Safety Zone; Navy UNDET, Apra Outer Harbor and Piti, GU, 29772-29774 [2016-11361]
Download as PDF
29772
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction Manual
(CIM) M16475.lD, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f),
and have concluded that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a temporary security
zone and is categorically excluded from
further review under, paragraph 34(g) of
figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
20:04 May 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0250 to read as
follows:
■
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the temporary security
zone shall telephone the COTP at (203)
468–4401, or his designated
representative via VHF channel 16 to
obtain permission to do so.
Dated: April 19, 2016.
E.J. Cubanski, III,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Long Island Sound.
[FR Doc. 2016–11253 Filed 5–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
§ 165.T01–0250 Security Zone; Tall-Ship
CUAUHTEMOC; Thames River, New London
Harbor, New London, CT.
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0274]
(a) Location. The following areas are
designated as security zones:
(1) All navigable waters within the
Sector Long Island Sound Captain of the
Port (COTP) Zone, extending from the
surface to the bottom, within a 250-yard
radius of the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC.
(2) All navigable waters within the
Thames River in New London Harbor,
New London, CT, extending from the
surface to the riverbed within a 100yard radius of the Tall-Ship
CUAUHTEMOC while it moored or
anchored in the Thames River in New
London Harbor, New London, CT.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from May 1, 2016
through May 14, 2016, unless
terminated sooner by the COTP.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.33
apply. During the enforcement period,
entry into, transit through, remaining
within, mooring or anchoring within
this temporary security zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP) or the
designated representative.
(2) Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the temporary
security zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or
the designated representatives. Those
vessels may be required to be at anchor
or moored to a waterfront facility.
(3) The ‘‘designated representative’’ is
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP to act on his
behalf. The on-scene representative may
be on a Coast Guard vessel, or onboard
a federal, state, or local agency vessel
that is authorized to act in support of
the Coast Guard.
Safety Zone; Navy UNDET, Apra Outer
Harbor and Piti, GU
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 1625–AA00
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
underwater detonation operations in the
waters of Apra Outer Harbor and Piti,
Guam. The Coast Guard believes this
safety zone regulation is necessary to
protect all persons and vessels that
would otherwise transit or be within the
affected areas from possible safety
hazards associated with underwater
detonation operations. Entry of vessels
or persons into these zones is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port Guam.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from May 13, 2016 until
May 16, 2016. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used
from May 10, 2016, until May 13, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
0274 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Chief Kristina Gauthier, Sector
Guam, U.S. Coast Guard; (671) 355–
4866, Kristina.M.Gauthier@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
UNDET Underwater detonation
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable and contrary
to public interest. The Coast Guard
received notice of this operation on
March 10, 2015, only 62 days before the
operation is scheduled. As a result, the
Coast Guard did not have time to issue
a notice of proposed rulemaking. Thus,
delaying the effective date of this rule to
wait for a comment period to run would
be impracticable because it would
inhibit the Coast Guard’s ability to
protect vessels and waterway users from
the hazards associated with this
operation.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for making it
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Due
to the late notice and inherent danger in
underwater exercises, delaying the
effective period of this safety zone
would be contrary to the public interest.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
Captain of the Port Guam (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the U.S. Navy training
exercise, which include detonation of
underwater explosives on May 10th
through 13th and 16th, 2016, will be a
safety concern for anyone within a 700yard radius on the surface and 1400yard radius underwater of the operation.
