Availability of Data on Allocations of Cross-State Air Pollution Rule Allowances From New Unit Set-Asides for the 2016 Compliance Year, 33636-33637 [2016-12485]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
33636
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2016 / Proposed Rules
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). However,
consistent with EPA policy, the EPA
provided a consultation opportunity to
the Spokane Tribe in a letter dated
September 11, 2015. The EPA did not
receive a request for consultation.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, and
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 13, 2016.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
[FR Doc. 2016–12529 Filed 5–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 97
[FRL–9947–02–OAR]
Availability of Data on Allocations of
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
Allowances From New Unit Set-Asides
for the 2016 Compliance Year
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of data
availability (NODA).
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is providing notice of the
availability of preliminary calculations
of emission allowance allocations to
certain units under the Cross-State Air
Pollution Rule (CSAPR). Under the
CSAPR federal implementation plans
(FIPs), portions of each covered state’s
annual emissions budgets for each of the
four CSAPR emissions trading programs
are reserved for allocation to electricity
generating units that commenced
commercial operation on or after
January 1, 2010 (new units) and certain
other units not otherwise obtaining
allowance allocations under the FIPs.
The quantities of allowances allocated
to eligible units from each new unit setaside (NUSA) under the FIPs are
calculated in an annual one- or tworound allocation process. EPA has
completed preliminary calculations for
the first round of NUSA allowance
allocations for the 2016 compliance year
and has posted spreadsheets containing
the calculations on EPA’s Web site. EPA
will consider timely objections to the
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 May 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
preliminary calculations (including
objections concerning the identification
of units eligible for allocations) and will
promulgate a notice responding to any
such objections no later than August 1,
2016, the deadline for recording the
first-round allocations in sources’
Allowance Management System
accounts. This notice may concern
CSAPR-affected units in the following
states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida,
Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland,
Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi,
Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New
York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina,
Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West
Virginia, and Wisconsin.
DATES: Objections to the information
referenced in this notice must be
received on or before June 27, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your objections via
email to CSAPR_NUSA@epa.gov.
Include ‘‘2016 NUSA allocations’’ in the
email subject line and include your
name, title, affiliation, address, phone
number, and email address in the body
of the email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions concerning this action should
be addressed to Robert Miller at (202)
343–9077 or miller.robertl@epa.gov or
Kenon Smith at (202) 343–9164 or
smith.kenon@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
CSAPR FIPs, the mechanisms by which
initial allocations of emission
allowances are determined differ for
‘‘existing’’ and ‘‘new’’ units. For
‘‘existing’’ units—that is, units
commencing commercial operation
before January 1, 2010—the specific
amounts of CSAPR FIP allowance
allocations for all compliance years
have been established through
rulemaking. EPA has announced the
availability of spreadsheets showing the
CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to
existing units in previous notices.1
‘‘New’’ units—that is, units
commencing commercial operation on
or after January 1, 2010—as well as
certain older units that would not
otherwise obtain FIP allowance
allocations do not have pre-established
allowance allocations. Instead, the
CSAPR FIPs reserve a portion of each
state’s total annual emissions budget for
1 The latest spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP allowance
allocations to existing units, updated in 2014 to
reflect changes to CSAPR’s implementation
schedule but with allocation amounts unchanged
since June 2012, is available at https://
www3.epa.gov/crossstaterule/actions.html. See
Availability of Data on Allocations of Cross-State
Air Pollution Rule Allowances to Existing
Electricity Generating Units, 79 FR 71674
(December 3, 2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
each CSAPR emissions trading program
as a new unit set-aside (NUSA) 2 and
establish an annual process for
allocating NUSA allowances to eligible
units. States with Indian country within
their borders have separate Indian
country NUSAs. The annual process for
allocating allowances from the NUSAs
and Indian country NUSAs to eligible
units is set forth in the CSAPR
regulations at 40 CFR 97.411(b) and
97.412 (NOX Annual Trading Program),
97.511(b) and 97.512 (NOX Ozone
Season Trading Program), 97.611(b) and
97.612 (SO2 Group 1 Trading Program),
and 97.711(b) and 97.712 (SO2 Group 2
Trading Program). Each NUSA
allowance allocation process involves
up to two rounds of allocations to new
units followed by the allocation to
existing units of any allowances not
allocated to new units. EPA provides
public notice at certain points in the
process. This notice concerns
preliminary calculations for the first
round of NUSA allowance allocations
for the 2016 compliance year.3
The units eligible to receive firstround NUSA allocations are defined in
§§ 97.412(a)(1), 97.512(a)(1),
97.612(a)(1), and 97.712(a)(1).
