Amendment to the Export Administration Regulations: Removal of Special Iraq Reconstruction License, 36481-36484 [2016-13397]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA),
Public Law 111–296, that affect the
integrity of the Child Nutrition
Programs, including the National School
Lunch Program (NSLP), the Special
Milk Program for Children (SMP), the
School Breakfast Program (SBP), the
Summer Food Service Program (SFSP),
the Child and Adult Care Food Program
(CACFP), and State Administrative
Expense Funds (SAE). In addition, this
rule would incorporate policy changes
resulting from several findings from
recently conducted targeted
management evaluations of the CACFP
by the Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), and USDA Office of Inspector
General audit findings, as well as other
miscellaneous revisions to the
regulations. The rule is intended to
improve the integrity of all Child
Nutrition Programs.
USDA anticipates that the provisions
under this proposed rule would be
implemented 90 days following
publication of the final rule, with the
exception of those related to CACFP
audit funds and those related to
assessments against State agencies and
program operators. The provision
granting eligible State agencies
additional CACFP audit funds will be
implemented upon publication of the
final rule. Because States and school
districts have been working diligently to
implement the provisions of the
Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act, USDA
anticipates that the provision
establishing criteria for assessments
against State agencies and program
operators would be implemented one
school year following publication of the
final rule to provide entities the time
they need to complete successful
implementation.
Summary of the Major Provisions of the
Regulatory Action
The major provisions addressed in
this rule are:
Section 303 of the HHFKA: Fines for
Violating Program Requirements—
Section 303 of the HHFKA requires the
Secretary to establish criteria for the
imposition of fines in the Child
Nutrition Programs, referred to as
assessments in this proposed rule. An
assessment refers to a required payment
of funds from non-Federal sources.
Under section 303, the Secretary or a
State agency may establish an
assessment against any school food
authority or school administering the
Child Nutrition Programs if the
Secretary or the State agency determines
that the school or school food authority
failed to correct severe mismanagement
of any program, failed to correct
repeated violations of program
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:04 Jun 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
requirements, or disregarded a
requirement of which they have been
informed. Section 303 also provides the
Secretary the authority to establish an
assessment against any State agency if
the Secretary determines the State
agency has failed to correct severe
mismanagement of any program, failed
to correct repeated violations of program
requirements, or disregarded a
requirement of which they have been
informed.
Section 322 of the HHFKA: SFSP
Disqualification—Section 322 requires
the Secretary to establish procedures for
the termination and disqualification of
entities participating in the SFSP, to
maintain a list of entities that have been
terminated or disqualified from SFSP,
and to make this list available to States
for use in approving or renewing service
institutions’ applications for SFSP
participation.
Section 331(b) of the HHFKA: State
Agency/Sponsor Review Requirements
in the CACFP—Section 331(b) requires
the Secretary to develop for State
agencies additional criteria or priorities
for use in choosing institutions for
review, including institutions at risk of
having serious management problems
and institutions conducting activities
other than the CACFP.
Section 332 of the HHFKA: State
Liability for Payments to Aggrieved
Child Care Institutions—Section 332
requires State agencies to pay all valid
claims for reimbursement, from nonFederal sources, if the required
timeframes for a fair hearing are not
met.
Section 335 of the HHFKA: CACFP
Audit Funding—Section 335 allows the
Department to increase the amount of
audit funds made available to a CACFP
State agency if the State agency
demonstrates it can effectively use the
funds to improve Program management
in accordance with criteria established
by the Department.
Section 362 of the HHFKA:
Disqualified Schools, Institutions, and
Individuals—Section 362 makes any
school, institution, service institution,
facility, or individual that has been
terminated from any Child Nutrition
Program and who is on the CACFP or
SFSP National Disqualified List
ineligible for participation in or
administration of any Child Nutrition
Program.
Costs and Benefits
While all entities—school food
authorities, schools, institutions,
sponsors sites, sponsoring
organizations, day care centers and State
agencies—administering Child Nutrition
Programs will be affected by this
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
36481
rulemaking, the economic effect is not
expected to be significant as explained
below.
