Security Zone; Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC; Thames River, New London Harbor, New London, CT, 29770-29772 [2016-11253]
Download as PDF
29770
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
markers. The six anchorages are located
in the following areas: Branch Rd Point;
Emerald Ln Point; Lotell Hollow Cove;
McCoy Branch Cove; west of Duck Head
Point; and Jennings Branch Cove. In
addition to the listed designated
anchorages, vessels may also anchor
inside the protective coves.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Upper Mississippi River in the
enforcement of the regulation.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in § 100.35, deviation from
the regulations described in paragraph
(a) of this section is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP Upper
Mississippi River or designated
representative.
(2) To seek permission to deviate from
the regulation, contact the COTP or the
COTP’s designated representative via
VHF–FM ch 16 or by calling Sector
Upper Mississippi River at 314–269–
2332.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.
on June 4, 2016.
Dated: May 6, 2016.
M.L. Malloy,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Upper Mississippi River.
[FR Doc. 2016–11339 Filed 5–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0384]
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Grassy Sound Channel, Middle
Township, NJ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of deviation from
drawbridge regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the Grassy Sound
Channel Bridge (West Ocean Drive/
CR619) across the Grassy Sound
Channel, mile 1.0, at Middle Township,
NJ. This deviation is necessary to
provide for the safety of runners during
‘‘The Wild Half’’ annual half marathon.
This deviation allows the bridge to
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 May 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
remain in the closed-to-navigation
position.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
DATES:
This deviation is effective from
7:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. on May 15, 2016.
Coast Guard
The docket for this
deviation, [USCG–2016–0384] is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Type the docket number in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH’’.
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.
33 CFR Part 165
ADDRESSES:
If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email Mr. Hal R. Pitts,
Bridge Administration Branch Fifth
District, Coast Guard, telephone 757–
398–6222, email Hal.R.Pitts@uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The Cape
May County, Department of Public
Works, that owns and operates the
Grassy Sound Channel Bridge, has
requested a temporary deviation from
the current operating regulations to
provide for the safety of runners during
‘‘The Wild Half’’ annual half marathon
event. The bridge is a bascule draw
bridge and has a vertical clearance in
the closed position of 15 feet above
mean high water.
The current operating schedule is set
out in 33 CFR 117.721. Under this
temporary deviation, the bridge will
remain in the closed-to-navigation
position from 7:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. on
May 15, 2016. The Coast Guard has
carefully considered the nature and
volume of vessel traffic on the waterway
in publishing this temporary deviation.
Vessels able to safely pass through the
bridge in the closed position may do so
at any time. The bridge will be able to
open for emergencies and the New
Jersey Intracoastal Waterway is an
alternate route for vessels transiting the
area. The Coast Guard will also inform
the users of the waterways through our
Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners
of the change in operating schedule for
the bridge so that vessel operators can
arrange their transit to minimize any
impact caused by the temporary
deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the effective period of this
temporary deviation. This deviation
from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: May 10, 2016.
Hal R. Pitts,
Bridge Program Manager, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2016–11349 Filed 5–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0250]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Tall-Ship
CUAUHTEMOC; Thames River, New
London Harbor, New London, CT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
around the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC
during its transit through the Long
Island Sound Captain of the Port (COTP)
Zone, and for the duration of its
mooring on the Thames River in New
London Harbor, New London, CT. This
temporary final rule creates a 250-yard
radius security zone encompassing all
navigable waters around the Tall-Ship
CUAUHTEMOC while in transit through
Sector Long Island Sound’s Captain of
the Port (COTP) Zone, and a 100-yard
radius temporary security zone while
the vessel is anchored or moored in the
Thames River in New London Harbor,
New London, CT. This zone is needed
to protect the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC
and its crew from destruction, loss, or
injury from sabotage, subversive acts, or
other malicious acts of a similar nature.
Persons or vessels may not enter the
security zone without permission of the
COTP or a COTP designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective without
actual notice from May 13, 2016 until
May 14, 2016. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used
from May 1, 2016 until May 13, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
0250 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Jay TerVeen,
Prevention Department, Coast Guard
Sector Long Island Sound; telephone
(203) 468–4446, email Jay.C.TerVeen@
uscg.mil.
DATES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because an
NPRM would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest.
Consequently, the Coast Guard did not
have enough time to draft, publish, and
receive public comment on this
rulemaking via an NPRM and still
publish a final rule before the event was
scheduled to take place. Delaying this
rulemaking by waiting for a comment
period to run would also reduce the
Coast Guard’s ability to fulfill its
statutory missions to protect and secure
the ports and waterways of the United
States.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), and for the
same reasons as stated above, the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to public
interest because immediate action is
needed to respond to the potential
security threats associated with having
the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC in U.S.