Generally, eligible units include any
CSAPR-affected unit that has not been
allocated allowances as an existing unit
as well as certain units that have been
allocated allowances as existing units
but whose allocations have been
deducted or not recorded because of
corrections or multi-year breaks in
operations. EPA notes that a valid
allowance allocation may consist of zero
allowances; thus, an existing unit
specifically allocated zero allowances in
the spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP
allowance allocations to existing units is
generally ineligible to receive a NUSA
allowance allocation.
The quantity of allowances to be
allocated through the 2016 NUSA
allowance allocation process for each
state and emissions trading program is
generally the state’s 2016 emissions
budget less the sum of (1) the total of the
2016 CSAPR FIP allowance allocations
to existing units and (2) the amount of
the 2016 Indian country NUSA, if any.4
2 The NUSA amounts range from two percent to
eight percent of the respective state budgets. The
variation in percentages reflects differences among
states in the quantities of emission allowances
projected to be required by known new units at the
time the budgets were set or amended.
3 At this time, EPA is not aware of any unit
eligible for a first-round allocation from any Indian
country NUSA.
4 The quantities of allowances to be allocated
through the NUSA allowance allocation process
may differ slightly from the NUSA amounts set
forth in §§ 97.410(a), 97.510(a), 97.610(a), and
E:\FR\FM\27MYP1.SGM
27MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 103 / Friday, May 27, 2016 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The amounts of NUSA allowances may
be increased in certain circumstances as
set forth in §§ 97.412(a)(2), 97.512(a)(2),
97.612(a)(2), and 97.712(a)(2).
The amounts of first-round allocations
to eligible units from each NUSA are
calculated according to the procedures
set forth in §§ 97.412(a)(3)–(7) and (12),
97.512(a)(3)–(7) and (12), 97.612(a)(3)–
(7) and (12), and 97.712(a)(3)–(7) and
(12). Generally, the procedures call for
each eligible unit to receive a first-round
2016 NUSA allocation equal to its 2015
emissions as reported under 40 CFR part
75 unless the total of such allocations to
all eligible units would exceed the
amount of allowances in the NUSA, in
which case the allocations are reduced
on a pro-rata basis.5
EPA notes that an allocation or lack
of allocation of allowances to a given
EGU does not constitute a determination
that CSAPR does or does not apply to
the EGU. EPA also notes that allocations
are subject to potential correction.
The detailed unit-by-unit data and
preliminary allowance allocation
calculations are set forth in Excel
spreadsheets titled
‘‘CSAPR_NUSA_2016_NOX_Annual_1st
_Round_Prelim_Data’’, ‘‘CSAPR_
NUSA_2016_NOX_OS_1st_Round
_Prelim_Data’’, and ‘‘CSAPR_
NUSA_2016_SO2_1st_Round_Prelim
_Data,’’ available on EPA’s Web site at
https://www3.epa.gov/crossstaterule/
actions.html. The three spreadsheets
show EPA’s initial determinations of
2016 NUSA allocations for new units
subject to the CSAPR NOX Annual, NOX
Ozone Season, and SO2 (Group 1 and
Group 2) trading programs, respectively.
Each of the spreadsheets contains a
separate worksheet for each state
covered by that program showing, for
each unit identified as eligible for a
first-round NUSA allocation, (1) the
97.710(a) because of rounding in the spreadsheet of
CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing units.
5 Subsequent allocations of any allowances
remaining in any 2016 NUSA after first-round
allocations will be addressed in future notices. Any
such allocations will be made according to the
procedures set forth in §§ 97.412(a)(9), (10) and
(12), 97.512(a)(9), (10) and (12), 97.612(a)(9), (10)
and (12), and 97.712(a)(9), (10) and (12). Generally,
new units that commenced commercial operations
in 2015 or 2016 will receive second-round 2016
NUSA allocations sufficient to bring the totals of
their first- and second-round allocations up to their
2016 emissions as reported under 40 CFR part 75
unless the total of such second-round allocations
for all eligible units would exceed the remaining
amount of allowances in the NUSA, in which case
the second-round allocations will be reduced on a
pro-rata basis. Any allowances remaining in any
NUSA after second-round allocations to new
units—along with any allowances remaining in any
corresponding Indian country NUSA—will be
allocated to the state’s existing units in proportion
to their respective 2016 CSAPR FIP allocations of
non-NUSA allowances.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:22 May 26, 2016
Jkt 238001
unit’s emissions in the 2015 control
period (annual or ozone season as
applicable), (2) the maximum firstround 2016 NUSA allowance allocation
for which the unit is eligible (typically
the unit’s emissions in the 2015 control
period), (3) various adjustments to the
unit’s maximum allocation, many of
which are necessary only if the NUSA
pool is oversubscribed, and (4) the
preliminary calculation of the unit’s
first-round 2016 NUSA allowance
allocation.