The comment period for this
proposed rule is extended until July 7,
2016 to provide additional time for
interested parties to review and submit
comments on this proposed rule.
Dated: June 2, 2016.
Yvette S. Jackson,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–13489 Filed 6–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 730, 747, 748, and 762
[Docket No. 160303182–6182–01]
RIN 0694–AG89
Amendment to the Export
Administration Regulations: Removal
of Special Iraq Reconstruction License
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this rule, the Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS) proposes to
amend the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) to remove the Special
Iraq Reconstruction License (SIRL) from
the EAR. The action, if published in
final form, would further the objectives
of the Retrospective Regulatory Review
Initiative that directs BIS and other
federal agencies to streamline
regulations and reduce unnecessary
regulatory burdens on the public.
Specifically, the SIRL is outdated and
seldom used by exporters, who now
have more efficient options for exports
and reexports to Iraq and transfers (incountry) in Iraq. This rule also makes
conforming changes.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. The identification
number for this rulemaking is BIS–
2016–0017.
• By email directly to:
publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include
RIN 0694–AG89 in the subject line.
• By mail or delivery to Regulatory
Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce,
Room 2099B, 14th Street and
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington,
DC 20230. Refer to RIN 0694–AG89.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM
07JNP1
36482
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Thomas Andrukonis, Director, Export
Management and Compliance Division,
Office of Exporter Services, Bureau of
Industry and Security, by telephone at
(202) 482–8016 or by email at
Thomas.Andrukonis@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In this rule, the Bureau of Industry
and Security (BIS) proposes to continue
to advance the President’s directives in
the Retrospective Regulatory Review
Initiative to streamline regulations,
reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens
on the public and modernize export
controls. (See ‘‘Improving Regulatory
Review’’ (Executive Order 13563 of
January 18, 2011). Consistent with these
directives and objectives, in this rule,
BIS proposes to remove the Special Iraq
Reconstruction License (SIRL) from the
Export Administration Regulations
(EAR).
BIS established the SIRL in 2004 (69
FR 46070, July 30, 2004) to supplement
options to facilitate exports and
reexports to Iraq and transfers within
Iraq of items in furtherance of civil
reconstruction and other projects in Iraq
funded by specified entities, including
the United States government. At the
time of its establishment, SIRL was
intended to benefit the public by
allowing for faster processing times as
compared to individual license
applications, and longer license validity
periods, which would extend to the
completion or discontinuation of the
associated reconstruction project (in
contrast, individual license applications
generally only had a two-year validity
period). However, exporters supplying
items used in support of the civil
reconstruction efforts in Iraq have not
relied on the SIRL to advance those
efforts, apparently because of its
complexity and narrowness.
Since 2004, BIS has processed only
three applications for the SIRL, and
granted only one approval, as compared
to over 400 approved individual license
applications for items to Iraq between
2012 and 2015. A SIRL applicant must
provide details regarding the items to be
exported or reexported to or transferred
within Iraq, a narrative statement to
identify all parties to the transaction,
and a description of the reconstruction
project that formed the basis of the
transaction. In addition, the applicant
must provide separate written
statements from all agencies providing
funding, and certification that all parties
to the transaction will obtain licenses
prior to transferring the items on the
license application within Iraq or
reexporting the items to end users not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jun 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
authorized under the SIRL. SIRL holders
must submit reports when the Iraq
project is discontinued or is completed
and must get approval from BIS to make
specified changes to the respective
SIRL. These requirements are numerous
compared to the individual license
application process or the use of other
authorizations such as eligible license
exceptions, resulting in exporters
choosing to apply for or use individual
licenses and other authorizations under
the EAR to ship items to Iraq instead of
the SIRL.
