Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Energy Gateway South Transmission Project and Proposed Land-Use Plan Amendments, 29912-29915 [2016-11371]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
29912
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2016 / Notices
neighborhood, called Davis District,
west of Dahlonega, Georgia. Only one of
these families—‘‘the Davises’’—were
Cherokee descendants and only their
descendants are enrolled in GTEC.
Therefore, the GTEC petitioner does not
meet criterion 83.7(b).
Criterion (c) requires that the
petitioner has maintained political
influence or authority over its members
as an autonomous entity from historical
times until the present. The petitioner’s
ancestors were from a politically
influential Cherokee family and part of
a political network that advanced
interests within the Cherokee Nation
when it was in Georgia. After the
Removal, the petitioner’s ancestors—the
Davis family in Georgia—did not
establish an autonomous political
organization composed of Cherokee who
remained in Georgia, nor did they
continue to participate in Cherokee
political activities in Indian Territory.
The petitioner submitted evidence
dating between the 1880s and 1925
about the neighborhood church and
school, but these institutions were not
Indian institutions. Rather, they served
Davis descendants and non-Indians, and
do not provide evidence of political
influence or authority within the
petitioner. Although the petitioner
named specific individuals as leaders
between 1870 and 1950, it did not
support these claims with
documentation showing political
processes within an Indian group.
Between 1838 and 1976—138 years—
the petitioner has not provided any
evidence that the petitioner’s ancestors
maintained formal or informal political
relationships that advanced issues of
interest to a distinct group of Cherokee
descendants. From 1976 to the present,
the petitioner submitted almost no
evidence showing how the petitioner
organized activities, dealt with conflict
and threats to Indian descendants, or
represented the interests of its members
other than by seeking acknowledgment
and protecting GTEC’s name in court.
Therefore, the petitioner does not meet
criterion 83.7(c).
Criterion (d) requires a copy of the
group’s present governing document,
including its membership criteria. The
petitioner provided two versions of its
2002 constitution and bylaws, which
describe how the group determines its
membership and how it governs itself.
The GTEC petitioner provided evidence
that satisfies the requirements of
criterion 83.7(d).
Criterion (e) requires that the
petitioner’s membership consist of
individuals who descend from a
historical Indian tribe or from historical
Indian tribes, which combined and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 May 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
functioned as a single autonomous
political entity. The current
membership list, dated August 10, 2013,
which the governing body separately
certified, has the required elements. The
petitioner has demonstrated that about
90 percent of its members (413 of 458)
descend from the historical Cherokee
Nation as it existed before the 1838
Removal. Therefore, the GTEC
petitioner satisfies the requirements of
criterion 83.7(e).
Criterion (f) requires that the
membership of the petitioner be
composed principally of persons who
are not members of any acknowledged
North American Indian tribe. The OFA
found no members of GTEC enrolled
with the Eastern Band of Cherokee
Indians, a federally recognized Indian
tribe. The OFA found that 13 members
of GTEC are enrolled with the Cherokee
Nation, a federally recognized Indian
tribe. The membership of the GTEC
petitioner is composed principally of
persons who are not members of any
North American Indian tribe. Thus, the
GTEC petitioner satisfies the
requirements of criterion 83.7(f).
Criterion (g) requires that neither the
petitioner nor its members are the
subject of congressional legislation that
has expressly terminated or forbidden
the Federal relationship. No evidence
has been found to indicate that the
petitioner was subject of congressional
legislation to terminate or prohibit a
Federal relationship as an Indian tribe.
Therefore, the petitioner meets the
requirements of criterion 83.7(g).
Based on this preliminary factual
determination, the Department proposes
to decline to acknowledge the GTEC
petitioner as an Indian tribe within the
meaning of Federal law.
A report summarizing the evidence,
reasoning, and analyses for the PF will
be provided to the petitioner and
interested parties. The PF is available to
other parties upon written request as
provided by 25 CFR 83.10(h) or
available on the Department of the
Interior’s Web site at https://
www.doi.gov. Requests for a copy of the
summary evaluation of the evidence
should be addressed to the Federal
Government as instructed in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice.
Publication of this notice of the PF in
the Federal Register initiates a 180-day
comment period during which the
petitioner and interested and informed
parties may submit arguments and
evidence to support or rebut the
evidence relied upon in the PF.
Comments on the PF should be
addressed to both the petitioner and the
Federal Government as required by 25
CFR 83.10(i) and as instructed in the
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ADDRESSES section of this notice by the
date listed in the DATES section of this
notice.
The regulations, 25 CFR 83.10(k),
provide the petitioner a minimum of 60
days to respond to any submissions on
the PF received from interested and
informed parties during the comment
period. After the expiration of the
comment and response periods
described above, the Department will
consult with the petitioner concerning
establishment of a schedule for
preparation of the FD. The AS–IA will
publish the FD of the petitioner’s status
in the Federal Register as provided in
25 CFR 83.10(l), at a time that is
consistent with that schedule.
Dated: May 6, 2016.
Lawrence S. Roberts,
Acting Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2016–11301 Filed 5–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWY920000.51010000.ER0000.
