Civil Monetary Penalties Inflationary Adjustment, 36791-36793 [2016-13455]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
36791
21 CFR
section
File No.
Sponsor
Product name
041–955 1 ............
Cross Vetpharm Group Ltd., Broomhill Rd., Tallaght,
Dublin 24, Ireland.
Cross Vetpharm Group Ltd., Broomhill Rd., Tallaght,
Dublin 24, Ireland.
Cross Vetpharm Group Ltd., Broomhill Rd., Tallaght,
Dublin 24, Ireland.
Vetoquinol N.-A., Inc., 2000 chemin Georges,
Lavaltrie (PQ), Canada J5T 3S5.
Erythromycin Medicated Premix ...................................
558.248
PURINA Sulfa (sulfamethazine) 12.5% Solution .........
522.2260a
Supersweet Medipak TYLAN 10 ..................................
558.625
Penicillin G Potassium, USP, Soluble Powder ............
520.1696b
049–729 1 ............
100–128 1 ............
200–307 1 ............
1These NADAs were identified as being affected by guidance for industry #213, ‘‘New Animal Drugs and New Animal Drug Combination Products Administered in or on Medicated Feed or Drinking Water of Food-Producing Animals: Recommendations for Drug Sponsors for Voluntarily
Aligning Product Use Conditions with GFI #209,’’ December 2013.
Therefore, under authority delegated
to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs
and redelegated to the Center for
Veterinary Medicine, and in accordance
with § 514.116 Notice of withdrawal of
approval of application (21 CFR
514.116), notice is given that approval
of NADAs 007–076, 008–244, 041–955,
049–729, 100–128, and ANADA 200–
307, and all supplements and
amendments thereto, is hereby
withdrawn, effective June 20, 2016.
Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, FDA is amending the animal
drug regulations to reflect the voluntary
withdrawal of approval of these
applications.
Dated: May 31, 2016.
Tracey Forfa,
Acting Director, Center for Veterinary
Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2016–13518 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 35, 103, 127, and 138
[Public Notice: 9536]
RIN 1400–AD94
Civil Monetary Penalties Inflationary
Adjustment
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule is issued to
adjust the civil monetary penalties
(CMP) for regulatory provisions
maintained and enforced by the
Department of State. The Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of
1990 (the 1990 Act), as amended by the
Debt Collection Improvement Act of
1996 (the 1996 Act), required the head
of each agency to adjust its CMPs for
inflation no later than October 23, 1996
and required agencies to make
adjustments at least once every four
years thereafter. The Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015 (the 2015
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
Act) further amended the 1990 Act by
requiring agencies to adjust CMPs, if
necessary, pursuant to a ‘‘catch-up’’
adjustment methodology prescribed by
the 2015 Act, which mandates that the
catch up adjustment take effect no later
than August 1, 2016. Additionally, the
2015 Act requires agencies to make
annual adjustments to their respective
CMPs in accordance with guidance
issued by the Office of Management and
Budget. The revised CMP adjustments
in this rule will apply only to those
penalties assessed after its effective
date; subsequent annual adjustments are
to be published not later than January
15 of each year. In keeping with
guidance provided by the Office of
Management and Budget, the new
penalty levels will apply to all
assessments made on or after August 1,
2016, regardless of the date on which
the underlying facts or violations
occurred.
DATES: This final rule is effective August
1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alice Kottmyer, Attorney-Adviser,
Office of Management, kottmyeram@
state.gov. ATTN: Regulatory Change,
CMP Adjustments, (202) 647–2318.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 1990
Act (Pub. L. 101–410) provided for the
regular evaluation of CMPs by federal
agencies. Periodic inflationary
adjustments of CMPs ensure that the
consequences of statutory violations
adequately reflect the gravity of such
offenses and that CMPs are properly
accounted for and collected by the
federal government. In April 1996, the
1990 Act was amended by the 1996 Act
(Pub. L. 104–134), which required
federal agencies to adjust their CMPs at
least once every four years. However,
because inflationary adjustments to
CMPs were statutorily capped at ten
percent of the maximum penalty
amount, but only required to be
calculated every four years, CMPs in
many cases did not correspond with the
true measure of inflation over the
preceding four year period, leading to a
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
decline in the real value of the penalty.