In addition, with the implementation
of updates to the EAR, the relative
advantages of the SIRL have been offset
by changes to individual licenses and
other types of authorizations offered by
BIS that provide less complex
alternatives to the SIRL. For example, in
addition to streamlined procedures for
submitting license applications and
improved processing times, BIS now
issues individual licenses with a fouryear validity period, with agency
consideration of requests to extend the
validity period. Similarly, most
individual licenses now do not include
a requirement for reports on the
authorized items exported or
reexported. Additionally, license
exceptions such as License Exception
Temporary imports, exports, and
reexports, and transfers (in-country)
(TMP) (Section 740.9 of the EAR) have
been expanded. (TMP now includes
authorizations for temporary exports to
a U.S. person’s foreign subsidiary,
affiliates, or facility abroad outside of
Country Group B. Additionally, BIS
will, upon request, authorize the
retention of items abroad that were
exported under License Exception TMP
beyond one year and up to a total of four
years.)
Thus, the SIRL has proven not to be
useful. Its removal from the EAR is
consistent with and would advance
regulatory initiatives priorities. As part
of the removal, this rule also would
make conforming changes in the EAR.
Export Administration Act
Although the Export Administration
Act expired on August 20, 2001, the
President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by
Executive Order 13637 of March 8,
2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and
as extended by the Notice of August 7,
2015, 80 FR 48233 (August 11, 2015),
has continued the Export
Administration Regulations in effect
under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to
carry out the provisions of the Export
Administration Act, as appropriate and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to the extent permitted by law, pursuant
to Executive Order 13222 as amended
by Executive Order 13637.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. This rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
2. This rule amends collections
previously approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
Control Numbers 0694–0088,
‘‘Simplified Network Application
Processing + System (SNAP+) and the
Multi-Purpose Application,’’ which
carries a burden hour estimate of 43.8
minutes to prepare and submit form
BIS–748; and 0694–0137, ‘‘License
Exemptions and Exclusions.’’
The total burden hours associated
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA) and
the aforementioned OMB Control
Numbers would be expected to decrease
as a result of this proposed removal of
part 747 of the EAR and related
provisions if the rule is eventually
issued in final form, thereby reducing
burden hours associated with approved
collections related to the EAR.
Public comment is sought regarding:
whether the collection of information,
for the provisions BIS proposes to
remove, is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
the accuracy of the burden estimate;
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information,
including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. Send comments
on these or any other aspects of the
collection of information to Regulatory
Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and
Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
at the ADDRESSES above, and email to
OMB at OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM
07JNP1
36483
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined under Executive Order
13132.
4. Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The Chief Counsel
for Regulation of the Department of
Commerce has certified to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration that this
proposed rule, if adopted in final form,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Economic Impact. BIS believes this
rule would have no economic impact,
because, although this rule would
eliminate the availability of the SIRL,
entities are not using the SIRL.
Moreover, they could still obtain
individual validated licenses from BIS
to export their product(s). The
individual validated licenses that BIS
issues are generally less burdensome
and require fewer compliance/reporting
measures than the measures required for
a SIRL. For example, a SIRL applicant
must provide a narrative statement to
identify all parties to the transaction,
and a description of the reconstruction
project. In addition, the applicant must
provide separate written statements for
all participating agencies and
certification that all parties to the
transaction will obtain licenses prior to
transferring items within Iraq or
reexporting items outside of Iraq for end
users not authorized under the SIRL.
SIRL holders must submit reports when
the Iraq project is discontinued or is
completed and must get prior approval
for any changes to their SIRL. Although
these requirements may be included as
conditions on an individual validated
license, BIS’s license applications
review process for individual validated
licenses includes other methods, less
burdensome on the exporter, to vet the
bona fides of parties to the proposed
transaction and to verify compliance.
Also, impacted entities would have the
convenience of applying for a license
via the Simplified Network Application
Process-Redesign (SNAP–R) System, an
updated system for electronically filing
export and reexport license
applications, which is not available for
the submission of SIRL applications.
Finally, the historical lack of usage of
the SIRL does not warrant maintaining
such a complex option.
Number of Small Entities. Since the
SIRL’s introduction in 2004, there have
been only three applications for it, with
only one application approved. Due to
the nature of the SIRL and the
complexity of its requirements, BIS
expects that past applicants would be
considered large entities under the
Small Business Administration’s size
standards. However, BIS does not
collect data on the size or annual
revenue of these entities, and thus some
of these entities may be considered
small under the SBA size standards.