This rule is needed to protect personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment in
the navigable waters within the safety
zone during the exercise. Mariners and
divers approaching too close to such
exercises could potentially expose the
mariner to flying debris or other
hazardous conditions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 May 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes safety zones
from 8 a.m. through 4 p.m. on May 10th
through 13th and 16th, 2016. The safety
zones will cover all navigable waters
within 700 yards on the surface and
1400 yards underwater of vessels and
machinery being used by Navy. The
duration of the zone is intended to
protect personnel, vessels, and the
marine environment in these navigable
waters during the underwater
detonation exercise. No vessel or person
will be permitted to enter the safety
zones without obtaining permission
from the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to
rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these
statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of
available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,
it has not been reviewed by the Office
of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the safety zone. Vessel
traffic will be able to safely transit
around this safety zone which will
impact a small designated area of in
waters off of Piti Guam, for 8 hours for
3 days and in Apra Outer Harbor for 8
hours for 3 days. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone and the rule allows
vessels to seek permission to enter the
zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29773
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has
a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the
fundamental federalism principles and
preemption requirements described in
E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
29774
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting 8 hours a day for 5 days
that will prohibit entry within 700 yards
on the surface and 1400 underwater of
vessels and machinery being used by
Navy personnel. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 May 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and record-keeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—SAFETY ZONE; NAVY
UNDET, APRA OUTER HARBOR AND
PITI, GU.
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
impractical for the purpose of maritime
security.
(f) Penalties. Vessels or persons
violating this rule are subject to the
penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and
50 U.S.C. 192.
Dated: April 28, 2016.
James C. Campbell,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port, Guam.
[FR Doc. 2016–11361 Filed 5–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191,
195; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and
160.5; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T14–0274 to read as
follows:
■
165. T14–0274 Safety Zone; Navy UNDET,
Apra Outer Harbor and Piti, GU.
(a) Location. The following areas,
within the Guam Captain of the Port
(COTP) Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70–15),
from the surface of the water to the
ocean floor, are safety zones:
(1) Piti Guam May 10th through 12th.
All surface waters bounded by a circle
with a 700-yard radius and all
underwater areas bounded by a circle
with a 1400 yard radius centered at 13
degrees 29 minutes 03 seconds North
Latitude and 144 degrees 40 minutes 03
seconds East Longitude, (NAD 1983).
(2) Apra Outer Harbor, Guam May
12th through 13th and 16th. All surface
waters bounded by a circle with a 700yard radius and all underwater areas
bounded by a circle with a 1400 yard
radius centered at 13 degrees 27
minutes 42 seconds North Latitude and
144 degrees 38 minutes 30 seconds East
Longitude, (NAD 1983).
(b) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8 a.m. through 4
p.m. on May 10th through 13th and
16th, 2016.
(c) Regulations. The general
regulations governing safety zones
contained in § 165.23 apply. No vessels
may enter or transit safety zones (a)(1)
and no persons in the water may enter
or transit safety zone (a)(2) unless
authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative thereof.
(d) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer,
and any other COTP representative
permitted by law, may enforce these
temporary safety zones.
(e) Waiver. The COTP may waive any
of the requirements of this section for
any person, vessel, or class of vessel
upon finding that application of the
safety zone is unnecessary or
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0265]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; National Grid—Beck
Lockport 104 & Beck Harper 106
Removal Project; Niagara River,
Lewiston, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Niagara River, Buffalo, NY. This
safety zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Niagara
River during the removal of
international power lines spanning the
Niagara River. This temporary safety
zone is necessary to protect mariners
and vessels from the navigational
hazards associated with the removal of
overhead power lines.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:45
a.m. on May 16, 2016, through 6:15 p.m.
on May 18, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
0265 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12–140
on the ground floor of the Department
of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LTJG Amanda Garcia, Chief of
Waterways Management, Sector Buffalo,
U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 716–843–
9343, email
SectorBuffaloMarineSafety@uscg.mil.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29772-29774]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11361]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0274]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Navy UNDET, Apra Outer Harbor and Piti, GU
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
underwater detonation operations in the waters of Apra Outer Harbor and
Piti, Guam. The Coast Guard believes this safety zone regulation is
necessary to protect all persons and vessels that would otherwise
transit or be within the affected areas from possible safety hazards
associated with underwater detonation operations. Entry of vessels or
persons into these zones is prohibited unless specifically authorized
by the Captain of the Port Guam.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from May 13, 2016
until May 16, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will
be used from May 10, 2016, until May 13, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0274 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Chief Kristina Gauthier, Sector Guam, U.S. Coast Guard;
(671) 355-4866, Kristina.M.Gauthier@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
[[Page 29773]]
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
Sec. Section
UNDET Underwater detonation
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and
contrary to public interest. The Coast Guard received notice of this
operation on March 10, 2015, only 62 days before the operation is
scheduled. As a result, the Coast Guard did not have time to issue a
notice of proposed rulemaking. Thus, delaying the effective date of
this rule to wait for a comment period to run would be impracticable
because it would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect vessels
and waterway users from the hazards associated with this operation.
