Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District and Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District, 39211-39213 [2016-14098]
Download as PDF
39211
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 116 / Thursday, June 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Name of non-regulatory
SIP revision
Applicable
geographic
area
*
Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements
for the 2012 Particulate
Matter NAAQS.
*
Statewide .......
State
submittal date
7/16/15
*
6/16/16, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
Additional explanation
*
*
*
Docket #2015–0838. This action addresses the following CAA elements, or portions thereof:
110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D)(i)(II)(PSD), (D)(ii), (E),
(F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M).
This rule is effective on August
15, 2016 without further notice, unless
the EPA receives adverse comments by
July 18, 2016. If we receive such
comments, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to
notify the public that this direct final
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2016–0124 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
DATES:
[FR Doc. 2016–14181 Filed 6–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0124; FRL–9946–38–
Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Eastern Kern Air Pollution
Control District and Yolo-Solano Air
Quality Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
*
EPA approval date
Direct final rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the YoloSolano Air Quality Management District
(YSAQMD) and Eastern Kern Air
Pollution Control District (EKAPCD)
portions of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern, respectively, the
definition of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), and emissions of
VOCs from the surface coating
operations of wood products. We are
approving local rules that regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act).
SUMMARY:
section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule and rule revision?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. EPA Recommendations To Further
Improve the Rules
D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules addressed by
this action with the dates that they were
adopted by the local air agencies and
submitted by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
EKAPCD .........
YSAQMD ........
410.9
1.1
Wood Products Surface Coating Operations .................................................
General Provisions and Definitions ................................................................
On September 11, 2014, and January
19, 2016, the EPA determined that the
submittals for EKAPCD Rule 410.9 and
YSAQMD Rule 1.1 respectively met the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51
Appendix V, which must be met before
formal EPA review.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:07 Jun 15, 2016
Adopted/
amended/
revised
Rule title
Jkt 238001
3/13/2014
7/08/2015
Submitted
7/25/2014
11/13/2015
B. Are there other versions of these
rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule and rule revision?
There are no previous versions of
Rule 410.9 in the SIP. We approved an
earlier version of Rule 1.1 into the SIP
on April 28, 2015 (80 FR 23449).
VOCs help produce ground-level
ozone, smog and PM, which harm
human health and the environment.
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires
States to submit regulations that control
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
39212
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 116 / Thursday, June 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
VOC emissions. Rule 410.9 limits and
controls VOC emission from surface
coating operations of wood products.
The revisions to Rule 1.1 do not have a
direct effect on air pollution emissions;
they amend the definition of VOC that
is used in other YSAQMD rules to
exempt certain substances that have
been determined to have negligible
photochemical reactivity and which are
excluded from the definition applied by
the EPA. The EPA’s technical support
documents (TSDs) have more
information about these rules.
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
SIP rules must be enforceable (see
CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements
concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress or other CAA
requirements (see CAA section 110(l)),
and must not modify certain SIP control
requirements in nonattainment areas
without ensuring equivalent or greater
emissions reductions (see CAA section
193).
Generally, SIP rules must require
Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for each category of
sources covered by a Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document
as well as each major source of VOCs in
ozone nonattainment areas classified as
moderate or above (see CAA sections
182(b)(2)). The EKAPCD and the
YSAQMD regulate ozone areas
classified as Marginal Nonattainment
and Severe Nonattainment respectively
for the federal 8-hour 2008 Ozone
Standard. 40 CFR 81.305. The TSDs
have more information about these
requirements as they relate to the
submitted rules.
Guidance and policy documents that
we used to evaluate enforceability,
revision/relaxation and rule stringency
requirements for the applicable criteria
pollutants include the following:
1. ‘‘State Implementation Plans;
General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean
Air Act Amendments of 1990,’’ (57 FR
13498, April 16, 1992 and 57 FR 18070,
April 28, 1992).
2. ‘‘Issues Relating to VOC Regulation
Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations’’
(‘‘the Bluebook,’’ U.S. EPA, May 25,
1988; revised January 11, 1990).
3. ‘‘Guidance Document for Correcting
Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies’’ (‘‘the Little Bluebook’’,
EPA Region 9, August 21, 2001).
4. Control Techniques Guidelines,
‘‘Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions from Wood Furniture
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:07 Jun 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
Manufacturing Operations’’ (EPA–453/
R–96–007, April 1996).
5. Control Techniques Guidelines,
‘‘Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat
Wood Paneling Coatings’’ (EPA–453/R–
06–004, September 2006).
