Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 38705-38707 [2016-14016]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices III. Do PR Notices contain binding requirements? The PR Notice about the determination of a minor use is intended to provide guidance to EPA personnel and decision-makers and to pesticide registrants. While the requirements in the statutes and Agency regulations are binding on EPA and the applicants, this PR Notice is not binding on either EPA or pesticide registrants, and EPA may depart from the guidance where circumstances warrant and without prior notice. Likewise, pesticide registrants may assert that the guidance is not appropriate generally or not applicable to a specific pesticide or situation. [FR Doc. 2016–14037 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am] FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Sunshine Act Meetings Federal Election Commission. Thursday, June 16, 2016 at 10:00 a.m. PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor). STATUS: This Meeting will be open to the public. ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: Correction and Approval of Minutes for May 19, 2016 Draft Advisory Opinion 2016–05: Huckabee for President, Inc. srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Jkt 238001 [FR Doc. 2016–14077 Filed 6–10–16; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 6715–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [60 Day–16–16AQM; Docket No. CDC–2016– 0052] Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of its continuing efforts to reduce public burden and maximize the utility of government information, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on the Presidential Youth Fitness Program (PYFP) Evaluation. The Evaluation will be conducted in approximately 11 middle schools implementing the PYFP and 11 match comparison schools and will focus on both process and outcome measures. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 15, 2016. SUMMARY: BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 19:36 Jun 13, 2016 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notice with comment period. Dated: May 31, 2016. Jack E. Housenger, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. VerDate Sep<11>2014 ADDRESSES: AGENCY: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. DATE AND TIME: Proposed Statement of Policy Regarding the Public Disclosure of Closed Enforcement Files Other Rulemaking REG 2016–02: Draft Interim Final Rules and Explanation and Justification: Civil Money Penalty Inflation Adjustments Proposed Revisions to Forms 3, 3P, 3X, 6 and Instructions Management and Administrative Matters Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694–1040, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date. PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694–1220. Shawn Woodhead Werth, Secretary and Clerk of the Commission. exclusive use period for data submitted in support of a registration under FIFRA section 3(c)(1)(F)(ii) or a new exclusive use period for data submitted to support a registration under FIFRA section 3(c)(1)(F)(vi). These clauses are intended to provide incentives to registrants to obtain registrations for uses that might otherwise go unfulfilled because they offer low returns because of low demand. The information collection activities associated with the activities described in this PR Notice are already approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. The corresponding Information Collection Request (ICR) document for the Application for New and Amended Pesticide Registration has been assigned EPA ICR number 0277.16 and is approved OMB control number 2070– 0060. AGENCY: 38705 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC–2016– 0052 by any of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Mail: Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS– D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and Docket Number. All relevant comments received will be posted without change to Regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to Regulations.gov. Please note: All public comment should be submitted through the Federal eRulemaking portal (Regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the address listed above. To request more information on the proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan and instruments, contact the Information Collection Review Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS–D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404–639–7570; Email: omb@cdc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each new proposed collection, each proposed extension of existing collection of information, and each reinstatement of previously approved information collection before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, we are publishing this notice of a proposed data collection as described below. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1 38706 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; to develop, acquire, install and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; to train personnel and to be able to respond to a collection of information, to search data sources, to complete and review the collection of information; and to transmit or otherwise disclose the information. srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Proposed Project Presidential Youth Fitness Program Evaluation—New—National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description It is well documented that obesity and a lack of physical activity (PA) among children and adolescents are current public health problems in the United States. Because school-aged children spend more than half of their waking hours in school and engage in 20%– 30% of their total PA at school, schools are ideal settings for reaching a diverse cross-section of children with interventions to increase PA, including those children experiencing health disparities. This is particularly important in middle school, where research shows lower levels of physical activity when compared with younger students. Evidence shows that multicomponent school-based physical education (PE) programs are effective at improving children’s health and academic outcomes. Along with these improvements, school-based PE should provide fitness assessments, development of personal fitness plans, and improved cognitive understanding about the importance of PA and a healthy lifestyle. The Presidential Youth Fitness Program (PYFP) incorporates each of these factors. To replace normative-referenced fitness measures (i.e., the President’s Challenge Youth Fitness Test), the PYFP has adopted a criterion-based assessment, using the FitnessGram® fitness measurement system, which compares each student’s measurements to a set of standards for VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:36 Jun 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 fitness and health. Each student can determine where he or she falls in relation to the standard and establish a goal for reaching or exceeding it. The PYFP also adds fitness education to PE, provides professional development for PE teachers, and includes a recognition system for students who achieve Healthy Fitness Zone standards. In 2013, the Presidential Youth Fitness Program began its first round of funding to elementary, middle and high school PE teachers who applied to the program. A second round of funding began in 2014 and a third in 2015. Each participating school receives support to implement the PYFP for three years. The resources provided to PE teachers include: Professional development training, awards for student recognition of fitness achievements, access to a professional learning community and access to FitnessGram® fitness assessment software. For the schools selected to receive PYFP support, the requirements include: (1) Information Technology (IT) manager and PE teacher participation in the FitnessGram® software training, (2) PE teacher participation in PYFP professional development training, (3) conducting FitnessGram® assessments according to the training, (4) recognizing student achievement in fitness and physical activity, (5) confirming continued participation in the program at the end of Years 1 and 2, and (6) participating in evaluation activities. The PYFP is designed to supplement the traditional PE course and support