Army Science Board Request for Information on Robotic and Autonomous Systems-of-Systems (RAS) Technology Initiatives, 30264-30265 [2016-11417]
Download as PDF
30264
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
parties. For example, a consumer who is
not allowed to have visitors at work may
suffer adverse employment
consequences as a result of these visits,
regardless of whether there is a risk of
disclosure to third parties. Further, if
the likely or actual consequence of the
visits is to harass the consumer, an inperson collection visit may also be
likely to cause substantial injury to the
consumer.
Finally, the bulletin also notes that
third-party debt collectors and others
subject to the FDCPA engaging in inperson collection visits risk violating
certain provisions of the FDCPA, such
as section 805(b) of the FDCPA’s
prohibition on communicating with
third parties in connection with the
collection of any debt (subject to certain
exceptions).
4.2.3 Bulletin on Requirements for
Consumer Authorizations for
Preauthorized Electronic Fund Transfers
On November 23, 2015, the CFPB
released bulletin 2015–06, which
reminds entities of their obligations
under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act
(EFTA) and its implementing regulation,
Regulation E, when obtaining consumer
authorizations for preauthorized
electronic fund transfers (EFTs) from a
consumer’s account. The bulletin
explains that oral recordings obtained
over the phone may authorize
preauthorized EFTs under Regulation E
provided that these recordings also
comply with the E-Sign Act. Further,
the bulletin outlines entities’ obligations
to provide a copy of the terms of
preauthorized EFT authorizations to
consumers, summarizes the current law,
highlights relevant supervisory findings,
and articulates the CFPB’s expectations
for entities obtaining consumer
authorizations for preauthorized EFTs to
help them ensure their compliance with
Federal consumer financial law.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
The CFPB recognizes the value of
communicating program findings to
CFPB-supervised entities to aid them in
their efforts to comply with Federal
consumer financial law, and to other
stakeholders to foster better
understanding of the CFPB’s work.
To this end, the Bureau remains
committed to publishing its Supervisory
Highlights report periodically in order
to share information regarding general
supervisory and examination findings
(without identifying specific
institutions, except in the case of public
enforcement actions), to communicate
operational changes to the program, and
to provide a convenient and easily
18:48 May 13, 2016
6. Regulatory Requirements
This Supervisory Highlights
summarizes existing requirements
under the law, summarizes findings
made in the course of exercising the
Bureau’s supervisory and enforcement
authority, and is a non-binding general
statement of policy articulating
considerations relevant to the Bureau’s
exercise of its supervisory and
enforcement authority. It is therefore
exempt from notice and comment
rulemaking requirements under the
Administrative Procedure Act pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 553(b). Because no notice of
proposed rulemaking is required, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act does not
require an initial or final regulatory
flexibility analysis. 5 U.S.C. 603(a),
604(a). The Bureau has determined that
this Supervisory Highlights does not
impose any new or revise any existing
recordkeeping, reporting, or disclosure
requirements on covered entities or
members of the public that would be
collections of information requiring
OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
Dated: May 10, 2016.
Richard Cordray,
Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2016–11423 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Army Science Board Request for
Information on Robotic and
Autonomous Systems-of-Systems
(RAS) Technology Initiatives
Department of the Army, DoD.
Request for information
regarding support to Army RAS
Competencies.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
5. Conclusion
VerDate Sep<11>2014
accessible resource for information on
the CFPB’s guidance documents.
Jkt 238001
Pursuant to the Federal
Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5
U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the
Sunshine in Government Act of 1976
(U.S.C. 552b, as amended) and 41 Code
of the Federal Regulations (CFR 102–
3.140 through 160) the Department of
the Army requests industry information
on products, science and technology
(S&T) research, operational concepts,
and mission support innovations to
support Army RAS competencies. No
funds are available for any proposal or
information submission and submitting
information does not bind the Army for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
any future contracts/grants resulting
from this request for information.
The Army Science Board is requesting
information from organizations external
to the Army that will help the board
complete its analysis and ensure that all
viable sources of information are
explored. Based on information
submitted in response to this request,
the Army Science Board may invite
selected organizations to provide
additional information on technologies
of interest.
To supplement the information
developed in previous studies and
otherwise available to the Board,
organizations are invited to submit
information on products or technologies
to support RAS competencies and can
be developed externally, either with
support from the Army or from other
sources.
