Glacial Ridge National Wildlife Refuge, Polk County, Minnesota; Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment, 31655-31656 [2016-11803]
Download as PDF
31655
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 97 / Thursday, May 19, 2016 / Notices
Completion
time per
response
(minutes)
Number of
responses
Activity
Total annual
burden hours
(minutes)
Follow-Up Interviews with Nonrespondents ................................................................................
80
5
7
TOTALS ................................................................................................................................
2,520
........................
458
Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden
Cost: None.
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
ACTION:
III. Comments
Dated: May 13, 2016.
Tina A. Campbell,
Chief, Division of Policy, Performance, and
Management Programs, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–11762 Filed 5–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R3–R–2016–N073; FXRS1261030000–
167–FF03R02000]
Glacial Ridge National Wildlife Refuge,
Polk County, Minnesota; Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and
Environmental Assessment
AGENCY:
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 May 18, 2016
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and
environmental assessment (EA) for the
Glacial Ridge National Wildlife Refuge
(refuge, NWR) for public review and
comment. In this draft CCP/EA we
describe how we propose to manage the
refuge for the next 15 years.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
June 20, 2016. We will hold an open
house–style meeting during the
comment period to receive comments
and provide information on the draft
plan. In addition, we will use special
mailings, newspaper articles, internet
postings, and other media
announcements to inform people of
opportunities for input.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information by any of
the following methods:
• Email: r3planning@fws.gov. Include
‘‘Glacial Ridge Draft CCP/EA’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: Attention: Refuge Manager,
Glacial Ridge NWR, 218–687–2225.
• U.S. Mail: Attention: Refuge
Manager, Glacial Ridge NWR, 17788
349th St. SE., Erskine, MN 56535.
• In-Person Drop Off: You may drop
off comments during regular business
hours at the above addresses.
You will find the draft CCP/EA, as
well as information about the planning
process and a summary of the CCP, on
the planning Web site at https://
www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/
glacialridge/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregg Knutsen, 218–687–2229 x16.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
We invite comments concerning this
information collection on:
• Whether or not the collection of
information is necessary, including
whether or not the information will
have practical utility;
• The accuracy of our estimate of the
burden for this collection of
information;
• Ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this IC. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Jkt 238001
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP
process for Glacial Ridge National
Wildlife Refuge, which we began by
publishing a notice of intent in the
Federal Register (78 FR 3909) on
January 17, 2013. For more about the
initial process and the history of this
refuge, see that notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee) (Administration Act),
requires us to develop a CCP for each
national wildlife refuge. The purpose in
developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year strategy for
achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System
(NWRS), consistent with sound
principles of fish and wildlife
management, conservation, legal
mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction on conserving wildlife and
their habitats, CCPs identify wildlifedependent recreational opportunities
available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography,
and environmental education and
interpretation. We will review and
update the CCP at least every 15 years
in accordance with the Administration
Act.
Each unit of the NWRS was
established for specific purposes. We
use these purposes as the foundation for
developing and prioritizing the
management goals and objectives for
each refuge within the NWRS mission,
and to determine how the public can
use each refuge. The planning process is
a way for us and the public to evaluate
management goals and objectives that
will ensure the best possible approach
to wildlife, plant, and habitat
conservation, while providing for
wildlife-dependent recreation
opportunities that are compatible with
each refuge’s establishing purposes and
the mission of the NWRS.
Additional Information
The draft CCP/EA may be found at
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/
glacialridge/. That document
incorporates an EA, prepared in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (43
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The draft CCP/EA
includes detailed information about the
planning process, refuge, issues, and
management alternatives considered
and proposed. The EA includes
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
31656
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 97 / Thursday, May 19, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
discussions of three alternative refuge
management options. The Service’s
preferred alternative is reflected in the
draft CCP.
The alternatives analyzed in detail
include:
• Alternative A: Current Management
(No Action)—This alternative reflects
the current management direction of
Glacial Ridge NWR. It provides the
baseline against which to compare other
alternatives. For NEPA purposes, this is
referred to as the ‘‘No Action’’
alternative.
• Alternative B: Focused Habitat
Management (Preferred Alternative)—
Under this alternative, refuge
management actions would approximate
ecological processes that maintained
native habitats prior to European
settlement, emphasizing the use of
multiple habitat disturbance regimes
(e.g., fire, grazing, mowing). These
actions would maintain and increase the
diversity of native vegetation and
wildlife communities that mimic presettlement conditions. Management
activities would be ‘‘focused’’ via a
refuge prioritization effort to maximize
the intended impacts on priority units,
given reduced refuge staff and funding.
