Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; ALPROLIX, 36928-36929 [2016-13526]
Download as PDF
36928
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Notices
TABLE 3—ESTIMATED ANNUAL THIRD-PARTY DISCLOSURE BURDEN 1—Continued
Activity/21 CFR
section
Number of
disclosures
per
respondent
Number
of respondents
Notification of requirement to correct
major deficiencies—900.24(a) ..............
Notification of loss of approval; major deficiencies—900.24(a)(2) .......................
Notification of probationary status—
900.24(b)(1) ..........................................
Notification of loss of approval; minor deficiencies—900.24(b)(3) .......................
Total ..................................................
Total
annual
disclosures
Average
burden per
disclosure
Total
operating
and
maintenance
costs
(in dollars)
Total
hours 2
0.4
1
0.4
200
80
68
0.15
1
0.15
100
15
25.50
0.3
1
0.3
200
60
51
0.15
1
0.15
100
15
25.50
........................
........................
........................
........................
3,691,842
24,259,921
1 There
are no capital costs associated with this collection of information.
2 Total hours have been rounded.
3 Refers to the facility component of the burden for this requirement.
4 Refers to the AB component of the burden for this requirement.
5 Refers to the situation where a patient specifically does not want to receive the lay summary of her exam.
Dated: June 2, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
December 5, 2016. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for more information.
[FR Doc. 2016–13522 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am]
ADDRESSES:
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
as follows:
You may submit comments
Electronic Submissions
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA–2014–E–2351, FDA–
2014–E–2352, and FDA–2014–E–2350]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; ALPROLIX
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
ALPROLIX and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of
applications to the Director of the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO),
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of patents which claim that
human biological product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by August 8, 2016.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket Nos. FDA–
2014–E–2351, FDA–2014–E–2352, and
FDA–2014–E–2350 for ‘‘Determination
of Regulatory Review Period for
Purposes of Patent Extension;
ALPROLIX.’’
Received comments will be placed in
the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Notices
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993,
301–796–3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and
Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic
Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human
biological products, the testing phase
begins when the exemption to permit
the clinical investigations of the
biological becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the human biological product and
continues until FDA grants permission
to market the biological product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory
review period may count toward the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
actual amount of extension that the
Director of USPTO may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human biological product will include
all of the testing phase and approval
phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
human biologic product ALPROLIX
(Coagulation Factor IX (Recombinant),
Fc Fusion Protein). ALPROLIX is a
recombinant DNA derived, coagulation
Factor IX concentrate indicated in
adults and children with hemophilia B
for control and prevention of bleeding
episodes, perioperative management,
and routine prophylaxis to prevent or
reduce the frequency of bleeding
episodes. Subsequent to this approval,
the USPTO received patent term
restoration applications for ALPROLIX
(U.S. Patent Nos. 7,348,004, 7,862,820,
and 8,329,182) from Biogen Idec
Hemophilia Inc., and the USPTO
requested FDA’s assistance in
determining the patents’ eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
May 11, 2015, FDA advised the USPTO
that this human biological product had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of ALPROLIX
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review
Period
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
ALPROLIX is 2,223 days. Of this time,
1,767 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 456 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i))
became effective: February 27, 2008.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the date the investigational new
drug application (IND) became effective
was on February 27, 2008.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human biological product under section
351 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 262): December 28, 2012. FDA
has verified the applicant’s claim that
the biologics license application (BLA)
for ALPROLIX (BLA 125444/0) was
initially submitted on December 28,
2012.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36929
3. The date the application was
approved: March 28, 2014. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that BLA
125444/0 was approved on March 28,
2014.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its applications for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,326 days, 465
days, or 818, days, respectively, of
patent term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit either electronic or written
comments and ask for a redetermination
(see DATES). Furthermore, any interested
person may petition FDA for a
determination regarding whether the
applicant for extension acted with due
diligence during the regulatory review
period. To meet its burden, the petition
must be timely (see DATES) and contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1,
98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) to the
Division of Dockets Management (HFA–
305), Food and Drug Administration,
5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.
Dated: June 2, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–13526 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA–2014–E–2365, FDA–
2014–E–2368, FDA–2014–E–2367, and FDA–
2014–E–2366]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; ELOCTATE
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
ELOCTATE and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36928-36929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13526]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA-2014-E-2351, FDA-2014-E-2352, and FDA-2014-E-2350]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; ALPROLIX
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for ALPROLIX and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of applications to the Director of the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Department of Commerce, for the
extension of patents which claim that human biological product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published (see
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are incorrect may submit either
electronic or written comments and ask for a redetermination by August
8, 2016. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA for a
determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted with
due diligence during the regulatory review period by December 5, 2016.
See ``Petitions'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for more
information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket Nos.
FDA-2014-E-2351, FDA-2014-E-2352, and FDA-2014-E-2350 for
``Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; ALPROLIX.''
Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets
[[Page 36929]]
Management. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your comments and you must identify this
information as ``confidential.'' Any information marked as
``confidential'' will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR
10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about
FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September
18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide that a patent may
be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item
(human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food
additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA
before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's regulatory
review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human biological products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the biological becomes effective and runs until the
approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the human biological product and
continues until FDA grants permission to market the biological product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of USPTO may award
(for example, half the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's
determination of the length of a regulatory review period for a human
biological product will include all of the testing phase and approval
phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the human biologic product ALPROLIX
(Coagulation Factor IX (Recombinant), Fc Fusion Protein). ALPROLIX is a
recombinant DNA derived, coagulation Factor IX concentrate indicated in
adults and children with hemophilia B for control and prevention of
bleeding episodes, perioperative management, and routine prophylaxis to
prevent or reduce the frequency of bleeding episodes. Subsequent to
this approval, the USPTO received patent term restoration applications
for ALPROLIX (U.S. Patent Nos. 7,348,004, 7,862,820, and 8,329,182)
from Biogen Idec Hemophilia Inc., and the USPTO requested FDA's
assistance in determining the patents' eligibility for patent term
restoration. In a letter dated May 11, 2015, FDA advised the USPTO that
this human biological product had undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of ALPROLIX represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review Period
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
ALPROLIX is 2,223 days. Of this time, 1,767 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 456 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: February
27, 2008. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date the
investigational new drug application (IND) became effective was on
February 27, 2008.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human biological product under section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262): December 28, 2012. FDA has verified the
applicant's claim that the biologics license application (BLA) for
ALPROLIX (BLA 125444/0) was initially submitted on December 28, 2012.
3. The date the application was approved: March 28, 2014. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that BLA 125444/0 was approved on March
28, 2014.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the USPTO
applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual
period for patent extension. In its applications for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,326 days, 465 days, or 818, days, respectively,
of patent term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit either electronic or written comments and ask for
a redetermination (see DATES). Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period.
To meet its burden, the petition must be timely (see DATES) and contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part
1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the
format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Submit written petitions (two copies are
required) to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Dated: June 2, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-13526 Filed 6-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P