Updates to Rulemaking and Waiver Procedures and Expansion of the Equivalent Level of Safety Option, 34919-34926 [2016-12129]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day
of May, 2016.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Annette L. Vietti-Cook,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2016–12926 Filed 5–31–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 11, 404, 405, 420, 431,
435, 437, 460
[Docket No.: FAA–2016–6761; Notice No.
16–03]
RIN 2120–AK76
Updates to Rulemaking and Waiver
Procedures and Expansion of the
Equivalent Level of Safety Option
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action would streamline
and improve commercial space
transportation regulations’ general
rulemaking and petition procedures by
reflecting current practice; reorganizing
the regulations for clarity and flow; and
allowing petitioners to file their
petitions to the FAA’s Office of
Commercial Space Transportation
electronically. Further, it would expand
the option to satisfy commercial space
transportation requirements by
demonstrating an equivalent level of
safety. These changes are necessary to
ensure the regulations are current,
accurate, and are not unnecessarily
burdensome. The intended effect of
these changes is to improve the clarity
of the regulations and reduce burden on
the industry and on the FAA.
DATES: Send comments on or before
August 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by docket number FAA–2016–6761
using any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30; U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
• Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(c), DOT solicits comments from the
public to better inform its rulemaking
process. DOT posts these comments,
without edit, including any personal
information the commenter provides, to
www.regulations.gov, as described in
the system of records notice (DOT/ALL–
14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
questions concerning this proposed
rule, contact Shirley McBride, AST–300,
Office of Commercial Space
Transportation, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267–7470; email
Shirley.McBride@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The Commercial Space Launch Act of
1984, as amended and re-codified at 51
U.S.C. 50901–50923 (the Act),
authorizes the Department of
Transportation and thus the FAA,
through delegations, to oversee, license,
and regulate commercial launch and
reentry activities, and the operation of
launch and reentry sites as carried out
by U.S. citizens or within the United
States. 51 U.S.C. 50904, 50905. The Act
directs the FAA to exercise this
responsibility consistent with public
health and safety, safety of property,
and the national security and foreign
policy interests of the United States. 51
U.S.C. 50905. The Act directs the FAA
to regulate only to the extent necessary
to protect the public health and safety,
safety of property, and national security
and foreign policy interests of the
United States. 51 U.S.C. 50901(a)(7).
The FAA is also responsible for
encouraging, facilitating, and promoting
commercial space launches by the
private sector. 51 U.S.C. 50903.
I. Background
The Office of Commercial Space
Transportation (AST) was established
under the Act as part of the Office of the
Secretary of Transportation within the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34919
Department of Transportation. In 1988,
the general rulemaking and petition
procedures, under the authority of the
Act, were codified in 14 CFR, chapter
III, part 404.
In November 1995, AST was
transferred to the FAA as the agency’s
only space-related line of business. The
FAA’s general rulemaking and petition
procedures, for which the agency
follows public rulemaking procedures
under the Administrative Procedure
Act, 5 U.S.C. 553, reside in 14 CFR
chapter I, part 11. When AST became
part of the FAA, the general rulemaking
and petition procedures in part 404
were not conformed to those in part 11
to remove duplicate and outdated
information, or to clarify those
provisions that apply specifically to the
FAA’s commercial space transportation
regulations. The proposed rule would
update parts 404 and 11 to remove
duplicate information from part 404 and
add appropriate cross references
between part 11 and part 404. In
addition, the proposal would update
part 404 to reflect current practice,
clarify the requirements, and add an
option to submit petitions to AST
electronically.
Currently, the option to satisfy a
commercial space transportation
regulation by demonstrating an
‘‘equivalent level of safety’’ is limited to
part 417 1 and to some specific sections
of chapter III. This restricts the FAA’s
flexibility in approving launch and
reentry related activities where the
operator can convincingly demonstrate
that an alternative approach to the
requirements of chapter III provides an
equivalent level of safety. This proposal
would expand the equivalent level of
safety option so that it applies more
broadly to chapter III requirements for
both launch and reentry activities.
The current title of part 405 is
‘‘Investigations and Enforcement.’’
However, part 405 does not relate to
investigations. To avoid confusion, the
FAA proposes to revise the title of part
405 to a title more descriptive of its
contents, namely, ‘‘Compliance and
Enforcement.’’
II. Discussion of the Proposal
1. General Rulemaking Procedures
(Part 11)
The general rulemaking and petition
procedures for commercial space
transportation regulations, 14 CFR
1 See § 417.1(g): Equivalent level of safety. The
requirements of this part apply to a launch operator
and the launch operator’s launch unless the launch
operator clearly and convincingly demonstrates that
an alternative approach provides an equivalent
level of safety.
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
34920
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
chapter III, part 404, are not aligned
with the FAA’s general rulemaking and
petition procedures located in 14 CFR
chapter I, part 11. This has caused some
confusion about how the two parts
relate to each other and what
requirements apply specifically to
commercial space transportation
regulations. Additionally, there is no
option to file petitions electronically
under chapter III.
The FAA proposes minor changes to
part 11 to clarify that this part applies
to all FAA regulations, including
commercial space transportation
regulations, except as otherwise noted.
Also, the FAA proposes to correct an
outdated Internet link in part 11.
§ 11.27—Are there other ways FAA
collects specific rulemaking
recommendations before we issue an
NPRM?
§ 11.15—What is a petition for
exemption?
§ 11.63—How and to whom do I submit
my petition for rulemaking or petition
for exemption?
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The FAA proposes to amend § 11.15
to cross reference part 404 for
commercial space transportation
waivers. Authority for the FAA’s
aviation safety oversight falls under
Title 49 U.S.C., while the agency’s
authority for commercial space
transportation oversight falls under 51
U.S.C. 50901–50923. Title 49 allows for
‘‘exemptions’’ as requests for relief from
a regulatory requirement, whereas Title
51 allows the Secretary to ‘‘waive’’
regulatory requirements. To retain the
distinction of terms under both statutes,
the FAA proposes to revise § 11.15 to
cross reference part 404, which
describes the agency’s delegated
authority to issue commercial space
transportation waivers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
The FAA proposes to add the
Commercial Space Transportation
Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) as an
example of an advisory committee the
FAA uses to review and provide advice
on various issues. While the FAA uses
the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee (ARAC) for aviation-specific
issues, it uses COMSTAC for
commercial space transportation issues.
ARAC is comprised of representatives
from the aviation industry. COMSTAC
includes representatives from the
commercial space industry.
The proposal would amend this
section to remove an outdated Internet
address in § 11.63(a)(1), ‘‘https://
www.faa.gov/regulations,’’ where
petitioners are directed to find
additional instructions on filing their
petitions, and replace it with a
description of where it could be found.
This is because an Internet address may
be subject to change, and a description
would be more flexible while still
providing adequate instruction.
2. Petitions for Waiver and Rulemaking
(Part 404)
Currently, part 404, subpart A is
organized such that requirements for
filing and processing a petition for
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
waiver and a petition for rulemaking are
combined in the same sections, §§ 404.3
and 404.5. This causes confusion
because while some requirements apply
to both petition for waiver and petition
for rulemaking, certain others apply
only to one or to the other. Having
requirements for both types of petitions
in the same sections make it difficult to
determine which requirement applies to
which type of petition. The agency
proposes to establish separate sections
for requirements applicable to both
petitions for waiver and petitions for
rulemaking (proposed §§ 404.1 and
404.3), requirements applicable only to
petitions for waiver (proposed §§ 404.5
and 404.7), and those applicable only to
petitions for rulemaking (proposed
§§ 404.9 and 404.11).
Current subpart B of part 404 includes
general rulemaking procedures that
duplicate those in chapter I, part 11.
The FAA proposes to reorganize subpart
B to remove the duplicate information
and add relevant cross references to part
11.
The FAA also proposes to remove the
subpart titles in part 404 because the
other organizational changes to part 404
would remove the need to use subpart
titles as guides.
Additionally, and as indicated in the
‘‘Proposed Reorganization—Part 404’’
table below, in order to accommodate
the reorganization of part 404, the
current part title, some section titles,
and some section numbers would
change. Also, new sections would be
added.
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Proposed § 404.1—Scope
The FAA proposes to revise § 404.1 to
clarify the scope of part 404. Currently
§ 404.1 states that part 404 ‘‘establishes
procedures for issuing regulations to
implement 51 U.S.C. Subtitle V, chapter
509, and for eliminating or waiving
requirements for licensing or permitting
of commercial space transportation
activities under that statute.’’ The FAA
would revise § 404.1 to state that part
404 establishes procedures for issuing
regulations and for filing a petition for
waiver or a petition for rulemaking to
the Associate Administrator for
Commercial Space Transportation.
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed § 404.3—General
The FAA proposes to change the title
of this section from ‘‘Filing of petitions
to the Associate Administrator’’ to
‘‘General’’ to reflect the reorganization
of the part.