LVRWK09K1000; WYW174597; COC72909;
UTU87237]
Notice of Availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Energy Gateway South
Transmission Project and Proposed
Land-Use Plan Amendments
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and
the United States Forest Service (Forest
Service) announce the availability of the
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the Energy Gateway South
Transmission Project (Project) and
proposed land-use plan amendments
(LUPAs). The Final EIS analyzes the
potential environmental consequences
of granting a right-of-way (ROW) to
PacifiCorp (doing business as Rocky
Mountain Power) to construct and
operate an extra-high voltage (EHV)
alternating-current (AC) transmission
system.
SUMMARY:
BLM planning regulations (43
CFR 1610.5–2) state that any person
who meets the conditions as described
in the regulations may protest the BLM’s
Final EIS/Proposed LUPAs. A person
who meets the conditions and files a
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2016 / Notices
protest must file the protest within 30
days of the date that the Environmental
Protection Agency publishes its Notice
of Availability in the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Final EIS and
proposed LUPAs have been sent to
Federal, State, and local governments;
public libraries in the area potentially
affected by the proposed Project; and to
interested parties that previously
requested a copy. The Final EIS/
Proposed LUPAs and supporting
documents will be available
electronically on the following BLM
Web site: https://www.blm.gov/wy/st/en/
info/NEPA/documents/hdd/gateway_
south.html. Copies of the Final EIS and
Proposed LUPAs are available for public
inspection at the locations identified in
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this notice. Protests on the BLM landuse planning process must be submitted
in writing and mailed by July 12, 2016.
To submit a protest via regular mail,
send to BLM Director (210), Attention:
Protest Coordinator, P.O. Box 71383,
Washington, DC 20004–1383. Protests
submitted via overnight mail should be
sent to BLM Director (210), Attention:
Protest Coordinator, 20 M Street SE.,
Room 2134LM, Washington, DC 20003.
The BLM will issue its ROD after any
protests are resolved but no earlier than
30 days after the Final EIS is available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tamara Gertsch, Project Manager,
Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming
State Office, P.O. Box 21150, Cheyenne,
WY 82003; by telephone at (307) 775–
6115; or email to GatewaySouth_
WYMail@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
may call the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at (800) 877–8339 to
contact the above individual during
normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
For information about the Forest
Service’s involvement, contact Kenton
Call, Forest Service Project Lead by
telephone at (435) 691–0768; or email to
ckcall@fs.fed.us. The Forest Service will
provide information about its draft
decisions, and details about the predecisional objection process associated
with the Forest Service’s Draft ROD in
its Gateway South Project Final EIS
NOA to be published in the Federal
Register at a later date.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PacifiCorp
(doing business as Rocky Mountain
Power) filed a ROW application with
the BLM to construct and operate a
500kilovolt (kV), overhead, singlecircuit, alternating-current, transmission
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 May 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
line beginning near Medicine Bow,
Carbon County, Wyoming, at the Aeolus
Substation, and extending south and
west to the planned Clover Substation
near Mona, Juab County, Utah, an
approximate distance of between 400
and 540 miles (depending on the route
selected). The proposed Project also
would include rebuilding two existing
345kV transmission lines between the
Clover and Mona Substations (in the
existing right-of-way approximately 2miles in length), rerouting the Mona to
Huntington 345kV transmission line
through the Clover Substation,
constructing communication
regeneration stations, two series
compensation stations at points between
Aeolus and Clover substations to
improve transport capacity and
efficiency of the transmission line and,
depending on the route selected,
relocating approximately 2 miles of the
existing Bears Ears to Bonanza 345kV
transmission line to parallel the
proposed line, off the Raven Ridge Area
of Critical Environmental Concern
(ACEC), thereby eliminating multiple
crossings of transmission lines within a
short distance. Equipment to
accommodate the 500kV transmission
line would be installed at the Aeolus
and Clover substations. The requested
ROW width would be 250 feet for the
500kV portion of the proposed Project
and 150 feet for the 345kV portion of the
proposed Project. If the Project is
approved, construction is projected to
start in 2018.
The proposed Project is designed to
provide up to 1,500 megawatts of
capacity to meet current and forecasted
needs of Rocky Mountain Power’s
customers. The transmission line would
transmit power from both renewable
and thermal energy sources. Alternative
routes considered in the Final EIS cross
Federal, State, tribal, and private lands.
Under Federal law, the BLM is
responsible for responding to
applications for ROW on BLMadministered lands. Similarly, under
Federal law, the Forest Service is
responsible for responding to
applications for special-use
authorizations on lands administered by
the Forest Service. The BLM is the
designated lead Federal agency for
preparing the EIS as defined at 40 Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part
1501.5. The Forest Service is a
cooperating agency in the proposed
Project based on its potential Federal
action to issue a special use permit
across Forest Service lands. Additional
cooperating agencies include Federal,
State, tribal and local agencies.
