Information Sharing and Analysis Organization, 29289-29290 [2016-11128]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2016 / Notices
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
In compliance with Government
Paperwork Elimination Act, States will
be permitted to electronically submit
the information for their security plans,
certification packages, recertifications,
extensions, and written exceptions
processes. States will be permitted to
submit electronic signatures but must
keep the original signature on file.
Additionally, because they contain
sensitive security information (SSI), the
security plans must be handled and
protected in accordance with 49 CFR
part 1520. 6 CFR 37.41(c). The final rule
does not dictate how States must submit
their employees’ fingerprints to the FBI
for background checks; however it is
assumed States will do so via electronic
means or another means determined by
the FBI.
Information provided will be
protected from disclosure to the extent
appropriate under applicable provisions
of the Freedom of Information Act, the
Privacy Act of 1974, the Driver’s Privacy
Protection Act, as well as DHS’s Privacy
Impact Assessment for the REAL ID Act.
There have been no program changes
or new requirements established as a
result of this collection request.
Extensions were covered in the initial
request however it was incorrectly
removed from the subsequent request.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
which:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Analysis
Agency: Office of the Secretary, DHS.
Title: REAL ID: Minimum Standards
for Driver’s Licenses and Identification
Cards Acceptable by Federal Agencies
for Official Purposes.
OMB Number: 1601–0005.
Frequency: Annually.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 May 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
Affected Public: State, local, and tribal
governments.
Number of Respondents: 56.
Estimated Time per Respondent:
1,178 hours.
Total Burden Hours: 446,246 hours.
Dated: May 5, 2016.
Carlene C. Ileto,
Executive Director, Enterprise Business
Management Office.
[FR Doc. 2016–11133 Filed 5–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9B–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket No. DHS–2015–0017]
Information Sharing and Analysis
Organization
Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
This Notice announces a
request for public comment on draft
products produced by the Information
Sharing and Analysis Organization
(ISAO) Standards Organization (SO) in
partnership with the six established
ISAO SO Standards Working Groups
(SWG). This is the first iteration of draft
products that will be used in the
development of voluntary standards for
Information Sharing and Analysis
Organizations (ISAOs) as they relate to
E.O. 13691.
DATES: The comment period for the first
iteration of the SWG draft voluntary
standards for ISAOs will be open until
Friday, June 17, 2016. Comments will be
accepted after this date, but may not be
reflected until later iterations of draft
standards documents.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions concerning the draft
voluntary standards documents, please
contact the ISAO Standards
Organization at Contact@ISAO.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background and Purpose
On February 13, 2015, President
Obama signed E.O. 13691 intended to
enable and facilitate ‘‘private
companies, nonprofit organizations, and
executive departments and agencies
. . . to share information related to
cybersecurity risks and incidents and
collaborate to respond in as close to real
time as possible.’’
In accordance with E.O. 13691, DHS
has entered into a cooperative
agreement with a non-governmental
ISAO SO led by the University of Texas
at San Antonio with support from the
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29289
Logistics Management Institute (LMI)
and the Retail Cyber Intelligence
Sharing Center (R–CISC). The ISAO SO
is working with existing information
sharing organizations, owners and
operators of critical infrastructure,
relevant agencies, and other public and
private sector stakeholders to identify a
common set of voluntary standards or
guidelines for the creation and
functioning of ISAOs.
As part of this collaborative,
transparent, and industry-driven
process, the ISAO SO has established
six working groups to assist in the
development of voluntary standards.
This notice is to request comment on
the initial working group draft products.
Your participation in this comment
process is highly encouraged to ensure
all equities are being met. To join a
working group or to find out how else
you can best participate, please visit
www.ISAO.org or email Contact@
ISAO.org.
Meeting Details
To view details on the corresponding
May 19, 2016 in person meeting in
Anaheim, CA, please visit the Notice of
Public Meeting Federal Register Notice
and visit www.ISAO.org.
Submitting Written Comments
The initial draft documents can be
found and comments submitted directly
to the ISAO SO at https://
www.ISAO.org/products/drafts/. This
method is preferred by the ISAO SO.
You may also submit written
comments to the docket using one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Although
this is not a rulemaking action,
comments are being submitted to the
Federal eRulemaking Portal in an effort
to provide transparency to the general
public.
(2) Email: Contact@ISAO.org. Include
the docket number in the subject line of
the message.
(3) Mail: ISAO Standards
Organization, c/o LMI, 1777 NE Loop
410, Suite 808, San Antonio, TX 78217–
5217.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these four methods. All
comments must either be submitted to
the online docket on or before June 17,
2016, or reach the Docket Management
Facility by that date.
Comments may be submitted directly
to the ISAO SO using the method
described above after June 17, 2016.