Each state worksheet also contains a
summary showing (1) the quantity of
allowances initially available in that
state’s 2016 NUSA, (2) the sum of the
first-round 2016 NUSA allowance
allocations that will be made to new
units in that state, assuming there are no
corrections to the data, and (3) the
quantity of allowances that would
remain in the 2016 NUSA for use in
second-round allocations to new units
(or ultimately for allocation to existing
units), again assuming there are no
corrections to the data.
Objections should be strictly limited
to the data and calculations upon which
the NUSA allowance allocations are
based and should be emailed to the
address identified in ADDRESSES.
Objections must include: (1) Precise
identification of the specific data and or
calculations the commenter believes are
inaccurate, (2) new proposed data and
or calculations upon which the
commenter believes EPA should rely
instead to determine allowance
allocations, and (3) the reasons why
EPA should rely on the commenter’s
proposed data and or calculations and
not the data referenced in this notice.
Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.511(b),
97.611(b), and 97.711(b).
Dated: May 19, 2016.
Reid P. Harvey,
Director, Clean Air Markets Division, Office
of Atmospheric Programs, Office of Air and
Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2016–12485 Filed 5–26–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
46 CFR Parts 502, 503, 515, 520, 530,
535, 540, 550, 555, and 560
[Docket No. 16–06]
RIN 3072–AC34
Update of Existing and Addition of
New User Fees
Federal Maritime Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
33637
The Federal Maritime
Commission (Commission) proposes
amending its current user fees and
invites public comment on whether the
Commission should amend its user fees.
Specifically, the Commission proposes
increasing fees for: Filing complaints
and certain petitions; records searches,
document copying, and admissions to
practice; paper filing of ocean
transportation intermediary (OTI)
applications; filing applications for
special permission; and filing
agreements.
The Commission also proposes
lowering fees for: Reviewing Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) requests;
revising clerical errors on service
contracts; Revising clerical errors on
non-vessel-operating common carrier
(NVOCC) service agreements; and
Commission services to passenger vessel
operators (PVOs).
In addition, the Commission proposes
repealing four existing fees for: Adding
interested parties to a specific docket
mailing list; the Regulated Persons
Index database; database reports on
Effective Carrier Agreements; and filing
petitions for rulemaking. The
Commission also proposes adding a new
fee for requests for expedited review of
an agreement filing.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
June 27, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by the docket number in the
heading of this document, by any of the
following methods:
• Email: secretary@fmc.gov. Include
in the subject line: ‘‘Docket No. 16–06,
Comments on ‘‘Update of User Fees.’’
Comments should be attached to the
email as a Microsoft Word or textsearchable PDF document. Comments
containing confidential information
should not be submitted by email.
• Mail: Karen V. Gregory, Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission, 800
North Capitol Street NW., Washington,
DC 20573–0001. Phone: (202) 523–5725.
Email: secretary@fmc.gov.
• Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://
www.fmc.gov/16-06.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen V. Gregory, Secretary, Federal
Maritime Commission, 800 North
Capitol Street NW., Washington, DC
20573–0001. Phone: (202) 523–5725.
Email: secretary@fmc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission’s current user fees are
based on an assessment of fiscal year
2004 costs and have not been updated
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27MYP1.SGM
27MYP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33636-33637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12485]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 97
[FRL-9947-02-OAR]
Availability of Data on Allocations of Cross-State Air Pollution
Rule Allowances From New Unit Set-Asides for the 2016 Compliance Year
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of data availability (NODA).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is providing notice
of the availability of preliminary calculations of emission allowance
allocations to certain units under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
(CSAPR). Under the CSAPR federal implementation plans (FIPs), portions
of each covered state's annual emissions budgets for each of the four
CSAPR emissions trading programs are reserved for allocation to
electricity generating units that commenced commercial operation on or
after January 1, 2010 (new units) and certain other units not otherwise
obtaining allowance allocations under the FIPs. The quantities of
allowances allocated to eligible units from each new unit set-aside
(NUSA) under the FIPs are calculated in an annual one- or two-round
allocation process. EPA has completed preliminary calculations for the
first round of NUSA allowance allocations for the 2016 compliance year
and has posted spreadsheets containing the calculations on EPA's Web
site. EPA will consider timely objections to the preliminary
calculations (including objections concerning the identification of
units eligible for allocations) and will promulgate a notice responding
to any such objections no later than August 1, 2016, the deadline for
recording the first-round allocations in sources' Allowance Management
System accounts. This notice may concern CSAPR-affected units in the
following states: Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan,
Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
DATES: Objections to the information referenced in this notice must be
received on or before June 27, 2016.
