Categorical Exclusions, 34271-34274 [2016-12577]
Download as PDF
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 104 / Tuesday, May 31, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
following performance characteristics
must be demonstrated:
(i) Ability of the device to detect
diurnal changes.
(ii) Tolerability of the system at the
corneoscleral interface in the intended
use population.
(2) Nonclinical testing must validate
measurements in an appropriate
nonclinical testing model to ensure
ability to detect changes in intraocular
pressure.
(3) Patient-contacting components
must be demonstrated to be
biocompatible.
(4) Any component that is intended to
contact the eye must be demonstrated to
be sterile throughout its intended shelf
life.
(5) Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis must be performed.
(6) Performance testing must
demonstrate the electromagnetic
compatibility and electromagnetic
interference of the device.
(7) Performance testing must
demonstrate electrical safety of the
device.
(8) Labeling must include the
following:
(i) Warning against activities and
environments that may put the user at
greater risk.
(ii) Specific instructions for the safe
use of the device, which includes:
(A) Description of all device
components and instructions for
assembling the device;
(B) Explanations of all available
programs and instructions for their use;
(C) Instructions and explanation of all
user-interface components;
(D) Instructions on all safety features
of the device; and
(E) Instructions for properly
maintaining the device.
(iii) A summary of nonclinical testing
information to describe EMC safety
considerations.
(iv) A summary of safety information
obtained from clinical testing.
(v) Patient labeling to convey
information regarding appropriate use of
device.
Dated: May 24, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016–12683 Filed 5–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 May 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 771
Federal Transit Administration
49 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. FHWA–2016–0008]
RIN 2125–AF69; 2132–AB29
Categorical Exclusions
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Federal
Transit Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends FHWA
and FTA categorical exclusions (CE) for
projects receiving limited Federal
assistance to reflect a requirement in the
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation
(FAST) Act to index for inflation the
monetary thresholds for these CEs. This
final rule also implements a provision
in the FAST Act that directs FHWA to
amend its rules on programmatic
agreements for CEs. The amendments
contained in this rule reflect statutory
language in the FAST Act.
DATES: Effective on June 30, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
the Federal Highway Administration:
Owen Lindauer, Ph.D., Office of Project
Delivery and Environmental Review,
HEPE, (202) 366–2655, Owen.Lindauer@
dot.gov, or Jennifer Mayo, Office of the
Chief Counsel, (202) 366–1523,
Jennifer.Mayo@dot.gov. For FTA: Megan
Blum, Office of Planning and
Environment, (202) 366–0463,
Megan.Blum@dot.gov, or Nancy-Ellen
Zusman, Office of Chief Counsel, (312)
353–2577, NancyEllen.Zusman@
dot.gov. The FHWA and FTA are both
located at 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE.,
Washington, DC 20590–0001. Office
hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
E.T., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Access and Filing
This document may be viewed online
through the Federal eRulemaking portal
at https://www.regulations.gov. Retrieval
help and guidelines are available on the
Web site. It is available 24 hours each
day, 365 days a year. An electronic copy
of this document may also be
downloaded from the Office of the
Federal Register home page at: https://
www.ofr.gov and the Government
Printing Office Web page at: https://
www.gpo.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34271
Background
On December 4, 2015, President
Obama signed into law the FAST Act,
Public Law 114–94, 129 Stat. 1312,
which contains new requirements that
FHWA and FTA (hereafter referred to as
‘‘the Agencies’’) must meet in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Section 1314(a) of
the FAST Act amends section 1317 of
the Moving Ahead for Progress in the
21st Century Act (MAP–21), Public Law
112–141, 126 Stat. 405, by inserting ‘‘(as
adjusted annually by the Secretary to
reflect any increases in the Consumer
Price Index prepared by the Department
of Labor)’’ after ‘‘$5,000,000’’ in
paragraph (1)(A) and after
‘‘$30,000,000’’ in paragraph (1)(B) of the
CE for projects receiving limited Federal
financial assistance. The Agencies relied
on the authority in MAP–21, section
1317 to establish limited Federal
financial assistance CEs for FHWA at 23
CFR 771.117(c)(23) and for FTA at 23
CFR 771.118(c)(13). Those CEs were
published in a final rule in the Federal
Register on January 13, 2014 (79 FR
2107). With this final rule, the Agencies
are amending the limited Federal
financial assistance CEs to incorporate
the adjustment for inflation requirement
created by the FAST Act.