The reorganized section would
include information applicable to both
petitions for waiver and petitions for
rulemaking. This information would
include the physical address to which
petitioners should send their petitions,
as well as the option to file petitions to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
AST electronically by using the
specified FAA email address.
Current § 404.3(d), which explains a
petitioner’s rights, provided by Congress
in 51 U.S.C. 50916, to request the
agency withhold certain sensitive
information or data from the public,
subject to certain conditions, would be
moved to proposed § 404.3(b). Also,
proposed § 404.3(a)(3) would reference
the waiver exception described in
proposed § 404.7(b). Further, the
provision about public hearings in
current § 404.5(a) would be moved to
proposed § 404.3(g).
Current § 404.3 requires petitioners to
send two copies of their petition to
either AST’s physical address or to the
docket’s physical address. The FAA
proposes to require all petitions be sent
to AST to ensure timely consideration.
The FAA also proposes to remove the
requirement to submit duplicate copies
so that petitioners need only send one
copy of the petition to AST.
The proposal would remove from
§ 404.3 the requirement that a petition
for rulemaking contain a summary that
the FAA may cause to be published in
the Federal Register because part 11
does not require such a summary and
the FAA does not seek public comment
on petitions for rulemaking.
The proposal also would move the
provisions in current §§ 404.5(d) and
404.5(e) to §§ 404.3(e) and 404.3(f),
respectively, because notification and
reconsideration of the Associate
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Administrator’s decision applies to both
petitions for waiver and petitions for
rulemaking.
Proposed § 404.5—Filing a Petition for
Waiver
The proposal would change the
section title from ‘‘Action on petitions’’
to ‘‘Filing a Petition for Waiver.’’ Also,
it would move the waiver procedures
from current § 404.3 to proposed
§ 404.5. Proposed § 404.5 would clarify
the requirements for filing a waiver
request and, as noted in the discussion
of proposed § 404.3, would move the
information in current § 404.5(a) about
public hearings related to petitions to
proposed § 404.3(g).
Current § 404.3 states that the petition
must ‘‘set forth the text or substance of
the regulation . . . to be waived.’’
Proposed § 404.5 would clarify that the
petition must reference the specific
section or sections of 14 CFR chapter III
from which relief is sought. Further, to
help ensure petitions are complete and
meet the requirements of the Act, 51
U.S.C. 50905(b)(3), proposed § 404.5
would clarify that the petition must
state the reasons why granting the
request for relief is in the public interest
and will not jeopardize the public
health and safety, safety of property,
and national security and foreign policy
interests of the United States.
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
EP01JN16.010
Further, the proposal would update
part 404 to reflect current practice. For
example, part 404 does not include the
option for petitioners to file their
petitions electronically.
A discussion of the specific, proposed
changes for part 404 follows.
34921
34922
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Proposed § 404.7—Action on a Petition
for Waiver
in § 404.13(a), the provisions in
§§ 404.17 and 404.19 also apply.
The requirements in current § 404.5
that describe the FAA’s actions on
petitions for waiver would be moved to
proposed § 404.7. Proposed § 404.7
would clarify that under 51 U.S.C.
50905(b)(3), the FAA is not authorized
to grant a waiver that would permit the
launch or reentry of a launch vehicle or
a reentry vehicle without a license or
permit if a human being would be on
board.
Proposed § 404.15—Removed and
Reserved
As discussed under proposed
§ 404.13, the proposal would remove the
current, specified contents of subpart B,
including § 404.15, and add a cross
reference to part 11. In addition, it
would reserve § 404.15 to prevent gaps
in the CFR numbering for part 404.
Proposed § 404.9—Filing a Petition for
Rulemaking
As noted, the current requirements for
filing a petition for rulemaking reside in
§ 404.3. This proposal would remove
those requirements and, instead, new
§ 404.9 would require a petitioner to
follow § 11.71 for filing a petition for
rulemaking. This proposed change
would align the procedures for filing a
petition for rulemaking under part 404
with the procedures for filing all other
petitions for rulemaking made to the
agency.
There are no substantive differences
in the process for filing a petition for
rulemaking with the FAA under part
404 or under § 11.71 of part 11.
Therefore, the FAA does not foresee any
issues with using part 11 procedures for
commercial space petitions for
rulemaking.
Proposed § 404.11—Action on a Petition
for Rulemaking
The requirements in current § 404.5
that describe the FAA’s actions on
petitions for rulemaking would be
removed, and new § 404.11 would cross
reference § 11.73, which includes the
FAA’s actions on petitions for
rulemaking. This change would align
the actions of the FAA on petitions for
rulemaking under part 404 with its
actions regarding all other petitions for
rulemaking made to the agency.
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Proposed § 404.13—Rulemaking
Since the FAA’s general rulemaking
procedures, which apply to all FAA
regulations, including commercial space
transportation regulations, reside in 14
CFR chapter I, part 11, the agency
proposes to remove the general
rulemaking procedures in current
§§ 404.11, 404.13, and 404.15 and,
instead, add a cross reference in
proposed § 404.13(a) to part 11’s general
rulemaking procedures. Also, current
§ 404.17 (Additional rulemaking
proceedings) and § 404.19 (Hearings) of
subpart B would be retained as is. As a
result, proposed § 404.13(b) states that
in addition to the procedures referenced
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
3. Investigations and Enforcement (Part
405)
The agency proposes to change the
title of part 405 to better reflect the
part’s requirements. Part 405 has not
substantially changed since 1988.
Although its current title is
‘‘Investigations and Enforcement,’’ the
part does not apply to investigations.
Instead, requirements for investigations
reside in part 406, entitled
‘‘Investigations, Enforcement, and
Administrative Review.’’
What part 405 actually contains is
requirements for FAA monitoring of
licensed and permitted activities; the
agency’s authority to modify, suspend
or revoke a license or permit; and the
FAA’s authority to issue emergency
orders to terminate, prohibit, or suspend
a licensed or permitted launch or
reentry activity. To avoid confusion, the
FAA proposes to revise the title of part
405 to ‘‘Compliance and Enforcement,’’
to better reflect the content of the part.
4. Equivalent Level of Safety
Currently, the option to satisfy the
requirements of 14 CFR, chapter III by
demonstrating an ‘‘equivalent level of
safety’’ is limited to part 417 (safety of
expendable launch vehicles) and to
specific sections of parts 420 (operation
of a launch site), 437 (experimental
permits), and 460 (human space flight).
The option does not apply to parts 431
and 435, which govern reentry of
reusable launch vehicles and other
reentry vehicles. The FAA addresses
this limitation through the waiver
process, which places an unnecessary
burden on the industry and on the FAA.
Thus, the agency proposes to expand
the availability of its equivalent level of
safety option.
Currently, in parts 420 and 437, the
equivalent level of safety option only
applies to §§ 420.23(a)(3), (b)(4), and
(c)(2); 420.25(a); and, 437.65(b). The
FAA proposes to expand the availability
of the option so that it applies not just
to these specific sections but to parts
420 and 437 in their entirety. Therefore,
this proposal would remove the
equivalent level of safety provision in
these specific sections and replace them
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
with proposed §§ 420.1(b) and 437.1(b).
The proposed change to § 420.23 would
remove current § 420.23(c)(2), move
current § 420.23(c)(3) to proposed
§ 420.23(c)(2) to prevent a gap in
paragraph numbering, and remove
current § 420.23(c)(3) to prevent
identical language from appearing in
both § 420.23(c)(2) and (c)(3). These
proposed sections would require that
each requirement of the part would
apply unless an applicant or licensee
under part 420, or a permittee under
part 437, clearly and convincingly
demonstrates that an alternative
provides an equivalent level of safety to
the requirement of the part.
Current parts 431 and 435 have no
equivalent level of safety option.
Therefore, the FAA proposes to add this
option to the ‘‘General’’ sections of parts
431 and 435 (§§ 431.1 and 435.1,
respectively) so that the option would
apply to these parts in their entirety.
The agency further proposes to
expand the equivalent level of safety
provision now in § 460.5. That
provision, which includes qualification
requirements for a pilot and a remote
operator, currently only extends the
equivalent level of safety option (see
§ 460.5(d)) to a remote operator but not
to a pilot. The FAA proposes amending
§ 460.5(d) to allow an applicant,
licensee, or permittee to satisfy pilot
qualification requirements by
demonstrating an equivalent level of
safety.
IV. Regulatory Notices and Analyses
A. Regulatory Evaluation
Changes to Federal regulations must
undergo several economic analyses.
First, Executive Order 12866 and
Executive Order 13563 direct that each
Federal agency shall propose or adopt a
regulation only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs.
Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic
impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Trade Agreements
Act (Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits agencies
from setting standards that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States. In
developing U.S. standards, the Trade
Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis of
U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4) requires agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits,
and other effects of proposed or final
rules that include a Federal mandate
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
likely to result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more annually (adjusted
for inflation with base year of 1995).
This portion of the preamble
summarizes the FAA’s analysis of the
economic impacts of this proposed rule.
Department of Transportation Order
DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies and
procedures for simplification, analysis,
and review of regulations. If the
expected cost impact is so minimal that
a proposed or final rule does not
warrant a full evaluation, this order
permits that a statement to that effect
and the basis for it to be included in the
preamble if a full regulatory evaluation
of the cost and benefits is not prepared.
Such a determination has been made for
this proposed rule. The reasoning for
this determination follows.
This rule proposes to streamline and
improve commercial space
transportation regulations’ general
rulemaking and petition procedures. It
proposes to do this by updating the rule
language to reflect current practice;
reorganizing it for clarity and flow; and
allowing petitioners to file their
petitions to the FAA’s Office of
Commercial Space Transportation
electronically. In addition, this rule
proposes to expand the option to satisfy
commercial space transportation
requirements by demonstrating an
equivalent level of safety. These changes
are necessary to ensure the regulations
are current, accurate, and not
unnecessarily burdensome.
The intended effect of these proposed
changes is to improve the clarity of the
regulations and reduce burden on the
industry and on the FAA. Increased
clarity could result in fewer requests for
more information and, therefore, in cost
savings. Expanding the equivalent level
of safety option provides more choice to
operators and lowers the number of
waiver requests the FAA must process,
resulting in reduced FAA burden.
Allowing petitioners the option to
submit electronically could result in
small cost savings, from reduced mail
expense.
Since the expected outcome of this
proposal is increased regulatory clarity
with the potential of a minimal cost
impact, a regulatory evaluation was not
prepared. The FAA requests comments
with supporting justification about the
FAA determination of minimal impact.
FAA has, therefore, determined that
this proposed rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as defined in section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, and is not
‘‘significant’’ as defined in DOT’s
Regulatory Policies and Procedures.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
B. Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(Pub. L. 96–354) (RFA) establishes ‘‘as a
principle of regulatory issuance that
agencies shall endeavor, consistent with
the objectives of the rule and of
applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and
informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions subject to
regulation.’’ To achieve this principle,
agencies are required to solicit and
consider flexible regulatory proposals
and to explain the rationale for their
actions to assure that such proposals are
given serious consideration.’’ The RFA
covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-forprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to
determine whether a rule will have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. If
the agency determines that it will, the
agency must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis as described in the
RFA.
However, if an agency determines that
a rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
section 605(b) of the RFA provides that
the head of the agency may so certify
and a regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required. The certification must
include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and
the reasoning should be clear.
This proposal is expected to have an
effect on States, local governments, large
entities such as Boeing and a significant
number of small entities such as Scaled
Composites, LLC, Masten Space
Systems, XCOR Aerospace, Escape
Dynamics, and Space Information
Laboratories.
As this proposed rule would
streamline and clarify FAA rulemaking
procedures, codify current practice and
expand options to demonstrate an
equivalent level of safety, the expected
outcome would have only minimal costs
to minor cost savings impact on any
small entity affected by this rulemaking
action.
If an agency determines that a
rulemaking will not result in a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, the
head of the agency may so certify under
section 605(b) of the RFA. Therefore, as
provided in section 605(b), the head of
the FAA certifies that this rulemaking
will not result in a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34923
C. International Trade Impact
Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(Pub. L. 96–39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub.
L. 103–465), prohibits Federal agencies
from establishing standards or engaging
in related activities that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States.
Pursuant to these Acts, the
establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to
the foreign commerce of the United
States, so long as the standard has a
legitimate domestic objective, such as
the protection of safety, and does not
operate in a manner that excludes
imports that meet this objective. The
statute also requires consideration of
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for
U.S. standards. The FAA has assessed
the potential effect of this proposed rule
and determined that it would impose
the same costs on domestic and
international entities and thus has a
neutral trade impact.
D. Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written statement assessing the effects
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency rule that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more (in
1995 dollars) in any one year by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector; such
a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $155
million in lieu of $100 million.
This proposed rule does not contain
such a mandate; therefore, the
requirements of Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act do not apply.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires that the
FAA consider the impact of paperwork
and other information collection
burdens imposed on the public. The
FAA has determined that there would
be no new requirement for information
collection associated with this proposed
rule.
F. International Compatibility and
Cooperation
(1) In keeping with U.S. obligations
under the Convention on International
Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to
conform to International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) Standards and
Recommended Practices to the
maximum extent practicable. The FAA
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
34924
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
has determined that there are no ICAO
Standards and Recommended Practices
that correspond to these proposed
regulations.
(2) Executive Order 13609, Promoting
International Regulatory Cooperation,
promotes international regulatory
cooperation to meet shared challenges
involving health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues and to
reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unnecessary differences in regulatory
requirements. The FAA has analyzed
this action under the policies and
agency responsibilities of Executive
Order 13609, and has determined that
this action would have no effect on
international regulatory cooperation.
G. Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA
actions that are categorically excluded
from preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act in the
absence of extraordinary circumstances.
The FAA has determined this
rulemaking action qualifies for the
categorical exclusion identified in
paragraph 312f and involves no
extraordinary circumstances.
V. Executive Order Determinations
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this proposed
rule under the principles and criteria of
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. The
agency has determined that this action
would not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, or the relationship
between the Federal Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, and,
therefore, would not have Federalism
implications.
B. Executive Order 13211, Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
The FAA analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). The
agency has determined that it would not
be a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under
the executive order and would not be
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
views. The agency also invites
comments relating to the economic,
environmental, energy, or federalism
impacts that might result from adopting
the proposals in this document. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the proposal, explain
the reason for any recommended
change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters
should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed
electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
The FAA will file in the docket all
comments it receives, as well as a report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerning
this proposed rulemaking. Before acting
on this proposal, the FAA will consider
all comments it receives on or before the
closing date for comments. The FAA
will consider comments filed after the
comment period has closed if it is
possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. The agency may
change this proposal in light of the
comments it receives.
B. Availability of Rulemaking
Documents
An electronic copy of rulemaking
documents may be obtained from the
Internet by—
1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking
Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
2. Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and
Policies Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies or
3. Accessing the Government Printing
Office’s Web page at https://
www.gpo.gov/fdsys/.
Copies may also be obtained by
sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of
Rulemaking, ARM–1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, or
by calling (202) 267–9680. Commenters
must identify the docket or notice
number of this rulemaking.
All documents the FAA considered in
developing this proposed rule,
including economic analyses and
technical reports, may be accessed from
the Internet through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal referenced in item
(1) above.
List of Subjects
VI. Additional Information
14 CFR Part 11
Administrative practice and
procedure, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
A. Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
14 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and
procedure, Space transportation and
exploration.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
14 CFR Part 405
Investigations, Penalties, Space
transportation and exploration.
14 CFR Part 420
Environmental protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Space
transportation and exploration.
14 CFR Part 431
Aviation safety, Environmental
protection, Investigations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Space
transportation and exploration.
14 CFR Part 435
Aviation safety, Environmental
protection, Investigations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Space
transportation and exploration.
14 CFR Part 437
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Space
transportation and exploration.
14 CFR Part 460
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Space
transportation and exploration.
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend chapters I and III of
title 14, Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 11—GENERAL RULEMAKING
PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 11 is
amended to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40101,
40103, 40105, 40109, 40113, 44110, 44502,
44701–44702, 44711, 46102, and 51 U.S.C.
50901–50923.
■
2. Revise § 11.15 to read as follows:
§ 11.15
What is a petition for exemption?
A petition for exemption is a request
to the FAA by an individual or entity
asking for relief from the requirements
of a current regulation. For petitions for
waiver of commercial space
transportation regulations, see part 404
of this title.
■ 3. Revise § 11.27 to read as follows:
§ 11.27 Are there other ways FAA collects
specific rulemaking recommendations
before we issue an NPRM?
Yes, the FAA obtains advice and
recommendations from advisory
committees, including the Aviation
Rulemaking Advisory Committee
(ARAC) for aviation issues and the
Commercial Space Transportation
Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) for
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
commercial space transportation issues.
These advisory committees are formal
standing committees comprised of
representatives of industry, consumer
groups, and interested individuals. In
conducting their activities, ARAC and
COMSTAC comply with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA) and
the direction of FAA. We task these
advisory committees with providing us
with recommended rulemaking actions
dealing with specific areas and
problems. If we accept their
recommendation to change an FAA rule,
we ordinarily publish an NPRM using
the procedures in this part. The FAA
may establish other rulemaking advisory
committees for a limited period of time
as needed to focus on aviation-specific
issues.