In accordance with NEPA, the BLM
prepared a Draft EIS in response to the
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29913
ROW application for the proposed
Project using an interdisciplinary
approach in order to consider a variety
of resource issues and concerns
identified during internal, interagency
and public scoping. An NOA for the
Draft EIS for the Project was published
by the EPA for the Forest Service in the
Federal Register on February 21, 2014
(79 FR 9898), initiating a 90-day public
comment period. The BLM also
published an NOA for the Draft EIS on
the same date (79 FR 9916). To allow
the public an opportunity to review
information associated with the
proposed Project and comment on the
Draft EIS, the BLM conducted 12 openhouse meetings in March and April
2014 in Grand Junction, Rangely, and
Craig, Colorado; Baggs and Rawlins,
Wyoming; and Vernal, Fort Duchesne,
Roosevelt, Green River, Price, Mount
Pleasant, and Nephi, Utah. During the
comment period, the BLM received 603
submittals from Federal, State, and local
agencies; public and private
organizations; and individuals, of which
301 were one version of a form letter
and 126 were a form postcard. Principal
issues identified in the comments
received by BLM included:
• Mitigation;
• Opposition to, or support for,
specific route alignments; and
• Impacts on sensitive biological
resources, including sage-grouse and
special status plant species.
Comments received on the Draft EIS
were incorporated, where appropriate,
to clarify the analysis presented and are
included in the Final EIS. Based on
comments received on the Draft EIS,
revisions were made to the alignment of
the Agency Preferred Alternative,
including reduced separation distance
from existing transmission to reflect
updated Western Electricity
Coordinating Council guidance. In
addition, the BLM developed a series of
route variations to compare local
routing options for segments of the
Agency Preferred Alternative route.
The Final EIS considers 12 alternative
routes totaling 1,425 miles in detail and
a No Action Alternative. Also, a series
of route variations to compare local
routing options for segments of the
Agency Preferred Alternative route were
analyzed. Under the No Action
Alternative, the BLM ROW and the
Forest Service special-use authorization
for the proposed Project to cross Federal
lands would not be granted and the
transmission line and ancillary facilities
would not be constructed.
Approximately 51 miles (12 percent)
of the Agency Preferred Alternative
route is located within designated
utility corridors. The Agency Preferred
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
29914
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2016 / Notices
Alternative route is co-located with
existing transmission lines for a
distance of 116 miles (28 percent) of the
total length of 416 miles. The Agency
Preferred Alternative route crosses 231
miles of Federal; 1.6 miles of tribal; 48
miles of State; and 135 miles of private
land.
In Wyoming, the Agency Preferred
Alternative route exits the Aeolus
Substation in the utility corridor
designated by Wyoming Executive
Order 2011–5 for the protection of sagegrouse, continuing to the southwest
where it crosses Interstate 80
approximately 10 miles east of Sinclair,
Wyoming. The Agency Preferred
Alternative route continues west on the
southern side of Interstate 80
(approximately 3 to 5 miles south) for
approximately 57 miles. The Agency
Preferred Alternative route then
parallels Wamsutter Road (on the east
side of the road) south for
approximately 15 miles. At that point,
the Agency Preferred Alternative route
continues southwest crossing Flat Top
Mountain and continues toward the
Wyoming and Colorado border,
approximately 22 miles west of Baggs,
Wyoming.
The Agency Preferred Alternative
route continues south/southwest into
Colorado and through the Sevenmile
Ridge area, where it crosses the Little
Snake River, the western edge of the
Godiva Rim, and Colorado State
Highway 318 in an area approximately
10 miles northwest of Maybell,
Colorado. The Agency Preferred
Alternative route continues south
crossing the Yampa River 5 miles
northeast of Cross Mountain Gorge to a
point near U.S. Highway 40
approximately 12 miles southwest of
Maybell. At that point, the Agency
Preferred Alternative parallels U.S.
Highway 40 for approximately 3 miles
before continuing west to avoid crossing
the Tuttle Ranch Conservation Easement
and to minimize crossing of the Cross
Mountain Ranch Conservation
Easement. The route crosses the
Deerlodge Road entrance to the
Dinosaur National Monument on a State
of Colorado parcel before continuing
roughly south to parallel the Bonanza to
Bears Ears 345kV and the Hayden to
Artesia 138kV transmission lines south
of U.S. Highway 40. The route
terminates at a point approximately 22
miles east of Dinosaur, Colorado, and
crosses 1.8 miles of the Cross Mountain
Ranch Conservation Easement. From
this point, the Agency Preferred
Alternative route continues to parallel
the Bears Ears to Bonanza 345kV and
the Hayden to Artesia 138kV
transmission lines to the west toward
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 May 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
the Colorado/Utah border. The Agency
Preferred Alternative route continues to
follow the Bears Ears to Bonanza 345kV
transmission line southwest toward the
Bonanza Power Plant. The Agency
Preferred Alternative route then
continues west/southwest following an
underground pipeline through an area
where the Uinta Basin hookless cactus
and clay reed-mustard occurs (Federally
listed plant species) and crossing the
Green River approximately 8 miles
north of Sand Wash boat launch,
continuing west toward the western end
of the Tavaputs Plateau. In the plateau,
the Agency Preferred Alternative route
traverses through Argyle Ridge for
approximately 12 miles dropping
southwest toward U.S. Highway 191,
following the highway through Indian
Canyon for approximately 2 miles; it
then crosses the highway heading west/
northwest into the Emma Park area
(approximately 11 miles north of
Helper, Utah) toward Soldier Summit
for a distance of approximately 21 miles
avoiding sage-grouse leks/habitat to the
south and the Reservation Ridge Scenic
Backway (designated by the Forest
Service) to the north. The Agency
Preferred Alternative route continues
west toward U.S. Highway 6 and
parallels the Spanish Fork to Carbon
138kV transmission line northwest for
approximately 25 miles. The Agency
Preferred Alternative route continues
paralleling the Bonanza to Mona 345kV
transmission line toward Thistle, Utah,
turning south and crosses U.S. Highway
89 near Birdseye, Utah, continuing
south/southwest to a point
approximately 5 miles north of Fountain
Green, Utah. The Agency Preferred
Alternative route continues to parallel
the Bonanza to Mona 345kV
transmission line west through Salt
Creek Canyon, south of Mount Nebo,
toward Nephi, Utah, and the Clover
Substation.