The Agencies included a reference to
their respective Web sites
(www.fhwa.dot.gov and
www.fta.dot.gov) in the CE language in
order to provide a source for locating
the consumer price index (CPI), as
adjusted annually. Per the FAST Act,
section 1314(b), the first adjustment
made pursuant to section 1314(a) must
reflect the increase in the CPI since July
1, 2012. The Agencies divided the
November 2015 CPI figure (237.336)—
the latest data from the Department of
Labor—by the July 2012 CPI figure
(229.104), and multiplied the product
(1.0359) by $5,000,000. The resulting
value is $5,179,656.40, which is the $5
million limit found in sections
771.117(c)(23)(i) and 771.118(c)(13)(i)
after adjusting for inflation, and should
be considered when applying the
limited Federal financial assistance CE
to projects during the 2016 calendar
year. Similarly, to determine the
inflation figure for subparagraph (ii)
under sections 771.117(c)(23) and
771.118(c)(13), the Agencies multiplied
1.0359 by $30,000,000 with the
following result: $31,077,938.44. These
figures ($5,179,656.40 and
$31,077,938.44) are posted on the
Agencies’ Web sites and will be updated
annually in January of subsequent years.
Posting these figures also complies with
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
34272
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 104 / Tuesday, May 31, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
section 1314(b)(1) which requires
providing the first adjustment ‘‘not later
than 60 days after the date of enactment
of [the FAST] Act.’’
Section 1315(b) requires FHWA to
revise its CE regulation on
programmatic agreements. Specifically,
FHWA must revise 23 CFR 771.117(g) to
allow a State Department of
Transportation (State DOT) to make a
CE determination on behalf of FHWA.
The revision must clarify that the
authority under such agreements may
include the responsibility to make CE
determinations for actions described in
23 CFR 771.117(c)–(d) that meet the
criteria for a CE under 40 CFR 1508.4
(the President’s Council on
Environmental Quality’s Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions
of NEPA) and are identified in the
programmatic agreement.
This rulemaking adopts the language
used in FAST Act section 1315(b) with
two minor changes to retain the style
used throughout the regulation: FHWA
uses the abbreviation ‘‘CE’’ instead of
‘‘categorical exclusion’’ and ‘‘40 CFR
1508.4’’ instead of the statutory
language of ‘‘section 1508.4 of title 40,
Code of Federal Regulations.’’ The rule
set forth below incorporates the new
phrase ‘‘and that meet the criteria for a
CE under 40 CFR 1508.4, and are
identified in the programmatic
agreement’’ into the otherwise existing
regulatory language in 23 CFR
771.117(g). The FHWA reprints below
the paragraph 771.117(g) to show how
the statutory language is incorporated
into the paragraph as a whole.
The Agencies have determined that a
final rule is appropriate in this instance
because the language in the FAST Act
is clear and does not require interpretive
text. Therefore the amendments to 23
CFR 771.117(c)(23), 23 CFR
771.118(c)(13), and 23 CFR 771.117(g)
follow the statutory language without
substantive modification.
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency may
waive the normal notice and comment
procedure if it finds, for good cause, that
it would be impracticable, unnecessary,
or contrary to the public interest. The
Agencies find good cause as notice and
comment for this rule would be
unnecessary due to the nature of the
revisions (i.e., the rule simply
incorporates the statutory language
found in sections 1315(b) and 1314 of
FAST without interpretation). The
statutory language does not require
regulatory interpretation to carry out its
intent. The regulatory amendments in
this final rule incorporate the statutory
language, and comments cannot alter
the regulation given the explicit
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 May 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
mandate. Accordingly, the Agencies
find good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B) to waive notice and
opportunity for comment.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review), and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The Agencies have determined this
action is not a significant regulatory
action within the meaning of Executive
Order 12866, and within the meaning of
the U.S. Department of Transportation’s
regulatory policies and procedures.
Since this rulemaking implements a
congressional mandate to allow States to
make a CE determination on behalf of
FHWA in specific instances and to
adjust existing monetary-based CEs for
inflation, the Agencies anticipate that
the economic impact of this rulemaking
would be minimal. This final rule will
not adversely affect, in a material way,
any sector of the economy.
Additionally, this action complies with
the principles of Executive Order 13563.
In addition, these changes will not
interfere with any action taken or
planned by another agency and would
not materially alter the budgetary
impact of any entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs. Consequently, a
full regulatory evaluation is not
required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since the Agencies find good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive
notice and opportunity for comment for
this rule, the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–
354, 5 U.S.C. 601–612) do not apply.
However, the Agencies evaluated the
effects of this action on small entities
and determined the action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This final rule will not make any
substantive changes to the Agencies’
regulations or in the way that the
Agencies’ regulations affect small
entities; it merely incorporates statutory
text. For this reason, the Agencies
certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule does not impose
unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4, 109 Stat. 48, March 22,
1995) as it will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
private sector, of $155 million or more
in any one year (2 U.S.C. 1532).