Also, although small entities likely
would not be the direct or the primary
users of the SIRL, BIS acknowledges
that small entities may have been
parties to SIRL transactions. To assist in
the evaluation of a significant economic
impact of this rule on a substantial
number of small entities, BIS welcomes
comments to explain how and to what
extent your business or organization
could be affected, if your business or
organization is a small entity and if
adoption of any of the amendments
discussed in this proposed rulemaking
could have a significant financial
impact on your operations.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 730
Administrative practice and
procedure, Advisory committees,
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Strategic and critical
materials.
15 CFR Part 747
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Foreign trade,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
15 CFR Part 748
Administrative practice and
procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 762
Administrative practice and
procedure, Business and industry,
Collection No.
16:45 Jun 06, 2016
Accordingly, parts 730, 747, 748 and
762 of the Export Administration
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774) are
amended as follows:
PART 730—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 730
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C.
7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note;
22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30
U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 43
U.S.C. 1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. 4305;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
11912, 41 FR 15825, 3 CFR, 1976 Comp., p.
114; E.O. 12002, 42 FR 35623, 3 CFR, 1977
Comp., p. 133; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3
CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12214, 45 FR
29783, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 256; E.O.
12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p.
608; E.O. 12854, 58 FR 36587, 3 CFR, 1993
Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205, 3
CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899; E.O. 12938, 59 FR
59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O.
12947, 60 FR 5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p.
356; E.O. 12981, 60 FR 62981, 3 CFR, 1995
Comp., p. 419; E.O. 13020, 61 FR 54079, 3
CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 219; E.O. 13026, 61 FR
58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O.
13099, 63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p.
208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; E.O. 13338, 69 FR
26751, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p 168; E.O.
13637, 78 FR 16129, 3 CFR, 2014 Comp., p.
223; Notice of May 6, 2015, 80 FR 26815
(May 8, 2015); Notice of August 7, 2015, 80
FR 48233 (August 11, 2015); Notice of
September 18, 2015, 80 FR 57281 (September
22, 2015); Notice of November 12, 2015, 80
FR 70667 (November 13, 2015); Notice of
January 20, 2016, 81 FR 3937 (January 22,
2016).
Supplement No. 1 to Part 730—
[Amended]
2. Supplement No. 1 to Part 730 is
amended by revising the entry for
Collection number ‘‘0694–0129’’. The
revision reads as follows:
■
SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO PART 730—
INFORMATION COLLECTION
REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE
PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT: OMB
CONTROL NUMBERS
*
Title
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
*
*
*
*
Reference in the EAR
*
*
*
*
0694–0129 ........................... Export and Reexport Controls For Iraq ..........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Confidential business information,
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
§§ 732.3, 738, 744.18, 746.3(b)(1), 750, 758, 762, 772,
774.
E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM
07JNP1
36484
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
PART 747—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
■
3. Remove and reserve part 747.
PART 748—[AMENDED]
4. The authority citation for part 748
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767,
3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66
FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice
of August 7, 2015, 80 FR 48233 (August 11,
2015).
§ 748.1—[Amended]
5. Section 748.1 is amended by
removing the parenthetical phrase
‘‘(other than Special Iraq Reconstruction
License applications)’’ from the first
sentence of paragraph (d).
■
§ 748.7—[Amended]
6. Section 748.7 is amended by
removing the parenthetical phrase
‘‘(other than Special Iraq Reconstruction
Licenses)’’ from paragraphs (a) and (d).
■
PART 762—[AMENDED]
7. The authority citation for part 762
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025,
3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August
7, 2015, 80 FR 48233 (August 11, 2015).
§ 762.2—[Amended]
8. Section 762.2 is amended by
removing and reserving paragraph
(b)(17).
