Request for Information: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Data Exchange Standardization, 33199-33200 [2016-12262]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 25, 2016 / Notices mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Summary Of Collection: The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public to comment on the ‘‘Generic Clearance for the Collection of Qualitative Feedback on Agency Service Delivery ’’ for approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et. seq.). This collection is being developed as part of a Federal Government-wide effort to streamline the process for seeking feedback from the public on service delivery. This notice announces our intent to submit this ‘‘fast track’’ collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval and to solicit comments on specific aspects for the proposed information collection. Need And Use Of The Information: The proposed information collection activity provides a means to garner qualitative customer and stakeholder feedback in an efficient and timely manner. By qualitative feedback we mean, information that provides useful insights on perceptions and opinions, but are not statistical surveys that yield quantitative results that can be generalized to the population. This feedback will, (1) provide insights into customer or stakeholder perceptions, experiences and expectations, (2) provide an early warning of issues with service and, (3) focus attention on areas where communication, training or changes in operations might improve delivery of products or services. This collection will allow for ongoing, collaborative and actionable communications between the Agency and its customers and stakeholders. It will also allow feedback to contribute directly to the improvement of program management. Description of Respondents: Individuals and Households, Businesses and Organizations, State, Local or Tribal Government. Number of Respondents: 30,000. Frequency of Responses: Recordkeeping; Reporting: Annually. Total Burden Hours: 30,000. Ruth Brown, Departmental Information Collection Clearance Officer. [FR Doc. 2016–12259 Filed 5–24–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:19 May 24, 2016 Jkt 238001 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Food and Nutrition Service Request for Information: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Data Exchange Standardization Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Section 4016 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 amended Section 11 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require FNS to designate data exchange standards to govern both (1) necessary categories of information that SNAP State agencies operating related programs are required under applicable law to electronically exchange with another State agency, and (2) federal reporting and data exchange requirements under applicable law. The Act also directs FNS to consult with an interagency workgroup established by the Office of Management and Budget, which no longer exists, and to consider State government perspectives. As a result, FNS is issuing this Request for Information in order to obtain State government and other stakeholder perspectives as it considers how to best to proceed with establishing data exchange standards. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 25, 2016. ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to Jane Duffield, Chief, State Administration Branch, Program Accountability and Administration Division, Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), U.S. Department of Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 818, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may also be emailed to SNAPSAB@ fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to http:// www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting comments electronically. All written comments will be open for public inspection at the FNS office located at 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia, 22302, Room 800, during regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday). All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval. All comments will be a matter of public record. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or copies of this request for information should be directed to Jane Duffield at (703) 605–4385. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 33199 Data standardization can enhance the ability of States and the federal government to administer the SNAP program more effectively by strengthening oversight, improving decision-making by program administrators, and fostering innovation through the greater use of data analytics. Data standardization may also help States and the federal government to reduce improper benefit payments, as well as to improve the detection and prevention of fraud, waste, and abuse by allowing for easier data sharing. Greater use of data sharing may improve program integrity by increasing the accuracy of payments, improving efficiency and case management through increased automation, improving decision-making by expanding verification, and by allowing for better-targeted efforts through data analysis of trends across States and populations served by the program. With these general interests in mind, FNS is seeking information from stakeholders on the following particular questions: 1. Legislation requires FNS to propose a rule to identify federally required data exchanges, including the specification and timing of the exchanges to be standardized. FNS is also required to address the factors used to determine whether and when to standardize data exchanges, specify State implementation options, and to describe future milestones. Please provide your input on the following questions: a. Should FNS consider requiring additional data exchanges that are not currently required by SNAP regulations? If so, what additional data exchanges would improve communication between the States and FNS? b. What frequency should be considered for any data exchange that is currently required by regulation, or any data exchange that is not currently required and is being proposed in response to the preceding question? c. What implementation options should be available to States in enacting a standardized data exchange? d. What constraints, if any, would the technologies used to operate existing SNAP eligibility systems have on meeting data exchange requirements? e. If FNS were to standardize a data exchange, how much time would be required for States to adapt processes and systems to comply? 2. The Act specifies that FNS should not require a change to an existing data exchange standard for Federal reporting if that standard has already been found to be effective and efficient. What criteria should FNS consider to determine whether an existing data SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM 25MYN1 mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES 33200 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 25, 2016 / Notices exchange standard is effective and efficient? 