Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Indian Creek, Miami Beach, FL, 36798-36800 [2016-13458]
Download as PDF
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
36798
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
property held by the REIT at the end of
the taxable year in which the related
section 355 distribution occurs shall be
increased by an amount equal to the
amount of gain so recognized, increased
by the amount of the REIT’s recognized
built-in loss for such taxable year, and
reduced by the amount of the REIT’s
recognized built-in gain and recognized
built-in gain carryover for such taxable
year.
(B) Allocation of basis increase. The
aggregate increase in basis by reason of
paragraph (b)(4)(ii)(A) of this section
shall be allocated among the converted
property in proportion to their
respective built-in gains on the date of
the conversion transaction.
(5) [Reserved]. For further guidance,
see § 1.337(d)–7(b)(5).
(c) Election of deemed sale
treatment—(1) In general. Section
1.337(d)–7(b) and paragraph (b) of this
section do not apply if the C corporation
that qualifies as a RIC or a REIT or
transfers property to a RIC or a REIT
makes the election described in
§ 1.337(d)–7(c)(5) or is treated as making
such election under paragraph (c)(6) of
this section. A C corporation that makes,
or is treated as making, such an election
recognizes gain and loss as if it sold the
converted property to an unrelated party
at fair market value on the deemed sale
date (as defined in § 1.337(d)–7(c)(3)).
See § 1.337(d)–7(c)(4) concerning
limitations on the use of loss in
computing gain. Section 1.337(d)–7(c)
and this paragraph (c) do not apply if
their application would result in the
recognition of a net loss. For this
purpose, net loss is the excess of
aggregate losses over aggregate gains
(including items of income), without
regard to character.
(2) through (5) [Reserved]. For further
guidance, see § 1.337(d)–7(c)(2) through
(5).
(6) Conversion transaction following a
section 355 distribution. A C
corporation described in paragraph (f)(1)
of this section is treated as having made
the election under § 1.337(d)–7(c)(5)
with respect to a conversion transaction
if the conversion transaction occurs
following the related section 355
distribution (as defined in paragraph
(f)(1)(i) of this section) and the C
corporation has not made such election.
(7) through (e) [Reserved]. For further
guidance, see § 1.337(d)–7(c)(7) through
(e).
(f) Conversion transaction preceding
or following a section 355 distribution—
(1) In general. A C corporation or a REIT
is described in this paragraph (f)(1) if—
(i) The C corporation or the REIT
engages in a conversion transaction
involving a REIT during the twenty-year
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
period beginning on the date that is ten
years before the date of a section 355
distribution (the related section 355
distribution); and
(ii) The C corporation or the REIT
engaging in the related section 355
distribution is either—
(A) The distributing corporation or
the controlled corporation, as those
terms are defined in section 355(a)(1); or
(B) A member of the separate
affiliated group (as defined in section
355(b)(3)(B)) of the distributing
corporation or the controlled
corporation.
(2) Predecessors and successors. For
purposes of this paragraph (f), any
reference to a controlled corporation or
a distributing corporation includes a
reference to any predecessor or
successor of such corporation.
Predecessors and successors include
corporations which succeed to and take
into account items described in section
381(c) of the distributing corporation or
the controlled corporation, and
corporations having such items to
which the distributing corporation or
the controlled corporation succeeded
and took into account.
(3) Exclusion of certain conversion
transactions. A C corporation or a REIT
is not described in paragraph (f)(1) of
this section if—
(i) The distributing corporation and
the controlled corporation are both
REITs immediately after the related
section 355 distribution (including by
reason of elections under section
856(c)(1) made after the related section
355 distribution that are effective before
the related section 355 distribution) and
at all times during the two years
thereafter;
(ii) Section 355(h)(1) does not apply
to the related section 355 distribution by
reason of section 355(h)(2)(B); or
(iii) The related section 355
distribution is described in a ruling
request referred to in section 311(c) of
Division Q of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2016, Public Law
114–113, 129 Stat. 2422.
(g) Effective/Applicability date. (1)
[Reserved]. For further guidance, see
§ 1.337(d)–7(g)(1).