Specific information requested from
industry on RAS products or technology
(including Unmanned Air Systems
(UAS) or Unmanned Ground Vehicles
(UGV)) that companies are offering, or
plan to offer, to government, civil or
commercial customers is: Identification
of the product and its capabilities;
Description of the product or
technology, including on-board
processing architecture and
functionality (e.g., vehicle guidance,
navigation and control, sensor
processing); Description of the current
autonomous functionality and
capabilities (e.g., waypoint navigation,
sensor management, perception/
reasoning); Description of plans to
increase autonomy and changes, if any,
to on-board processing architecture/
functionality enabling greater
autonomy; Description of the HumanRAS collaboration capabilities, or
planned capabilities, and changes, if
any, to on-board processing
architecture/functionality enabling
greater human-RAS collaboration;
Assessment of utility of current, or
planned, products or technologies to
Army applications and missions.
ADDRESSES: Written submissions are to
be submitted to the: Army Science
Board, ATTN: Designated Federal
Officer, 2530 Crystal Drive, Suite 7098,
Arlington, VA 22202.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTC
Stephen K Barker at
stephen.k.barker.mil@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. The Terms of Reference
(ToR) provided by the Office of the
Secretary of the Army directs the Army
Science Board (ASB) to undertake a
2016 Study on ‘‘Robotic and
Autonomous Systems-of-Systems
Architecture.’’
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Notices
In accordance with the ToR, this
study will analyze and identify the
Army formations with the greatest
potential to benefit from adoption of
RAS technology in both the near term
(7–10 years) and the long term (10–25
years). For each selected application,
the study team should define the
benefits of RAS, considering such
factors as cost, manpower reduction,
survivability, and mission effectiveness.
To the extent possible, the team should
make maximum use of existing
platforms available in the Army, other
Services, or commercially. Among the
concepts being studied by the study
team, for which it is seeking input are
on relevant products and technologies
are: Counter Integrated Air Defense
(IAD) System; Counter Armor and
Counter Fires System; Combat Aviation
Wingman; Manned-Unmanned Armor
Platoon; Multi-Mission Aerial layer
System; Soldier Situational Awareness
(SA) System; and Point of Need
Sustainment. This is not an exhaustive
list. Other concepts are of interest as
well.
Submission Instructions and Format:
To respond to this request for
information, interested parties should
submit all information detailed below.
Packages must be submitted by Friday,
May 27, 2016 by 4 p.m. Eastern
Standard Time. Submissions should
briefly summarize the technologies
within a maximum of four pages (as
broken down in paragraphs b, c, and d
below), excluding quad chart, figures,
references and the cover page. No
proprietary information should be
included in the responses. Submissions
require both a CD and a hard copy of the
response. The size of the CD submission
will be limited to 20 MB. The hard copy
format specifications include 12 point
font, single-spaced, single-sided, 8.5 by
11 inches paper, with a 1 inch margin.
a. Cover Page (1 page only):
Title
Industry
Respondent’s technical and
administrative points of contact (names,
addresses, phone and fax numbers, and
email addresses).
b. Abstract (1 page only): Summarize
product or technology solutions and
how they support Army RAS
competencies. Respondents are
encouraged to be as succinct as possible
while providing sufficient detail to
adequately convey the product or
technology solutions.
c. Product or Technology Description
(4 pages maximum): Provide an
enhanced view of the product or
technology solution you are proposing,
focusing on the advantages of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:48 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
product or technology and its
applicability to future Army RAS
competencies. The description of each
solution should include the current
state of development and the predicted
performance levels the product or
technology should reasonably achieve.
Of most interest to this study is a
description of the current autonomous
functionality of the product, the types of
human-RAS collaboration that are
supported by the product, any plans to
increase autonomy and collaboration,
and changes required to the on-board
processing architecture needed to
enable these planned improvements.
d. Applicability to Future Army RAS
competency (1 page only): Identify and
expound upon how the product or
technology supports the seven Study
Concept areas mentioned above,
concentrating on the added capability
this solution provides that currently
does not exist.
All Proposers should review the
NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY
PROGRAM OPERATING MANUAL,
(NISPOM), dated February 28, 2006, as
it provides the baseline standards for
the protection of classified information
and prescribes the requirements
concerning Contractor Development
information under paragraph 4–105.