ADDRESSES: Submit your objections via email to CSAPR_NUSA@epa.gov.
Include ``2016 NUSA allocations'' in the email subject line and include
your name, title, affiliation, address, phone number, and email address
in the body of the email.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning this action
should be addressed to Robert Miller at (202) 343-9077 or
miller.robertl@epa.gov or Kenon Smith at (202) 343-9164 or
smith.kenon@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the CSAPR FIPs, the mechanisms by
which initial allocations of emission allowances are determined differ
for ``existing'' and ``new'' units. For ``existing'' units--that is,
units commencing commercial operation before January 1, 2010--the
specific amounts of CSAPR FIP allowance allocations for all compliance
years have been established through rulemaking. EPA has announced the
availability of spreadsheets showing the CSAPR FIP allowance
allocations to existing units in previous notices.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The latest spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to
existing units, updated in 2014 to reflect changes to CSAPR's
implementation schedule but with allocation amounts unchanged since
June 2012, is available at https://www3.epa.gov/crossstaterule/actions.html. See Availability of Data on Allocations of Cross-State
Air Pollution Rule Allowances to Existing Electricity Generating
Units, 79 FR 71674 (December 3, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
``New'' units--that is, units commencing commercial operation on or
after January 1, 2010--as well as certain older units that would not
otherwise obtain FIP allowance allocations do not have pre-established
allowance allocations. Instead, the CSAPR FIPs reserve a portion of
each state's total annual emissions budget for each CSAPR emissions
trading program as a new unit set-aside (NUSA) \2\ and establish an
annual process for allocating NUSA allowances to eligible units. States
with Indian country within their borders have separate Indian country
NUSAs. The annual process for allocating allowances from the NUSAs and
Indian country NUSAs to eligible units is set forth in the CSAPR
regulations at 40 CFR 97.411(b) and 97.412 (NOX Annual
Trading Program), 97.511(b) and 97.512 (NOX Ozone Season
Trading Program), 97.611(b) and 97.612 (SO2 Group 1 Trading
Program), and 97.711(b) and 97.712 (SO2 Group 2 Trading
Program). Each NUSA allowance allocation process involves up to two
rounds of allocations to new units followed by the allocation to
existing units of any allowances not allocated to new units. EPA
provides public notice at certain points in the process. This notice
concerns preliminary calculations for the first round of NUSA allowance
allocations for the 2016 compliance year.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The NUSA amounts range from two percent to eight percent of
the respective state budgets. The variation in percentages reflects
differences among states in the quantities of emission allowances
projected to be required by known new units at the time the budgets
were set or amended.
\3\ At this time, EPA is not aware of any unit eligible for a
first-round allocation from any Indian country NUSA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The units eligible to receive first-round NUSA allocations are
defined in Sec. Sec. 97.412(a)(1), 97.512(a)(1), 97.612(a)(1), and
97.712(a)(1). Generally, eligible units include any CSAPR-affected unit
that has not been allocated allowances as an existing unit as well as
certain units that have been allocated allowances as existing units but
whose allocations have been deducted or not recorded because of
corrections or multi-year breaks in operations. EPA notes that a valid
allowance allocation may consist of zero allowances; thus, an existing
unit specifically allocated zero allowances in the spreadsheet of CSAPR
FIP allowance allocations to existing units is generally ineligible to
receive a NUSA allowance allocation.
The quantity of allowances to be allocated through the 2016 NUSA
allowance allocation process for each state and emissions trading
program is generally the state's 2016 emissions budget less the sum of
(1) the total of the 2016 CSAPR FIP allowance allocations to existing
units and (2) the amount of the 2016 Indian country NUSA, if any.\4\
[[Page 33637]]
The amounts of NUSA allowances may be increased in certain
circumstances as set forth in Sec. Sec. 97.412(a)(2), 97.512(a)(2),
97.612(a)(2), and 97.712(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The quantities of allowances to be allocated through the
NUSA allowance allocation process may differ slightly from the NUSA
amounts set forth in Sec. Sec. 97.410(a), 97.510(a), 97.610(a), and
97.710(a) because of rounding in the spreadsheet of CSAPR FIP
allowance allocations to existing units.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The amounts of first-round allocations to eligible units from each
NUSA are calculated according to the procedures set forth in Sec. Sec.