■ 4. Amend § 11.63 by revising
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
§ 11.63 How and to whom do I submit my
petition for rulemaking or petition for
exemption?
(a) * * *
(1) By electronic submission, submit
your petition for rulemaking or
exemption to the FAA through the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov,
the Federal Docket Management System
Web site. For additional instructions,
you may visit https://www.faa.gov/
regulations_policies/, and navigate to
the Rulemaking home page.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 404—PETITION AND
RULEMAKING PROCEDURES
5. The authority citation for part 404
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901–50923.
6. The heading of part 404 is revised
to read as set forth above.
■ 7. Remove the headings of subparts A
and B.
■ 8. Revise § 404.1 to read as follows:
■
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 404.1
Scope.
This part establishes procedures for
issuing regulations and for filing a
petition for waiver or petition for
rulemaking to the Associate
Administrator for Commercial Space
Transportation.
■ 9. Amend § 404.3 by revising the
section heading and paragraphs (a)(3),
(b), (c), (d), and adding new paragraphs
(e), (f), and (g) to read as follows:
§ 404.3
General.
(a) * * *
(3) Waive the requirement for a
license, except as provided in § 404.7(b)
of this part.
(b) A petition filed under this section
may request, under § 413.9 of this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:32 May 31, 2016
Jkt 238001
chapter, that the Associate
Administrator withhold certain trade
secrets or proprietary commercial or
financial data from public disclosure.
(c) Each petitioner filing under this
section must:
(1) For electronic submission, send
one copy of the petition by email to the
Office of Commercial Space
Transportation at ASTpetition@faa.gov;
or
(2) For paper submission, send the
petition to the Office of Commercial
Space Transportation, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Room 331, Washington,
DC 20591.
(d) Each petition filed under this
section must include the petitioner’s
name, mailing address, telephone
number and any other contact
information, such as an email address or
a fax number.
(e) Notification. When the Associate
Administrator determines that a petition
should be granted or denied, the
Associate Administrator notifies the
petitioner of the Associate
Administrator’s action and the reasons
supporting the action.
(f) Reconsideration. Any person may
petition the FAA to reconsider a denial
of a petition the person filed. The
petitioner must send a request for
reconsideration within 60 days after
being notified of the denial to the same
address to which the original petition
was filed. For the FAA to accept the
reconsideration request, the petitioner
must show—
(1) There is a significant additional
fact and the reason it was not included
in the original petition;
(2) The FAA made an important
factual error in its denial of the original
petition; or
(3) The denial is not in accordance
with the applicable law and regulations.
(g) Public hearing. No public hearing,
argument or other proceeding is held on
a petition before its disposition under
this section.
■ 10. Revise § 404.5 to read as follows:
§ 404.5
Filing a petition for waiver.
A petition for waiver must be
submitted at least 60 days before the
proposed effective date of the waiver
unless the petitioner shows good cause
for later submission in the petition, and
the petition for waiver must—
(a) Include the specific section or
sections of 14 CFR chapter III from
which the petitioner seeks relief;
(b) Include the extent of the relief
sought and the reason the relief is being
sought;
(c) Include any facts, views, and data
available to the petitioner to support the
waiver request; and
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34925
(d) Show why granting the request for
relief is in the public interest and will
not jeopardize the public health and
safety, safety of property, and national
security and foreign policy interests of
the United States.
■ 11. Add new § 404.7 to read as
follows:
§ 404.7
Action on a petition for waiver.
(a) Grant of waiver. The Associate
Administrator may grant a waiver,
except as provided in paragraph (b) of
this section, if the Associate
Administrator determines that the
waiver is in the public interest and will
not jeopardize public health and safety,
the safety or property, or any national
security or foreign policy interest of the
United States.
(b) The FAA may not grant a waiver
that would permit the launch or reentry
of a launch vehicle or a reentry vehicle
without a license or permit if a human
being will be on board.
(c) Denial of waiver. If the Associate
Administrator determines that the
petition does not justify granting a
waiver, the Associate Administrator
denies the petition.
■ 12. Add new § 404.9 to read as
follows:
§ 404.9
Filing a petition for rulemaking.
A petition for rulemaking filed under
this part must be made in accordance
with 14 CFR 11.71.
■ 13. Revise § 404.11 to read as follows:
§ 404.11 Action on a petition for
rulemaking.
The FAA will process petitions for
rulemaking under this part in
accordance with 14 CFR 11.73.
■ 14. Revise § 404.13 to read as follows:
§ 404.13
Rulemaking.
(a) The FAA’s rulemaking procedures
are located in subpart A chapter I, part
11 under the General, Written
Comments, and Public Meetings and
Other Proceedings headings.
(b) In addition to the rulemaking
procedures referenced in paragraph (a)
of this section, the provisions of
§§ 404.17 and 404.19 of this subpart also
apply.
§ 404.15
■
[Removed and Reserved]
15. Remove and reserve § 404.15.
PART 405—COMPLIANCE AND
ENFORCEMENT
16. The authority citation for part 405
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901–50923.
17. Amend part 405 by revising the
part heading to read as set forth above.
■
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
34926
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 105 / Wednesday, June 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
PART 420—LICENSE TO OPERATE A
LAUNCH SITE
18. The authority citation for part 420
continues to read as follows:
PART 431—LAUNCH AND REENTRY
OF A REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE
(RLV)
■
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901–50923.
■
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901–50923.
19. Revise § 420.1 to read as follows:
§ 420.1
■
General.
(a) Scope. This part prescribes the
information and demonstrations that
must be provided to the FAA as part of
a license application, the bases for
license approval, license terms and
conditions, and post-licensing
requirements with which a licensee
shall comply to remain licensed.
Requirements for preparing a license
application are contained in part 413 of
this subchapter.
(b) Equivalent level of safety. Each
requirement of this part applies unless
the applicant or licensee clearly and
convincingly demonstrates that an
alternative approach provides an
equivalent level of safety to the
requirement of this part.
■ 20. Amend § 420.23 by revising
paragraphs (a)(3), (b)(4), and (c)(2), and
removing paragraph (c)(3) to read as
follows:
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 420.25 Launch site location review—risk
analysis.
(a) If a flight corridor or impact
dispersion area defined by § 420.23
contains a populated area, the applicant
shall estimate the casualty expectation
associated with the flight corridor or
impact dispersion area. An applicant
shall use the methodology provided in
appendix C to this part for guided
orbital or suborbital expendable launch
vehicles and appendix D for unguided
suborbital launch vehicles.
*
*
*
*
*
Jkt 238001
§ 431.1
General.
(a) Scope. This part prescribes
requirements for obtaining a reusable
launch vehicle (RLV) mission license
and post-licensing requirements with
which a licensee must comply to remain
licensed. Requirements for preparing a
license application are contained in part
413 of this subchapter.
(b) Equivalent level of safety. Each
requirement of this part applies unless
the applicant or licensee clearly and
convincingly demonstrates that an
alternative approach provides an
equivalent level of safety to the
requirement of this part.
PART 435—REENTRY OF A REENTRY
VEHICLE OTHER THAN A REUSABLE
LAUNCH VEHICLE (RLV)
24. The authority citation for part 435
continues to read as follows:
■
■
(a) * * *
(3) Uses one of the methodologies
provided in appendix A or B of this
part.
(b) * * *
(4) Uses one of the methodologies
provided in appendices A or B to this
part.
(c) * * *
(2) An applicant shall base its analysis
on an unguided suborbital launch
vehicle whose final launch vehicle stage
apogee represents the intended use of
the launch point.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 21. Amend § 420.25 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
17:32 May 31, 2016
23. Revise § 431.1 to read as follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901–50923.
§ 420.23 Launch site location review—
flight corridor.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22. The authority citation for part 431
continues to read as follows:
■
25. Revise § 435.1 to read as follows:
§ 435.1
General.
(a) Scope. This part prescribes
requirements for obtaining a license to
reenter a reentry vehicle other than a
reusable launch vehicle (RLV), and postlicensing requirements with which a
licensee must comply to remain
licensed. Requirements for preparing a
license application are contained in part
413 of this subchapter.
(b) Equivalent level of safety. Each
requirement of this part applies unless
the applicant or licensee clearly and
convincingly demonstrates that an
alternative approach provides an
equivalent level of safety to the
requirement of this part.
PART 437—EXPERIMENTAL PERMITS
26. The authority citation for part 437
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901–50923.
■
27. Revise § 437.1 to read as follows:
§ 437.1
part.
Scope and organization of this
subchapter contains procedures for
applying for an experimental permit.
(b) Equivalent level of safety. Each
requirement of this part applies unless
the applicant or permittee clearly and
convincingly demonstrates that an
alternative approach provides an
equivalent level of safety to the
requirement of this part.