The Agency Preferred Alternative
route was identified by the BLM in
coordination with the Forest Service
and other cooperating agencies using
criteria based key resource concerns and
issues, regulation and policy, and
Council of Environmental Quality
regulations for determining significance.
The criteria used include the following:
• Maximizes use of existing
designated utility corridors by locating
within the corridors or paralleling
existing linear utility ROWs.
• Avoids or minimizes impacts on
resources that are regulated by law, after
consideration of proposed Project
design features and agency best
management practices. This includes
impacts on greater sage-grouse.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Avoids potential impacts and
minimizes unavoidable impacts on
resources that may not be regulated by
law.
• Reduces the need for plan
amendments through conformance to
land-use plans.
• Avoids or minimizes proximity to
private residences and residential areas,
thereby addressing concerns with public
health and safety, aesthetics, property
values, visual effects, and other
concerns.
• Minimizes use of private lands,
assuming natural resource impacts are
more or less similar.
Copies of the Final EIS are available
for public review during normal
business hours at the following
locations:
• BLM, Wyoming State Office, Public
Reading Room, 5353 Yellowstone Road,
Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009;
• BLM, Rawlins Field Office, 1300
North Third Street, Rawlins, Wyoming
82301;
• BLM Colorado State Office, Public
Reading Room, 2850 Youngfield Street,
Lakewood, Colorado 80215–7093;
• BLM, Grand Junction Field Office,
2815 H Road, Grand Junction, Colorado
81506;
• BLM, Little Snake Field Office, 455
Emerson Street, Craig, Colorado 81625;
• BLM, White River Field Office, 220
East Market Street, Meeker, Colorado
81641;
• BLM Utah State Office, Public
Reading Room, 440 West 200 South,
Suite 500, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101–
1345;
• BLM, Fillmore Field Office, 35 East
500 North, Fillmore, Utah 84631;
• BLM, Moab Field Office, 82 East
Dogwood, Moab, Utah 84532;
• BLM, Price Field Office, 125 South
600 West, Price, Utah 84501;
• BLM, Salt Lake Field Office, 2370
South Decker Lake Boulevard, West
Valley City, Utah 84119;
• BLM, Richfield Field Office, 150
East 900 North, Richfield, Utah 84701;
• BLM, Vernal Field Office,170 South
500 East, Vernal, Utah 84078; and
• Forest Service (Lead Forest Office),
Ashley National Forest Supervisor’s
Office, 355 North Vernal Avenue,
Vernal, Utah 84078.
Agency Decisions on the Proposed
Project: Based on the environmental
analysis in the Final EIS, the BLM
Wyoming State Director will render a
decision for the portion of the project
which affect public land. The Forest
Service will issue a separate decision
specific to National Forest System land.
As the lead agency, the BLM has
coordinated and utilized the NEPA
comment process to satisfy the public
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2016 / Notices
involvement for Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (16
U.S.C. 470f), as provided for in 36 CFR
800.2(d)(3). Ongoing consultation with
American Indian tribes will continue in
accordance with policy. Tribal
concerns, including impacts on Indian
trust assets, will be given due
consideration. Federal, State, and local
agencies, as well as other stakeholders
interested or affected by the decisions
on this proposed Project, are invited to
respond to this notice.
BLM Land-use Plan Amendments and
the Protest Process: Depending on the
route alternative, potential LUPAs
proposed by the BLM are needed for the
portions of the proposed Project
crossing public land that do not
conform to the respective land use plan.
These include the following:
• Converting utility corridors from
underground use only to allow
aboveground utilities;
• Modifying BLM visual resource
management classifications; and
• Widening portions of a utility
corridor designated in a land-use plan to
include the Project ROW.
The BLM is proposing seven LUPAs
where the Agency Preferred Alternative
route is not in conformance with the
existing land-use plans.
All proposed LUPAs would comply
with applicable Federal laws and
regulations and can apply only to
Federal lands and mineral estate
administered by the BLM.
