United States Marshals Service; Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection Comments Requested; Extension With Change, of a Previously Approved Collection USMS Medical Forms, 28887-28888 [2016-10936]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
110–246, which amended the Act; (2)
responses to the Advisory Council
Report; and (3) other items within the
jurisdiction of the Council.
Public Disclosure
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, please be advised that your
entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: April 4, 2016.
Shelly Wiser,
Acting Regional Director, Upper Colorado
Region.
[FR Doc. 2016–10202 Filed 5–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Lodging of Proposed First
Amended Consent Decree Under the
Clean Water Act
On May 2, 2016, the Department of
Justice lodged a proposed First
Amended Consent Decree with the
United States District Court for the
Northern District of Ohio in the lawsuit
entitled United States v. City of Akron,
Ohio, et al., Civil Action No. 09–cv–
00272.
In this action the United States, and
the State of Ohio in a cross-claim,
sought civil penalties and injunctive
relief for violations of the Clean Water
Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., in
connection with the City of Akron’s
(‘‘Akron’s’’ or ‘‘City’s’’) operation of its
municipal wastewater treatment facility
and sewer system. Under the Consent
Decree, which was approved by the
Court in January 2014, Akron was
required to develop and implement a
comprehensive plan to address
overflows from its combined sewer
system and bypasses around secondary
treatment at the wastewater treatment
facility. That plan, known as the ‘‘Long
Term Control Plan Update’’ (‘‘LTCP
Update’’), which was approved by the
United States in November 2011 and the
State of Ohio in April 2012, sets forth
specific projects that the City is required
to implement, and identifies dates for
completion of these projects.
The proposed amendment modifies
two provisions of the 2014 Consent
Decree to take into account new
engineering solutions. Both of the
affected projects are included in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
approved LTCP Update. The first
modification requires that the City
expand secondary treatment at its
wastewater treatment plant sooner than
is required under the current agreement:
Under the amended Decree, the City
will achieve 220 million gallons/day of
secondary treatment capacity by 2019
instead of 2021. In exchange, the City
may delay by approximately two years
the installation of a biologically
enhanced high rate treatment
(‘‘BioActiflo’’) unit at the treatment
plant. The City has committed to, and
the United States previously approved
(under the terms of the Consent Decree
itself), an increase in the size of
secondary treatment capacity, and an
equivalent reduction in the size of the
BioActiflo unit.
The second modification eliminates
the requirement for the City to construct
a mile-and-a-half-long sewer line
parallel to an existing interceptor that
connects the combined sewer system to
the wastewater treatment plant. In place
of the parallel sewer, the amendment
requires the City to construct a steel
reinforced concrete cap along all but a
fraction of the existing interceptor sewer
line. The cap will be in place by
November 2017, the same Achievement
of Full Operation date as for the original
project.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the First
Amended Consent Decree. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States v. City of Akron,
Ohio, et al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–1–1–
3144/2. All comments must be
submitted no later than thirty (30) days
after the publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
During the public comment period,
the First Amendment to the Consent
Decree may be examined and
downloaded at this Justice Department
Web site: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/
consent-decrees. We will provide a
paper copy of the proposed amendment
to the Consent Decree upon written
request and payment of reproduction
costs. Please mail your request and
payment to: Consent Decree Library,
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28887
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $7.25 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Randall M. Stone,
Acting Assistant Section Chief,
Environmental Enforcement Section,
Environment and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2016–10954 Filed 5–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1105–0099]
United States Marshals Service;
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection
Comments Requested; Extension With
Change, of a Previously Approved
Collection USMS Medical Forms
U.S. Marshals Service,
Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Justice
(DOJ), U.S. Marshals Service, will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until July
11, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public
burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the
proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or
additional information, please contact
Nicole Timmons, U.S. Marshals Service,
Washington, DC 20530–0001 (phone:
202–307–5168).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is
necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
U.S. Marshals Service, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
28888
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 10, 2016 / Notices
methodology and assumptions
used;
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use
of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
1. Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a currently approved
collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
USMS Medical Forms
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
Form Numbers:
—USM–522A Physician Evaluation
Report for USMS Operational
Employees
—USM–522P Physician Evaluation
Report for USMS Operational
Employees—Pregnancy Only
—USM–600 Physical Requirements of
USMS District Security Officers
—CSO–012 Request to Reevaluate Court
Security Officer’s Medical
Qualification
Component for all above-listed forms:
U.S. Marshals Service.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
—USM–522A Physician Evaluation
Report for USMS Operational
Employees
Æ Affected public: Private sector
(Physicians)
Æ Brief abstract: This form is
completed by an USMS operational
employee’s treating physician to
report any illness/injury (other than
pregnancy) that requires restriction
from full performance of duties for
longer than 80 consecutive hours.
