Airworthiness Directives; RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH Airplanes, 34927-34929 [2016-12609]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–6983; Directorate
Identifier 2016–CE–012–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; RUAG
Aerospace Services GmbH Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for RUAG
Aerospace Services GmbH Models 228–
100, 228–101, 228–200, 228–201, 228–
202, and 228–212 airplanes that would
supersede AD 2009–13–04. This
proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify
and correct an unsafe condition on an
aviation product. The MCAI describes
the unsafe condition as excessive wear
on the guide pin of the power lever or
condition lever which could cause
functional loss of the flight idle stop.
We are issuing this proposed AD to
require actions to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact RUAG
Aerospace Services GmbH, Dornier 228
Customer Support, P.O. Box 1253,
82231 Wessling, Federal Republic of
Germany, telephone: +49 (0) 8153–30–
2280; fax: +49 (0) 8153–30–3030; email:
custsupport.dorner228@ruag.com;
Internet: https://www.ruag.com/. You
may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Small
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329–
4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
6983; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone (800) 647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl
Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust,
Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4123; fax: (816)
329–4090; email: karl.schletzbaum@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2016–6983; Directorate Identifier
2016–CE–012–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. We will also
post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On June 10, 2009, we issued AD
2009–13–04, Amendment 39–15943 (74
FR 29116; June 19, 2009) (‘‘AD 2009–
13–04’’). AD 2009–13–04 required
actions intended to address an unsafe
condition on RUAG Aerospace Services
GmbH Models 228–100, 228–101, 228–
200, 228–201, 228–202, and 228–212
airplanes and was based on mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34927
Since we issued AD 2009–13–04,
further analysis has determined that the
inspection interval in cases of no pin
replacement can be extended.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD No.:
2009–0031R1, dated March 29, 2016
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:
Excessive wear on a guide pin of a power
lever was detected during inspections. The
failure of a power lever or condition lever
guide pin could cause functional loss of the
flight idle stop. This condition, if not
corrected, could lead to inadvertent
activation of the beta mode in flight, possibly
resulting in loss of control of the aeroplane.
Prompted by this finding, RUAG issued
Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) ASB–228–279 to
provide inspection instructions.
Consequently, EASA issued AD 2009–0031
to require repetitive detailed inspections of
the guide pins of the power levers and
condition levers, and replacement of any pin
that exceeds the allowable wear-limits.
Since that AD was issued, further analysis
has determined that the inspection interval,
in case of no pin replacement, can be
extended and RUAG published Revision 1 of
ASB–228–279, which also included landings
(expressed in this AD as flight cycles—FC) as
a determining factor.
For the reason described above, this AD
revises EASA AD 2009–0031, amending the
compliance times without changing the
technical requirements, and also introducing
some editorial changes for standardization.
You may examine the MCAI on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2016–6983.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH has
issued Dornier 228 Alert Service
Bulletin No. ASB–228–279, revision 1,
dated September 22, 2015. The service
information describes procedures for
repetitive inspections of the guide pins
of the power and condition levers and
replacement of those pins if necessary.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section of
this NPRM.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, they have notified us
of the unsafe condition described in the
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
34928
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all
information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
will affect 18 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it would take
about 20 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $10 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of the proposed AD on U.S.
operators to be $30,780, or $1,710 per
product.
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing Amendment 39–15943 (74 FR
29116; June 19, 2009), and adding the
following new AD:
■
RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH: Docket
No. FAA–2016–6983; Directorate
Identifier 2016–CE–012–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 18,
2016.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces 2009–13–04, Amendment
39–15943 (74 FR 29116; June 19, 2009) (‘‘AD
2009–13–04’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to RUAG Aerospace
Services GmbH Models 228–100, 228–101,
228–200, 228–201, 228–202, and 228–212
airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in
any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 76: Engine Controls.
