Notice of Lodging of Proposed Modification to Consent Decree Under the Clean Water Act, 36584-36585 [2016-13330]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
36584
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 7, 2016 / Notices
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3E–
405B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: June 1, 2016.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2016–13305 Filed 6–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms
and Explosives
[OMB Number 1140–0055]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed eCollection
eComments Requested; Identification
of Explosive Materials
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives, Department of
Justice.
ACTION: 60-day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will
submit the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until
August 8, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Anita Scheddel, Program Analyst,
Explosives Industry Programs Branch,
99 New York Ave. NE., Washington, DC
20226 at email: eipbinformationcollection@atf.gov. Written
comments and/or suggestions can also
be directed to the Office of Management
and Budget, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Attention
Department of Justice Desk Officer,
Washington, DC 20503 or sent to OIRA_
submissions@omb.eop.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:13 Jun 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection
(check justification or form 83–I):
Revision of a currently approved
collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
Identification of Explosive Materials.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Form number (if applicable): None.
Component: Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S.
Department of Justice.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: Business or other for-profit.
Other (if applicable): None.
Abstract: Marking of explosives
enables law enforcement entities to
more effectively trace explosives from
the manufacturer through the
distribution chain to the end purchaser.
This process is used as a tool in
criminal enforcement activities.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: An estimated 2,205
respondents will take 3 seconds to
respond.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The estimated annual public
burden associated with this collection is
956 hours.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3E–
405B, Washington, DC 20530.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: June 1, 2016.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2016–13349 Filed 6–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Modification to Consent Decree Under
the Clean Water Act
On June 1, 2016, the United States
Department of Justice filed, on behalf of
the Environmental Protection Agency, a
proposed Modification to the 2002
Consent Decree in United States and the
State of Maryland v. Mayor and the City
Council of Baltimore, Maryland, Civil
Action No. 1:02–CV–01524–JFM, with
the United States District Court for the
District of Maryland (‘‘proposed
Modified Consent Decree.’’)
On September 30, 2002, the Court
entered the 2002 Consent Decree
between the parties resolving Plaintiffs’
claims that the City of Baltimore
violated the Clean Water Act (the
‘‘CWA’’), 33 U.S.C. 1319(b) and (d),
resulting from Baltimore’s operation of
its sewer system and wastewater control
plant. Under the 2002 Consent Decree,
Baltimore was required to eliminate any
remaining combined sewers in the
collections system, eliminate structures
for sanitary sewer overflows (SSO),
conduct thorough evaluations of the
City’s eight sewersheds, propose
rehabilitation measures for each
sewershed and implement such
measures after approval. The 2002
Consent Decree provides for
implementation completion by January
2016.
Baltimore did not meet the January
2016 deadline for all of the
rehabilitation measures. This proposed
Modified Consent Decree allows
Baltimore more time to conduct the SSO
work using a two-phased approach.
Under the proposed Modified Consent
Decree, the Phase I work is required to
be completed by January 2021, and then
Baltimore is required to submit a Phase
II Plan for EPA approval by December
2022. The Phase II Plan must propose a
schedule for work to be completed no
later than December 2030. After the
Phase II work Baltimore will conduct
two years of post-implementation
monitoring. If after the Phase II work is
complete the Plaintiffs determine that
additional work is necessary, they can
require Baltimore to undertake
additional remedial measures.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 7, 2016 / Notices
proposed Modified Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, United States and State of
Maryland v. Mayor and the City Council
of Baltimore, Maryland, Civil Action
No. 1:02–CV–01524–JFM., D.J. Ref. No.
DJ # 90–5–1–1–4402/1. All comments
must be submitted no later than sixty
(60) days after the publication date of
this notice. Comments may be
submitted either by email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the proposed Modified Consent Decree
may be examined and downloaded at
this Justice Department Web site:
https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consentdecrees. We will provide a paper copy
of the proposed Modified Consent
Decree upon written request and
payment of reproduction costs. Please
mail your request and payment to:
Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $21.75 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Robert Brook,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2016–13330 Filed 6–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act, Clean Water Act, and Emergency
Planning and Community Right-ToKnow Act
On June 1, 2016, the Department of
Justice lodged a proposed consent
decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Rhode Island in
the lawsuit entitled United States v.
Newport Biodiesel, Inc., Civil Action
No. 1:16–cv–00242.
The United States filed this lawsuit
under the Clean Air Act, the Clean
Water Act, and the Emergency Planning
and Community Right-to-Know Act. The
United States’ complaint seeks
injunctive relief and civil penalties for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:13 Jun 06, 2016
Jkt 238001
alleged violations at Newport Biodiesel,
Inc.’s biodiesel manufacturing facility in
Newport, Rhode Island. Alleged
violations include Newport Biodiesel
Inc.’s failure to comply with regulations
that govern emissions of hazardous air
pollutants (specifically methanol);
failure to design and maintain a safe
facility and take steps to prevent
accidental releases; failure to prepare
and implement a spill prevention
control and countermeasure plan; and
failure to file chemical inventory forms.