To remedy this decline, the 2015 Act
(section 701 of Pub. L. 114–74) requires
agencies to adjust the level of CMPs
with an initial ‘‘catch-up’’ adjustment
through a rulemaking and to make
subsequent annual inflationary
adjustments to their respective CMPs
using a methodology mandated by the
legislation.
The 1990 Act defines civil monetary
penalty as any penalty, fine, or other
sanction that:
• Is for a specific monetary amount as
provided for in federal law; or has a
maximum amount provided for by
federal law; and
• is assessed or enforced by an agency
as pursuant to federal law; and,
• is assessed or enforced pursuant to
an administrative proceeding or a civil
action in the federal courts.
Within the Department of State (Title
22, Code of Federal Regulations), this
rule affects four areas:
(1) Part 35, which implements the
Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of
1986 (PFCRA), codified at 31 U.S.C.
3801–3812;
(2) Part 103, which implements the
Chemical Weapons Convention
Implementation Act of 1998 (CWC Act);
(3) Part 127, which implements the
penalty provisions of sections 38(e),
39A(c), and 40(k) of the Arms Export
Control Act (AECA) (22 U.S.C. 2778(e),
2779a(c), 2780(k)); and
(4) Part 138, which implements
Section 319 of Public Law 101–221,
codified at 31 U.S.C. 1352, and prohibits
recipients of federal contracts, grants,
and loans from using appropriated
funds for lobbying the Executive or
Legislative Branches of the federal
government in connection with a
specific contract.
The 2015 Act instructs agencies to
make a one-time catch-up adjustment to
CMPs using the maximum penalty level
or range of minimum and maximum
penalties as they were ‘‘most recently
established or adjusted under a
provision of law other than [the 1990]
Act.’’ Nevertheless, the 2015 Act
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
36792
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
specifies that the catch-up adjustment
amount will in no case exceed 150% of
the penalty amount which was in force
at the enactment date of the 2015 Act on
November 2, 2015; therefore, the total
revised penalty amount will not exceed
250% of the total maximum penalty
amount on November 2, 2015.
Specific Changes to 22 CFR Made by
This Rule
I. Part 35
The PFRCA, enacted in 1986,
authorizes agencies, with approval from
the Department of Justice, to pursue
individuals or firms for false claims.
The maximum liability under the
PFRCA is $5,000 for each false claim, up
to a maximum of $150,000, in addition
to twice the amount of the claim
submitted contrary to the PFRCA.
According to OMB guidance, the
multiplier for the PFRCA (a 1986
statute) is 2.15628; therefore, the new
maximum penalty for each false claim
or statement is $10,781, up to a
maximum of $323,442.
II. Part 103
The CWC Act provided domestic
implementation of the Convention on
the Prohibition of the Development,
Production, Stockpiling, and Use of
Chemical Weapons and on Their
Destruction. The penalty provisions of
the CWC Act are codified at 22 U.S.C.
6761. A person violating 22 U.S.C.
6761(a)(1)(A), Prohibited acts relating to
inspections, is subject to a civil penalty
of an amount not to exceed $25,000 for
each such violation. A person violating
22 U.S.C. 6761(a)(1)(B), Recordkeeping
violations, is subject to a civil penalty in
an amount not to exceed $5,000 for each
such violation.
According to OMB Guidance, the
multiplier for the CWC Act (a 1998
statute) is 1.45023. Therefore, the new
maximum civil monetary penalty for
prohibited acts relating to inspections is
$36,256 for each violation; and the new
maximum civil monetary penalty for
recordkeeping violations is $7,251 for
each such violation.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Part 127
The Assistant Secretary of State for
Political-Military Affairs is responsible
for the imposition of CMPs under the
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR), which is
administered by the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls (DDTC). Each of
the penalty provisions of the AECA
provides that the CMP for each relevant
violation may not exceed $500,000.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
(1) AECA Section 38(e)
The most recent statutory
modification of the CMPs provided for
under AECA section 38(e), 22 U.S.C.