3. State agencies already have focused efforts on integrating case management initiatives in order to better coordinate assistance for families with complex service needs across multiple program areas. What factors should FNS consider in a future rule to address SNAP data standardization so as not to adversely impact ongoing or planned initiatives? 4. In promulgating rules, what Federal or State laws should FNS be aware of that either hinder or promote data exchange standards? 5. What factors should FNS consider as part of the data exchange standardization effort to further strengthen client confidentiality? For example, should FNS mandate industry standard security protocols, such as requirements that Social Security Numbers (SSN) be encrypted and that States utilize data masking, or that States may not use SSN as a unique client identifier? If so, how can FNS promote further data interoperability while maintaining data security? 6. Are there any data standardization practices in your current data management process that could apply here, such as standardizing your data field names and definitions, including security classification, and implementing access policies to ensure input data cleansing and output data consistency? 7. Do States provide training to workers involved in the administration and enforcement of SNAP about data sharing? 8. Do States conduct security training with all staff involved in the administration and enforcement of the program that covers the client confidentiality requirements of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, as well as the SNAP regulations? If so, please address additional questions below: a. What is the frequency of the training? b. Does the State maintain a record of each individual worker’s security training history? c. Does the training cover additional security topics? 9. What factors should FNS consider regarding the impact data exchange standards would have on States that integrate data sources external to the SNAP State agency? 10. What barriers, if any, should FNS consider in implementing federally required data exchanges for SNAP program administration? 11. What factors should FNS consider for States that utilize an enterprise data VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:19 May 24, 2016 Jkt 238001 warehouse for reporting and analyzing data in SNAP as well as across programs? 12. Efforts to promote data interoperability to improve oversight, data analysis, and decision-making are only as good as the quality of the data itself. What factors should FNS consider to strengthen SNAP data integrity in support of data exchange standards? 13. In addition to data exchange standards, should FNS consider additional steps related to this effort, such as providing standardized data sharing agreements for SNAP data? 14. What other concerns or barriers, if any, exist in successfully implementing data exchanges that were not addressed by any of the previous questions that FNS should consider? Dated: May 10, 2016. Audrey Rowe, Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. [FR Doc. 2016–12262 Filed 5–24–16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–30–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Foreign Agricultural Service WTO Agricultural Quantity-Based Safeguard Trigger Levels Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. ACTION: Notice of product coverage and trigger levels for safeguard measures provided for in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement on Agriculture. AGENCY: This notice lists the updated quantity-based trigger levels for products which may be subject to additional import duties under the safeguard provisions of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. This notice also includes the relevant period applicable for the trigger levels on each of the listed products. DATES: May 25, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Safeguard Staff, Import Policies and Export Reporting Division, Office of Trade Programs, Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Stop 1020, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–1020; by telephone (202) 720–0638; or by fax (202) 720–0876. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Article 5 of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture provides that additional import duties may be imposed on imports of products subject to tariffication as a result of the Uruguay Round, if certain conditions SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 are met. The agreement permits additional duties to be charged if the price of an individual shipment of imported products falls below the average price for similar goods imported during the years 1986–88 by a specified percentage. It also permits additional duties to be imposed if the volume of imports of an article exceeds the average of the most recent 3 years for which data are available by 5, 10, or 25 percent, depending on the article. These additional duties may not be imposed on quantities for which minimum or current access commitments were made during the Uruguay Round negotiations, and only one type of safeguard, price or quantity, may be applied at any given time to an article. Section 405 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act requires that the President cause to be published in the Federal Register information regarding the price and quantity safeguards, including the quantity trigger levels, which must be updated annually based upon import levels during the most recent 3 years. The President delegated this duty to the Secretary of Agriculture in Presidential Proclamation No. 6763, dated December 23, 1994, 60 FR 1005 (Jan. 4, 1995). The Secretary of Agriculture further delegated this duty, which lies with the Administrator of the Foreign Agricultural Service (7 CFR 2.43(a)(2)). The Annex to this notice contains the updated quantity trigger levels. Additional information on the products subject to safeguards and the additional duties which may apply can be found in subchapter IV of Chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2016) and in the Secretary of Agriculture’s Notice of Uruguay Round Agricultural Safeguard Trigger Levels, published in the Federal Register at 60 FR 427 (Jan. 4, 1995). Notice: As provided in Section 405 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, consistent with Article 5 of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture, the safeguard quantity trigger levels previously notified are superceded by the levels indicated in the Annex to this notice. The definitions of these products were provided in the Notice of Safeguard Action published in the Federal Register, at 60 FR 427 (Jan. 4, 1995). Issued at Washington, DC, this 25th day of April 2016. Suzanne Palmieri, Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service. Annex E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM 25MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 25, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33199-33200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12262]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Food and Nutrition Service