Public use opportunities would
continue with minimal changes. Staff
time and funding would focus on
improving opportunities for self-guided
interpretation of refuge habitats and
wildlife using existing infrastructure.
• Alternative C: Woody Vegetation
Reduction Focus—The focus of this
alternative would be the reduction of
invasive woody vegetation cover (e.g.,
willow, aspen) across the refuge
landscape during the lifespan of this
CCP. The extent of woody cover is
increasing due to a lack of regular
vegetative disturbance and other factors.
Management actions would focus on
refuge units exhibiting woody
vegetation cover that exceeds the
amount found prior to European
settlement. Public use opportunities
would continue with minimal change.
Staff time and funding would focus on
improving opportunities for self-guided
interpretation of refuge habitats and
wildlife using existing infrastructure.
Public Involvement
We will give the public an
opportunity to provide input at a public
meeting. You can obtain the schedule
from the address or Web site listed in
this notice (see ADDRESSES). You may
also submit comments anytime during
the comment period.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:47 May 18, 2016
Jkt 238001
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
2719(b)(1)(B)(iii), to the general
prohibition contained in 25 U.S.C.
2719(a) on gaming on lands acquired in
trust after October 17, 1988.
The Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs, on behalf of the Secretary of the
Interior, will immediately acquire title
in the name of the United States of
America in trust for the Cloverdale
Rancheria of Pomo Indians, California.
Charles M. Wooley,
Acting Regional Director.
Legal Description
The 61.83 acres, more or less, are
located in the County of Sonoma, State
of California, and are described as
follows:
[FR Doc. 2016–11803 Filed 5–18–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[167 A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900]
Land Acquisitions; Cloverdale
Rancheria of Pomo Indians of
California
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of final agency
determination.
AGENCY:
The Assistant Secretary—
Indian Affairs made a final agency
determination to acquire approximately
61.83 acres, more or less, of land in trust
for the Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo
Indians, California, for gaming and other
purposes on April 29, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Bureau of Indian Affairs, MS–
3657 MIB, 1849 C Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20240; telephone (202)
219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice is published in the exercise of
authority delegated by the Secretary of
the Interior to the Assistant Secretary—
Indian Affairs by 209 Departmental
Manual 8.1, and is published to comply
with the requirements of 25 CFR
151.12(c)(2)(ii) that notice of the
decision to acquire land in trust be
promptly provided in the Federal
Register.
On April 29, 2016, the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs issued a
decision to accept approximately 61.83
acres, more or less, of land into trust for
the Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo
Indians of California (Tribe) under the
authority of the Indian Reorganization
Act of 1934, 25 U.S.C. 465. The
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs
determined that the Tribe’s request also
meets the requirements of the Indian
Gaming Regulatory Act’s ‘‘restored
lands’’ exception, 25 U.S.C.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
APN: 116–310–039–000, 116–310–035–
000 and 116–310–040–000
Parcel One
Commencing at a point in the center
of the main public road leading from
Cloverdale to Healdsburg, at the
southwesterly corner of the land of
Allegrini, and which said point of
beginning is the northwesterly corner of
the land described in that certain deed
dated February 16, 1916 executed by
Mary M. Markell to Fred J. Daniels and
recorded February 24, 1917, in liber 350
of deeds, at page 101, Sonoma County
records, reference to which deed is
hereby expressly made; running thence
north 47°28′ East, along the southerly
boundary line of the land of said
Allegrini a distance of 18.03 chains to
the southeast corner of said Allegrini
property being the point of beginning of
the property hereby conveyed; thence
continuing north 47°28′ East along the
southerly line of the land of Lile
crossing the right of way of the
Northwestern Pacific Railway Company,
a distance of 35.74 chains to a point on
the gravel bar on the Russian River and
being the northeasterly corner of the
land so conveyed as aforesaid by said
Mary M. Markell to Fred J. Daniels;
thence south 36°36′ East, on said gravel
bar 9.78 chains; thence south 47°28′
West, being parallel with the northerly
line of said lands conveyed by said
Mary M. Markell to Fred J. Daniels a
distance of 35.61 chains; thence North
37°19′ West, a distance 9.77 chains to
the place of beginning.
Excepting therefrom 4.50 acres as
conveyed to the city of Cloverdale by
deed recorded July 18, 1940 in book 505
of official records, at page 358, Serial
No. B–21341.
Also excepting therefrom that portion
conveyed to the State of California by
deed recorded November 7, 1974, in
book 2910 of official records, at page
437, Instrument No. P–28163, Sonoma
County Records.