However, these comments may not be
reflected until later iterations of draft
standards documents.
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
29290
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2016 / Notices
References
Executive Order 13691 can be found
at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/thepress-office/2015/02/13/executiveorder-promoting-private-sectorcybersecurity-information-shari.
For additional information about the
ISAO Standards Organization, draft
products, and how you can best
participate in the standards
development process, please go to
www.ISAO.org or email Contact@
ISAO.org.
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 131–134; 6 CFR 29;
E.O. 13691.
Dated: May 9, 2016.
Andy Ozment,
Assistant Secretary, Cybersecurity and
Communications, National Protection and
Programs Directorate, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2016–11128 Filed 5–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5948–N–01]
Mortgagee Review Board:
Administrative Actions
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing–Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with Section
202(c)(5) of the National Housing Act,
this notice advises of the cause and
description of administrative actions
taken by HUD’s Mortgagee Review
Board against HUD-approved
mortgagees.
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy A. Murray, Secretary to the
Mortgagee Review Board, 451 Seventh
Street SW., Room B–133/3150,
Washington, DC 20410–8000; telephone
(202) 708–2224 (this is not a toll-free
number). Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Information Service at (800)
877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
202(c)(5) of the National Housing Act
(12 U.S.C. 1708(c)(5)) requires that HUD
‘‘publish a description of and the cause
for administrative action against a HUDapproved mortgagee’’ by the
Department’s Mortgagee Review Board
(‘‘Board’’). In compliance with the
requirements of Section 202(c)(5), this
notice advises of actions that have been
taken by the Board in its meetings from
October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:20 May 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
I. Civil Money Penalties, Withdrawals
of FHA Approval, Suspensions,
Probations, Reprimands, and
Settlements
1. Allied First Bank, SB, Oswego, IL
[Docket No. 15–1506–MR]
Action: On June 19, 2015, the Board
entered into a settlement agreement
with Allied First Bank, SB (‘‘AFB’’) that
required AFB to pay a civil money
penalty in the amount of $17,000
without admitting fault or liability.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements alleged by
HUD: AFB (a) improperly used the
name of FHA in certain correspondence
to imply the correspondence was from
and/or endorsed by HUD/FHA; (b)
failed to timely notify HUD that AFB
has entered into a written agreement
with the Federal Reserve Board of
Chicago on May 22, 2014 and; (c) failed
to timely notify HUD that AFB had
entered into a consent order with the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
and the State of Illinois Department of
Financial and Professional Regulation.
2. American Home Free Mortgage,
Prosper, TX [Docket No. 14–1682–
MR]
Action: On May 21, 2015, the Board
voted to withdraw the FHA approval of
American Home Free Mortgage
(‘‘AHFM’’) on a permanent basis. On
July 24, 2015, the Board entered into a
settlement agreement with AHFM that
required AHFM to pay a civil money
penalty in the amount of $169,419, and
to abide by the Board’s action
concerning the permanent withdrawal
of its FHA approval.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements alleged by
HUD: AHFM (a) submitted false
certifications to HUD/FHA in 2010,
2012 and 2013 for the annual
recertifications of its FHA approval; (b)
failed to ensure that individuals
originating FHA insured loans were
exclusively employed by AHFM; (c)
failed to implement a Quality Control
Plan in compliance with HUD/FHA
requirements; (d) failed to conduct
Quality Control reviews in accordance
with HUD/FHA requirements; (e)
participated in a scheme to inflate the
amount of fees collected in loan
transactions by disguising them as
construction fees; (f) submitted loan
case binders that falsely identified fees
as construction costs or fees; (g)
provided false certifications to HUD/
FHA regarding conflicts of interests; (h)
allowed personnel involved in the dayto-day origination process to conduct
Quality Control reviews; (i) allowed the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
identification number of a terminated
employee to be used to access FHA
Connection; and (j) failed to require it’s
appraiser to explain the use of a
comparable sale that was over 12
months old.
3. Bogman Inc., Silver Spring, MD
[Docket No. 15–1507–MR]
Action: On August 11, 2015, the
Board entered into a settlement
agreement with Bogman Inc.,
(‘‘Bogman’’) that required Bogman to
pay a civil money penalty in the amount
of $50,000 without admitting fault or
liability and to submit, on a quarterly
basis during the period of one year,
written reports, describing the
methodology and findings of quality
control reviews performed by an
independent third party regarding
Bogman’s compliance with applicable
HUD Handbooks and Mortgagee Letters,
including compliance with servicing
and loss mitigation requirements.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements alleged by
HUD: Bogman (a) failed to properly
establish and implement a Quality
Control Plan; (b) used the services of a
third party servicer that was not an
approved HUD/FHA approved
mortgagee; (c) failed to properly service
defaulted FHA insured loans and failed
to ensure its foreclosure management
review checklist was in compliance
with HUD/FHA requirements; and (d)
failed to use the proper loss mitigation
techniques with borrowers.
