Airworthiness Directives; PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Airplanes, 38115-38117 [2016-13854]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
paragraphs (h)(4)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. An AMOC is required
for any deviations to RC steps, including
substeps and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Eric Igama, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130L,
FAA, Los Angeles ACO, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712–4137;
phone: 562–627–5388; fax: 562–627–5210;
email: roderick.igama@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, MC
D800–0019, Long Beach, CA 90846–0001;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 2; fax
206–766–5683; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on June 3,
2016.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–13734 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–7048; Directorate
Identifier 2016–CE–014–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; PILATUS
AIRCRAFT LTD. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Models PC–
12, PC–12/45, PC–12/47, and PC–12/
47E airplanes installed with an affected
engine mounting frame assembly. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Jun 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as longitudinal
material separation on the internal
surface of the engine mounting frame
assembly tubes. We are issuing this
proposed AD to require actions to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd., Customer Support PC–12,
CH–6371 Stans, Switzerland; phone:
+41 41 619 33 33; fax: +41 41 619 73
11; email: SupportPC12@pilatusaircraft.com; Internet: www.pilatusaircraft.com. You may review this
referenced service information at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–
4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2016–7048; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38115
4059; fax: (816) 329–4090; email:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2016–7048; Directorate Identifier
2016–CE–014–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD No.
2016–0081, dated April 25, 2016
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
correct an unsafe condition for
PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Models PC–
12, PC–12/45, PC–12/47, and PC–12/
47E airplanes and was based on
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information originated by an aviation
authority of another country. The MCAI
states:
The PC–12 Engine Mounting Frame
Assembly (hereafter referred to as ‘‘EMF’’ in
this AD), Part Number (P/N) 571.20.12.036, is
a welded structure including three special
tubes, P/N 571.20.12.073, P/N 571.20.12.074
and P/N 571.20.12.107, the ends of which are
subject to a special swaging process during
manufacturing. Longitudinal material
separation on the internal surface of the
special tubes was detected on few EMFs on
new production aeroplanes. Investigations
identified the root cause to be an incorrect
accomplishment of the swaging process.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to growth of the
material separation and subsequent partial or
complete failure of the structural joint,
possibly resulting in in-flight detachment of
the engine and consequent reduced control,
or loss of control, of the aeroplane.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
Pilatus issued Service Bulletin (SB) No. 71–
009, now at Revision 2 (hereafter referred to
as ‘‘the SB’’ in this AD), to provide
inspection instructions for the affected EMF
to detect indications of material separation.
For the reason described above, this AD
requires identification and inspection of the
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
38116
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
affected EMF and, depending on the findings,
their replacement with serviceable EMF.
You may examine the MCAI on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2016–7048.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. has issued
PILATUS PC–12 Service Bulletin No:
71–009, Reference No: 345,
Modification No: EC–15–0632, Revision
2, dated March 18, 2016; Pilatus
Powerplant Mounting Frame, Removal/
Installation, Date module/Technical
publication 12–A–71–00–05–00A–
920A–A, dated February 26, 2010,
found in Pilatus Model type—PC–12,
PC–12/45, PC–12/47 MSN–101–888
Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM),
Document No. 02049, 12–A–AM–00–
00–00–I; and Pilatus Powerplant
Mounting Frame, Removal/Installation,
Date module/Technical publication 12–
B–71–00–05–00A–920A–A, dated
October 4, 2010, found in Pilatus Model
type—PC–12/47E MSN–1001–UP
Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM),
Document No. 02300, 12–B–AM–00–
00–00–I. The service information
describes procedures for determining if
an affected engine mounting frame
assembly (EMF) is installed, inspecting
the EMF, and replacing the EMF with a
serviceable EMF. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 888 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Jun 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
operators to be $226,440, or $255 per
product.
In addition, we estimate that any
necessary follow-on actions would cost
the following amounts. We have no way
of determining the number of products
that may need these actions.
The visual and eddy current
inspections would take about 3 workhours for a cost of $255 per product.
The replacement of the EMF would
take about 90 work-hours and require
parts costing $33,336, for a cost of
$40,986 per product.
