Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, 38707-38709 [2016-13982]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
38707
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices
teachers and schools to integrate fitness
education and student recognition of
fitness achievement into the schools,
and barriers and facilitators relevant to
PYFP implementation. All PYFP
schools will complete cost and time use
worksheets. In addition, focus groups
with PE teachers, students, and parents
PYFP compared with a traditional PE
curriculum and gather information
critical for program improvement.
OMB approval is requested for two
years. Participation in the PYFP
Evaluation is voluntary and there are no
costs to respondents other than their
time.
will be conducted in a subset of 6 PYFP
schools. Focus groups will take place on
school grounds during or outside of the
school day, depending on availability of
a given respondent group.
The information collected for the
PYFP evaluation will allow the CDC and
partners to assess the impact of the
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondents
6th grade students in
PYFP Schools.
PE teachers in PYFP
Schools.
School administrators in
PYFP Schools.
Parents of 6th graders
enrolled in PE at
PYFP Schools.
6th grade students in
non-PYFP Schools.
PE teachers in nonPYFP Schools.
School Administrators in
non-PYFP Schools.
Total ........................
Total
burden
(in hrs)
615
125
615
30
22
12
6
6
6
30
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
15/60
30/60
15/60
1
25/60
1
30/60
20/60
1
1
308
125
154
30
9
12
3
2
6
30
FitnessGram® Data Collection Form ...................
Accelerometry Log ...............................................
Student Survey (non-PYFP Schools) ..................
PE Teacher Survey (non-PYFP Schools) ...........
615
125
615
22
2
2
1
1
15/60
30/60
15/60
20/60
308
125
154
8
(non-PYFP
6
1
20/60
2
..............................................................................
........................
........................
........................
1,276
School
Administrator
Schools).
[FR Doc. 2016–14016 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Jkt 238001
regulations. This authority must also be
exercised in accordance with the
Department’s established policies,
procedures, guidelines and regulations
and with all other pertinent issuances.
This delegation became effective upon
date of signature. In addition, I have
affirmed and ratified any actions taken
by the Director, CDC, or other CDC
officials which involve the exercise of
the authorities delegated herein prior to
the effective date of this delegation.
[FR Doc. 2016–13995 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]
Notice is hereby given that pursuant
to section 222 of the Public Health
Service Act [42 U.S.C. 217a], as
amended, I have delegated to the
Director, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC), authority to
appoint temporary members to the
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health’s Safety and
Occupational Health Study Section
(SOHSS).
These authorities shall be exercised
under the Department’s existing
delegation of authority and policy on
19:36 Jun 13, 2016
Survey
Dated: June 7, 2016.
Sylvia M. Burwell,
Secretary.
Advisory Councils or Committees;
Delegation of Authority
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Average
burden per
response
(in hrs)
FitnessGram® Data Collection Form ...................
Accelerometry Log ...............................................
Student Survey (PYFP Schools) .........................
Student Focus Group Moderator Guide ..............
PE Teacher Survey (PYFP Schools) ..................
PE Teacher Focus Group Moderator Guide .......
PYFP Time Use Worksheet ................................
School Administrator Survey (PYFP Schools) ....
PYFP Cost Worksheet ........................................
Parent Focus Group Moderator Guide ................
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Numner of
responses per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Form name
BILLING CODE 4160–18–P
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–16–16AOW; Docket No. CDC–2016–
0050]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
AGENCY:
The Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), as part of
its continuing effort to reduce public
burden and maximize the utility of
government information, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. This notice invites
comment on the CDC I-Catalyst
program. The I-Catalyst program is
intended to help CDC employees get
their ideas out of the starting blocks and
down the track through a discovery,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
38708
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices
ideation, and prototyping process. The
expected result is that CDC staff will be
empowered to implement innovative
strategies and solutions that create value
for a set of beneficiaries.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before August 15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CDC–2016–
0050 by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
Regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Mail: Leroy A. Richardson,
Information Collection Review Office,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS–
D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
Docket Number. All relevant comments
received will be posted without change
to Regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. For
access to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to
Regulations.gov.
Please note: All public comment should be
submitted through the Federal eRulemaking
portal (regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the
address listed above.
