South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, Phase 2; Don Edwards National Wildlife Refuge; Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report, 35790-35792 [2016-13100]
Download as PDF
35790
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Notices
The Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that
pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order
12148, as amended, Thomas J. McCool,
of FEMA is appointed to act as the
Federal Coordinating Officer for this
major disaster.
The following areas of the State of
Montana have been designated as
adversely affected by this major disaster:
Glacier, Liberty, Pondera, Teton, and Toole
Counties for Public Assistance.
All areas within the State of Montana are
eligible for assistance under the Hazard
Mitigation Grant Program.
The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households in Presidentially
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—
Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals
and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals
and Households—Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants—Public Assistance
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that
pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order
12148, as amended, William L. Vogel, of
FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.
This action terminates the
appointment of Michael L. Parker as
Federal Coordinating Officer for this
disaster.
The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA);
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant;
97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to
Individuals and Households in Presidentially
Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—
Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals
and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals
and Households—Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants—Public Assistance
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039,
Hazard Mitigation Grant.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal buildings
and real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the
purpose of announcing that no
additional properties have been
determined suitable or unsuitable this
week.
Dated: May 26, 2016.
Brian P. Fitzmaurice,
Director, Division of Community Assistance,
Office of Special Needs Assistance Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016–12861 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–R–2016–N076];
[FXRS282108E8PD0–167–F2013227943]
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration
Project, Phase 2; Don Edwards
National Wildlife Refuge; Final
Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; final
environmental impact statement and
environmental impact report.
[FR Doc. 2016–13178 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 9111–23–P
[Docket No. FR–5907–N–23]
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
To Assist the Homeless
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–4238–
DR; Docket ID FEMA–2016–0001]
Missouri; Amendment No. 2 to Notice
of a Major Disaster Declaration
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This notice amends the notice
of a major disaster declaration for State
of Missouri (FEMA–4238–DR), dated
August 7, 2015, and related
determinations.
DATES: Effective Date: May 13, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646–2833.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Federal Emergency Management Agency
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:20 Jun 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2016–13180 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am]
This Notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Juanita Perry, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC
20410; telephone (202) 402–3970; TTY
number for the hearing- and speechimpaired (202) 708–2565, (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information line
at 800–927–7588.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the December 12, 1988
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the
California State Coastal Conservancy,
announce that the Final Environmental
Impact Statement/Environmental
Impact Report (FEIS/EIR) for Phase 2 of
the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration
Project (SBSP) at the Don Edwards
National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) in
Alameda, Santa Clara, and San Mateo
Counties, California, is now available.
The FEIS/EIR, which we prepared and
now announce in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), describes the alternatives
analyzed for Phase 2 of the South Bay
Salt Pond Restoration Project, including
the preferred alternative.
ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You
may obtain copies of the document in
the following places:
Internet: https://
www.southbayrestoration.org/planning/
phase2/.
Libraries:
• San Francisco Bay National Wildlife
Refuge Complex Headquarters, 1
Marshlands Rd., Fremont, CA 94555.
• Alviso Branch Library, 5050 N. First
St., San Jose, CA 95002.
• Biblioteca Latino America, 921 S.
First St., San Jose, CA 95110.
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Notices
• California State University Library,
25800 Carlos Bee Blvd., Hayward, CA
94542.
• Fremont Main Library, 2400
Stevenson Blvd., Fremont, CA 94538.
• Menlo Park Library, 800 Alma St.,
Menlo Park, CA 94025.
• Mountain View Library, 585 Franklin
St., Mountain View, CA 94041.
• Rinconada Library, 1213 Newell Rd.,
Palo Alto, CA 94303.
• King Library, 150 E. San Fernando St.,
San Jose, CA 95112.
• Redwood City Main Library, 1044
Middlefield Rd., Redwood City, CA
94063.
• San Mateo County East Palo Alto
Library, 2415 University Ave., East
Palo Alto, CA 94303.
• Santa Clara County Milpitas Library,
160 N. Main St., Milpitas, CA 95035.
• Santa Clara Public Library, 2635
Homestead Rd., Santa Clara, CA
95051.
• Sunnyvale Public Library, 665 W.
Olive Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94086.
• Natural Resources Library, U.S.
