Qualified Facility Attestation Using Form FDA 3942a (for Human Food) or Form FDA 3942b (for Animal Food); Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability; Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 30219-30221 [2016-11439]
Download as PDF
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
with longer-term limits on scheduled
and unscheduled operations at JFK,
EWR, and LGA, and requested comment
on options to establish a secondary
market for the purchase, sale, lease, or
trade of slots at these airports, as well
as procedures that would codify the
review of slot transactions arising from
the secondary market for public interest
and anti-competitive effects.
DATES: As of May 16, 2016, the NPRM
published on January 8, 2015 (80 FR
1274) is withdrawn.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 2006,
the FAA issued an Order imposing
temporary limits on operations at LGA
(71 FR 77854), and in 2008, issued
Orders imposing temporary limits on
operations at JFK (73 FR 3510) and EWR
(73 FR 29550). These Orders have been
extended and are in effect until October
29, 2016. On April 6, 2016, the FAA
announced that the current Order at
EWR will expire on October 29, 2016,
and that EWR will be a Level 2,
schedule-facilitated airport under the
Worldwide Slot Guidelines effective for
the Winter 2016 scheduling season (81
FR 19861). By this same announcement,
the FAA indicated that slot-controlled
restrictions at JFK and LGA remain
necessary and that the FAA will extend
these Orders, by separate Federal
Register notices, until October 27, 2018.
On January 8, 2015, the FAA and DOT
published an NPRM (80 FR 1274) that
would replace the FAA’s Orders
limiting scheduled operations at JFK,
EWR, and LGA with a long-term
comprehensive approach to slot
management at these airports. The
NPRM proposed the continuation of the
limits on scheduled and unscheduled
operations in place at each of these
airports under the Orders, and would
have required use of an allocated slot
80% of the time for the same flight or
series of flights. The NPRM also
requested public comment about five
alternatives for a secondary market for
the purchase, sale, lease, or trade of
slots and proposed procedures to codify
the exercise of DOT’s existing authority
to review slot transactions for anticompetitive and public interest effects
arising from those secondary market
transactions that would have been
permitted by the implementation of a
bulletin board for the proposed
secondary market.
Since the FAA and DOT first initiated
this rulemaking effort there have been
significant changes in circumstances
affecting New York City area airports,
including changes in competitive effects
from ongoing industry consolidation,
slot utilization and transfer behavior,
and actual operational performance at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:38 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
the three airports. Furthermore, the FAA
recently announced that slot controls
are no longer needed at EWR (81 FR
19861). The NPRM proposed an
approach to manage slots and the
efficient use of airspace at JFK, EWR,
and LGA that would have treated all
three New York City area airports
similarly. In light of the changes in
market conditions and operational
performance, and particularly the
potential impact of EWR’s change in
status, the Department is withdrawing
the NPRM to allow for further
evaluation of these changes. Withdrawal
of this NPRM (80 FR 1274, January 8,
2015) does not preclude the agency from
issuing future rulemakings on this issue,
nor does it commit the agency to any
course of action in the future. The FAA
will continue to monitor the operational
performance at these airports. Further, if
the Department detects unfair or
anticompetitive behavior, we will not
hesitate to continue to use our existing
authority to take corrective action. We
will also continue to cooperate with the
U.S. Department of Justice on any
reviews it undertakes.
Issued under authority provided by 49
U.S.C. 106(f), 40101, 40103, 40105, and
41712 in Washington, DC on May 6,
2016.
Jenny T. Rosenberg,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Aviation and
International Affairs.
Nan Shellabarger,
Acting Assistant Administrator for Policy,
International Affairs, and Environment.
[FR Doc. 2016–11455 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 117 and 507
[Docket No. FDA–2016–D–1164]
Qualified Facility Attestation Using
Form FDA 3942a (for Human Food) or
Form FDA 3942b (for Animal Food);
Draft Guidance for Industry;
Availability; Agency Information
Collection Activities; Proposed
Collection; Comment Request
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notification of availability.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, we, or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a draft
guidance for industry entitled
‘‘Qualified Facility Attestation Using
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30219
Form FDA 3942a (for Human Food) or
Form FDA 3942b (for Animal Food).’’