Request for Information: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance 
Program (SNAP) Data Exchange Standardization

AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Section 4016 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 amended Section 
11 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to require FNS to designate 
data exchange standards to govern both (1) necessary categories of 
information that SNAP State agencies operating related programs are 
required under applicable law to electronically exchange with another 
State agency, and (2) federal reporting and data exchange requirements 
under applicable law. The Act also directs FNS to consult with an 
interagency workgroup established by the Office of Management and 
Budget, which no longer exists, and to consider State government 
perspectives. As a result, FNS is issuing this Request for Information 
in order to obtain State government and other stakeholder perspectives 
as it considers how to best to proceed with establishing data exchange 
standards.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before July 25, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to Jane Duffield, Chief, State 
Administration Branch, Program Accountability and Administration 
Division, Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 818, Alexandria, VA 22302. 
Comments may also be emailed to SNAPSAB@fns.usda.gov. Comments will 
also be accepted through the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments electronically.
    All written comments will be open for public inspection at the FNS 
office located at 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia, 22302, 
Room 800, during regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday 
through Friday). All responses to this notice will be summarized and 
included in the request for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) 
approval. All comments will be a matter of public record.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of this request for information should be directed to Jane 
Duffield at (703) 605-4385.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Data standardization can enhance the 
ability of States and the federal government to administer the SNAP 
program more effectively by strengthening oversight, improving 
decision-making by program administrators, and fostering innovation 
through the greater use of data analytics. Data standardization may 
also help States and the federal government to reduce improper benefit 
payments, as well as to improve the detection and prevention of fraud, 
waste, and abuse by allowing for easier data sharing. Greater use of 
data sharing may improve program integrity by increasing the accuracy 
of payments, improving efficiency and case management through increased 
automation, improving decision-making by expanding verification, and by 
allowing for better-targeted efforts through data analysis of trends 
across States and populations served by the program.
    With these general interests in mind, FNS is seeking information 
from stakeholders on the following particular questions:
    1. Legislation requires FNS to propose a rule to identify federally 
required data exchanges, including the specification and timing of the 
exchanges to be standardized. FNS is also required to address the 
factors used to determine whether and when to standardize data 
exchanges, specify State implementation options, and to describe future 
milestones. Please provide your input on the following questions:
    a. Should FNS consider requiring additional data exchanges that are 
not currently required by SNAP regulations? If so, what additional data 
exchanges would improve communication between the States and FNS?
    b. What frequency should be considered for any data exchange that 
is currently required by regulation, or any data exchange that is not 
currently required and is being proposed in response to the preceding 
question?
    c. What implementation options should be available to States in 
enacting a standardized data exchange?
    d. What constraints, if any, would the technologies used to operate 
existing SNAP eligibility systems have on meeting data exchange 
requirements?
    e. If FNS were to standardize a data exchange, how much time would 
be required for States to adapt processes and systems to comply?
    2. The Act specifies that FNS should not require a change to an 
existing data exchange standard for Federal reporting if that standard 
has already been found to be effective and efficient. What criteria 
should FNS consider to determine whether an existing data

[[Page 33200]]

exchange standard is effective and efficient?
    3. State agencies already have focused efforts on integrating case 
management initiatives in order to better coordinate assistance for 
families with complex service needs across multiple program areas. What 
factors should FNS consider in a future rule to address SNAP data 
standardization so as not to adversely impact ongoing or planned 
initiatives?
    4. In promulgating rules, what Federal or State laws should FNS be 
aware of that either hinder or promote data exchange standards?
    5. What factors should FNS consider as part of the data exchange 
standardization effort to further strengthen client confidentiality? 
For example, should FNS mandate industry standard security protocols, 
such as requirements that Social Security Numbers (SSN) be encrypted 
and that States utilize data masking, or that States may not use SSN as 
a unique client identifier? If so, how can FNS promote further data 
interoperability while maintaining data security?
    6. Are there any data standardization practices in your current 
data management process that could apply here, such as standardizing 
your data field names and definitions, including security 
classification, and implementing access policies to ensure input data 
cleansing and output data consistency?
    7. Do States provide training to workers involved in the 
administration and enforcement of SNAP about data sharing?
    8. Do States conduct security training with all staff involved in 
the administration and enforcement of the program that covers the 
client confidentiality requirements of the Food and Nutrition Act of 
2008, as well as the SNAP regulations? If so, please address additional 
questions below:
    a. What is the frequency of the training?
    b. Does the State maintain a record of each individual worker's 
security training history?
    c. Does the training cover additional security topics?
    9. What factors should FNS consider regarding the impact data 
exchange standards would have on States that integrate data sources 
external to the SNAP State agency?
    10. What barriers, if any, should FNS consider in implementing 
federally required data exchanges for SNAP program administration?
    11. What factors should FNS consider for States that utilize an 
enterprise data warehouse for reporting and analyzing data in SNAP as 
well as across programs?
    12. Efforts to promote data interoperability to improve oversight, 
data analysis, and decision-making are only as good as the quality of 
the data itself. What factors should FNS consider to strengthen SNAP 
data integrity in support of data exchange standards?
    13. In addition to data exchange standards, should FNS consider 
additional steps related to this effort, such as providing standardized 
data sharing agreements for SNAP data?
    14. What other concerns or barriers, if any, exist in successfully 
implementing data exchanges that were not addressed by any of the 
previous questions that FNS should consider?

    Dated: May 10, 2016.
Audrey Rowe,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-12262 Filed 5-24-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3410-30-P