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this proposed AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a
result, we have included all costs in our
cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
■
PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD: Docket No. FAA–
2016–7048; Directorate Identifier 2016–
CE–014–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 28,
2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to PILATUS AIRCRAFT
LTD. Models PC–12, PC–12/45, PC–12/47,
and PC–12/47E airplanes, all serial numbers,
that are:
(1) Installed with an affected serial number
engine mounting frame assembly (EMF), part
number (P/N) 571.20.12.036, listed in figure
1 of paragraph (c)(1) of this AD; and
FIGURE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (c)(1) OF
THIS AD—EMF P/N 571.20.12.036,
AFFECTED SERIAL NUMBERS
0001 through 1200 inclusive.
1202 through 1272 inclusive.
1275 through 1323 inclusive.
1325 through 1328 inclusive.
1334 through 1338 inclusive.
1340 and 1342.
1344 through 1346 inclusive.
1348 and 1349.
1358, 1361, and 1365.
(2) Certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 71: Power Plant.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 113 / Monday, June 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules
describes the unsafe condition as
longitudinal material separation on the
internal surface of the engine mounting frame
assembly tubes (EMF). We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct material separation
on the internal surface of the engine
mounting frame assembly tubes, which could
lead to partial or complete failure of the
structural joint and possibly result in inflight detachment of the engine with
consequent loss of control.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Do the actions in paragraphs (f)(1) through
(7) of this AD. If paragraphs (f)(1) through (6)
of this AD have already been done before the
effective date of this AD, then only paragraph
(f)(7) of this AD applies.
(1) Within the compliance time identified
in figure 2 of paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, do
an ultrasonic inspection of the swaged engine
mounting tube ends of the affected EMF
following the instructions of paragraph
3.B.(1) of PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD
PILATUS PC–12 Service Bulletin No: 71–
009, Reference No: 345, Modification No:
EC–15–0632, Revision 2, dated March 18,
2016.
FIGURE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (f)(1) OF
THIS AD—INITIAL COMPLIANCE TIME
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
A or B, whichever occurs later:
A Before the EMF exceeds 11,000 hours
time-in-service (TIS) or 13,500 flight cycles (FC), whichever occurs first since
first installation of the EMF on an airplane.
B Within 1,000 hours TIS or 1,000 FC or
6 months, whichever occurs first after
the effective date of this AD.
(2) If an indication with an echo of less
than 40 percent full screen height is detected
on an EMF during the ultrasonic inspection
required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, except
for paragraph (f)(7), no further actions are
required for this AD. Document compliance
with this AD in the maintenance records.
(3) If an indication with an echo of 40
percent full screen height or more is detected
on an EMF during the ultrasonic inspection
required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, do the
actions in paragraphs (f)(3)(i) through (iii) of
this AD, as applicable.
(i) Before further flight and repetitively
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 600 hours
TIS or 12 months, whichever occurs first, do
a visual inspection of the welding and do an
eddy current inspection of the tubes at the
indication point detected during the
ultrasonic inspection. Use the instructions of
paragraphs 3.B.(2) and 3.B.(3) of PILATUS
AIRCRAFT LTD PILATUS PC–12 Service
Bulletin No: 71–009, Reference No: 345,
Modification No: EC–15–0632, Revision 2,
dated March 18, 2016.
(ii) If any cracks are found during any of
the visual inspections or if an indication with
a signal of 20 percent or more is detected
during any of the eddy current inspections
required in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this AD,
before further flight, replace the EMF with a
serviceable EMF following the instructions in
the service information listed in paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:50 Jun 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
(f)(5) of this AD, including all subparagraphs
as applicable.
(iii) Unless already done as required by
paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of this AD, within 1,800
hours TIS or 36 months after the initial visual
and eddy current inspections of the affected
EMF required by paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this
AD, whichever occurs first, replace the EMF
with a serviceable EMF following the
instructions in the service information listed
in paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, including all
subparagraphs as applicable.
(4) For the purpose of this AD, a
serviceable EMF is defined as any EMF that
is not listed in figure 1 of paragraph (c)(1) of
this AD or an affected EMF that is listed in
figure 1 of paragraph (c)(1) of this AD but has
had the ultrasonic inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD and had an
indication with an echo of less than 40
percent full screen height.
(5) For replacement of the EMF, follow the
instructions listed in paragraphs (f)(5)(i) and
(ii), as applicable.