—USM–522P Physician Evaluation
Report for USMS Operational
Employees (Pregnancy Only)
Æ Affected public: Private sector
(Physicians)
Æ Brief abstract: Form USM–522P
must be completed by the OB/GYN
physician of pregnant USMS
operational employees to specify
any restrictions from full
performance of duties.
—USM–600 Physical Requirements of
USMS District Security Officers
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:33 May 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
Affected public: Private sector
(Physicians)
Æ Brief abstract: It is the policy of the
USMS to ensure a law enforcement
work force that is medically able to
safely perform therequired job
functions. All applicants for law
enforcement positions must have
pre-employment physical
examinations; existing District
Security Officers (DSOs) must
recertify that they are physically fit
to perform the duties of their
position each year. DSOs are
individual contractors, not
employees of USMS; Form USM–
522 does not apply to DSOs.
—CSO–012 Request to Reevaluate Court
Security Officer’s Qualification
Æ Affected public: Private sector
(Physicians)
Æ Brief abstract: This form is
completed by the Court Security
Officer (CSO)’s attending physician
to determine whether a CSO is
physically able to return to work
after an injury, serious illness, or
surgery. The physician returns the
evaluation to the contracting
company, and if the determination
is that the CSO may return to work,
the CSO–012 is then signed off on
by the contracting company and
forwarded to the USMS for final
review by USMS’ designated
medical reviewing official. Court
Security Officers are contractors,
not employees of USMS; Form
USM–522A does not apply to CSOs.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond:
—USM–522A Physician Evaluation
Report for USMS Operational
Employees
It is estimated that 208 respondents
will complete a 20 minute form twice
per year.
—USM–522P Physician Evaluation
Report for USMS Operational
Employees (Pregnancy Only)
It is estimated that 7 respondents will
complete a 15 minute form twice per
year.
—USM–600 Physical Requirements of
USMS District Security Officers
It is estimated that 2,000 respondents
will complete a 20 minute form.
—CSO–012 Request to Reevaluate Court
Security Officer’s Medical
Qualification
It is estimated that 300 respondents
will complete a 30 minute form.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection:
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
—USM–522A Physician Evaluation
Report for USMS Operational
Employees
There are an estimated 139 annual
total burden hours associated with this
collection.
—USM–522P Physician Evaluation
Report for USMS Operational
Employees (Pregnancy Only)
There are an estimated 4 annual total
burden hours associated with this
collection.
—USM–600 Physical Requirements of
USMS District Security Officers
There are an estimated 667 annual
total burden hours associated with this
collection.
—CSO–012 Request to Reevaluate Court
Security Officer’s Medical
Qualification
There are an estimated 150 annual
total burden hours associated with this
collection.
Total Annual Time Burden (Hr): 960.
If additional information is required
contact: Jerri Murray, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: May 5, 2016.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2016–10936 Filed 5–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Filing of Proposed
Settlement Agreement Regarding
Environmental Claims in Connection
With Army Creek Landfill Site,
Blosenski Landfill Site and Delaware
Sand and Gravel Site
On May 3, 2016, a proposed
Settlement Agreement Regarding
Environmental Claims in Connection
with Army Creek Landfill Site,
Blosenski Landfill Site and Delaware
Sand and Gravel Site was filed in the
United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Illinois, in the
proceeding entitled In re Budd
Company, Inc., Ch. 11, Bankr. No. 14–
11873–JBS.