This draft guidance explains our current
thinking on how to determine whether
a business is a ‘‘qualified facility’’ that
is subject to modified requirements
under our rule entitled ‘‘Current Good
Manufacturing Practice, Hazard
Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive
Controls for Human Food’’ (the
Preventive Controls for Human Food
Rule) or under our rule entitled
‘‘Current Good Manufacturing Practice,
Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based
Preventive Controls for Food for
Animals’’ (the Preventive Controls for
Animal Food Rule). This draft guidance
also explains our current thinking on
how a business would submit Form
FDA 3942a attesting to its status as a
qualified facility under the Preventive
Controls for Human Food Rule and how
a business would submit Form FDA
3942b attesting to its status as a
qualified facility under the Preventive
Controls for Animal Food Rule. We also
are announcing an opportunity for
public comment on the proposed
collection of information embodied in
Forms FDA 3942a and 3942b. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Federal Agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information and allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that we consider
your comment on this draft guidance
before we begin work on the final
version of the guidance, submit either
electronic or written comments by
November 14, 2016. Submit either
electronic or written comments on the
proposed collection of information by
July 15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
30220
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Division of
Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food
and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management, FDA will post your
comment, as well as any attachments,
except for information submitted,
marked and identified, as confidential,
if submitted as detailed in
‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2016–D–1164 for ‘‘Qualified Facility
Attestation Using Form FDA 3942a (for
Human Food) or Form FDA 3942b (for
Animal Food).’’ Received comments
will be placed in the docket and, except
for those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Division of Dockets Management
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Division of Dockets
Management. If you do not wish your
name and contact information to be
made publicly available, you can
provide this information on the cover
sheet and not in the body of your
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:38 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
comments and you must identify this
information as ‘‘confidential. Any
information marked as ‘‘confidential’’
will not be disclosed except in
accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more
information about FDA’s posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR
56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.fda.gov/
regulatoryinformation/dockets/
default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Division of Dockets
Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single
copies of the draft guidance and
proposed forms to Food and Drug
Administration (HFS–681), 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740.
Send two self-addressed adhesive labels
to assist that office in processing your
request. See the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
With regard to this draft guidance for
human food facility: Jenny Scott, Center
for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
(HFS–300), Food and Drug
Administration, 5100 Paint Branch
Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740, 240–
402–2166.
With regard to this draft guidance for
animal food facility: Jeannette Murphy,
Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV–
200), Food and Drug Administration,
7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,
240–402–6246.
With regard to this proposed
collection of information: FDA PRA
Staff, Office of Operations, Food and
Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville
Rd., COLE–14526, Silver Spring, MD
20993–0002, PRAstaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The FDA Food Safety Modernization
Act (FSMA) (Pub. L. 111–353) enables
FDA to better protect public health by
helping to ensure the safety and security
of the food supply. It enables FDA to
focus more on preventing food safety
problems rather than relying primarily
on reacting to problems after they occur.
FSMA recognizes the important role
industry plays in ensuring the safety of
the food supply, including the adoption
of modern systems of preventive
controls in food production.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section 103 of FSMA amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(the FD&C Act) by adding section 418
(21 U.S.C. 350g) with requirements for
hazard analysis and risk-based
preventive controls for facilities that
produce food for humans or animals.
We have established regulations to
implement these requirements within
subparts C and G of the Preventive
Controls for Human Food rule (21 CFR
part 117) and within subparts C and E
of the Preventive Controls for Animal
Food Rule (21 CFR part 507). A business
that meets the definition of a ‘‘qualified
facility’’ (see 21 CFR 117.3 or 21 CFR
507.3) is subject to modified
requirements in § 117.201 of the
Preventive Controls for Human Food
Rule or in § 507.7 of the Preventive
Controls for Animal Food Rule. These
modified requirements require the
business to submit a form to FDA,
attesting to its status as a qualified
facility. Section 418(l)(2)(B)(ii) of the
FD&C Act directs FDA to issue a
guidance related to the documents
required to be submitted to FDA to
show status as a qualified facility.