• Rawlins Resource Management Plan
(RMP): One amendment for visual
resource management
• Little Snake RMP: One amendment
for visual resource management
• Pony Express RMP (Salt Lake Field
Office): One amendment to establish a
new utility corridor
• Price RMP: One amendment to widen
a portion of an existing utility corridor
• Vernal RMP: Three amendments for
visual resource management
Instructions for filing a protest with
the BLM Director regarding the
proposed land-use plan amendments
may be found in the ‘‘Dear Reader’’
letter of the Final EIS and at 43 CFR
1610.5–2. All protests must be in
writing and mailed to the appropriate
address, as set forth in the ADDRESSES
section above. Emailed protests will not
be accepted as valid protests unless the
protesting party also provides the
original letter by either regular mail or
overnight delivery postmarked by the
close of the protest period. Under these
conditions, the BLM will consider the
email as an advance copy and it will
receive full consideration. If you wish to
provide the BLM with such advance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:05 May 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
notification, please direct emails to
protest@blm.gov.
Before including your phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your protest,
you should be aware that your entire
protest—including personal identifying
information—may be made publicly
available at any time. While you may
ask the BLM in your protest to withhold
your personal identifying information
from public review, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10,
43 CFR 1610.2.
Larry Claypool,
Acting Wyoming State Director.
[FR Doc. 2016–11371 Filed 5–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLNVW0000.L5110000.GN0000.
LVEMF1402860.14X; MO# 4500089716]
Notice of Availability of the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed Coeur Rochester Mine
Plan of Operations Amendment 10 and
Closure Plan, Pershing County, NV
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a
Final Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) for the Coeur Rochester Mine Plan
of Operations Amendment 10 and
Closure Plan and by this notice is
announcing its availability.
DATES: The BLM will not issue a final
decision on the proposal for a minimum
of 30 days after the date that the
Environmental Protection Agency
publishes its Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Coeur
Rochester Mine Plan of Operations
Amendment 10 and Closure Plan EIS
are available for public inspection at the
Winnemucca District BLM, 5100 E.
Winnemucca Blvd., Winnemucca, NV.
Interested persons may also review the
Final EIS on the Internet at https://
on.doi.gov/1d5pIxR.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Rehberg, Project Lead,
telephone 775–623–1500; address BLM
Winnemucca District, Humboldt River
Field Office, 5100 E. Winnemucca
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29915
Blvd., Winnemucca, NV 89445; email
krehberg@blm.gov. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
to contact the above individual during
normal business hours. The FIRS is
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
to leave a message or question with the
above individual. You will receive a
reply during normal business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
applicant, Coeur Rochester, Inc. (CRI),
has requested an expansion of its
operations at the existing Coeur
Rochester Mine, which is located
approximately 18 miles northeast of
Lovelock, Nevada, in the Humboldt
Range, Pershing County. The mine is
currently authorized to disturb up to
1,939 acres (approximately 187 acres of
private land and 1,752 acres of public
land), which was permitted under a
series of Environmental Assessments
(EA N26–86–002P, February 1986; EA
NV–020–99–12, February 1999; EA NV–
020–01–06, December 2000; EA NV–
020–01–06, February 2002; EA NV–020–
03–13, August 2003; DOI–BLM–NV–
W010–2010–0010–EA, October 2010).
The Draft EIS analyzed the potential
environmental impacts associated with
the proposed changes to CRI’s current
operations presented under this Plan of
Operations (Plan) modification, which
includes a total of 254.5 acres of new
disturbance proposed on public land,
and a reduction of approved disturbance
acres of 23.3 acres on private land.
The Draft EIS analyzed three
alternatives: (1) The Proposed Action;
(2) Permanent Management of
Potentially Acid Generating (PAG)
Material Outside of the Rochester Pit
Alternative; and (3) The No Action
Alternative. The Proposed Action would
include a change to the Plan boundary
designed to include existing claims and
newly acquired private lands within the
boundary. However, all of the proposed
disturbance to public land would be
within the existing approved Plan
boundary. The project includes the
following:
• An approximately 67-acre
expansion to the existing Stage IV Heap
Leach Pad (HLP);
• An increase of the allowable
maximum Stage IV HLP stacking height
from 330 feet to 400 feet;
• Construction of a 124-acre Stage V
HLP with associated ponds and tank;
• Relocation of a portion of the
American Canyon public access road
and establishment of an associated
right-of-way (ROW);
• Relocation of a portion of the paved
Rochester main access road ROW;
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29912-29915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11371]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLWY920000.51010000.ER0000.LVRWK09K1000; WYW174597; COC72909;
UTU87237]
Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the Energy Gateway South Transmission Project and
Proposed Land-Use Plan Amendments
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and
the United States Forest Service (Forest Service) announce the
availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the
Energy Gateway South Transmission Project (Project) and proposed land-
use plan amendments (LUPAs). The Final EIS analyzes the potential
environmental consequences of granting a right-of-way (ROW) to
PacifiCorp (doing business as Rocky Mountain Power) to construct and
operate an extra-high voltage (EHV) alternating-current (AC)
transmission system.
