Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks Patriots Point, Charleston, SC, 38638-38640 [2016-13996]
Download as PDF
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
38638
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules
determined for Federal estate tax
purposes.
DATES: The public hearing is being held
on Monday, June 27, 2016 at 10:00 a.m.
The IRS must receive outlines of the
topics to be discussed at the public
hearing by Monday, June 20, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The public hearing is being
held in the IRS Auditorium, Internal
Revenue Service Building, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20224. Due to building security
procedures, visitors must enter at the
Constitution Avenue entrance. In
addition, all visitors must present photo
identification to enter the building.
Send Submissions to CC:PA:LPD:PR
(REG–127923–15), Room 5205, Internal
Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben
Franklin Station, Washington, DC
20044. Submissions may be handdelivered Monday through Friday to
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–127923–15),
Couriers Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20224 or sent
electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov (IRS–2016–0010).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the regulations, Theresa M.
Melchiorre at (202) 317–6859;
concerning submissions of comments,
the hearing and/or to be placed on the
building access list to attend the hearing
Regina Johnson at (202) 317–6901 (not
toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
subject of the public hearing is the
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–
127923–15) that was published in the
Federal Register on Friday, March 4,
2016 (81 FR 11486).
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3)
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish
to present oral comments at the hearing
that submitted written comments by
June 20, 2016 must submit an outline of
the topics to be addressed and the
amount of time to be devoted to each
topic by Monday, June 20, 2016.
A period of 10 minutes is allotted to
each person for presenting oral
comments. After the deadline for
receiving outlines has passed, the IRS
will prepare an agenda containing the
schedule of speakers. Copies of the
agenda will be made available, free of
charge, at the hearing or in the Freedom
of Information Reading Room (FOIA RR)
(Room 1621) which is located at the
11th and Pennsylvania Avenue NW.,
entrance, 1111 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20224.
Because of access restrictions, the IRS
will not admit visitors beyond the
immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jun 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
information about having your name
placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
Martin V. Franks,
Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch,
Legal Processing Division, Associate Chief
Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On March 10, 2016, The Patriots Point
Maritime Museum notified the Coast
Guard that it will be conducting a
fireworks display from 9 p.m. to 9:30
p.m. on July 4, 2016. The fireworks are
to be launched from a barge along the
bank of the Cooper River at Patriots
Point in Charleston, SC. Hazards from
firework displays include accidental
discharge of fireworks, dangerous
projectiles, and falling hot embers or
other debris. The Captain of the Port
Charleston (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with the
fireworks to be used in this display
would be a safety concern for anyone
within a 500-yard radius of the barge.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within a 500-yard
radius of the fireworks barge before,
during, and after the scheduled event.
The Coast Guard proposes this
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231.
[FR Doc. 2016–14010 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0224]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks
Patriots Point, Charleston, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a temporary safety zone in the
navigable waters of Charleston, SC. This
safety zone is necessary to protect the
public from hazards associated with
launching fireworks over navigable
waters of the United States. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit
persons and vessels from being in the
safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative. We invite
your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
SUMMARY:
Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 29, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2016–0224 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
DATES:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
John Downing, Sector Charleston Office
of Waterways Management, Coast
Guard; telephone (843) 740–3184, email
John.Z.Downing@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR
PO 00000
Code of Federal Regulations
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a
safety zone from 8:45 p.m. to 9:45 p.m.
on July 4, 2016. The safety zone would
cover all navigable waters within 500
yards of the barge located at Patriots
Point on the Cooper River. The duration
of the zone is intended to ensure the
safety of vessels and these navigable
waters before, during, and after the
scheduled 9 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. fireworks
display. No vessel or person would be
permitted to enter the safety zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
The regulatory text we are proposing
appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
E:\FR\FM\14JNP1.SGM
14JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This NPRM has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone.
Vessel traffic would be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which
would impact a small designated area of
the Atlantic Ocean for less than 1 hour
during the evening when vessel traffic is
normally low. Moreover, the Coast
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone, and the rule would
allow vessels to seek permission to enter
the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
rule would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will
not retaliate against small entities that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jun 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
If you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38639
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves a safety zone lasting less than
1 hour that would prohibit entry within
500 yards of the fireworks barge.
Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A
preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and Categorical Exclusion
Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
E:\FR\FM\14JNP1.SGM
14JNP1
38640
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Proposed Rules
and can be viewed by following that
Web site’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This rule will
be enforced on July 4, 2016 from 8:45
p.m. until 9:45 p.m.
Dated: May 31, 2016.
G.L. Tomasulo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2016–13996 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 49 and 52
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0782; FRL–9947–31–
OAR]
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
RIN 2060–AS56
Rescission of Preconstruction Permits
Issued Under the Clean Air Act
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
■
AGENCY:
§ 165.T07–0224 Safety zone; Fourth of July
fireworks Patriots Point, Charleston, SC.
