Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Oregon: Interstate Transport of Lead and Nitrogen Dioxide, 30181-30182 [2016-11380]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Enforcement period. This rule is
effective and will be enforced from 10
p.m. until 11 p.m. on June 17, 2016.
(e) Information broadcasts. The COTP
or the COTP’s representative will inform
the public through broadcast notices to
mariners of the enforcement period for
the safety zone as well as any changes
in the planned schedule.
Dated: May 9, 2016.
M. L. Malloy,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Upper Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2016–11569 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0136]
Safety Zone; Fourth of July Fireworks,
Crescent City, Crescent City Harbor,
Crescent City, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
the safety zone for the Crescent City
Fourth of July Fireworks display in the
Captain of the Port, San Francisco area
of responsibility during the dates and
times noted below. This action is
necessary to protect life and property of
the maritime public from the hazards
associated with the fireworks display.
During the enforcement period,
unauthorized persons or vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring in the safety zone,
unless authorized by the Patrol
Commander (PATCOM).
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.1191, Table 1, Item number 4 will
be enforced from 9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m.
on July 4, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice of
enforcement, call or email Lieutenant
Junior Grade Christina Ramirez, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Francisco;
telephone (415) 399–3585 or email at
D11-PF-MarineEvents@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the safety zone
established in 33 CFR 165.1191, Table 1,
Item number 4 on July 4, 2016. Upon
commencement of the 30 minute
fireworks display, scheduled to begin at
9:30 p.m. on July 4, 2016, the safety
zone will encompass the navigable
waters surrounding the land-based
launch site on the West Jetty of Crescent
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
City Harbor within a radius of 700 feet
in approximate position 41°44′41″ N,
124°11′59″ W (NAD 83) for the Fourth
of July Fireworks, Crescent City in 33
CFR 165.1191, Table 1, Item number 4.
Upon the conclusion of the fireworks
display the safety zone shall terminate.
This safety zone will be in effect from
9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2016.
Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.1191, unauthorized persons or
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring in
the safety zone during all applicable
effective dates and times, unless
authorized to do so by the PATCOM.
Additionally, each person who receives
notice of a lawful order or direction
issued by an official patrol vessel shall
obey the order or direction. The
PATCOM is empowered to forbid entry
into and control the regulated area. The
PATCOM shall be designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector San
Francisco. The PATCOM may, upon
request, allow the transit of commercial
vessels through regulated areas when it
is safe to do so.
This notice of enforcement is issued
under authority of 33 CFR 165.1191 and
5 U.S.C. 552 (a). In addition to this
notice of enforcement in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard plans to
provide the maritime community with
notification of the safety zone and its
enforcement period via the Local Notice
to Mariners.
If the Captain of the Port determines
that the regulated area need not be
enforced for the full duration stated in
this notice, a Broadcast Notice to
Mariners may be used to grant general
permission to enter the regulated area.
Dated: April 20, 2016.
Gregory G. Stump,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. 2016–11490 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
30181
(SIP) to contain adequate provisions
prohibiting air emissions that will have
certain adverse air quality effects in
other states. On October 20, 2015, the
State of Oregon made a submittal to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
to address these requirements. The EPA
is approving the submittal as meeting
the requirements that each SIP contain
adequate provisions to prohibit
emissions that will contribute
significantly to nonattainment or
interfere with maintenance of the 2008
lead (Pb) and 2010 nitrogen dioxide
(NO2) National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) in any other state.
DATES: This final rule is effective June
15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2016–0050. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information the disclosure
of which is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet
and will be publicly available only in
hard copy form. Publicly available
docket materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air Programs Unit, Office of Air,
Waste and Toxics, EPA Region 10, 1200
Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. The
EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristin Hall at (206) 553–6357,
hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA,
Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
40 CFR Part 52
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
[EPA–R10–OAR–2016–0050; FRL–9946–39–
Region 10]
I. Background Information
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Oregon:
Interstate Transport of Lead and
Nitrogen Dioxide
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Clean Air Act (CAA)
requires each State Implementation Plan
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
On October 20, 2015, Oregon made a
submittal to address the interstate
transport requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for multiple NAAQS,
including the 2008 Pb and 2010 NO2
NAAQS. On March 11, 2016, the EPA
proposed to approve the submittal as
meeting the interstate transport
requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 Pb and
2010 NO2 NAAQS (81 FR 12849). An
E:\FR\FM\16MYR1.SGM
16MYR1
30182
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 94 / Monday, May 16, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
explanation of the CAA requirements, a
detailed analysis of the submittal, and
the EPA’s reasons for approval were
provided in the proposal and will not
restated here. The public comment
period for the proposal ended on April
11, 2016. The EPA received no
comments.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving Oregon’s
October 20, 2015 submittal as meeting
the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
interstate transport requirements for the
2008 Pb and 2010 NO2 NAAQS. The
remainder of the submittal, with respect
to the 2010 sulfur dioxide and 2012 fine
particulate matter NAAQS, will be
addressed in separate, future actions.