Waters.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under the authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
The Captain of the Port Long of Island
Sound (COTP) has determined that
vessels, within a 250-yard radius of the
Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC while it is
transiting and a 100-yard radius while it
is moored, pose a potential security risk.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone
from May 1, 2016 through May 14, 2016
for the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC. This
zone is needed to protect the Tall-Ship
CUAUHTEMOC and its crew from
destruction, loss, or injury from
sabotage, subversive acts, or other
malicious acts of a similar nature.
This rule prevents vessels from
entering, transiting, mooring, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
14:42 May 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
anchoring within the security zone
unless authorized by the COTP or
designated representative. The Coast
Guard has determined that this security
zone will not have a significant impact
on vessel traffic due to its temporary
nature, limited size, and the fact that
vessels are allowed to transit the
navigable waters outside of the security
zone.
The Coast Guard will notify the
public and local mariners of this safety
zone through appropriate means, which
may include, but are not limited to,
publication in the Federal Register, the
Local Notice to Mariners, and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive
Order and we discuss First Amendment
rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Orders 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
The Coast Guard determined that this
rulemaking is not a significant
regulatory action for the following
reasons: (1) The enforcement of this
security zone will be relatively short in
duration; (2) persons or vessels desiring
to enter the security zone may do so
with permission from the COTP Sector
LIS or a designated representative; (3)
this security zone is designed in a way
to limit impacts on vessel traffic,
permitting vessels to navigate in other
portions of the waterway not designated
as a security zone; and (4) the Coast
Guard will notify the public of the
enforcement of this rule via appropriate
means, such as via Local Notice to
Mariners and Broadcast Notice to
Mariners to increase public awareness
of this security zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29771
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this proposed rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
29772
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 93 / Friday, May 13, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) Management Directive 023–01
and Commandant Instruction Manual
(CIM) M16475.lD, which guide the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f),
and have concluded that this action is
one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves the
establishment of a temporary security
zone and is categorically excluded from
further review under, paragraph 34(g) of
figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
20:04 May 12, 2016
Jkt 238001
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0250 to read as
follows:
■
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the temporary security
zone shall telephone the COTP at (203)
468–4401, or his designated
representative via VHF channel 16 to
obtain permission to do so.
Dated: April 19, 2016.
E.J. Cubanski, III,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Long Island Sound.
[FR Doc. 2016–11253 Filed 5–12–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
§ 165.T01–0250 Security Zone; Tall-Ship
CUAUHTEMOC; Thames River, New London
Harbor, New London, CT.
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0274]
(a) Location. The following areas are
designated as security zones:
(1) All navigable waters within the
Sector Long Island Sound Captain of the
Port (COTP) Zone, extending from the
surface to the bottom, within a 250-yard
radius of the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC.
(2) All navigable waters within the
Thames River in New London Harbor,
New London, CT, extending from the
surface to the riverbed within a 100yard radius of the Tall-Ship
CUAUHTEMOC while it moored or
anchored in the Thames River in New
London Harbor, New London, CT.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from May 1, 2016
through May 14, 2016, unless
terminated sooner by the COTP.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.33
apply. During the enforcement period,
entry into, transit through, remaining
within, mooring or anchoring within
this temporary security zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP) or the
designated representative.
(2) Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the temporary
security zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the COTP or
the designated representatives. Those
vessels may be required to be at anchor
or moored to a waterfront facility.
(3) The ‘‘designated representative’’ is
any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP to act on his
behalf. The on-scene representative may
be on a Coast Guard vessel, or onboard
a federal, state, or local agency vessel
that is authorized to act in support of
the Coast Guard.
Safety Zone; Navy UNDET, Apra Outer
Harbor and Piti, GU
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
RIN 1625–AA00
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
underwater detonation operations in the
waters of Apra Outer Harbor and Piti,
Guam. The Coast Guard believes this
safety zone regulation is necessary to
protect all persons and vessels that
would otherwise transit or be within the
affected areas from possible safety
hazards associated with underwater
detonation operations. Entry of vessels
or persons into these zones is prohibited
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port Guam.
DATES: This rule is effective without
actual notice from May 13, 2016 until
May 16, 2016. For the purposes of
enforcement, actual notice will be used
from May 10, 2016, until May 13, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
0274 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Chief Kristina Gauthier, Sector
Guam, U.S. Coast Guard; (671) 355–
4866, Kristina.M.Gauthier@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
E.O. Executive order
E:\FR\FM\13MYR1.SGM
13MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29770-29772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11253]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2016-0250]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC; Thames River, New London
Harbor, New London, CT
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone
around the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC during its transit through the Long
Island Sound Captain of the Port (COTP) Zone, and for the duration of
its mooring on the Thames River in New London Harbor, New London, CT.
