Federal Acquisition Regulation: Combating Trafficking in Persons-Definition of “Recruitment Fees”, 29244-29247 [2016-11056]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
29244
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
government facility. Individuals
planning to attend the hearing should be
prepared to show valid picture
identification to the security staff in
order to gain access to the meeting
room. The REAL ID Act, passed by
Congress in 2005, established new
requirements for entering federal
facilities. These requirements took effect
July 21, 2014. If your driver’s license is
issued by American Samoa, Illinois or
Missouri, you must present an
additional form of identification to enter
the federal building where the public
hearing will be held. Enhanced driver’s
licenses from Minnesota and
Washington are acceptable. Acceptable
alternative forms of identification
include: federal employee badges,
passports, enhanced driver’s licenses
and military identification cards. For
additional information for the status of
your state regarding REAL ID, go to
https://www.dhs.gov/real-idenforcement-brief. In addition, you will
need to obtain a property pass for any
personal belongings you bring with you.
Upon leaving the building, you will be
required to return this property pass to
the security desk. No large signs will be
allowed in the building, cameras may
only be used outside of the building,
and demonstrations will not be allowed
on federal property for security reasons.
No drugs or drug paraphernalia
(including marijuana) allowed.
If you would like to present oral
testimony at the hearing, please notify
Ms. Pamela Long, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Planning Division, (C504–01), Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone
(919) 541–0641, fax number (919) 541–
5509, email address long.pam@epa.gov,
no later than 4:00 p.m. EDT on May 31,
2016. Ms. Long will arrange a general
time slot for you to speak. The EPA will
make every effort to follow the schedule
as closely as possible on the day of the
hearing.
Oral testimony will be limited to 5
minutes for each commenter. The EPA
encourages commenters to provide the
EPA with a copy of their oral testimony
electronically (via email) or in hard
copy form. The EPA will not provide
audiovisual equipment for presentations
unless we receive special requests in
advance. Commenters should notify Ms.
Long if they will need specific
equipment. Commenters should also
notify Ms. Long if they need specific
translation services for non-English
speaking commenters.
The hearing schedule, including the
list of speakers, will be posted on the
EPA’s Web site at https://www.epa.gov/
visibility prior to the hearing. Verbatim
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 May 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
transcripts of the hearing and written
statements will be included in the
docket for the rulemaking.
How can I get copies of this document
and other related information?
The EPA has established a docket for
the proposed rule ‘‘Protection of
Visibility: Amendments to
Requirements for State Plans’’ under
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–
0531 (available at https://
www.regulations.gov). The EPA has
made available information related to
the proposed rule at the following Web
site: https://www.epa.gov/visibility.
Dated: May 5, 2016.
Stephen Page,
Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards.
[FR Doc. 2016–11007 Filed 5–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 22 and 52
[FAR Case 2015–017; Docket No. 2015–
0017; Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000–AN02
Federal Acquisition Regulation:
Combating Trafficking in Persons—
Definition of ‘‘Recruitment Fees’’
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to provide
a definition of ‘‘recruitment fees.’’ The
FAR policy on combating trafficking in
persons prohibits contractors from
charging employees recruitment fees, in
accordance with the Executive Order
entitled ‘‘Strengthening Protections
Against Trafficking in Persons in
Federal Contracts.’’
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat at one of the addresses
shown below on or before July 11, 2016
to be considered in the formation of the
final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to FAR Case 2015–017 by any
of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
• Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching for ‘‘FAR Case 2015–017’’.
Select the link ‘‘Comment Now’’ that
corresponds with ‘‘FAR Case 2015–
017’’. Follow the instructions on the
screen. Please include your name,
company name (if any), and ‘‘FAR Case
2015–017’’ on your attached document.
• Mail: General Services
Administration, Regulatory Secretariat
(MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Flowers, 1800 F
Street NW., 2nd Floor, Washington, DC
20405–0001.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite FAR Case 2015–017:
Combating Trafficking in Persons—
Definition of ‘‘Recruitment Fees’’ in all
correspondence related to this case.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided. To confirm
receipt of your comment(s), please
check www.regulations.gov,
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting (except
allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst,
at 202–219–0202 for clarification of
content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat Division at
202–501–4755. Please cite FAR Case
2015–017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing
to revise the FAR to add a definition of
‘‘recruitment fees’’ to subpart 22.17,
Combating Trafficking in Persons, and
the associated clause at 52.222–50.
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a
final rule entitled Ending Trafficking in
Persons (FAR Case 2013–001) in the
Federal Register at 80 FR 4967, on
January 29, 2015. That rule, which
implemented Executive Order 13627
and title XVII of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013,
became effective on March 2, 2015. As
implemented in that rule, the policy at
FAR section 22.1703(a) and in the
clause at 52.222–50(b) prohibits
contractors, contractor employees,
subcontractors, subcontractor
employees, and their agents from
charging employees recruitment fees.