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism
Assessment)
Executive Order 13132 requires
agencies to assure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials
in the development of regulatory
policies that may have a substantial,
direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. This action has
been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132 dated August 4,
1999, and the Agencies determined this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect or sufficient federalism
implications on the States. The
Agencies also determined this action
will not preempt any State law or
regulation or affect the States’ ability to
discharge traditional State governmental
functions.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.),
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from the Office of Management and
Budget for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. The
Agencies analyzed this final rule under
the PRA and determined this rule does
not contain collection of information
requirements for the purposes of the
PRA.
National Environmental Policy Act
Agencies are required to adopt
implementing procedures for NEPA that
establish specific criteria for, and
identification of, three classes of
actions: Those that normally require
preparation of an Environmental Impact
Statement; those that normally require
preparation of an Environmental
Assessment; and those that are
categorically excluded from further
NEPA review (40 CFR 1507.3(b)). The
CEQ regulations do not direct agencies
to prepare a NEPA analysis or document
before establishing Agency procedures
(such as this regulation) that
supplement the CEQ regulations for
implementing NEPA. The changes
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 104 / Tuesday, May 31, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
proposed in this rule are part of those
agency procedures, and therefore
establishing the proposed changes does
not require preparation of a NEPA
analysis or document. Agency NEPA
procedures are generally procedural
guidance to assist agencies in the
fulfillment of agency responsibilities
under NEPA, but are not the agency’s
final determination of what level of
NEPA analysis is required for a
particular proposed action. The
requirements for establishing agency
NEPA procedures are set forth at 40 CFR
1505.1 and 1507.3.
Executive Order 12898 (Environmental
Justice)
Executive Order 12898, Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, and DOT
Order 5610.2(a), 77 FR 27534 (May 10,
2012) (available online at
www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/
environmental_justice/ej_at_dot/order_
56102a/index.cfm), require DOT
agencies to achieve environmental
justice (EJ) as part of their mission by
identifying and addressing, as
appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects, including
interrelated social and economic effects,
of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations and
low-income populations in the United
States. The DOT Order requires DOT
agencies to address compliance with the
Executive Order and the DOT Order in
all rulemaking activities. In addition,
the Agencies have issued additional
documents relating to administration of
the Executive Order and the DOT Order.
On June 14, 2012, FHWA issued an
update to its EJ order, FHWA Order
6640.23A, FHWA Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low Income
Populations (available online at
www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/
orders/664023a.cfm). The FTA also
issued an update to its EJ policy, FTA
Policy Guidance for Federal Transit
Recipients, 77 FR 42077 (July 17, 2012)
(available online at https://
www.fta.dot.gov/legislation_law/12349_
14740.html).
The Agencies have evaluated this
final rule under the Executive Order, the
DOT Order, the FHWA Order, and FTA
Policy Guidance. They determined that
the amendment would not cause
disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effects
on minority or low income populations.
At the time the Agencies apply the
NEPA implementing procedures in 23
CFR part 771, they would have an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 May 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
independent obligation to conduct an
evaluation of the proposed action under
the applicable EJ orders and guidance to
determine whether the proposed action
has the potential for EJ effects. The rule
would not affect the scope or outcome
of that EJ evaluation. In any instance
where there are potential EJ effects
resulting from a proposed Agency action
covered under any of the NEPA classes
of action in 23 CFR part 771, public
outreach under the applicable EJ orders
and guidance would provide affected
populations with the opportunity to
raise any concerns about those potential
EJ effects. See DOT Order 5610.2(a),
FHWA Order 6640.23A, and FTA Policy
Guidance for Transit Recipients
(available at links above). Indeed,
outreach to ensure the effective
involvement of minority and low
income populations where there is
potential for EJ effects is a core aspect
of the EJ orders and guidance. For these
reasons, the Agencies have determined
that no further EJ analysis is needed and
no mitigation is required in connection
with the proposed revisions to the
Agencies’ NEPA regulations (23 CFR
parts 771).
