Heavy Vehicle Use Tax; Technical Correction, 32229-32230 [2016-11961]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 99 / Monday, May 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 669
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2016–0004]
RIN 2125–AF71
Heavy Vehicle Use Tax; Technical
Correction
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule makes a technical
correction to the regulations that govern
the enforcement of the Heavy Vehicle
Use Tax. The amendments contained
herein make no substantive changes to
FHWA regulations, policies, or
procedures. The current regulation
references a section of the United States
Code that was later amended by the
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century Act (MAP–21).
DATES: This rule is effective June 22,
2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Dougherty, Office of Highway
Policy Information, telephone 202–366–
9234 or email at michael.dougherty@
dot.gov; or William Winne, Office of the
Chief Counsel, telephone 202–366–1397
or email at william.winne@dot.gov. Both
are located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590. Office
hours for FHWA are from 8:00 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., e.t., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Electronic Access
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded by accessing the
Office of the Federal Register’s home
page at: https://www.archives.gov or the
Government Printing Office’s Web page
at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara.
Background
This rulemaking makes technical
corrections to the regulations that
govern policies and procedures relating
to the enforcement of the Heavy Vehicle
Use Tax found at 23 CFR part 669. In
the final rule published in the Federal
Register on July 26, 2010 (75 FR 43409),
FHWA referenced 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(4) in
23 CFR 669.13 and 669.19, which at that
time governed the effect of failure to
certify or to adequately obtain proof-ofpayment and the reservation and
reapportionment of funds. Section
1404(d)(2) of MAP–21 (PL 112–141),
enacted in 2012, amended that section
and inserted revised language governing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
the Heavy Vehicle Use Tax at 23 U.S.C.
104(b)(1). As a result of the language in
MAP–21, the penalty for States for noncompliance with the proof of payment
requirements of the Federal Heavy
Vehicle Use Tax at the time of State
registration was amended. The penalty
computation was amended by statute to
eight percent of the amount apportioned
in any fiscal year beginning after
September 30, 1984 (23 U.S.C. 104(b)(1))
as was reference to the amended portion
of the statute at section 104(b)(1).
However, the regulations in 23 CFR
part 669 have several references to the
old statute at 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(4) and
also suggest the penalty is 25 percent
rather than 8 percent. As such,
references in 23 CFR 669.13 and 669.19
to 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(4) cause confusion.
These amendments will direct readers
of 23 CFR 669 to the proper section of
23 U.S.C.
Finally, the authority citation for part
669 will be updated to reflect
ministerial changes in the numbering of
FHWA delegations of authority made
with the publication of the final rule on
Organization and Delegation of Powers
and Duties on August 17, 2012 (77 FR
49964, 49981). The current regulation
cites authority contained in 49 CFR
1.48. The location of those sections
describing delegations to the Federal
Highway Administrator are now found
at 49 CFR 1.85.
The 2012 change in location within
the CFR is ministerial in nature and
pertains to DOT management and
organization. Amendment of the section
identifying the authority for part 669
will direct readers to the proper section
of 49 CFR.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notice
Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency may
waive the normal notice and comment
requirements if it finds, for good cause,
that they are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest. The FHWA finds that notice
and comment for this rule is
unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest because it will have no
substantive impact, is technical in
nature, and relates only to management,
organization, procedure, and practice.
The amendments to the rule are based
upon the explicit language of statutes
that were enacted subsequent to the
promulgation of the rule. The FHWA
does not anticipate receiving
meaningful comments on it. State and
local governments rely upon the
regulations corrected by this action.
These corrections will reduce confusion
for these entities and should not be
unnecessarily delayed. Accordingly, for
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
32229
the reasons listed above, FHWA finds
good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B)
to waive notice and opportunity for
comment.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review), and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The FHWA has determined that this
final rule is not a significant regulatory
action within the meaning of Executive
Orders 12866 or significant within the
meaning of DOT regulatory policies and
procedures. This action complies with
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 to
improve regulation. It is anticipated that
the economic impact of this rulemaking
will be minimal. This final rule only
makes minor corrections that will not
alter the regulatory effect of 23 CFR 669.