DATES: BLM planning regulations (43 CFR 1610.5-2) state that any person
who meets the conditions as described in the regulations may protest
the BLM's Final EIS/Proposed LUPAs. A person who meets the conditions
and files a
[[Page 29913]]
protest must file the protest within 30 days of the date that the
Environmental Protection Agency publishes its Notice of Availability in
the Federal Register.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the Final EIS and proposed LUPAs have been sent to
Federal, State, and local governments; public libraries in the area
potentially affected by the proposed Project; and to interested parties
that previously requested a copy. The Final EIS/Proposed LUPAs and
supporting documents will be available electronically on the following
BLM Web site: https://www.blm.gov/wy/st/en/info/NEPA/documents/hdd/gateway_south.html. Copies of the Final EIS and Proposed LUPAs are
available for public inspection at the locations identified in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice. Protests on the BLM
land-use planning process must be submitted in writing and mailed by
July 12, 2016. To submit a protest via regular mail, send to BLM
Director (210), Attention: Protest Coordinator, P.O. Box 71383,
Washington, DC 20004-1383. Protests submitted via overnight mail should
be sent to BLM Director (210), Attention: Protest Coordinator, 20 M
Street SE., Room 2134LM, Washington, DC 20003. The BLM will issue its
ROD after any protests are resolved but no earlier than 30 days after
the Final EIS is available.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamara Gertsch, Project Manager,
Bureau of Land Management, Wyoming State Office, P.O. Box 21150,
Cheyenne, WY 82003; by telephone at (307) 775-6115; or email to
GatewaySouth_WYMail@blm.gov. Persons who use a telecommunications
device for the deaf may call the Federal Information Relay Service
(FIRS) at (800) 877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal
business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to
leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive
a reply during normal business hours.
For information about the Forest Service's involvement, contact
Kenton Call, Forest Service Project Lead by telephone at (435) 691-
0768; or email to ckcall@fs.fed.us. The Forest Service will provide
information about its draft decisions, and details about the pre-
decisional objection process associated with the Forest Service's Draft
ROD in its Gateway South Project Final EIS NOA to be published in the
Federal Register at a later date.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PacifiCorp (doing business as Rocky Mountain
Power) filed a ROW application with the BLM to construct and operate a
500kilovolt (kV), overhead, single-circuit, alternating-current,
transmission line beginning near Medicine Bow, Carbon County, Wyoming,
at the Aeolus Substation, and extending south and west to the planned
Clover Substation near Mona, Juab County, Utah, an approximate distance
of between 400 and 540 miles (depending on the route selected). The
proposed Project also would include rebuilding two existing 345kV
transmission lines between the Clover and Mona Substations (in the
existing right-of-way approximately 2-miles in length), rerouting the
Mona to Huntington 345kV transmission line through the Clover
Substation, constructing communication regeneration stations, two
series compensation stations at points between Aeolus and Clover
substations to improve transport capacity and efficiency of the
transmission line and, depending on the route selected, relocating
approximately 2 miles of the existing Bears Ears to Bonanza 345kV
transmission line to parallel the proposed line, off the Raven Ridge
Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC), thereby eliminating
multiple crossings of transmission lines within a short distance.
Equipment to accommodate the 500kV transmission line would be installed
at the Aeolus and Clover substations. The requested ROW width would be
250 feet for the 500kV portion of the proposed Project and 150 feet for
the 345kV portion of the proposed Project. If the Project is approved,
construction is projected to start in 2018.
The proposed Project is designed to provide up to 1,500 megawatts
of capacity to meet current and forecasted needs of Rocky Mountain
Power's customers. The transmission line would transmit power from both
renewable and thermal energy sources. Alternative routes considered in
the Final EIS cross Federal, State, tribal, and private lands. Under
Federal law, the BLM is responsible for responding to applications for
ROW on BLM-administered lands. Similarly, under Federal law, the Forest
Service is responsible for responding to applications for special-use
authorizations on lands administered by the Forest Service. The BLM is
the designated lead Federal agency for preparing the EIS as defined at
40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 1501.5. The Forest Service is
a cooperating agency in the proposed Project based on its potential
Federal action to issue a special use permit across Forest Service
lands. Additional cooperating agencies include Federal, State, tribal
and local agencies.
In accordance with NEPA, the BLM prepared a Draft EIS in response
to the ROW application for the proposed Project using an
interdisciplinary approach in order to consider a variety of resource
issues and concerns identified during internal, interagency and public
scoping. An NOA for the Draft EIS for the Project was published by the
EPA for the Forest Service in the Federal Register on February 21, 2014
(79 FR 9898), initiating a 90-day public comment period. The BLM also
published an NOA for the Draft EIS on the same date (79 FR 9916). To
allow the public an opportunity to review information associated with
the proposed Project and comment on the Draft EIS, the BLM conducted 12
open-house meetings in March and April 2014 in Grand Junction, Rangely,
and Craig, Colorado; Baggs and Rawlins, Wyoming; and Vernal, Fort
Duchesne, Roosevelt, Green River, Price, Mount Pleasant, and Nephi,
Utah. During the comment period, the BLM received 603 submittals from
Federal, State, and local agencies; public and private organizations;
and individuals, of which 301 were one version of a form letter and 126
were a form postcard. Principal issues identified in the comments
received by BLM included:
Mitigation;
Opposition to, or support for, specific route alignments;
and
Impacts on sensitive biological resources, including sage-
grouse and special status plant species.