In accordance with section
418(l)(2)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act, we are
announcing the availability of a draft
guidance for industry on qualified
facility attestation. Section II of this
draft guidance explains how to
determine whether your business meets
the definition of ‘‘qualified facility’’
under the Preventive Controls for
Human Food Rule and how to submit
Form FDA 3942a: Qualified Facility
Attestation for Human Food Facility,
attesting to its status as a qualified
facility under the Preventive Controls
for Human Food Rule. Section III of this
draft guidance explains how to
determine whether your business meets
the definition of ‘‘qualified facility’’
under the Preventive Controls for
Animal Food Rule and how to submit
Form FDA 3942b: Qualified Facility
Attestation for Animal Food Facility,
attesting to its status as a qualified
facility under the Preventive Controls
for Animal Food Rule.
Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520), Federal Agencies must obtain
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
30221
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Proposed Rules
proposed collection of information
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, we also are publishing this
notice of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document
and seeking public comment.
II. Significance of Guidance
This level 1 draft guidance is being
issued consistent with FDA’s good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR
10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the current
thinking of FDA on Qualified Facility
Attestation Using Form FDA 3942a (for
Human Food) or Form FDA 3942b (for
Animal Food). It does not establish any
rights for any person and is not binding
on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The draft guidance entitled ‘‘Qualified
Facility Attestation Using Form FDA
3942a (for Human Food) or Form FDA
3942b (for Animal Food)’’ contains
information collection provisions that
are subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). A
description of these provisions is given
below with an estimate of the associated
annual reporting burden. Included in
the estimate is the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing each collection of
information.
We invite comments on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Title: Qualified Facility Attestation
Using Form FDA 3942a (for Human
Food) or Form FDA 3942b (for Animal
Food).
Description: This draft guidance
describes FDA procedures regarding the
submission of attestations as established
under both the Preventive Controls for
Human Food Rule and Preventive
Controls for Animal Food Rule.
Proposed forms FDA 3942a and FDA
3942b have been developed for use by
a business in reporting its status as a
‘‘qualified facility’’ under the applicable
regulations.
Description of Respondents:
Respondents to the collection of
information are owners, operators or
agents in charge of domestic or foreign
facilities that manufacture, process,
pack, or hold food for human or animal
consumption in the United States
asserting that a facility is a ‘‘qualified
facility’’ under applicable FDA
regulations.
We estimate the burden for this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN 1
Guidance section
Number of
respondents
FDA form
Number of
responses per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Average burden per
response
Total hours
Section II; Human Food ...............
Section III; Animal Food ..............
3942a
3942b
37,134
1,120
0.5
0.5
18,567
560
0.5 (30 minutes) ........
0.5 (30 minutes) ........
9,284
280
Total ......................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
....................................
9,564
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
1 There
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Consistent with the estimates found
in our Preventive Controls for Human
Food Rule, we calculate that
approximately 37,134 human food
facilities will spend approximately 30
minutes (0.5 hour) reporting their status
as such to FDA every 2 years. Thus,
dividing this figure by 2 to determine
the annual burden, we estimate there
will be a total of 18,567 responses and
a total of 9,284 burden hours associated
with this collection element.
Similarly, and consistent with the
estimates found in our Preventive
Controls for Animal Food Rule, we
estimate that approximately 1,120
animal food facilities will spend
approximately 30 minutes (0.5 hour)
reporting their status as such to FDA
every 2 years. Thus, dividing this figure
by 2 to determine an annual burden, we
estimate there will be a total of 560
responses and a total of 280 burden
hours associated with this information
collection element.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:38 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
This draft guidance also refers to
previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations.
The collections of information in part
117 have been approved under OMB
control number 0910–0751. The
collections of information in part 507
have been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0789.