Defense Security Service (DSS) Site for
the NISPOM is: https://www.dss.mil/isp/
fac_clear/download_nispom.html.
Unclassified white papers/CDs must
be mailed to the POC listed (see
ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT). Proposers who
intend to include classified information
or data in their white paper submission
or who are unsure about the appropriate
classification of their white papers
should contact the POC for guidance
and direction in advance of preparation
at phone number (703) 545–8652.
A listing of respondents and whether
or not their submission was utilized will
be made available for public inspection
upon request. Open deliberation by the
full committee is anticipated on or
about July 18, 2016 in Irvine, CA. This
meeting will be preceded by standard
Federal Register notification.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016–11417 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
Charter Renewal of Department of
Defense Federal Advisory Committees
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Department of Defense.
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30265
Renewal of Federal Advisory
Committee.
ACTION:
The Department of Defense
(DoD) is publishing this notice to
announce that it is renewing the charter
for the Threat Reduction Advisory
Committee (‘‘the Committee’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jim
Freeman, Advisory Committee
Management Officer for the Department
of Defense, 703–692–5952.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
committee’s charter is being renewed in
accordance with the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA) of 1972 (5
U.S.C., Appendix, as amended) and 41
CFR 102–3.50(d). The charter and
contact information for the Committee’s
Designated Federal Officer (DFO) can be
obtained at https://
www.facadatabase.gov/.
The Committee provides the Secretary
of Defense and the Deputy Secretary of
Defense, through the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition, Technology,
and Logistics and the Assistant
Secretary of Defense for Nuclear,
Chemical, and Biological Defense
Programs, independent advice and
recommendations on matters relating to
combating Weapons of Mass Destruction
(WMD). The Committee shall be
composed of no more than 25 members
who are eminent authorities in the
fields of national defense, geopolitical
and national security affairs, WMD,
nuclear physics, chemistry, and biology.
Members who are not full-time or
permanent part-time Federal officers or
employees are appointed as experts or
consultants pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3109 to
serve as special government employee
members. Members who are full-time or
permanent part-time Federal officers or
employees are appointed pursuant to 41
CFR 102–3.130(a) to serve as regular
government employee members. Each
member is appointed to provide advice
on behalf of the Government on the
basis of their best judgment without
representing any particular point of
view and in a manner that is free from
conflict of interest. Except for
reimbursement of official Committeerelated travel and per diem, members
serve without compensation. The DoD,
as necessary and consistent with the
Committee’s mission and DoD policies
and procedures, may establish
subcommittees, task forces, or working
groups to support the Committee, and
all subcommittees must operate under
the provisions of FACA and the
Government in the Sunshine Act.
Subcommittees will not work
independently of the Committee and
must report all recommendations and
advice solely to the Committee for full
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30264-30265]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11417]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army
Army Science Board Request for Information on Robotic and
Autonomous Systems-of-Systems (RAS) Technology Initiatives
AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.
ACTION: Request for information regarding support to Army RAS
Competencies.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5
U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Sunshine in Government Act of 1976
(U.S.C. 552b, as amended) and 41 Code of the Federal Regulations (CFR
102-3.140 through 160) the Department of the Army requests industry
information on products, science and technology (S&T) research,
operational concepts, and mission support innovations to support Army
RAS competencies. No funds are available for any proposal or
information submission and submitting information does not bind the
Army for any future contracts/grants resulting from this request for
information.
The Army Science Board is requesting information from organizations
external to the Army that will help the board complete its analysis and
ensure that all viable sources of information are explored. Based on
information submitted in response to this request, the Army Science
Board may invite selected organizations to provide additional
information on technologies of interest.
To supplement the information developed in previous studies and
otherwise available to the Board, organizations are invited to submit
information on products or technologies to support RAS competencies and
can be developed externally, either with support from the Army or from
other sources.
Specific information requested from industry on RAS products or
technology (including Unmanned Air Systems (UAS) or Unmanned Ground
Vehicles (UGV)) that companies are offering, or plan to offer, to
government, civil or commercial customers is: Identification of the
product and its capabilities; Description of the product or technology,
including on-board processing architecture and functionality (e.g.,
vehicle guidance, navigation and control, sensor processing);
Description of the current autonomous functionality and capabilities
(e.g., waypoint navigation, sensor management, perception/reasoning);
Description of plans to increase autonomy and changes, if any, to on-
board processing architecture/functionality enabling greater autonomy;
Description of the Human-RAS collaboration capabilities, or planned
capabilities, and changes, if any, to on-board processing architecture/
functionality enabling greater human-RAS collaboration; Assessment of
utility of current, or planned, products or technologies to Army
applications and missions.