■
Dated: June 1, 2016.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016–13397 Filed 6–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Parts 1, 38, 40, and 170
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
RIN 3038–AD52
Public Staff Roundtable on Elements
of Regulation Automated Trading;
Reopening of Comment Period
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of staff roundtable
discussion; reopening of comment
period.
AGENCY:
On June 10, 2016, staff of the
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (CFTC or Commission) will
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jun 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
hold a public roundtable meeting, at
which invited participants will discuss
specific elements of the Commission’s
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
regarding Regulation Automated
Trading (Regulation AT). The staff
roundtable, which will be held at the
Commission’s Washington, DC, office,
will commence at 9:00 a.m. and end at
4:00 p.m. Additional information,
including the agenda, is available in the
‘‘Press Room’’ section of the
Commission’s Web site at www.cftc.gov.
In conjunction with the staff roundtable
on June 10, the Commission is
reopening the comment period for
specific elements of Regulation AT. This
additional comment period is intended
to accept public comments solely on the
specific items in the agenda and that
arise during the staff roundtable.
DATES: The staff roundtable will take
place on Friday, June 10, 2016,
commencing at 9:00 a.m. and ending at
4:00 p.m. The comment period will be
reopened as of June 10, 2016, and will
close on June 24, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Roundtable: The staff
roundtable will take place in the
Conference Center at the Commission’s
headquarters at Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street NW., Washington, DC.
Comments: Members of the public
may submit comment letters, identified
by RIN 3038–AD52, by any of the
following methods:
• CFTC Web site: https://
comments.cftc.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
through the Comments Online process
on the Web site.
• Mail: Send to Christopher
Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the
Commission, Commodity Futures
Trading Commission, Three Lafayette
Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20581.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
Mail, above.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regarding the staff roundtable, please
contact the CFTC’s Office of Public
Affairs at (202) 418–5080. Regarding the
proposed rules in Regulation AT, please
contact Sebastian Pujol Schott,
Associate Director, Division of Market
Oversight (DMO), sps@cftc.gov or 202–
418–5641; Marilee Dahlman, Special
Counsel, DMO, mdahlman@cftc.gov or
202–418–5264; Mark Schlegel, Special
Counsel, DMO, mschlegel@cftc.gov or
202–418–5055; Andrew Ridenour,
Special Counsel, DMO, aridenour@
cftc.gov or 202–418–5438; Joseph
Otchin, Attorney Advisor, DMO,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
jotchin@cftc.gov or 202–418–5623;
Michael Penick, Economist, Office of
the Chief Economist (OCE), mpenick@
cftc.gov or 202–418–5279; Richard
Haynes, Supervisory Research Analyst,
OCE, rhaynes@cftc.gov or 202–418–
5063; Carlin Metzger, Trial Attorney,
Division of Enforcement, cmetzger@
cftc.gov or 312–596–0536; or John
Dunfee, Assistant General Counsel,
Office of General Counsel, jdunfee@
cftc.gov or 202–418–5396.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Commission’s NPRM for
Regulation Automated Trading was
published in the Federal Register on
December 17, 2015 (80 FR 78824). The
NPRM was open for a 90-day comment
period, from December 17, 2015 through
March 16, 2016. The comment file for
Regulation AT is available at: https://
comments.cftc.gov/PublicComments/
CommentList.aspx?id=1646.
II. Staff Roundtable Agenda
The staff roundtable 1 on June 10,
2016 will address the following items:
(1) potential amendments to the
proposed definition of ‘‘Direct
Electronic Access’’ (DEA), consistent
with and in furtherance of Regulation
AT’s proposed registration regime; (2)
potential quantitative measures to
establish the population of AT Persons;
(3) a potential alternative to Regulation
AT’s requirements for AT Persons in
proposed §§ 1.80, 1.81, and 1.83(a),
which alternative could require that
FCMs impose specific requirements on
their customers and perform due
diligence regarding customers’
compliance; (4) AT Persons’ compliance
with Regulation AT’s proposed
requirements for Algorithmic Trading
and Algorithmic Trading systems when
using third-party algorithms or systems;
and (5) source code access and
retention.