Also excepting therefrom that portion
of the above described property
E:\FR\FM\19MYN1.SGM
19MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 97 (Thursday, May 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31655-31656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11803]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R3-R-2016-N073; FXRS1261030000-167-FF03R02000]
Glacial Ridge National Wildlife Refuge, Polk County, Minnesota;
Draft Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
availability of a draft comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and
environmental assessment (EA) for the Glacial Ridge National Wildlife
Refuge (refuge, NWR) for public review and comment. In this draft CCP/
EA we describe how we propose to manage the refuge for the next 15
years.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive your written comments
by June 20, 2016. We will hold an open house-style meeting during the
comment period to receive comments and provide information on the draft
plan. In addition, we will use special mailings, newspaper articles,
internet postings, and other media announcements to inform people of
opportunities for input.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or requests for more information by any
of the following methods:
Email: r3planning@fws.gov. Include ``Glacial Ridge Draft
CCP/EA'' in the subject line of the message.
Fax: Attention: Refuge Manager, Glacial Ridge NWR, 218-
687-2225.
U.S. Mail: Attention: Refuge Manager, Glacial Ridge NWR,
17788 349th St. SE., Erskine, MN 56535.
In-Person Drop Off: You may drop off comments during
regular business hours at the above addresses.
You will find the draft CCP/EA, as well as information about the
planning process and a summary of the CCP, on the planning Web site at
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/glacialridge/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregg Knutsen, 218-687-2229 x16.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
With this notice, we continue the CCP process for Glacial Ridge
National Wildlife Refuge, which we began by publishing a notice of
intent in the Federal Register (78 FR 3909) on January 17, 2013. For
more about the initial process and the history of this refuge, see that
notice.
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as
amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997
(16 U.S.C. 668dd-668ee) (Administration Act), requires us to develop a
CCP for each national wildlife refuge. The purpose in developing a CCP
is to provide refuge managers with a 15-year strategy for achieving
refuge purposes and contributing toward the mission of the National
Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS), consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation, legal mandates, and Service
policies. In addition to outlining broad management direction on
conserving wildlife and their habitats, CCPs identify wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities available to the public, including
opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental education and interpretation. We will
review and update the CCP at least every 15 years in accordance with
the Administration Act.
Each unit of the NWRS was established for specific purposes. We use
these purposes as the foundation for developing and prioritizing the
management goals and objectives for each refuge within the NWRS
mission, and to determine how the public can use each refuge. The
planning process is a way for us and the public to evaluate management
goals and objectives that will ensure the best possible approach to
wildlife, plant, and habitat conservation, while providing for
wildlife-dependent recreation opportunities that are compatible with
each refuge's establishing purposes and the mission of the NWRS.
Additional Information
The draft CCP/EA may be found at https://www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/glacialridge/. That document incorporates an EA,
prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) (43 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). The draft CCP/EA includes detailed
information about the planning process, refuge, issues, and management
alternatives considered and proposed. The EA includes
[[Page 31656]]
discussions of three alternative refuge management options. The
Service's preferred alternative is reflected in the draft CCP.
The alternatives analyzed in detail include:
Alternative A: Current Management (No Action)--This
alternative reflects the current management direction of Glacial Ridge
NWR. It provides the baseline against which to compare other
alternatives. For NEPA purposes, this is referred to as the ``No
Action'' alternative.
Alternative B: Focused Habitat Management (Preferred
Alternative)--Under this alternative, refuge management actions would
approximate ecological processes that maintained native habitats prior
to European settlement, emphasizing the use of multiple habitat
disturbance regimes (e.g., fire, grazing, mowing). These actions would
maintain and increase the diversity of native vegetation and wildlife
communities that mimic pre-settlement conditions. Management activities
would be ``focused'' via a refuge prioritization effort to maximize the
intended impacts on priority units, given reduced refuge staff and
funding. Public use opportunities would continue with minimal changes.
Staff time and funding would focus on improving opportunities for self-
guided interpretation of refuge habitats and wildlife using existing
infrastructure.
Alternative C: Woody Vegetation Reduction Focus--The focus
of this alternative would be the reduction of invasive woody vegetation
cover (e.g., willow, aspen) across the refuge landscape during the
lifespan of this CCP. The extent of woody cover is increasing due to a
lack of regular vegetative disturbance and other factors. Management
actions would focus on refuge units exhibiting woody vegetation cover
that exceeds the amount found prior to European settlement. Public use
opportunities would continue with minimal change. Staff time and
funding would focus on improving opportunities for self-guided
interpretation of refuge habitats and wildlife using existing
infrastructure.
Public Involvement
We will give the public an opportunity to provide input at a public
meeting. You can obtain the schedule from the address or Web site
listed in this notice (see ADDRESSES). You may also submit comments
anytime during the comment period.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Charles M. Wooley,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 2016-11803 Filed 5-18-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P