physical education (PE) teachers in laying the foundation for students to lead an active life. CDC plans to conduct the first rigorous evaluation of the PYFP. The evaluation will assess the impact of the program on student, PE teacher and school level outcomes (outcome evaluation) as well as barriers and facilitators to program implementation (process evaluation). Evaluation activities will take place in 11 schools implementing the PYFP and 11 match comparison schools, contributing a total of 82 sixth grade PE classes. Information collection will be conducted in 6 PYFP and 6 match comparison schools in Spring 2017 and 5 PYFP and 5 match comparison schools in Fall 2017. The PYFP schools recruited to participate in the PYFP Evaluation will be identified from a list of schools receiving Round 2 or Round 3 PYFP funding and meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) Middle school with a sixth grade, (2) sixth grade enrollment of 150 or higher, (3) 50% or more of students receiving free or reduced lunch, and (4) documented completion of PYFP PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 professional development training. Comparison schools will be matched based on criteria 1–3 above as well as location to ensure similar PE policies and standards. The process and outcome evaluation will involve data collection activities with four respondent groups: (1) Students, (2) PE teachers, (3) parents, and (4) school administrators. The specific aims of the outcome evaluation are to examine how the PYFP impacts student fitness and physical activity, particularly how the program impacts student: (1) Fitness knowledge and health knowledge, (2) attitudes toward physical activity, (3) motivation to be physically active, (4) physical activity levels, and (5) fitness. Surveys to be conducted at all schools include the: (1) Paper-based PYFP Student Survey, (2) online PYFP PE Teacher Survey, and (3) online PYFP School Administrator Survey. There are minor differences in the survey instruments depending on whether the school is a PYFP participant or a non-PYFP school. The outcome evaluation will also determine the changes made as a result of the PYFP such as changes at the school level (e.g., improved PE and physical activity policies and practices, increased parent awareness of school PE and physical activity) and changes in PE teaching practices (e.g., integration of fitness education, increased use of fitness assessment tools and improved practices for fitness testing). The outcome evaluation will include fitness assessments with approximately 2,460 students as part of the standard PE program (1,230 PYFP sixth grade students and 1,230 non-PYFP sixth grade students). Fitness assessments will be conducted at both the beginning and end of the semester using FitnessGram®’s pacer and body composition assessments. Finally, a subset of 6 PYFP and 6 match comparison schools will assess students’ physical activity levels by collecting student accelerometry data. Accelerometry will be conducted in a subset of 25 PYFP and 25 non-PYFP classes to capture data from approximately 500 students (250 students from PYFP schools and 250 students from match comparison schools). Accelerometry data collection will involve wearing the device for a week at the beginning and a week at the end of semester and noting hours of wear time and class schedule. Information collection for the process evaluation will be conducted only in the 11 PYFP schools. The aims of the process evaluation are to describe how PYFP resources were used by teachers and schools, the strategies used by E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1 38707 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices teachers and schools to integrate fitness education and student recognition of fitness achievement into the schools, and barriers and facilitators relevant to PYFP implementation. All PYFP schools will complete cost and time use worksheets. In addition, focus groups with PE teachers, students, and parents PYFP compared with a traditional PE curriculum and gather information critical for program improvement. OMB approval is requested for two years. Participation in the PYFP Evaluation is voluntary and there are no costs to respondents other than their time. will be conducted in a subset of 6 PYFP schools. Focus groups will take place on school grounds during or outside of the school day, depending on availability of a given respondent group. The information collected for the PYFP evaluation will allow the CDC and partners to assess the impact of the ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS Type of respondents 6th grade students in PYFP Schools. PE teachers in PYFP Schools. School administrators in PYFP Schools. Parents of 6th graders enrolled in PE at PYFP Schools. 6th grade students in non-PYFP Schools. PE teachers in nonPYFP Schools. School Administrators in non-PYFP Schools. Total ........................ Total burden (in hrs) 615 125 615 30 22 12 6 6 6 30 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 15/60 30/60 15/60 1 25/60 1 30/60 20/60 1 1 308 125 154 30 9 12 3 2 6 30 FitnessGram® Data Collection Form ................... Accelerometry Log ............................................... Student Survey (non-PYFP Schools) .................. PE Teacher Survey (non-PYFP Schools) ........... 615 125 615 22 2 2 1 1 15/60 30/60 15/60 20/60 308 125 154 8 (non-PYFP 6 1 20/60 2 .............................................................................. ........................ ........................ ........................ 1,276 School Administrator Schools). [FR Doc. 2016–14016 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Jkt 238001 regulations. This authority must also be exercised in accordance with the Department’s established policies, procedures, guidelines and regulations and with all other pertinent issuances. This delegation became effective upon date of signature. In addition, I have affirmed and ratified any actions taken by the Director, CDC, or other CDC officials which involve the exercise of the authorities delegated herein prior to the effective date of this delegation. [FR Doc. 2016–13995 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am] Notice is hereby given that pursuant to section 222 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 217a], as amended, I have delegated to the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), authority to appoint temporary members to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health’s Safety and Occupational Health Study Section (SOHSS). These authorities shall be exercised under the Department’s existing delegation of authority and policy on 19:36 Jun 13, 2016 Survey Dated: June 7, 2016. Sylvia M. Burwell, Secretary. Advisory Councils or Committees; Delegation of Authority srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Average burden per response (in hrs) FitnessGram® Data Collection Form ................... Accelerometry Log ............................................... Student Survey (PYFP Schools) ......................... Student Focus Group Moderator Guide .............. PE Teacher Survey (PYFP Schools) .................. PE Teacher Focus Group Moderator Guide ....... PYFP Time Use Worksheet ................................ School Administrator Survey (PYFP Schools) .... PYFP Cost Worksheet ........................................ Parent Focus Group Moderator Guide ................ Leroy A. Richardson, Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. VerDate Sep<11>2014 Numner of responses per respondent Number of respondents Form name BILLING CODE 4160–18–P PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [60Day–16–16AOW; Docket No. CDC–2016– 0050] Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notice with comment period. AGENCY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the utility of government information, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on the CDC I-Catalyst program. The I-Catalyst program is intended to help CDC employees get their ideas out of the starting blocks and down the track through a discovery, SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM 14JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38705-38707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14016]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[60 Day-16-16AQM; Docket No. CDC-2016-0052]


Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and 
Recommendations

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice with comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part 
of its continuing efforts to reduce public burden and maximize the 
utility of government information, invites the general public and other 
Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or 
continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on the Presidential 
Youth Fitness Program (PYFP) Evaluation. The Evaluation will be 
conducted in approximately 11 middle schools implementing the PYFP and 
11 match comparison schools and will focus on both process and outcome 
measures.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 15, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC-2016-
0052 by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Regulations.gov. Follow the 
instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection Review 
Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road 
NE., MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and Docket Number. All relevant comments received will be posted 
without change to Regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided. For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to Regulations.gov.

    Please note:  All public comment should be submitted through the 
Federal eRulemaking portal (Regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the 
address listed above.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the 
proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan 
and instruments, contact the Information Collection Review Office, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS-
D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404-639-7570; Email: omb@cdc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from 
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of 
information they conduct or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also requires 
Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register 
concerning each proposed collection of information, including each new 
proposed collection, each proposed extension of existing collection of 
information, and each reinstatement of previously approved information 
collection before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To 
comply with this requirement, we are publishing this notice of a 
proposed data collection as described below.
    Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical 
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including through the use of automated collection techniques

[[Page 38706]]

or other forms of information technology; and (e) estimates of capital 
or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of 
services to provide information. Burden means the total time, effort, 
or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, 
retain, disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. 
This includes the time needed to review instructions; to develop, 
acquire, install and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of 
collecting, validating and verifying information, processing and 
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; to 
train personnel and to be able to respond to a collection of 
information, to search data sources, to complete and review the 
collection of information; and to transmit or otherwise disclose the 
information.