The staff roundtable will be open to
the public with seating on a first-come,
first-served basis, and will take place in
the Conference Center at the
Commission’s headquarters at Three
Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW.,
Washington, DC. Members of the public
may also listen by telephone. Call-in
participants should be prepared to
provide their first name, last name, and
affiliation. The information for the
conference call may be found on the
CFTC’s Web site at www.cftc.gov.
1 See ‘‘CFTC Staff to Hold Roundtable on Certain
Elements of Regulation AT,’’ (May 27, 2016),
available at: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/
PressReleases/pr7377-16.
E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM
07JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 36481-36484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13397]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 730, 747, 748, and 762
[Docket No. 160303182-6182-01]
RIN 0694-AG89
Amendment to the Export Administration Regulations: Removal of
Special Iraq Reconstruction License
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
proposes to amend the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) to remove
the Special Iraq Reconstruction License (SIRL) from the EAR. The
action, if published in final form, would further the objectives of the
Retrospective Regulatory Review Initiative that directs BIS and other
federal agencies to streamline regulations and reduce unnecessary
regulatory burdens on the public. Specifically, the SIRL is outdated
and seldom used by exporters, who now have more efficient options for
exports and reexports to Iraq and transfers (in-country) in Iraq. This
rule also makes conforming changes.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
The identification number for this rulemaking is BIS-2016-0017.
By email directly to: publiccomments@bis.doc.gov. Include
RIN 0694-AG89 in the subject line.
By mail or delivery to Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau
of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Room 2099B, 14th
Street and Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. Refer to RIN
0694-AG89.
[[Page 36482]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Andrukonis, Director, Export
Management and Compliance Division, Office of Exporter Services, Bureau
of Industry and Security, by telephone at (202) 482-8016 or by email at
Thomas.Andrukonis@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In this rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) proposes to
continue to advance the President's directives in the Retrospective
Regulatory Review Initiative to streamline regulations, reduce
unnecessary regulatory burdens on the public and modernize export
controls. (See ``Improving Regulatory Review'' (Executive Order 13563
of January 18, 2011). Consistent with these directives and objectives,
in this rule, BIS proposes to remove the Special Iraq Reconstruction
License (SIRL) from the Export Administration Regulations (EAR).
BIS established the SIRL in 2004 (69 FR 46070, July 30, 2004) to
supplement options to facilitate exports and reexports to Iraq and
transfers within Iraq of items in furtherance of civil reconstruction
and other projects in Iraq funded by specified entities, including the
United States government. At the time of its establishment, SIRL was
intended to benefit the public by allowing for faster processing times
as compared to individual license applications, and longer license
validity periods, which would extend to the completion or
discontinuation of the associated reconstruction project (in contrast,
individual license applications generally only had a two-year validity
period). However, exporters supplying items used in support of the
civil reconstruction efforts in Iraq have not relied on the SIRL to
advance those efforts, apparently because of its complexity and
narrowness.
Since 2004, BIS has processed only three applications for the SIRL,
and granted only one approval, as compared to over 400 approved
individual license applications for items to Iraq between 2012 and
2015. A SIRL applicant must provide details regarding the items to be
exported or reexported to or transferred within Iraq, a narrative
statement to identify all parties to the transaction, and a description
of the reconstruction project that formed the basis of the transaction.
In addition, the applicant must provide separate written statements
from all agencies providing funding, and certification that all parties
to the transaction will obtain licenses prior to transferring the items
on the license application within Iraq or reexporting the items to end
users not authorized under the SIRL. SIRL holders must submit reports
when the Iraq project is discontinued or is completed and must get
approval from BIS to make specified changes to the respective SIRL.
These requirements are numerous compared to the individual license
application process or the use of other authorizations such as eligible
license exceptions, resulting in exporters choosing to apply for or use
individual licenses and other authorizations under the EAR to ship
items to Iraq instead of the SIRL.