III. Statutory and Executive Orders
Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:36 May 13, 2016
Jkt 238001
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
this action does not involve technical
standards; and
• does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by July 15, 2016. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section
307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: May 4, 2016.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart MM—Oregon
2. Section 52.1991 is amended by
adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1991 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure
requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) The EPA approves Oregon’s
October 20, 2015 submittal as meeting
the requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 lead and
2010 nitrogen dioxide NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2016–11380 Filed 5–13–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0360; FRL–9946–32–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AR47
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants: Off-Site
Waste and Recovery Operations:
Action Denying a Petition for
Reconsideration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of action denying a
petition for reconsideration.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is providing notice that it
has responded to a petition for
reconsideration of a final rule published
in the Federal Register on March 18,
2015. The rule promulgated
amendments to the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(NESHAP): Off-Site Waste and Recovery
Operations (OSWRO) based on our
residual risk and technology review
(RTR) conducted for the OSWRO source
category. The agency previously granted
reconsideration of one issue raised in
the petition. The Administrator denied
the second issue raised in the petition
in letters to the petitioners dated May 5,
2016.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16MYR1.SGM
16MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30181-30182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11380]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2016-0050; FRL-9946-39-Region 10]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Oregon:
Interstate Transport of Lead and Nitrogen Dioxide
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires each State Implementation
Plan (SIP) to contain adequate provisions prohibiting air emissions
that will have certain adverse air quality effects in other states. On
October 20, 2015, the State of Oregon made a submittal to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to address these requirements.
The EPA is approving the submittal as meeting the requirements that
each SIP contain adequate provisions to prohibit emissions that will
contribute significantly to nonattainment or interfere with maintenance
of the 2008 lead (Pb) and 2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2)
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in any other state.
DATES: This final rule is effective June 15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2016-0050. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material,
such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Programs Unit, Office of
Air, Waste and Toxics, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA
98101. The EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy of the
docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristin Hall at (206) 553-6357,
hall.kristin@epa.gov, or the above EPA, Region 10 address.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background Information
II. Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
I. Background Information
On October 20, 2015, Oregon made a submittal to address the
interstate transport requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for
multiple NAAQS, including the 2008 Pb and 2010 NO2 NAAQS. On
March 11, 2016, the EPA proposed to approve the submittal as meeting
the interstate transport requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
for the 2008 Pb and 2010 NO2 NAAQS (81 FR 12849). An
[[Page 30182]]
explanation of the CAA requirements, a detailed analysis of the
submittal, and the EPA's reasons for approval were provided in the
proposal and will not restated here. The public comment period for the
proposal ended on April 11, 2016. The EPA received no comments.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving Oregon's October 20, 2015 submittal as meeting
the CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) interstate transport requirements
for the 2008 Pb and 2010 NO2 NAAQS. The remainder of the
submittal, with respect to the 2010 sulfur dioxide and 2012 fine
particulate matter NAAQS, will be addressed in separate, future
actions.
III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because this action does not involve technical standards; and
does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 15, 2016. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 4, 2016.
Dennis J. McLerran,
Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart MM--Oregon
0
2. Section 52.1991 is amended by adding paragraph (e) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.1991 Section 110(a)(2) infrastructure requirements.
* * * * *
(e) The EPA approves Oregon's October 20, 2015 submittal as meeting
the requirements of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) for the 2008 lead
and 2010 nitrogen dioxide NAAQS.
[FR Doc. 2016-11380 Filed 5-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P