(c) Organization of this part. Subpart
A contains general information about an
experimental permit. Subpart B contains
requirements to obtain an experimental
permit. Subpart C contains the safety
requirements with which a permittee
must comply while conducting
permitted activities. Subpart D contains
terms and conditions of an experimental
permit.
■ 28. Amend § 437.65 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 437.65
Collision avoidance analysis.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The collision avoidance analysis
must establish each period during
which a permittee may not initiate flight
to ensure that a permitted vehicle and
any jettisoned components do not pass
closer than 200 kilometers to a manned
or mannable orbital object.
PART 460—HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT
REQUIREMENTS
29. The authority citation for part 460
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901–50923.
30. Amend § 460.5 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 460.5
Crew qualifications and training.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) A pilot or a remote operator may
demonstrate an equivalent level of
safety to paragraph (c)(1) of this section
through the license or permit process.
*
*
*
*
*
Issued under authority provided by 49
U.S.C. 106(f) and (g), 44701(a), 44703 and 51
U.S.C. 50901–50923 in Washington, DC, on
May 16, 2016.
George Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial
Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2016–12129 Filed 5–31–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(a) Scope. This part prescribes
requirements for obtaining an
experimental permit. It also prescribes
post-permitting requirements with
which a permittee must comply to
maintain its permit. Part 413 of this
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\01JNP1.SGM
01JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34919-34926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12129]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 11, 404, 405, 420, 431, 435, 437, 460
[Docket No.: FAA-2016-6761; Notice No. 16-03]
RIN 2120-AK76
Updates to Rulemaking and Waiver Procedures and Expansion of the
Equivalent Level of Safety Option
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action would streamline and improve commercial space
transportation regulations' general rulemaking and petition procedures
by reflecting current practice; reorganizing the regulations for
clarity and flow; and allowing petitioners to file their petitions to
the FAA's Office of Commercial Space Transportation electronically.
Further, it would expand the option to satisfy commercial space
transportation requirements by demonstrating an equivalent level of
safety. These changes are necessary to ensure the regulations are
current, accurate, and are not unnecessarily burdensome. The intended
effect of these changes is to improve the clarity of the regulations
and reduce burden on the industry and on the FAA.
DATES: Send comments on or before August 1, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2016-6761
using any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
https://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions concerning this proposed
rule, contact Shirley McBride, AST-300, Office of Commercial Space
Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-7470; email
Shirley.McBride@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The Commercial Space Launch Act of 1984, as amended and re-codified
at 51 U.S.C. 50901-50923 (the Act), authorizes the Department of
Transportation and thus the FAA, through delegations, to oversee,
license, and regulate commercial launch and reentry activities, and the
operation of launch and reentry sites as carried out by U.S. citizens
or within the United States. 51 U.S.C. 50904, 50905. The Act directs
the FAA to exercise this responsibility consistent with public health
and safety, safety of property, and the national security and foreign
policy interests of the United States. 51 U.S.C. 50905. The Act directs
the FAA to regulate only to the extent necessary to protect the public
health and safety, safety of property, and national security and
foreign policy interests of the United States. 51 U.S.C. 50901(a)(7).
The FAA is also responsible for encouraging, facilitating, and
promoting commercial space launches by the private sector. 51 U.S.C.
50903.
I. Background
The Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) was established
under the Act as part of the Office of the Secretary of Transportation
within the Department of Transportation. In 1988, the general
rulemaking and petition procedures, under the authority of the Act,
were codified in 14 CFR, chapter III, part 404.
In November 1995, AST was transferred to the FAA as the agency's
only space-related line of business. The FAA's general rulemaking and
petition procedures, for which the agency follows public rulemaking
procedures under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553, reside
in 14 CFR chapter I, part 11. When AST became part of the FAA, the
general rulemaking and petition procedures in part 404 were not
conformed to those in part 11 to remove duplicate and outdated
information, or to clarify those provisions that apply specifically to
the FAA's commercial space transportation regulations. The proposed
rule would update parts 404 and 11 to remove duplicate information from
part 404 and add appropriate cross references between part 11 and part
404. In addition, the proposal would update part 404 to reflect current
practice, clarify the requirements, and add an option to submit
petitions to AST electronically.
Currently, the option to satisfy a commercial space transportation
regulation by demonstrating an ``equivalent level of safety'' is
limited to part 417 \1\ and to some specific sections of chapter III.
This restricts the FAA's flexibility in approving launch and reentry
related activities where the operator can convincingly demonstrate that
an alternative approach to the requirements of chapter III provides an
equivalent level of safety. This proposal would expand the equivalent
level of safety option so that it applies more broadly to chapter III
requirements for both launch and reentry activities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Sec. 417.1(g): Equivalent level of safety. The
requirements of this part apply to a launch operator and the launch
operator's launch unless the launch operator clearly and
convincingly demonstrates that an alternative approach provides an
equivalent level of safety.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The current title of part 405 is ``Investigations and
Enforcement.'' However, part 405 does not relate to investigations. To
avoid confusion, the FAA proposes to revise the title of part 405 to a
title more descriptive of its contents, namely, ``Compliance and
Enforcement.''
II. Discussion of the Proposal
1. General Rulemaking Procedures (Part 11)
The general rulemaking and petition procedures for commercial space
transportation regulations, 14 CFR
[[Page 34920]]
chapter III, part 404, are not aligned with the FAA's general
rulemaking and petition procedures located in 14 CFR chapter I, part
11. This has caused some confusion about how the two parts relate to
each other and what requirements apply specifically to commercial space
transportation regulations. Additionally, there is no option to file
petitions electronically under chapter III.
The FAA proposes minor changes to part 11 to clarify that this part
applies to all FAA regulations, including commercial space
transportation regulations, except as otherwise noted. Also, the FAA
proposes to correct an outdated Internet link in part 11.
Sec. 11.15--What is a petition for exemption?
The FAA proposes to amend Sec. 11.15 to cross reference part 404
for commercial space transportation waivers. Authority for the FAA's
aviation safety oversight falls under Title 49 U.S.C., while the
agency's authority for commercial space transportation oversight falls
under 51 U.S.C. 50901-50923. Title 49 allows for ``exemptions'' as
requests for relief from a regulatory requirement, whereas Title 51
allows the Secretary to ``waive'' regulatory requirements. To retain
the distinction of terms under both statutes, the FAA proposes to
revise Sec. 11.15 to cross reference part 404, which describes the
agency's delegated authority to issue commercial space transportation
waivers.
Sec. 11.27--Are there other ways FAA collects specific rulemaking
recommendations before we issue an NPRM?
The FAA proposes to add the Commercial Space Transportation
Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) as an example of an advisory committee the
FAA uses to review and provide advice on various issues. While the FAA
uses the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) for aviation-
specific issues, it uses COMSTAC for commercial space transportation
issues. ARAC is comprised of representatives from the aviation
industry. COMSTAC includes representatives from the commercial space
industry.
Sec. 11.63--How and to whom do I submit my petition for rulemaking or
petition for exemption?
The proposal would amend this section to remove an outdated
Internet address in Sec. 11.63(a)(1), ``https://www.faa.gov/regulations,'' where petitioners are directed to find additional
instructions on filing their petitions, and replace it with a
description of where it could be found. This is because an Internet
address may be subject to change, and a description would be more
flexible while still providing adequate instruction.
2. Petitions for Waiver and Rulemaking (Part 404)
Currently, part 404, subpart A is organized such that requirements
for filing and processing a petition for waiver and a petition for
rulemaking are combined in the same sections, Sec. Sec. 404.3 and
404.5. This causes confusion because while some requirements apply to
both petition for waiver and petition for rulemaking, certain others
apply only to one or to the other. Having requirements for both types
of petitions in the same sections make it difficult to determine which
requirement applies to which type of petition. The agency proposes to
establish separate sections for requirements applicable to both
petitions for waiver and petitions for rulemaking (proposed Sec. Sec.
404.1 and 404.3), requirements applicable only to petitions for waiver
(proposed Sec. Sec. 404.5 and 404.7), and those applicable only to
petitions for rulemaking (proposed Sec. Sec. 404.9 and 404.11).
Current subpart B of part 404 includes general rulemaking
procedures that duplicate those in chapter I, part 11. The FAA proposes
to reorganize subpart B to remove the duplicate information and add
relevant cross references to part 11.
The FAA also proposes to remove the subpart titles in part 404
because the other organizational changes to part 404 would remove the
need to use subpart titles as guides.
Additionally, and as indicated in the ``Proposed Reorganization--
Part 404'' table below, in order to accommodate the reorganization of
part 404, the current part title, some section titles, and some section
numbers would change. Also, new sections would be added.
[[Page 34921]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP01JN16.010
Further, the proposal would update part 404 to reflect current
practice. For example, part 404 does not include the option for
petitioners to file their petitions electronically.
A discussion of the specific, proposed changes for part 404
follows.