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
The Agencies have analyzed this final
rule under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference
with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights. The Agencies found this final
rule will not affect a taking of private
property or otherwise have taking
implications under Executive Order
12630.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This action meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
The Agencies analyzed this rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. The Agencies certify that this
action would not cause an
environmental risk to health or safety
that might disproportionately affect
children.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation)
The Agencies have analyzed this
action under Executive Order 13175,
dated November 6, 2000, and
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34273
determined the action will not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes; will not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian tribal governments; and will not
preempt tribal laws. This final rule
addresses obligations of Federal funds
to States for Federal-aid highway
projects and Federal funds to transit
agencies for Federal public
transportation projects and will not
impose any direct compliance
requirements on Indian tribal
governments. Therefore, a tribal
summary impact statement is not
required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
The Agencies have analyzed this
action under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The Agencies
determined this rule is not a significant
energy action under that order since it
is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number
(RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
Information Service Center publishes
the Unified Agenda in April and
October of each year. The RIN number
contained in the heading of this
document can be used to cross-reference
this action with the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects
23 CFR Part 771
Categorical exclusions, Environmental
review process, Environmental
protection, Grant programs—
transportation, Highways and roads,
Programmatic approaches, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 622
Categorical exclusions, Environmental
review process, Environmental
protection, Grant programs—
transportation, Public transportation,
Transit.
Issued on: May 20, 2016.
Gregory G. Nadeau,
Federal Highway Administrator.
Carolyn Flowers,
Acting Administrator, Federal Transit
Administration.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Agencies amend title 23, Code of
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
34274
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 104 / Tuesday, May 31, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Federal Regulations part 771, and title
49, Code of Federal Regulations part
662, as follows:
TITLE 23—Highways
PART 771—ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
AND RELATED PROCEDURES
1. Revise the authority citation for part
771 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; 23
U.S.C. 106, 109, 128, 138, 139, 315, 325, 326,
and 327; 49 U.S.C. 303; 40 CFR parts 1500–
1508; 49 CFR 1.81, 1.85, and 1.91; Pub. L.
109–59, 119 Stat. 1144, Sections 6002 and
6010; Pub. L. 112–141, 126 Stat. 405,
Sections 1315, 1316, 1317, 1318, and 1319;
Pub. L. 114–94, 129 Stat. 1312, Sections 1314
and 1315.
2. Revise § 771.117(c)(23) and (g)
introductory text to read as follows:
■
§ 771.117
FHWA categorical exclusions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(23) Federally-funded projects:
(i) That receive less than $5,000,000
(as adjusted annually by the Secretary to
reflect any increases in the Consumer
Price Index prepared by the Department
of Labor, see www.fhwa.dot.gov or
www.fta.dot.gov) of Federal funds; or
(ii) With a total estimated cost of not
more than $30,000,000 (as adjusted
annually by the Secretary to reflect any
increases in the Consumer Price Index
prepared by the Department of Labor,
see www.fhwa.dot.gov or
www.fta.dot.gov) and Federal funds
comprising less than 15 percent of the
total estimated project cost.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) FHWA may enter into
programmatic agreements with a State
to allow a State DOT to make a NEPA
CE certification or determination and
approval on FHWA’s behalf, for CEs
specifically listed in paragraphs (c) and
(d) of this section and that meet the
criteria for a CE under 40 CFR 1508.4,
and are identified in the programmatic
agreement. Such agreements must be
subject to the following conditions:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise § 771.118(c)(13) to read as
follows:
§ 771.118
FTA categorical exclusions.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(13) Federally-funded projects:
(i) That receive less than $5,000,000
(as adjusted annually by the Secretary to
reflect any increases in the Consumer
Price Index prepared by the Department
of Labor, see www.fhwa.dot.gov or
www.fta.dot.gov) of Federal funds; or
(ii) With a total estimated cost of not
more than $30,000,000 (as adjusted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 May 27, 2016
Jkt 238001
annually by the Secretary to reflect any
increases in the Consumer Price Index
prepared by the Department of Labor,
see www.fhwa.dot.gov or
www.fta.dot.gov) and Federal funds
comprising less than 15 percent of the
total estimated project cost.
*
*
*
*
*
TITLE 49—Transportation
PART 622—ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
AND RELATED PROCEDURES
4. Revise the authority citation for part
622 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; 49
U.S.C. 303 and 5323(q); 23 U.S.C. 139 and
326; Pub. L. 109–59, 119 Stat. 1144, Sections
6002 and 6010; 40 CFR parts 1500–1508; 49
CFR 1.81; Pub. L. 112–141, 126 Stat. 405,
Sections 1315, 1316, 1317, 1318, and 1319;
and Pub. L. 114–94, 129 Stat. 1312, Section
1314.
