Approval of Expansion of Subzone 78A; Nissan North America, Inc.; Smyrna, Tennessee, 38130-38131 [2016-13946]
Download as PDF
38130
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Notices
Board’s Web site, which is accessible
via www.trade.gov/ftz.
For further information, contact
Kathleen Boyce at Kathleen.Boyce@
trade.gov or at (202) 482–1346.
Dated: June 3, 2016.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–13919 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 2000]
Reorganization and Expansion of
Foreign-Trade Zone 21 Under
Alternative Site Framework;
Charleston, South Carolina
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) (15
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the
establishment or reorganization of
zones;
Whereas, the South Carolina State
Ports Authority, grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 21, submitted an
application to the Board (FTZ Docket B–
14–2015, docketed February 25, 2015)
for authority to reorganize and expand
under the ASF with a service area of the
Counties of Charleston, Berkeley,
Dorchester, Orangeburg, Williamsburg,
Georgetown, Horry (portion), Florence
(portion), Marion (portion), Colleton,
Jasper, Hampton and Beaufort, in and
adjacent to the Charleston (South
Carolina), Georgetown (South Carolina)
and Savannah (Georgia) Customs and
Border Protection ports of entry, FTZ
21’s existing Sites 5 (as modified), 9, 16
and 18 would be categorized as magnet
sites, and the grantee proposes seven
initial usage-driven sites (Sites 6, 15, 26,
28, 30, 31 and 32);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (80 FR 11632–11633, March 4,
2015) and the application has been
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendation of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations are satisfied if
approval of the service area is limited to
the Counties of Charleston, Berkeley,
Dorchester, Orangeburg, Williamsburg,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:48 Jun 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
Georgetown, Colleton, Jasper, Hampton
and Beaufort;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize and
expand FTZ 21 under the ASF is
approved with a service area of the
Counties of Charleston, Berkeley,
Dorchester, Orangeburg, Williamsburg,
Georgetown, Colleton, Jasper, Hampton
and Beaufort, subject to the FTZ Act and
the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.13, to the Board’s standard
2,000-acre activation limit for the zone,
to an ASF sunset provision for magnet
sites that would terminate authority for
Sites 9, 16 and 18 if not activated within
five years from the month of approval,
and to an ASF sunset provision for
usage-driven sites that would terminate
authority for Sites 6, 15, 26, 28, 30, 31
and 32 if no foreign-status merchandise
is admitted for a bona fide customs
purpose within three years from the
month of approval.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
June 2016.
Paul Piquado, Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–13947 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 1999]
Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone
38 (Expansion of Service Area) Under
Alternative Site Framework,
Spartanburg County, South Carolina
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Board adopted the
alternative site framework (ASF) (15
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the
establishment or reorganization of
zones;
Whereas, the South Carolina State
Ports Authority, grantee of ForeignTrade Zone 38, submitted an
application to the Board (FTZ Docket B–
80–2015, docketed November 18, 2015)
for authority to expand the service area
of the zone to include Pickens,
Greenwood, and Abbeville Counties, as
described in the application, adjacent to
the Greenville/Spartanburg Customs
and Border Protection port of entry;
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment was given in the Federal
Register (80 FR 73700–73701,
November 25, 2015) and the application
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
has been processed pursuant to the FTZ
Act and the Board’s regulations; and,
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s report, and finds that the
requirements of the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations are satisfied;
Now, Therefore, the Board hereby
orders:
The application to reorganize FTZ 38
to expand the service area under the
ASF is approved, subject to the FTZ Act
and the Board’s regulations, including
Section 400.13, and to the Board’s
standard 2,000-acre activation limit for
the zone.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2 day of
June 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
[FR Doc. 2016–13924 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 2002]
Approval of Expansion of Subzone
78A; Nissan North America, Inc.;
Smyrna, Tennessee
Pursuant to its authority under the ForeignTrade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the ForeignTrade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the
following Order:
Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act
provides for ‘‘. . . the establishment
. . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of
entry of the United States, to expedite
and encourage foreign commerce, and
for other purposes,’’ and authorizes the
Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant to
qualified corporations the privilege of
establishing foreign-trade zones in or
adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border
Protection ports of entry;
Whereas, the Board’s regulations (15
CFR part 400) provide for the
establishment of subzones for specific
uses;
Whereas, the Metropolitan
Government of Nashville and Davidson
County, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone
78, has made application to the Board
to expand Subzone 78A on behalf of
Nissan North America, Inc., located in
Smyrna, Tennessee (FTZ Docket B–84–
2015, docketed December 23, 2015);
Whereas, notice inviting public
comment has been given in the Federal
Register (81 FR 63, January 4, 2016) and
the application has been processed
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board’s
regulations; and,
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
13JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Notices
Whereas, the Board adopts the
findings and recommendations of the
examiner’s memorandum, and finds that
the requirements of the FTZ Act and the
Board’s regulations are satisfied;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby
approves the expansion of Subzone 78A
on behalf of Nissan North America, Inc.,
as described in the application and
Federal Register notice, subject to the
FTZ Act and the Board’s regulations,
including Section 400.13.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
June 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016–13946 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request; Correction
Agency: International Trade
Administration (ITA). Department of
Commerce.
Title: Procedures for Importation of
Supplies for Use in Emergency Relief
Work.
OMB Control Number: 0625–0256.
Type of Request: Regular Submission.
In the Federal Register of April 11,
2016, FR Vol. 81, No, 69, Page 21315–
21316, under Section II. ‘‘Method of
Collection,’’ the second line in the
paragraph after Attention: should read
‘‘Enforcement and Compliance’’ instead
of ‘‘Import Administration.’’