Proposed Sec. 404.1--Scope
The FAA proposes to revise Sec. 404.1 to clarify the scope of part
404. Currently Sec. 404.1 states that part 404 ``establishes
procedures for issuing regulations to implement 51 U.S.C. Subtitle V,
chapter 509, and for eliminating or waiving requirements for licensing
or permitting of commercial space transportation activities under that
statute.'' The FAA would revise Sec. 404.1 to state that part 404
establishes procedures for issuing regulations and for filing a
petition for waiver or a petition for rulemaking to the Associate
Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
Proposed Sec. 404.3--General
The FAA proposes to change the title of this section from ``Filing
of petitions to the Associate Administrator'' to ``General'' to reflect
the reorganization of the part.
The reorganized section would include information applicable to
both petitions for waiver and petitions for rulemaking. This
information would include the physical address to which petitioners
should send their petitions, as well as the option to file petitions to
AST electronically by using the specified FAA email address.
Current Sec. 404.3(d), which explains a petitioner's rights,
provided by Congress in 51 U.S.C. 50916, to request the agency withhold
certain sensitive information or data from the public, subject to
certain conditions, would be moved to proposed Sec. 404.3(b). Also,
proposed Sec. 404.3(a)(3) would reference the waiver exception
described in proposed Sec. 404.7(b). Further, the provision about
public hearings in current Sec. 404.5(a) would be moved to proposed
Sec. 404.3(g).
Current Sec. 404.3 requires petitioners to send two copies of
their petition to either AST's physical address or to the docket's
physical address. The FAA proposes to require all petitions be sent to
AST to ensure timely consideration. The FAA also proposes to remove the
requirement to submit duplicate copies so that petitioners need only
send one copy of the petition to AST.
The proposal would remove from Sec. 404.3 the requirement that a
petition for rulemaking contain a summary that the FAA may cause to be
published in the Federal Register because part 11 does not require such
a summary and the FAA does not seek public comment on petitions for
rulemaking.
The proposal also would move the provisions in current Sec. Sec.
404.5(d) and 404.5(e) to Sec. Sec. 404.3(e) and 404.3(f),
respectively, because notification and reconsideration of the Associate
Administrator's decision applies to both petitions for waiver and
petitions for rulemaking.
Proposed Sec. 404.5--Filing a Petition for Waiver
The proposal would change the section title from ``Action on
petitions'' to ``Filing a Petition for Waiver.'' Also, it would move
the waiver procedures from current Sec. 404.3 to proposed Sec. 404.5.
Proposed Sec. 404.5 would clarify the requirements for filing a waiver
request and, as noted in the discussion of proposed Sec. 404.3, would
move the information in current Sec. 404.5(a) about public hearings
related to petitions to proposed Sec. 404.3(g).
Current Sec. 404.3 states that the petition must ``set forth the
text or substance of the regulation . . . to be waived.'' Proposed
Sec. 404.5 would clarify that the petition must reference the specific
section or sections of 14 CFR chapter III from which relief is sought.
Further, to help ensure petitions are complete and meet the
requirements of the Act, 51 U.S.C. 50905(b)(3), proposed Sec. 404.5
would clarify that the petition must state the reasons why granting the
request for relief is in the public interest and will not jeopardize
the public health and safety, safety of property, and national security
and foreign policy interests of the United States.
[[Page 34922]]
Proposed Sec. 404.7--Action on a Petition for Waiver
The requirements in current Sec. 404.5 that describe the FAA's
actions on petitions for waiver would be moved to proposed Sec. 404.7.
Proposed Sec. 404.7 would clarify that under 51 U.S.C. 50905(b)(3),
the FAA is not authorized to grant a waiver that would permit the
launch or reentry of a launch vehicle or a reentry vehicle without a
license or permit if a human being would be on board.
Proposed Sec. 404.9--Filing a Petition for Rulemaking
As noted, the current requirements for filing a petition for
rulemaking reside in Sec. 404.3. This proposal would remove those
requirements and, instead, new Sec. 404.9 would require a petitioner
to follow Sec. 11.71 for filing a petition for rulemaking. This
proposed change would align the procedures for filing a petition for
rulemaking under part 404 with the procedures for filing all other
petitions for rulemaking made to the agency.
There are no substantive differences in the process for filing a
petition for rulemaking with the FAA under part 404 or under Sec.
11.71 of part 11. Therefore, the FAA does not foresee any issues with
using part 11 procedures for commercial space petitions for rulemaking.
Proposed Sec. 404.11--Action on a Petition for Rulemaking
The requirements in current Sec. 404.5 that describe the FAA's
actions on petitions for rulemaking would be removed, and new Sec.
404.11 would cross reference Sec. 11.73, which includes the FAA's
actions on petitions for rulemaking. This change would align the
actions of the FAA on petitions for rulemaking under part 404 with its
actions regarding all other petitions for rulemaking made to the
agency.
Proposed Sec. 404.13--Rulemaking
Since the FAA's general rulemaking procedures, which apply to all
FAA regulations, including commercial space transportation regulations,
reside in 14 CFR chapter I, part 11, the agency proposes to remove the
general rulemaking procedures in current Sec. Sec. 404.11, 404.13, and
404.15 and, instead, add a cross reference in proposed Sec. 404.13(a)
to part 11's general rulemaking procedures. Also, current Sec. 404.17
(Additional rulemaking proceedings) and Sec. 404.19 (Hearings) of
subpart B would be retained as is. As a result, proposed Sec.
404.13(b) states that in addition to the procedures referenced in Sec.
404.13(a), the provisions in Sec. Sec. 404.17 and 404.19 also apply.
Proposed Sec. 404.15--Removed and Reserved
As discussed under proposed Sec. 404.13, the proposal would remove
the current, specified contents of subpart B, including Sec. 404.15,
and add a cross reference to part 11. In addition, it would reserve
Sec. 404.15 to prevent gaps in the CFR numbering for part 404.
3. Investigations and Enforcement (Part 405)
The agency proposes to change the title of part 405 to better
reflect the part's requirements. Part 405 has not substantially changed
since 1988. Although its current title is ``Investigations and
Enforcement,'' the part does not apply to investigations. Instead,
requirements for investigations reside in part 406, entitled
``Investigations, Enforcement, and Administrative Review.''
What part 405 actually contains is requirements for FAA monitoring
of licensed and permitted activities; the agency's authority to modify,
suspend or revoke a license or permit; and the FAA's authority to issue
emergency orders to terminate, prohibit, or suspend a licensed or
permitted launch or reentry activity. To avoid confusion, the FAA
proposes to revise the title of part 405 to ``Compliance and
Enforcement,'' to better reflect the content of the part.
4. Equivalent Level of Safety
Currently, the option to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR,
chapter III by demonstrating an ``equivalent level of safety'' is
limited to part 417 (safety of expendable launch vehicles) and to
specific sections of parts 420 (operation of a launch site), 437
(experimental permits), and 460 (human space flight). The option does
not apply to parts 431 and 435, which govern reentry of reusable launch
vehicles and other reentry vehicles. The FAA addresses this limitation
through the waiver process, which places an unnecessary burden on the
industry and on the FAA. Thus, the agency proposes to expand the
availability of its equivalent level of safety option.
Currently, in parts 420 and 437, the equivalent level of safety
option only applies to Sec. Sec. 420.23(a)(3), (b)(4), and (c)(2);
420.25(a); and, 437.65(b). The FAA proposes to expand the availability
of the option so that it applies not just to these specific sections
but to parts 420 and 437 in their entirety. Therefore, this proposal
would remove the equivalent level of safety provision in these specific
sections and replace them with proposed Sec. Sec. 420.1(b) and
437.1(b). The proposed change to Sec. 420.23 would remove current
Sec. 420.23(c)(2), move current Sec. 420.23(c)(3) to proposed Sec.
420.23(c)(2) to prevent a gap in paragraph numbering, and remove
current Sec. 420.23(c)(3) to prevent identical language from appearing
in both Sec. 420.23(c)(2) and (c)(3). These proposed sections would
require that each requirement of the part would apply unless an
applicant or licensee under part 420, or a permittee under part 437,
clearly and convincingly demonstrates that an alternative provides an
equivalent level of safety to the requirement of the part.
Current parts 431 and 435 have no equivalent level of safety
option. Therefore, the FAA proposes to add this option to the
``General'' sections of parts 431 and 435 (Sec. Sec. 431.1 and 435.1,
respectively) so that the option would apply to these parts in their
entirety.
The agency further proposes to expand the equivalent level of
safety provision now in Sec. 460.5. That provision, which includes
qualification requirements for a pilot and a remote operator, currently
only extends the equivalent level of safety option (see Sec. 460.5(d))
to a remote operator but not to a pilot. The FAA proposes amending
Sec. 460.5(d) to allow an applicant, licensee, or permittee to satisfy
pilot qualification requirements by demonstrating an equivalent level
of safety.