[FR Doc. 2016–12577 Filed 5–27–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
30 CFR Part 556
[Docket ID: BOEM–2016–0031]
RIN 1010–AD06
Leasing of Sulfur or Oil and Gas in the
Outer Continental Shelf; Correction
MMAA104000
Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management (BOEM), Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
On March 30, 2016, the
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
(BOEM) published in the Federal
Register a final rule that updates and
streamlines the Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS) oil and gas and sulfur leasing
regulations, which will become effective
on May 31, 2016 (81 FR 18111)
(‘‘Leasing Rule’’). One of the regulations
contained in the final rule was
incorrectly stated. This document
corrects that error
DATES: This correction is effective on
May 31, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Sebastian, Office of Policy,
Regulation and Analysis at (504) 736–
2761 or email at robert.sebastian@
boem.gov.
SUMMARY:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Need for Correction
BOEM has the authority, under
certain conditions, to disqualify a party
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
from acquiring a lease or an interest in
a lease on the Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS). The title, as well as the verbiage,
of § 556.403 in the final Leasing Rule,
states that BOEM may disqualify entities
from ‘‘holding,’’ a lease or lease interest
on the OCS. This could be interpreted
to imply that BOEM would not allow a
disqualified party to retain a preexisting OCS lease interest. That
interpretation is incorrect. Disqualified
entities may not acquire new leases or
lease interests, but they may continue to
hold existing leases or lease interests.
BOEM is correcting the wording of
§ 556.403 to avoid the implication that
the use of the word ‘‘hold’’ might
authorize BOEM, under the conditions
stated in § 556.403, to require forfeiture
of leases already acquired. The final rule
was issued under Docket ID: MMS–
2007–OMM–0069, which has expired
and is no longer accessible. Therefore,
BOEM is utilizing a new Docket ID for
this correction (BOEM–2016–0031).
Procedural Requirements
Section V, Legal and Regulatory
Analyses, of the final rule issued on
March 30, 2016 (81 FR 18145),
summarizes BOEM’s analyses of that
rule pursuant to applicable statutes and
executive orders. This amendment does
not change the conclusions described in
that section because the amendment
conforms the regulatory text to BOEM’s
intent in the final rule, as then analyzed.
Therefore, no additional analysis is
necessary.
The Administrative Procedure Act, 5
U.S.C. 553(b), provides that, when an
agency for good cause finds that ‘‘notice
and public procedure . . . are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest,’’ the agency may
issue a rule without providing notice
and an opportunity for prior public
comment. To the extent this rule has
substantive effects, it is to relieve
regulated parties from sanctions. It does
not require any party to change its
conduct, and it does not change the
rights of any party affected by the final
rule. Therefore, BOEM believes that the
public would not be interested in
commenting on this correction, and thus
notice and comment are unnecessary.
Moreover, if BOEM were to first publish
a proposed rule, allow the public
sufficient time to submit comments,
analyze the comments, and then publish
a final rule, it would not be possible to
correct this error and make it effective
on the same day as the earlier final rule,
May 31, 2016. Accordingly, notice and
comment is impracticable. For these
reasons, BOEM finds that soliciting
public comment is unnecessary and
impracticable and that there is good
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 31, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34271-34274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12577]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 771
Federal Transit Administration
49 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. FHWA-2016-0008]
RIN 2125-AF69; 2132-AB29
Categorical Exclusions
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit
Administration (FTA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends FHWA and FTA categorical exclusions
(CE) for projects receiving limited Federal assistance to reflect a
requirement in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act
to index for inflation the monetary thresholds for these CEs. This
final rule also implements a provision in the FAST Act that directs
FHWA to amend its rules on programmatic agreements for CEs. The
amendments contained in this rule reflect statutory language in the
FAST Act.
DATES: Effective on June 30, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For the Federal Highway
Administration: Owen Lindauer, Ph.D., Office of Project Delivery and
Environmental Review, HEPE, (202) 366-2655, Owen.Lindauer@dot.gov, or
Jennifer Mayo, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-1523,
Jennifer.Mayo@dot.gov. For FTA: Megan Blum, Office of Planning and
Environment, (202) 366-0463, Megan.Blum@dot.gov, or Nancy-Ellen Zusman,
Office of Chief Counsel, (312) 353-2577, NancyEllen.Zusman@dot.gov. The
FHWA and FTA are both located at 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., Washington,
DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. E.T.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access and Filing
This document may be viewed online through the Federal eRulemaking
portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Retrieval help and guidelines are
available on the Web site. It is available 24 hours each day, 365 days
a year. An electronic copy of this document may also be downloaded from
the Office of the Federal Register home page at: https://www.ofr.gov and
the Government Printing Office Web page at: https://www.gpo.gov.