Proposed Project

    Presidential Youth Fitness Program Evaluation--New--National Center 
for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Background and Brief Description

    It is well documented that obesity and a lack of physical activity 
(PA) among children and adolescents are current public health problems 
in the United States. Because school-aged children spend more than half 
of their waking hours in school and engage in 20%-30% of their total PA 
at school, schools are ideal settings for reaching a diverse cross-
section of children with interventions to increase PA, including those 
children experiencing health disparities. This is particularly 
important in middle school, where research shows lower levels of 
physical activity when compared with younger students.
    Evidence shows that multicomponent school-based physical education 
(PE) programs are effective at improving children's health and academic 
outcomes. Along with these improvements, school-based PE should provide 
fitness assessments, development of personal fitness plans, and 
improved cognitive understanding about the importance of PA and a 
healthy lifestyle. The Presidential Youth Fitness Program (PYFP) 
incorporates each of these factors. To replace normative-referenced 
fitness measures (i.e., the President's Challenge Youth Fitness Test), 
the PYFP has adopted a criterion-based assessment, using the 
FitnessGram[supreg] fitness measurement system, which compares each 
student's measurements to a set of standards for fitness and health. 
Each student can determine where he or she falls in relation to the 
standard and establish a goal for reaching or exceeding it. The PYFP 
also adds fitness education to PE, provides professional development 
for PE teachers, and includes a recognition system for students who 
achieve Healthy Fitness Zone standards.
    In 2013, the Presidential Youth Fitness Program began its first 
round of funding to elementary, middle and high school PE teachers who 
applied to the program. A second round of funding began in 2014 and a 
third in 2015. Each participating school receives support to implement 
the PYFP for three years. The resources provided to PE teachers 
include: Professional development training, awards for student 
recognition of fitness achievements, access to a professional learning 
community and access to FitnessGram[supreg] fitness assessment 
software. For the schools selected to receive PYFP support, the 
requirements include: (1) Information Technology (IT) manager and PE 
teacher participation in the FitnessGram[supreg] software training, (2) 
PE teacher participation in PYFP professional development training, (3) 
conducting FitnessGram[supreg] assessments according to the training, 
(4) recognizing student achievement in fitness and physical activity, 
(5) confirming continued participation in the program at the end of 
Years 1 and 2, and (6) participating in evaluation activities. The PYFP 
is designed to supplement the traditional PE course and support 
physical education (PE) teachers in laying the foundation for students 
to lead an active life.
    CDC plans to conduct the first rigorous evaluation of the PYFP. The 
evaluation will assess the impact of the program on student, PE teacher 
and school level outcomes (outcome evaluation) as well as barriers and 
facilitators to program implementation (process evaluation). Evaluation 
activities will take place in 11 schools implementing the PYFP and 11 
match comparison schools, contributing a total of 82 sixth grade PE 
classes. Information collection will be conducted in 6 PYFP and 6 match 
comparison schools in Spring 2017 and 5 PYFP and 5 match comparison 
schools in Fall 2017. The PYFP schools recruited to participate in the 
PYFP Evaluation will be identified from a list of schools receiving 
Round 2 or Round 3 PYFP funding and meeting the following inclusion 
criteria: (1) Middle school with a sixth grade, (2) sixth grade 
enrollment of 150 or higher, (3) 50% or more of students receiving free 
or reduced lunch, and (4) documented completion of PYFP professional 
development training. Comparison schools will be matched based on 
criteria 1-3 above as well as location to ensure similar PE policies 
and standards. The process and outcome evaluation will involve data 
collection activities with four respondent groups: (1) Students, (2) PE 
teachers, (3) parents, and (4) school administrators.
    The specific aims of the outcome evaluation are to examine how the 
PYFP impacts student fitness and physical activity, particularly how 
the program impacts student: (1) Fitness knowledge and health 
knowledge, (2) attitudes toward physical activity, (3) motivation to be 
physically active, (4) physical activity levels, and (5) fitness. 
Surveys to be conducted at all schools include the: (1) Paper-based 
PYFP Student Survey, (2) online PYFP PE Teacher Survey, and (3) online 
PYFP School Administrator Survey. There are minor differences in the 
survey instruments depending on whether the school is a PYFP 
participant or a non-PYFP school. The outcome evaluation will also 
determine the changes made as a result of the PYFP such as changes at 
the school level (e.g., improved PE and physical activity policies and 
practices, increased parent awareness of school PE and physical 
activity) and changes in PE teaching practices (e.g., integration of 
fitness education, increased use of fitness assessment tools and 
improved practices for fitness testing).
    The outcome evaluation will include fitness assessments with 
approximately 2,460 students as part of the standard PE program (1,230 
PYFP sixth grade students and 1,230 non-PYFP sixth grade students). 
Fitness assessments will be conducted at both the beginning and end of 
the semester using FitnessGram[supreg]'s pacer and body composition 
assessments. Finally, a subset of 6 PYFP and 6 match comparison schools 
will assess students' physical activity levels by collecting student 
accelerometry data. Accelerometry will be conducted in a subset of 25 
PYFP and 25 non-PYFP classes to capture data from approximately 500 
students (250 students from PYFP schools and 250 students from match 
comparison schools). Accelerometry data collection will involve wearing 
the device for a week at the beginning and a week at the end of 
semester and noting hours of wear time and class schedule.
    Information collection for the process evaluation will be conducted 
only in the 11 PYFP schools. The aims of the process evaluation are to 
describe how PYFP resources were used by teachers and schools, the 
strategies used by