Thus, the final rule will not adversely
affect, in a material way, any sector of
the economy. In addition, these changes
will not interfere with any action taken
or planned by another agency and will
not materially alter the budgetary
impact of any entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96–354), FHWA
has evaluated the effects of this action
on small entities and has determined
that the action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The final rule will not make any
substantive changes to our regulations
or in the way that our regulations affect
small entities; it merely corrects
technical errors. For this reason, FHWA
certifies that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
This final rule does not impose
unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This final rule does not
impose any requirements on State, local,
or tribal governments, or the private
sector and, thus, will not require those
entities to expend any funds.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This final rule has been analyzed in
accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132. The FHWA has determined that
this final rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism assessment.
The FHWA has also determined that
this final rule does not preempt any
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
32230
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 99 / Monday, May 23, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
State law or State regulation or affect the
States’ ability to discharge traditional
State governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372
(Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to
these programs.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not create any
new information collection
requirements for which submission to
the Office of Management and Budget
would be needed under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
National Environmental Policy Act
The FHWA has analyzed this final
rule for the purpose of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4347) and has determined
that this action will not have any effect
on the quality of the environment.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation)
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
This final rule has been analyzed
under Executive Order 13211. The
FHWA has determined that it is not a
significant energy action under that
order because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 and this final rule is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number
(RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
Information Service Center publishes
the Unified Agenda in April and
October of each year. The RINs
contained in the heading of this
document can be used to cross reference
this action with the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 669
Excise taxes, Grant programstransportation, Highways and roads,
Motor vehicles.
Issued on: May 13, 2016.
Gregory G. Nadeau,
Administrator, Federal Highway
Administration.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
§ 669.13 Effect of failure to certify or to
adequately obtain proof-of-payment.
sradovich on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
Under Executive Order 13045 this
final rule is not economically significant
and does not involve an environmental
risk to health and safety that may
disproportionally affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
This final rule will not affect a taking
of private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 May 20, 2016
Jkt 238001
PART 669—ENFORCEMENT OF
HEAVY VEHICLE USE TAX
1. Revise the authority citation for part
699 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 141(c) and 315; 49
CFR 1.85.
2. Revise § 669.13 to read as follows:
If a State fails to certify as required by
this regulation or if the Secretary of
Transportation determines that a State is
not adequately obtaining proof-ofpayment of the heavy vehicle use tax as
a condition of registration
notwithstanding the State’s certification,
Federal-aid highway funds apportioned
to the State under 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(1) for
the next fiscal year shall be reduced in
an amount up to 8 percent as
determined by the Secretary.
■ 3. Amend § 669.19 by revising
paragraph (a) and the first sentence of
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 669.19 Reservation and reapportionment
of funds.
(a) The Administrator may reserve
from obligation up to 8 percent of a
State’s apportionment of funds under 23
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms,
and Explosives
27 CFR Part 478
[Docket No. ATF 2008R–15P; AG Order No.
3670–2016]
Federal Firearms License
Proceedings—Hearings
In consideration of the foregoing, 23
CFR part 669 is amended as set forth
below.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988 to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
[FR Doc. 2016–11961 Filed 5–20–16; 8:45 am]
RIN 1140–AA38
The FHWA has analyzed this final
rule under Executive Order 13175. The
FHWA concluded that the final rule will
not have substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes; will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian tribal government; and
will not preempt tribal law. There are
no requirements set forth in the final
rule that directly affect one or more
Indian tribes. Therefore, a tribal
summary impact statement is not
required.
■
U.S.C. 104(b)(1), pending a final
determination.
(b) Funds withheld pursuant to a final
administrative determination under this
regulation shall be reapportioned to all
other eligible States pursuant to the
formulas of 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(1) and the
apportionment factors in effect at the
time of the original apportionments,
unless the Secretary determines, on the
basis of information submitted by the
State, that the state has come into
conformity with this regulation prior to
the final determination. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives (ATF),
Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice is
amending the regulations of the Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and
Explosives (ATF) regarding
administrative hearings held as part of
firearms license proceedings. This rule
clarifies that persons requesting a
hearing will be afforded the opportunity
to submit facts and arguments for
review and consideration during the
hearing, and may make offers of
settlement before or after the hearing.