We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. Due to the late notice
and inherent danger in underwater exercises, delaying the effective
period of this safety zone would be contrary to the public interest.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port Guam (COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the U.S. Navy training exercise, which include
detonation of underwater explosives on May 10th through 13th and 16th,
2016, will be a safety concern for anyone within a 700-yard radius on
the surface and 1400-yard radius underwater of the operation. This rule
is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in
the navigable waters within the safety zone during the exercise.
Mariners and divers approaching too close to such exercises could
potentially expose the mariner to flying debris or other hazardous
conditions.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes safety zones from 8 a.m. through 4 p.m. on
May 10th through 13th and 16th, 2016. The safety zones will cover all
navigable waters within 700 yards on the surface and 1400 yards
underwater of vessels and machinery being used by Navy. The duration of
the zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in these navigable waters during the underwater detonation
exercise. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety
zones without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, it has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be able
to safely transit around this safety zone which will impact a small
designated area of in waters off of Piti Guam, for 8 hours for 3 days
and in Apra Outer Harbor for 8 hours for 3 days. Moreover, the Coast
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel
16 about the zone and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to
enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated
in section A above, this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175,
Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the
[[Page 29774]]
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications
for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a safety zone lasting 8 hours a day for 5 days that will
prohibit entry within 700 yards on the surface and 1400 underwater of
vessels and machinery being used by Navy personnel. It is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the
Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting
this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record-
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--SAFETY ZONE; NAVY UNDET, APRA OUTER HARBOR AND PITI, GU.
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-
1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T14-0274 to read as follows:
165. T14-0274 Safety Zone; Navy UNDET, Apra Outer Harbor and Piti, GU.
(a) Location. The following areas, within the Guam Captain of the
Port (COTP) Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70-15), from the surface of the water to
the ocean floor, are safety zones:
(1) Piti Guam May 10th through 12th. All surface waters bounded by
a circle with a 700-yard radius and all underwater areas bounded by a
circle with a 1400 yard radius centered at 13 degrees 29 minutes 03
seconds North Latitude and 144 degrees 40 minutes 03 seconds East
Longitude, (NAD 1983).
(2) Apra Outer Harbor, Guam May 12th through 13th and 16th. All
surface waters bounded by a circle with a 700-yard radius and all
underwater areas bounded by a circle with a 1400 yard radius centered
at 13 degrees 27 minutes 42 seconds North Latitude and 144 degrees 38
minutes 30 seconds East Longitude, (NAD 1983).
(b) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8 a.m.
through 4 p.m. on May 10th through 13th and 16th, 2016.
(c) Regulations. The general regulations governing safety zones
contained in Sec. 165.23 apply. No vessels may enter or transit safety
zones (a)(1) and no persons in the water may enter or transit safety
zone (a)(2) unless authorized by the COTP or a designated
representative thereof.
(d) Enforcement. Any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer, and any other COTP representative permitted by law, may
enforce these temporary safety zones.
(e) Waiver. The COTP may waive any of the requirements of this
section for any person, vessel, or class of vessel upon finding that
application of the safety zone is unnecessary or impractical for the
purpose of maritime security.
(f) Penalties. Vessels or persons violating this rule are subject
to the penalties set forth in 33 U.S.C. 1232 and 50 U.S.C. 192.
Dated: April 28, 2016.
James C. Campbell,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Guam.
[FR Doc. 2016-11361 Filed 5-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P