(e) Reason
This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as excessive
wear on the guide pin of the power lever or
condition lever which could cause functional
loss of the flight idle stop. The total loss of
the pin could cause loss of the flight idle stop
and lead to inadvertent activation of the beta
mode in flight, resulting in possible loss of
control. We are issuing this proposed AD to
amend the compliance times of the guide pin
inspections.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, do the following
actions in paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(4) of
this AD based on a compliance time of hours
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
time-in-service (TIS) or flight cycles,
whichever occurs first:
(1) For throttle box assemblies with less
than 9,600 hours TIS or 9,600 flight cycles
since installed: Inspect the guide pins of the
power and condition levers for excessive
wear following the Accomplishment
Instructions in paragraph 2 of Dornier 228
Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB–228–279,
revision 1, dated September 22, 2015, at the
following times:
(i) Initially unless already done within the
last 1,200 hours TIS or 1,200 flight cycles as
of July 24, 2009 (the effective date retained
from AD 2009–13–04), upon accumulating
9,600 hours TIS or 9,600 flight cycles, or
within the next 100 hours TIS or 100 flight
cycles after July 24, 2009 (the effective date
retained from AD 2009–13–04), whichever
occurs later, inspect the guide pins of the
power and condition levers for excessive
wear; and
(ii) Repetitively thereafter within 4,800
hours TIS or 4,800 flight cycles since any
previous inspection in which the power and
condition levers guide pins were not
replaced or within 9,600 hours TIS or 9,600
flight cycles, whichever occurs first since the
previous inspection in which the power and
condition levers guide pins were replaced.
(2) For throttle box assemblies with 9,600
hours TIS or 9,600 flight cycles or more but
less than 13,200 hours TIS or 13,200 flight
cycles since installed: Inspect the guide pins
of the power and condition levers for
excessive wear within the next 1,200 hours
TIS or 1,200 flight cycles after July 24, 2009
(the effective date retained from AD 2009–
13–04) following the Accomplishment
Instructions in paragraph 2 of Dornier 228
Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB–228–279,
revision 1, dated September 22, 2015; and
(i) Repetitively inspect the guide pins of
the power and condition levers for excessive
wear thereafter within 4,800 hours TIS or
4,800 flight cycles since any previous
inspection in which the power and condition
levers guide pins were not replaced; or
(ii) Repetitively inspect the guide pins of
the power and condition levers for excessive
wear within 9,600 hours TIS or 9,600 flight
cycles, whichever occurs first, since the
previous inspection in which the power and
condition levers guide pins were replaced.
(3) For throttle box assemblies with 13,200
hours TIS or 13,200 flight cycles or more
since installed: Within 100 hours TIS or
flight cycles after July 24, 2009 (the effective
date retained from AD 2009–13–04) inspect
the guide pins of the power and condition
levers for excessive wear following the
Accomplishment Instructions in paragraph 2
of Dornier 228 Alert Service Bulletin No.
ASB–228–279, revision 1, dated September
22, 2015, at the following times:
(i) Initially within the next 100 hours TIS
or 100 flight cycles after July 24, 2009 (the
effective date retained from AD 2009–13–04);
and
(ii) Repetitively thereafter within 4,800
hours TIS or 4,800 flight cycles since any
previous inspection in which the power and
condition levers guide pins were not
replaced or within 9,600 hours TIS or 9,600
flight cycles since the previous inspection in
which the power and condition levers guide
pins were replaced.
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(4) For all throttle box assemblies: Before
further flight after any inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1), (f)(2), or (f)(3) of this AD,
replace any guide pin that exceeds the
acceptable wear-limits as defined in
paragraph 4.1 of Dornier 228 Alert Service
Bulletin No. ASB–228–279, revision 1, dated
September 22, 2015.
Note 1 to paragraph (f)(1), (f)(2) and (f)(3)
of this AD: If the flight cycles or hours TIS
of the throttle box assembly is unknown, use
the hours TIS of the airplane to determine the
compliance time for the inspection.
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to
ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace
Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone: (816) 329–4123; fax: (816)
329–4090; email: karl.schletzbaum@faa.gov.
Before using any approved AMOC on any
airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify
your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in
the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, a federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately 5 minutes per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
(h) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD No.: 2009–0031R1, dated
March 29, 2016, for related information. You
may examine the MCAI on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–6983.
