Security Zone; Port of New York, Moving Security Zone; Canadian Naval Vessels, 29496-29498 [2016-11251]
Download as PDF
29496
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
mile 59.0, over Sacramento River, at
Sacramento, CA. The vertical lift bridge
navigation span provides a vertical
clearance of 30 feet above Mean High
§ 1308.11 Schedule I.
Water in the closed-to-navigation
*
*
*
*
*
position. The draw operates as required
(h) * * *
by 33 CFR 117.189(a). Navigation on the
(26) N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)waterway is commercial and
N-phenylbutyramide, its isomers,
recreational.
esters, ethers, salts and salts of
The drawspan will be secured in the
isomers, esters and ethers (Other
closed-to-navigation position from 7:30
names: Butyryl fentanyl) .............
(9822)
a.m. to 11 a.m. on May 15, 2016, to
(27) N-[1-[2-hydroxy-2-(thiophen-2allow the community to participate in
yl)ethyl]piperidin-4-yl]-Nthe Capital City Classic Run. This
phenylpropionamide, its isotemporary deviation has been
mers, esters, ethers, salts and
coordinated with the waterway users.
salts of isomers, esters and ethers
(Other
names:
betaNo objections to the proposed
hydroxythiofentanyl) ...................
(9836) temporary deviation were raised.
Vessels able to pass through the
Dated: May 6, 2016.
bridge in the closed position may do so
Chuck Rosenberg,
at any time. The bridge will be able to
Acting Administrator.
open for emergencies and there is no
[FR Doc. 2016–11219 Filed 5–11–16; 8:45 am]
immediate alternate route for vessels to
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
pass. The Coast Guard will also inform
the users of the waterways through our
Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners
of the change in operating schedule for
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
the bridge so that vessels can arrange
SECURITY
their transits to minimize any impact
Coast Guard
caused by the temporary deviation.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
33 CFR Part 117
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0348]
end of the effective period of this
temporary deviation. This deviation
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
from the operating regulations is
Sacramento River, Sacramento, CA
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
Dated: May 3, 2016.
ACTION: Notice of deviation from
D.H. Sulouff,
drawbridge regulation.
2. Amend § 1308.11 by adding
paragraphs (h)(26) and (27) to read as
follows:
■
The Coast Guard has issued a
temporary deviation from the operating
schedule that governs the Tower
Drawbridge across the Sacramento
River, mile 59.0, at Sacramento, CA. The
deviation is necessary to allow the
community to participate in the Capital
City Classic Run. This deviation allows
the bridge to remain in the closed-tonavigation position during the deviation
period.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
7:30 a.m. to 11 a.m. on May 15, 2016.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
deviation, [USCG–2016–0348] is
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
deviation, call or email David H.
Sulouff, Chief, Bridge Section, Eleventh
Coast Guard District; telephone 510–
437–3516, email David.H.Sulouff@
uscg.mil.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
California
Department of Transportation has
requested a temporary change to the
operation of the Tower Drawbridge,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:18 May 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
District Bridge Chief, Eleventh Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2016–11266 Filed 5–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0215]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Port of New York,
Moving Security Zone; Canadian Naval
Vessels
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary moving
security zone around all Canadian Naval
Ships in the New York Harbor, New
York, NY. The moving security zone
will extend 100 yards on all sides of the
ships. The security zone is needed to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
protect the vessels and their respective
crews from potential security threats.
Entry of vessels or persons into this
zone is prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
New York.
DATES: This rule is effective from May
25, 2016 through May 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2016–
0215 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email MST1 R. J. Sampert, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 718–354–4197, email
ronald.j.sampert@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
NPRM with respect to this rule because
the specifics associated with the entry
and transit of the foreign naval vessels
in the harbor were not received in time
to publish an NPRM. Publishing an
NPRM and delaying the effective date of
this rule to await public comments
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest since it would inhibit
the Coast Guard’s ability to fulfill its
statutory missions to protect and secure
the ports and waterways of the United
States.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making it effective less than 30 days
after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to public
interest because immediate action is
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
needed to respond to the potential
security threats associated with having
a foreign nation’s Naval Vessels in U.S.