Dated: May 10, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
IV. Electronic Access
Coast Guard
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the draft guidance,
including its appendices containing
instructions for filling out Forms FDA
3942a and 3942b and the proposed
Forms FDA 3942a and 3942b, at either
https://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances or
https://www.regulations.gov. Use the
FDA Web site listed in the previous
sentence to find the most current
version of the guidance.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[FR Doc. 2016–11439 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0185]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Beaufort
Water Festival, Beaufort, SC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a special local regulation on
the waters of the Beaufort River,
Beaufort, South Carolina, during the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16MYP1.SGM
16MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30219-30221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11439]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Parts 117 and 507
[Docket No. FDA-2016-D-1164]
Qualified Facility Attestation Using Form FDA 3942a (for Human
Food) or Form FDA 3942b (for Animal Food); Draft Guidance for Industry;
Availability; Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed
Collection; Comment Request
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notification of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, we, or Agency) is
announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled
``Qualified Facility Attestation Using Form FDA 3942a (for Human Food)
or Form FDA 3942b (for Animal Food).'' This draft guidance explains our
current thinking on how to determine whether a business is a
``qualified facility'' that is subject to modified requirements under
our rule entitled ``Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard
Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food'' (the
Preventive Controls for Human Food Rule) or under our rule entitled
``Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based
Preventive Controls for Food for Animals'' (the Preventive Controls for
Animal Food Rule). This draft guidance also explains our current
thinking on how a business would submit Form FDA 3942a attesting to its
status as a qualified facility under the Preventive Controls for Human
Food Rule and how a business would submit Form FDA 3942b attesting to
its status as a qualified facility under the Preventive Controls for
Animal Food Rule. We also are announcing an opportunity for public
comment on the proposed collection of information embodied in Forms FDA
3942a and 3942b. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA),
Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of information and allow 60 days
for public comment in response to the notice.
DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that we consider your comment on this draft
guidance before we begin work on the final version of the guidance,
submit either electronic or written comments by November 14, 2016.
Submit either electronic or written comments on the proposed collection
of information by July 15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or
[[Page 30220]]
confidential business information, such as a manufacturing process.
Please note that if you include your name, contact information, or
other information that identifies you in the body of your comments,
that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2016-D-1164 for ``Qualified Facility Attestation Using Form FDA
3942a (for Human Food) or Form FDA 3942b (for Animal Food).'' Received
comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted
as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential. Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not be
disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable
disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of comments to
public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the
information at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance and
proposed forms to Food and Drug Administration (HFS-681), 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740. Send two self-addressed adhesive
labels to assist that office in processing your request. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the draft
guidance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
With regard to this draft guidance for human food facility: Jenny
Scott, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-300), Food and
Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,
240-402-2166.
With regard to this draft guidance for animal food facility:
Jeannette Murphy, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-200), Food and
Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240-402-
6246.
With regard to this proposed collection of information: FDA PRA
Staff, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, 8455
Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,
PRAstaff@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) (Pub. L. 111-353)
enables FDA to better protect public health by helping to ensure the
safety and security of the food supply. It enables FDA to focus more on
preventing food safety problems rather than relying primarily on
reacting to problems after they occur. FSMA recognizes the important
role industry plays in ensuring the safety of the food supply,
including the adoption of modern systems of preventive controls in food
production.
Section 103 of FSMA amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the FD&C Act) by adding section 418 (21 U.S.C. 350g) with
requirements for hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls for
facilities that produce food for humans or animals. We have established
regulations to implement these requirements within subparts C and G of
the Preventive Controls for Human Food rule (21 CFR part 117) and
within subparts C and E of the Preventive Controls for Animal Food Rule
(21 CFR part 507). A business that meets the definition of a
``qualified facility'' (see 21 CFR 117.3 or 21 CFR 507.3) is subject to
modified requirements in Sec. 117.201 of the Preventive Controls for
Human Food Rule or in Sec. 507.7 of the Preventive Controls for Animal
Food Rule. These modified requirements require the business to submit a
form to FDA, attesting to its status as a qualified facility. Section
418(l)(2)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act directs FDA to issue a guidance
related to the documents required to be submitted to FDA to show status
as a qualified facility.
