Paul Didelius-Continuance in Control Exemption-WRL, LLC, 32004-32005 [2016-11974]
Download as PDF
32004
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2016 / Notices
Dated: March 24, 2016.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2016–11982 Filed 5–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–AD–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 9577]
In the Matter of the Designation of
Samir Kuntar, Also Known as Samir
Quntar, Also Known as Sameer Kantar,
Also Known as Samir Al-Kuntar, Also
Known as Samir Qantar, Also Known
as Samir Kintar, Also Known as Samir
Qintar, Also Known as Samir Cantar as
a Specially Designated Global Terrorist
In accordance with section 1(b) of
Executive Order 13224 of September 23,
2001, as amended (‘‘the Order’’), I
hereby determine the individual known
as Samir Kuntar, also known as Samir
Quntar, also known as Sameer Kantar,
also known as Samir Al-Kuntar, also
known as Samir Qantar, also known as
Samir Kintar, also known as Samir
Qintar, also known as Samir Cantar, no
longer meets the criteria for designation
under the Order, and therefore I hereby
revoke the designation of the
aforementioned individual as a
Specially Designated Global Terrorist
pursuant to section 1(b) of the Order.
This notice shall be published in the
Federal Register.
Dated: April 27, 2016.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice: 9570]
Culturally Significant Objects Imported
for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Bruce
Conner: It’s All True’’ Exhibition
Notice is hereby given of the
following determinations: Pursuant to
the authority vested in me by the Act of
October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C.
2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the
Foreign Affairs Reform and
Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.
2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et
seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of
October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority
No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as
appropriate, Delegation of Authority No.
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby
determine that the objects to be
included in the exhibition ‘‘Bruce
Conner: It’s All True,’’ imported from
abroad for temporary exhibition within
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2016–11986 Filed 5–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
[Public Notice: 9575]
BILLING CODE 4710–AD–P
17:40 May 19, 2016
Dated: May 13, 2016.
Mark Taplin,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs,
Department of State.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[FR Doc. 2016–11984 Filed 5–19–16; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
the United States, are of cultural
significance. The objects are imported
pursuant to loan agreements with the
foreign owners or custodians. I also
determine that the exhibition or display
of the exhibit objects at The Museum of
Modern Art, New York, New York, from
on about July 3, 2016, until on or about
October 2, 2016, at the San Francisco
Museum of Modern Art, San Francisco,
California, from on or about October 29,
2016, until on or about January 22,
2017, and at possible additional
exhibitions or venues yet to be
determined, is in the national interest.
I have ordered that Public Notice of
these Determinations be published in
the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, including a list of
the imported objects, contact the Office
of Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs
in the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S.
Department of State (telephone: 202–
632–6471; email: section2459@
state.gov). The mailing address is U.S.
Department of State, L/PD, SA–5, Suite
5H03, Washington, DC 20522–0505.
Jkt 238001
In the Matter of the Designation of ISILLibya, aka Islamic State of Iraq and the
Levant-Libya, aka Islamic State and the
Levant in Libya, aka Wilayat Barqa, aka
Wilayat Fezzan, aka Wilayat
Tripolitania, aka Wilayat Tarablus, aka
Wilayat al-Tarablus, as a Foreign
Terrorist Organization Pursuant to Sec.
219 of the Immigration and Nationality
Act, as Amended
Based upon review of the
Administrative Record assembled in
this matter, and in consultation with the
Attorney General and the Secretary of
the Treasury, I conclude that there is
sufficient factual basis to find that the
relevant circumstances described in sec.
219 of the Immigration and Nationality
Act, as amended (heinafter ‘‘INA’’) (8
U.S.C. 1189), exist with respect to ISILLibya, also known as Islamic State of
Iraq and the Levant-Libya, also known
as Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
in Libya, also known as Wilayat Barqa,
also known as Wialyat Fezzan, also
known as Wilayat Tripolitania, also
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
known as Wilayat Tarablus, also known
as Wilayat al-Tarablus.
Therefore, I hereby designate the
aforementioned organization and its
aliases as a foreign terrorist organization
pursuant to sec. 219 of the INA.
This determination shall be published
in the Federal Register.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2016–11992 Filed 5–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–AD–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36003]
Paul Didelius—Continuance in Control
Exemption—WRL, LLC
Paul Didelius (Didelius), an
individual and noncarrier,1 has filed a
verified notice of exemption pursuant to
49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to continue in
control of WRL, LLC (WRL), upon
WRL’s becoming a Class III rail carrier.
This transaction is related to a
concurrently filed verified notice of
modified certificate of public
convenience and necessity in WRL,
LLC—Notice of Modified Rail
Certificate, Docket No. FD 36002, in
which WRL seeks Board approval to
lease and operate a line of railroad (the
Line) which was previously authorized
for abandonment, and thereafter
acquired by the Port of Royal Slope, a
Washington State municipal
corporation. The total distance of the
Line is approximately 26 miles: (1)
Originating at milepost 1989.06, near
Othello, Adams County, Wash., and
continuing west to milepost 2009, at
Royal City Junction, Grant County,
Wash.; and (2) then northbound, a
distance of 5.2 miles, terminating at an
industrial siding near Royal City, Grant
County, Wash.