(2) Special rules. (i) [Reserved]. For
further guidance, see § 1.337(d)–
7(g)(2)(i).
(ii) Conversion transactions occurring
on or after June 7, 2016. Paragraphs
(a)(1), (a)(2)(vi) and (vii), (b)(4), (c)(1),
(c)(6), and (f) of this section apply to
conversion transactions occurring on or
after June 7, 2016 and to conversion
transactions and related section 355
distributions for which the conversion
transaction occurs before, and the
related section 355 distribution occurs
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
on or after, June 7, 2016. For conversion
transactions that occurred on or after
January 2, 2002 and before June 7, 2016,
see § 1.337(d)–7 as contained in 26 CFR
part 1 in effect on April 1, 2016.
(iii) Recognition period. Paragraphs
(b)(1)(ii), (b)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iii) of this
section applies to conversion
transactions that occur on or after
August 8, 2016. For conversion
transactions that occurred on or after
January 2, 2002 and before August 8,
2016, see § 1.337(d)–7 as contained in
26 CFR part 1 in effect on April 1, 2016.
(h) Expiration date. The applicability
of this section expires on June 7, 2019.
John Dalrymple,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: May 11, 2016.
Mark J. Mazur,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2016–13443 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2015–0940]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Indian Creek, Miami Beach, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is changing
the operating schedule that governs the
63rd Street Bridge across Indian Creek,
mile 4.0, at Miami Beach, FL. This rule
implements restrictions that allow the
bridge to remain closed during peak
vehicle traffic times. Bridge openings
during peak vehicle traffic times cause
major traffic jams that may be avoided
without negatively impacting vessel
traffic on the Indian Creek. Modifying
the bridge operating schedule will
reduce major vehicle traffic issues
during rush hour times.
DATES: This rule is effective July 8,
2016.
SUMMARY:
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2015–
0940. In the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Mr. Rod Elkins with the Coast
Guard; telephone 305–415–6989, email
Rodney.J.Elkins@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On February, 18, 2016, we published
a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation
Regulation; Indian Creek, Miami Beach,
FL in the Federal Register (81 FR 8168).
We received 508 comments on this rule.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
The 63rd Street Bridge across Indian
Creek, mile 4.0, at Miami Beach, Florida
is a single leaf bascule bridge. It has a
vertical clearance of 11 feet at mean
high water in the closed position and a
horizontal clearance of 50 feet.
Presently, in accordance with 33 CFR
117.5, the 63rd Street Bridge is required
to open on signal for the passage of
vessels. Traffic on the waterway
includes both commercial and
recreational vessels.
The City of Miami Beach and Miami
Dade County determined through bridge
studies, traffic logs, and public meetings
that restricting bridge openings during
peak traffic hours will significantly
reduce vehicular traffic congestion.
Based on this determination, the City of
Miami Beach requested this action to
alleviate additional traffic congestion
created by bridge openings during peak
hours.
In addition to changing the schedule
to allow for limited openings during the
regular work week, the Coast Guard is
making a regulatory change that will
apply during the annual boat show.
Every year in mid-February the City of
Miami Beach hosts the Yacht and
Brokerage Show which creates
unusually high vehicle and vessel traffic
during the weeks before and after the
show. The Coast Guard typically issues
temporary deviations to the 63rd Street
Bridge operations that help balance
vessel and vehicle needs during those
times. The Coast Guard is adopting the
annual temporary deviation as part of
this bridge regulation. The bridge
owner, Florida Department of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
Transportation concurs with this Final
Rule change.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
There were 508 comments received
concerning the proposed rule. Of these
comments, 497 were in favor of the
proposed rule. Eight comments
recommended various additional
closure times that place more
restrictions on bridge openings and do
meet the reasonable needs of navigation.
Two comments recommended openings
on the hour and half hour at all times
of day. The Coast Guard did not adopt
these proposals because they are less
restrictive than necessary to balance the
needs of vehicle traffic during peak
travel hours of the day and more
restrictive than necessary to
accommodate the reasonable needs of
maritime navigation outside times of
increased vehicle traffic. One comment
recommended placing a toll system for
openings on the bridge. This rulemaking
seeks to set an operating schedule that
will balance the needs of vehicle traffic
with the reasonable needs of navigation.
