International Product Change-GEPS 6 Contracts, 39721-39722 [2016-14375]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Notices
V. Schedule for Submittal of Pre-Filed
Documents
No later than July 7, 2016, unless the
Commission directs otherwise, the staff
and the applicant shall submit a list of
its anticipated witnesses for the hearing.
No later than July 7, 2016, unless the
Commission directs otherwise, the
applicant shall submit its pre-filed
written testimony. The staff previously
submitted its testimony on June 10,
2016.
The Commission may issue written
questions to the applicant or the staff
before the hearing. If such questions are
issued, an order containing such
questions will be issued no later than
June 24, 2016. Responses to such
questions are due July 7, 2016, unless
the Commission directs otherwise.
VI. Interested Government Participants
No later than June 27, 2016, any
interested State, local government body,
or affected, Federally-recognized Indian
tribe may file with the Commission a
statement of any issues or questions to
which the State, local government body,
or Indian tribe wishes the Commission
to give particular attention as part of the
uncontested hearing process. Such
statement may be accompanied by any
supporting documentation that the
State, local government body, or Indian
tribe sees fit to provide. Any statements
and supporting documentation (if any)
received by the Commission using the
agency’s E-filing system 2 by the
deadline indicated above will be made
part of the record of the proceeding. The
Commission will use such statements
and documents as appropriate to inform
its pre-hearing questions to the Staff and
applicant, its inquiries at the oral
hearing and its decision following the
hearing. The Commission may also
request, prior to July 14, 2016, that one
or more particular States, local
government bodies, or Indian tribes
send one representative each to the
evidentiary hearing to answer
Commission questions and/or make a
statement for the purpose of assisting
the Commission’s exploration of one or
more of the issues raised by the State,
local government body, or Indian tribe
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
2 The
process for accessing and using the agency’s
E-filing system is described in the December 8,
2008, notice of hearing that was issued by the
Commission for this proceeding. See Progress
Energy Florida, Inc.; Application for the Levy
County Nuclear Power Plant Units 1 and 2; Notice
of Order, Hearing, and Opportunity To Petition for
Leave To Intervene 73 FR 74532. Participants who
are unable to use the electronic information
exchange (EIE), or who will have difficulty
complying with EIE requirements in the time frame
provided for submission of written statements, may
provide their statements by electronic mail to
hearingdocket@nrc.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Jun 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
39721
in the pre-hearing filings described
above. The decision of whether to
request the presence of a representative
of a State, local government body, or
Indian tribe at the evidentiary hearing to
make a statement and/or answer
Commission questions is solely at the
Commission’s discretion. The
Commission’s request will specify the
issue or issues that the representative
should be prepared to address.
States, local governments, or Indian
tribes should be aware that this
evidentiary hearing is separate and
distinct from the NRC’s contested
hearing process. Issues within the scope
of contentions that have been admitted
or contested issues pending before the
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board or
the Commission in a contested
proceeding for a COL application are
outside the scope of the uncontested
proceeding for that COL application. In
addition, although States, local
governments, or Indian tribes
participating as described above may
take any position they wish, or no
position at all, with respect to issues
regarding the COL application or the
NRC staff’s associated environmental
review that do fall within the scope of
the uncontested proceeding (i.e., issues
that are not within the scope of
admitted contentions or pending
contested issues), they should be aware
that many of the procedures and rights
applicable to the NRC’s contested
hearing process due to the inherently
adversarial nature of such proceedings
are not available with respect to this
uncontested hearing. Participation in
the NRC’s contested hearing process is
governed by 10 CFR 2.309 (for persons
or entities, including States, local
governments, or Indian tribes, seeking to
file contentions of their own) and 10
CFR 2.315(c) (for interested States, local
governments, and Indian tribes seeking
to participate with respect to
contentions filed by others).
Participation in this uncontested
hearing does not affect the right of a
State, local government, or Indian tribe
to participate in the separate contested
hearing process.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day
of June, 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Rochelle C. Bavol,
Acting, Secretary of the Commission.
International Product Change—GEPS 6
Contracts
[FR Doc. 2016–14383 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket No. 55–71371–SP; ASLBP No. 16–
947–01–SP–BD01]
Alexander Abrahams; Establishment of
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
Pursuant to delegation by the
Commission, see 37 FR 28,710 (Dec. 29,
1972), and the Commission’s
regulations, see, e.g.,10 CFR 2.103(b),
2.300, 2.309, 2.313(a), 2.318, 2.321,
notice is hereby given that an Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is
being established to preside over the
following proceeding:
Alexander Abrahams (Denial of
Reactor Operator License)
This proceeding concerns a demand
for hearing pursuant to 10 CFR
2.103(b)(2) from Alexander Abrahams
challenging a May 5, 2016 letter from
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that
denied his application for a reactor
operator license for the Reed College
Reactor Facility.
The Board is comprised of the
following administrative judges:
Paul S. Ryerson, Chair, Atomic Safety
and Licensing Board Panel, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001
E. Roy Hawkens, Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001
Dr. Gary S. Arnold, Atomic Safety and
Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001
All correspondence, documents, and
other materials shall be filed in
accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule.
See 10 CFR 2.302.
Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th
day of June 2016.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety
and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2016–14363 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service gives
notice of filing a request with the Postal
Regulatory Commission to add Global
Expedited Package Services 6 Contracts
to the Competitive Products List.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
39722
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 117 / Friday, June 17, 2016 / Notices
Effective date: June 17, 2016.