Background
On December 4, 2015, President Obama signed into law the FAST Act,
Public Law 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312, which contains new requirements that
FHWA and FTA (hereafter referred to as ``the Agencies'') must meet in
complying with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.). Section 1314(a) of the FAST Act amends section 1317 of
the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21), Public
Law 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, by inserting ``(as adjusted annually by the
Secretary to reflect any increases in the Consumer Price Index prepared
by the Department of Labor)'' after ``$5,000,000'' in paragraph (1)(A)
and after ``$30,000,000'' in paragraph (1)(B) of the CE for projects
receiving limited Federal financial assistance. The Agencies relied on
the authority in MAP-21, section 1317 to establish limited Federal
financial assistance CEs for FHWA at 23 CFR 771.117(c)(23) and for FTA
at 23 CFR 771.118(c)(13). Those CEs were published in a final rule in
the Federal Register on January 13, 2014 (79 FR 2107). With this final
rule, the Agencies are amending the limited Federal financial
assistance CEs to incorporate the adjustment for inflation requirement
created by the FAST Act.
The Agencies included a reference to their respective Web sites
(www.fhwa.dot.gov and www.fta.dot.gov) in the CE language in order to
provide a source for locating the consumer price index (CPI), as
adjusted annually. Per the FAST Act, section 1314(b), the first
adjustment made pursuant to section 1314(a) must reflect the increase
in the CPI since July 1, 2012. The Agencies divided the November 2015
CPI figure (237.336)--the latest data from the Department of Labor--by
the July 2012 CPI figure (229.104), and multiplied the product (1.0359)
by $5,000,000. The resulting value is $5,179,656.40, which is the $5
million limit found in sections 771.117(c)(23)(i) and 771.118(c)(13)(i)
after adjusting for inflation, and should be considered when applying
the limited Federal financial assistance CE to projects during the 2016
calendar year. Similarly, to determine the inflation figure for
subparagraph (ii) under sections 771.117(c)(23) and 771.118(c)(13), the
Agencies multiplied 1.0359 by $30,000,000 with the following result:
$31,077,938.44. These figures ($5,179,656.40 and $31,077,938.44) are
posted on the Agencies' Web sites and will be updated annually in
January of subsequent years. Posting these figures also complies with
[[Page 34272]]
section 1314(b)(1) which requires providing the first adjustment ``not
later than 60 days after the date of enactment of [the FAST] Act.''
Section 1315(b) requires FHWA to revise its CE regulation on
programmatic agreements. Specifically, FHWA must revise 23 CFR
771.117(g) to allow a State Department of Transportation (State DOT) to
make a CE determination on behalf of FHWA. The revision must clarify
that the authority under such agreements may include the responsibility
to make CE determinations for actions described in 23 CFR 771.117(c)-
(d) that meet the criteria for a CE under 40 CFR 1508.4 (the
President's Council on Environmental Quality's Regulations for
Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA) and are identified in
the programmatic agreement.
This rulemaking adopts the language used in FAST Act section
1315(b) with two minor changes to retain the style used throughout the
regulation: FHWA uses the abbreviation ``CE'' instead of ``categorical
exclusion'' and ``40 CFR 1508.4'' instead of the statutory language of
``section 1508.4 of title 40, Code of Federal Regulations.'' The rule
set forth below incorporates the new phrase ``and that meet the
criteria for a CE under 40 CFR 1508.4, and are identified in the
programmatic agreement'' into the otherwise existing regulatory
language in 23 CFR 771.117(g). The FHWA reprints below the paragraph
771.117(g) to show how the statutory language is incorporated into the
paragraph as a whole.
The Agencies have determined that a final rule is appropriate in
this instance because the language in the FAST Act is clear and does
not require interpretive text. Therefore the amendments to 23 CFR
771.117(c)(23), 23 CFR 771.118(c)(13), and 23 CFR 771.117(g) follow the
statutory language without substantive modification.
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency
may waive the normal notice and comment procedure if it finds, for good
cause, that it would be impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest. The Agencies find good cause as notice and comment for
this rule would be unnecessary due to the nature of the revisions
(i.e., the rule simply incorporates the statutory language found in
sections 1315(b) and 1314 of FAST without interpretation). The
statutory language does not require regulatory interpretation to carry
out its intent. The regulatory amendments in this final rule
incorporate the statutory language, and comments cannot alter the
regulation given the explicit mandate. Accordingly, the Agencies find
good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive notice and opportunity
for comment.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notices
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures
The Agencies have determined this action is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Order 12866, and
within the meaning of the U.S. Department of Transportation's
regulatory policies and procedures. Since this rulemaking implements a
congressional mandate to allow States to make a CE determination on
behalf of FHWA in specific instances and to adjust existing monetary-
based CEs for inflation, the Agencies anticipate that the economic
impact of this rulemaking would be minimal. This final rule will not
adversely affect, in a material way, any sector of the economy.