In accordance with section 418(l)(2)(B)(ii) of the FD&C Act, we are
announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry on
qualified facility attestation. Section II of this draft guidance
explains how to determine whether your business meets the definition of
``qualified facility'' under the Preventive Controls for Human Food
Rule and how to submit Form FDA 3942a: Qualified Facility Attestation
for Human Food Facility, attesting to its status as a qualified
facility under the Preventive Controls for Human Food Rule. Section III
of this draft guidance explains how to determine whether your business
meets the definition of ``qualified facility'' under the Preventive
Controls for Animal Food Rule and how to submit Form FDA 3942b:
Qualified Facility Attestation for Animal Food Facility, attesting to
its status as a qualified facility under the Preventive Controls for
Animal Food Rule.
Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal Agencies must obtain
approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each
collection of information they conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of
information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and
includes Agency requests or requirements that members of the public
submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires
Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register
concerning each
[[Page 30221]]
proposed collection of information before submitting the collection to
OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, we also are
publishing this notice of the proposed collection of information set
forth in this document and seeking public comment.
II. Significance of Guidance
This level 1 draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's
good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance,
when finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on Qualified
Facility Attestation Using Form FDA 3942a (for Human Food) or Form FDA
3942b (for Animal Food). It does not establish any rights for any
person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable
statutes and regulations.
III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The draft guidance entitled ``Qualified Facility Attestation Using
Form FDA 3942a (for Human Food) or Form FDA 3942b (for Animal Food)''
contains information collection provisions that are subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the PRA (44 U.S.C.
3501-3520). A description of these provisions is given below with an
estimate of the associated annual reporting burden. Included in the
estimate is the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing
data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing
and reviewing each collection of information.
We invite comments on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's functions,
including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) the
accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques, when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Title: Qualified Facility Attestation Using Form FDA 3942a (for
Human Food) or Form FDA 3942b (for Animal Food).
Description: This draft guidance describes FDA procedures regarding
the submission of attestations as established under both the Preventive
Controls for Human Food Rule and Preventive Controls for Animal Food
Rule. Proposed forms FDA 3942a and FDA 3942b have been developed for
use by a business in reporting its status as a ``qualified facility''
under the applicable regulations.
Description of Respondents: Respondents to the collection of
information are owners, operators or agents in charge of domestic or
foreign facilities that manufacture, process, pack, or hold food for
human or animal consumption in the United States asserting that a
facility is a ``qualified facility'' under applicable FDA regulations.
We estimate the burden for this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of
Guidance section FDA form Number of responses per Total annual Average burden per response Total hours
respondents respondent responses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section II; Human Food.............. 3942a 37,134 0.5 18,567 0.5 (30 minutes).................. 9,284
Section III; Animal Food............ 3942b 1,120 0.5 560 0.5 (30 minutes).................. 280
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................... .............. .............. .............. .............. .................................. 9,564
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
Consistent with the estimates found in our Preventive Controls for
Human Food Rule, we calculate that approximately 37,134 human food
facilities will spend approximately 30 minutes (0.5 hour) reporting
their status as such to FDA every 2 years. Thus, dividing this figure
by 2 to determine the annual burden, we estimate there will be a total
of 18,567 responses and a total of 9,284 burden hours associated with
this collection element.
Similarly, and consistent with the estimates found in our
Preventive Controls for Animal Food Rule, we estimate that
approximately 1,120 animal food facilities will spend approximately 30
minutes (0.5 hour) reporting their status as such to FDA every 2 years.
Thus, dividing this figure by 2 to determine an annual burden, we
estimate there will be a total of 560 responses and a total of 280
burden hours associated with this information collection element.
This draft guidance also refers to previously approved collections
of information found in FDA regulations. The collections of information
in part 117 have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0751. The
collections of information in part 507 have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0789.
IV. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the draft guidance,
including its appendices containing instructions for filling out Forms
FDA 3942a and 3942b and the proposed Forms FDA 3942a and 3942b, at
either https://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances or https://www.regulations.gov.
Use the FDA Web site listed in the previous sentence to find the most
current version of the guidance.
Dated: May 10, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-11439 Filed 5-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P