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
To
request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of
the information collection plan and
instruments, contact the Information
Collection Review Office, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, 1600
Clifton Road NE., MS–D74, Atlanta,
Georgia 30329; phone: 404–639–7570;
Email: omb@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal agencies
must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct
or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also
requires Federal agencies to provide a
60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed
extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of
previously approved information
collection before submitting the
collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are
publishing this notice of a proposed
data collection as described below.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Jun 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology; and (e) estimates of capital
or start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information. Burden means
the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal
agency. This includes the time needed
to review instructions; to develop,
acquire, install and utilize technology
and systems for the purpose of
collecting, validating and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; to train
personnel and to be able to respond to
a collection of information, to search
data sources, to complete and review
the collection of information; and to
transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
Proposed Project
CDC I-Catalyst Program—New—Office
of the Associate Director for Science,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The CDC Office of Technology and
Innovation (OTI) within Office of the
Associate Director for Science (OADS)
fosters innovative science and promotes
the testing and implementation of
innovative ideas that improve CDC’s
ability to have public health impact. To
arm CDC staff with an expanded skillset and tools to evaluate and translate
their insights and ideas into solutions,
CDC developed an experiential
innovation curriculum called I-Catalyst.
The program was created with the belief
that innovation should be customer
driven, be based on user research, and
is something people at all levels of an
organization can engage in.
The goal of the I-Catalyst program is
to help CDC employees test and explore
their ideas through a discovery,
ideation, and prototyping process. ICatalyst offers a process for defining
problems and developing strategies to
solutions that will help improve the
quality and efficiency of innovation
efforts and, as a result, overall
performance. Through the I-Catalyst
Program, teams work to define and
articulate their problem space to find
effective solutions. Participating teams
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
will go through a hypothesis-testing,
scientific method of discovery to gather
important insights and identify issues
associated with their projects. Teams are
forced ‘‘out of the classroom’’ to
conduct interviews, study customer/
stakeholder needs, collect feedback, and
find partnership opportunities. It is
expected that participants will leave the
program with the ability to evaluate and
translate their insights into solutions.
The I-Catalyst program provides CDC
staff with real-world, hands-on
entrepreneurship training. Through ICatalyst CDC staff make hypothesis
about how the world works, and then
test them by getting out of the building
and talking to customers and/or
stakeholders. Only conversations with
potential customers/stakeholders can
provide the facts from which
hypotheses are proven or disproven
about whether a solution (whether a
product, process, etc.) creates value for
the intended beneficiaries. Participants
have to go out into the world and learn
by doing. The process will engage
customers/stakeholders in a process that
will identify what they most value and
need and what their top barriers and
pain points are, and source solutions
that will have high levels of efficacy and
user acceptability.
I-Catalyst combines in-class lectures
with out-of-class learning and
interactions with various customers/
stakeholders. This curriculum requires
full participation from the entire team.
The program guides teams and
individuals through a series of
workshops that helps participants
articulate a problem, create evidencebased plan for assessment, and conduct
unstructured interviews with
customers/stakeholders. Ongoing
technical assistance and support from a
cadre of experts is provided to teams as
they define the problem, map their
operational model, and identify and
interact with customers/stakeholders.
Each team member must commit to indepth preparation, attendance at the
lectures and workshops, and at least 15
additional hours per week for customer
discovery.
Teams will be spending a significant
amount of time in between each of the
lectures outside the class talking to
customers. Each week teams will
conduct a minimum of five customer
interviews with individuals who
represent different segments of
customers/stakeholders whom they
expect will gain value through their
solution or will benefit from value
streams that are being produced by their
solution (in terms of social and/or
environmental impact). The types of
customers or stakeholders teams’
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
38709
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 14, 2016 / Notices
interview will be specific to the
proposed solution and context. For
example, teams may interview
government employees if the solution is
intended to improve how government
employees do their work. On the other
hand, teams may interview individuals
who work industry and businesses if the
teams determines that they are the
intended beneficiaries.
Using a generic information collection
plan, this data collection covers
qualitative information to be obtained
through on-site, unstructured interviews
with individuals who represent the
customers or stakeholders CDC teams
are attempting to serve or benefit. CDC
anticipates conducting I-Catalyst with
three cohorts of teams over the next two
years. With each I-Catalyst cohort teams
will interview their customers/
stakeholders for an average of 30
minutes. Each team will interview
approximately 50 respondents. With 8–
10 teams participating in each of the
three I-Catalyst training cohorts,
approximately 1,500 respondents will
be interviewed. Of these, approximately
40% of individuals will be internal
CDC/ATSDR staff and 60% will be
external partners, stakeholders, or
customers. Data to be collected includes
information regarding what they most
value and need and their top barriers
and pain points.
CDC expects that teams participating
in the I-Catalyst will be empowered to
implement innovative strategies and
solutions that create value for a set of
beneficiaries. The ultimate goal of the ICatalyst program is to give CDC staff
skills to successfully transfer knowledge
into value-based solutions that benefit
society and broaden the agency’s
impact.
Participation in the I-Catalyst
interviews is completely voluntary. A
three-year approval is requested. There
is no cost to respondents other than
their time.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of respondents
Cohort 1:
External Partners, Stakeholders, or Customers.
Cohort 2:
External Partners, Stakeholders, or Customers.
