4125, vineyard.christine@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
A. Why is the EPA taking this action?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation
A. What criteria were used to evaluate
rules submitted to update 40 CFR part
55?
B. What requirements were submitted to
update 40 CFR part 55?
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Administrative Requirements
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39605-39607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14394]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0042; FRL-9947-84-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Revisions and Amendments to Regulations for Continuous
Opacity Monitoring, Continuous Emissions Monitoring, and Quality
Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitors
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of Maryland. This revision pertains to revisions to Maryland
regulations for continuous opacity monitoring (COM or COMs) and
continuous emissions monitoring (CEM or CEMs) and to an amendment
adding requirements for Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC)
as they pertain to COMs. This action is being taken under the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2016-0042 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marilyn Powers, (215) 814-2308, or by
email at powers.marilyn@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 24, 2015, the State of Maryland
through the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) submitted a
revision to the Maryland SIP comprised of revisions and amendments to
COMAR 26.01.01 General Administrative Requirements related to
requirements for COMs and CEMs and the addition of new COMAR 26.01.31
Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitors (COMs).
On February 26, 2016, MDE provided a supplemental letter indicating MDE
was excluding portions of COMAR 26.11.01 submitted in the November 24,
2015 SIP submittal from EPA's review and consideration as a SIP
revision. The February 26, 2016 letter from MDE is available in the
docket for this rulemaking and is available online at https://www.regulations.gov.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Specifically, in the February 26, 2016 letter from MDE to
EPA, MDE withdrew from EPA's review and consideration the text in
COMAR 26.11.01.10.A(4), in COMAR 26.11.01.10.B(4), in COMAR
26.11.01.10D(2)(c), and in COMAR 26.11.01.10.F which had initially
been included in the November 25, 2015 SIP submittal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Background
On February 28, 1996 (61 FR 6418), EPA approved Maryland regulation
COMAR 26.11.01.10 Continuous Emissions Monitoring (CEM) Requirements
into the Maryland SIP. COMAR 26.11.01.10 required large fuel-burning
equipment burning coal and residual oil to install COMs and demonstrate
compliance using COM data. The regulation established monitoring
requirements, CEM installation requirements, CEM installation and
certification schedules, quality assurance procedures for opacity
monitors, and recordkeeping and reporting requirements. The regulation
incorporated by reference Maryland's Technical Memorandum 90-01 (TM
90), and required compliance determinations for the State's visible
emissions limits and QA/QC for COMs in accordance with the procedures
therein. The terms CEMs and COMs are used interchangeably in COMAR
26.11.01.10, therefore MDE determined it was necessary to establish
separate
[[Page 39606]]
requirements for each. The November 24, 2015 SIP submittal, as
clarified and amended on February 26, 2016 by MDE, includes revisions
to COMs and CEMs definitions in COMAR 26.11.01.01, a revised COMAR
26.11.01.10 for COMs, a new COMAR 26.11.01.11 for CEMs, and new COMAR
26.11.38 for QA/QC procedures related to COMs. TM 90, as incorporated
in Maryland's SIP, establishes CEMs policies and procedures for
enforcement actions, and sets forth levels of enforcement action
responses based on a source's operating time during a calendar quarter.
It also allows exceedances to occur up to 10 percent of a source's
operating time in addition to an existing six minute per hour
exclusion, and established specific enforcement actions based on a
source's number of exceedances during the quarter and for repeated
exceedances for consecutive calendar quarters. The November 24, 2015
submittal, as amended by MDE's February 26, 2016 letter, removes the
requirement to use TM 90 for enforcement actions and for QA/QC
requirements on applicable fuel-burning equipment and removes
references to TM 90.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
The revision is comprised of four State actions pertaining to
adjusted requirements for COMs and CEMs in COMAR 26.11.01.01 and COMAR
26.11.01.10, new CEMs provisions in COMAR 26.11.01.11, and new QA/QC
requirements in COMAR 26.11.31. These four actions are a series of
regulatory actions that result in a recodification of some existing
requirements for COMs and CEMs, establishment of separate regulations
and requirements for COMs and CEMs, removal of applicability of TM 90
for certain fuel-burning equipment and removal of references to TM 90,
and codification of the QA/QC requirements for COMs that were formerly
incorporated by reference in TM 90. A summary of MDE's four regulatory
actions are provided in this notice. Additional details regarding the
four actions and EPA's analysis of the revised regulations are provided
in EPA's Technical Support Document (TSD) dated April 5, 2016, and can
be found in the docket for this proposed rulemaking action available
online at https://www.regulations.gov.