II. Discussion and Analysis
A. Early Discussion and Analysis
To provide an opportunity for early
input, the Defense Acquisition
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Regulations Council and the Civilian
Agency Acquisition Council (the
Councils) posted on January 28, 2015, at
https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/ a
draft definition of ‘‘recruitment fees,’’
developed by an interagency group of
policy experts on human trafficking.
Comments were received from four
respondents and are available for
viewing at that Web site.
The divergence in public input
highlighted the tension between
providing a comprehensive definition of
the term to maximize worker
protections, and of ensuring that the
definition does not elicit unintended
consequences that interfere with
contractor business operations. As a
result, while the Council has made some
changes to the rule to reflect initial
input, it has also included a number of
questions that warrant additional input
from the public (see Section III).
The Councils made some revisions to
the draft definition of ‘‘recruitment
fees,’’ such as—
• Addressing fees, charges, costs,
assessments, or other financial
obligations assessed against employees
or potential employees, associated with
the recruiting process, regardless of the
manner or timing of their imposition or
collection;
• Including charges for testing and
training;
• Modifying language to include tips
paid as a kickback; and
• Adding language interpreters or
translators.
The Councils did not modify the
definition of ‘‘employee’’ because the
rationale for this narrower definition
was specifically addressed in the
Federal Register with the publication of
the second interim rule under FAR Case
2005–012, Implementation of Section
3(b) of the Trafficking Victims
Reauthorization Act of 2003, published
in the Federal Register at 72 FR 46335,
46337, and 46338, on August 17, 2007,
and in the final rule published at 74 FR
2741, 2742, and 2743, on January 15,
2009.
The Councils also note that the
Department of State Exchange Visitor
Program is not subject to the FAR and
program fees charged under that
program are not considered recruitment
fees, as defined in this proposed rule, as
was addressed in the preamble to the
final rule under FAR Case 2013–001
published in the Federal Register at 80
FR 4971, on January 29, 2015.
B. Issues Highlighted for Public
Comments
The early public comments, while
helpful, have raised a number of
questions for the FAR drafters as they
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 May 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
29245
work to promulgate a definition that is
both effective in reinforcing the
prohibition on recruitment fees and
understandable and manageable for
contractors.
The Councils invite public comment
on all aspects of the proposed
definition. However, in particular, the
Councils request comments on the
following questions:
• Are all costs/fees associated with
bringing an employee on board properly
treated as recruitment fees?
• Are there any additional charges
that should be considered recruitment
fees?
• Should the definition of a
recruitment fee vary depending on
whether the job is a professional highpaying, high-skill job or an unskilled,
low-paying job? Is the location of the job
a factor?
• Are the boundaries (i.e., limitations)
of the proposed definition clear? If not,
what changes would make the
limitations clearer?
• As a general matter, is the
illustrative list of recruitment fees
helpful in understanding what costs an
employee may not be charged? If not,
why not?
• What, if any, of the specifically
enumerated fees in the proposed
definition should be excluded and why?
• What, if any, of the specifically
enumerated fees not included in the
proposed definition should be added?
terminal fees, and travel taxes
associated with travel from sending
country to receiving country and the
return journey at the end of the contract.
• Transportation and subsistence
costs from the airport or disembarkation
point to the worksite.
• Security deposits and bonds.
• The inclusion of a collateral
requirement, such as land deeds, in
contracts.
• Contract breach fees.
• An employer’s recruiters, agents or
attorneys, or other notary or legal fees.
• Insurance.
• Contributions to worker welfare
funds or government provided benefits
in sending countries required to be paid
by supplier.
C. Specific Elements of the Definition
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was
subject to review under Section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This
proposed rule is not a major rule under
5 U.S.C. 804.
The Councils especially welcome
feedback on the following specific
aspects of the proposed rule. For each
of the following, please comment on
whether addition of the following
described language to the illustrative list
of recruitment fee would be helpful,
unhelpful, or of no impact, and why.
• Submitting applications, making
recommendations, recruiting, reserving,
committing, soliciting, identifying,
considering, interviewing, referring,
retaining, transferring, selection, or
placing potential job applicants.
• Labor broker services, both onetime and recurring.
• Exit clearances, and security
clearances associated with visas.
• Sending, transit and receiving
country government-mandated fees,
levies, and insurance.
• Pre-employment medical
examinations or vaccinations in the
sending country.
• Receiving country medical
examinations.