2778(e), occurred in 1985 when the
maximum penalty amount was capped
at $500,000 per violation. According to
OMB guidance, the multiplier for AECA
section 38(e) is 2.18802; therefore, the
new maximum penalty will be
$1,094,010 per violation.
(2) AECA Section 39A(c)
The most recent statutory
modification of the CMPs provided for
under AECA section 39A(c), 22 U.S.C.
2779a(c), occurred in 1994 when the
maximum penalty amount was capped
at $500,000 per violation. According to
OMB guidance, the multiplier for AECA
section 39A(c) is 1.59089; therefore, the
new maximum adjusted penalty level
will be $795,445 per violation.
(3) AECA Section 40(k)
The most recent statutory
modification of the CMPs provided for
under AECA section 40(k), 22 U.S.C.
2780(k), occurred in 1989 when the
maximum penalty amount was capped
at $500,000 per violation. According to
OMB guidance, the multiplier for AECA
section 40(k) is 1.89361; therefore, the
new maximum adjusted penalty level
will be $946,805 per violation.
IV. Part 138
Section 319 of Public Law 101–121,
codified at 31 U.S.C. 1352, provides
penalties for recipients of federal
contracts, grants, and loans who use
appropriated funds to lobby the
Executive or Legislative Branches of the
federal government in connection with
a specific contract, grant, or loan. Any
person who violates that prohibition is
subject to a civil penalty of not less than
$10,000 and not more than $100,000 for
each such expenditure. The statute also
requires each person who requests or
receives a federal contract, grant,
cooperative agreement, loan, or a federal
commitment to insure or guarantee a
loan, to disclose any lobbying; the
penalty for failure to disclose is not less
than $10,000 and not more than
$100,000 for each such failure.
According to OMB guidance, the
multiplier for 31 U.S.C. 1352 (a 1989
statute) is 1.89361. Therefore, the new
maximum civil violations under the
statute, for both improper expenditures
and failure to disclose, are: Not less than
$18,936 and not more than $189,361.
Effective Date of Penalties
The revised CMP amounts will go into
effect on August 1, 2016. All violations
for which CMPs are assessed after the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
effective date of this rule, regardless of
whether the violation occurred before
the effective date, will be assessed at the
adjusted penalty level.
Future Adjustments and Reporting
The 2015 Act directs agencies to
undertake an annual review of CMPs
using a formula prescribed by the
statute. Hereafter, annual adjustments to
CMPs will be made in accordance with
the guidance issued by OMB. The
Department of State will publish
notification of annual inflation
adjustments to CMPs in the Federal
Register no later than January 15 of each
year, with the adjusted amount taking
effect immediately upon publication.
Furthermore, OMB Circular A–136,
Financial Reporting Requirements,
directs agencies to identify any changes
to CMPs in the Agency Financial Report
(AFR), including the affected penalties,
dates and amounts of adjustments, and
applicable statutes and regulations.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is publishing
this rule using the ‘‘good cause’’
exception to the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), as the
Department has determined that public
comment on this rulemaking would be
impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest. This rulemaking is
mandatory; it implements Public Law
114–74.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because this rulemaking is exempt
from Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedures Act, a Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis is not required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule does not involve a mandate
that will result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any year and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under
the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996
This rule has been found not to be a
major rule within the meaning of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking does not have
sufficient federalism implications to
require consultations or warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 110 / Wednesday, June 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
impact statement. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental
consultation on federal programs and
activities do not apply to this
rulemaking.
PART 35—PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL
REMEDIES
1. The authority citation for part 35 is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 31 U.S.C. 3801
et seq.; Pub. L. 114–74, 129 Stat. 584.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Department believes that benefits
of the rulemaking outweigh any costs,
and there are no feasible alternatives to
this rulemaking. It is the Department’s
position that this rulemaking is not an
economically significant rule under the
criteria of Executive Order 12866, and is
consistent with the provisions of
Executive Order 13563.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
the proposed amendment in light of
Executive Order 12988 to eliminate
ambiguity, minimize litigation, establish
clear legal standards, and reduce
burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not preempt tribal law.
Accordingly, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
2. In § 35.3:
a. Remove ‘‘$5,000’’ and add in its
place ‘‘$10,781’’, wherever it occurs.