In addition, with the implementation of updates to the EAR, the
relative advantages of the SIRL have been offset by changes to
individual licenses and other types of authorizations offered by BIS
that provide less complex alternatives to the SIRL. For example, in
addition to streamlined procedures for submitting license applications
and improved processing times, BIS now issues individual licenses with
a four-year validity period, with agency consideration of requests to
extend the validity period. Similarly, most individual licenses now do
not include a requirement for reports on the authorized items exported
or reexported. Additionally, license exceptions such as License
Exception Temporary imports, exports, and reexports, and transfers (in-
country) (TMP) (Section 740.9 of the EAR) have been expanded. (TMP now
includes authorizations for temporary exports to a U.S. person's
foreign subsidiary, affiliates, or facility abroad outside of Country
Group B. Additionally, BIS will, upon request, authorize the retention
of items abroad that were exported under License Exception TMP beyond
one year and up to a total of four years.)
Thus, the SIRL has proven not to be useful. Its removal from the
EAR is consistent with and would advance regulatory initiatives
priorities. As part of the removal, this rule also would make
conforming changes in the EAR.
Export Administration Act
Although the Export Administration Act expired on August 20, 2001,
the President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR,
2001 Comp., p. 783 (2002), as amended by Executive Order 13637 of March
8, 2013, 78 FR 16129 (March 13, 2013) and as extended by the Notice of
August 7, 2015, 80 FR 48233 (August 11, 2015), has continued the Export
Administration Regulations in effect under the International Emergency
Economic Powers Act. BIS continues to carry out the provisions of the
Export Administration Act, as appropriate and to the extent permitted
by law, pursuant to Executive Order 13222 as amended by Executive Order
13637.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. Executive Orders 13563 and 12866 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
2. This rule amends collections previously approved by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) under Control Numbers 0694-0088,
``Simplified Network Application Processing + System (SNAP+) and the
Multi-Purpose Application,'' which carries a burden hour estimate of
43.8 minutes to prepare and submit form BIS-748; and 0694-0137,
``License Exemptions and Exclusions.''
The total burden hours associated with the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA) and the aforementioned OMB
Control Numbers would be expected to decrease as a result of this
proposed removal of part 747 of the EAR and related provisions if the
rule is eventually issued in final form, thereby reducing burden hours
associated with approved collections related to the EAR.
Public comment is sought regarding: whether the collection of
information, for the provisions BIS proposes to remove, is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of
the burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Send
comments on these or any other aspects of the collection of information
to Regulatory Policy Division, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S.
Department of Commerce at the ADDRESSES above, and email to OMB at
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply
[[Page 36483]]
with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the
PRA, unless that collection of information displays a currently valid
OMB Control Number.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under Executive Order 13132.
4. Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The
Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce has
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that this proposed rule, if adopted in final form, would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Economic Impact. BIS believes this rule would have no economic
impact, because, although this rule would eliminate the availability of
the SIRL, entities are not using the SIRL. Moreover, they could still
obtain individual validated licenses from BIS to export their
product(s). The individual validated licenses that BIS issues are
generally less burdensome and require fewer compliance/reporting
measures than the measures required for a SIRL. For example, a SIRL
applicant must provide a narrative statement to identify all parties to
the transaction, and a description of the reconstruction project. In
addition, the applicant must provide separate written statements for
all participating agencies and certification that all parties to the
transaction will obtain licenses prior to transferring items within
Iraq or reexporting items outside of Iraq for end users not authorized
under the SIRL. SIRL holders must submit reports when the Iraq project
is discontinued or is completed and must get prior approval for any
changes to their SIRL. Although these requirements may be included as
conditions on an individual validated license, BIS's license
applications review process for individual validated licenses includes
other methods, less burdensome on the exporter, to vet the bona fides
of parties to the proposed transaction and to verify compliance. Also,
impacted entities would have the convenience of applying for a license
via the Simplified Network Application Process-Redesign (SNAP-R)
System, an updated system for electronically filing export and reexport
license applications, which is not available for the submission of SIRL
applications. Finally, the historical lack of usage of the SIRL does
not warrant maintaining such a complex option.