The consent decree requires the
defendant to perform injunctive relief
and pay a $396,000 civil penalty.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
consent decree. Comments should be
addressed to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division, and should refer to
United States v. Newport Biodiesel, Inc.,
D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–11301. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington,
D.C. 20044–7611.
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the consent decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department Web site: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
consent decree upon written request
and payment of reproduction costs.
Please mail your request and payment
to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $8.00 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Robert E. Maher Jr.,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2016–13327 Filed 6–6–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
36585
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training
Administration
Notice of Determinations Regarding
Eligibility To Apply for Worker
Adjustment Assistance
In accordance with Section 223 of the
Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor
herein presents summaries of
determinations regarding eligibility to
apply for trade adjustment assistance for
workers by (TA–W) number issued
during the period of April 29, 2016
through May 20, 2016.
In order for an affirmative
determination to be made for workers of
a primary firm and a certification issued
regarding eligibility to apply for worker
adjustment assistance, each of the group
eligibility requirements of Section
222(a) of the Act must be met.
I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
separated, or are threatened to become
totally or partially separated;
(2) the sales or production, or both, of
such firm have decreased absolutely;
and
(3) One of the following must be
satisfied:
(A) Imports of articles or services like
or directly competitive with articles
produced or services supplied by such
firm have increased;
(B) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles into which one
or more component parts produced by
such firm are directly incorporated,
have increased;
(C) imports of articles directly
incorporating one or more component
parts produced outside the United
States that are like or directly
competitive with imports of articles
incorporating one or more component
parts produced by such firm have
increased;
(D) imports of articles like or directly
competitive with articles which are
produced directly using services
supplied by such firm, have increased;
and
(4) the increase in imports contributed
importantly to such workers’ separation
or threat of separation and to the decline
in the sales or production of such firm;
or
II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the
following must be satisfied:
(1) A significant number or proportion
of the workers in such workers’ firm
have become totally or partially
E:\FR\FM\07JNN1.SGM
07JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36584-36585]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13330]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Modification to Consent Decree
Under the Clean Water Act
On June 1, 2016, the United States Department of Justice filed, on
behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency, a proposed Modification
to the 2002 Consent Decree in United States and the State of Maryland
v. Mayor and the City Council of Baltimore, Maryland, Civil Action No.
1:02-CV-01524-JFM, with the United States District Court for the
District of Maryland (``proposed Modified Consent Decree.'')
On September 30, 2002, the Court entered the 2002 Consent Decree
between the parties resolving Plaintiffs' claims that the City of
Baltimore violated the Clean Water Act (the ``CWA''), 33 U.S.C. 1319(b)
and (d), resulting from Baltimore's operation of its sewer system and
wastewater control plant. Under the 2002 Consent Decree, Baltimore was
required to eliminate any remaining combined sewers in the collections
system, eliminate structures for sanitary sewer overflows (SSO),
conduct thorough evaluations of the City's eight sewersheds, propose
rehabilitation measures for each sewershed and implement such measures
after approval. The 2002 Consent Decree provides for implementation
completion by January 2016.
Baltimore did not meet the January 2016 deadline for all of the
rehabilitation measures. This proposed Modified Consent Decree allows
Baltimore more time to conduct the SSO work using a two-phased
approach. Under the proposed Modified Consent Decree, the Phase I work
is required to be completed by January 2021, and then Baltimore is
required to submit a Phase II Plan for EPA approval by December 2022.
The Phase II Plan must propose a schedule for work to be completed no
later than December 2030. After the Phase II work Baltimore will
conduct two years of post-implementation monitoring. If after the Phase
II work is complete the Plaintiffs determine that additional work is
necessary, they can require Baltimore to undertake additional remedial
measures.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on
the
[[Page 36585]]
proposed Modified Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division,
United States and State of Maryland v. Mayor and the City Council of
Baltimore, Maryland, Civil Action No. 1:02-CV-01524-JFM., D.J. Ref. No.
DJ # 90-5-1-1-4402/1. All comments must be submitted no later than
sixty (60) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may
be submitted either by email or by mail:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To submit comments: Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................ pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.
By mail............................. Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the public comment period, the proposed Modified Consent
Decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web
site: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a
paper copy of the proposed Modified Consent Decree upon written request
and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and payment
to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington,
DC 20044-7611.
Please enclose a check or money order for $21.75 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury.
Robert Brook,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-13330 Filed 6-6-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