Comments received on the Draft EIS were incorporated, where
appropriate, to clarify the analysis presented and are included in the
Final EIS. Based on comments received on the Draft EIS, revisions were
made to the alignment of the Agency Preferred Alternative, including
reduced separation distance from existing transmission to reflect
updated Western Electricity Coordinating Council guidance. In addition,
the BLM developed a series of route variations to compare local routing
options for segments of the Agency Preferred Alternative route.
The Final EIS considers 12 alternative routes totaling 1,425 miles
in detail and a No Action Alternative. Also, a series of route
variations to compare local routing options for segments of the Agency
Preferred Alternative route were analyzed. Under the No Action
Alternative, the BLM ROW and the Forest Service special-use
authorization for the proposed Project to cross Federal lands would not
be granted and the transmission line and ancillary facilities would not
be constructed.
Approximately 51 miles (12 percent) of the Agency Preferred
Alternative route is located within designated utility corridors. The
Agency Preferred
[[Page 29914]]
Alternative route is co-located with existing transmission lines for a
distance of 116 miles (28 percent) of the total length of 416 miles.
The Agency Preferred Alternative route crosses 231 miles of Federal;
1.6 miles of tribal; 48 miles of State; and 135 miles of private land.
In Wyoming, the Agency Preferred Alternative route exits the Aeolus
Substation in the utility corridor designated by Wyoming Executive
Order 2011-5 for the protection of sage-grouse, continuing to the
southwest where it crosses Interstate 80 approximately 10 miles east of
Sinclair, Wyoming. The Agency Preferred Alternative route continues
west on the southern side of Interstate 80 (approximately 3 to 5 miles
south) for approximately 57 miles. The Agency Preferred Alternative
route then parallels Wamsutter Road (on the east side of the road)
south for approximately 15 miles. At that point, the Agency Preferred
Alternative route continues southwest crossing Flat Top Mountain and
continues toward the Wyoming and Colorado border, approximately 22
miles west of Baggs, Wyoming.
The Agency Preferred Alternative route continues south/southwest
into Colorado and through the Sevenmile Ridge area, where it crosses
the Little Snake River, the western edge of the Godiva Rim, and
Colorado State Highway 318 in an area approximately 10 miles northwest
of Maybell, Colorado. The Agency Preferred Alternative route continues
south crossing the Yampa River 5 miles northeast of Cross Mountain
Gorge to a point near U.S. Highway 40 approximately 12 miles southwest
of Maybell. At that point, the Agency Preferred Alternative parallels
U.S. Highway 40 for approximately 3 miles before continuing west to
avoid crossing the Tuttle Ranch Conservation Easement and to minimize
crossing of the Cross Mountain Ranch Conservation Easement. The route
crosses the Deerlodge Road entrance to the Dinosaur National Monument
on a State of Colorado parcel before continuing roughly south to
parallel the Bonanza to Bears Ears 345kV and the Hayden to Artesia
138kV transmission lines south of U.S. Highway 40. The route terminates
at a point approximately 22 miles east of Dinosaur, Colorado, and
crosses 1.8 miles of the Cross Mountain Ranch Conservation Easement.
From this point, the Agency Preferred Alternative route continues to
parallel the Bears Ears to Bonanza 345kV and the Hayden to Artesia
138kV transmission lines to the west toward the Colorado/Utah border.
The Agency Preferred Alternative route continues to follow the Bears
Ears to Bonanza 345kV transmission line southwest toward the Bonanza
Power Plant. The Agency Preferred Alternative route then continues
west/southwest following an underground pipeline through an area where
the Uinta Basin hookless cactus and clay reed-mustard occurs (Federally
listed plant species) and crossing the Green River approximately 8
miles north of Sand Wash boat launch, continuing west toward the
western end of the Tavaputs Plateau. In the plateau, the Agency
Preferred Alternative route traverses through Argyle Ridge for
approximately 12 miles dropping southwest toward U.S. Highway 191,
following the highway through Indian Canyon for approximately 2 miles;
it then crosses the highway heading west/northwest into the Emma Park
area (approximately 11 miles north of Helper, Utah) toward Soldier
Summit for a distance of approximately 21 miles avoiding sage-grouse
leks/habitat to the south and the Reservation Ridge Scenic Backway
(designated by the Forest Service) to the north. The Agency Preferred
Alternative route continues west toward U.S. Highway 6 and parallels
the Spanish Fork to Carbon 138kV transmission line northwest for
approximately 25 miles. The Agency Preferred Alternative route
continues paralleling the Bonanza to Mona 345kV transmission line
toward Thistle, Utah, turning south and crosses U.S. Highway 89 near
Birdseye, Utah, continuing south/southwest to a point approximately 5
miles north of Fountain Green, Utah. The Agency Preferred Alternative
route continues to parallel the Bonanza to Mona 345kV transmission line
west through Salt Creek Canyon, south of Mount Nebo, toward Nephi,
Utah, and the Clover Substation.