• Transportation and subsistence
costs while in transit, including, but not
limited to, airfare or costs of other
modes of international transportation,
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
III. Determinations
Determinations were made in
connection with the final rule
implementing title XVII (entitled
‘‘Ending Trafficking in Government
Contracting (ETGCA)’’) of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2013 to apply these statutory
regulations. For an explanation of the
Council’s determinations, see the
preamble published in the Federal
Register at 80 FR 4967 and 4983–4986,
on January 29, 2015. This proposed rule
just clarifies the requirements by adding
a definition.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA do not expect
proposed change to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. However, an
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(IRFA) has been prepared and is
summarized as follows:
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
29246
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
The reason for this action is to develop a
standard definition of ‘‘recruitment fees’’ in
order to clarify how the Government treats
this prohibited practice that has been
associated with labor trafficking, within the
scope of application of the FAR.
The objective of this rule is to clarify the
types of charges and fees that contractors,
subcontractors, and their employees or agents
are prohibited from charging to employees or
potential employees, under the Government
policy on combating trafficking in persons.
This proposed rule would apply to all
entities, whether small or other than small,
that are contractors or subcontractors on U.S.
Government contracts. In 2014 there were
about 350,000 active registrants in the
System for Award Management (SAM). DoD,
GSA, and NASA estimate approximately half
of the registrants (175,000) are small entities
that will receive a contract or subcontract in
a particular year. However, there would be
no actual impact from this rule unless the
small entity was planning to charge or allow
another entity, acting on their behalf, to
charge a recruitment fee to an employee or
potential employee. There is no data
available to estimate this impact. Further, for
the definition of ‘‘small business,’’ the
Regulatory Flexibility Act refers to the Small
Business Act, which in turn allows the U.S.
Small Business Administration (SBA)
Administrator to specify detailed definitions
or standards (5 U.S.C. 601(3) and 15 U.S.C.
632(a)). The SBA regulations at 13 CFR
121.105(a)(1) discuss who is a small
business: ‘‘Except for small agricultural
cooperatives, a business concern eligible for
assistance from SBA as a small business is a
business entity organized for profit, with a
place of business located in the United
States, and which operates primarily within
the United States or which makes a
significant contribution to the U.S. economy
through payment of taxes or use of American
products, materials or labor.’’ So, this initial
regulatory flexibility analysis does not need
to address impact on foreign small entities
with Government contracts or subcontracts
that are not small businesses as defined by
the Small Business Act.
There are no reporting or recordkeeping
requirements associated with this rule.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with any other Federal rules.
There were no significant alternatives
identified that would meet the objective of
the rule.
The Regulatory Secretariat Division
has submitted a copy of the IRFA to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration. A copy of the
IRFA may be obtained from the
Regulatory Secretariat Division. DoD,
GSA and NASA invite comments from
small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected
impact of this rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also
consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in
subparts affected by this proposed rule
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610.
Interested parties must submit such
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 May 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (FAR Case 2015–017), in
correspondence.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain
any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 22 and
52
Government procurement.
Dated: May 5, 2016.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA and NASA
propose amending 48 CFR parts 22 and
52 as set forth below:
■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
parts 22 and 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C.
chapter 137; and 51 U.S.C. 20113.
PART 22—APPLICATION OF LABOR
LAWS TO GOVERNMENT
ACQUISITIONS
2. Amend section 22.1702 by adding,
in alphabetical order, the definition
‘‘Recruitment fees’’ to read as follows:
■
22.1702
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Recruitment fees means the following:
(1) Recruitment fees include, but are
not limited to, fees, charges, costs,
assessments, or other financial
obligations assessed against employees
or potential employees, associated with
the recruiting process, regardless of the
manner of their imposition or
collection—
(i) For soliciting, identifying,
considering, interviewing, referring,
retaining, transferring, selecting, testing,
training, providing new-hire orientation,
recommending, or placing employees or
potential employees;
(ii) For covering the cost, in whole or
in part, of advertising;
(iii) For any activity related to
obtaining permanent or temporary labor
certification;
(iv) For processing petitions;
(v) For visas and any fee that
facilitates an employee obtaining a visa
such as appointment and application
fees;
(vi) For government-mandated costs
such as border crossing fees;
(vii) For procuring photographs and
identity documentation, including any
nongovernmental passport fees;
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(viii) Charged as a condition of access
to the job opportunity, including
procuring medical examinations and
immunizations and obtaining
background, reference and security
clearance checks and examinations;
additional certifications;
(ix) For an employer’s recruiters,
agents or attorneys, or other notary or
legal fees; and
(x) For language interpreters or
translators.
