Amendment of Restricted Areas R-6602A, R-6602B, and R-6602C; Fort Pickett, VA, 38069-38070 [2016-13934]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations The Special Conditions Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of the type certification basis for Ultramagic, S.A., balloon models F–18, H–56, H–65, H– 77, M–56, M–56C, M–65, M–65C, M–77, M–77C, M–90, M–105, M–120, M–130, M–145, M–160, N–180, N–210, N–250, N–300, N–355, N–425, S–70, S–90, S– 105, S–130, S–160, T–150, T–180, T– 210, V–56, V–65, V–77, V–90, V–105, and Z–90 modified by Ultramagic, S.A. 1. Certification of the MK–32 Burner Series under 14 CFR part 31. (a) In addition to the provisions of part 31, amendment 7, the applicant must design the MK–32 Burner to comply with the requirements, as described below, with respect to the igniter oxygen augmentation system and hydraulic burner valve actuation system: Oxygen Distribution System (1) Except for flexible lines from oxygen outlets to the dispensing units, or where shown to be otherwise suitable to the installation, nonmetallic tubing must not be used for any oxygen line that is normally pressurized during flight. (2) Nonmetallic oxygen distribution lines must not be routed where they may be subjected to elevated temperatures, electrical arcing, and released flammable fluids that might result from any probable failure. Fire Protection for Oxygen Equipment Oxygen equipment and lines must: (1) Not be installed in any designated fire zones. (2) Be protected from heat that may be generated in, or escape from, any designated fire zone. (3) Be installed so that escaping oxygen cannot come in contact with and cause ignition of grease, fluid, or vapor accumulations that are present in normal operation or that may result from the failure or malfunction of any other system. mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES Protection of Oxygen Equipment From Rupture (1) Each element of the oxygen system must have sufficient strength to withstand the maximum pressure and temperature, in combination with any externally applied loads arising from consideration of limit structural loads that may be acting on that part of the system. (2) Oxygen pressure sources and the lines between the source and the shutoff means must be: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:33 Jun 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 (i) Protected from unsafe temperatures; and (ii) Located where the probability and hazard of rupture in a crash landing are minimized. (1) Design. Each hydraulic system must be designed as follows: (i) Each hydraulic system and its elements must withstand, without yielding, the structural loads expected in addition to hydraulic loads. (ii) A means to indicate the pressure in each hydraulic system which supplies two or more primary functions must be provided to the flight crew. (iii) There must be means to ensure that the pressure, including transient (surge) pressure, in any part of the system will not exceed the safe limit above design operating pressure and to prevent excessive pressure resulting from fluid volumetric changes in all lines which are likely to remain closed long enough for such changes to occur. (iv) The minimum design burst pressure must be 2.5 times the operating pressure. (2) Tests. Each system must be substantiated by proof pressure tests. When proof tested, no part of any system may fail, malfunction, or experience a permanent set. The proof load of each system must be at least 1.5 times the maximum operating pressure of that system. (3) Accumulators. A hydraulic accumulator or reservoir may be installed on the engine side of any firewall, if— (i) It is an integral part of an engine or propeller system; or (ii) The reservoir is nonpressurized and the total capacity of all such nonpressurized reservoirs is one quart or less. (b) Ultramagic, through EASA, will provide the FAA with all Airworthiness Directives issued against the changed type design, if any, and a plan for resolving the unsafe conditions for the FAA type design. Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 25, 2016. Pat Mullen, Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2016–13556 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P Frm 00009 Fmt 4700 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 73 [Docket No. FAA–2016–7005; Airspace Docket No. 16–AEA–4] Hydraulic Systems PO 00000 38069 Sfmt 4700 RIN 2120–AA66 Amendment of Restricted Areas R– 6602A, R–6602B, and R–6602C; Fort Pickett, VA Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This action updates the using agency information for restricted areas R–6602A, R–6602B, and R–6602C, Fort Pickett, VA. This is an administrative change to reflect the current organization tasked with using agency responsibilities for the restricted areas. It does not affect the boundaries, designated altitudes, time of designation or activities conducted within the restricted areas. DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, September 15, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace Policy Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Authority for This Rulemaking The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it updates the using agency for restricted areas R–6602A, R–6602B and R–6602C; Fort Pickett, VA, to reflect the current organization responsible for the restricted areas. The Rule This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 73 by updating the using agency name for restricted areas R–6602A, R–6602B and R–6602C; Fort Pickett, VA, by removing E:\FR\FM\13JNR1.SGM 13JNR1 38070 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations the words ‘‘Commander, Fort Lee, VA,’’ and adding the words ‘‘Virginia National Guard, Commander, Fort Pickett, VA.’’ The name change reflects the current organization assigned using agency responsibilities for the restricted areas. This is an administrative change that does not affect the boundaries, designated altitudes, or activities conducted within the restricted areas; therefore, notice and public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary. Regulatory Notices and Analyses The FAA has determined that this action only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Environmental Review The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, paragraph 5– 6.5.d. This airspace action is an administrative change to the description of restricted areas R–6602A, R–6602B and R–6602C; Fort Pickett, VA, to update the using agency name. It does not alter the dimensions, altitudes, time of designation, or use of the airspace; therefore, it is not expected to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exists that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment. mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73 Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted areas. Adoption of the Amendment In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 73, as follows: PART 73—SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE 1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows: ■ VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:33 Jun 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. § 73.66 [Amended] 2. Section 73.66 is amended as follows: * * * * * ■ R–6602A Fort Pickett, VA [Amended] By removing the words ‘‘Using agency. Commander, Fort Lee, VA’’ and adding in their place ‘‘Using agency. Virginia National Guard, Commander, Fort Pickett, VA.’’ R–6602B Fort Pickett, VA [Amended] By removing the words ‘‘Using agency. Commander, Fort Lee, VA’’ and adding in their place ‘‘Using agency. Virginia National Guard, Commander, Fort Pickett, VA.’’ R–6602C Fort Pickett, VA [Amended] By removing the words ‘‘Using agency. Commander, Fort Lee, VA’’ and adding in their place ‘‘Using agency. Virginia National Guard, Commander, Fort Pickett, VA.’’ * * * * * Issued in Washington, DC, on June 6, 2016. Leslie M. Swann, Acting Manager, Airspace Policy Group. [FR Doc. 2016–13934 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives 27 CFR Part 478 [Docket No. ATF 2015R–26; AG Order No. 3681–2016] RIN 1140–AA50 Recordkeeping Regulations Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), Department of Justice. ACTION: Final rule; technical amendments. AGENCY: This final rule makes technical amendments to regulations pertaining to certain firearms recordkeeping requirements to provide clarity and enhance uniformity. The technical changes are being made in the wording of three tables to reflect the same wording in the body of the regulations associated with the tables regarding the required description of firearms for recordkeeping purposes. DATES: This rule is effective June 13, 2016. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shermaine Kenner, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Enforcement Programs and Services, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice, 99 New York Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226; telephone: (202) 648–7070 (this is not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) administers regulations published in 27 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 478. ATF has identified three technical amendments needed to provide clarity and uniformity to the recordkeeping requirements prescribed in 27 CFR 478.125(e) and (f)(1) and 478.125a(a)(4) and the tables titled, ‘‘Firearms Acquisition and Disposition Record,’’ ‘‘Firearms Collectors Acquisition and Disposition Record,’’ and ‘‘Disposition Record of Personal Firearms,’’ associated with §§ 478.125(e) and (f)(2), and 478.125a(a)(4) respectively. Specifically, there is a discrepancy between the wording used in the body of the regulations found at §§ 478.125(e) and (f)(1) and 478.125a(a)(4) and the wording used in the tables, listed above, regarding the required description of firearms for recordkeeping purposes. The regulations at §§ 478.125(e) and (f)(1) and 478.125a(a)(4) prescribe substantive recordkeeping requirements for the receipt and disposition of firearms by certain licensed parties, to include the prescribed format for recording required information. Specifically, licensed parties must record ‘‘the name of the manufacturer and importer (if any)’’ associated with the firearms acquired and disposed of by the licensed party. The regulations at §§ 478.125(e) and (f)(2) and 478.125a(a)(4) include tables that illustrate the format required for recording the receipt and disposition of firearms. ATF has identified a discrepancy between the language used in the body of these regulations, which requires a record of, inter alia, ‘‘the name of the manufacturer and importer (if any)’’ and the language used in the corresponding tables, which calls for the ‘‘manufacturer and/or importer.’’ Therefore, these tables associated with §§ 478.125(e) and (f) and 478.125a(a)(4) are being amended to ensure agreement between the wording in the tables with the wording in the body of the regulations by replacing ‘‘Manufacturer and/or importer’’ with ‘‘Manufacturer and importer (if any).’’ E:\FR\FM\13JNR1.SGM 13JNR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38069-38070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13934]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 73