ADDRESSES: Written submissions are to be submitted to the: Army Science
Board, ATTN: Designated Federal Officer, 2530 Crystal Drive, Suite
7098, Arlington, VA 22202.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LTC Stephen K Barker at
stephen.k.barker.mil@mail.mil">stephen.k.barker.mil@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background. The Terms of Reference (ToR) provided by the Office of
the Secretary of the Army directs the Army Science Board (ASB) to
undertake a 2016 Study on ``Robotic and Autonomous Systems-of-Systems
Architecture.''
[[Page 30265]]
In accordance with the ToR, this study will analyze and identify
the Army formations with the greatest potential to benefit from
adoption of RAS technology in both the near term (7-10 years) and the
long term (10-25 years). For each selected application, the study team
should define the benefits of RAS, considering such factors as cost,
manpower reduction, survivability, and mission effectiveness. To the
extent possible, the team should make maximum use of existing platforms
available in the Army, other Services, or commercially. Among the
concepts being studied by the study team, for which it is seeking input
are on relevant products and technologies are: Counter Integrated Air
Defense (IAD) System; Counter Armor and Counter Fires System; Combat
Aviation Wingman; Manned-Unmanned Armor Platoon; Multi-Mission Aerial
layer System; Soldier Situational Awareness (SA) System; and Point of
Need Sustainment. This is not an exhaustive list. Other concepts are of
interest as well.
Submission Instructions and Format: To respond to this request for
information, interested parties should submit all information detailed
below. Packages must be submitted by Friday, May 27, 2016 by 4 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time. Submissions should briefly summarize the
technologies within a maximum of four pages (as broken down in
paragraphs b, c, and d below), excluding quad chart, figures,
references and the cover page. No proprietary information should be
included in the responses. Submissions require both a CD and a hard
copy of the response. The size of the CD submission will be limited to
20 MB. The hard copy format specifications include 12 point font,
single-spaced, single-sided, 8.5 by 11 inches paper, with a 1 inch
margin.
a. Cover Page (1 page only):
Title
Industry
Respondent's technical and administrative points of contact (names,
addresses, phone and fax numbers, and email addresses).
b. Abstract (1 page only): Summarize product or technology
solutions and how they support Army RAS competencies. Respondents are
encouraged to be as succinct as possible while providing sufficient
detail to adequately convey the product or technology solutions.
c. Product or Technology Description (4 pages maximum): Provide an
enhanced view of the product or technology solution you are proposing,
focusing on the advantages of the product or technology and its
applicability to future Army RAS competencies. The description of each
solution should include the current state of development and the
predicted performance levels the product or technology should
reasonably achieve. Of most interest to this study is a description of
the current autonomous functionality of the product, the types of
human-RAS collaboration that are supported by the product, any plans to
increase autonomy and collaboration, and changes required to the on-
board processing architecture needed to enable these planned
improvements.
d. Applicability to Future Army RAS competency (1 page only):
Identify and expound upon how the product or technology supports the
seven Study Concept areas mentioned above, concentrating on the added
capability this solution provides that currently does not exist.
All Proposers should review the NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL SECURITY
PROGRAM OPERATING MANUAL, (NISPOM), dated February 28, 2006, as it
provides the baseline standards for the protection of classified
information and prescribes the requirements concerning Contractor
Development information under paragraph 4-105. Defense Security Service
(DSS) Site for the NISPOM is: https://www.dss.mil/isp/fac_clear/download_nispom.html.
Unclassified white papers/CDs must be mailed to the POC listed (see
ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Proposers who intend to
include classified information or data in their white paper submission
or who are unsure about the appropriate classification of their white
papers should contact the POC for guidance and direction in advance of
preparation at phone number (703) 545-8652.
A listing of respondents and whether or not their submission was
utilized will be made available for public inspection upon request.
Open deliberation by the full committee is anticipated on or about July
18, 2016 in Irvine, CA. This meeting will be preceded by standard
Federal Register notification.
Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-11417 Filed 5-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-03-P