(2) Any fee, charge, cost, or
assessment may be a recruitment fee
regardless of whether the payment is in
property or money, deducted from
wages, paid back in wage or benefit
concessions, paid back as a kickback,
bribe, in-kind payment, free labor, tip,
or tribute, remitted in connection with
recruitment, or collected by an
employer or a third party, including, but
not limited to—
(i) Agents;
(ii) Recruiters;
(iii) Staffing firms (including private
employment and placement firms);
(iv) Subsidiaries/affiliates of the
employer;
(v) Any agent or employee of such
entities; and
(vi) Subcontractors at all tiers.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend section 22.1703 by—
■ a. Revising paragraph (a)(5)(i); and
■ b. Removing from paragraph (a)(6) the
word ‘‘employees’’ and adding
‘‘employees or potential employees’’ in
its place.
The revisions read as follows:
22.1703
Policy.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(5)(i) Using misleading or fraudulent
practices during the recruitment of
employees or offering of employment,
such as failing to disclose, in a format
and language understood by the
employee or potential employee, basic
information or making material
misrepresentations during the
recruitment of employees regarding the
key terms and conditions of
employment, including wages and
fringe benefits, the location of work, the
living conditions, housing and
associated costs (if employer or agent
provided or arranged), any significant
costs to be charged to the employee or
potential employee, and, if applicable,
the hazardous nature of the work;
*
*
*
*
*
PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS
AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
■
4. Amend section 52.212–5 by—
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
29247
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
a. Revising the date of the clause and
paragraphs (b)(33)(i) and (e)(1)(xi)(A);
and
■ b. In alternate II, revising the date and
paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(J)(1).
The revisions read as follows:
■
52.212–5 Contract Terms and Conditions
Required to Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders—Commercial Items.
*
*
*
*
*
Contract Terms and Conditions Required To
Implement Statutes or Executive Orders—
Commercial Items (DATE)
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
ll(33)(i) 52.222–50, Combating Trafficking
in Persons (DATE) (22 U.S.C. chapter 78
and E.O. 13627).
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(1) * * *
(xi) * * *
ll(A) 52.222–50, Combating Trafficking in
Persons (DATE) (22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and
E.O 13627).
*
*
*
*
*
Alternate II (DATE). * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(J) ll(1) 52.222–50, Combating
Trafficking in Persons (DATE) (22 U.S.C.
chapter 78 and E.O 13627).
*
*
*
*
*
5. Amend section 52.213–4 by
revising the date of the clause and
paragraphs (a)(2)(viii) and (b)(1)(viii)(A)
to read as follows:
■
52.213–4 Terms and Conditions—
Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than
Commercial Items).
*
*
*
*
*
Terms and Conditions—Simplified
Acquisitions (Other Than Commercial Items)
(DATE)
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(viii) 52.244–6, Subcontracts for
Commercial Items (DATE).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii)(A) 52.222–50, Combating Trafficking
in Persons (DATE) (22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and
E.O 13627) (Applies to all solicitations and
contracts).
*
*
*
*
*
6. Amend section 52.222–50 by—
a. Revising the date of the clause;
b. Adding to paragraph (a), in
alphabetical order, the definition
‘‘Recruitment fees’’;
■ c. Revising paragraph (b)(5)(i);
■ d. Removing from paragraph (b)(6) the
word ‘‘employees’’ and adding
‘‘employees or potential employees’’ in
its place; and
■ e. Removing from paragraph (h)(3)(iii)
the word ‘‘employee,’’ and adding
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
■
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:58 May 10, 2016
Jkt 238001
‘‘employee or potential employee,’’ in
its place.
The revisions and addition read as
follows:
52.222–50
Persons.
Combating Trafficking in
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5)(i) Using misleading or fraudulent
practices during the recruitment of
employees or offering of employment, such
as failing to disclose, in a format and
language understood by the employee or
potential employee, basic information or
making material misrepresentations during
the recruitment of employees regarding the
key terms and conditions of employment,
including wages and fringe benefits, the
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
7. Amend section 52.244–6 by
revising the date of the clause and
paragraph (c)(1)(x)(A) to read as follows:
■
Combating Trafficking in Persons (DATE)
(a) * * *
Recruitment fees means the following:
(1) Recruitment fees include, but are not
limited to, fees, charges, costs, assessments,
or other financial obligations assessed against
employees or potential employees, associated
with the recruiting process, regardless of the
manner of their imposition or collection—
(i) For soliciting, identifying, considering,
interviewing, referring, retaining,
transferring, selecting, testing, training,
providing new-hire orientation,
recommending, or placing employees or
potential employees;
(ii) For covering the cost, in whole or in
part, of advertising;
(iii) For any activity related to obtaining
permanent or temporary labor certification;
(iv) For processing petitions;
(v) For visas and any fee that facilitates an
employee obtaining a visa such as
appointment and application fees;
(vi) For government-mandated costs such
as border crossing fees;
(vii) For procuring photographs and
identity documentation, including any
nongovernmental passport fees;
(viii) Charged as a condition of access to
the job opportunity, including procuring
medical examinations and immunizations
and obtaining background, reference and
security clearance checks and examinations;
additional certifications;
(ix) For an employer’s recruiters, agents or
attorneys, or other notary or legal fees, and
(x) For language interpreters or translators.