Department of the Interior, 1849 C
Street NW., Washington, DC 20240–
0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Barr, Deputy Project Leader,
USFWS, 510–792–0222 (phone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Background
In December 2007, the USFWS and
the California Department of Fish and
Wildlife (CDFW) published a Final EIS/
EIR for the SBSP Restoration Project at
the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay
National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) and
the CDFW Eden Landing Ecological
Reserve (December 19, 2007; 72 FR
71937). The overall south bay salt pond
restoration area includes 15,100 acres,
which the USFWS and the CDFW
acquired from Cargill, Inc., in 2003. The
lands acquired from Cargill are divided
into three pond complexes: The
Ravenswood Pond Complex, in San
Mateo County, managed by the USFWS;
the Alviso Pond complex, also managed
by the USFWS, which is mostly in Santa
Clara County, with five ponds in
Alameda County; and the Eden Landing
Pond Complex, in Alameda County,
which is owned and managed by the
CDFW. The SBSP Restoration Project
presented in the Final EIS/EIR was both
programmatic, covering a 50-year
period, and project-level, addressing the
specific components and
implementation of Phase 1.
In January 2008, we signed a Record
of Decision selecting the Tidal Emphasis
Alternative (Alternative C) for
implementation. This alternative will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:20 Jun 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
result in 90 percent of the USFWS’s
ponds on the Refuge being restored to
tidal wetlands and 10 percent converted
to managed ponds. Under Phase 1 of
Alternative C, we restored ponds E8A,
E8X, E9, E12, and E13 at the Eden
Landing complex; A6, A8, A16, and A17
at the Alviso complex; and SF2 at the
Ravenswood complex. We also added
several trails, interpretive features, and
other recreational access points.
Construction was completed on the
USFWS ponds in 2013.
We now propose restoration or
enhancement of over 2,000 acres of
former salt ponds in the second phase
of the SBSP Restoration Project. In the
Phase 2 DEIS/EIR, we provided projectlevel analysis of proposed restoration or
enhancement of portions of the
following three geographically separate
pond clusters: The Ravenswood Pond
Complex (R3, R4, R5, and S5), the
Alviso Pond Complex—Mountain View
Ponds (A1 and A2W), the Alviso Pond
Complex—A8 Ponds (A8 and A8S), and
the Alviso Pond Complex—Island
Ponds (A19, A20, and A21). These pond
clusters are illustrated in Figures 1–5 on
the SBSP Restoration Project Web site at
https://www.southbayrestoration.org/
planning/phase2/.
Phase 2 of the SBSP Restoration
Project is intended to restore and
enhance tidal wetlands and managed
pond habitats in South San Francisco
Bay while providing for flood
management and wildlife-oriented
public access and recreation. In this
Phase 2 document, we would continue
habitat restoration activities in both
USFWS pond complexes, while also
providing recreation and public access
opportunities at two sets of ponds and
maintaining or improving current levels
of flood protection in the surrounding
communities.
The Draft EIS/EIR was available for a
60-day public review and comment
period, which we announced via several
methods, including public notices in
local newspapers and a notice in the
Federal Register (80 FR 44103; July 24,
2015). We held a public meeting to
solicit comments on the Draft EIS/EIR
on August 4, 2015. We identified and
analyzed a range of alternatives by pond
cluster alternatives in the Draft EIS/EIR.
Alternatives
We considered a range of alternatives
and their impacts in the DEIS/EIR,
including No Action Alternatives for
each group of ponds. The range of
alternatives included varying
approaches to restoring tidal marshes
(including number and location of
breaches and other levee modifications),
habitat enhancements (islands,
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35791
transition zones, and channels),
modifications to existing levees and
berms to maintain or improve flood
protection, and recreation and public
access components (including trails,
boardwalks, and viewing platforms)
which correspond to the project
objectives.
The alternatives for each group of
ponds, or pond cluster, are described
below. The No Action Alternatives are
described together, followed by the
Action Alternatives that were
considered for each pond cluster.
Alviso—Island Ponds, Alviso—
Mountain View Ponds, Alviso—A8
Ponds, and Ravenswood Ponds—
Alternatives A (No Action)
Under Alternatives Island A,
Mountain View A, A8 A, and
Ravenswood A (the No Action
Alternative at each of these pond
clusters), no new activities would be
implemented as part of Phase 2. The
pond clusters would continue to be
monitored and managed through the
activities described in the Adaptive
Management Plan (AMP) and in
accordance with current USFWS
practices.
Alviso—Island Ponds
Alternative Island B
Alternative Island B would breach
Pond A19’s northern levee and remove
or lower levees between Ponds A19 and
A20 to increase connectivity and
improve the ecological function of both
ponds.