The regulations are intended to ensure
that Federal firearms licensees and
persons applying for a Federal firearms
license are familiar with the hearing
process relative to the denial,
suspension, or revocation of a firearms
license, or imposition of a civil fine.
DATES: This rule is effective July 22,
2016.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shermaine Kenner, Office of Regulatory
Affairs, Enforcement Programs and
Services, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms, and Explosives, U.S.
Department of Justice, 99 New York
Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226;
telephone: (202) 648–7070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23MYR1.SGM
23MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32229-32230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11961]
[[Page 32229]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 669
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA-2016-0004]
RIN 2125-AF71
Heavy Vehicle Use Tax; Technical Correction
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule makes a technical correction to the regulations that
govern the enforcement of the Heavy Vehicle Use Tax. The amendments
contained herein make no substantive changes to FHWA regulations,
policies, or procedures. The current regulation references a section of
the United States Code that was later amended by the Moving Ahead for
Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21).
DATES: This rule is effective June 22, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Dougherty, Office of Highway
Policy Information, telephone 202-366-9234 or email at
michael.dougherty@dot.gov; or William Winne, Office of the Chief
Counsel, telephone 202-366-1397 or email at william.winne@dot.gov. Both
are located at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. Office
hours for FHWA are from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., e.t., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded by accessing
the Office of the Federal Register's home page at: https://www.archives.gov or the Government Printing Office's Web page at:
https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara.
Background
This rulemaking makes technical corrections to the regulations that
govern policies and procedures relating to the enforcement of the Heavy
Vehicle Use Tax found at 23 CFR part 669. In the final rule published
in the Federal Register on July 26, 2010 (75 FR 43409), FHWA referenced
23 U.S.C. 104(b)(4) in 23 CFR 669.13 and 669.19, which at that time
governed the effect of failure to certify or to adequately obtain
proof-of-payment and the reservation and reapportionment of funds.
Section 1404(d)(2) of MAP-21 (PL 112-141), enacted in 2012, amended
that section and inserted revised language governing the Heavy Vehicle
Use Tax at 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(1). As a result of the language in MAP-21,
the penalty for States for non-compliance with the proof of payment
requirements of the Federal Heavy Vehicle Use Tax at the time of State
registration was amended. The penalty computation was amended by
statute to eight percent of the amount apportioned in any fiscal year
beginning after September 30, 1984 (23 U.S.C. 104(b)(1)) as was
reference to the amended portion of the statute at section 104(b)(1).
However, the regulations in 23 CFR part 669 have several references
to the old statute at 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(4) and also suggest the penalty
is 25 percent rather than 8 percent. As such, references in 23 CFR
669.13 and 669.19 to 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(4) cause confusion. These
amendments will direct readers of 23 CFR 669 to the proper section of
23 U.S.C.
Finally, the authority citation for part 669 will be updated to
reflect ministerial changes in the numbering of FHWA delegations of
authority made with the publication of the final rule on Organization
and Delegation of Powers and Duties on August 17, 2012 (77 FR 49964,
49981). The current regulation cites authority contained in 49 CFR
1.48. The location of those sections describing delegations to the
Federal Highway Administrator are now found at 49 CFR 1.85.
The 2012 change in location within the CFR is ministerial in nature
and pertains to DOT management and organization. Amendment of the
section identifying the authority for part 669 will direct readers to
the proper section of 49 CFR.
Rulemaking Analyses and Notice
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553(b)), an agency
may waive the normal notice and comment requirements if it finds, for
good cause, that they are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest. The FHWA finds that notice and comment for this
rule is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest because it will
have no substantive impact, is technical in nature, and relates only to
management, organization, procedure, and practice. The amendments to
the rule are based upon the explicit language of statutes that were
enacted subsequent to the promulgation of the rule. The FHWA does not
anticipate receiving meaningful comments on it. State and local
governments rely upon the regulations corrected by this action. These
corrections will reduce confusion for these entities and should not be
unnecessarily delayed. Accordingly, for the reasons listed above, FHWA
finds good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) to waive notice and
opportunity for comment.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), Executive Order
13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures
The FHWA has determined that this final rule is not a significant
regulatory action within the meaning of Executive Orders 12866 or
significant within the meaning of DOT regulatory policies and
procedures. This action complies with Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
to improve regulation. It is anticipated that the economic impact of
this rulemaking will be minimal. This final rule only makes minor
corrections that will not alter the regulatory effect of 23 CFR 669.