[Docket No. FAA-2016-7005; Airspace Docket No. 16-AEA-4]
RIN 2120-AA66


Amendment of Restricted Areas R-6602A, R-6602B, and R-6602C; Fort 
Pickett, VA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action updates the using agency information for 
restricted areas R-6602A, R-6602B, and R-6602C, Fort Pickett, VA. This 
is an administrative change to reflect the current organization tasked 
with using agency responsibilities for the restricted areas. It does 
not affect the boundaries, designated altitudes, time of designation or 
activities conducted within the restricted areas.

DATES: Effective date: 0901 UTC, September 15, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace Policy Group, 
Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is 
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's 
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in 
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the 
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the 
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient 
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority 
as it updates the using agency for restricted areas R-6602A, R-6602B 
and R-6602C; Fort Pickett, VA, to reflect the current organization 
responsible for the restricted areas.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 
part 73 by updating the using agency name for restricted areas R-6602A, 
R-6602B and R-6602C; Fort Pickett, VA, by removing

[[Page 38070]]

the words ``Commander, Fort Lee, VA,'' and adding the words ``Virginia 
National Guard, Commander, Fort Pickett, VA.'' The name change reflects 
the current organization assigned using agency responsibilities for the 
restricted areas. This is an administrative change that does not affect 
the boundaries, designated altitudes, or activities conducted within 
the restricted areas; therefore, notice and public procedure under 5 
U.S.C. 553(b) are unnecessary.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this action only involves an 
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and 
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. 
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT 
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); 
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the 
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that 
only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified 
that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of 
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical 
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance 
with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures, 
paragraph 5-6.5.d. This airspace action is an administrative change to 
the description of restricted areas R-6602A, R-6602B and R-6602C; Fort 
Pickett, VA, to update the using agency name. It does not alter the 
dimensions, altitudes, time of designation, or use of the airspace; 
therefore, it is not expected to cause any potentially significant 
environmental impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exists that 
warrant preparation of an environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 73

    Airspace, Prohibited areas, Restricted areas.

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation 
Administration amends 14 CFR part 73, as follows:

PART 73--SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.


Sec.  73.66  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.66 is amended as follows:
* * * * *


R-6602A Fort Pickett, VA  [Amended]

    By removing the words ``Using agency. Commander, Fort Lee, VA'' and 
adding in their place ``Using agency. Virginia National Guard, 
Commander, Fort Pickett, VA.''


R-6602B Fort Pickett, VA  [Amended]

    By removing the words ``Using agency. Commander, Fort Lee, VA'' and 
adding in their place ``Using agency. Virginia National Guard, 
Commander, Fort Pickett, VA.''


R-6602C Fort Pickett, VA  [Amended]

    By removing the words ``Using agency. Commander, Fort Lee, VA'' and 
adding in their place ``Using agency. Virginia National Guard, 
Commander, Fort Pickett, VA.''
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 6, 2016.
Leslie M. Swann,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2016-13934 Filed 6-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.