IV. Regulatory Notices and Analyses
A. Regulatory Evaluation
Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic
analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 and Executive Order 13563 direct
that each Federal agency shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon
a reasoned determination that the benefits of the intended regulation
justify its costs. Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub.
L. 96-354) requires agencies to analyze the economic impact of
regulatory changes on small entities. Third, the Trade Agreements Act
(Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits agencies from setting standards that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States. In
developing U.S. standards, the Trade Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis
of U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of
the costs, benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that
include a Federal mandate
[[Page 34923]]
likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with base year of
1995). This portion of the preamble summarizes the FAA's analysis of
the economic impacts of this proposed rule.
Department of Transportation Order DOT 2100.5 prescribes policies
and procedures for simplification, analysis, and review of regulations.
If the expected cost impact is so minimal that a proposed or final rule
does not warrant a full evaluation, this order permits that a statement
to that effect and the basis for it to be included in the preamble if a
full regulatory evaluation of the cost and benefits is not prepared.
Such a determination has been made for this proposed rule. The
reasoning for this determination follows.
This rule proposes to streamline and improve commercial space
transportation regulations' general rulemaking and petition procedures.
It proposes to do this by updating the rule language to reflect current
practice; reorganizing it for clarity and flow; and allowing
petitioners to file their petitions to the FAA's Office of Commercial
Space Transportation electronically. In addition, this rule proposes to
expand the option to satisfy commercial space transportation
requirements by demonstrating an equivalent level of safety. These
changes are necessary to ensure the regulations are current, accurate,
and not unnecessarily burdensome.
The intended effect of these proposed changes is to improve the
clarity of the regulations and reduce burden on the industry and on the
FAA. Increased clarity could result in fewer requests for more
information and, therefore, in cost savings. Expanding the equivalent
level of safety option provides more choice to operators and lowers the
number of waiver requests the FAA must process, resulting in reduced
FAA burden. Allowing petitioners the option to submit electronically
could result in small cost savings, from reduced mail expense.
Since the expected outcome of this proposal is increased regulatory
clarity with the potential of a minimal cost impact, a regulatory
evaluation was not prepared. The FAA requests comments with supporting
justification about the FAA determination of minimal impact.
FAA has, therefore, determined that this proposed rule is not a
``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, and is not ``significant'' as defined in DOT's
Regulatory Policies and Procedures.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation.'' To achieve this principle, agencies are
required to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to
explain the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals
are given serious consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide-range of small
entities, including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and
small governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.
However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the
agency may so certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. The certification must include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and the reasoning should be
clear.
This proposal is expected to have an effect on States, local
governments, large entities such as Boeing and a significant number of
small entities such as Scaled Composites, LLC, Masten Space Systems,
XCOR Aerospace, Escape Dynamics, and Space Information Laboratories.
As this proposed rule would streamline and clarify FAA rulemaking
procedures, codify current practice and expand options to demonstrate
an equivalent level of safety, the expected outcome would have only
minimal costs to minor cost savings impact on any small entity affected
by this rulemaking action.
If an agency determines that a rulemaking will not result in a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
the head of the agency may so certify under section 605(b) of the RFA.
Therefore, as provided in section 605(b), the head of the FAA certifies
that this rulemaking will not result in a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities.
C. International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465), prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing standards or engaging in related activities
that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States. Pursuant to these Acts, the establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to the foreign commerce of the
United States, so long as the standard has a legitimate domestic
objective, such as the protection of safety, and does not operate in a
manner that excludes imports that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA has
assessed the potential effect of this proposed rule and determined that
it would impose the same costs on domestic and international entities
and thus has a neutral trade impact.
D. Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(in 1995 dollars) in any one year by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a mandate
is deemed to be a ``significant regulatory action.'' The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $155 million in lieu of $100
million.
This proposed rule does not contain such a mandate; therefore, the
requirements of Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act do not
apply.
E. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires
that the FAA consider the impact of paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the public. The FAA has determined that
there would be no new requirement for information collection associated
with this proposed rule.
F. International Compatibility and Cooperation
(1) In keeping with U.S. obligations under the Convention on
International Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to conform to
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards and
Recommended Practices to the maximum extent practicable. The FAA
[[Page 34924]]
has determined that there are no ICAO Standards and Recommended
Practices that correspond to these proposed regulations.
(2) Executive Order 13609, Promoting International Regulatory
Cooperation, promotes international regulatory cooperation to meet
shared challenges involving health, safety, labor, security,
environmental, and other issues and to reduce, eliminate, or prevent
unnecessary differences in regulatory requirements. The FAA has
analyzed this action under the policies and agency responsibilities of
Executive Order 13609, and has determined that this action would have
no effect on international regulatory cooperation.
G. Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA actions that are categorically
excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. The FAA has
determined this rulemaking action qualifies for the categorical
exclusion identified in paragraph 312f and involves no extraordinary
circumstances.
V. Executive Order Determinations
A. Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this proposed rule under the principles and
criteria of Executive Order 13132, Federalism. The agency has
determined that this action would not have a substantial direct effect
on the States, or the relationship between the Federal Government and
the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government, and, therefore, would not have
Federalism implications.
B. Executive Order 13211, Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
The FAA analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). The agency has determined that it
would not be a ``significant energy action'' under the executive order
and would not be likely to have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
VI. Additional Information
A. Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. The agency
also invites comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy,
or federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in
this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion
of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written
comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should
submit only one time.
The FAA will file in the docket all comments it receives, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this
proposal, the FAA will consider all comments it receives on or before
the closing date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed
after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without
incurring expense or delay. The agency may change this proposal in
light of the comments it receives.
B. Availability of Rulemaking Documents
An electronic copy of rulemaking documents may be obtained from the
Internet by--
1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking Portal (https://www.regulations.gov);
2. Visiting the FAA's Regulations and Policies Web page at https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies or
3. Accessing the Government Printing Office's Web page at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/.
Copies may also be obtained by sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267-9680.
Commenters must identify the docket or notice number of this
rulemaking.
All documents the FAA considered in developing this proposed rule,
including economic analyses and technical reports, may be accessed from
the Internet through the Federal eRulemaking Portal referenced in item
(1) above.
List of Subjects
14 CFR Part 11
Administrative practice and procedure, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
14 CFR Part 404
Administrative practice and procedure, Space transportation and
exploration.
14 CFR Part 405
Investigations, Penalties, Space transportation and exploration.
14 CFR Part 420
Environmental protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Space transportation and exploration.
14 CFR Part 431
Aviation safety, Environmental protection, Investigations,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Space transportation and
exploration.
14 CFR Part 435
Aviation safety, Environmental protection, Investigations,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Space transportation and
exploration.
14 CFR Part 437
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Space transportation and exploration.
14 CFR Part 460
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Space transportation and exploration.
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend chapters I and III of title 14, Code
of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 11--GENERAL RULEMAKING PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 11 is amended to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40101, 40103, 40105, 40109,
40113, 44110, 44502, 44701-44702, 44711, 46102, and 51 U.S.C. 50901-
50923.
0
2. Revise Sec. 11.15 to read as follows:
Sec. 11.15 What is a petition for exemption?
A petition for exemption is a request to the FAA by an individual
or entity asking for relief from the requirements of a current
regulation. For petitions for waiver of commercial space transportation
regulations, see part 404 of this title.
0
3. Revise Sec. 11.27 to read as follows:
Sec. 11.27 Are there other ways FAA collects specific rulemaking
recommendations before we issue an NPRM?
Yes, the FAA obtains advice and recommendations from advisory
committees, including the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC)
for aviation issues and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory
Committee (COMSTAC) for
[[Page 34925]]
commercial space transportation issues. These advisory committees are
formal standing committees comprised of representatives of industry,
consumer groups, and interested individuals. In conducting their
activities, ARAC and COMSTAC comply with the Federal Advisory Committee
Act (FACA) and the direction of FAA. We task these advisory committees
with providing us with recommended rulemaking actions dealing with
specific areas and problems. If we accept their recommendation to
change an FAA rule, we ordinarily publish an NPRM using the procedures
in this part. The FAA may establish other rulemaking advisory
committees for a limited period of time as needed to focus on aviation-
specific issues.
0
4. Amend Sec. 11.63 by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 11.63 How and to whom do I submit my petition for rulemaking or
petition for exemption?
(a) * * *
(1) By electronic submission, submit your petition for rulemaking
or exemption to the FAA through the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov, the Federal Docket Management System Web site. For
additional instructions, you may visit https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/, and navigate to the Rulemaking home page.