Additionally, this action complies with the principles of Executive
Order 13563. In addition, these changes will not interfere with any
action taken or planned by another agency and would not materially
alter the budgetary impact of any entitlements, grants, user fees, or
loan programs. Consequently, a full regulatory evaluation is not
required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since the Agencies find good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to
waive notice and opportunity for comment for this rule, the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354, 5 U.S.C. 601-612) do
not apply. However, the Agencies evaluated the effects of this action
on small entities and determined the action would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This final rule will not make any substantive changes to the Agencies'
regulations or in the way that the Agencies' regulations affect small
entities; it merely incorporates statutory text. For this reason, the
Agencies certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule does not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4, 109 Stat. 48,
March 22, 1995) as it will not result in the expenditure by State,
local, tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $155 million or more in any one year (2 U.S.C. 1532).
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism Assessment)
Executive Order 13132 requires agencies to assure meaningful and
timely input by State and local officials in the development of
regulatory policies that may have a substantial, direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. This action has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive
Order 13132 dated August 4, 1999, and the Agencies determined this
action will not have a substantial direct effect or sufficient
federalism implications on the States. The Agencies also determined
this action will not preempt any State law or regulation or affect the
States' ability to discharge traditional State governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply
to this program.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et
seq.), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget for each collection of information they conduct,
sponsor, or require through regulations. The Agencies analyzed this
final rule under the PRA and determined this rule does not contain
collection of information requirements for the purposes of the PRA.
National Environmental Policy Act
Agencies are required to adopt implementing procedures for NEPA
that establish specific criteria for, and identification of, three
classes of actions: Those that normally require preparation of an
Environmental Impact Statement; those that normally require preparation
of an Environmental Assessment; and those that are categorically
excluded from further NEPA review (40 CFR 1507.3(b)). The CEQ
regulations do not direct agencies to prepare a NEPA analysis or
document before establishing Agency procedures (such as this
regulation) that supplement the CEQ regulations for implementing NEPA.
The changes
[[Page 34273]]
proposed in this rule are part of those agency procedures, and
therefore establishing the proposed changes does not require
preparation of a NEPA analysis or document. Agency NEPA procedures are
generally procedural guidance to assist agencies in the fulfillment of
agency responsibilities under NEPA, but are not the agency's final
determination of what level of NEPA analysis is required for a
particular proposed action. The requirements for establishing agency
NEPA procedures are set forth at 40 CFR 1505.1 and 1507.3.
Executive Order 12898 (Environmental Justice)
Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, and DOT
Order 5610.2(a), 77 FR 27534 (May 10, 2012) (available online at
www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/environmental_justice/ej_at_dot/order_56102a/index.cfm), require DOT agencies to achieve environmental
justice (EJ) as part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as
appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects, including interrelated social and economic
effects, of their programs, policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income populations in the United States. The DOT
Order requires DOT agencies to address compliance with the Executive
Order and the DOT Order in all rulemaking activities. In addition, the
Agencies have issued additional documents relating to administration of
the Executive Order and the DOT Order. On June 14, 2012, FHWA issued an
update to its EJ order, FHWA Order 6640.23A, FHWA Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low Income
Populations (available online at www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/orders/664023a.cfm). The FTA also issued an update to its EJ policy,
FTA Policy Guidance for Federal Transit Recipients, 77 FR 42077 (July
17, 2012) (available online at https://www.fta.dot.gov/legislation_law/12349_14740.html).
The Agencies have evaluated this final rule under the Executive
Order, the DOT Order, the FHWA Order, and FTA Policy Guidance. They
determined that the amendment would not cause disproportionately high
and adverse human health and environmental effects on minority or low
income populations.
At the time the Agencies apply the NEPA implementing procedures in
23 CFR part 771, they would have an independent obligation to conduct
an evaluation of the proposed action under the applicable EJ orders and
guidance to determine whether the proposed action has the potential for
EJ effects. The rule would not affect the scope or outcome of that EJ
evaluation. In any instance where there are potential EJ effects
resulting from a proposed Agency action covered under any of the NEPA
classes of action in 23 CFR part 771, public outreach under the
applicable EJ orders and guidance would provide affected populations
with the opportunity to raise any concerns about those potential EJ
effects. See DOT Order 5610.2(a), FHWA Order 6640.23A, and FTA Policy
Guidance for Transit Recipients (available at links above). Indeed,
outreach to ensure the effective involvement of minority and low income
populations where there is potential for EJ effects is a core aspect of
the EJ orders and guidance. For these reasons, the Agencies have
determined that no further EJ analysis is needed and no mitigation is
required in connection with the proposed revisions to the Agencies'
NEPA regulations (23 CFR parts 771).