(2) Any fee, charge, cost, or assessment
may be a recruitment fee regardless of
whether the payment is in property or
money, deducted from wages, paid back in
wage or benefit concessions, paid back as a
kickback, bribe, in-kind payment, free labor,
tip, or tribute, remitted in connection with
recruitment, or collected by an employer or
a third party, including, but not limited to—
(i) Agents;
(ii) Recruiters;
(iii) Staffing firms (including private
employment and placement firms);
(iv) Subsidiaries/affiliates of the employer;
(v) Any agent or employee of such entities;
and
(vi) Subcontractors at all tiers.
*
location of work, the living conditions,
housing and associated costs (if employer or
agent provided or arranged), any significant
costs to be charged to the employee or
potential employee, and, if applicable, the
hazardous nature of the work;
52.244–6
Items.
*
*
Subcontracts for Commercial
*
*
*
Subcontracts for Commercial Items (DATE)
*
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) * * *
(x)(A) 52.222–50, Combating Trafficking in
Persons (DATE) (22 U.S.C. chapter 78 and
E.O. 13627).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2016–11056 Filed 5–10–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 190, 191, 192, 195, and
199
[Docket No. PHMSA–2016–0032]
Pipeline Safety: Meeting of the Gas
Pipeline Safety Advisory Committee
and the Liquid Pipeline Safety
Advisory Committee
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of advisory committee
meeting.
AGENCY:
This notice announces a
public meeting of the Gas Pipeline
Advisory Committee (GPAC), also
known as the Technical Pipeline Safety
Standards Committee, and the Liquid
Pipeline Advisory Committee (LPAC),
also known as the Technical Hazardous
Liquid Pipeline Safety Standards
Committee. The GPAC will meet to
discuss a proposed rulemaking to
address regulatory requirements
involving plastic piping systems used in
gas services and both committees will
meet jointly to discuss a proposed
rulemaking to strengthen the federal
pipeline safety regulations and to
address sections 9 (accident and
incident reporting) and 13 (cost
recovery for design-review work) of the
Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty,
and Job Creation Act of 2011 (2011 Act).
Both committees will also be briefed on
the ‘‘Pipeline Safety: Safety of Gas
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11MYP1.SGM
11MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 29244-29247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11056]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 22 and 52
[FAR Case 2015-017; Docket No. 2015-0017; Sequence No. 1]
RIN 9000-AN02
Federal Acquisition Regulation: Combating Trafficking in
Persons--Definition of ``Recruitment Fees''
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to provide a definition of ``recruitment
fees.'' The FAR policy on combating trafficking in persons prohibits
contractors from charging employees recruitment fees, in accordance
with the Executive Order entitled ``Strengthening Protections Against
Trafficking in Persons in Federal Contracts.''
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat at one of the addresses shown below on or before
July 11, 2016 to be considered in the formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to FAR Case 2015-017 by any of
the following methods:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for ``FAR Case
2015-017''. Select the link ``Comment Now'' that corresponds with ``FAR
Case 2015-017''. Follow the instructions on the screen. Please include
your name, company name (if any), and ``FAR Case 2015-017'' on your
attached document.
Mail: General Services Administration, Regulatory
Secretariat (MVCB), ATTN: Ms. Flowers, 1800 F Street NW., 2nd Floor,
Washington, DC 20405-0001.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite FAR Case 2015-
017: Combating Trafficking in Persons--Definition of ``Recruitment
Fees'' in all correspondence related to this case. Comments received
generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal and/or business confidential information
provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check
www.regulations.gov, approximately two to three days after submission
to verify posting (except allow 30 days for posting of comments
submitted by mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement
Analyst, at 202-219-0202 for clarification of content. For information
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory
Secretariat Division at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAR Case 2015-017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to revise the FAR to add a
definition of ``recruitment fees'' to subpart 22.17, Combating
Trafficking in Persons, and the associated clause at 52.222-50.
DoD, GSA, and NASA published a final rule entitled Ending
Trafficking in Persons (FAR Case 2013-001) in the Federal Register at
80 FR 4967, on January 29, 2015. That rule, which implemented Executive
Order 13627 and title XVII of the National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2013, became effective on March 2, 2015. As implemented
in that rule, the policy at FAR section 22.1703(a) and in the clause at
52.222-50(b) prohibits contractors, contractor employees,
subcontractors, subcontractor employees, and their agents from charging
employees recruitment fees.