97.412(a)(3)-(7) and (12), 97.512(a)(3)-(7) and (12), 97.612(a)(3)-(7)
and (12), and 97.712(a)(3)-(7) and (12). Generally, the procedures call
for each eligible unit to receive a first-round 2016 NUSA allocation
equal to its 2015 emissions as reported under 40 CFR part 75 unless the
total of such allocations to all eligible units would exceed the amount
of allowances in the NUSA, in which case the allocations are reduced on
a pro-rata basis.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Subsequent allocations of any allowances remaining in any
2016 NUSA after first-round allocations will be addressed in future
notices. Any such allocations will be made according to the
procedures set forth in Sec. Sec. 97.412(a)(9), (10) and (12),
97.512(a)(9), (10) and (12), 97.612(a)(9), (10) and (12), and
97.712(a)(9), (10) and (12). Generally, new units that commenced
commercial operations in 2015 or 2016 will receive second-round 2016
NUSA allocations sufficient to bring the totals of their first- and
second-round allocations up to their 2016 emissions as reported
under 40 CFR part 75 unless the total of such second-round
allocations for all eligible units would exceed the remaining amount
of allowances in the NUSA, in which case the second-round
allocations will be reduced on a pro-rata basis. Any allowances
remaining in any NUSA after second-round allocations to new units--
along with any allowances remaining in any corresponding Indian
country NUSA--will be allocated to the state's existing units in
proportion to their respective 2016 CSAPR FIP allocations of non-
NUSA allowances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA notes that an allocation or lack of allocation of allowances to
a given EGU does not constitute a determination that CSAPR does or does
not apply to the EGU. EPA also notes that allocations are subject to
potential correction.
The detailed unit-by-unit data and preliminary allowance allocation
calculations are set forth in Excel spreadsheets titled
``CSAPR_NUSA_2016_NOX_Annual_1st_Round_Prelim_Data'',
``CSAPR_NUSA_2016_NOX_OS_1st_Round_Prelim_Data'', and
``CSAPR_NUSA_2016_SO2_1st_Round_Prelim_Data,'' available on
EPA's Web site at https://www3.epa.gov/crossstaterule/actions.html. The
three spreadsheets show EPA's initial determinations of 2016 NUSA
allocations for new units subject to the CSAPR NOX Annual,
NOX Ozone Season, and SO2 (Group 1 and Group 2)
trading programs, respectively. Each of the spreadsheets contains a
separate worksheet for each state covered by that program showing, for
each unit identified as eligible for a first-round NUSA allocation, (1)
the unit's emissions in the 2015 control period (annual or ozone season
as applicable), (2) the maximum first-round 2016 NUSA allowance
allocation for which the unit is eligible (typically the unit's
emissions in the 2015 control period), (3) various adjustments to the
unit's maximum allocation, many of which are necessary only if the NUSA
pool is oversubscribed, and (4) the preliminary calculation of the
unit's first-round 2016 NUSA allowance allocation.
Each state worksheet also contains a summary showing (1) the
quantity of allowances initially available in that state's 2016 NUSA,
(2) the sum of the first-round 2016 NUSA allowance allocations that
will be made to new units in that state, assuming there are no
corrections to the data, and (3) the quantity of allowances that would
remain in the 2016 NUSA for use in second-round allocations to new
units (or ultimately for allocation to existing units), again assuming
there are no corrections to the data.
Objections should be strictly limited to the data and calculations
upon which the NUSA allowance allocations are based and should be
emailed to the address identified in ADDRESSES. Objections must
include: (1) Precise identification of the specific data and or
calculations the commenter believes are inaccurate, (2) new proposed
data and or calculations upon which the commenter believes EPA should
rely instead to determine allowance allocations, and (3) the reasons
why EPA should rely on the commenter's proposed data and or
calculations and not the data referenced in this notice.
Authority: 40 CFR 97.411(b), 97.511(b), 97.611(b), and
97.711(b).
Dated: May 19, 2016.
Reid P. Harvey,
Director, Clean Air Markets Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs,
Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 2016-12485 Filed 5-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