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
The Agencies have analyzed this final rule under Executive Order
12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights. The Agencies found this final rule will not
affect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking
implications under Executive Order 12630.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This action meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
The Agencies analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. The Agencies certify that this action would not cause an
environmental risk to health or safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)
The Agencies have analyzed this action under Executive Order 13175,
dated November 6, 2000, and determined the action will not have
substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes; will not
impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal
governments; and will not preempt tribal laws. This final rule
addresses obligations of Federal funds to States for Federal-aid
highway projects and Federal funds to transit agencies for Federal
public transportation projects and will not impose any direct
compliance requirements on Indian tribal governments. Therefore, a
tribal summary impact statement is not required.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
The Agencies have analyzed this action under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. The Agencies determined this rule is not a
significant energy action under that order since it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations.
The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda
in April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the
heading of this document can be used to cross-reference this action
with the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects
23 CFR Part 771
Categorical exclusions, Environmental review process, Environmental
protection, Grant programs--transportation, Highways and roads,
Programmatic approaches, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 622
Categorical exclusions, Environmental review process, Environmental
protection, Grant programs--transportation, Public transportation,
Transit.
Issued on: May 20, 2016.
Gregory G. Nadeau,
Federal Highway Administrator.
Carolyn Flowers,
Acting Administrator, Federal Transit Administration.
In consideration of the foregoing, the Agencies amend title 23,
Code of
[[Page 34274]]
Federal Regulations part 771, and title 49, Code of Federal Regulations
part 662, as follows:
TITLE 23--Highways
PART 771--ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND RELATED PROCEDURES
0
1. Revise the authority citation for part 771 to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; 23 U.S.C. 106, 109, 128,
138, 139, 315, 325, 326, and 327; 49 U.S.C. 303; 40 CFR parts 1500-
1508; 49 CFR 1.81, 1.85, and 1.91; Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144,
Sections 6002 and 6010; Pub. L. 112-141, 126 Stat. 405, Sections
1315, 1316, 1317, 1318, and 1319; Pub. L. 114-94, 129 Stat. 1312,
Sections 1314 and 1315.
0
2. Revise Sec. 771.117(c)(23) and (g) introductory text to read as
follows:
Sec. 771.117 FHWA categorical exclusions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(23) Federally-funded projects:
(i) That receive less than $5,000,000 (as adjusted annually by the
Secretary to reflect any increases in the Consumer Price Index prepared
by the Department of Labor, see www.fhwa.dot.gov or www.fta.dot.gov) of
Federal funds; or
(ii) With a total estimated cost of not more than $30,000,000 (as
adjusted annually by the Secretary to reflect any increases in the
Consumer Price Index prepared by the Department of Labor, see
www.fhwa.dot.gov or www.fta.dot.gov) and Federal funds comprising less
than 15 percent of the total estimated project cost.
* * * * *
(g) FHWA may enter into programmatic agreements with a State to
allow a State DOT to make a NEPA CE certification or determination and
approval on FHWA's behalf, for CEs specifically listed in paragraphs
(c) and (d) of this section and that meet the criteria for a CE under
40 CFR 1508.4, and are identified in the programmatic agreement. Such
agreements must be subject to the following conditions:
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Sec. 771.118(c)(13) to read as follows:
Sec. 771.118 FTA categorical exclusions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(13) Federally-funded projects:
(i) That receive less than $5,000,000 (as adjusted annually by the
Secretary to reflect any increases in the Consumer Price Index prepared
by the Department of Labor, see www.fhwa.dot.gov or www.fta.dot.gov) of
Federal funds; or
(ii) With a total estimated cost of not more than $30,000,000 (as
adjusted annually by the Secretary to reflect any increases in the
Consumer Price Index prepared by the Department of Labor, see
www.fhwa.dot.gov or www.fta.dot.gov) and Federal funds comprising less
than 15 percent of the total estimated project cost.
* * * * *
TITLE 49--Transportation
PART 622--ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND RELATED PROCEDURES
0
4. Revise the authority citation for part 622 to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.; 49 U.S.C. 303 and 5323(q);
23 U.S.C. 139 and 326; Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144, Sections 6002
and 6010; 40 CFR parts 1500-1508; 49 CFR 1.81; Pub. L. 112-141, 126
Stat. 405, Sections 1315, 1316, 1317, 1318, and 1319; and Pub. L.
114-94, 129 Stat. 1312, Section 1314.
[FR Doc. 2016-12577 Filed 5-27-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P