The Agency Preferred Alternative route was identified by the BLM in
coordination with the Forest Service and other cooperating agencies
using criteria based key resource concerns and issues, regulation and
policy, and Council of Environmental Quality regulations for
determining significance. The criteria used include the following:
Maximizes use of existing designated utility corridors by
locating within the corridors or paralleling existing linear utility
ROWs.
Avoids or minimizes impacts on resources that are
regulated by law, after consideration of proposed Project design
features and agency best management practices. This includes impacts on
greater sage-grouse.
Avoids potential impacts and minimizes unavoidable impacts
on resources that may not be regulated by law.
Reduces the need for plan amendments through conformance
to land-use plans.
Avoids or minimizes proximity to private residences and
residential areas, thereby addressing concerns with public health and
safety, aesthetics, property values, visual effects, and other
concerns.
Minimizes use of private lands, assuming natural resource
impacts are more or less similar.
Copies of the Final EIS are available for public review during
normal business hours at the following locations:
BLM, Wyoming State Office, Public Reading Room, 5353
Yellowstone Road, Cheyenne, Wyoming 82009;
BLM, Rawlins Field Office, 1300 North Third Street,
Rawlins, Wyoming 82301;
BLM Colorado State Office, Public Reading Room, 2850
Youngfield Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80215-7093;
BLM, Grand Junction Field Office, 2815 H Road, Grand
Junction, Colorado 81506;
BLM, Little Snake Field Office, 455 Emerson Street, Craig,
Colorado 81625;
BLM, White River Field Office, 220 East Market Street,
Meeker, Colorado 81641;
BLM Utah State Office, Public Reading Room, 440 West 200
South, Suite 500, Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1345;
BLM, Fillmore Field Office, 35 East 500 North, Fillmore,
Utah 84631;
BLM, Moab Field Office, 82 East Dogwood, Moab, Utah 84532;
BLM, Price Field Office, 125 South 600 West, Price, Utah
84501;
BLM, Salt Lake Field Office, 2370 South Decker Lake
Boulevard, West Valley City, Utah 84119;
BLM, Richfield Field Office, 150 East 900 North,
Richfield, Utah 84701;
BLM, Vernal Field Office,170 South 500 East, Vernal, Utah
84078; and
Forest Service (Lead Forest Office), Ashley National
Forest Supervisor's Office, 355 North Vernal Avenue, Vernal, Utah
84078.
Agency Decisions on the Proposed Project: Based on the
environmental analysis in the Final EIS, the BLM Wyoming State Director
will render a decision for the portion of the project which affect
public land. The Forest Service will issue a separate decision specific
to National Forest System land.
As the lead agency, the BLM has coordinated and utilized the NEPA
comment process to satisfy the public
[[Page 29915]]
involvement for Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
(16 U.S.C. 470f), as provided for in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3). Ongoing
consultation with American Indian tribes will continue in accordance
with policy. Tribal concerns, including impacts on Indian trust assets,
will be given due consideration. Federal, State, and local agencies, as
well as other stakeholders interested or affected by the decisions on
this proposed Project, are invited to respond to this notice.
BLM Land-use Plan Amendments and the Protest Process: Depending on
the route alternative, potential LUPAs proposed by the BLM are needed
for the portions of the proposed Project crossing public land that do
not conform to the respective land use plan. These include the
following:
Converting utility corridors from underground use only to
allow aboveground utilities;
Modifying BLM visual resource management classifications;
and
Widening portions of a utility corridor designated in a
land-use plan to include the Project ROW.
The BLM is proposing seven LUPAs where the Agency Preferred
Alternative route is not in conformance with the existing land-use
plans.
All proposed LUPAs would comply with applicable Federal laws and
regulations and can apply only to Federal lands and mineral estate
administered by the BLM.
Rawlins Resource Management Plan (RMP): One amendment for
visual resource management
Little Snake RMP: One amendment for visual resource management
Pony Express RMP (Salt Lake Field Office): One amendment to
establish a new utility corridor
Price RMP: One amendment to widen a portion of an existing
utility corridor
Vernal RMP: Three amendments for visual resource management
Instructions for filing a protest with the BLM Director regarding
the proposed land-use plan amendments may be found in the ``Dear
Reader'' letter of the Final EIS and at 43 CFR 1610.5-2. All protests
must be in writing and mailed to the appropriate address, as set forth
in the ADDRESSES section above. Emailed protests will not be accepted
as valid protests unless the protesting party also provides the
original letter by either regular mail or overnight delivery postmarked
by the close of the protest period. Under these conditions, the BLM
will consider the email as an advance copy and it will receive full
consideration. If you wish to provide the BLM with such advance
notification, please direct emails to protest@blm.gov.
Before including your phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your protest, you should be aware
that your entire protest--including personal identifying information--
may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask the BLM
in your protest to withhold your personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2.
Larry Claypool,
Acting Wyoming State Director.
[FR Doc. 2016-11371 Filed 5-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-22-P