Alternative Island C
Alternative Island C would include
the components of Alternative Island B
with the addition of levee breaches on
the north sides of Ponds A20 and A21,
lowering of portions of levees around
Pond A20, pilot channels in Pond A19,
and widening the existing breaches on
the southern levee of Pond A19.
Alviso—Mountain View Ponds
Alternative Mountain View B
Under Alternative Mountain View B,
Ponds A1 and A2W levees would be
breached at several points to introduce
tidal flow in the ponds. Portions of
Pond A1’s western levee would be built
up to maintain current levels of flood
protection provided by the pond itself.
Habitat transition zones and habitat
islands would be constructed in the
ponds to increase habitat complexity
and quality for special-status species. A
new trail and viewing platform would
be installed to improve recreation and
public access at these ponds.
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
35792
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 107 / Friday, June 3, 2016 / Notices
Alternative Mountain View C
Under Alternative Mountain View C,
levees would be breached and lowered
to increase tidal flows in Pond A1, Pond
A2W, and Charleston Slough. The
inclusion of Charleston Slough (by
breaching and lowering much of Pond
A1’s western levee) is the primary
distinguishing feature between
Alternative Mountain View B and
Alternative Mountain View C. Several
additional new trails and viewing
platforms would be installed or replaced
to improve recreation and public access
at the pond cluster. To continue
providing water to the City of Mountain
View’s Shoreline Park sailing lake, a
new water intake would be constructed
at the proposed breach between Pond
A1 and Charleston Slough.
Alviso—A8 Ponds
Alternative A8 B
Alternative A8 B proposes the
construction of habitat transition zones
in Pond A8S’s southwest corner,
southeast corner, or both, depending on
the amount of material available.
Ravenswood Ponds
Alternative Ravenswood B
Alternative Ravenswood B would
open Pond R4 to tidal flows, improve
levees to provide additional flood
protection, create habitat transition zone
along the western edge of Pond R4,
establish managed ponds to improve
habitat for diving and dabbling birds,
increase pond connectivity, and add a
viewing platform to improve recreation
and public access.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Alternative Ravenswood C
Alternative Ravenswood C would be
similar to Alternative Ravenswood B,
with the following exceptions: Ponds R5
and S5 would be converted to a
particular type of managed pond that is
operated to maintain intertidal mudflat
elevation; water control structures
would be installed on Pond R3 to allow
for improvement to the habitat for
western snowy plover; an additional
habitat transition zone would be
constructed; and two public access and
recreational trails and additional
viewing platforms would be
constructed.
Alternative Ravenswood D
Alternative Ravenswood D would
open Pond R4 to tidal flows, improve
levees to provide additional flood
protection, create two habitat transition
zones in Pond R4, establish enhanced
managed ponds in Ponds R5 and S5,
increase pond connectivity, enhance
Pond R3 for western snowy plover
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:20 Jun 02, 2016
Jkt 238001
habitat, remove the levees within and
between Ponds R5 and S5, and improve
recreation and public access.
Alternative Ravenswood D would also
allow temporary stormwater detention
into Ponds R5 and S5 via connections
with the City of Redwood City’s
Bayfront Canal and Atherton Channel
Project. This would treat a residual
salinity problem in Ponds R5 and S5.
Following public review of the Draft
EIS/EIR, USFWS and the California
State Coastal Conservancy, in
coordination with the Project
Management Team and other project
partners, identified the preferred
alternative, which is based on
restoration enhancements at all four
pond clusters, as well as maintained or
increased flood protection and
additional public access and recreation
features at two of the Phase 2 pond
clusters.
Preferred Alternative: The preferred
alternative at each pond cluster is as
follows:
• At the Island Ponds it is Alternative
Island B, with one restoration
component of Alternative Island C
included, which is to widen only the
westernmost of the two existing
breaches on the south side of Pond A19.
• At the Mountain View Ponds it is
essentially Alternative Mountain View
B, with the substitution of one habitat
enhancement (do not include
Charleston Slough in tidal marsh
restoration but do construct a habitat
transition zone across the entire
southern extent of Pond A1, but only
across central portion of A2W) and the
addition of one public access
component drawn from Mountain View
C (add recreational trail on eastern levee
of Pond A2W to the northeast corner of
Pond A2W). There is also a modification
of one of the flood protection features
presented in the two action alternatives
(raise the Coast Casey Forebay levee
along southern border of Charleston
Slough and maintain necessary access to
existing utilities adjacent to that levee).