This temporary final rule creates a 250-yard radius security zone
encompassing all navigable waters around the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC while
in transit through Sector Long Island Sound's Captain of the Port
(COTP) Zone, and a 100-yard radius temporary security zone while the
vessel is anchored or moored in the Thames River in New London Harbor,
New London, CT. This zone is needed to protect the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC
and its crew from destruction, loss, or injury from sabotage,
subversive acts, or other malicious acts of a similar nature. Persons
or vessels may not enter the security zone without permission of the
COTP or a COTP designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective without actual notice from May 13, 2016
until May 14, 2016. For the purposes of enforcement, actual notice will
be used from May 1, 2016 until May 13, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0250 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Jay TerVeen, Prevention Department, Coast
Guard Sector Long Island Sound; telephone (203) 468-4446, email
Jay.C.TerVeen@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
[[Page 29771]]
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because an NPRM would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. Consequently, the Coast Guard did not
have enough time to draft, publish, and receive public comment on this
rulemaking via an NPRM and still publish a final rule before the event
was scheduled to take place. Delaying this rulemaking by waiting for a
comment period to run would also reduce the Coast Guard's ability to
fulfill its statutory missions to protect and secure the ports and
waterways of the United States.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), and for the same reasons as stated above,
the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying the effective date of this rule would be contrary to public
interest because immediate action is needed to respond to the potential
security threats associated with having the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC in
U.S. Waters.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under the authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231. The Captain of the Port Long of Island Sound (COTP) has
determined that vessels, within a 250-yard radius of the Tall-Ship
CUAUHTEMOC while it is transiting and a 100-yard radius while it is
moored, pose a potential security risk.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone from May 1, 2016 through May
14, 2016 for the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC. This zone is needed to protect
the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC and its crew from destruction, loss, or injury
from sabotage, subversive acts, or other malicious acts of a similar
nature.
This rule prevents vessels from entering, transiting, mooring, or
anchoring within the security zone unless authorized by the COTP or
designated representative. The Coast Guard has determined that this
security zone will not have a significant impact on vessel traffic due
to its temporary nature, limited size, and the fact that vessels are
allowed to transit the navigable waters outside of the security zone.
The Coast Guard will notify the public and local mariners of this
safety zone through appropriate means, which may include, but are not
limited to, publication in the Federal Register, the Local Notice to
Mariners, and Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on these statutes and Executive Order and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Orders 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
The Coast Guard determined that this rulemaking is not a
significant regulatory action for the following reasons: (1) The
enforcement of this security zone will be relatively short in duration;
(2) persons or vessels desiring to enter the security zone may do so
with permission from the COTP Sector LIS or a designated
representative; (3) this security zone is designed in a way to limit
impacts on vessel traffic, permitting vessels to navigate in other
portions of the waterway not designated as a security zone; and (4) the
Coast Guard will notify the public of the enforcement of this rule via
appropriate means, such as via Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast
Notice to Mariners to increase public awareness of this security zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
[[Page 29772]]
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction Manual
(CIM) M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-
4370f), and have concluded that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule involves the establishment
of a temporary security zone and is categorically excluded from further
review under, paragraph 34(g) of figure 2-1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination will be available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0250 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0250 Security Zone; Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC; Thames River,
New London Harbor, New London, CT.
(a) Location. The following areas are designated as security zones:
(1) All navigable waters within the Sector Long Island Sound
Captain of the Port (COTP) Zone, extending from the surface to the
bottom, within a 250-yard radius of the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC.
(2) All navigable waters within the Thames River in New London
Harbor, New London, CT, extending from the surface to the riverbed
within a 100-yard radius of the Tall-Ship CUAUHTEMOC while it moored or
anchored in the Thames River in New London Harbor, New London, CT.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from May 1,
2016 through May 14, 2016, unless terminated sooner by the COTP.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR
165.33 apply. During the enforcement period, entry into, transit
through, remaining within, mooring or anchoring within this temporary
security zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port (COTP) or the designated representative.
(2) Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the
temporary security zone must comply with all directions given to them
by the COTP or the designated representatives. Those vessels may be
required to be at anchor or moored to a waterfront facility.
(3) The ``designated representative'' is any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been designated by the
COTP to act on his behalf. The on-scene representative may be on a
Coast Guard vessel, or onboard a federal, state, or local agency vessel
that is authorized to act in support of the Coast Guard.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
temporary security zone shall telephone the COTP at (203) 468-4401, or
his designated representative via VHF channel 16 to obtain permission
to do so.
Dated: April 19, 2016.
E.J. Cubanski, III,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Long Island
Sound.
[FR Doc. 2016-11253 Filed 5-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P