SUMMARY:
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
2. Add temporary § 165.T07–0224 to
read as follows:
(a) This rule establishes a safety zone
on all Cooper River waters within a 500
yard radius of barge, from which
fireworks will be launched.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means Coast Guard
Patrol Commanders, including Coast
Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard
vessels, and Federal, state, and local
officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the
enforcement of the regulated areas.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated area
unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, or remain within
the regulated area may contact the
Captain of the Port Charleston by
telephone at 843–740–7050, or a
designated representative via VHF radio
on channel 16, to request authorization.
If authorization to enter, transit through,
or remain within the regulated area is
granted by the Captain of the Port
Charleston or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels
receiving such authorization must
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide
notice of the regulated area by Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:37 Jun 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
revise a limitation on the rescission of
stationary source preconstruction
permits that is contained in the federal
New Source Review (NSR) regulations.
This proposal would amend the EPA’s
federal Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD) regulations to
remove a date restriction from the
current permit rescission provision.
Other than removing the date
restriction, the proposed rule is not
intended to alter the circumstances
under which an NSR permit may be
rescinded. This proposal would also
add a corresponding permit rescission
provision in the federal regulations that
apply to major sources in nonattainment
areas of Indian country. This rule also
proposes to correct an outdated crossreference to another part of the
regulations.
Comments. Comments must be
received on or before July 14, 2016.
Public hearing. If anyone contacts us
requesting a public hearing on or before
June 20, 2016, we will hold a hearing.
Additional information about the
hearing, if requested, will be published
in a subsequent Federal Register
document.
DATES:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2015–0782, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the Web, Cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information on this proposed
rule, please contact Ms. Jessica
Montanez, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, by
phone at (919) 541–3407 or by email at
montanez.jessica@epa.gov. To request a
public hearing or information pertaining
to a public hearing on this document,
contact Ms. Pamela Long, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, by
phone at (919) 541–0641 or by email at
long.pam@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. How is this Federal Register
document organized?
The information presented in this
document is organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. How is this Federal Register document
organized?
B. Does this action apply to me?
C. What should I consider as I prepare my
comments for the EPA?
D. How can I find information about a
possible public hearing?
E. Where can I obtain a copy of this
document and other related information?
II. Overview of Action
III. Background
IV. Proposed Revisions
A. Removal of Date Restriction
B. Discretion of the Permitting Reviewing
Authority
C. Incorrect Cross Reference
D. Rescission Authority for NA NSR
Permits in Indian Country
E. Rescission Authority for Other Air
Permitting Programs
F. Public Notice
V. Implementation
VI. Environmental Justice Considerations
E:\FR\FM\14JNP1.SGM
14JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38638-38640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13996]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0224]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks Patriots Point, Charleston,
SC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
in the navigable waters of Charleston, SC. This safety zone is
necessary to protect the public from hazards associated with launching
fireworks over navigable waters of the United States. This proposed
rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in the safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 29, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2016-0224 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant John Downing, Sector
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843)
740-3184, email John.Z.Downing@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis
On March 10, 2016, The Patriots Point Maritime Museum notified the
Coast Guard that it will be conducting a fireworks display from 9 p.m.
to 9:30 p.m. on July 4, 2016. The fireworks are to be launched from a
barge along the bank of the Cooper River at Patriots Point in
Charleston, SC. Hazards from firework displays include accidental
discharge of fireworks, dangerous projectiles, and falling hot embers
or other debris. The Captain of the Port Charleston (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards associated with the fireworks to be
used in this display would be a safety concern for anyone within a 500-
yard radius of the barge.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels
and the navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of the fireworks
barge before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard
proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP proposes to establish a safety zone from 8:45 p.m. to 9:45
p.m. on July 4, 2016. The safety zone would cover all navigable waters
within 500 yards of the barge located at Patriots Point on the Cooper
River. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of
vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after the
scheduled 9 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. fireworks display. No vessel or person
would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The regulatory
text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
[[Page 38639]]
importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs,
of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not
been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would
impact a small designated area of the Atlantic Ocean for less than 1
hour during the evening when vessel traffic is normally low. Moreover,
the Coast Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM
marine channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to
seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a safety
zone lasting less than 1 hour that would prohibit entry within 500
yards of the fireworks barge. Normally such actions are categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD. A preliminary environmental analysis
checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
V. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov
[[Page 38640]]
and can be viewed by following that Web site's instructions.
Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email
alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule
is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T07-0224 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T07-0224 Safety zone; Fourth of July fireworks Patriots
Point, Charleston, SC.
(a) This rule establishes a safety zone on all Cooper River waters
within a 500 yard radius of barge, from which fireworks will be
launched.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty
officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and
Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated
areas.
(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston
or a designated representative.
(2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, or
remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at 843-740-7050, or a designated representative
via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization
to enter, transit through, or remain within the regulated area is
granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston
or a designated representative.
(3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene
designated representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This rule will be enforced on July 4, 2016
from 8:45 p.m. until 9:45 p.m.
Dated: May 31, 2016.
G.L. Tomasulo,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2016-13996 Filed 6-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P