• At the A8 Ponds it is Alternative A8
B, except that the top elevation of the
proposed transition zones has been
increased to provide greater erosion
protection.
• At the Ravenswood Ponds it is
similar to Alternative Ravenswood B, in
its restoration goals and features for
Ponds R3, R4, R5, and S5, but it also
includes an additional habitat transition
zone and a trail on the eastern edge of
Ponds R5 and S5, all of which were
included in Alternatives Ravenswood C
and D.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NEPA Compliance
We will make a decision no sooner
than 30 days after the publication of the
final EIS/EIR. We anticipate issuing a
Record of Decision in the summer of
2016.
We provide this notice under
regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) for implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act (40
CFR 1506.6).
Dated: May 20, 2016.
Ren Lohoefener,
Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2016–13100 Filed 6–2–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–IA–2016–0071;
FXIA16710900000–156–FF09A30000]
Endangered Species; Receipt of
Applications for Permit
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of receipt of applications
for permit.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, invite the public to
comment on the following applications
to conduct certain activities with
endangered species. With some
exceptions, the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) prohibits activities with listed
species unless Federal authorization is
acquired that allows such activities.
DATES: We must receive comments or
requests for documents on or before July
5, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submitting Comments: You
may submit comments by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments
on Docket No. FWS–HQ–IA–2016–0071.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery: Public
Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No.
FWS–HQ–IA–2016–0071; U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service Headquarters, MS:
BPHC; 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls
Church, VA 22041–3803.
When submitting comments, please
indicate the name of the applicant and
the PRT# you are commenting on. We
will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Comments section below for
more information). Viewing Comments:
Comments and materials we receive will
be available for public inspection on
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\03JNN1.SGM
03JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 107 (Friday, June 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35790-35792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-13100]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-R-2016-N076]; [FXRS282108E8PD0-167-F2013227943]
South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project, Phase 2; Don Edwards
National Wildlife Refuge; Final Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; final environmental impact statement
and environmental impact report.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the
California State Coastal Conservancy, announce that the Final
Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report (FEIS/EIR)
for Phase 2 of the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project (SBSP) at
the Don Edwards National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) in Alameda, Santa
Clara, and San Mateo Counties, California, is now available. The FEIS/
EIR, which we prepared and now announce in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), describes the alternatives
analyzed for Phase 2 of the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project,
including the preferred alternative.
ADDRESSES: Document Availability: You may obtain copies of the document
in the following places:
Internet: https://www.southbayrestoration.org/planning/phase2/.
Libraries:
San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge Complex
Headquarters, 1 Marshlands Rd., Fremont, CA 94555.
Alviso Branch Library, 5050 N. First St., San Jose, CA 95002.
Biblioteca Latino America, 921 S. First St., San Jose, CA
95110.
[[Page 35791]]
California State University Library, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd.,
Hayward, CA 94542.
Fremont Main Library, 2400 Stevenson Blvd., Fremont, CA 94538.
Menlo Park Library, 800 Alma St., Menlo Park, CA 94025.
Mountain View Library, 585 Franklin St., Mountain View, CA
94041.
Rinconada Library, 1213 Newell Rd., Palo Alto, CA 94303.
King Library, 150 E. San Fernando St., San Jose, CA 95112.
Redwood City Main Library, 1044 Middlefield Rd., Redwood City,
CA 94063.
San Mateo County East Palo Alto Library, 2415 University Ave.,
East Palo Alto, CA 94303.
Santa Clara County Milpitas Library, 160 N. Main St.,
Milpitas, CA 95035.
Santa Clara Public Library, 2635 Homestead Rd., Santa Clara,
CA 95051.
Sunnyvale Public Library, 665 W. Olive Ave., Sunnyvale, CA
94086.
Natural Resources Library, U.S. Department of the Interior,
1849 C Street NW., Washington, DC 20240-0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Barr, Deputy Project Leader,
USFWS, 510-792-0222 (phone).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In December 2007, the USFWS and the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife (CDFW) published a Final EIS/EIR for the SBSP Restoration
Project at the Don Edwards San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge
(Refuge) and the CDFW Eden Landing Ecological Reserve (December 19,
2007; 72 FR 71937). The overall south bay salt pond restoration area
includes 15,100 acres, which the USFWS and the CDFW acquired from
Cargill, Inc., in 2003. The lands acquired from Cargill are divided
into three pond complexes: The Ravenswood Pond Complex, in San Mateo
County, managed by the USFWS; the Alviso Pond complex, also managed by
the USFWS, which is mostly in Santa Clara County, with five ponds in
Alameda County; and the Eden Landing Pond Complex, in Alameda County,
which is owned and managed by the CDFW. The SBSP Restoration Project
presented in the Final EIS/EIR was both programmatic, covering a 50-
year period, and project-level, addressing the specific components and
implementation of Phase 1.