Therefore, the Coast Guard did not
accept this proposal because it is
outside the scope of this rulemaking.
The Coast Guard is adding § 117.293
as proposed without change.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to
rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these
statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protesters.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,
it has not been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the ability that vessels can
still transit the waterway during
scheduled openings. Additionally,
vessels that are capable of transiting
under the bridge in the closed position,
may do so at any time.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36799
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received zero
comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels that require more than eleven
feet vertical clearance that need to
transit the bridge during daytime
closure periods. Vessels will still be
allowed to transit this waterway at all
times if they can clear without an
opening, or at the specified times if they
need the bridge open. This change in
operating schedule will still meet the
reasonable needs of navigation while
taking into account other modes of
transportation.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge
may be small entities, for the reasons
stated in section V.A above, this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
36800
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a determination that this
action is one of a category of actions
which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. This action is categorically
excluded from further review, under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
G. Protest Activities
Safety Zone; Cincinnati Reds Season
Fireworks
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 117.293 to read as follows:
§ 117.293
Indian Creek.
The draw of the 63rd Street Bridge,
Indian Creek mile 4.0, at Miami Beach,
shall open on signal except as follows:
(a) From 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday
through Friday except Federal holidays,
the draw need open only on the hour
and half-hour.
(b) From 7:10 a.m. to 9:55 a.m. and
4:05 p.m. to 6:59 p.m., Monday through
Friday except Federal holidays, the
draw need not open for the passage of
vessels.
(c) In February of each year during the
period seven days prior to the City of
Miami Beach Yacht and Brokerage
Show and the four days following the
show, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., the bridge
need not open except for 10 minutes at
the top of the hour. At all other times
the bridge shall operate on its normal
schedule.
Dated: June 2, 2016.
S.A. Buschman,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2016–13458 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0145]
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a safety zone for the Cincinnati Reds
Season Fireworks on the Ohio River,
from mile marker 470.1 and ending at
470.4, extending 500 feet from the State
of Ohio shoreline. This rule is effective
during specific home games during the
Major League Baseball season. Should
the Cincinnati Reds make the playoffs
and have additional home games; the
Coast Guard will provide notification of
enforcement periods via Broadcast
Notices to Mariners, Local Notices to
Mariners, and/or Marine Safety
Information Bulletins as appropriate.
This action is needed to protect vessels
transiting the area and event spectators
from the hazards associated with the
Cincinnati Reds Barge-based fireworks.
During the enforcement period, entry
into or transiting in the safety zone is
prohibited to all vessels not registered
with the sponsor as participants or
official patrol vessels.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.801, Table No. 1, Line no. 2 will be
enforced from 9:00 p.m. through 11:30
p.m. on April 6, April 8, April 22, May
6, May 20, June 3, June 10, June 24, July
15, July 22, July 31, August 19,
September 2, September 16, and
September 30, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice of
enforcement, call or email Caloeb
Gandy, Sector Ohio Valley, U.S. Coast
Guard at telephone 502–779–5334,
email caloeb.l.gandy@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the safety zone for
the Cincinnati Reds Season Fireworks
listed in 33 CFR 165.801, Table no. 1,
Line no. 2. These regulations can be
found in the Code of Federal
Regulations, under 33 CFR 165.801 or in
the Federal Register (77 FR 12460). As
specified in § 165.801, during the
enforcement period no vessel may
transit this safety zone without approval
from the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley
(COTP). If permission is granted, all
persons and vessels shall comply with
the instructions of the COTP or
designated representative.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36798-36800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13458]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2015-0940]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Indian Creek, Miami Beach, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the operating schedule that
governs the 63rd Street Bridge across Indian Creek, mile 4.0, at Miami
Beach, FL. This rule implements restrictions that allow the bridge to
remain closed during peak vehicle traffic times. Bridge openings during
peak vehicle traffic times cause major traffic jams that may be avoided
without negatively impacting vessel traffic on the Indian Creek.