Cohort 3:
External Partners, Stakeholders, or Customers.
[FR Doc. 2016–13982 Filed 6–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity: Comment Request
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Projects
Title: National Study of Title IV–E
Child Welfare Waiver Demonstrations.
OMB No.: New Collection.
Description: The National Study of
the Title IV–E Child Welfare Waiver
Demonstrations is sponsored by the
Children’s Bureau, Administration for
Children and Families of the U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services and involves the conduct of a
cross-site study of jurisdictions (referred
to as waiver jurisdictions) approved to
operate demonstrations authorized by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:36 Jun 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
Average
burden per
response
(in hrs.)
Total
burden
(in hrs.)
Forms will not be used
500
1
1
500
Forms will not be used
500
1
1
500
Forms will not be used
500
1
1
500
........................
........................
........................
1,500
Total .......................................................
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office,
Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the
Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention.
Number of
responses
per
respondent
Number of
respondents
Form name
.......................................
section 1130 of the Social Security Act,
as amended by the Child and Family
Services Improvement and Innovation
Act, Public Law 112–34. The
demonstrations involve waivers of
certain provisions of the foster care
program authorized by title IV–E of the
Social Security Act. Child welfare
agencies in waiver jurisdictions are
operating demonstrations to implement
a variety of programs and interventions
that serve children and families in an
effort to improve their safety,
permanency, and well-being. Each
waiver jurisdiction is required to
conduct a third-party evaluation of its
demonstration.
The National Study will examine the
extent to which safety, permanency, and
well-being outcomes have improved for
children and families; the
characteristics of waiver jurisdictions
where improvements in outcomes have
occurred; expenditure patterns and the
types of activities for which waiver
jurisdictions have increased funding;
and the extent to which waiver
jurisdictions have experienced practice
and systems-level changes. The National
Study uses a mixed-method approach to
examine 25 waiver jurisdictions
(including 23 states, the District of
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Columbia and one tribal government)
with Terms and Conditions approved in
Federal Fiscal years 2012, 2013, and
2014. Proposed data collection methods
are two topically-focused telephone
surveys: (a) A telephone survey of
waiver jurisdiction representatives and
evaluators who are focused on
measuring well-being, and (b) a second
telephone survey of waiver jurisdiction
representatives and evaluators that is
focused on understanding practice and
systems-level changes within child
welfare service systems. Also proposed
is a Web-based survey of waiver
jurisdiction representatives and
evaluators that will look more broadly at
the implementation of waiver
demonstrations and corresponding
changes in child welfare policy,
practice, and financing. Data collected
through these instruments will be used
by the Children’s Bureau to gain an
understanding of the jurisdictions’
collective experience with
implementing their demonstrations.
Respondents: The respondents to the
Web-based survey will be a purposive
sample of an estimated 250 waiver
jurisdiction representatives and
evaluators drawn from the 25 waiver
jurisdictions with waiver demonstration
E:\FR\FM\14JNN1.SGM
14JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38707-38709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13982]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
[60Day-16-16AOW; Docket No. CDC-2016-0050]
Proposed Data Collection Submitted for Public Comment and
Recommendations
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notice with comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as part
of its continuing effort to reduce public burden and maximize the
utility of government information, invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. This notice invites comment on the CDC I-
Catalyst program. The I-Catalyst program is intended to help CDC
employees get their ideas out of the starting blocks and down the track
through a discovery,
[[Page 38708]]
ideation, and prototyping process. The expected result is that CDC
staff will be empowered to implement innovative strategies and
solutions that create value for a set of beneficiaries.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CDC-2016-
0050 by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Leroy A. Richardson, Information Collection Review
Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road
NE., MS-D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and Docket Number. All relevant comments received will be posted
without change to Regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to Regulations.gov.
Please note: All public comment should be submitted through the
Federal eRulemaking portal (regulations.gov) or by U.S. mail to the
address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To request more information on the
proposed project or to obtain a copy of the information collection plan
and instruments, contact the Information Collection Review Office,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., MS-
D74, Atlanta, Georgia 30329; phone: 404-639-7570; Email: omb@cdc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor. In addition, the PRA also requires
Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of information, including each new
proposed collection, each proposed extension of existing collection of
information, and each reinstatement of previously approved information
collection before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To
comply with this requirement, we are publishing this notice of a
proposed data collection as described below.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology; and (e) estimates of capital or start-
up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services
to provide information. Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; to develop, acquire,
install and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of
collecting, validating and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; to
train personnel and to be able to respond to a collection of
information, to search data sources, to complete and review the
collection of information; and to transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
Proposed Project
CDC I-Catalyst Program--New--Office of the Associate Director for
Science, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
The CDC Office of Technology and Innovation (OTI) within Office of
the Associate Director for Science (OADS) fosters innovative science
and promotes the testing and implementation of innovative ideas that
improve CDC's ability to have public health impact. To arm CDC staff
with an expanded skill-set and tools to evaluate and translate their
insights and ideas into solutions, CDC developed an experiential
innovation curriculum called I-Catalyst. The program was created with
the belief that innovation should be customer driven, be based on user
research, and is something people at all levels of an organization can
engage in.