In January 2008, we signed a Record of Decision selecting the Tidal
Emphasis Alternative (Alternative C) for implementation. This
alternative will result in 90 percent of the USFWS's ponds on the
Refuge being restored to tidal wetlands and 10 percent converted to
managed ponds. Under Phase 1 of Alternative C, we restored ponds E8A,
E8X, E9, E12, and E13 at the Eden Landing complex; A6, A8, A16, and A17
at the Alviso complex; and SF2 at the Ravenswood complex. We also added
several trails, interpretive features, and other recreational access
points. Construction was completed on the USFWS ponds in 2013.
We now propose restoration or enhancement of over 2,000 acres of
former salt ponds in the second phase of the SBSP Restoration Project.
In the Phase 2 DEIS/EIR, we provided project-level analysis of proposed
restoration or enhancement of portions of the following three
geographically separate pond clusters: The Ravenswood Pond Complex (R3,
R4, R5, and S5), the Alviso Pond Complex--Mountain View Ponds (A1 and
A2W), the Alviso Pond Complex--A8 Ponds (A8 and A8S), and the Alviso
Pond Complex--Island Ponds (A19, A20, and A21). These pond clusters are
illustrated in Figures 1-5 on the SBSP Restoration Project Web site at
https://www.southbayrestoration.org/planning/phase2/.
Phase 2 of the SBSP Restoration Project is intended to restore and
enhance tidal wetlands and managed pond habitats in South San Francisco
Bay while providing for flood management and wildlife-oriented public
access and recreation. In this Phase 2 document, we would continue
habitat restoration activities in both USFWS pond complexes, while also
providing recreation and public access opportunities at two sets of
ponds and maintaining or improving current levels of flood protection
in the surrounding communities.
The Draft EIS/EIR was available for a 60-day public review and
comment period, which we announced via several methods, including
public notices in local newspapers and a notice in the Federal Register
(80 FR 44103; July 24, 2015). We held a public meeting to solicit
comments on the Draft EIS/EIR on August 4, 2015. We identified and
analyzed a range of alternatives by pond cluster alternatives in the
Draft EIS/EIR.
Alternatives
We considered a range of alternatives and their impacts in the
DEIS/EIR, including No Action Alternatives for each group of ponds. The
range of alternatives included varying approaches to restoring tidal
marshes (including number and location of breaches and other levee
modifications), habitat enhancements (islands, transition zones, and
channels), modifications to existing levees and berms to maintain or
improve flood protection, and recreation and public access components
(including trails, boardwalks, and viewing platforms) which correspond
to the project objectives.
The alternatives for each group of ponds, or pond cluster, are
described below. The No Action Alternatives are described together,
followed by the Action Alternatives that were considered for each pond
cluster.
Alviso--Island Ponds, Alviso--Mountain View Ponds, Alviso--A8 Ponds,
and Ravenswood Ponds--Alternatives A (No Action)
Under Alternatives Island A, Mountain View A, A8 A, and Ravenswood
A (the No Action Alternative at each of these pond clusters), no new
activities would be implemented as part of Phase 2. The pond clusters
would continue to be monitored and managed through the activities
described in the Adaptive Management Plan (AMP) and in accordance with
current USFWS practices.
Alviso--Island Ponds
Alternative Island B
Alternative Island B would breach Pond A19's northern levee and
remove or lower levees between Ponds A19 and A20 to increase
connectivity and improve the ecological function of both ponds.
Alternative Island C
Alternative Island C would include the components of Alternative
Island B with the addition of levee breaches on the north sides of
Ponds A20 and A21, lowering of portions of levees around Pond A20,
pilot channels in Pond A19, and widening the existing breaches on the
southern levee of Pond A19.
Alviso--Mountain View Ponds
Alternative Mountain View B
Under Alternative Mountain View B, Ponds A1 and A2W levees would be
breached at several points to introduce tidal flow in the ponds.
Portions of Pond A1's western levee would be built up to maintain
current levels of flood protection provided by the pond itself. Habitat
transition zones and habitat islands would be constructed in the ponds
to increase habitat complexity and quality for special-status species.