* * * * *
PART 404--PETITION AND RULEMAKING PROCEDURES
0
5. The authority citation for part 404 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901-50923.
0
6. The heading of part 404 is revised to read as set forth above.
0
7. Remove the headings of subparts A and B.
0
8. Revise Sec. 404.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 404.1 Scope.
This part establishes procedures for issuing regulations and for
filing a petition for waiver or petition for rulemaking to the
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
0
9. Amend Sec. 404.3 by revising the section heading and paragraphs
(a)(3), (b), (c), (d), and adding new paragraphs (e), (f), and (g) to
read as follows:
Sec. 404.3 General.
(a) * * *
(3) Waive the requirement for a license, except as provided in
Sec. 404.7(b) of this part.
(b) A petition filed under this section may request, under Sec.
413.9 of this chapter, that the Associate Administrator withhold
certain trade secrets or proprietary commercial or financial data from
public disclosure.
(c) Each petitioner filing under this section must:
(1) For electronic submission, send one copy of the petition by
email to the Office of Commercial Space Transportation at
ASTpetition@faa.gov; or
(2) For paper submission, send the petition to the Office of
Commercial Space Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Room 331, Washington, DC 20591.
(d) Each petition filed under this section must include the
petitioner's name, mailing address, telephone number and any other
contact information, such as an email address or a fax number.
(e) Notification. When the Associate Administrator determines that
a petition should be granted or denied, the Associate Administrator
notifies the petitioner of the Associate Administrator's action and the
reasons supporting the action.
(f) Reconsideration. Any person may petition the FAA to reconsider
a denial of a petition the person filed. The petitioner must send a
request for reconsideration within 60 days after being notified of the
denial to the same address to which the original petition was filed.
For the FAA to accept the reconsideration request, the petitioner must
show--
(1) There is a significant additional fact and the reason it was
not included in the original petition;
(2) The FAA made an important factual error in its denial of the
original petition; or
(3) The denial is not in accordance with the applicable law and
regulations.
(g) Public hearing. No public hearing, argument or other proceeding
is held on a petition before its disposition under this section.
0
10. Revise Sec. 404.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 404.5 Filing a petition for waiver.
A petition for waiver must be submitted at least 60 days before the
proposed effective date of the waiver unless the petitioner shows good
cause for later submission in the petition, and the petition for waiver
must--
(a) Include the specific section or sections of 14 CFR chapter III
from which the petitioner seeks relief;
(b) Include the extent of the relief sought and the reason the
relief is being sought;
(c) Include any facts, views, and data available to the petitioner
to support the waiver request; and
(d) Show why granting the request for relief is in the public
interest and will not jeopardize the public health and safety, safety
of property, and national security and foreign policy interests of the
United States.
0
11. Add new Sec. 404.7 to read as follows:
Sec. 404.7 Action on a petition for waiver.
(a) Grant of waiver. The Associate Administrator may grant a
waiver, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, if the
Associate Administrator determines that the waiver is in the public
interest and will not jeopardize public health and safety, the safety
or property, or any national security or foreign policy interest of the
United States.
(b) The FAA may not grant a waiver that would permit the launch or
reentry of a launch vehicle or a reentry vehicle without a license or
permit if a human being will be on board.
(c) Denial of waiver. If the Associate Administrator determines
that the petition does not justify granting a waiver, the Associate
Administrator denies the petition.
0
12. Add new Sec. 404.9 to read as follows:
Sec. 404.9 Filing a petition for rulemaking.
A petition for rulemaking filed under this part must be made in
accordance with 14 CFR 11.71.
0
13. Revise Sec. 404.11 to read as follows:
Sec. 404.11 Action on a petition for rulemaking.
The FAA will process petitions for rulemaking under this part in
accordance with 14 CFR 11.73.
0
14. Revise Sec. 404.13 to read as follows:
Sec. 404.13 Rulemaking.
(a) The FAA's rulemaking procedures are located in subpart A
chapter I, part 11 under the General, Written Comments, and Public
Meetings and Other Proceedings headings.
(b) In addition to the rulemaking procedures referenced in
paragraph (a) of this section, the provisions of Sec. Sec. 404.17 and
404.19 of this subpart also apply.
Sec. 404.15 [Removed and Reserved]
0
15. Remove and reserve Sec. 404.15.
PART 405--COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT
0
16. The authority citation for part 405 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901-50923.
0
17. Amend part 405 by revising the part heading to read as set forth
above.
[[Page 34926]]
PART 420--LICENSE TO OPERATE A LAUNCH SITE
0
18. The authority citation for part 420 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901-50923.
0
19. Revise Sec. 420.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 420.1 General.
(a) Scope. This part prescribes the information and demonstrations
that must be provided to the FAA as part of a license application, the
bases for license approval, license terms and conditions, and post-
licensing requirements with which a licensee shall comply to remain
licensed. Requirements for preparing a license application are
contained in part 413 of this subchapter.
(b) Equivalent level of safety. Each requirement of this part
applies unless the applicant or licensee clearly and convincingly
demonstrates that an alternative approach provides an equivalent level
of safety to the requirement of this part.
0
20. Amend Sec. 420.23 by revising paragraphs (a)(3), (b)(4), and
(c)(2), and removing paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 420.23 Launch site location review--flight corridor.
(a) * * *
(3) Uses one of the methodologies provided in appendix A or B of
this part.
(b) * * *
(4) Uses one of the methodologies provided in appendices A or B to
this part.
(c) * * *
(2) An applicant shall base its analysis on an unguided suborbital
launch vehicle whose final launch vehicle stage apogee represents the
intended use of the launch point.
* * * * *
0
21. Amend Sec. 420.25 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 420.25 Launch site location review--risk analysis.
(a) If a flight corridor or impact dispersion area defined by Sec.
420.23 contains a populated area, the applicant shall estimate the
casualty expectation associated with the flight corridor or impact
dispersion area. An applicant shall use the methodology provided in
appendix C to this part for guided orbital or suborbital expendable
launch vehicles and appendix D for unguided suborbital launch vehicles.
* * * * *
PART 431--LAUNCH AND REENTRY OF A REUSABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE (RLV)
0
22. The authority citation for part 431 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901-50923.
0
23. Revise Sec. 431.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 431.1 General.
(a) Scope. This part prescribes requirements for obtaining a
reusable launch vehicle (RLV) mission license and post-licensing
requirements with which a licensee must comply to remain licensed.
Requirements for preparing a license application are contained in part
413 of this subchapter.
(b) Equivalent level of safety. Each requirement of this part
applies unless the applicant or licensee clearly and convincingly
demonstrates that an alternative approach provides an equivalent level
of safety to the requirement of this part.
PART 435--REENTRY OF A REENTRY VEHICLE OTHER THAN A REUSABLE LAUNCH
VEHICLE (RLV)
0
24. The authority citation for part 435 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901-50923.
0
25. Revise Sec. 435.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 435.1 General.
(a) Scope. This part prescribes requirements for obtaining a
license to reenter a reentry vehicle other than a reusable launch
vehicle (RLV), and post-licensing requirements with which a licensee
must comply to remain licensed. Requirements for preparing a license
application are contained in part 413 of this subchapter.
(b) Equivalent level of safety. Each requirement of this part
applies unless the applicant or licensee clearly and convincingly
demonstrates that an alternative approach provides an equivalent level
of safety to the requirement of this part.
PART 437--EXPERIMENTAL PERMITS
0
26. The authority citation for part 437 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901-50923.
0
27. Revise Sec. 437.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 437.1 Scope and organization of this part.
(a) Scope. This part prescribes requirements for obtaining an
experimental permit. It also prescribes post-permitting requirements
with which a permittee must comply to maintain its permit. Part 413 of
this subchapter contains procedures for applying for an experimental
permit.
(b) Equivalent level of safety. Each requirement of this part
applies unless the applicant or permittee clearly and convincingly
demonstrates that an alternative approach provides an equivalent level
of safety to the requirement of this part.
(c) Organization of this part. Subpart A contains general
information about an experimental permit. Subpart B contains
requirements to obtain an experimental permit. Subpart C contains the
safety requirements with which a permittee must comply while conducting
permitted activities. Subpart D contains terms and conditions of an
experimental permit.
0
28. Amend Sec. 437.65 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 437.65 Collision avoidance analysis.
* * * * *
(b) The collision avoidance analysis must establish each period
during which a permittee may not initiate flight to ensure that a
permitted vehicle and any jettisoned components do not pass closer than
200 kilometers to a manned or mannable orbital object.
PART 460--HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT REQUIREMENTS
0
29. The authority citation for part 460 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901-50923.
0
30. Amend Sec. 460.5 by revising paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 460.5 Crew qualifications and training.
* * * * *
(d) A pilot or a remote operator may demonstrate an equivalent
level of safety to paragraph (c)(1) of this section through the license
or permit process.
* * * * *
Issued under authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f) and (g),
44701(a), 44703 and 51 U.S.C. 50901-50923 in Washington, DC, on May
16, 2016.
George Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2016-12129 Filed 5-31-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P