First, on April 14, 2011, MDE adopted amendments to COMAR 26.11.01
General Administrative Requirements. To establish separate regulations
for COMs and CEMs, the April 14, 2011 action clarified the definition
for CEMs and added a definition of COMs at COMAR 26.11.01.01, repealed
COMAR 26.11.01.10 in its entirety and replaced it with a new regulation
for COMs (also at COMAR 26.11.01.10) entitled Continuous Opacity
Monitoring Requirements, and added new COMAR 26.11.01.11 Continuous
Emissions Monitoring Requirements. The April 14, 2011 action also made
administrative changes to reporting and recordkeeping requirements in
COMAR 26.11.01.
Revised regulation COMAR 26.11.01.10 establishes requirements for
COMs and applies to fuel-burning equipment burning coal, fuel oil,
tars, or waste combustible fluid at any time that has a rated heat
input capacity of 250 million British thermal units (Btu) per hour or
greater, fuel burning equipment burning coal with a rated heat input
capacity of 100 million Btu per hour or greater but less than 250
million Btu per hour and was constructed on or before June 19, 1984,
cement kilns, fluidized bed combustors of any size, and municipal waste
combustors with a burning capacity greater than 35 tons per day. The
regulation at COMAR 26.11.01.10 establishes general requirements for
installation of COMs, certification and quality assurance procedures,
and recordkeeping and reporting requirements. Maryland removed the
requirements for COMs on fuel-burning equipment to meet TM 90 in this
action but retained at that time the QA/QC requirements contained in
Part II of TM 90.
New COMAR 26.01.11 requires CEMs for fuel-burning equipment burning
coal that has a rated heat input capacity of 100 million Btu per hour
or greater, municipal waste combustors with a burning capacity greater
than 35 tons per day, fluidized bed combustors, kraft pulp mills, and
any owner or operator that is required to install a CEM under any
federal requirement. This new regulation establishes general
requirements for the installation of CEMs for each of the applicable
source categories, quality assurance provisions, and monitoring and
compliance requirements, and retains the applicability of TM 90.
Second, on May 16, 2011, MDE adopted COMAR 26.11.31 Quality
Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitors (COMs), which
codified the QA/QC procedures from TM 90 for COMs and incorporated by
reference two federal performance and design specification requirements
for the operation of opacity monitoring: Performance Specification 1
under 40 CFR part 60 Appendix B, and Performance Audit Procedures for
Opacity Monitors, EPA 450/4-92-010 dated March 1992.
Third, on July 29, 2011, MDE adopted revisions to the provisions of
COMAR 26.11.01.10 and 26.11.01.11 that were originally adopted on April
14, 2010. On July 29, 2011, MDE again revised COMAR 26.11.01.10 to
correct the size of municipal waste combustors required to install
continuous monitors (from greater than 35 mmBtu per hour to 35 mmBtu
per hour or greater), to remove the requirement to meet TM 90 for QA/QC
procedures and replace with a reference to the new QA/QC requirements
in COMAR 26.11.31, and to clarify CEMs requirements regarding
pollutants to be continuously measured for municipal waste combustors,
Kraft pulp mills, and fluidized bed combustors. The action also added
COMAR 26.11.01.10E for recordkeeping and reporting requirements for
CEMs.
Finally, on July 29, 2011, MDE adopted further revisions to the
provisions of COMAR 26.11.01.10 and COMAR 26.11.01.11 to remove
remaining references to TM 90, and to clarify that the QA/QC procedures
for COMs are now in COMAR 26.11.31. Further EPA analysis of the
revisions to these Maryland regulations as well as the reasons
supporting EPA's proposed approval of these revisions are provided in
the TSD supporting this rulemaking which can be found in the docket for
this proposed rulemaking action and is available online at https://www.regulations.gov.
III. Proposed Action
EPA's review of this material indicates that the November 24, 2015
submittal, as amended by MDE's February 26, 2016 letter, is in
accordance with the CAA and is therefore approvable. Because TM 90
contains enforcement exemptions, its removal strengthens the Maryland
SIP. EPA is proposing to approve the Maryland SIP revision submittal
which contains revisions and amendments to provisions for COMs and CEMs
in COMAR 26.11.01.01 and COMAR 26.11.01.10 and adds new provisions for
COMs and CEMs at COMAR 26.11.01.11 and COMAR 26.11.31. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this proposed action, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA
rule, regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference revisions to the requirements for COMs and
CEMs in Maryland
[[Page 39607]]
regulation COMAR 26.01.01 and COMAR 26.01.31, discussed previously in
section II of this rulemaking. EPA has made, and will continue to make,
these documents generally available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or may be viewed at the appropriate EPA office
(see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule to approve revisions to Maryland
regulation COMAR 26.01.01 and to approve the addition of COMAR 26.01.31
into the Maryland SIP does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP
is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and
EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 27, 2016.
Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2016-14394 Filed 6-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P