II. Discussion and Analysis
A. Early Discussion and Analysis
To provide an opportunity for early input, the Defense Acquisition
[[Page 29245]]
Regulations Council and the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (the
Councils) posted on January 28, 2015, at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/ a draft definition of ``recruitment fees,'' developed by an
interagency group of policy experts on human trafficking. Comments were
received from four respondents and are available for viewing at that
Web site.
The divergence in public input highlighted the tension between
providing a comprehensive definition of the term to maximize worker
protections, and of ensuring that the definition does not elicit
unintended consequences that interfere with contractor business
operations. As a result, while the Council has made some changes to the
rule to reflect initial input, it has also included a number of
questions that warrant additional input from the public (see Section
III).
The Councils made some revisions to the draft definition of
``recruitment fees,'' such as--
Addressing fees, charges, costs, assessments, or other
financial obligations assessed against employees or potential
employees, associated with the recruiting process, regardless of the
manner or timing of their imposition or collection;
Including charges for testing and training;
Modifying language to include tips paid as a kickback; and
Adding language interpreters or translators.
The Councils did not modify the definition of ``employee'' because
the rationale for this narrower definition was specifically addressed
in the Federal Register with the publication of the second interim rule
under FAR Case 2005-012, Implementation of Section 3(b) of the
Trafficking Victims Reauthorization Act of 2003, published in the
Federal Register at 72 FR 46335, 46337, and 46338, on August 17, 2007,
and in the final rule published at 74 FR 2741, 2742, and 2743, on
January 15, 2009.
The Councils also note that the Department of State Exchange
Visitor Program is not subject to the FAR and program fees charged
under that program are not considered recruitment fees, as defined in
this proposed rule, as was addressed in the preamble to the final rule
under FAR Case 2013-001 published in the Federal Register at 80 FR
4971, on January 29, 2015.
B. Issues Highlighted for Public Comments
The early public comments, while helpful, have raised a number of
questions for the FAR drafters as they work to promulgate a definition
that is both effective in reinforcing the prohibition on recruitment
fees and understandable and manageable for contractors.
The Councils invite public comment on all aspects of the proposed
definition. However, in particular, the Councils request comments on
the following questions:
Are all costs/fees associated with bringing an employee on
board properly treated as recruitment fees?
Are there any additional charges that should be considered
recruitment fees?
Should the definition of a recruitment fee vary depending
on whether the job is a professional high-paying, high-skill job or an
unskilled, low-paying job? Is the location of the job a factor?
Are the boundaries (i.e., limitations) of the proposed
definition clear? If not, what changes would make the limitations
clearer?
As a general matter, is the illustrative list of
recruitment fees helpful in understanding what costs an employee may
not be charged? If not, why not?
What, if any, of the specifically enumerated fees in the
proposed definition should be excluded and why?
What, if any, of the specifically enumerated fees not
included in the proposed definition should be added?
C. Specific Elements of the Definition
The Councils especially welcome feedback on the following specific
aspects of the proposed rule. For each of the following, please comment
on whether addition of the following described language to the
illustrative list of recruitment fee would be helpful, unhelpful, or of
no impact, and why.
Submitting applications, making recommendations,
recruiting, reserving, committing, soliciting, identifying,
considering, interviewing, referring, retaining, transferring,
selection, or placing potential job applicants.
Labor broker services, both one-time and recurring.
Exit clearances, and security clearances associated with
visas.
Sending, transit and receiving country government-mandated
fees, levies, and insurance.
Pre-employment medical examinations or vaccinations in the
sending country.
Receiving country medical examinations.
Transportation and subsistence costs while in transit,
including, but not limited to, airfare or costs of other modes of
international transportation, terminal fees, and travel taxes
associated with travel from sending country to receiving country and
the return journey at the end of the contract.
Transportation and subsistence costs from the airport or
disembarkation point to the worksite.
Security deposits and bonds.
The inclusion of a collateral requirement, such as land
deeds, in contracts.
Contract breach fees.
An employer's recruiters, agents or attorneys, or other
notary or legal fees.
Insurance.
Contributions to worker welfare funds or government
provided benefits in sending countries required to be paid by supplier.
III. Determinations
Determinations were made in connection with the final rule
implementing title XVII (entitled ``Ending Trafficking in Government
Contracting (ETGCA)'') of the National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013 to apply these statutory regulations. For an
explanation of the Council's determinations, see the preamble published
in the Federal Register at 80 FR 4967 and 4983-4986, on January 29,
2015. This proposed rule just clarifies the requirements by adding a
definition.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was subject to
review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, dated September 30, 1993. This proposed rule is not a major
rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD, GSA, and NASA do not expect proposed change to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq. However, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) has
been prepared and is summarized as follows:
[[Page 29246]]
The reason for this action is to develop a standard definition
of ``recruitment fees'' in order to clarify how the Government
treats this prohibited practice that has been associated with labor
trafficking, within the scope of application of the FAR.