Under the proposed Settlement
Agreement, the debtor, Budd Company,
Inc. (‘‘Budd’’) will agree to allowed
general unsecured claims of (1)
$100,000 for response costs incurred
and to be incurred at the Army Creek
Landfill Site near New Castle, Delaware;
E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM
10MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28887-28888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10936]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1105-0099]
United States Marshals Service; Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection Comments Requested; Extension With
Change, of a Previously Approved Collection USMS Medical Forms
AGENCY: U.S. Marshals Service, Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-day notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), U.S. Marshals Service, will
be submitting the following information collection request to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until
July 11, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments
especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time,
suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection
instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact
Nicole Timmons, U.S. Marshals Service, Washington, DC 20530-0001
(phone: 202-307-5168).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of
the following four points:
--Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the U.S. Marshals
Service, including whether the information will have practical utility;
--Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
[[Page 28888]]
methodology and assumptions used;
--Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected can be enhanced; and
--Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection
1. Type of Information Collection: Extension of a currently
approved collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection: USMS Medical Forms
3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of
the Department sponsoring the collection:
Form Numbers:
--USM-522A Physician Evaluation Report for USMS Operational Employees
--USM-522P Physician Evaluation Report for USMS Operational Employees--
Pregnancy Only
--USM-600 Physical Requirements of USMS District Security Officers
--CSO-012 Request to Reevaluate Court Security Officer's Medical
Qualification
Component for all above-listed forms: U.S. Marshals Service.
4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract:
--USM-522A Physician Evaluation Report for USMS Operational Employees
[cir] Affected public: Private sector (Physicians)
[cir] Brief abstract: This form is completed by an USMS operational
employee's treating physician to report any illness/injury (other than
pregnancy) that requires restriction from full performance of duties
for longer than 80 consecutive hours.
--USM-522P Physician Evaluation Report for USMS Operational Employees
(Pregnancy Only)
[cir] Affected public: Private sector (Physicians)
[cir] Brief abstract: Form USM-522P must be completed by the OB/GYN
physician of pregnant USMS operational employees to specify any
restrictions from full performance of duties.
--USM-600 Physical Requirements of USMS District Security Officers
Affected public: Private sector (Physicians)
[cir] Brief abstract: It is the policy of the USMS to ensure a law
enforcement work force that is medically able to safely perform
therequired job functions. All applicants for law enforcement positions
must have pre-employment physical examinations; existing District
Security Officers (DSOs) must recertify that they are physically fit to
perform the duties of their position each year. DSOs are individual
contractors, not employees of USMS; Form USM-522 does not apply to
DSOs.
--CSO-012 Request to Reevaluate Court Security Officer's Qualification
[cir] Affected public: Private sector (Physicians)
[cir] Brief abstract: This form is completed by the Court Security
Officer (CSO)'s attending physician to determine whether a CSO is
physically able to return to work after an injury, serious illness, or
surgery. The physician returns the evaluation to the contracting
company, and if the determination is that the CSO may return to work,
the CSO-012 is then signed off on by the contracting company and
forwarded to the USMS for final review by USMS' designated medical
reviewing official. Court Security Officers are contractors, not
employees of USMS; Form USM-522A does not apply to CSOs.
5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of
time estimated for an average respondent to respond:
--USM-522A Physician Evaluation Report for USMS Operational Employees
It is estimated that 208 respondents will complete a 20 minute form
twice per year.
--USM-522P Physician Evaluation Report for USMS Operational Employees
(Pregnancy Only)
It is estimated that 7 respondents will complete a 15 minute form
twice per year.
--USM-600 Physical Requirements of USMS District Security Officers
It is estimated that 2,000 respondents will complete a 20 minute
form.
--CSO-012 Request to Reevaluate Court Security Officer's Medical
Qualification
It is estimated that 300 respondents will complete a 30 minute
form.
6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection:
--USM-522A Physician Evaluation Report for USMS Operational Employees
There are an estimated 139 annual total burden hours associated
with this collection.
--USM-522P Physician Evaluation Report for USMS Operational Employees
(Pregnancy Only)
There are an estimated 4 annual total burden hours associated with
this collection.
--USM-600 Physical Requirements of USMS District Security Officers
There are an estimated 667 annual total burden hours associated
with this collection.
--CSO-012 Request to Reevaluate Court Security Officer's Medical
Qualification
There are an estimated 150 annual total burden hours associated
with this collection.
Total Annual Time Burden (Hr): 960.
If additional information is required contact: Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice,
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: May 5, 2016.
Jerri Murray,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2016-10936 Filed 5-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-04-P