(i) For Models PC–12, PC–12/45, and PC–
12/47, manufacturer serial numbers (MSN)
101–888: Pilatus Powerplant Mounting
Frame, Removal/Installation, Date module/
Technical publication 12–A–71–00–05–00A–
920A–A, dated February 26, 2010, found in
Pilatus Model type—PC–12, PC–12/45, PC–
12/47 MSN–101–888 Aircraft Maintenance
Manual (AMM), Document No. 02049, 12–A–
AM–00–00–00–I.
(ii) For Model PC–12/47E, MSN 1001 and
up: Pilatus Powerplant Mounting Frame,
Removal/Installation, Date module/Technical
publication 12–B–71–00–05–00A–920A–A,
dated October 4, 2010, found in Pilatus
Model type—PC–12/47E MSN–1001–UP
Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM),
Document No. 02300, 12–B–AM–00–00–00–
I.
(6) If an EMF has an indication with an
echo of 40 percent or more during the
ultrasonic inspection required in paragraph
(f)(1) of this AD, you may replace the EMF
with a serviceable EMF in lieu of the visual
or eddy current inspections required in
paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this AD. For
replacement of the EMF, follow the
instructions in the service information listed
in paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, including all
subparagraphs as applicable.
(7) As of the effective date of this AD, do
not install an EMF P/N 571.20.12.036 unless
it has been determined to be a serviceable
EMF as specified in paragraph (f)(4) of this
AD.
(8) Airplanes with an MSN of 1556 or
higher are not affected by this AD provided
that the EMF has not been replaced since its
manufacture. A review of the maintenance
records, Airworthiness Approval Tag (FAA
Form 8130–3), or other positive form of parts
identification such as a shipping ticket,
invoice, or direct ship authority letter, can be
used to determine the serial number of the
EMF.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
38117
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329–
4090; email: doug.rudolph@faa.gov. Before
using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your
appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the
FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer or other source,
use these actions if they are FAA-approved.
Corrective actions are considered FAAapproved if they are approved by the State
of Design Authority (or their delegated
agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(h) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2016–0081,
dated April 25, 2016, for related information
pertaining to this AD.
(2) You may examine the MCAI on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2016–7048. For service information related to
this AD, contact Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.,
Customer Support PC–12, CH–6371 Stans,
Switzerland; phone: +41 41 619 33 33; fax:
+41 41 619 73 11; email: SupportPC12@
pilatus-aircraft.com; Internet: www.pilatusaircraft.com.
(3) You may review this referenced service
information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 3,
2016.
Melvin Johnson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–13854 Filed 6–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
29 CFR Part 1910
[Docket No. OSHA–2008–0012]
RIN 1218–AC40
Tree Care Operations
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Department of
Labor.
ACTION: Notice of stakeholder meeting.
AGENCY:
OSHA invites interested
parties to participate in an informal
stakeholder meeting concerning tree
care operations on July 13, 2016, in
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13JNP1.SGM
13JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 113 (Monday, June 13, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38115-38117]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13854]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-7048; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-014-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Models PC-12, PC-12/45, PC-12/47, and PC-12/47E
airplanes installed with an affected engine mounting frame assembly.
This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as longitudinal
material separation on the internal surface of the engine mounting
frame assembly tubes. We are issuing this proposed AD to require
actions to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 28, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Support PC-12, CH-6371 Stans,
Switzerland; phone: +41 41 619 33 33; fax: +41 41 619 73 11; email:
aircraft.com">SupportPC12@pilatus-aircraft.com; Internet: www.pilatus-aircraft.com.
You may review this referenced service information at the FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816)
329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
7048; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-7048;
Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-014-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD No. 2016-0081, dated April 25, 2016 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD.
Models PC-12, PC-12/45, PC-12/47, and PC-12/47E airplanes and was based
on mandatory continuing airworthiness information originated by an
aviation authority of another country. The MCAI states:
The PC-12 Engine Mounting Frame Assembly (hereafter referred to
as ``EMF'' in this AD), Part Number (P/N) 571.20.12.036, is a welded
structure including three special tubes, P/N 571.20.12.073, P/N
571.20.12.074 and P/N 571.20.12.107, the ends of which are subject
to a special swaging process during manufacturing. Longitudinal
material separation on the internal surface of the special tubes was
detected on few EMFs on new production aeroplanes. Investigations
identified the root cause to be an incorrect accomplishment of the
swaging process.