6. Code of Federal Regulations, Title
40, Chapter C, Part 51, Subpart F,
Section 51.100, ‘‘Definitions’’ (40 CFR
51.100).
forth below. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at the appropriate EPA office (see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble for
more information).
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
We believe these rules are consistent
with the relevant policy and guidance
regarding enforceability, stringency and
SIP relaxations. The TSDs have more
information on our evaluation.
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
C. EPA Recommendations To Further
Improve the Rules
The TSDs describe additional rule
revisions that we recommend for the
next time the local agency modifies the
rules but which are not currently the
basis for rule disapproval.
D. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of
the Act, the EPA is fully approving the
submitted rules because we believe they
fulfill all relevant requirements. We do
not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without
proposing it in advance. However, in
the Proposed Rules section of this issue
of the Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of
the same submitted rules. If we receive
adverse comments by July 18, 2016, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that the direct final approval will not
take effect and we will address the
comments in a subsequent final action
based on the proposal. If we do not
receive timely adverse comments, the
direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on August 15,
2016. This will incorporate these rules
into the federally enforceable SIP.
Please note that if the EPA receives
adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if
that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, the EPA may
adopt as final those provisions of the
rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
EKAPCD and YSAQMD rules described
in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 116 / Thursday, June 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by August 15, 2016.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with
objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in
response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action
published in the Proposed Rules section
of today’s Federal Register, rather than
file an immediate petition for judicial
review of this direct final rule, so that
the EPA can withdraw this direct final
rule and address the comment in the
proposed rulemaking. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
Dated: May 3, 2016.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
Pacific Bluefin Tuna in the Eastern
Pacific Ocean; Response to Petition
for Rulemaking
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:07 Jun 15, 2016
Jkt 238001
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(442)(i)(F)(3),
(c)(447)(i)(D)(4), and (c)(472) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(442) * * *
(i) * * *
(F) * * *
(3) Previously approved on April 28,
2015 in paragraph (442)(i)(F)(1) of this
section and now deleted with
replacement in (472)(i)(A)(1), Rule 1.1,
‘‘General Provisions and Definitions,’’
revised on May 8, 2013.
*
*
*
*
*
(447) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) * * *
(4) Rule 410.9, ‘‘Wood Products
Surface Coating Operations,’’ adopted
on March 13, 2014.
*
*
*
*
*
(472) New and amended regulations
were submitted on November 13, 2015,
by the Governor’s designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 1.1, General Provisions and
Definitions, revised July 8, 2015.
[FR Doc. 2016–14098 Filed 6–15–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
RIN 0648–XD344
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
39213
Notice of decision on petition.
NMFS announces its decision
on a petition for rulemaking submitted
by the Center for Biological Diversity
(CBD). In their petition, CBD requested
that NMFS implement additional
domestic regulations to address the
relative impacts of the U.S. fleet on the
Pacific bluefin tuna (PBF) stock, which
is overfished and subject to overfishing.
Outside of the scope of their petition for
rulemaking, CBD also requested that
NMFS develop recommendations for
international fishery management
organizations to take actions to end
overfishing of PBF. In light of public
comments, NMFS is responding to each
element of the petition but referring the
specific requests for rulemaking under
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(MSA) to the Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Pacific Council)
for further consideration. The decision
was made on June 9, 2016.
DATES: June 16, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heidi Taylor, NMFS, 562–980–4039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS
received a letter from CBD, an
environmental non-governmental
organization, on April 9, 2014. In the
letter, CBD asserted that PBF (Thunnus
orientalis) are not adequately protected
under the Fishery Management Plan for
U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Highly
Migratory Species (HMS FMP) and that
the Pacific Council failed to meet its
statutory duty to develop
recommendations for domestic
regulations in response to NMFS’
determination that the PBF stock is
overfished and subject to overfishing (78
FR 41033, July 9, 2013). Specifically,
CBD petitioned NMFS to amend the
HMS FMP or initiate a rulemaking
under the authority of the MSA, 16
U.S.C. 1801 et seq., to include PBF as
a prohibited species until the stock is
rebuilt, thereby placing a moratorium on
retention of PBF by U.S. fishing vessels.
As an alternative, CBD proposed that
NMFS establish annual catch limits and
a permanent minimum size requirement
to protect PBF of age classes 1 and 2 and
that NMFS amend the HMS FMP to
establish specific reference points for
PBF to guide science-based management
of the stock. Outside of the scope of the
petition for rulemaking, CBD requested
that NMFS develop recommendations to
the Secretary of State and Congress to
end PBF overfishing at the international
level.