The goal of the I-Catalyst program is to help CDC employees test
and explore their ideas through a discovery, ideation, and prototyping
process. I-Catalyst offers a process for defining problems and
developing strategies to solutions that will help improve the quality
and efficiency of innovation efforts and, as a result, overall
performance. Through the I-Catalyst Program, teams work to define and
articulate their problem space to find effective solutions.
Participating teams will go through a hypothesis-testing, scientific
method of discovery to gather important insights and identify issues
associated with their projects. Teams are forced ``out of the
classroom'' to conduct interviews, study customer/stakeholder needs,
collect feedback, and find partnership opportunities. It is expected
that participants will leave the program with the ability to evaluate
and translate their insights into solutions.
The I-Catalyst program provides CDC staff with real-world, hands-on
entrepreneurship training. Through I-Catalyst CDC staff make hypothesis
about how the world works, and then test them by getting out of the
building and talking to customers and/or stakeholders. Only
conversations with potential customers/stakeholders can provide the
facts from which hypotheses are proven or disproven about whether a
solution (whether a product, process, etc.) creates value for the
intended beneficiaries. Participants have to go out into the world and
learn by doing. The process will engage customers/stakeholders in a
process that will identify what they most value and need and what their
top barriers and pain points are, and source solutions that will have
high levels of efficacy and user acceptability.
I-Catalyst combines in-class lectures with out-of-class learning
and interactions with various customers/stakeholders. This curriculum
requires full participation from the entire team. The program guides
teams and individuals through a series of workshops that helps
participants articulate a problem, create evidence-based plan for
assessment, and conduct unstructured interviews with customers/
stakeholders. Ongoing technical assistance and support from a cadre of
experts is provided to teams as they define the problem, map their
operational model, and identify and interact with customers/
stakeholders. Each team member must commit to in-depth preparation,
attendance at the lectures and workshops, and at least 15 additional
hours per week for customer discovery.
Teams will be spending a significant amount of time in between each
of the lectures outside the class talking to customers. Each week teams
will conduct a minimum of five customer interviews with individuals who
represent different segments of customers/stakeholders whom they expect
will gain value through their solution or will benefit from value
streams that are being produced by their solution (in terms of social
and/or environmental impact). The types of customers or stakeholders
teams'
[[Page 38709]]
interview will be specific to the proposed solution and context. For
example, teams may interview government employees if the solution is
intended to improve how government employees do their work. On the
other hand, teams may interview individuals who work industry and
businesses if the teams determines that they are the intended
beneficiaries.
Using a generic information collection plan, this data collection
covers qualitative information to be obtained through on-site,
unstructured interviews with individuals who represent the customers or
stakeholders CDC teams are attempting to serve or benefit. CDC
anticipates conducting I-Catalyst with three cohorts of teams over the
next two years. With each I-Catalyst cohort teams will interview their
customers/stakeholders for an average of 30 minutes. Each team will
interview approximately 50 respondents. With 8-10 teams participating
in each of the three I-Catalyst training cohorts, approximately 1,500
respondents will be interviewed. Of these, approximately 40% of
individuals will be internal CDC/ATSDR staff and 60% will be external
partners, stakeholders, or customers. Data to be collected includes
information regarding what they most value and need and their top
barriers and pain points.
CDC expects that teams participating in the I-Catalyst will be
empowered to implement innovative strategies and solutions that create
value for a set of beneficiaries. The ultimate goal of the I-Catalyst
program is to give CDC staff skills to successfully transfer knowledge
into value-based solutions that benefit society and broaden the
agency's impact.
Participation in the I-Catalyst interviews is completely voluntary.
A three-year approval is requested. There is no cost to respondents
other than their time.
Estimated Annualized Burden Hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average
Number of Number of burden per Total burden
Type of respondents Form name respondents responses per response (in (in hrs.)
respondent hrs.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cohort 1:
External Partners, Forms will not 500 1 1 500
Stakeholders, or be used.
Customers.
Cohort 2:
External Partners, Forms will not 500 1 1 500
Stakeholders, or be used.
Customers.
Cohort 3:
External Partners, Forms will not 500 1 1 500
Stakeholders, or be used.
Customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total................. ................ .............. .............. .............. 1,500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leroy A. Richardson,
Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific
Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the
Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2016-13982 Filed 6-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