■ b. Add paragraph (f) to read as
follows:
■
■
§ 35.3 Basis for civil penalties and
assessments.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) The maximum penalty for each
false claim or statement is $10,781, up
to a maximum of $323,442.
PART 103—REGULATIONS FOR
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHEMICAL
WEAPONS CONVENTION AND THE
CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION
IMPLEMENTATION ACT OF 1998 ON
THE TAKING OF SAMPLES AND ON
ENFORCEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS
CONCERNING RECORDKEEPING AND
INSPECTIONS
3. The authority citation for part 103
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 6701
et seq.; Pub. L. 114–74, 129 Stat. 584.
§ 103.6
List of Subjects
4. Amend § 103.6 to remove
‘‘$25,000’’ and add in its place
‘‘$36,256’’ in paragraph (a)(1), and to
remove ‘‘$5,000’’, and add in its place
$7,251’’ in paragraph (a)(2).
22 CFR Part 35
PART 127—VIOLATIONS AND
PENALTIES
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Fraud, Penalties.
■
22 CFR Part 103
Authority: Sections 2, 38, and 42, Pub. L.
90–629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2791); 22 U.S.C. 401; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22
U.S.C. 2779a; 22 U.S.C. 2780; E.O. 13637, 78
FR 16129; Pub. L. 114–74, 129 Stat. 584.
5. The authority citation for part 127
is revised to read as follows:
Administrative practice and
procedure, Chemicals, Classified
information, Foreign relations, Freedom
of information, International
organization, Investigations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
22 CFR Part 127
Arms and munitions, Exports.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
22 CFR Part 138
Government contracts, Grant
programs, Loan programs, Lobbying,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth above, 22
CFR parts 127, 35, 103, and 138 are
amended as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 Jun 07, 2016
Jkt 238001
6. Section 127.10 is amended by
revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
■
§ 127.10
Civil penalty.
(a)(1) The Assistant Secretary of State
for Political-Military Affairs is
authorized to impose a civil penalty, as
follows:
(i) For each violation of 22 U.S.C.
2778, an amount not to exceed
$1,094,010;
(ii) For each violation of 22 U.S.C.
2779a, an amount not to exceed
$795,445; and
(iii) For each violation of 22 U.S.C.
2780, an amount not to exceed
$946,805.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
(2) The civil penalty may be either in
addition to, or in lieu of, any other
liability or penalty which may be
imposed.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 138—NEW RESTRICTIONS ON
LOBBYING
7. The authority citation for part 138
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 31 U.S.C.
1352; Pub. L. 114–74, 129 Stat. 584.
§ 138.400
[Amended]
8. Amend § 138.400 by removing
‘‘$10,000’’ and ‘‘$100,000’’, and adding
in their place ‘‘$18,936’’ and ‘‘$189,361’’
respectively, wherever they occur.
■
Dated: June 1, 2016.
Lisa Aguirre,
Managing Director, Directorate of Defense
Trade Controls Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2016–13455 Filed 6–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9770]
RIN 1545–BN39
[Amended]
■
This rulemaking does not impose or
revise any information collections
subject to 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
36793
Sfmt 4700
Certain Transfers of Property to
Regulated Investment Companies
[RICs] and Real Estate Investment
Trusts [REITs]; Final and Temporary
Regulations
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final and temporary
regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
and temporary regulations effecting the
repeal of the General Utilities doctrine
by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and
preventing abuse of the Protecting
Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015.
The temporary regulations impose
corporate level tax on certain
transactions in which property of a C
corporation becomes the property of a
REIT. The temporary regulations affect
RICs, REITs, C corporations the property
of which becomes the property of a RIC
or a REIT, and their shareholders. The
text of these temporary regulations also
serves as the text of part of the proposed
regulations in the related notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–126452–15)
set forth in the Proposed Rules section
in this issue of the Federal Register.