For service information related to this AD,
contact RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH,
Dornier 228 Customer Support, P.O. Box
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
1253, 82231 Wessling, Federal Republic of
Germany, telephone: +49 (0) 8153–30–2280;
fax: +49 (0) 8153–30–3030; email:
custsupport.dorner228@ruag.com; Internet:
https://www.ruag.com/. You may review
copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May
20, 2016.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–12609 Filed 5–31–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2016–6895; Directorate
Identifier 2015–NM–068–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Fokker
Services B.V. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Fokker Services B.V. Model F.28
airplanes. This proposed AD prompted
by reports indicating that the main
landing gear (MLG) could not be
extended and locked down during
approach. This proposed AD would
require a detailed inspection of the
restrictor check valve filter screens to
detect any degraded or failed filter
screens, and installation of serviceable
parts. We are proposing this AD to
detect and correct any degraded or
failed filter screens. This condition, if
not corrected, could prevent MLG
extension and lock-down and result in
an emergency landing with consequent
injury to occupants and damage to the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34929
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Fokker Services
B.V., Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box
1357, 2130 EL Hoofddorp, the
Netherlands; telephone +31 (0)88–6280–
350; fax +31 (0)88–6280–111; email
technicalservices@fokker.com; Internet
https://www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may
view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2016–
6895; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom
Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1137;
fax 425–227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2016–6895; Directorate Identifier
2015–NM–068–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34927-34929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12609]
[[Page 34927]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2016-6983; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-012-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH Models 228-100, 228-101, 228-200, 228-201,
228-202, and 228-212 airplanes that would supersede AD 2009-13-04. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as excessive wear on the guide pin
of the power lever or condition lever which could cause functional loss
of the flight idle stop. We are issuing this proposed AD to require
actions to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH, Dornier 228 Customer Support, P.O. Box
1253, 82231 Wessling, Federal Republic of Germany, telephone: +49 (0)
8153-30-2280; fax: +49 (0) 8153-30-3030; email:
custsupport.dorner228@ruag.com; Internet: https://www.ruag.com/. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816)
329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
6983; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4123; fax: (816) 329-4090; email:
karl.schletzbaum@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-6983;
Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-012-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
On June 10, 2009, we issued AD 2009-13-04, Amendment 39-15943 (74
FR 29116; June 19, 2009) (``AD 2009-13-04''). AD 2009-13-04 required
actions intended to address an unsafe condition on RUAG Aerospace
Services GmbH Models 228-100, 228-101, 228-200, 228-201, 228-202, and
228-212 airplanes and was based on mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country.
Since we issued AD 2009-13-04, further analysis has determined that
the inspection interval in cases of no pin replacement can be extended.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD No.: 2009-0031R1, dated March 29, 2016 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:
Excessive wear on a guide pin of a power lever was detected
during inspections. The failure of a power lever or condition lever
guide pin could cause functional loss of the flight idle stop. This
condition, if not corrected, could lead to inadvertent activation of
the beta mode in flight, possibly resulting in loss of control of
the aeroplane.
Prompted by this finding, RUAG issued Alert Service Bulletin
(ASB) ASB-228-279 to provide inspection instructions. Consequently,
EASA issued AD 2009-0031 to require repetitive detailed inspections
of the guide pins of the power levers and condition levers, and
replacement of any pin that exceeds the allowable wear-limits.
Since that AD was issued, further analysis has determined that
the inspection interval, in case of no pin replacement, can be
extended and RUAG published Revision 1 of ASB-228-279, which also
included landings (expressed in this AD as flight cycles--FC) as a
determining factor.
For the reason described above, this AD revises EASA AD 2009-
0031, amending the compliance times without changing the technical
requirements, and also introducing some editorial changes for
standardization.
You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-6983.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH has issued Dornier 228 Alert Service
Bulletin No. ASB-228-279, revision 1, dated September 22, 2015. The
service information describes procedures for repetitive inspections of
the guide pins of the power and condition levers and replacement of
those pins if necessary. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the
[[Page 34928]]
MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD
because we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 18 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 20 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $10 per product.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $30,780, or $1,710 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15943 (74 FR
29116; June 19, 2009), and adding the following new AD:
RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2016-6983; Directorate
Identifier 2016-CE-012-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by July 18, 2016.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces 2009-13-04, Amendment 39-15943 (74 FR 29116;
June 19, 2009) (``AD 2009-13-04'').
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH Models 228-100,
228-101, 228-200, 228-201, 228-202, and 228-212 airplanes, all
serial numbers, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 76: Engine
Controls.