Number of Small Entities. Since the SIRL's introduction in 2004,
there have been only three applications for it, with only one
application approved. Due to the nature of the SIRL and the complexity
of its requirements, BIS expects that past applicants would be
considered large entities under the Small Business Administration's
size standards. However, BIS does not collect data on the size or
annual revenue of these entities, and thus some of these entities may
be considered small under the SBA size standards. Also, although small
entities likely would not be the direct or the primary users of the
SIRL, BIS acknowledges that small entities may have been parties to
SIRL transactions. To assist in the evaluation of a significant
economic impact of this rule on a substantial number of small entities,
BIS welcomes comments to explain how and to what extent your business
or organization could be affected, if your business or organization is
a small entity and if adoption of any of the amendments discussed in
this proposed rulemaking could have a significant financial impact on
your operations.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 730
Administrative practice and procedure, Advisory committees,
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Strategic and
critical materials.
15 CFR Part 747
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Foreign trade,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 748
Administrative practice and procedure, Exports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
15 CFR Part 762
Administrative practice and procedure, Business and industry,
Confidential business information, Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, parts 730, 747, 748 and 762 of the Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR parts 730-774) are amended as
follows:
PART 730--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 730 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 10
U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note;
22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42
U.S.C. 2139a; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 15 U.S.C. 1824a; 50 U.S.C. 4305; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 11912, 41 FR 15825, 3 CFR,
1976 Comp., p. 114; E.O. 12002, 42 FR 35623, 3 CFR, 1977 Comp., p.
133; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12214,
45 FR 29783, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 256; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3
CFR, 1993 Comp., p. 608; E.O. 12854, 58 FR 36587, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp.,
p. 179; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899; E.O.
12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 12947, 60 FR
5079, 3 CFR, 1995 Comp., p. 356; E.O. 12981, 60 FR 62981, 3 CFR,
1995 Comp., p. 419; E.O. 13020, 61 FR 54079, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
219; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099,
63 FR 45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp.,
p. 786; E.O. 13338, 69 FR 26751, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p 168; E.O.
13637, 78 FR 16129, 3 CFR, 2014 Comp., p. 223; Notice of May 6,
2015, 80 FR 26815 (May 8, 2015); Notice of August 7, 2015, 80 FR
48233 (August 11, 2015); Notice of September 18, 2015, 80 FR 57281
(September 22, 2015); Notice of November 12, 2015, 80 FR 70667
(November 13, 2015); Notice of January 20, 2016, 81 FR 3937 (January
22, 2016).
Supplement No. 1 to Part 730-- [Amended]
0
2. Supplement No. 1 to Part 730 is amended by revising the entry for
Collection number ``0694-0129''. The revision reads as follows:
SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO PART 730--INFORMATION COLLECTION REQUIREMENTS UNDER
THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT: OMB CONTROL NUMBERS
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Collection No. Title Reference in the EAR
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
0694-0129................... Export and Reexport Sec. Sec. 732.3,
Controls For Iraq. 738, 744.18,
746.3(b)(1), 750,
758, 762, 772, 774.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 36484]]
* * * * *
PART 747--[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
0
3. Remove and reserve part 747.
PART 748--[AMENDED]
0
4. The authority citation for part 748 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR
44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 7, 2015, 80 FR
48233 (August 11, 2015).
Sec. 748.1--[Amended]
0
5. Section 748.1 is amended by removing the parenthetical phrase
``(other than Special Iraq Reconstruction License applications)'' from
the first sentence of paragraph (d).
Sec. 748.7--[Amended]
0
6. Section 748.7 is amended by removing the parenthetical phrase
``(other than Special Iraq Reconstruction Licenses)'' from paragraphs
(a) and (d).
PART 762--[AMENDED]
0
7. The authority citation for part 762 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; E.O.
13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; Notice of August 7,
2015, 80 FR 48233 (August 11, 2015).
Sec. 762.2--[Amended]
0
8. Section 762.2 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph
(b)(17).
Dated: June 1, 2016.
Kevin J. Wolf,
Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2016-13397 Filed 6-6-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P