4. City First Mortgage Services LLC.,
Bountiful, UT [Docket No. 15–
1657–MR]
Action: On June 30, 2015, the Board
issued a letter of reprimand to City First
Mortgage Services, LLC., (‘‘CFMS’’), and
also required CFMS to pay a civil
money penalty in the amount of
$40,500.
Cause: The Board took this action
based on the following violations of
HUD/FHA requirements alleged by
HUD: CFMS (a) failed to comply with
Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles; (b) falsely certified to HUD/
FHA that it had complied with all HUF/
FHA regulations in its June 25, 2014
annual certification; (c) failed to
promptly notify HUD/FHA it had
entered into a consent order with the
State of Illinois Department of Financial
and Professional Regulation, Division of
Banking and paid a $2,500 fine to settle
allegations that it allowed an unlicensed
office, branch manager and loan
originator to conduct business without
the proper licenses or sponsorship from
CFMS; and (d) failed to timely notify
HUD/FHA that it had entered into a
E:\FR\FM\11MYN1.SGM
11MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29289-29290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11128]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
[Docket No. DHS-2015-0017]
Information Sharing and Analysis Organization
AGENCY: Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Notice announces a request for public comment on draft
products produced by the Information Sharing and Analysis Organization
(ISAO) Standards Organization (SO) in partnership with the six
established ISAO SO Standards Working Groups (SWG). This is the first
iteration of draft products that will be used in the development of
voluntary standards for Information Sharing and Analysis Organizations
(ISAOs) as they relate to E.O. 13691.
DATES: The comment period for the first iteration of the SWG draft
voluntary standards for ISAOs will be open until Friday, June 17, 2016.
Comments will be accepted after this date, but may not be reflected
until later iterations of draft standards documents.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions concerning the
draft voluntary standards documents, please contact the ISAO Standards
Organization at Contact@ISAO.org.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background and Purpose
On February 13, 2015, President Obama signed E.O. 13691 intended to
enable and facilitate ``private companies, nonprofit organizations, and
executive departments and agencies . . . to share information related
to cybersecurity risks and incidents and collaborate to respond in as
close to real time as possible.''
In accordance with E.O. 13691, DHS has entered into a cooperative
agreement with a non-governmental ISAO SO led by the University of
Texas at San Antonio with support from the Logistics Management
Institute (LMI) and the Retail Cyber Intelligence Sharing Center (R-
CISC). The ISAO SO is working with existing information sharing
organizations, owners and operators of critical infrastructure,
relevant agencies, and other public and private sector stakeholders to
identify a common set of voluntary standards or guidelines for the
creation and functioning of ISAOs.
As part of this collaborative, transparent, and industry-driven
process, the ISAO SO has established six working groups to assist in
the development of voluntary standards. This notice is to request
comment on the initial working group draft products. Your participation
in this comment process is highly encouraged to ensure all equities are
being met. To join a working group or to find out how else you can best
participate, please visit www.ISAO.org or email Contact@ISAO.org.
Meeting Details
To view details on the corresponding May 19, 2016 in person meeting
in Anaheim, CA, please visit the Notice of Public Meeting Federal
Register Notice and visit www.ISAO.org.
Submitting Written Comments
The initial draft documents can be found and comments submitted
directly to the ISAO SO at https://www.ISAO.org/products/drafts/. This
method is preferred by the ISAO SO.
You may also submit written comments to the docket using one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Although this is not a rulemaking action, comments are being submitted
to the Federal eRulemaking Portal in an effort to provide transparency
to the general public.
(2) Email: Contact@ISAO.org. Include the docket number in the
subject line of the message.
(3) Mail: ISAO Standards Organization, c/o LMI, 1777 NE Loop 410,
Suite 808, San Antonio, TX 78217-5217.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods.
All comments must either be submitted to the online docket on or before
June 17, 2016, or reach the Docket Management Facility by that date.
Comments may be submitted directly to the ISAO SO using the method
described above after June 17, 2016. However, these comments may not be
reflected until later iterations of draft standards documents.
[[Page 29290]]
References
Executive Order 13691 can be found at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/02/13/executive-order-promoting-private-sector-cybersecurity-information-shari.
For additional information about the ISAO Standards Organization,
draft products, and how you can best participate in the standards
development process, please go to www.ISAO.org or email
Contact@ISAO.org.
Authority: 6 U.S.C. 131-134; 6 CFR 29; E.O. 13691.
Dated: May 9, 2016.
Andy Ozment,
Assistant Secretary, Cybersecurity and Communications, National
Protection and Programs Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2016-11128 Filed 5-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P