This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to
growth of the material separation and subsequent partial or complete
failure of the structural joint, possibly resulting in in-flight
detachment of the engine and consequent reduced control, or loss of
control, of the aeroplane.
To address this potential unsafe condition, Pilatus issued
Service Bulletin (SB) No. 71-009, now at Revision 2 (hereafter
referred to as ``the SB'' in this AD), to provide inspection
instructions for the affected EMF to detect indications of material
separation.
For the reason described above, this AD requires identification
and inspection of the
[[Page 38116]]
affected EMF and, depending on the findings, their replacement with
serviceable EMF.
You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-7048.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. has issued PILATUS PC-12 Service Bulletin No:
71-009, Reference No: 345, Modification No: EC-15-0632, Revision 2,
dated March 18, 2016; Pilatus Powerplant Mounting Frame, Removal/
Installation, Date module/Technical publication 12-A-71-00-05-00A-920A-
A, dated February 26, 2010, found in Pilatus Model type--PC-12, PC-12/
45, PC-12/47 MSN-101-888 Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), Document
No. 02049, 12-A-AM-00-00-00-I; and Pilatus Powerplant Mounting Frame,
Removal/Installation, Date module/Technical publication 12-B-71-00-05-
00A-920A-A, dated October 4, 2010, found in Pilatus Model type--PC-12/
47E MSN-1001-UP Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM), Document No. 02300,
12-B-AM-00-00-00-I. The service information describes procedures for
determining if an affected engine mounting frame assembly (EMF) is
installed, inspecting the EMF, and replacing the EMF with a serviceable
EMF. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section of this
NPRM.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because
we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 888 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 3 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $226,440, or $255 per product.
In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
cost the following amounts. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.
The visual and eddy current inspections would take about 3 work-
hours for a cost of $255 per product.
The replacement of the EMF would take about 90 work-hours and
require parts costing $33,336, for a cost of $40,986 per product.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD: Docket No. FAA-2016-7048; Directorate
Identifier 2016-CE-014-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 28, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD. Models PC-12, PC-12/45,
PC-12/47, and PC-12/47E airplanes, all serial numbers, that are:
(1) Installed with an affected serial number engine mounting
frame assembly (EMF), part number (P/N) 571.20.12.036, listed in
figure 1 of paragraph (c)(1) of this AD; and
Figure 1 to Paragraph (c)(1) of This AD--EMF P/N 571.20.12.036, Affected
Serial Numbers
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
0001 through 1200 inclusive.
1202 through 1272 inclusive.
1275 through 1323 inclusive.
1325 through 1328 inclusive.
1334 through 1338 inclusive.
1340 and 1342.
1344 through 1346 inclusive.
1348 and 1349.
1358, 1361, and 1365.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 71: Power Plant.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI
[[Page 38117]]
describes the unsafe condition as longitudinal material separation
on the internal surface of the engine mounting frame assembly tubes
(EMF). We are issuing this AD to detect and correct material
separation on the internal surface of the engine mounting frame
assembly tubes, which could lead to partial or complete failure of
the structural joint and possibly result in in-flight detachment of
the engine with consequent loss of control.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Do the actions in paragraphs (f)(1) through (7) of this AD. If
paragraphs (f)(1) through (6) of this AD have already been done
before the effective date of this AD, then only paragraph (f)(7) of
this AD applies.
(1) Within the compliance time identified in figure 2 of
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, do an ultrasonic inspection of the
swaged engine mounting tube ends of the affected EMF following the
instructions of paragraph 3.B.(1) of PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD PILATUS
PC-12 Service Bulletin No: 71-009, Reference No: 345, Modification
No: EC-15-0632, Revision 2, dated March 18, 2016.
Figure 2 to Paragraph (f)(1) of This AD--Initial Compliance Time
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A or B, whichever occurs later:
A Before the EMF exceeds 11,000 hours time-in-service (TIS) or 13,500
flight cycles (FC), whichever occurs first since first installation
of the EMF on an airplane.
B Within 1,000 hours TIS or 1,000 FC or 6 months, whichever occurs
first after the effective date of this AD.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) If an indication with an echo of less than 40 percent full
screen height is detected on an EMF during the ultrasonic inspection
required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, except for paragraph
(f)(7), no further actions are required for this AD. Document
compliance with this AD in the maintenance records.