DATES: These regulations are effective
June 7, 2016.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\08JNR1.SGM
08JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 110 (Wednesday, June 8, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36791-36793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13455]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 35, 103, 127, and 138
[Public Notice: 9536]
RIN 1400-AD94
Civil Monetary Penalties Inflationary Adjustment
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule is issued to adjust the civil monetary
penalties (CMP) for regulatory provisions maintained and enforced by
the Department of State. The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990 (the 1990 Act), as amended by the Debt
Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (the 1996 Act), required the head of
each agency to adjust its CMPs for inflation no later than October 23,
1996 and required agencies to make adjustments at least once every four
years thereafter. The Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act of 2015 (the 2015 Act) further amended the 1990 Act by
requiring agencies to adjust CMPs, if necessary, pursuant to a ``catch-
up'' adjustment methodology prescribed by the 2015 Act, which mandates
that the catch up adjustment take effect no later than August 1, 2016.
Additionally, the 2015 Act requires agencies to make annual adjustments
to their respective CMPs in accordance with guidance issued by the
Office of Management and Budget. The revised CMP adjustments in this
rule will apply only to those penalties assessed after its effective
date; subsequent annual adjustments are to be published not later than
January 15 of each year. In keeping with guidance provided by the
Office of Management and Budget, the new penalty levels will apply to
all assessments made on or after August 1, 2016, regardless of the date
on which the underlying facts or violations occurred.
DATES: This final rule is effective August 1, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alice Kottmyer, Attorney-Adviser,
Office of Management, kottmyeram@state.gov. ATTN: Regulatory Change,
CMP Adjustments, (202) 647-2318.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 1990 Act (Pub. L. 101-410) provided for
the regular evaluation of CMPs by federal agencies. Periodic
inflationary adjustments of CMPs ensure that the consequences of
statutory violations adequately reflect the gravity of such offenses
and that CMPs are properly accounted for and collected by the federal
government. In April 1996, the 1990 Act was amended by the 1996 Act
(Pub. L. 104-134), which required federal agencies to adjust their CMPs
at least once every four years. However, because inflationary
adjustments to CMPs were statutorily capped at ten percent of the
maximum penalty amount, but only required to be calculated every four
years, CMPs in many cases did not correspond with the true measure of
inflation over the preceding four year period, leading to a decline in
the real value of the penalty. To remedy this decline, the 2015 Act
(section 701 of Pub. L. 114-74) requires agencies to adjust the level
of CMPs with an initial ``catch-up'' adjustment through a rulemaking
and to make subsequent annual inflationary adjustments to their
respective CMPs using a methodology mandated by the legislation.
The 1990 Act defines civil monetary penalty as any penalty, fine,
or other sanction that:
Is for a specific monetary amount as provided for in
federal law; or has a maximum amount provided for by federal law; and
is assessed or enforced by an agency as pursuant to
federal law; and,
is assessed or enforced pursuant to an administrative
proceeding or a civil action in the federal courts.
Within the Department of State (Title 22, Code of Federal
Regulations), this rule affects four areas:
(1) Part 35, which implements the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act
of 1986 (PFCRA), codified at 31 U.S.C. 3801-3812;
(2) Part 103, which implements the Chemical Weapons Convention
Implementation Act of 1998 (CWC Act);
(3) Part 127, which implements the penalty provisions of sections
38(e), 39A(c), and 40(k) of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) (22
U.S.C. 2778(e), 2779a(c), 2780(k)); and
(4) Part 138, which implements Section 319 of Public Law 101-221,
codified at 31 U.S.C. 1352, and prohibits recipients of federal
contracts, grants, and loans from using appropriated funds for lobbying
the Executive or Legislative Branches of the federal government in
connection with a specific contract.
The 2015 Act instructs agencies to make a one-time catch-up
adjustment to CMPs using the maximum penalty level or range of minimum
and maximum penalties as they were ``most recently established or
adjusted under a provision of law other than [the 1990] Act.''
Nevertheless, the 2015 Act
[[Page 36792]]
specifies that the catch-up adjustment amount will in no case exceed
150% of the penalty amount which was in force at the enactment date of
the 2015 Act on November 2, 2015; therefore, the total revised penalty
amount will not exceed 250% of the total maximum penalty amount on
November 2, 2015.