The objective of this rule is to clarify the types of charges
and fees that contractors, subcontractors, and their employees or
agents are prohibited from charging to employees or potential
employees, under the Government policy on combating trafficking in
persons.
This proposed rule would apply to all entities, whether small or
other than small, that are contractors or subcontractors on U.S.
Government contracts. In 2014 there were about 350,000 active
registrants in the System for Award Management (SAM). DoD, GSA, and
NASA estimate approximately half of the registrants (175,000) are
small entities that will receive a contract or subcontract in a
particular year. However, there would be no actual impact from this
rule unless the small entity was planning to charge or allow another
entity, acting on their behalf, to charge a recruitment fee to an
employee or potential employee. There is no data available to
estimate this impact. Further, for the definition of ``small
business,'' the Regulatory Flexibility Act refers to the Small
Business Act, which in turn allows the U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA) Administrator to specify detailed definitions
or standards (5 U.S.C. 601(3) and 15 U.S.C. 632(a)). The SBA
regulations at 13 CFR 121.105(a)(1) discuss who is a small business:
``Except for small agricultural cooperatives, a business concern
eligible for assistance from SBA as a small business is a business
entity organized for profit, with a place of business located in the
United States, and which operates primarily within the United States
or which makes a significant contribution to the U.S. economy
through payment of taxes or use of American products, materials or
labor.'' So, this initial regulatory flexibility analysis does not
need to address impact on foreign small entities with Government
contracts or subcontracts that are not small businesses as defined
by the Small Business Act.
There are no reporting or recordkeeping requirements associated
with this rule.
The rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any other
Federal rules.
There were no significant alternatives identified that would
meet the objective of the rule.
The Regulatory Secretariat Division has submitted a copy of the
IRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration. A copy of the IRFA may be obtained from the Regulatory
Secretariat Division. DoD, GSA and NASA invite comments from small
business concerns and other interested parties on the expected impact
of this rule on small entities.
DoD, GSA, and NASA will also consider comments from small entities
concerning the existing regulations in subparts affected by this
proposed rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must
submit such comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (FAR Case
2015-017), in correspondence.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 22 and 52
Government procurement.
Dated: May 5, 2016.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
Therefore, DoD, GSA and NASA propose amending 48 CFR parts 22 and
52 as set forth below:
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 22 and 52 continues to read
as follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 51
U.S.C. 20113.
PART 22--APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS
0
2. Amend section 22.1702 by adding, in alphabetical order, the
definition ``Recruitment fees'' to read as follows:
22.1702 Definitions.
* * * * *
Recruitment fees means the following:
(1) Recruitment fees include, but are not limited to, fees,
charges, costs, assessments, or other financial obligations assessed
against employees or potential employees, associated with the
recruiting process, regardless of the manner of their imposition or
collection--
(i) For soliciting, identifying, considering, interviewing,
referring, retaining, transferring, selecting, testing, training,
providing new-hire orientation, recommending, or placing employees or
potential employees;
(ii) For covering the cost, in whole or in part, of advertising;
(iii) For any activity related to obtaining permanent or temporary
labor certification;
(iv) For processing petitions;
(v) For visas and any fee that facilitates an employee obtaining a
visa such as appointment and application fees;
(vi) For government-mandated costs such as border crossing fees;
(vii) For procuring photographs and identity documentation,
including any nongovernmental passport fees;
(viii) Charged as a condition of access to the job opportunity,
including procuring medical examinations and immunizations and
obtaining background, reference and security clearance checks and
examinations; additional certifications;
(ix) For an employer's recruiters, agents or attorneys, or other
notary or legal fees; and
(x) For language interpreters or translators.
(2) Any fee, charge, cost, or assessment may be a recruitment fee
regardless of whether the payment is in property or money, deducted
from wages, paid back in wage or benefit concessions, paid back as a
kickback, bribe, in-kind payment, free labor, tip, or tribute, remitted
in connection with recruitment, or collected by an employer or a third
party, including, but not limited to--
(i) Agents;
(ii) Recruiters;
(iii) Staffing firms (including private employment and placement
firms);
(iv) Subsidiaries/affiliates of the employer;
(v) Any agent or employee of such entities; and
(vi) Subcontractors at all tiers.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend section 22.1703 by--
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(5)(i); and
0
b. Removing from paragraph (a)(6) the word ``employees'' and adding
``employees or potential employees'' in its place.