Kyle
Coppin, (202) 268–2368.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642, on May 31, 2016, it filed with the
Postal Regulatory Commission a Request
of The United States Postal Service to
add Global Expedited Package Services
6 Contracts to the Competitive Products
List. Documents are available at
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2016–149
and CP2016–188.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[FR Doc. 2016–14375 Filed 6–16–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–78057; File No. SR–NYSE–
2016–31]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change
Amending NYSE Rule 6A To Exclude
the Physical Area Within Fully
Enclosed Telephone Booths Located
in 18 Broad Street From the Definition
of Trading Floor
June 13, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on May 31,
2016, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
NYSE Rule 6A (‘‘Trading Floor’’) to
exclude an area in 18 Broad Street that
has fully enclosed telephone booths
from the definition of Trading Floor.
The proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange’s Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:48 Jun 16, 2016
Jkt 238001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend NYSE Rule 6A
(‘‘Trading Floor’’) to exclude from the
definition of ‘‘Trading Floor’’ the area
within fully enclosed telephone booths
located in 18 Broad Street.
The Exchange currently defines
‘‘Trading Floor’’ 3 in Rule 6A to mean
the restricted-access physical areas
designated by the Exchange for the
trading of securities, commonly known
as the ‘‘Main Room,’’ the ‘‘Blue Room’’
and the ‘‘Garage.’’ 4 Rule 6A also
specifies that the Exchange’s Trading
Floor does not include areas designated
by the Exchange where NYSE Amexlisted options are traded, commonly
known as the ‘‘Extended Blue Room,’’
which, for the purposes of the
Exchange’s Rules, are referred to as the
‘‘NYSE Amex Options Trading Floor.’’ 5
The Exchange proposes to add subparagraph numbering to Rule 6A, so that
the first paragraph of the rule would be
sub-paragraph (a) and the second
paragraph would be sub-paragraph (b).
As proposed, Rule 6A(a) would define
the term ‘‘Trading Floor,’’ and proposed
3 Access to the Trading Floor is restricted at each
entrance by turnstiles and only authorized visitors,
members or member firm employees are permitted
to enter.
4 See NYSE Rule 6A; see also Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 59479 (Mar. 2, 2009), 74 FR 10325
(Mar. 10, 2009) (SR–NYSE–2009–23) (Notice of
filing adopting NYSE Rule 6A and explaining that
the proposed definition of ‘‘Trading Floor’’ will
provide a more accurate description of the physical
areas of the Floor where trading is actually
conducted).
5 Id. The term ‘‘Trading Floor’’ is distinct from the
term ‘‘Floor.’’ The term ‘‘Floor’’ means the trading
Floor of the Exchange and the premises
immediately adjacent thereto, such as the various
entrances and lobbies of the 11 Wall Street, 18 New
Street, 8 Broad Street, 12 Broad Street and 18 Broad
Street Buildings, and also means the telephone
facilities available in these locations. See NYSE
Rule 6.
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Rule 6A(b) would define which physical
areas are excluded from the definition of
‘‘Trading Floor.’’
The Exchange first proposes to amend
Rule 6A to reflect the renaming of the
physical area formerly known as the
‘‘Garage.’’ That area has been renamed
the ‘‘Buttonwood Room’’ and the
Exchange proposes to reflect this change
in Rule 6A. Rule 6A also currently
defines Trading Floor to include areas
commonly known as the ‘‘Blue Room’’
and also refers to an area commonly
referred to as the ‘‘Extended Blue
Room.’’ 6 The Exchange recently closed
those areas and moved all member
organizations, member organization
employees and NYSE Amex Options
trading activities that were previously
housed in these areas to the Buttonwood
Room. To reflect this change, the
Exchange proposes to delete references
to the Blue Room and Extended Blue
Room from Rule 6A and replace them
with a reference to the Buttonwood
Room.
With respect to proposed Rule 6A(b),
the current rule already excludes the
NYSE Amex Options Trading Floor
from the definition of ‘‘Trading Floor.’’
To reflect the change to the names of the
trading rooms and the relocation of the
NYSE Amex Options Trading Floor to
the Buttonwood Room, the Exchange
proposes to amend Rule 6A(b) to refer
to the Buttonwood Room when referring
to the NYSE Amex Options Trading
Floor. Accordingly, the proposed rule
would exclude from the definition of
Trading Floor the designated areas in
the Buttonwood Room where NYSE
Amex-listed options are traded which,
for the purposes of the Exchange’s
Rules, would continue to be referred to
as the ‘‘NYSE Amex Options Trading
Floor.’’ 7 This proposed change does not
make any substantive changes and
reflects only the location change for
NYSE Amex Options. This proposal
would have no impact on the physical
location of NYSE Amex Options
personnel as they would remain in their
current location in the Buttonwood
Room.
The Exchange next proposes to amend
Rule 6A(b) to exclude an additional area
from the definition of Trading Floor. As
proposed, the Exchange proposes to
exclude from the definition of Trading
6 The Blue Room and Extended Blue Room are
references to trading spaces previously utilized by
member firm employees and NYSE Amex Options
at 20 Broad Street.
7 As when the NYSE Amex Options Trading Floor
was located in the Extended Blue Room, in the
Buttonwood Room, the Exchange has erected
physical barriers between the NYSE Amex Options
Trading Floor and any Exchange member
organizations or Exchange personnel that are also
located in the Buttonwood Room.
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39721-39722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14375]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
International Product Change--GEPS 6 Contracts
AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the
Postal Regulatory Commission to add Global Expedited Package Services 6
Contracts to the Competitive Products List.
[[Page 39722]]
DATES: Effective date: June 17, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kyle Coppin, (202) 268-2368.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg]
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642, on May 31, 2016,
it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a Request of The United
States Postal Service to add Global Expedited Package Services 6
Contracts to the Competitive Products List. Documents are available at
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2016-149 and CP2016-188.
Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-14375 Filed 6-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