SUMMARY:
Public Input on the Petition
NMFS published a Federal Register
document on July 24, 2014 (79 FR
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 39211-39213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14098]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0124; FRL-9946-38-Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Eastern Kern Air
Pollution Control District and Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management
District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve revisions to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District (YSAQMD) and Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control
District (EKAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern, respectively, the definition of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and emissions of VOCs from the
surface coating operations of wood products. We are approving local
rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on August 15, 2016 without further
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by July 18, 2016. If
we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2016-0124 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule and rule revision?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules
D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules addressed by this action with the dates
that they were adopted by the local air agencies and submitted by the
California Air Resources Board (CARB).
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adopted/
Local agency Rule No. Rule title amended/ Submitted
revised
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EKAPCD........................ 410.9 Wood Products Surface Coating 3/13/2014 7/25/2014
Operations.
YSAQMD........................ 1.1 General Provisions and 7/08/2015 11/13/2015
Definitions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On September 11, 2014, and January 19, 2016, the EPA determined
that the submittals for EKAPCD Rule 410.9 and YSAQMD Rule 1.1
respectively met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix
V, which must be met before formal EPA review.
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
There are no previous versions of Rule 410.9 in the SIP. We
approved an earlier version of Rule 1.1 into the SIP on April 28, 2015
(80 FR 23449).
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule and rule revision?
VOCs help produce ground-level ozone, smog and PM, which harm human
health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States
to submit regulations that control
[[Page 39212]]
VOC emissions. Rule 410.9 limits and controls VOC emission from surface
coating operations of wood products. The revisions to Rule 1.1 do not
have a direct effect on air pollution emissions; they amend the
definition of VOC that is used in other YSAQMD rules to exempt certain
substances that have been determined to have negligible photochemical
reactivity and which are excluded from the definition applied by the
EPA. The EPA's technical support documents (TSDs) have more information
about these rules.
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section
110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in
nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions
reductions (see CAA section 193).
Generally, SIP rules must require Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) for each category of sources covered by a Control
Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document as well as each major source of
VOCs in ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate or above (see
CAA sections 182(b)(2)). The EKAPCD and the YSAQMD regulate ozone areas
classified as Marginal Nonattainment and Severe Nonattainment
respectively for the federal 8-hour 2008 Ozone Standard. 40 CFR 81.305.
The TSDs have more information about these requirements as they relate
to the submitted rules.
Guidance and policy documents that we used to evaluate
enforceability, revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements
for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following:
1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,''
(57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992 and 57 FR 18070, April 28, 1992).
2. ``Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations'' (``the Bluebook,'' U.S. EPA, May 25, 1988; revised January
11, 1990).
3. ``Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies'' (``the Little Bluebook'', EPA Region 9, August 21,
2001).
4. Control Techniques Guidelines, ``Control of Volatile Organic
Compound Emissions from Wood Furniture Manufacturing Operations'' (EPA-
453/R-96-007, April 1996).
5. Control Techniques Guidelines, ``Control Techniques Guidelines
for Flat Wood Paneling Coatings'' (EPA-453/R-06-004, September 2006).
6. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Chapter C, Part 51,
Subpart F, Section 51.100, ``Definitions'' (40 CFR 51.100).
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability, stringency and SIP relaxations. The
TSDs have more information on our evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendations To Further Improve the Rules
The TSDs describe additional rule revisions that we recommend for
the next time the local agency modifies the rules but which are not
currently the basis for rule disapproval.
D. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this issue of the Federal
Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of the same
submitted rules. If we receive adverse comments by July 18, 2016, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the
public that the direct final approval will not take effect and we will
address the comments in a subsequent final action based on the
proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct
final approval will be effective without further notice on August 15,
2016. This will incorporate these rules into the federally enforceable
SIP.
Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final
those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
EKAPCD and YSAQMD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52
set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
documents available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in
hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble for more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
[[Page 39213]]
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by August 15, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed
Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so
that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: May 3, 2016.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(442)(i)(F)(3),
(c)(447)(i)(D)(4), and (c)(472) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(442) * * *
(i) * * *
(F) * * *
(3) Previously approved on April 28, 2015 in paragraph
(442)(i)(F)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(472)(i)(A)(1), Rule 1.1, ``General Provisions and Definitions,''
revised on May 8, 2013.
* * * * *
(447) * * *
(i) * * *
(D) * * *
(4) Rule 410.9, ``Wood Products Surface Coating Operations,''
adopted on March 13, 2014.
* * * * *
(472) New and amended regulations were submitted on November 13,
2015, by the Governor's designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 1.1, General Provisions and Definitions, revised July 8,
2015.
[FR Doc. 2016-14098 Filed 6-15-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P