Specific Changes to 22 CFR Made by This Rule
I. Part 35
The PFRCA, enacted in 1986, authorizes agencies, with approval from
the Department of Justice, to pursue individuals or firms for false
claims. The maximum liability under the PFRCA is $5,000 for each false
claim, up to a maximum of $150,000, in addition to twice the amount of
the claim submitted contrary to the PFRCA.
According to OMB guidance, the multiplier for the PFRCA (a 1986
statute) is 2.15628; therefore, the new maximum penalty for each false
claim or statement is $10,781, up to a maximum of $323,442.
II. Part 103
The CWC Act provided domestic implementation of the Convention on
the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling, and Use of
Chemical Weapons and on Their Destruction. The penalty provisions of
the CWC Act are codified at 22 U.S.C. 6761. A person violating 22
U.S.C. 6761(a)(1)(A), Prohibited acts relating to inspections, is
subject to a civil penalty of an amount not to exceed $25,000 for each
such violation. A person violating 22 U.S.C. 6761(a)(1)(B),
Recordkeeping violations, is subject to a civil penalty in an amount
not to exceed $5,000 for each such violation.
According to OMB Guidance, the multiplier for the CWC Act (a 1998
statute) is 1.45023. Therefore, the new maximum civil monetary penalty
for prohibited acts relating to inspections is $36,256 for each
violation; and the new maximum civil monetary penalty for recordkeeping
violations is $7,251 for each such violation.
III. Part 127
The Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military Affairs is
responsible for the imposition of CMPs under the International Traffic
in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which is administered by the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls (DDTC). Each of the penalty provisions of the
AECA provides that the CMP for each relevant violation may not exceed
$500,000.
(1) AECA Section 38(e)
The most recent statutory modification of the CMPs provided for
under AECA section 38(e), 22 U.S.C. 2778(e), occurred in 1985 when the
maximum penalty amount was capped at $500,000 per violation. According
to OMB guidance, the multiplier for AECA section 38(e) is 2.18802;
therefore, the new maximum penalty will be $1,094,010 per violation.
(2) AECA Section 39A(c)
The most recent statutory modification of the CMPs provided for
under AECA section 39A(c), 22 U.S.C. 2779a(c), occurred in 1994 when
the maximum penalty amount was capped at $500,000 per violation.
According to OMB guidance, the multiplier for AECA section 39A(c) is
1.59089; therefore, the new maximum adjusted penalty level will be
$795,445 per violation.
(3) AECA Section 40(k)
The most recent statutory modification of the CMPs provided for
under AECA section 40(k), 22 U.S.C. 2780(k), occurred in 1989 when the
maximum penalty amount was capped at $500,000 per violation. According
to OMB guidance, the multiplier for AECA section 40(k) is 1.89361;
therefore, the new maximum adjusted penalty level will be $946,805 per
violation.
IV. Part 138
Section 319 of Public Law 101-121, codified at 31 U.S.C. 1352,
provides penalties for recipients of federal contracts, grants, and
loans who use appropriated funds to lobby the Executive or Legislative
Branches of the federal government in connection with a specific
contract, grant, or loan. Any person who violates that prohibition is
subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than
$100,000 for each such expenditure. The statute also requires each
person who requests or receives a federal contract, grant, cooperative
agreement, loan, or a federal commitment to insure or guarantee a loan,
to disclose any lobbying; the penalty for failure to disclose is not
less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
According to OMB guidance, the multiplier for 31 U.S.C. 1352 (a
1989 statute) is 1.89361. Therefore, the new maximum civil violations
under the statute, for both improper expenditures and failure to
disclose, are: Not less than $18,936 and not more than $189,361.
Effective Date of Penalties
The revised CMP amounts will go into effect on August 1, 2016. All
violations for which CMPs are assessed after the effective date of this
rule, regardless of whether the violation occurred before the effective
date, will be assessed at the adjusted penalty level.