The transaction may be consummated
on or after June 5, 2016, the effective
date of the exemption (30 days after the
verified notice of exemption was filed).
Didelius represents that: (1) The rail
properties that will be operated and
controlled by Didelius, namely WRL,
YCR, LRY, and CCET, do not connect
with each other or any railroad in their
corporate family; (2) there are no plans
1 Didelius currently owns 100% of LRY, LLC d/
b/a Lake Railway (LRY), a Class III carrier that
leases and operates rail lines owned by Union
Pacific Railroad Company in California and Oregon;
49% of YCR Corporation (YCR), a Class III rail
carrier established for the purpose of leasing and
operating a line of railroad owned by Yakima
County, Wash; and 100% of CCET, LLC (CCET), a
Class III short line rail carrier organized for the
purpose of leasing and operating a rail line owned
by Norfolk Southern Railway Company in Ohio.
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 98 / Friday, May 20, 2016 / Notices
to acquire additional rail lines for the
purpose of making a connection; and (3)
each of the carriers involved in the
continuance in control transaction is a
Class III carrier. Therefore, the
transaction is exempt from the prior
approval requirements of 49 U.S.C.
11323. See 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. Section 11326(c), however,
does not provide for labor protection for
transactions under 11324 and 11325
that involve only Class III rail carriers.
Accordingly, the Board may not impose
labor protective conditions here,
because all of the carriers involved are
Class III carriers.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions for stay must
be filed no later than May 27, 2016 (at
least seven days before the exemption
becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD
36003, must be filed with Surface
Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20423–0001. In
addition, one copy of each pleading
must be served on James H.M. Savage,
22 Rockingham Court, Germantown, MD
20874.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at
WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.
Decided: May 17, 2016.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Tia Delano,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2016–11974 Filed 5–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Noise Exposure Map Notice for
Charlotte Douglas International Airport
(CLT), Charlotte, NC
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces its
determination that the Noise Exposure
Maps (NEMs) submitted by the City of
Charlotte for Charlotte Douglas
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 May 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
International Airport under the
provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et seq.
(Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement
Act (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘the
Act’’)) and 14 CFR part 150 (hereinafter
referred to as ‘‘Part 150’’) are in
compliance with applicable
requirements.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date
of the FAA’s compliance determination
on the NEMs is April 12, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aaron Braswell, Federal Aviation
Administration, Memphis Airports
District Office, 2600 Thousand Oaks
Blvd., Suite 2250, Memphis, TN 38118,
901–322–8192.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice announces that the FAA finds
that the NEMs submitted for the
Charlotte Douglas International Airport
Airport (CLT) are in compliance with
applicable requirements of Part 150,
effective April 12, 2016. Under the Act,
an airport operator (hereinafter referred
to as ‘‘Sponsor’’) may submit to the FAA
NEMs which meet applicable
regulations and which depict noncompatible land uses as of the date of
submission of such maps, a description
of projected aircraft operations, and the
ways in which such operations will
affect such maps. The Act requires that
the Sponsor develop its NEMs in
consultation with interested and
affected parties in the local community,
government agencies, and persons using
the airport. The FAA has relied on the
certification by the City of Charlotte,
under § 150.21 of Part 150, that the
statutorily required consultation has
been accomplished.
An airport Sponsor who has
submitted NEMs that are found by the
FAA to be in compliance with the
requirements of Part 150 may submit a
Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) for
FAA approval which sets forth the
measures the Sponsor has taken or
proposes to take to reduce existing noncompatible uses and prevent the
introduction of additional noncompatible uses.
The FAA has completed its review of
the NEMs and accompanying
documentation submitted by City of
Charlotte. The documentation that
constitutes the ‘‘NEMs’’ as defined in
§ 150.7 of Part 150 includes: Exhibit 3–
1, Existing (2015) Noise Contour;
Exhibit 4–1, Future (2020) Noise
Contour; Exhibit C–11, Runway 18L
Flight Tracks; Exhibit C–12, Runway
18C Flight Tracks; Exhibit C–13,
Runway 18R Flight Tracks; Exhibit C–
14, Runway 36R Flight Tracks; Exhibit
C–15, Runway 36C Flight Tracks;
Exhibit C–16, Runway 36L Flight
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32005
Tracks; Exhibit C–17, Runway 05 Flight
Tracks; Exhibit C–18, Runway 23 Flight
Tracks; Exhibit C–19, Helicopter Flight
Tracks; Table C–1, Distribution of
Average Daily Operations by Aircraft
Category Existing (2015) Conditions;
Table C–2, Runway End Utilization—
Existing (2015) Conditions; Table C–3,
Arrival Flight Track Utilization
Percentages Existing (2015) and Future
(2020) Conditions; Table C–4, Departure
Flight Track Utilization Percentages
Existing (2015) and Future (2020)
Conditions; Table C–5, Departure Trip
Length Distribution Existing (2015)
Conditions; Table C–6, Aircraft Engine
Run-Ups—Existing (2015) Conditions;
Table C–7, Distribution of Average Daily
Operations by Aircraft Type Future
(2020) Conditions; Table C–8, Departure
Trip Length Distribution—Future (2020)
Conditions; Table C–9, Ground Run-Up
Operations—Future (2020) Conditions;
Appendix F. The FAA has determined
that these NEMs and accompanying
documentation are in compliance with
applicable requirements. This
determination is effective on April 12,
2016.