(3) If an indication with an echo of 40 percent full screen
height or more is detected on an EMF during the ultrasonic
inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, do the actions
in paragraphs (f)(3)(i) through (iii) of this AD, as applicable.
(i) Before further flight and repetitively thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 600 hours TIS or 12 months, whichever occurs
first, do a visual inspection of the welding and do an eddy current
inspection of the tubes at the indication point detected during the
ultrasonic inspection. Use the instructions of paragraphs 3.B.(2)
and 3.B.(3) of PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD PILATUS PC-12 Service Bulletin
No: 71-009, Reference No: 345, Modification No: EC-15-0632, Revision
2, dated March 18, 2016.
(ii) If any cracks are found during any of the visual
inspections or if an indication with a signal of 20 percent or more
is detected during any of the eddy current inspections required in
paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this AD, before further flight, replace the
EMF with a serviceable EMF following the instructions in the service
information listed in paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, including all
subparagraphs as applicable.
(iii) Unless already done as required by paragraph (f)(3)(ii) of
this AD, within 1,800 hours TIS or 36 months after the initial
visual and eddy current inspections of the affected EMF required by
paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this AD, whichever occurs first, replace the
EMF with a serviceable EMF following the instructions in the service
information listed in paragraph (f)(5) of this AD, including all
subparagraphs as applicable.
(4) For the purpose of this AD, a serviceable EMF is defined as
any EMF that is not listed in figure 1 of paragraph (c)(1) of this
AD or an affected EMF that is listed in figure 1 of paragraph (c)(1)
of this AD but has had the ultrasonic inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD and had an indication with an echo of
less than 40 percent full screen height.
(5) For replacement of the EMF, follow the instructions listed
in paragraphs (f)(5)(i) and (ii), as applicable.
(i) For Models PC-12, PC-12/45, and PC-12/47, manufacturer
serial numbers (MSN) 101-888: Pilatus Powerplant Mounting Frame,
Removal/Installation, Date module/Technical publication 12-A-71-00-
05-00A-920A-A, dated February 26, 2010, found in Pilatus Model
type--PC-12, PC-12/45, PC-12/47 MSN-101-888 Aircraft Maintenance
Manual (AMM), Document No. 02049, 12-A-AM-00-00-00-I.
(ii) For Model PC-12/47E, MSN 1001 and up: Pilatus Powerplant
Mounting Frame, Removal/Installation, Date module/Technical
publication 12-B-71-00-05-00A-920A-A, dated October 4, 2010, found
in Pilatus Model type--PC-12/47E MSN-1001-UP Aircraft Maintenance
Manual (AMM), Document No. 02300, 12-B-AM-00-00-00-I.
(6) If an EMF has an indication with an echo of 40 percent or
more during the ultrasonic inspection required in paragraph (f)(1)
of this AD, you may replace the EMF with a serviceable EMF in lieu
of the visual or eddy current inspections required in paragraph
(f)(3)(i) of this AD. For replacement of the EMF, follow the
instructions in the service information listed in paragraph (f)(5)
of this AD, including all subparagraphs as applicable.
(7) As of the effective date of this AD, do not install an EMF
P/N 571.20.12.036 unless it has been determined to be a serviceable
EMF as specified in paragraph (f)(4) of this AD.
(8) Airplanes with an MSN of 1556 or higher are not affected by
this AD provided that the EMF has not been replaced since its
manufacture. A review of the maintenance records, Airworthiness
Approval Tag (FAA Form 8130-3), or other positive form of parts
identification such as a shipping ticket, invoice, or direct ship
authority letter, can be used to determine the serial number of the
EMF.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
doug.rudolph@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(h) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.
2016-0081, dated April 25, 2016, for related information pertaining
to this AD.
(2) You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2016-7048. For service information related to this AD, contact
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Support PC-12, CH-6371 Stans,
Switzerland; phone: +41 41 619 33 33; fax: +41 41 619 73 11; email:
aircraft.com">SupportPC12@pilatus-aircraft.com; Internet: www.pilatus-
aircraft.com.
(3) You may review this referenced service information at the
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri
64106. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on June 3, 2016.
Melvin Johnson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-13854 Filed 6-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P