Waters.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under the authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.
The Captain of the Port of New York
(COTP) has determined that potential
security risks associated with Canadian
Naval Vessels in the Port of New York
will be a security concern for vessels
within a 100-yard radius of all Canadian
Naval Vessels. This rule is needed to
protect the vessels and their respective
crew in the navigable waters within the
security zone while the vessels are
within New York Harbor.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone
from May 25, 2016 through May 31,
2016. The security zone will cover all
navigable waters within 100 yards of all
Canadian Naval Vessels. The duration of
the zone is intended to protect the
vessels and their respective crews in the
navigable waters while in port and
while transiting New York Harbor. No
vessel or person will be permitted to
enter the security zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or
a designated representative.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to
rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these
statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and
Budget.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-year of the safety zone.
Vessel traffic will be able to safely
transit around this security zone which
will impact a small designated area of
the Port of New York South side of Pier
92 for 7 days. Moreover, the Coast
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:18 May 11, 2016
Jkt 238001
Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to
Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel
16 about the zone and the rule allows
vessels to seek permission to enter the
zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29497
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order,
Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, because it
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
security zone lasting less than seven
days that will prohibit entry within 100
yards of the Canadian Naval Vessels. It
is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure
2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. An
environmental analysis checklist
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
29498
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 92 / Thursday, May 12, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
supporting this determination and a
Categorical Exclusion Determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any
comments or information that may lead
to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
[Docket No. USCG–2016–0304]
Security Zone; Portland Rose Festival
on Willamette River
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T01–0215 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T01–0215 Security Zone; Port of New
York, moving Security Zone; Canadian
Naval Vessels.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
33 CFR Part 165
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone: All waters within a 100
yard radius of Canadian Naval Vessels,
from surface to bottom while transiting
from Ambrose Channel to Pier 92 within
the Port of New York, while moored at
Pier 92 and upon departure transiting
back to Ambrose Channel.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port New York (COTP) in the
enforcement of the security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
security zone regulations in subpart D of
this part, you may not enter the security
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
Jkt 238001
[FR Doc. 2016–11251 Filed 5–11–16; 8:45 am]
Coast Guard
■
13:18 May 11, 2016
Dated: April 12, 2016.
M.H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, New York.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
representative via VHF channel 16 or by
phone at (718) 354–4353 (Sector New
York Command Center). Those in the
security zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from May 25, 2016
through May 31, 2016, unless
terminated sooner by the COTP.
The Coast Guard will enforce
the security zone for the Portland Rose
Festival on the Willamette River in
Portland, OR from 11 a.m. on June 9,
2016, through noon on June 13, 2016.
This action is necessary to ensure the
security of vessels participating in the
2016 Portland Rose Festival on the
Willamette River during the event. Our
regulation for the Security Zone
Portland Rose Festival on Willamette
River identifies the regulated area.
During the enforcement period, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the security zone without permission
from the Sector Columbia River Captain
of the Port.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.1312 will be enforced from 11 a.m.
on June 9, 2016, through noon on June
13, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice of
enforcement, call or email Mr. Kenneth
Lawrenson, Waterways Management
Division, MSU Portland, Oregon, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 503–240–9319,
email MSUPDXWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce the security zone for
the Portland Rose Festival detailed in 33
CFR 165.1312 from 11 a.m. on June 9,
2016, through noon on June 13, 2016.
This action is necessary to ensure the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
security of vessels participating in the
2016 Portland Rose Festival on the
Willamette River during the event.
Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.1312 and 33 CFR 165 subpart D, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in
the security zone, consisting of all
waters of the Willamette River, from
surface to bottom, encompassed by the
Hawthorne and Steel Bridges, without
permission from the Sector Columbia
River Captain of the Port. Persons or
vessels wishing to enter the security
zone may request permission to do so
from the on scene Captain of the Port
representative via VHF Channel 16 or
13. The Coast Guard may be assisted by
other Federal, State, or local
enforcement agencies in enforcing this
regulation.