Modifying the bridge operating schedule will reduce major vehicle
traffic issues during rush hour times.
DATES: This rule is effective July 8, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2015-0940. In the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking.
[[Page 36799]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Rod Elkins with the Coast Guard; telephone 305-415-
6989, email Rodney.J.Elkins@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On February, 18, 2016, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Indian Creek, Miami
Beach, FL in the Federal Register (81 FR 8168). We received 508
comments on this rule.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
The 63rd Street Bridge across Indian Creek, mile 4.0, at Miami
Beach, Florida is a single leaf bascule bridge. It has a vertical
clearance of 11 feet at mean high water in the closed position and a
horizontal clearance of 50 feet. Presently, in accordance with 33 CFR
117.5, the 63rd Street Bridge is required to open on signal for the
passage of vessels. Traffic on the waterway includes both commercial
and recreational vessels.
The City of Miami Beach and Miami Dade County determined through
bridge studies, traffic logs, and public meetings that restricting
bridge openings during peak traffic hours will significantly reduce
vehicular traffic congestion. Based on this determination, the City of
Miami Beach requested this action to alleviate additional traffic
congestion created by bridge openings during peak hours.
In addition to changing the schedule to allow for limited openings
during the regular work week, the Coast Guard is making a regulatory
change that will apply during the annual boat show. Every year in mid-
February the City of Miami Beach hosts the Yacht and Brokerage Show
which creates unusually high vehicle and vessel traffic during the
weeks before and after the show. The Coast Guard typically issues
temporary deviations to the 63rd Street Bridge operations that help
balance vessel and vehicle needs during those times. The Coast Guard is
adopting the annual temporary deviation as part of this bridge
regulation. The bridge owner, Florida Department of Transportation
concurs with this Final Rule change.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
There were 508 comments received concerning the proposed rule. Of
these comments, 497 were in favor of the proposed rule. Eight comments
recommended various additional closure times that place more
restrictions on bridge openings and do meet the reasonable needs of
navigation. Two comments recommended openings on the hour and half hour
at all times of day. The Coast Guard did not adopt these proposals
because they are less restrictive than necessary to balance the needs
of vehicle traffic during peak travel hours of the day and more
restrictive than necessary to accommodate the reasonable needs of
maritime navigation outside times of increased vehicle traffic. One
comment recommended placing a toll system for openings on the bridge.
This rulemaking seeks to set an operating schedule that will balance
the needs of vehicle traffic with the reasonable needs of navigation.
Therefore, the Coast Guard did not accept this proposal because it is
outside the scope of this rulemaking.
The Coast Guard is adding Sec. 117.293 as proposed without change.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protesters.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
vessels can still transit the waterway during scheduled openings.
Additionally, vessels that are capable of transiting under the bridge
in the closed position, may do so at any time.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received zero comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following entities, some of which might be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels that require more
than eleven feet vertical clearance that need to transit the bridge
during daytime closure periods. Vessels will still be allowed to
transit this waterway at all times if they can clear without an
opening, or at the specified times if they need the bridge open. This
change in operating schedule will still meet the reasonable needs of
navigation while taking into account other modes of transportation.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A
above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain
[[Page 36800]]
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
determination that this action is one of a category of actions which do
not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule simply promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. This action is categorically excluded from
further review, under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the
Instruction.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 117.293 to read as follows:
Sec. 117.293 Indian Creek.
The draw of the 63rd Street Bridge, Indian Creek mile 4.0, at Miami
Beach, shall open on signal except as follows:
(a) From 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Friday except Federal
holidays, the draw need open only on the hour and half-hour.
(b) From 7:10 a.m. to 9:55 a.m. and 4:05 p.m. to 6:59 p.m., Monday
through Friday except Federal holidays, the draw need not open for the
passage of vessels.
(c) In February of each year during the period seven days prior to
the City of Miami Beach Yacht and Brokerage Show and the four days
following the show, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., the bridge need not open
except for 10 minutes at the top of the hour. At all other times the
bridge shall operate on its normal schedule.
Dated: June 2, 2016.
S.A. Buschman,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2016-13458 Filed 6-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P