(e) Reason
This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as excessive wear
on the guide pin of the power lever or condition lever which could
cause functional loss of the flight idle stop. The total loss of the
pin could cause loss of the flight idle stop and lead to inadvertent
activation of the beta mode in flight, resulting in possible loss of
control. We are issuing this proposed AD to amend the compliance
times of the guide pin inspections.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, do the following actions in paragraphs
(f)(1) through (f)(4) of this AD based on a compliance time of hours
time-in-service (TIS) or flight cycles, whichever occurs first:
(1) For throttle box assemblies with less than 9,600 hours TIS
or 9,600 flight cycles since installed: Inspect the guide pins of
the power and condition levers for excessive wear following the
Accomplishment Instructions in paragraph 2 of Dornier 228 Alert
Service Bulletin No. ASB-228-279, revision 1, dated September 22,
2015, at the following times:
(i) Initially unless already done within the last 1,200 hours
TIS or 1,200 flight cycles as of July 24, 2009 (the effective date
retained from AD 2009-13-04), upon accumulating 9,600 hours TIS or
9,600 flight cycles, or within the next 100 hours TIS or 100 flight
cycles after July 24, 2009 (the effective date retained from AD
2009-13-04), whichever occurs later, inspect the guide pins of the
power and condition levers for excessive wear; and
(ii) Repetitively thereafter within 4,800 hours TIS or 4,800
flight cycles since any previous inspection in which the power and
condition levers guide pins were not replaced or within 9,600 hours
TIS or 9,600 flight cycles, whichever occurs first since the
previous inspection in which the power and condition levers guide
pins were replaced.
(2) For throttle box assemblies with 9,600 hours TIS or 9,600
flight cycles or more but less than 13,200 hours TIS or 13,200
flight cycles since installed: Inspect the guide pins of the power
and condition levers for excessive wear within the next 1,200 hours
TIS or 1,200 flight cycles after July 24, 2009 (the effective date
retained from AD 2009-13-04) following the Accomplishment
Instructions in paragraph 2 of Dornier 228 Alert Service Bulletin
No. ASB-228-279, revision 1, dated September 22, 2015; and
(i) Repetitively inspect the guide pins of the power and
condition levers for excessive wear thereafter within 4,800 hours
TIS or 4,800 flight cycles since any previous inspection in which
the power and condition levers guide pins were not replaced; or
(ii) Repetitively inspect the guide pins of the power and
condition levers for excessive wear within 9,600 hours TIS or 9,600
flight cycles, whichever occurs first, since the previous inspection
in which the power and condition levers guide pins were replaced.
(3) For throttle box assemblies with 13,200 hours TIS or 13,200
flight cycles or more since installed: Within 100 hours TIS or
flight cycles after July 24, 2009 (the effective date retained from
AD 2009-13-04) inspect the guide pins of the power and condition
levers for excessive wear following the Accomplishment Instructions
in paragraph 2 of Dornier 228 Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB-228-
279, revision 1, dated September 22, 2015, at the following times:
(i) Initially within the next 100 hours TIS or 100 flight cycles
after July 24, 2009 (the effective date retained from AD 2009-13-
04); and
(ii) Repetitively thereafter within 4,800 hours TIS or 4,800
flight cycles since any previous inspection in which the power and
condition levers guide pins were not replaced or within 9,600 hours
TIS or 9,600 flight cycles since the previous inspection in which
the power and condition levers guide pins were replaced.
[[Page 34929]]
(4) For all throttle box assemblies: Before further flight after
any inspection required in paragraph (f)(1), (f)(2), or (f)(3) of
this AD, replace any guide pin that exceeds the acceptable wear-
limits as defined in paragraph 4.1 of Dornier 228 Alert Service
Bulletin No. ASB-228-279, revision 1, dated September 22, 2015.
Note 1 to paragraph (f)(1), (f)(2) and (f)(3) of this AD: If the
flight cycles or hours TIS of the throttle box assembly is unknown,
use the hours TIS of the airplane to determine the compliance time
for the inspection.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4123; fax: (816) 329-4090;
email: karl.schletzbaum@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
(h) Related Information
Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2009-0031R1, dated March 29, 2016, for related information. You may
examine the MCAI on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-6983. For service
information related to this AD, contact RUAG Aerospace Services
GmbH, Dornier 228 Customer Support, P.O. Box 1253, 82231 Wessling,
Federal Republic of Germany, telephone: +49 (0) 8153-30-2280; fax:
+49 (0) 8153-30-3030; email: custsupport.dorner228@ruag.com;
Internet: https://www.ruag.com/. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 20, 2016.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-12609 Filed 5-31-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P