[[Page 38707]]

teachers and schools to integrate fitness education and student 
recognition of fitness achievement into the schools, and barriers and 
facilitators relevant to PYFP implementation. All PYFP schools will 
complete cost and time use worksheets. In addition, focus groups with 
PE teachers, students, and parents will be conducted in a subset of 6 
PYFP schools. Focus groups will take place on school grounds during or 
outside of the school day, depending on availability of a given 
respondent group.
    The information collected for the PYFP evaluation will allow the 
CDC and partners to assess the impact of the PYFP compared with a 
traditional PE curriculum and gather information critical for program 
improvement.
    OMB approval is requested for two years. Participation in the PYFP 
Evaluation is voluntary and there are no costs to respondents other 
than their time.

                                                            Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                              Average
                                                                                             Number of       Numner of      burden per     Total burden
              Type of respondents                               Form name                   respondents    responses per   response  (in     (in hrs)
                                                                                                            respondent         hrs)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6th grade students in PYFP Schools.............  FitnessGram[supreg] Data Collection                 615               2           15/60             308
                                                  Form.                                              125               2           30/60             125
                                                 Accelerometry Log......................
                                                 Student Survey (PYFP Schools)..........             615               1           15/60             154
                                                 Student Focus Group Moderator Guide....              30               1               1              30
PE teachers in PYFP Schools....................  PE Teacher Survey (PYFP Schools).......              22               1           25/60               9
                                                 PE Teacher Focus Group Moderator Guide.              12               1               1              12
                                                 PYFP Time Use Worksheet................               6               1           30/60               3
School administrators in PYFP Schools..........  School Administrator Survey (PYFP                     6               1           20/60               2
                                                  Schools).                                            6               1               1               6
                                                 PYFP Cost Worksheet....................
Parents of 6th graders enrolled in PE at PYFP    Parent Focus Group Moderator Guide.....              30               1               1              30
 Schools.
6th grade students in non-PYFP Schools.........  FitnessGram[supreg] Data Collection                 615               2           15/60             308
                                                  Form.                                              125               2           30/60             125
                                                 Accelerometry Log......................
                                                 Student Survey (non-PYFP Schools)......             615               1           15/60             154
PE teachers in non-PYFP Schools................  PE Teacher Survey (non-PYFP Schools)...              22               1           20/60               8
School Administrators in non-PYFP Schools......  School Administrator Survey (non-PYFP                 6               1           20/60               2
                                                  Schools).
                                                                                         ---------------------------------------------------------------
    Total......................................  .......................................  ..............  ..............  ..............           1,276
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific 
Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the 
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2016-14016 Filed 6-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.