This notice of enforcement is issued
under authority 33 CFR 165.1312 and 5
U.S.C. 552 (a). In addition to this notice
of enforcement in the Federal Register,
the Coast Guard plans to provide
notification of this enforcement period
via the Local Notice to Mariners and
marine information broadcasts.
Dated: April 12, 2016.
D. F. Berliner,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain
of the Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2016–11231 Filed 5–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0534; FRL–9946–29–
Region 9]
Withdrawal of Approval and
Disapproval of Air Quality
Implementation Plans; California; San
Joaquin Valley; Contingency Measures
for the 1997 PM2.5 Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is withdrawing a May 22,
2014 final action approving a state
implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of California
under the Clean Air Act (CAA) to
address contingency measure
requirements for the 1997 annual and
24-hour national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS) for fine particulate
matter (PM2.5) in the San Joaquin Valley.
Simultaneously, EPA is disapproving
this SIP submission. These final actions
are in response to a decision issued by
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 92 (Thursday, May 12, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29496-29498]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11251]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2016-0215]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Port of New York, Moving Security Zone; Canadian
Naval Vessels
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary moving security
zone around all Canadian Naval Ships in the New York Harbor, New York,
NY. The moving security zone will extend 100 yards on all sides of the
ships. The security zone is needed to protect the vessels and their
respective crews from potential security threats. Entry of vessels or
persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by
the Captain of the Port New York.
DATES: This rule is effective from May 25, 2016 through May 31, 2016.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0215 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST1 R. J. Sampert, Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 718-354-4197, email ronald.j.sampert@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a NPRM with respect to this rule
because the specifics associated with the entry and transit of the
foreign naval vessels in the harbor were not received in time to
publish an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM and delaying the effective date of
this rule to await public comments would be impracticable and contrary
to the public interest since it would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability
to fulfill its statutory missions to protect and secure the ports and
waterways of the United States.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making it effective less than 30 days after publication in
the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of this rule would be
contrary to public interest because immediate action is
[[Page 29497]]
needed to respond to the potential security threats associated with
having a foreign nation's Naval Vessels in U.S. Waters.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under the authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231. The Captain of the Port of New York (COTP) has determined
that potential security risks associated with Canadian Naval Vessels in
the Port of New York will be a security concern for vessels within a
100-yard radius of all Canadian Naval Vessels. This rule is needed to
protect the vessels and their respective crew in the navigable waters
within the security zone while the vessels are within New York Harbor.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone from May 25, 2016 through May
31, 2016. The security zone will cover all navigable waters within 100
yards of all Canadian Naval Vessels. The duration of the zone is
intended to protect the vessels and their respective crews in the
navigable waters while in port and while transiting New York Harbor. No
vessel or person will be permitted to enter the security zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and E.O.s, and we discuss
First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-year of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
will be able to safely transit around this security zone which will
impact a small designated area of the Port of New York South side of
Pier 92 for 7 days. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone and the
rule allows vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this
rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a security zone lasting less than seven days that will
prohibit entry within 100 yards of the Canadian Naval Vessels. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis
checklist
[[Page 29498]]
supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination
are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T01-0215 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T01-0215 Security Zone; Port of New York, moving Security
Zone; Canadian Naval Vessels.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters
within a 100 yard radius of Canadian Naval Vessels, from surface to
bottom while transiting from Ambrose Channel to Pier 92 within the Port
of New York, while moored at Pier 92 and upon departure transiting back
to Ambrose Channel.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port New York (COTP) in the enforcement of the security
zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in
subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described
in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative via VHF channel 16 or by phone at (718) 354-4353 (Sector
New York Command Center). Those in the security zone must comply with
all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's
designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from May 25,
2016 through May 31, 2016, unless terminated sooner by the COTP.
Dated: April 12, 2016.
M.H. Day,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, New York.
[FR Doc. 2016-11251 Filed 5-11-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P