Future Adjustments and Reporting
The 2015 Act directs agencies to undertake an annual review of CMPs
using a formula prescribed by the statute. Hereafter, annual
adjustments to CMPs will be made in accordance with the guidance issued
by OMB. The Department of State will publish notification of annual
inflation adjustments to CMPs in the Federal Register no later than
January 15 of each year, with the adjusted amount taking effect
immediately upon publication. Furthermore, OMB Circular A-136,
Financial Reporting Requirements, directs agencies to identify any
changes to CMPs in the Agency Financial Report (AFR), including the
affected penalties, dates and amounts of adjustments, and applicable
statutes and regulations.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is publishing this rule using the ``good
cause'' exception to the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553(b)), as the Department has determined that public comment on this
rulemaking would be impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. This rulemaking is mandatory; it implements Public Law 114-
74.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Because this rulemaking is exempt from Section 553 of the
Administrative Procedures Act, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not
required.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule does not involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore,
no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rule has been found not to be a major rule within the meaning
of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking does not have sufficient federalism implications to
require consultations or warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary
[[Page 36793]]
impact statement. The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on federal programs and
activities do not apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
The Department believes that benefits of the rulemaking outweigh
any costs, and there are no feasible alternatives to this rulemaking.
It is the Department's position that this rulemaking is not an
economically significant rule under the criteria of Executive Order
12866, and is consistent with the provisions of Executive Order 13563.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed the proposed amendment in
light of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not preempt
tribal law. Accordingly, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking does not impose or revise any information
collections subject to 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
List of Subjects
22 CFR Part 35
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Fraud, Penalties.
22 CFR Part 103
Administrative practice and procedure, Chemicals, Classified
information, Foreign relations, Freedom of information, International
organization, Investigations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
22 CFR Part 127
Arms and munitions, Exports.
22 CFR Part 138
Government contracts, Grant programs, Loan programs, Lobbying,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth above, 22 CFR parts 127, 35, 103, and 138
are amended as follows:
PART 35--PROGRAM FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 35 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.; Pub. L.
114-74, 129 Stat. 584.
0
2. In Sec. 35.3:
0
a. Remove ``$5,000'' and add in its place ``$10,781'', wherever it
occurs.
0
b. Add paragraph (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 35.3 Basis for civil penalties and assessments.
* * * * *
(f) The maximum penalty for each false claim or statement is
$10,781, up to a maximum of $323,442.
PART 103--REGULATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS
CONVENTION AND THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION IMPLEMENTATION ACT
OF 1998 ON THE TAKING OF SAMPLES AND ON ENFORCEMENT OF REQUIREMENTS
CONCERNING RECORDKEEPING AND INSPECTIONS
0
3. The authority citation for part 103 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22 U.S.C. 6701 et seq.; Pub. L.
114-74, 129 Stat. 584.
Sec. 103.6 [Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 103.6 to remove ``$25,000'' and add in its place
``$36,256'' in paragraph (a)(1), and to remove ``$5,000'', and add in
its place $7,251'' in paragraph (a)(2).
PART 127--VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES
0
5. The authority citation for part 127 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 2, 38, and 42, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744
(22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2791); 22 U.S.C. 401; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 22
U.S.C. 2779a; 22 U.S.C. 2780; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129; Pub. L. 114-
74, 129 Stat. 584.
0
6. Section 127.10 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 127.10 Civil penalty.
(a)(1) The Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military
Affairs is authorized to impose a civil penalty, as follows:
(i) For each violation of 22 U.S.C. 2778, an amount not to exceed
$1,094,010;
(ii) For each violation of 22 U.S.C. 2779a, an amount not to exceed
$795,445; and
(iii) For each violation of 22 U.S.C. 2780, an amount not to exceed
$946,805.
(2) The civil penalty may be either in addition to, or in lieu of,
any other liability or penalty which may be imposed.
* * * * *
PART 138--NEW RESTRICTIONS ON LOBBYING
0
7. The authority citation for part 138 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a; 31 U.S.C. 1352; Pub. L. 114-74, 129
Stat. 584.
Sec. 138.400 [Amended]
0
8. Amend Sec. 138.400 by removing ``$10,000'' and ``$100,000'', and
adding in their place ``$18,936'' and ``$189,361'' respectively,
wherever they occur.
Dated: June 1, 2016.
Lisa Aguirre,
Managing Director, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls Department of
State.
[FR Doc. 2016-13455 Filed 6-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P