Thus, the final rule will not adversely affect, in a material way, any
sector of the economy. In addition, these changes will not interfere
with any action taken or planned by another agency and will not
materially alter the budgetary impact of any entitlements, grants, user
fees, or loan programs.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354),
FHWA has evaluated the effects of this action on small entities and has
determined that the action will not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The final rule will not make
any substantive changes to our regulations or in the way that our
regulations affect small entities; it merely corrects technical errors.
For this reason, FHWA certifies that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This final rule does not impose unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This final rule
does not impose any requirements on State, local, or tribal
governments, or the private sector and, thus, will not require those
entities to expend any funds.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This final rule has been analyzed in accordance with the principles
and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132. The FHWA has
determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism assessment. The
FHWA has also determined that this final rule does not preempt any
[[Page 32230]]
State law or State regulation or affect the States' ability to
discharge traditional State governmental functions.
Executive Order 12372 (Intergovernmental Review)
The regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities apply
to these programs.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not create any new information collection
requirements for which submission to the Office of Management and
Budget would be needed under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501-3520).
National Environmental Policy Act
The FHWA has analyzed this final rule for the purpose of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4347) and has
determined that this action will not have any effect on the quality of
the environment.
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal Consultation)
The FHWA has analyzed this final rule under Executive Order 13175.
The FHWA concluded that the final rule will not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes; will not impose substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian tribal government; and will not
preempt tribal law. There are no requirements set forth in the final
rule that directly affect one or more Indian tribes. Therefore, a
tribal summary impact statement is not required.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988 to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity,
and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of Children)
Under Executive Order 13045 this final rule is not economically
significant and does not involve an environmental risk to health and
safety that may disproportionally affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of Private Property)
This final rule will not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
This final rule has been analyzed under Executive Order 13211. The
FHWA has determined that it is not a significant energy action under
that order because it is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 and this final rule is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number (RIN) is assigned to each
regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations.
The Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda
in April and October of each year. The RINs contained in the heading of
this document can be used to cross reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 669
Excise taxes, Grant programs-transportation, Highways and roads,
Motor vehicles.
Issued on: May 13, 2016.
Gregory G. Nadeau,
Administrator, Federal Highway Administration.
In consideration of the foregoing, 23 CFR part 669 is amended as
set forth below.
PART 669--ENFORCEMENT OF HEAVY VEHICLE USE TAX
0
1. Revise the authority citation for part 699 to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 141(c) and 315; 49 CFR 1.85.
0
2. Revise Sec. 669.13 to read as follows:
Sec. 669.13 Effect of failure to certify or to adequately obtain
proof-of-payment.
If a State fails to certify as required by this regulation or if
the Secretary of Transportation determines that a State is not
adequately obtaining proof-of-payment of the heavy vehicle use tax as a
condition of registration notwithstanding the State's certification,
Federal-aid highway funds apportioned to the State under 23 U.S.C.
104(b)(1) for the next fiscal year shall be reduced in an amount up to
8 percent as determined by the Secretary.
0
3. Amend Sec. 669.19 by revising paragraph (a) and the first sentence
of paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 669.19 Reservation and reapportionment of funds.
(a) The Administrator may reserve from obligation up to 8 percent
of a State's apportionment of funds under 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(1), pending
a final determination.
(b) Funds withheld pursuant to a final administrative determination
under this regulation shall be reapportioned to all other eligible
States pursuant to the formulas of 23 U.S.C. 104(b)(1) and the
apportionment factors in effect at the time of the original
apportionments, unless the Secretary determines, on the basis of
information submitted by the State, that the state has come into
conformity with this regulation prior to the final determination. * * *
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-11961 Filed 5-20-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P