The revisions read as follows:
22.1703 Policy.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(5)(i) Using misleading or fraudulent practices during the
recruitment of employees or offering of employment, such as failing to
disclose, in a format and language understood by the employee or
potential employee, basic information or making material
misrepresentations during the recruitment of employees regarding the
key terms and conditions of employment, including wages and fringe
benefits, the location of work, the living conditions, housing and
associated costs (if employer or agent provided or arranged), any
significant costs to be charged to the employee or potential employee,
and, if applicable, the hazardous nature of the work;
* * * * *
PART 52--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
4. Amend section 52.212-5 by--
[[Page 29247]]
0
a. Revising the date of the clause and paragraphs (b)(33)(i) and
(e)(1)(xi)(A); and
0
b. In alternate II, revising the date and paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(J)(1).
The revisions read as follows:
52.212-5 Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes
or Executive Orders--Commercial Items.
* * * * *
Contract Terms and Conditions Required To Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders--Commercial Items (DATE)
* * * * *
(b) * * *
__(33)(i) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (DATE) (22
U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).
* * * * *
(e)(1) * * *
(xi) * * *
__(A) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (DATE) (22 U.S.C.
chapter 78 and E.O 13627).
* * * * *
Alternate II (DATE). * * *
* * * * *
(e)(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(J) __(1) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (DATE) (22
U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O 13627).
* * * * *
0
5. Amend section 52.213-4 by revising the date of the clause and
paragraphs (a)(2)(viii) and (b)(1)(viii)(A) to read as follows:
52.213-4 Terms and Conditions--Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than
Commercial Items).
* * * * *
Terms and Conditions--Simplified Acquisitions (Other Than Commercial
Items) (DATE)
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(viii) 52.244-6, Subcontracts for Commercial Items (DATE).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii)(A) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (DATE) (22
U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O 13627) (Applies to all solicitations and
contracts).
* * * * *
0
6. Amend section 52.222-50 by--
0
a. Revising the date of the clause;
0
b. Adding to paragraph (a), in alphabetical order, the definition
``Recruitment fees'';
0
c. Revising paragraph (b)(5)(i);
0
d. Removing from paragraph (b)(6) the word ``employees'' and adding
``employees or potential employees'' in its place; and
0
e. Removing from paragraph (h)(3)(iii) the word ``employee,'' and
adding ``employee or potential employee,'' in its place.
The revisions and addition read as follows:
52.222-50 Combating Trafficking in Persons.
* * * * *
Combating Trafficking in Persons (DATE)
(a) * * *
Recruitment fees means the following:
(1) Recruitment fees include, but are not limited to, fees,
charges, costs, assessments, or other financial obligations assessed
against employees or potential employees, associated with the
recruiting process, regardless of the manner of their imposition or
collection--
(i) For soliciting, identifying, considering, interviewing,
referring, retaining, transferring, selecting, testing, training,
providing new-hire orientation, recommending, or placing employees
or potential employees;
(ii) For covering the cost, in whole or in part, of advertising;
(iii) For any activity related to obtaining permanent or
temporary labor certification;
(iv) For processing petitions;
(v) For visas and any fee that facilitates an employee obtaining
a visa such as appointment and application fees;
(vi) For government-mandated costs such as border crossing fees;
(vii) For procuring photographs and identity documentation,
including any nongovernmental passport fees;
(viii) Charged as a condition of access to the job opportunity,
including procuring medical examinations and immunizations and
obtaining background, reference and security clearance checks and
examinations; additional certifications;
(ix) For an employer's recruiters, agents or attorneys, or other
notary or legal fees, and
(x) For language interpreters or translators.
(2) Any fee, charge, cost, or assessment may be a recruitment
fee regardless of whether the payment is in property or money,
deducted from wages, paid back in wage or benefit concessions, paid
back as a kickback, bribe, in-kind payment, free labor, tip, or
tribute, remitted in connection with recruitment, or collected by an
employer or a third party, including, but not limited to--
(i) Agents;
(ii) Recruiters;
(iii) Staffing firms (including private employment and placement
firms);
(iv) Subsidiaries/affiliates of the employer;
(v) Any agent or employee of such entities; and
(vi) Subcontractors at all tiers.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5)(i) Using misleading or fraudulent practices during the
recruitment of employees or offering of employment, such as failing
to disclose, in a format and language understood by the employee or
potential employee, basic information or making material
misrepresentations during the recruitment of employees regarding the
key terms and conditions of employment, including wages and fringe
benefits, the location of work, the living conditions, housing and
associated costs (if employer or agent provided or arranged), any
significant costs to be charged to the employee or potential
employee, and, if applicable, the hazardous nature of the work;
* * * * *
0
7. Amend section 52.244-6 by revising the date of the clause and
paragraph (c)(1)(x)(A) to read as follows:
52.244-6 Subcontracts for Commercial Items.
* * * * *
Subcontracts for Commercial Items (DATE)
* * * * *
(c)(1) * * *
(x)(A) 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons (DATE) (22
U.S.C. chapter 78 and E.O. 13627).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-11056 Filed 5-10-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P