A new trail and viewing platform would be installed to improve
recreation and public access at these ponds.
[[Page 35792]]
Alternative Mountain View C
Under Alternative Mountain View C, levees would be breached and
lowered to increase tidal flows in Pond A1, Pond A2W, and Charleston
Slough. The inclusion of Charleston Slough (by breaching and lowering
much of Pond A1's western levee) is the primary distinguishing feature
between Alternative Mountain View B and Alternative Mountain View C.
Several additional new trails and viewing platforms would be installed
or replaced to improve recreation and public access at the pond
cluster. To continue providing water to the City of Mountain View's
Shoreline Park sailing lake, a new water intake would be constructed at
the proposed breach between Pond A1 and Charleston Slough.
Alviso--A8 Ponds
Alternative A8 B
Alternative A8 B proposes the construction of habitat transition
zones in Pond A8S's southwest corner, southeast corner, or both,
depending on the amount of material available.
Ravenswood Ponds
Alternative Ravenswood B
Alternative Ravenswood B would open Pond R4 to tidal flows, improve
levees to provide additional flood protection, create habitat
transition zone along the western edge of Pond R4, establish managed
ponds to improve habitat for diving and dabbling birds, increase pond
connectivity, and add a viewing platform to improve recreation and
public access.
Alternative Ravenswood C
Alternative Ravenswood C would be similar to Alternative Ravenswood
B, with the following exceptions: Ponds R5 and S5 would be converted to
a particular type of managed pond that is operated to maintain
intertidal mudflat elevation; water control structures would be
installed on Pond R3 to allow for improvement to the habitat for
western snowy plover; an additional habitat transition zone would be
constructed; and two public access and recreational trails and
additional viewing platforms would be constructed.
Alternative Ravenswood D
Alternative Ravenswood D would open Pond R4 to tidal flows, improve
levees to provide additional flood protection, create two habitat
transition zones in Pond R4, establish enhanced managed ponds in Ponds
R5 and S5, increase pond connectivity, enhance Pond R3 for western
snowy plover habitat, remove the levees within and between Ponds R5 and
S5, and improve recreation and public access. Alternative Ravenswood D
would also allow temporary stormwater detention into Ponds R5 and S5
via connections with the City of Redwood City's Bayfront Canal and
Atherton Channel Project. This would treat a residual salinity problem
in Ponds R5 and S5.
Following public review of the Draft EIS/EIR, USFWS and the
California State Coastal Conservancy, in coordination with the Project
Management Team and other project partners, identified the preferred
alternative, which is based on restoration enhancements at all four
pond clusters, as well as maintained or increased flood protection and
additional public access and recreation features at two of the Phase 2
pond clusters.
Preferred Alternative: The preferred alternative at each pond
cluster is as follows:
At the Island Ponds it is Alternative Island B, with one
restoration component of Alternative Island C included, which is to
widen only the westernmost of the two existing breaches on the south
side of Pond A19.
At the Mountain View Ponds it is essentially Alternative
Mountain View B, with the substitution of one habitat enhancement (do
not include Charleston Slough in tidal marsh restoration but do
construct a habitat transition zone across the entire southern extent
of Pond A1, but only across central portion of A2W) and the addition of
one public access component drawn from Mountain View C (add
recreational trail on eastern levee of Pond A2W to the northeast corner
of Pond A2W). There is also a modification of one of the flood
protection features presented in the two action alternatives (raise the
Coast Casey Forebay levee along southern border of Charleston Slough
and maintain necessary access to existing utilities adjacent to that
levee).
At the A8 Ponds it is Alternative A8 B, except that the
top elevation of the proposed transition zones has been increased to
provide greater erosion protection.
At the Ravenswood Ponds it is similar to Alternative
Ravenswood B, in its restoration goals and features for Ponds R3, R4,
R5, and S5, but it also includes an additional habitat transition zone
and a trail on the eastern edge of Ponds R5 and S5, all of which were
included in Alternatives Ravenswood C and D.
NEPA Compliance
We will make a decision no sooner than 30 days after the
publication of the final EIS/EIR. We anticipate issuing a Record of
Decision in the summer of 2016.
We provide this notice under regulations in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) for implementing the National Environmental Policy
Act (40 CFR 1506.6).
Dated: May 20, 2016.
Ren Lohoefener,
Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2016-13100 Filed 6-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P