Dated: June 8, 2016.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–13859 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–FP–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
[A–570–036]
Certain Biaxial Integral Geogrid
Products from the People’s Republic
of China: Postponement of Preliminary
Determination of Antidumping Duty
Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: June 13, 2016.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:48 Jun 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
Julia
Hancock or Susan Pulongbarit, AD/CVD
Operations, Office V, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1394, or (202)
482–4031, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Postponement of Preliminary
Determination
1 See Certain Biaxial Integral Geogrid Products
from the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Investigation, 81 FR 7755
(February 16, 2016).
2 See Letter to the Secretary of Commerce from
Petitioner ‘‘Request to Postpone Preliminary
Determination’’ (May 27, 2016).
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: June 7, 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016–13953 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–489–501]
On February 16, 2016, the Department
of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published
a notice initiating an antidumping duty
investigation of certain biaxial integral
geogrid products from the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 Section
733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (‘‘the Act’’), and 19 CFR
351.205(b)(1) state that the Department
will make a preliminary determination
no later than 140 days after the date of
the initiation (i.e., February 8, 2016).
Accordingly, the preliminary
determination of this antidumping duty
investigation is currently due no later
than June 27, 2016.
On May 27, 2016, Tensar Corporation
(‘‘Petitioner’’), made a timely request,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(e), for
postponement of the preliminary
determination, in order to facilitate the
Department’s analysis of respondents’
questionnaire responses and interested
parties’ surrogate value data
submissions. Because there are no
compelling reasons to deny the request,
in accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A)
of the Act, the Department is postponing
the deadline for the preliminary
determination by 50 days.2
For the reasons stated above, the
Department, in accordance with section
733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, is postponing
the deadline for the preliminary
determination to no later than 190 days
after the date on which the Department
initiated this investigation. Therefore,
the new deadline for the preliminary
determination is August 16, 2016. In
accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the
Act, the deadline for the final
determination of this investigation will
continue to be 75 days after the date of
the preliminary determination, unless
postponed at a later date.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
PO 00000
38131
Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe
and Tube Products From Turkey:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, and
Partial Rescission of Review; 20142015
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request by
interested parties,1 the Department of
Commerce (the Department) is
conducting an administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on welded
carbon steel standard pipe and tube
products (welded pipe and tube) from
Turkey.2 The period of review (POR) is
May 1, 2014, to April 30, 2015. 3 The
AGENCY:
1 Wheatland Tube Company, Borusan
Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S., and
Borusan Istikbal Ticaret requested the instant
administrative review.
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR
37588 (July 1, 2015) (Initiation Notice). The
Department subsequently published a second
initiation notice to correct the spelling of two
company names in that notice. See Initiation of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 45947 (August 3,
2015).
3 This review covers the following companies:
Borusan Istikbal Ticaret T.A.S. and Borusan
Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S.
(collectively, Borusan); Toscelik Profil ve Sac
Endustrisi A.S. and Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S.
(collectively, Toscelik); Toscelik Metal Ticaret A.S.
(Toscelik Metal);1 Borusan Birlesik Boru Fabrikalari
San ve Tic (Borusan Birlesik); Borusan Gemlik Boru
Tesisleri A.S. (Borusan Gemlik); Borusan Ihracat
Ithalat ve Dagitim A.S. (Borusan Ihracat); Borusan
Ithicat ve Dagitim A.S. (Borusan Ithicat); Tubeco
Pipe and Steel Corporation (Tubeco); Erbosan
Erciyas Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (Erbosan); and
Yucel Boru ve Profil Endustrisi A.S., Yucelboru
Ihracat Ithalat ve Pazarlama A.S., and Cayirova
Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. (collectively, the Yucel
Group).
We note that in prior segments of this proceeding,
we treated Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S.,
Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S., and Toscelik Metal as the
same legal entity. See, e.g., Welded Carbon Steel
Standard Pipe and Tube Products From Turkey:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 71087, 71088 n.8
(December 1, 2014). However, in a prior review, we
found that Toscelik Metal has ceased to exist. Id.
There is no record evidence for altering this
treatment. Therefore, for these preliminary results,
we are treating Toscelik and Tosyali as the same
legal entity, and continue to find that Toscelik
E:\FR\FM\13JNN1.SGM
Continued
13JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38130-38131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13946]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[Order No. 2002]
Approval of Expansion of Subzone 78A; Nissan North America, Inc.;
Smyrna, Tennessee
Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
Whereas, the Foreign-Trade Zones Act provides for ``. . . the
establishment . . . of foreign-trade zones in ports of entry of the
United States, to expedite and encourage foreign commerce, and for
other purposes,'' and authorizes the Foreign-Trade Zones Board to grant
to qualified corporations the privilege of establishing foreign-trade
zones in or adjacent to U.S. Customs and Border Protection ports of
entry;
Whereas, the Board's regulations (15 CFR part 400) provide for the
establishment of subzones for specific uses;
Whereas, the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson
County, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 78, has made application to the
Board to expand Subzone 78A on behalf of Nissan North America, Inc.,
located in Smyrna, Tennessee (FTZ Docket B-84-2015, docketed December
23, 2015);
Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the
Federal Register (81 FR 63, January 4, 2016) and the application has
been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations;
and,
[[Page 38131]]
Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the
examiner's memorandum, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act
and the Board's regulations are satisfied;
Now, therefore, the Board hereby approves the expansion of Subzone
78A on behalf of Nissan North America, Inc., as described in the
application and Federal Register notice, subject to the FTZ Act and the
Board's regulations, including Section 400.13.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of June 2016.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance,
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-13946 Filed 6-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P