FAA’s determination on the airport
Sponsor’s NEMs is limited to a finding
that the maps were developed in
accordance with the procedures
contained in Appendix A of Part 150.
Such determination does not constitute
approval of the Sponsor’s data,
information, or plans, and is not a
commitment to approve a NCP or to
fund the implementation of that
Program. If questions arise concerning
the precise relationship of specific
properties to noise exposure contours
depicted on a NEM submitted under
§ 47503 of the Act, it is emphasized that
the FAA is not involved in any way in
determining the relative locations of
specific properties with regard to the
depicted noise exposure contours, or in
interpreting the NEMs to resolve
questions concerning, for example,
which properties should be covered by
the provisions of § 47506 of the Act.
These functions are inseparable from
the ultimate land use control and
planning responsibilities of local
government and remain unchanged by
FAA’s NEM compliance determination
under Part 150. The responsibility for
the detailed overlaying of noise
exposure contours onto the map
depicting properties on the surface rests
exclusively with the airport Sponsor
that submitted those maps, or with
those public agencies and planning
agencies with which consultation is
required under § 47503 of the Act.
Copies of the full NEM
documentation are available for
E:\FR\FM\20MYN1.SGM
20MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32004-32005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11974]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36003]
Paul Didelius--Continuance in Control Exemption--WRL, LLC
Paul Didelius (Didelius), an individual and noncarrier,\1\ has
filed a verified notice of exemption pursuant to 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to
continue in control of WRL, LLC (WRL), upon WRL's becoming a Class III
rail carrier.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Didelius currently owns 100% of LRY, LLC d/b/a Lake Railway
(LRY), a Class III carrier that leases and operates rail lines owned
by Union Pacific Railroad Company in California and Oregon; 49% of
YCR Corporation (YCR), a Class III rail carrier established for the
purpose of leasing and operating a line of railroad owned by Yakima
County, Wash; and 100% of CCET, LLC (CCET), a Class III short line
rail carrier organized for the purpose of leasing and operating a
rail line owned by Norfolk Southern Railway Company in Ohio.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This transaction is related to a concurrently filed verified notice
of modified certificate of public convenience and necessity in WRL,
LLC--Notice of Modified Rail Certificate, Docket No. FD 36002, in which
WRL seeks Board approval to lease and operate a line of railroad (the
Line) which was previously authorized for abandonment, and thereafter
acquired by the Port of Royal Slope, a Washington State municipal
corporation. The total distance of the Line is approximately 26 miles:
(1) Originating at milepost 1989.06, near Othello, Adams County, Wash.,
and continuing west to milepost 2009, at Royal City Junction, Grant
County, Wash.; and (2) then northbound, a distance of 5.2 miles,
terminating at an industrial siding near Royal City, Grant County,
Wash.
The transaction may be consummated on or after June 5, 2016, the
effective date of the exemption (30 days after the verified notice of
exemption was filed).
Didelius represents that: (1) The rail properties that will be
operated and controlled by Didelius, namely WRL, YCR, LRY, and CCET, do
not connect with each other or any railroad in their corporate family;
(2) there are no plans
[[Page 32005]]
to acquire additional rail lines for the purpose of making a
connection; and (3) each of the carriers involved in the continuance in
control transaction is a Class III carrier. Therefore, the transaction
is exempt from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323. See
49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2).
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption
authority to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to
protect the interests of its employees. Section 11326(c), however, does
not provide for labor protection for transactions under 11324 and 11325
that involve only Class III rail carriers. Accordingly, the Board may
not impose labor protective conditions here, because all of the
carriers involved are Class III carriers.
If the verified notice contains false or misleading information,
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the
exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than May 27, 2016
(at least seven days before the exemption becomes effective).
An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to Docket No.
FD 36003, must be filed with Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street
SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, one copy of each pleading
must be served on James H.M. Savage, 22 Rockingham Court, Germantown,
MD 20874.
Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at
WWW.STB.DOT.GOV.
Decided: May 17, 2016.
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of
Proceedings.
Tia Delano,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2016-11974 Filed 5-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P